The fact that you can legitimately thrash and headband to this song really emphasis Weird Al's musical understanding without such a absurd and hilarious premise this song would not sound out of place on a Rage album.
"I sued Delta Airlines because they sold me a ticket to New Jersey, I went there- and it SUCKED" No matter how many times I hear this song, this line will ALWAYS make me laugh out loud.
If anyone's wondering what the "original" is its kind of a medley of a few Rage Against The Machine songs, mainly Bombtrack with elements of Killing In The Name, Know Your Enemy and Bulls On Parade thrown in.
0:00 to 0:12 = Bombtrack & Guerrilla Radio. 0:13 to 0:26 = Bombtrack. 0:27 to 1:10= Bulls on Parade & Wake Up. 1:11 to 1:21 = Freedom & Killing in the Name. 1:22 to 1:34 = Bombtrack. 1:35 to 1:46 = Know Your Enemy. 1:47 to 2:30 = Bulls on Parade & Wake Up. 2:31 to 3:02 = Freedom & Killing in the Name. 3:03 to 3:16 = Killing in the Name, Freedom & Bullet in the Head. 3:17 to 3:51 = Bullet in the Head & Wake Up.
Bodine v. Enterprise High School: Nineteen-year old falls through skylight while trying to steal gymnasium floodlights, sues school for injuries and wins. This is one of many court cases where a criminal sued the victim and one. It's really dumb, but sometimes it really does happen.
The coffee being spilled in the lap is definitely Stella Liebeck, but he's changed it from McDonalds to Starbucks. "I'll sue ya if you even look at me funny" could be a reference to Prince, who constantly rejected Als offers to parody his music. At one point when they were both supposed to attend the American Music Awards, Prince had his lawyers send a letter to Al, telling him to not even look at Prince in the eye.
sorry, gravity is a governmental instiution that is paid for to make you stay to the ground, it is 100% legal for them to do this, sorry, please contact your local government for more information
Do people in Japan also sue sometimes? wonder if there was a lawsuit against the people that does the Pokemon Anime for that one episode and possible the news for showing the same scene again.
It is sad though that the coffee lawsuit was referenced here. I really hope most people know the truth about that lawsuit by now. It wasn't frivolous, that elderly woman had 3rd degree genital burns. I'd sue McDonalds too.
The truth is that she chose to place a 180 degree cup of coffee (in a paper cup) between her legs while being a passenger in a car. She spilled the cup into her lap. Her attorney argued that since is was hotter than a "normal cup of coffee" (175 degrees) McDonalds was negligent. Her injuries were real and sad but it wasn't McDonalds fault. Regardless of how painful an accident is, accepting responsibility, rather than blaming others for your choices, is the right thing to do. That's the whole point of this parody.
@@roses2155 two things: according to the official investigation, a difference of 5 degrees lowers the time to suffer third degree burns from 12+ seconds down to 3. and the coffee was 20 degrees hotter than it should've been, not 5 like you claimed. seems so weird to me that you would pick the literal poster child of misrepresented lawsuits to defend? in any case, the right thing to do is doing even basic research on what you're trying to correct people over, Rose
@@roses2155 "The coffee was not just “hot,” but dangerously hot. McDonald’s corporate policy was to serve it at a temperature that could cause serious burns in seconds. Mrs. Liebeck’s injuries were far from frivolous. She was wearing sweatpants that absorbed the coffee and kept it against her skin. She suffered third-degree burns (the most serious kind) and required skin grafts on her inner thighs and elsewhere. Liebeck’s case was far from an isolated event. McDonald’s had received more than 700 previous reports of injury from its coffee, including reports of third-degree burns, and had paid settlements in some cases. Mrs. Liebeck offered to settle the case for $20,000 to cover her medical expenses and lost income. But McDonald’s never offered more than $800, so the case went to trial. The jury found Mrs. Liebeck to be partially at fault for her injuries, reducing the compensation for her injuries accordingly. But the jury’s punitive damages award made headlines - upset by McDonald’s unwillingness to correct a policy despite hundreds of people suffering injuries, they awarded Liebeck the equivalent of two days’ worth of revenue from coffee sales for the restaurant chain. That wasn’t, however, the end of it. The original punitive damage award was ultimately reduced by more than 80 percent by the judge." TL;DR McDonald's knowingly brewed their coffee to a temperature that could _seriously damage someone within seconds_ AND HAD ACTUALLY INJURED HUNDREDS OF PEOPLE BEFORE THIS and *she won her case* , the dispute was the SETTLEMENT NOT WHO WAS AT FAULT Hot coffee SHOULD NOT cause serious injuries just because you spill it on yourself!
Can we just stop for a moment and admire how awesomely he parodied Rage Against the Machine and what I can only guess as being a Bulls On Parade-inspired track? They even included a Tom Morello-like dude complete with his Arm the Homeless guitar!
That gives me an idea! I should sue Twitch for not letting me use the chat unless I sign in via FaceBook! I don't have a FaceBook account, nor do I want one! Thanks!
While most are bogus, the one about spraging his ankle while he's robbing your place has really happened before. And people have won settlements for getting hurt while robbing people's homes. Disgusting that the justice system rewards criminals like that.
Actually, most of them ate true, they are only worded differently. For instance the part with frappuino and StarBucks. In the original lawsuit the woman sued McDonalds because, while she was holding the cup in between her legs in a car, she spilled hot coffee on her lap and got second and third degree burns.
It’s a “style parody.” Sometimes he parodies a band’s sound without copying any specific themes or riffs from them. “Dog Eat Dog” is a Talking Heads style parody. “Dare to Be Stupid” is a Devo style parody. “Germs” is a Nine Inch Nails style parody. Sometimes it’s hard to tell. Is “You Don’t Love Me Anymore” a style parody of Extreme, or is it a full original? “Where’s Johnny” turned out to be a specific song parody but until I heard the song it was parodying, I thought it was a Scritti Politti style parody.
i know that the lady suing mcdonalds pretty much became a meme about frivolous lawsuits, but she legit got third degree burns on her legs. totally unnecessary for it to be that hot.
McDonald's put a ton of money into having the media disparage her afterwards. It's a big part of why we have this myth of out of control frivolous lawsuits.
My five-year-old son burned down my apartment after playing with matches, so of course I sued MTV. What, you expect me to take responsibility for what my kids watch? That's the TV's job.
0:01 to 0:11 = Bombtrack & Guerrilla Radio. 0:12 to 0:22 = Bombtrack. 0:23 to 0:27 = Killing In The Name. 0:28 to 1:10= Bulls on Parade & Wake Up. 1:11 to 1:21 = Freedom & Killing in the Name. 1:22 to 1:34 = Bombtrack. 1:35 to 1:45 = Know Your Enemy & Take The Power Back. 1:46 to 2:29 = Bulls on Parade & Wake Up. 2:30 to 2:39 = Freedom & Killing in the Name. 2:40 to 2:51 = Bombtrack. 2:52 to 3:01 = Freedom & Killing in the Name. 3:02 to 3:17 = Guerrilla Radio, Killing in the Name & Bullet in the Head. 3:18 to 3:51 = Bullet in the Head, Guerrilla Radio, Take the Power Back & Wake Up.
@@rebca_ not really since crazy people can't represent themselves so I'm suing the court for letting him sue the mental hospital. Also who let this guy out of the mental hospital? I'm suing the hospital.
I mean conditions in some mental hospitals are definitely _actually_ lawsuit-worthy, or at least they used to be. People deserve human rights regardless of how their brains are working!
To those who discuss the Liebeck v. McDonalds case (1984) below, Ms. Liebeck became the poster child for American lawsuits gone haywire--unnecessarily so. There was great vitriol and spite for this poor soul. Most people don't realize that this martyr (she became one in that case) is responsible for the cup holders in our cars today. Thanks to her bravery, we don't have to risk the same, painful fate--and YES (!) it was quite painful. I saw pictures of her THIRD degree burns, which required she undergo an operation. At the time of her painful and quite serious injuries, there was NO place to put the cup due to the car-design (and car designs, in general). Moreover, the car was parked--NOT moving. She was the passenger. Originally, she ONLY wanted McD's to pay her medical bills--AND LOWER THE COFFEE TEMPERATURE, which was HOTTER than industry STANDARDS. That's it! They arrogantly refused to respect her wishes, and she pressed on. McD's REFUSED to lower the temperature notwithstanding the fact that HUNDREDS of people ALREADY gave McD's notice that they were injured during a given time--when the injuries were recorded. And, by the way, NO, Ms. Liebeck did NOT gain millions of dollars. A trial court judge reduced her original verdict amount--given to her at the hands of a horrified jury to ONLY $640,000 (having seen the pictures, you know what I mean by "only"). It was a David v. Goliath case of arrogance--and a concerned citizen who refused to just knuckle under. Yes, folks, this poor lady pressed on because she didn't want to see ANYONE ELSE suffer that fate. Rather than enviously looking at her with disdain, perhaps people should educate themselves on the true facts behind the Liebeck v. McDonald's story. Thank you, Ms. Liebeck. May you RIP.
