The First-Ever Cargo Ship Powered By Green Fuel | Morten Bo Christiansen | TED

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ก.ค. 2024
  • The shipping industry is vital to the global economy, but it's also a huge contributor to the climate crisis. Morten Bo Christiansen, a leader of the energy transition for the global shipping company A.P. Moller-Maersk, talks to TED's Lindsay Levin about the launch of the first-ever cargo ship powered by green methanol, the industry's urgent need to shift away from fossil fuels -- and what it could all mean for people's pockets.
    Countdown is TED's global initiative to accelerate solutions to the climate crisis. The goal: to build a better future by cutting greenhouse gas emissions in half by 2030, in the race to a zero-carbon world. Get involved at countdown.ted.com/sign-up
    Learn more about #TEDCountdown:
    Twitter: / tedcountdown
    Instagram: / tedcountdown
    Facebook: / ted
    Website: countdown.ted.com
    If you love watching TED Talks like this one, become a TED Member to support our mission of spreading ideas: ted.com/membership
    Follow TED!
    Twitter: / tedtalks
    Instagram: / ted
    Facebook: / ted
    LinkedIn: / ted-conferences
    TikTok: / tedtoks
    The TED Talks channel features talks, performances and original series from the world's leading thinkers and doers. Subscribe to our channel for videos on Technology, Entertainment and Design - plus science, business, global issues, the arts and more. Visit TED.com to get our entire library of TED Talks, transcripts, translations, personalized talk recommendations and more.
    Watch more: go.ted.com/mortenbochristiansen
    • The First-Ever Cargo S...
    TED's videos may be used for non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons License, Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives (or the CC BY - NC - ND 4.0 International) and in accordance with our TED Talks Usage Policy: www.ted.com/about/our-organiz.... For more information on using TED for commercial purposes (e.g. employee learning, in a film or online course), please submit a Media Request at media-requests.ted.com
    #TED #TEDTalks #energy
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 73

  • @mantaray2239
    @mantaray2239 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Methanol is costly and may or may not be from green sources. And it must be burned to produce energy. But the environmental benefits of wind are unmistakable. And wind costs nothing.

    • @essbing
      @essbing 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Wind is not feasible. As in sails. Not when you have a ship that’s many times larger with a much larger payload. It would be a near impossible task that would take forever to reach its destination.

  • @terrihasstedt5855
    @terrihasstedt5855 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    The industry is trying that is more than many others, he never said they would not keep trying that this is their sole solution. Don't bash them down when they are just trying to move forward to benefit all of us. Help keeping them and others as they move forward.

    • @andreafiorini6418
      @andreafiorini6418 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This is a scam. I am tired of seeing my intelligence insulted

    • @user-wp8yx
      @user-wp8yx 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Think about it. This guy is with a huge shipping company that has an almost monopoly on shipping to Europe. He has created a solution that he has stated they don't have enough fuel for. And who needs to pick up the bill? "We all do" he says. He's looking for a handout of public funds. This is a sales pitch for a technology that doesn't work.

    • @samuelzev4076
      @samuelzev4076 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@user-wp8yxit may appear that it doesn’t work now but give it time then eventually progress will be made and it becomes mainstream just like aeroplanes were considered silly ideas until they reach flight

    • @claudiojopiavilches5169
      @claudiojopiavilches5169 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@user-wp8yxthen they'll pocket the profits and tax-payer funds to only rule out the project as unfeasible

    • @samuelzev4076
      @samuelzev4076 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@andreafiorini6418mobile phones were also seen as stupid too, they were big chunky blocks back then but now everyone uses them. Perhaps your idea of intelligence needs to be re-examined, sounds like willful ignorance

  • @SpamMouse
    @SpamMouse 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Somewhat discounted decades of wind powered sailing ships that first explored and traversed the globe hundreds of years ago!

  • @JustinDeRosa
    @JustinDeRosa 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Ted. Marketing worth fact-checking.

  • @WeylandLabs
    @WeylandLabs 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Well its a start ! 🔋👍

  • @JolanScott
    @JolanScott 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Well that’s just not true. The world has seen hundreds of nuclear ships and submarines. 0 emissions.

    • @TLSH12
      @TLSH12 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      people always ignore nuclear

    • @julianshepherd2038
      @julianshepherd2038 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Most people think nuclear power is best on solid land.

  • @TheAgiovannym
    @TheAgiovannym 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Cool. What happens when you have a brown out ?

  • @HappySlappii
    @HappySlappii 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    Putting green in front of the word methanol doesn't make it green because it comes from biofuel which is made from burning wood pulp generally...

    • @TLSH12
      @TLSH12 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      so in simple terms, the "clean" fuel they are talking about is made by burning wood pulp, thus emitting carbon anyways?

    • @julianshepherd2038
      @julianshepherd2038 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@TLSH12you replant the trees. We do that in Europe.

    • @TLSH12
      @TLSH12 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@julianshepherd2038 yes obviously, but burning trees emits carbon. Replanting trees does not fully compensate for the loss of carbon storage that occurs when burning the tress, especially on a repeated schedule. At least that is my understanding

    • @cylemalcolm5434
      @cylemalcolm5434 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Green in the sense it comes from a renewable source. Not green in its waste

  • @mantaray2239
    @mantaray2239 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The vast majority of products do not need quick transport but only regular arrivals. Slow sailing ships are perfect for that. The tiny number products requiring quick delivery could still be shipped using fossil fuels or nuclear power.

    • @cylemalcolm5434
      @cylemalcolm5434 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The ocean is dangerous and it needs to be economically feasible. More time on the ocean is more risk and more hourly wage for smaller deliveries. I don’t think companies would find it worth it

  • @reinerhoffmann3764
    @reinerhoffmann3764 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hallo TED , could you make a video about energy dome and cm blue. Energy dome is a italian firm, that stores electric energy in a closed system by liquifying CO2 gas. CM Blue is a German breakthrough firm, that has develop scaleable batteries with an organic compound instead of lithium.
    Both methods are highly effiecent, rather cheap and build with components that are in use for over 100 years.
    I think, both are a big step foreward in storing electric energy, which makes the weather depending production of windmills and solarpanels a lot more useable.
    Greetings from franconia

  • @Befffy
    @Befffy 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    When did TED become a giant billboard.

    • @MrCharkteeth
      @MrCharkteeth 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Viewership too large to not make it into one?

    • @MrElvis1971
      @MrElvis1971 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's been like this for a long time. There is not even an audience most of the time.

    • @MinotaurDIGITAL
      @MinotaurDIGITAL 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I think it always was. They just used to be better about hiding it.

    • @JustinDeRosa
      @JustinDeRosa 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Marketing worth fact-checking.

  • @classactsexpertiseandinspi4815
    @classactsexpertiseandinspi4815 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    In Ireland the diesel engines in the Tug boats in Dublin harbour have been run for the last year on truly green fuel - treated waste vegetable oil, rather than methane based fuels which carry a higher CO2 risk.

  • @JohnFoley1701
    @JohnFoley1701 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Methanol emits CO2 just like any other fuel.

  • @ikocheratcr
    @ikocheratcr 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I was not aware that methanol can be produced from water and CO2. Watching this video I google for "methianol from electrivcity", and to my surprise is not a new thing. I guess it is about time.

    • @essbing
      @essbing 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It can be made from biomass, natural gas and coal.

  • @interstellarsurfer
    @interstellarsurfer 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Congrats on building your first-of-it's-kind, wood fired steamship. Oh, wait...

  • @essbing
    @essbing 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    So what happens to the old ships? Or are the existing ships retrofitted to accept methanol as a fuel which would be most cost effective and better for the environment.? Why not Methanol? It’s a heck of a lot cheaper than gas. It’s cheaper to make and we don’t have to worry about buying and converting oil to do so. I can think of a million positive reasons to do this. Yes, wind would be the exceptional answer. Let’s just plop a wind turbine on top of all the ships . Oh right, they still need to float. And with the size of the cargo ships these days and the added payload there just won’t be strong enough wind to suffice.