Pedro DuhHusky Hi Pedro. Thanks for your most inquisitive reply. For a company to need changes due to people getting hurt is equivocated with negligence according to Tort law. Thus, as a matter of law, McDonalds would be held to be negligent if they were found to be selling coffee that is significantly hotter than industry standards. A company is held to a reasonableness standard. If they are found to be selling coffee that is unreasonably hot--hotter than industry standards--then they are found to be negligent. Moreover, if the company has had notice of hundreds (that we know of at a certain time) of people getting burned and they refused to change it, that is a problem. (People will continue getting hurt without changes.) Importantly, in personal injury law, there are damages for pain and suffering. Admittedly, this is balanced against the negligence of the Plaintiff. However, where a product is dangerous enough that many people are getting hurt with it--and the company has received notice after notice, such that they are well-aware of the volume of injuries--then it becomes a problem for the company (this can be seen in products liability cases also, with dangerous and defective designs). Nevertheless, American law compensates people for pain and suffering (I think this is where you may have the issue--but it is our law, and I do agree that if something can help end human suffering then I am all for it). Also, judges award punitive damages to deter Defendants from committing the same type of acts repeatedly. The fact that defendants pay out punitive damages acts to deter others from wrongful acts, such as those that unnecessarily hurt people. By the way, punitive damages are not restricted to hurting people. There was a case involving Denny's and ONE (if I remember correctly) alleged racial comment (about someone looking out of place--where it was the INSINUATION where the problem lay) led to a MULTI-MILLION DOLLAR payout. Nobody got hurt. Yep, sticks and stones may break bones--but in law if one goes after a member of a federally protected class (i.e., racial, religion, gender etc.) then they are playing with proverbial fire. While that would not have been the verdict prior to 1964, it is law now. It is meant to deter oppression. Getting back to Liebeck, if we can do something to deter needless human suffering--and companies tend to listen when they have to pay--then it is a needed deterrent. If you haven't seen the pictures of Ms. Liebeck, Google them: You will be horrified--and you will agree that no human being should need to undergo what amounts to unspeakable horror at the extremes of what is torture, and conceivably, the limits of what human suffering could possibly be (it really is so much worse than "just" a coffee burn). Bottom line? Laws are meant to afford justice to victims--and to prevent or deter human suffering.
Pedro DuhHusky If you have a hammer, that you bought, and you crush your foot with it, THAT'S YOUR PROBLEM. How can a hammer company fix a problem with a hammer, IT'S A HAMMER. Lawsuits are mostly people who feel they should not be held responsible for their own actions. Companies should not be sued for the incompetence of society.
Matt Ricketts You ramble on incoherently and nobody could make sense of your POORLY WRITTEN rant, FOOL--the only "DUMB SHIT" is YOU!! BTW, that was LEGAL standards, STOOPID shit!! When you learn to respect others perhaps you'll get treated likewise. Talk to the HAND!!
onmy computer2020gal actually, a Chad is a man that can get women interested in him, and treats them with respect. And a Chad treats everyone equally, no matter their background.
onmy computer2020gal the thing is, women tend to be governed by pure emotion and little else. Finding a woman who isn’t dominated by emotions is... Easier to find than a unicorn but harder than winning the lottery.
***** Which is why a seizure lawsuit is not comparable. The reason for notification laws on flashing lights is because without some notice it is impossible to avoid them and it really can kill someone with seizures. I get the point, which is why I am saying that is not the same issue.
I think the most interesting part of this is that, unlike the lawsuits in the song, a lawsuit about epilepsy warnings is actually completely justified, seeing as seizures can be fatal. Irony, man...
Reminds me of a broadcast of an Adventures in Odyssey program, a lawyer won a lawsuit so spectacularly that he became so in-demand that he couldn’t take on every client that approached him so he got sued for that
@@drewbaker2336 oh man, I never thought I'd come across someone who also grew up with adventures in odyssey. Though I don't remember that episode. But it could be because it's been years since I listened to the program.
@@drewbaker2336 Bart actually did threaten to sue him after they... Technically won, I guess.. Wonder what the writers would think of this song... That episode came out in 1995.
Why is that nobody who even understands what Fine Bros was trying to is making jokes about them, yes they were trying to own that industry on youtube but they were going to provide resources and views, it was basically a huge business deal that due to the numbers of uneducated people on youtube fell down immediately.
"If I sprain my ankle, while I'm robbing your place, if I hurt my knuckles, when I punch you in the face,'' Sounds like the UK except you actually go to jail AND get sued.
I was reminded of the coffee lawsuit where a McDonald's would serve boiling coffee (300°F) in a faulty cup and when a granny suffered legitimate burns they made a PR campaign to make her seem like the bad guy.
Water evaporates at various temperatures, but it boils and turns into vapor at 100°C (212°F) at standard atmospheric pressure (1 atm). However, evaporation can occur at lower temperatures as well, depending on factors like humidity and air movement.
Correction, it was between 180 to 190 degrees fahrenheit and McDonald's eventually was forced to admit to it. Also, the boiler for the coffee is shut to not let the water out as coffee soaks and dilutes the water. Before trying to say "But that's impossible? It would be steam! Yes, that's why you see steam when you make coffee. Google it before and double check the dude you're trying to disprove isn't actually right before trying to quote one fact to disprove the whole thing he said.
outatis ater Yah, that's what we got for being high all the time in high school.But can you blame me? IT'S CALLED HIGH SCHOOL FOUR FUCK'S SAKE, I THOUGHT I WAS MEANT TO SMOKE WEED
I'll sue Weird Al cuz I was watching this video while driving and I got in a car crash and died. I'm using my spirit computer to write this. *I wonder how to file a lawsuit from the grave...*
It's a little better now. The stores have Halloween and Christmas decorations for sale at the same time. Thanksgiving should sue stores for forgetting about it's existence.
I dabbled in law and only a few of these laws suits might make it into court. which is the whole point of the song, giving bad reasons to lawsuit. going back to my main point when everybody in the crowd jumped him I could see that going to court and winning. I think I saw some where in the comments about some one hurting themselves while robbing then sueing. and some people have claimed the act of self defense which I believe he said "if I hurt my knuckle while punching you in the face" he could easily claim self defense.
***** if they get a bad rep. most people won't want to either buy what ever they are selling, work there because of its reputation, and finally a lot of the press will try to dig deeper and get more dirt on them, to bash it. some of these companies can pay it off without hassle so its better to pay it off now then take it to court and have a chance of losing even more money.
Marshall Gorgan rusty zaremba ***** how many courts have you been to where THIS was the case??!! with little things like this press and others don't usually announce this stuff, meaning YOU would have to be in the actual court.
hell sue you for suing him for suing you but then ill sue you for suing him for suing you but then youll sue me for suing you for suing him for suing you but then he'll think thats not right so he'll sue you for suing me for suing you for suing him but then i wouldnt like it if he tried to defend me so id sue him for suing you for suing me for suing you for suing him but then he'll sue me for not leting him defend me from you suing me for suing you for suing him but then id sue you for starting this whole suing contest but then you would sue me becuase you think im trying to look tough but then the judges in court would sue us for having a suing contest for no reason but then ill sue the judges for hurting my fellings by suing me for suing you for suing him for suing me for suing you for suing him
*Karens Apostrophes are for contraction or possessive nouns, not pluralizing. *they're (contraction of "THEY aRE") their: for possession there: for all other uses *the manager (singular) managers = plural
Al's Suing Reasons: Eating half a million chalupas and getting fat. (Taco Bell) Using Panasonic's microwave to dry off his cat. (Panasonic) Calling EarthLink and being put on hold. (Earthlink) Spilling a cold Frappuccino on his lap. (Starbucks) Swallowing a Nerf ball and nearly choking to death. (Toys "R" Us) Eating a bag of kitty litter and getting bad breath. (Petco) Putting his finger down in a bottle of Coca-Cola and getting it stuck. (The Coca-Cola Company) Buying a ticket to New Jersey, going there, and finding out that it sucks. (Delta Air Lines) Shoving a Duracell's AA right up his nose. (Duracell) Buying a Home Depot's hammer and dropping it on his toes. (Home Depot) Taking a bath with his laptop, causing it to stop working. (Dell Computers) Looking like a jerk when he wearing Fruit of the Loom's tightie-whities on his head. (Fruit of the Loom) Getting all depressed every time his cellphone is roaming. (Verizon) It looks too much like Wyoming. (The state of Colorado) Neiman Marcus putting up their Christmas decorations way out of season. (Neiman Marcus) He wanted to sue Ben Affleck, claiming that he didn't even need a reason to do so.
one of my friends got sued in Massachusetts by a burglar he broke a leg climbing through her window (didn't see the coffee table under it) and he won over $30,000!
King of Rock n’ Roll = Elvis King of Pop = Michael Jackson King of Heavy Metal = Ozzy Osbourne God of Rap = Eminem King of Parodies = Weird Al Yankovic
In fairness I don’t think the point was to say that all lawsuits are stupid, and there are a lot of ridiculous law suits out there. Still, yeah the coffee bit hasn’t aged well.
once a dude sued the family of kid he hit and killed for leaving a dent in the car from the bike the kid was riding guess what.............. He Won.....That Dickbag FUCKING WON
One time I was in line at a store register and there was this Hispanic girl in front of me and she walked up to the register. Some uptight white douchebag acted like he was in front of her and started freaking out. She calmly told him to calm down and stepped away. He then said while waiting for the cashier to ring him up, "I know you don't see white people". Now this is enough for him to deserve to get beat up, but she calmly walked up and he freaked out and started saying not to touch him and she would be arrested for assault and he'd sue her or something. Id like to mention this very patient lady was probably half his size and not even doing anything an he was threatening to call the cops. He was asking the cashier if she saw that and if she would do something and all this bullcrap. People lie that just as one example really need to grow a pair. I hate the fact that if he got a good lawyer he probably could have sued that poor lady. It's also completely ridiculous that you can sue for hurting yourself while breaking into someone's house. If you are breaking into someone's house, you should be prepared to get SHOT, not be thinking, well if I get caught, I can just pretend to get hurt and sue them. People like that just drive me crazy.
+Ronald Hubbard I could just picture that at a sporting event. "Please rise and remove your hats for our national anthem." *Pure silence, then suddenly...* "I'LL SUE YA! I'LL TAKE ALL YOUR MONEY!"
This is the best RATM song never made by RATM. Did tom or anyone from the band ever publicly comment on this song? Al is a seriously good musician and this works as a great original song.
@@scottdoesntmatter4409 That's because they, like many Leftists, have been indoctrinated by Marxists. Step one of the "Four Steps for Communist Ideological Subversion" (Yuri Bezmenov, 1985) Demoralization - this is a process which can take about 15-30 years to perform (a generation). *During this stage, the moral fibre and integrity of the country is put into question, thereby creating doubt in the minds of the people. To do so, manipulation of the media and academia is required to influence young people.* As the younger generation embraces new values, such as Marxism and Leninism, the older generation slowly loses control simply through attrition. *Again, true facts no longer matter during this stage, but rather creating perceptions are of paramount importance.* Communism and Religion Abolished - all religious and metaphysics is rejected. Engels and Lenin agreed that religion was a drug or “spiritual booze” and must be combated. To them, atheism put into practice meant *a “forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions.”* Eliminating American exceptionalism, fundamental change of national identity, structural deconstruction of foundational principles, elimination of religion. *Embedding a new societal design upon the psyche of generations through ideological academia, peer pressure by elites upon academics and society to convince that prior values were inherently flawed, racist, prejudiced etc. National identity is diluted with aspersions toward historical references. National History is re-written, re-defined, and molded to fit the new intended behavioral model and create the new values.* *“[T]he useful idiots, the leftists who are idealistically believing in the beauty of the Soviet socialist or Communist or whatever system,* when they get disillusioned, they become the worst enemies. That’s why my KGB instructors specifically made the point: never bother with leftists. Forget about these political prostitutes. Aim higher. [...] They serve a purpose only at the stage of destabilization of a nation. *For example, your leftists in the United States: all these professors and all these beautiful civil rights defenders. They are instrumental in the process of the subversion only to destabilize a nation. When their job is completed, they are not needed any more.* They know too much. Some of them, when they get disillusioned, when they see that Marxist-Leninists come to power-obviously they get offended-they think that they will come to power. That will never happen, of course. *They will be lined up against the wall and shot.”*
Rage Against the Machine is not necessarily factually inaccurate. The band's political views might be too quixotic to have much relevance in American politics but in mentioning power being in the hands of too few people they were not necessarily wrong. Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia were on the Supreme Court at the time this band was together. They split up in 2000 so the band had no way to know that Bush would get less than a majority of votes in 2000 and still win the electoral college or that the same would happen in 2016, in fact Trump got 303 electoral votes although Hillary Clinton beat him by 3 million kn the popular vote. The United States has not had the kinds of purges that Stalin and Mao created in their respective countries. In some ways, Josef Stalin was responsible for more people dying than Hitler was. For that matter, Mao's Great Leap Forward led to 30 million people dying either from starvation or from being executed due to the purge of "landlords." The landlords in the PRC were farmers who were punished for being more successful than their neighbors. If you look at the historical injustices, you can certainly make an indictment against the United States but some people simply disliked the band Rage Against the Machine for its supposed inability to convey a coherent message or for trying to send too many messages at once.
@@MilesPrower1992 0:01 to 0:11 = Bombtrack & Guerrilla Radio. 0:12 to 0:22 = Bombtrack. 0:23 to 0:27 = Killing In The Name. 0:28 to 1:10= Bulls on Parade & Wake Up. 1:11 to 1:21 = Freedom & Killing in the Name. 1:22 to 1:34 = Bombtrack. 1:35 to 1:45 = Know Your Enemy & Take The Power Back. 1:46 to 2:29 = Bulls on Parade & Wake Up. 2:30 to 2:39 = Freedom & Killing in the Name. 2:40 to 2:51 = Bombtrack. 2:52 to 3:01 = Freedom & Killing in the Name. 3:02 to 3:17 = Guerrilla Radio, Killing in the Name & Bullet in the Head. 3:18 to 3:51 = Bullet in the Head, Guerrilla Radio, Take the Power Back & Wake Up.
You can sometimes get 12 to 24 month financing at 0% on those. So about $100 a month. It is worth it... You won't have to buy a bed again in forever. What is the cost of 3 cheap beds, about 2k also?
2:13 Colorado (1876) became a state before Wyoming (1890). Why is Colorado getting sued when Wyoming ripped it off. Probably to make Weird Al seem stupid.
I listened to this with my headphones on max volume and now my ears hurt. Weird Al, you'll be hearing from my attorneys shortly
Yeah but you wont be hearing back
Mic 🎤 drop
He's gonna sue you for sueing him
@@someguy70 Well i ought a sue him for sueing me sueing him, my attorney’s name is Sue God damnit.
@@someguy70counter sue for frivolous lawsuit
" I sued toys r us because I swallowed a nerf ball "
The real reason toys r us went out of business because weird al sued them
Sorry, It got revived as "Geoffrey's Toy Box".
"And then I chocked to death"
You don't choke to death if toys r us comes back
Ya I’m from the future and I came to tell ya toys r us is gone now so u don’t need to do that
He had balls in his mouth because why ?
now that he mentions it, Colorado does look a bit too much like Wyoming
We were here first dammit!
or Wyoming looks like Colorado
Y’all Wyoming and Colorado to look the damn same 😂😂😂😂😂😂
I'm making the call right now
@@JABoyle3875 Wyoming has the cooler name
The fact that you can legitimately thrash and headband to this song really emphasis Weird Al's musical understanding without such a absurd and hilarious premise this song would not sound out of place on a Rage album.
"Headband" lol
It already doesn’t sound out of place in a rage album tbh
Headband? Wrong word buddy
@@tesseract5569 I’m talking about the specific Weird Al headband exclusive released on his Venezuelan tour in 1995 actually.
Correct, Rage Against the Machine has ZERO sense of humor, and even less factual accuracy.
Gonna sue weird Al cause I went to his concert 18years ago and I still can't stop laughing 😂😂😂
David Star have you stopped laughing yet
@@Selzor
I wish I could say no but........
🤣🤣🤣🤣🇺🇸🇺🇸😂😂😂😂😂🤪🤪🤪🤪🥵🤩🤩🤩😋😋😋😀😃😄😁😆😅😂🤣🤣🤣🤩😍😅😂😄😀😄
*18 years
Gonna sue Weird Al too, cause when he dressed up as Madonna at the concert I wenta, I got aroused. Gonna need that money for therapy.
@@DavysgravyStopped yet?