  • @mikesands4681
    @mikesands4681 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    You mean the wind powered cargo ships of the 5th century BCE until 1920s don't count?

  • @PrimRoseLane
    @PrimRoseLane 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sailboats. Checkmate.

    • @011keepers
      @011keepers 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Could sail be used on a super cargo ship seriously I don't know

  • @andycordy5190
    @andycordy5190 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    As a major player in marine transportation, I applaud the attitude at Maersk, however the myth of biofuel as a satisfactory route to de-carbonisation has fooled them into investing in the wrong technology. If every shipping line in the world starts using biofuel, the land use required to grow the materials to produce the fuel is colossal.
    As for the headline. Is nobody aware that until the rise of fossil fuelled steam vessels in the 19th century, there was true green energy powering marine transportation.
    So, without wishing to slap Maersk down, this is greenwashing AND clickbate.
    With an exploding population and a desperate need to reforest the gigantic areas of temperate rainforest destroyed to make way for western civilization, the last thing we need to be doing is ripping out more trees to make land for biofuel production and/or losing productive land that used to grow food.

    • @essbing
      @essbing 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Methanol is also made of other products besides crops

    • @essbing
      @essbing 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And remember they had to use a fuel called coal to feed those steam engines. So really it’s no different. Just a more pure form. Depending what they used to make the biofuel.

    • @philiptaylor7902
      @philiptaylor7902 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@essbinglike what, fossil fuels?

  • @swapanghosh9867
    @swapanghosh9867 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sea turtles spawning?

  • @aniya8759
    @aniya8759 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I think this was already invented thousands of years ago. 😂

  • @marnig9185
    @marnig9185 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A little late?

  • @cranfktubner7677
    @cranfktubner7677 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why “she” for a boat ? 🤔

  • @NOL.Official-KenhTiengAnhSexy
    @NOL.Official-KenhTiengAnhSexy 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    First one to watch

    • @mikesands4681
      @mikesands4681 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Who is the last?

  • @Johnny-dp5mu
    @Johnny-dp5mu 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Renewable electric? Ok explain in scientific terms...

  • @beef1481
    @beef1481 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Green fuel. Uh…I guess it’s “Green” because it burns carbon from a “Renewable” source.

  • @BrianMcInnis87
    @BrianMcInnis87 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That's, uhm...that's not where the ever goes.

  • @ginod2279
    @ginod2279 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So your still burning stuff then. Great success 💩 can't beat a bit of greenwashing

  • @keithdubose2150
    @keithdubose2150 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Geeze .... blocking TED

  • @trader2137
    @trader2137 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    that green fuel propaganda is just making our lives more expensive, green fuel is few times more expensive than diesel, why would you want more expensive transport, thats pure idiocy

  • @invox9490
    @invox9490 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Really TED, I'm on the verge of having to unsubscribe because the amount of back-bending that you're making to big companies and meta-crypto-AI bs is just unfatoble.

  • @NoName-no8ti
    @NoName-no8ti 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    “Green” cargo ships have existed for thousands of years, the Chinese were one of the first to make them.

    • @davidholaday2817
      @davidholaday2817 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah, but not one that can go incredibly fast with a motor.

    • @darinherrick9224
      @darinherrick9224 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@davidholaday2817 things that need to go incredibly fast go by plane.

  • @philiptaylor7902
    @philiptaylor7902 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Classic greenwashing.

  • @meanderinoranges
    @meanderinoranges 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How about we just support businesses that make their products in the USA?

    • @lithepanther
      @lithepanther 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why

    • @meanderinoranges
      @meanderinoranges 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lithepanther um, so there's no need to import Chinese products on cargo ships?

    • @lithepanther
      @lithepanther 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'd rather not own crap thanks@@meanderinoranges

    • @meanderinoranges
      @meanderinoranges 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@lithepanther wow, you're a lovely person. Maybe you should move to a different country.

    • @davidholaday2817
      @davidholaday2817 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Because the USA isn’t the only country in the world, silly.