"I sued Verizon"
You know what? I can get behind that.
i sued verizon because the other caller couldn't hear me now.
I love how the verizon guy is the devil lol
@@rodneya7021 imagine going to hell after you die and the devil asking you if you can hear him now lol
280 likes
nice
I love how that like 2004 ad campaign is still so iconic lol
"I SUED BEN AFFLECK. DO I EVEN NEED A REASON?" -Fair point Al, you do you
How has this been here for a year with 21 likes but no comments?
@@metaversian2685 i mean he's right
I dont blame him...after batman v superman and showing his peepee in gone girl
@@marccram2664 Hey! Ben Affleck was one of the few good things about that mess, that warehouse scene is like a live action Arkham City
you sue you
"I sued Delta Airlines because they sold me a ticket to New Jersey, I went there- and it SUCKED"
No matter how many times I hear this song, this line will ALWAYS make me laugh out loud.
HAHAHAHAHHA
I was singing along and lost it at that line
@@quimeau i feel like no one is talking about the World Trade Center in the window 0:01
@@sethsmithLOUDNOISES lol
It’s the conviction in his voice lmao. I went there… and it SUCKED
And if I lose in court, I'll sue my lawyer.
👏
🤔
He is too smart to be kept alive
And will snitch like tekashi 6ix9ine
will you use that lawyer as your lawyer while suing your lawyer?
If anyone's wondering what the "original" is its kind of a medley of a few Rage Against The Machine songs, mainly Bombtrack with elements of Killing In The Name, Know Your Enemy and Bulls On Parade thrown in.
I feel like wake up is a better fit then bulls on parade
@@mikeydfas9 I don't see any Wake Up in this whatsoever my friend
Yeah, the "Burn, burn, yes, I'm gonna burn" chorus is unmistakable.
0:00 to 0:12 = Bombtrack & Guerrilla Radio.
0:13 to 0:26 = Bombtrack.
0:27 to 1:10= Bulls on Parade & Wake Up.
1:11 to 1:21 = Freedom & Killing in the Name.
1:22 to 1:34 = Bombtrack.
1:35 to 1:46 = Know Your Enemy.
1:47 to 2:30 = Bulls on Parade & Wake Up.
2:31 to 3:02 = Freedom & Killing in the Name.
3:03 to 3:16 = Killing in the Name, Freedom & Bullet in the Head.
3:17 to 3:51 = Bullet in the Head & Wake Up.
@@fzcbh4698 yup the part where he goes "sue, sue, yeah I'm gonna sue" is a play on "burn burn, yeah you're gonna burn" from Bombtrack
I sued TH-cam because I watched Jake Paul and I didn't like it
I sued youtube cause they have too many videos and I can't watch them all.
@@CurlyFromTheSwirly I sued TH-cam because you cant like something twice with one account
@@userhbiron1806, I'm suing because I can't like & dislike the same video. 😹
@@CurlyFromTheSwirly SAME, we gotta sue
@@userhbiron1806, yes we do, and I'm gonna sue you too.🤣
With the Gorilla glue girl incident this song is now relevant again
She isn't suing though?
@@PointsofData She was considering it, and even hired a lawyer
I'll glue ya
@Phoenix Puckett Excuse me?
@Phoenix Puckett So I'm assuming you like girls???? And you want me????
Funny thing is, he's describing actual lawsuits. I heard about a few of them.
Bodine v. Enterprise High School: Nineteen-year old falls through skylight while trying to steal gymnasium floodlights, sues school for injuries and wins. This is one of many court cases where a criminal sued the victim and one. It's really dumb, but sometimes it really does happen.
The coffee being spilled in the lap is definitely Stella Liebeck, but he's changed it from McDonalds to Starbucks.
"I'll sue ya if you even look at me funny" could be a reference to Prince, who constantly rejected Als offers to parody his music. At one point when they were both supposed to attend the American Music Awards, Prince had his lawyers send a letter to Al, telling him to not even look at Prince in the eye.
Paul Graves the coffee lawsuit was actually much worse than that
There is a video on youtube describing the wierdest lawsuits.
Negan's Evil Twin there are probably many.
“They sold me a ticket to New Jersey. I went there, and it sucked”
I've been there and it does suck tbh
You watched the video too? No way!
Dude that’s such a unique comment. 100 percent is from the video
@@lazyboi2373 He's gonna sue you for this
I live there, and yeah it has many flaws, such as high prices and traffic.
And it’s very dense LOL
I feel like no one is talking about his Teletubby tie
He’s probably suing everyone just to get attention cause nobody likes him cause he’s got zero sense of fashion
@@bigfatrockstar4991 dam o k
I believe He Bought it on EBay.
@@bigfatrockstar4991 Sounding like somebody jealous of the tie.
@@bigfatrockstar4991 I think it's very fashionable sir.
This is obviously in the style of RATM and I'm here for it! Al is an underrated musical genius, able to cross all genres.
That snare sounds fucking disgusting when the drummer unleashes on the heavy parts
The fact his guitarist can even come close to Tom's style tells us the talent in this band.
CORRECT
Not in the style. This is exactly RATM. I’m sure he got their permission. FU I won’t do what you tell me :)
Korn too
I sue gravity for pulling me down everytime i jump up
sorry, gravity is a governmental instiution that is paid for to make you stay to the ground, it is 100% legal for them to do this, sorry, please contact your local government for more information
I remember the last time the government was gridlocked and everything started floating away
Can't sue a theory.
You can't - gravity isn't real:
Why Gravity is NOT a Force
th-cam.com/video/XRr1kaXKBsU/w-d-xo.html
201 likes
nice
NOW I will sue you for no epilepsy warning
Bastian Jerome I had to cover the screen
I’ll sue you for making me waste my time because I’m reading you comment
Yeah man same I got a notification
They are grooving
(No offense)
Do people in Japan also sue sometimes? wonder if there was a lawsuit against the people that does the Pokemon Anime for that one episode and possible the news for showing the same scene again.
Scientology's theme song.
Note: I just got sued by Scientology for writing this comment..
Haha
No, you are forgetting about the religion that produces the most lawyers.
Note: I am allowed to make this joke I am Jewish.
lier
+Austin Stephens **liar
lol
It is sad though that the coffee lawsuit was referenced here. I really hope most people know the truth about that lawsuit by now. It wasn't frivolous, that elderly woman had 3rd degree genital burns. I'd sue McDonalds too.
It was just an easy win, seriously coffee has been hot since the beginning of coffee and she put the coffee in her lap
The truth is that she chose to place a 180 degree cup of coffee (in a paper cup) between her legs while being a passenger in a car. She spilled the cup into her lap. Her attorney argued that since is was hotter than a "normal cup of coffee" (175 degrees) McDonalds was negligent. Her injuries were real and sad but it wasn't McDonalds fault. Regardless of how painful an accident is, accepting responsibility, rather than blaming others for your choices, is the right thing to do. That's the whole point of this parody.
@@roses2155 two things: according to the official investigation, a difference of 5 degrees lowers the time to suffer third degree burns from 12+ seconds down to 3. and the coffee was 20 degrees hotter than it should've been, not 5 like you claimed.
seems so weird to me that you would pick the literal poster child of misrepresented lawsuits to defend? in any case, the right thing to do is doing even basic research on what you're trying to correct people over, Rose
@@roses2155 "The coffee was not just “hot,” but dangerously hot. McDonald’s corporate policy was to serve it at a temperature that could cause serious burns in seconds. Mrs. Liebeck’s injuries were far from frivolous. She was wearing sweatpants that absorbed the coffee and kept it against her skin. She suffered third-degree burns (the most serious kind) and required skin grafts on her inner thighs and elsewhere.
Liebeck’s case was far from an isolated event. McDonald’s had received more than 700 previous reports of injury from its coffee, including reports of third-degree burns, and had paid settlements in some cases.
Mrs. Liebeck offered to settle the case for $20,000 to cover her medical expenses and lost income. But McDonald’s never offered more than $800, so the case went to trial. The jury found Mrs. Liebeck to be partially at fault for her injuries, reducing the compensation for her injuries accordingly. But the jury’s punitive damages award made headlines - upset by McDonald’s unwillingness to correct a policy despite hundreds of people suffering injuries, they awarded Liebeck the equivalent of two days’ worth of revenue from coffee sales for the restaurant chain. That wasn’t, however, the end of it. The original punitive damage award was ultimately reduced by more than 80 percent by the judge."
TL;DR McDonald's knowingly brewed their coffee to a temperature that could _seriously damage someone within seconds_ AND HAD ACTUALLY INJURED HUNDREDS OF PEOPLE BEFORE THIS and *she won her case* , the dispute was the SETTLEMENT NOT WHO WAS AT FAULT
Hot coffee SHOULD NOT cause serious injuries just because you spill it on yourself!
Oh so people sue companies for their own stupidity
You could call it "Rage Algainst The Machine"
Ironically, that name would warrant a lawsuit! Lol!
More like Sue the machine
Would it? I'm pretty sure it would probably be fair use because of parody.
Suing in the name of!
177 likes
nice
Who ever disliked got sued by al
Can confirm, just did and a lawsuit just came in
@@benjagonzalez9940 about time
“Weird Al” Sued Albert. (Entertainment purposes)
Can we just stop for a moment and admire how awesomely he parodied Rage Against the Machine and what I can only guess as being a Bulls On Parade-inspired track? They even included a Tom Morello-like dude complete with his Arm the Homeless guitar!
*Arm the Lawyers!
@@belacickekl7579 no. Tom Morello’s iconic guitar has “Arm the Homeless” written on it.
@@MrMurdock86 In the video, the guitar is nicknamed "arm the lawyers" instead of "arm the homeless."
noo this is really closer to bomb-track
And now they do what they told ya is what I thought it sounded like
This is Weird Al’s most underrated song
So is virus alert and gump
And close but no cigar
All songs of Weird Al are underrated. Cos' all are masterpieces😁
Weird al should sue his fans for lost revenue
underrated- not rated or valued highly enough
If Rage Against the Machine doesn't cover this, I'm gonna sue.
Noah Leitch I actually can’t stand RAtM. Too communist.
@@noahleitch6367 Sad, but true. They are just lefties with the usual lefty rage and a whole lot of awesome shredding. Makes me sad....
@@LadyIarConnacht did u live in the ghetto and deal with the shit they dealt with?.
These comments didnt age well. Lmao Rage just announced they're going on tour. And how are they leftists?
@Maurice Fisher implying being a leftist is a bad thing
I'm a sue google + for not letting us read comments and forcing us to join!
That gives me an idea! I should sue Twitch for not letting me use the chat unless I sign in via FaceBook! I don't have a FaceBook account, nor do I want one! Thanks!
CaptainActually1 Then don't fucking use it genius. It's just a public IRC channel - Yes, IRC. You can access it using whichever program.
That's actually a good idea and a good reason!
Mansen it's a JOKE, moron
I sued Madonna for being old and still looking 25
Hats off to his backup band for pulling off RATM pretty damn well.
Ikr? I love RATM.
Its mostly him.
I could not figure what song this was
@@jacobefaber4952 he's not parodying an RATM song, he's parodying their style
Jacobe Faber He sometimes parodies styles. Germs Germs Germs sounds like nine inch nails.
Just found this on the Hot Coffee documentary
What are you doing here this is not osu
117 likes
mice
th-cam.com/video/KNWh6Kw3ejQ/w-d-xo.html
I don’t understand the comment
I wonder if the Switch release of GTA will have Hot Coffee, one can only hope
I sued Nintendo, cuz the joysticks on my Joycons drift
ooF
Thought you were gonna sue them for the N64 controller joystick ripping your palm skin off playing mario party
Northeasthotdog NEHD make it into a rhyme.
I think that happened before. I had stopped playing the Switch but now i play Animal Crossing New Horizons and Blazblue Cross Tag Battle online
WD-40, if you still need the advice :p
"If you deliver my pizza 30 seconds late!!!!" Favourite part :)
Me to
It’s sad how true that is
69th like
“Wise man say, forgiveness is divine, but never pay full price for late pizza.”
Swegta pog
While most are bogus, the one about spraging his ankle while he's robbing your place has really happened before. And people have won settlements for getting hurt while robbing people's homes. Disgusting that the justice system rewards criminals like that.
Actually, most of them ate true, they are only worded differently. For instance the part with frappuino and StarBucks. In the original lawsuit the woman sued McDonalds because, while she was holding the cup in between her legs in a car, she spilled hot coffee on her lap and got second and third degree burns.
which is why you wanna live in a state with castle law doctrine!
rafael502 And to make sure your a good shot. If you must defend yourself, go for a headshot. A dead person can't sue you.
A Chinese guy sued his wife because she gave him ugly children and god knows how he won
ANTONY bell Because, China. I mean, after all, he can only have ONE child. Think about it....
I love how Weird Al addresses the need for justice at the end of this video and at the end of First World Problems.
yeah... even nature ain't just, f...k fake justice warriors
The sad thing is that there are people who actually think like this.
EariosRandomness
I'm suing you because I'm taking the time to write this reply on your comment
craigers37 Oh yeah? Well I countersue you for commenting here to begin with!
Romario Desrosier, I’m suing you because your suing me
craigers37 Fine, I'll see you in court! *dresses in tennis outfit*
"If you deliver my pizza... 30 seconds late..!" Sounds like me when I'm having a mental breakdown.
Japan: Hold my beer
This is one of Weird Al's best parodies. It's so close to reality...
It’s a “style parody.” Sometimes he parodies a band’s sound without copying any specific themes or riffs from them. “Dog Eat Dog” is a Talking Heads style parody. “Dare to Be Stupid” is a Devo style parody. “Germs” is a Nine Inch Nails style parody.
Sometimes it’s hard to tell. Is “You Don’t Love Me Anymore” a style parody of Extreme, or is it a full original? “Where’s Johnny” turned out to be a specific song parody but until I heard the song it was parodying, I thought it was a Scritti Politti style parody.
It's. Not a parody
@@felicity4711 I believe another term is pastiche
Correct, Rage Against the Machine has ZERO sense of humor, and even less factual accuracy.
Bruh he pretty much predicted the Karen’s
i know that the lady suing mcdonalds pretty much became a meme about frivolous lawsuits, but she legit got third degree burns on her legs. totally unnecessary for it to be that hot.
McDonald's put a ton of money into having the media disparage her afterwards. It's a big part of why we have this myth of out of control frivolous lawsuits.
My five-year-old son burned down my apartment after playing with matches, so of course I sued MTV. What, you expect me to take responsibility for what my kids watch? That's the TV's job.
Parental Advisory In. nutshell
+javon lilly Trump in a Nutshell
lol yup
Lol Beavis And Butthead
Are you homeless, now? Or is this a joke?
Awsome parody of rage against the machine
0:01 to 0:11 = Bombtrack & Guerrilla Radio.
0:12 to 0:22 = Bombtrack.
0:23 to 0:27 = Killing In The Name.
0:28 to 1:10= Bulls on Parade & Wake Up.
1:11 to 1:21 = Freedom & Killing in the Name.
1:22 to 1:34 = Bombtrack.
1:35 to 1:45 = Know Your Enemy & Take The Power Back.
1:46 to 2:29 = Bulls on Parade & Wake Up.
2:30 to 2:39 = Freedom & Killing in the Name.
2:40 to 2:51 = Bombtrack.
2:52 to 3:01 = Freedom & Killing in the Name.
3:02 to 3:17 = Guerrilla Radio, Killing in the Name & Bullet in the Head.
3:18 to 3:51 = Bullet in the Head, Guerrilla Radio, Take the Power Back & Wake Up.
I'll sue you for spelling AWESOME wrong.
@@thisismagacountry1318 what the name
@@renhey9979 Something I borrowed from Jussie Smollett.
I sued my doctor because he told me to go to a mental hospital
*I went there and it sucked*
To be fair, that seems like a valid reason to sue someone, depending on how much the mental hospital sucked.
@@rebca_ not really since crazy people can't represent themselves so I'm suing the court for letting him sue the mental hospital. Also who let this guy out of the mental hospital? I'm suing the hospital.
I mean conditions in some mental hospitals are definitely _actually_ lawsuit-worthy, or at least they used to be. People deserve human rights regardless of how their brains are working!
@@greatpower6063 I'm suing you, 5 months later, for calling mentally ill people crazy. I expect a $150 million dollar windfall.
121 likes
nice
The fact that I still know the lyrics and it’s been years since I’ve watched this yeah these videos are GOLD✨
I sued united airlines because they sold me a ticket to New Jersey I went there and it sucked!
Rofl..
Lol
Would it work? xD
And now they are being sued for a totally different reason.
I dunno, Atlantic City isn't that bad and every gas station is full service!
But he should have known it sucks
I had a seizure from this video, I'm suing.
+Paul Power But i'm gonna sue you
Avi Mehra Noooo, my money!!!
+Paul Power - I'm gonna sue you too!
rahkin rah whhhhhhhhyyyyyyyy
+Paul Power -'cause your company produced that hair drrrdddyeeyerrr!! This video is funny as S#^$!
I love Rage Against the Machine, which makes this even funnier XD
Pegasi A parody like this of metalica woulda been good.
What song is it a parody of?
Guitarmaster60 Pretty similar to Killing in the Name - RATM
@ 0:40 the lawyer is playing Morello's guitar XD
Metal Warrior This is a style parody of RATM, not of a specific song
The fact that this man can take a song so comical and give it a beat that you can genuinely rock out to just show's this man's musical ability.
"I sued Delta Airlines coz they sold me a ticket to New Jersey. I went there and it SUCKED! Yeeeaaaahh!"
Best line because NJ does SUCK!
"if i hurt my knuckles... when i punch you in the face!"
And have you even been there?
I find that offensive im gonna sue you
To those who discuss the Liebeck v. McDonalds case (1984) below, Ms. Liebeck became the poster child for American lawsuits gone haywire--unnecessarily so. There was great vitriol and spite for this poor soul. Most people don't realize that this martyr (she became one in that case) is responsible for the cup holders in our cars today. Thanks to her bravery, we don't have to risk the same, painful fate--and YES (!) it was quite painful. I saw pictures of her THIRD degree burns, which required she undergo an operation. At the time of her painful and quite serious injuries, there was NO place to put the cup due to the car-design (and car designs, in general). Moreover, the car was parked--NOT moving. She was the passenger. Originally, she ONLY wanted McD's to pay her medical bills--AND LOWER THE COFFEE TEMPERATURE, which was HOTTER than industry STANDARDS. That's it! They arrogantly refused to respect her wishes, and she pressed on. McD's REFUSED to lower the temperature notwithstanding the fact that HUNDREDS of people ALREADY gave McD's notice that they were injured during a given time--when the injuries were recorded. And, by the way, NO, Ms. Liebeck did NOT gain millions of dollars. A trial court judge reduced her original verdict amount--given to her at the hands of a horrified jury to ONLY $640,000 (having seen the pictures, you know what I mean by "only"). It was a David v. Goliath case of arrogance--and a concerned citizen who refused to just knuckle under. Yes, folks, this poor lady pressed on because she didn't want to see ANYONE ELSE suffer that fate. Rather than enviously looking at her with disdain, perhaps people should educate themselves on the true facts behind the Liebeck v. McDonald's story. Thank you, Ms. Liebeck. May you RIP.
I saw that on Netflix too....
Pedro DuhHusky Hi Pedro. Thanks for your most inquisitive reply. For a company to need changes due to people getting hurt is equivocated with negligence according to Tort law. Thus, as a matter of law, McDonalds would be held to be negligent if they were found to be selling coffee that is significantly hotter than industry standards. A company is held to a reasonableness standard. If they are found to be selling coffee that is unreasonably hot--hotter than industry standards--then they are found to be negligent. Moreover, if the company has had notice of hundreds (that we know of at a certain time) of people getting burned and they refused to change it, that is a problem. (People will continue getting hurt without changes.) Importantly, in personal injury law, there are damages for pain and suffering. Admittedly, this is balanced against the negligence of the Plaintiff. However, where a product is dangerous enough that many people are getting hurt with it--and the company has received notice after notice, such that they are well-aware of the volume of injuries--then it becomes a problem for the company (this can be seen in products liability cases also, with dangerous and defective designs).
Nevertheless, American law compensates people for pain and suffering (I think this is where you may have the issue--but it is our law, and I do agree that if something can help end human suffering then I am all for it). Also, judges award punitive damages to deter Defendants from committing the same type of acts repeatedly. The fact that defendants pay out punitive damages acts to deter others from wrongful acts, such as those that unnecessarily hurt people. By the way, punitive damages are not restricted to hurting people. There was a case involving Denny's and ONE (if I remember correctly) alleged racial comment (about someone looking out of place--where it was the INSINUATION where the problem lay) led to a MULTI-MILLION DOLLAR payout. Nobody got hurt. Yep, sticks and stones may break bones--but in law if one goes after a member of a federally protected class (i.e., racial, religion, gender etc.) then they are playing with proverbial fire. While that would not have been the verdict prior to 1964, it is law now. It is meant to deter oppression.
Getting back to Liebeck, if we can do something to deter needless human suffering--and companies tend to listen when they have to pay--then it is a needed deterrent. If you haven't seen the pictures of Ms. Liebeck, Google them: You will be horrified--and you will agree that no human being should need to undergo what amounts to unspeakable horror at the extremes of what is torture, and conceivably, the limits of what human suffering could possibly be (it really is so much worse than "just" a coffee burn). Bottom line? Laws are meant to afford justice to victims--and to prevent or deter human suffering.
Pedro DuhHusky If you have a hammer, that you bought, and you crush your foot with it, THAT'S YOUR PROBLEM. How can a hammer company fix a problem with a hammer, IT'S A HAMMER. Lawsuits are mostly people who feel they should not be held responsible for their own actions. Companies should not be sued for the incompetence of society.
.
Matt Ricketts You ramble on incoherently and nobody could make sense of your POORLY WRITTEN rant, FOOL--the only "DUMB SHIT" is YOU!! BTW, that was LEGAL standards, STOOPID shit!! When you learn to respect others perhaps you'll get treated likewise. Talk to the HAND!!
No one:
Karens and and her bratty kids:
onmy computer2020gal i think its called a todd. I don’t know tho
onmy computer2020gal actually, a Chad is a man that can get women interested in him, and treats them with respect. And a Chad treats everyone equally, no matter their background.
onmy computer2020gal the thing is, women tend to be governed by pure emotion and little else. Finding a woman who isn’t dominated by emotions is...
Easier to find than a unicorn but harder than winning the lottery.
onmy computer2020gal called a Kevin
It’s a joke not a dick don’t take it so hard
0:13 I didn't know that Xi Jinping was a weird Al fan
anyway Al is sueing him
alyankovicVEVO and I'll sue you for not putting epilepsy warnings on this video. Prepare to lose millions.
+bennemann Having someone cause you seizures is not a frivolous lawsuit. not comparable.
***** Which is why a seizure lawsuit is not comparable. The reason for notification laws on flashing lights is because without some notice it is impossible to avoid them and it really can kill someone with seizures. I get the point, which is why I am saying that is not the same issue.
+TearisShatteredMoon You must be fun at parties.
+Failing Tacos Lol.
I think the most interesting part of this is that, unlike the lawsuits in the song, a lawsuit about epilepsy warnings is actually completely justified, seeing as seizures can be fatal. Irony, man...
Missed an oppertunity to have the line "I sued my lawyer because he said that lawsuit would never hold up"
Reminds me of a broadcast of an Adventures in Odyssey program, a lawyer won a lawsuit so spectacularly that he became so in-demand that he couldn’t take on every client that approached him so he got sued for that
@@drewbaker2336 oh man, I never thought I'd come across someone who also grew up with adventures in odyssey. Though I don't remember that episode. But it could be because it's been years since I listened to the program.
@@drewbaker2336 Bart actually did threaten to sue him after they... Technically won, I guess.. Wonder what the writers would think of this song... That episode came out in 1995.
Fine Bros official theme.
+naglfar31 it's chill, they've dropped it all now
+naglfar31 *_HILARIOUS AND ORIGINAL_*
soooo original
+naglfar31 I don't get it.
Why is that nobody who even understands what Fine Bros was trying to is making jokes about them, yes they were trying to own that industry on youtube but they were going to provide resources and views, it was basically a huge business deal that due to the numbers of uneducated people on youtube fell down immediately.
0:37 that is a wild reference
What's it a reference to?
@@xetra3245a dude who microwaved his cat (or many people are evil)
Please rise for what should be our national anthem.
Now I realized why so many companies were going out of business, he almost sued everything.
I sued Harvey Weinstein! ....
Ah do I even need a reason?
I thought it was Ben Affleck
@@petrolmonkey1973 it was.
Here's one He's a sexual preditor.
No
@@loganmansiongames I'll sue you for spelling Predator wrong. Arnold Schwarzenegger is joining the lawsuit for you not watching Predator.
I like how the guitar has "Arm The Lawyers" painted on it. 1:34 for a good shot.
It's a reference to Rage Against The Machine's guitarist having "Arm the homeless" on his guitar.
"If I sprain my ankle, while I'm robbing your place,
if I hurt my knuckles, when I punch you in the face,''
Sounds like the UK except you actually go to jail AND get sued.
Was going to jail for not having a robbery license
It's funny because a man sprained his ankle while robbing a school. The man filed a lawsuit too.
@@tanyarickman3600 tf is there to rob from a school loool
@@RBLXDignitysHQ school equipement, Laptops, Projectors
This also happened in Texas i think is the one hes directing it too
saw him last week in Buffalo, they played this. the entire band just absolutely killed it. it was incredible.
As a foreigner, this is the song that helped me learn where Wyoming and Colorado are. Thanks Al!
As a US citizen, I always think of this video when I'm trying to remember which one is which
@@andrewgust-anderson5612 As a Coloradan, I'm offended. I'ma gonna sue!
But not New Jersey...
@@chucku00 Nobody cares where New Jersey is.
This song has outlasted many of the companies Al references in it.
Keemstar.
YEP
I'd watch your back man....He is lerking
ALEX IS A STUPID....
+Darkhalo314 nibbler
Basically everyone in America
he's right though people sue for some of the stupidest reasons
I should sue you for that comment!!!
Josh Thompson I think you're trying to be funny but in this day and age it's impossible to tell
Just a joke sir. Just a joke.
Josh Thompson I should sue ya for suing about people sueing for stupid reasons!
In the USA, that is.
I'll sue him because this didn't have an epileptic warning
Team Pixelators dont be a bitch
I was reminded of the coffee lawsuit where a McDonald's would serve boiling coffee (300°F) in a faulty cup and when a granny suffered legitimate burns they made a PR campaign to make her seem like the bad guy.
180-190 °F (82-88 °C) not 148.889 °C which would basically be just steam that point lol
Water evaporates at various temperatures, but it boils and turns into vapor at 100°C (212°F) at standard atmospheric pressure (1 atm). However, evaporation can occur at lower temperatures as well, depending on factors like humidity and air movement.
Correction, it was between 180 to 190 degrees fahrenheit and McDonald's eventually was forced to admit to it.
Also, the boiler for the coffee is shut to not let the water out as coffee soaks and dilutes the water. Before trying to say "But that's impossible? It would be steam! Yes, that's why you see steam when you make coffee. Google it before and double check the dude you're trying to disprove isn't actually right before trying to quote one fact to disprove the whole thing he said.
Karen's theme song
I went there and it SUUUUUUUCKED!
YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
Where?
@@micahmaitles830 there
jugglingembalmer should’ve gone to AAAAAAAALBUQUERQUE.
*People from New Jersey have left the chat*
The american dream...
To be rear ended by a Mercedes.
3:34, your right! that murican flag in the background.
Donald trump in a nutshell
I sued Alyankovic for suing me.
That's called a Counter Sue, and is actually a perfectly legal response for a false Lawsuit.
Evnyofdeath I learn more in the comment section of youtube than i did in school
James Alexander Isn't that a shame?
outatis ater Yah, that's what we got for being high all the time in high school.But can you blame me? IT'S CALLED HIGH SCHOOL FOUR FUCK'S SAKE, I THOUGHT I WAS MEANT TO SMOKE WEED
I sued a suer for sueing my mom for sueing his dad for sueing this grandma
I SUE HUMANITY.
true dat
lol
is that even possible ?
+beautiful reality yes
lol
Sue Ben Affeck for playing Batman.
Wonderful song about the 2000-2010 era; the so-called "Era of stupid lawsuits"
Let's hope people learned something from it.
I'll sue Weird Al cuz I was watching this video while driving and I got in a car crash and died. I'm using my spirit computer to write this. *I wonder how to file a lawsuit from the grave...*
A Sueance maybe?
Buddy Johnston I'm going to sue you because that pun was terrible and gave me prostate cancer.
Fuck you I'm sueing you for using my name in a comment without my consent
Buddy Johnston
I'm going to sue you for wanting to sue me without consent
Arman Kordi I'm gonna sue you because All told me to.
I wish we *could* sue stores for putting up the Xmas decorations *BEFORE HALLOWEEN*!
I'd be happy enough if the Legion could sue them for dishonoring veterans by putting up decorations before Remembrance Day (Veterans' Day in the US).
Chris Hennick can a person be sued for hanging nazzi decorations on hes balcony on the fourth of july? i wonder.
silimon4 It would bother me much less than seeing Hallmark's Christmas commercials in *SEPTEMBER.*
It's a little better now. The stores have Halloween and Christmas decorations for sale at the same time. Thanksgiving should sue stores for forgetting about it's existence.
This song explains a good chunk of Americans.
I dabbled in law and only a few of these laws suits might make it into court. which is the whole point of the song, giving bad reasons to lawsuit. going back to my main point when everybody in the crowd jumped him I could see that going to court and winning. I think I saw some where in the comments about some one hurting themselves while robbing then sueing. and some people have claimed the act of self defense which I believe he said "if I hurt my knuckle while punching you in the face" he could easily claim self defense.
***** if they get a bad rep. most people won't want to either buy what ever they are selling, work there because of its reputation, and finally a lot of the press will try to dig deeper and get more dirt on them, to bash it. some of these companies can pay it off without hassle so its better to pay it off now then take it to court and have a chance of losing even more money.
***** ditto
Same
Marshall Gorgan
rusty zaremba
*****
how many courts have you been to where THIS was the case??!! with little things like this press and others don't usually announce this stuff, meaning YOU would have to be in the actual court.
Trump rn
Anybody opposed to making this the new American Anthem?
+googolplex³
I most certainly am not opposed to that. After all, we'd be honest for a change :-)
cuz everyone sues for stupid reasons
haha!! That's sad that it would be a perfect fit.
We have the same issue with the judiciary system being misused here in the UK too.
I dis-liked the video...and got sued.
But what if I'll sue you for suing me?
Then he'll sue you back for the stress you caused...you can't win. The only way to win is to be the one who sues first.
Sueception
hell sue you for suing him for suing you but then ill sue you for suing him for suing you but then youll sue me for suing you for suing him for suing you but then he'll think thats not right so he'll sue you for suing me for suing you for suing him but then i wouldnt like it if he tried to defend me so id sue him for suing you for suing me for suing you for suing him but then he'll sue me for not leting him defend me from you suing me for suing you for suing him but then id sue you for starting this whole suing contest but then you would sue me becuase you think im trying to look tough but then the judges in court would sue us for having a suing contest for no reason but then ill sue the judges for hurting my fellings by suing me for suing you for suing him for suing me for suing you for suing him
He'll sue you for suing for suing you
i sue both of you then move Russia there for i win
Not only is this insanely funny, it's also such a good song to listen to.
"I sued Taco Bell, cause I ate half a million chalupas and I got fat" HAHAHAH
I sued Panasonic
They never said I shouldn’t use their microwave to dry off my cat.
Kevin Johnson and now panasonic says on its microwaves: warning don’t put cat in microwave
@@saklee1777 no cats in microwave!
@@saklee1777 when i was younger I had a Samsung tablet and in the instructions manual it said "do not put in the microwave"
@@KevinJohnson-rc8dw Stuff like this is why a lot of frozen pizzas say to take it out of the box before you put the pizza in the oven.
Entitled Parent: This song is so relatable.
Karen's when they realise the person their talking to is the managers:
*Karens
Apostrophes are for contraction or possessive nouns, not pluralizing.
*they're (contraction of "THEY aRE")
their: for possession
there: for all other uses
*the manager (singular)
managers = plural
@@alvallac2171 🎼 Word crimes
Al's Suing Reasons:
Eating half a million chalupas and getting fat. (Taco Bell)
Using Panasonic's microwave to dry off his cat. (Panasonic)
Calling EarthLink and being put on hold. (Earthlink)
Spilling a cold Frappuccino on his lap. (Starbucks)
Swallowing a Nerf ball and nearly choking to death. (Toys "R" Us)
Eating a bag of kitty litter and getting bad breath. (Petco)
Putting his finger down in a bottle of Coca-Cola and getting it stuck. (The Coca-Cola Company)
Buying a ticket to New Jersey, going there, and finding out that it sucks. (Delta Air Lines)
Shoving a Duracell's AA right up his nose. (Duracell)
Buying a Home Depot's hammer and dropping it on his toes. (Home Depot)
Taking a bath with his laptop, causing it to stop working. (Dell Computers)
Looking like a jerk when he wearing Fruit of the Loom's tightie-whities on his head. (Fruit of the Loom)
Getting all depressed every time his cellphone is roaming. (Verizon)
It looks too much like Wyoming. (The state of Colorado)
Neiman Marcus putting up their Christmas decorations way out of season. (Neiman Marcus)
He wanted to sue Ben Affleck, claiming that he didn't even need a reason to do so.
In Brazil, if any thief hurt himself while in your house, he can sue you and they usually win.
you can do that in almost any state in the U.S. only a couple states have laws that prevent that.
one of my friends got sued in Massachusetts by a burglar he broke a leg climbing through her window (didn't see the coffee table under it) and he won over $30,000!
it is sad
Please tell me you're joking .-.
Toomnyusernae nope
America: the song
King of Rock n’ Roll = Elvis
King of Pop = Michael Jackson
King of Heavy Metal = Ozzy Osbourne
God of Rap = Eminem
King of Parodies = Weird Al Yankovic
You forgot: God of metal= Lemmy Killmeister
@@rogamernl3894 no
Yes exact
I agree with most, but King of Metal is clearly Dio.
Hey u be a god of something
Nintendo: "I sued Palworld, cause they infringed on our patent of capturing creatures in little spheres."
This one aged poorly with what we know about "frivolous lawsuits" PR smear campaigns.
Ya the joke about how he was gonna sue Starbucks because he spilt a cold Frappuccino on his lap, did not age well...
In fairness I don’t think the point was to say that all lawsuits are stupid, and there are a lot of ridiculous law suits out there. Still, yeah the coffee bit hasn’t aged well.
@@BLZ231 second degree burns from a coffee... Fucking hell.
@@BLZ231 no this song is specifically mocking frivolous lawsuits, so including that bit is saying the hot coffee lawsuit was frivolous
this song is a 100% correct reprasentation of higher class people in the U.S
once a dude sued the family of kid he hit and killed for leaving a dent in the car from the bike the kid was riding guess what.............. He Won.....That Dickbag FUCKING WON
TylerTheGamer WTF
One time I was in line at a store register and there was this Hispanic girl in front of me and she walked up to the register. Some uptight white douchebag acted like he was in front of her and started freaking out. She calmly told him to calm down and stepped away. He then said while waiting for the cashier to ring him up, "I know you don't see white people". Now this is enough for him to deserve to get beat up, but she calmly walked up and he freaked out and started saying not to touch him and she would be arrested for assault and he'd sue her or something. Id like to mention this very patient lady was probably half his size and not even doing anything an he was threatening to call the cops. He was asking the cashier if she saw that and if she would do something and all this bullcrap. People lie that just as one example really need to grow a pair. I hate the fact that if he got a good lawyer he probably could have sued that poor lady. It's also completely ridiculous that you can sue for hurting yourself while breaking into someone's house. If you are breaking into someone's house, you should be prepared to get SHOT, not be thinking, well if I get caught, I can just pretend to get hurt and sue them. People like that just drive me crazy.
Damnnnn dude
al is raging against dat machine.
im trying to remember what music this is remixed;
it almost sounds like killing in the name.
Why is this not the American national anthem?
Arent you that "writer"?
Tobey Plug Yea, I'm also that guy in a grave.
+Ronald Hubbard I could just picture that at a sporting event.
"Please rise and remove your hats for our national anthem."
*Pure silence, then suddenly...*
"I'LL SUE YA! I'LL TAKE ALL YOUR MONEY!"
lol true the land of the free to sue thee
***** Nor am I.
This is the best RATM song never made by RATM. Did tom or anyone from the band ever publicly comment on this song? Al is a seriously good musician and this works as a great original song.
Correct, Rage Against the Machine has ZERO sense of humor, and even less factual accuracy.
@@scottdoesntmatter4409 That's because they, like many Leftists, have been indoctrinated by Marxists.
Step one of the "Four Steps for Communist Ideological Subversion" (Yuri Bezmenov, 1985)
Demoralization - this is a process which can take about 15-30 years to perform (a generation). *During this stage, the moral fibre and integrity of the country is put into question, thereby creating doubt in the minds of the people. To do so, manipulation of the media and academia is required to influence young people.* As the younger generation embraces new values, such as Marxism and Leninism, the older generation slowly loses control simply through attrition. *Again, true facts no longer matter during this stage, but rather creating perceptions are of paramount importance.*
Communism and Religion
Abolished - all religious and metaphysics is rejected. Engels and Lenin agreed that religion was a drug or “spiritual booze” and must be combated. To them, atheism put into practice meant *a “forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions.”*
Eliminating American exceptionalism, fundamental change of national identity, structural deconstruction of foundational principles, elimination of religion. *Embedding a new societal design upon the psyche of generations through ideological academia, peer pressure by elites upon academics and society to convince that prior values were inherently flawed, racist, prejudiced etc. National identity is diluted with aspersions toward historical references. National History is re-written, re-defined, and molded to fit the new intended behavioral model and create the new values.*
*“[T]he useful idiots, the leftists who are idealistically believing in the beauty of the Soviet socialist or Communist or whatever system,* when they get disillusioned, they become the worst enemies. That’s why my KGB instructors specifically made the point: never bother with leftists. Forget about these political prostitutes. Aim higher. [...] They serve a purpose only at the stage of destabilization of a nation. *For example, your leftists in the United States: all these professors and all these beautiful civil rights defenders. They are instrumental in the process of the subversion only to destabilize a nation. When their job is completed, they are not needed any more.* They know too much. Some of them, when they get disillusioned, when they see that Marxist-Leninists come to power-obviously they get offended-they think that they will come to power. That will never happen, of course. *They will be lined up against the wall and shot.”*
Rage Against the Machine is not necessarily factually inaccurate. The band's political views might be too quixotic to have much relevance in American politics but in mentioning power being in the hands of too few people they were not necessarily wrong. Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia were on the Supreme Court at the time this band was together. They split up in 2000 so the band had no way to know that Bush would get less than a majority of votes in 2000 and still win the electoral college or that the same would happen in 2016, in fact Trump got 303 electoral votes although Hillary Clinton beat him by 3 million kn the popular vote. The United States has not had the kinds of purges that Stalin and Mao created in their respective countries. In some ways, Josef Stalin was responsible for more people dying than Hitler was. For that matter, Mao's Great Leap Forward led to 30 million people dying either from starvation or from being executed due to the purge of "landlords." The landlords in the PRC were farmers who were punished for being more successful than their neighbors. If you look at the historical injustices, you can certainly make an indictment against the United States but some people simply disliked the band Rage Against the Machine for its supposed inability to convey a coherent message or for trying to send too many messages at once.
This is Rage Against the Machine parody. Just if you are wondering
What song?
It's not a parody of any one song in particular. It's just a parody of the band in general.
Honestly, this could be a Rage song even with these lyrics.
@@MilesPrower1992
0:01 to 0:11 = Bombtrack & Guerrilla Radio.
0:12 to 0:22 = Bombtrack.
0:23 to 0:27 = Killing In The Name.
0:28 to 1:10= Bulls on Parade & Wake Up.
1:11 to 1:21 = Freedom & Killing in the Name.
1:22 to 1:34 = Bombtrack.
1:35 to 1:45 = Know Your Enemy & Take The Power Back.
1:46 to 2:29 = Bulls on Parade & Wake Up.
2:30 to 2:39 = Freedom & Killing in the Name.
2:40 to 2:51 = Bombtrack.
2:52 to 3:01 = Freedom & Killing in the Name.
3:02 to 3:17 = Guerrilla Radio, Killing in the Name & Bullet in the Head.
3:18 to 3:51 = Bullet in the Head, Guerrilla Radio, Take the Power Back & Wake Up.
@@fzcbh4698 Thank you. That explains why it sounds like RatM, but I can't place which song it was.
after all this time i just realized ... this is a spoof of rage against the machine 😩😩
I thought it sounded a lot like Killing in the Name Of
Can't be RATM. Not enough grunting.
@@campbellsoup93 OOOOOOH WHA-AH-AH-AH!
Sorry that's disturbed, it just felt right
They should sue him for copyright violation
@Léo Legrosnono isn't there a law that protects all parodies?
This is literally a sum up of every judges dumbest cases.
Donald Trump's favorite song.
He is a fairly litigious fella. And that's the understatement of the day.
I sued the air because it was 74 degrees and I fainted
That isn’t hot
christian Lawrence Confused Europeans in 5.... 4..... 3...
DUDE THATS EXTREAMLY HOT
I think he means 74°C
@@NVC77 then he should've spoecified Celcius
Ill sue my bed coz i havent had a good sleep in ages
Get a temperpedic....
Edward Rhoads, do you have 2 thousand dollars she can borrow than? And me too?
You can sometimes get 12 to 24 month financing at 0% on those. So about $100 a month. It is worth it... You won't have to buy a bed again in forever. What is the cost of 3 cheap beds, about 2k also?
…I sued Leo Tolstoy ’cause I read _War & Peace_ and it had too many pages!
2:13 Colorado (1876) became a state before Wyoming (1890). Why is Colorado getting sued when Wyoming ripped it off. Probably to make Weird Al seem stupid.
1:06
Wouldn't it make more sense to sue New Jersey?