Simba: so I can use any of these design patterns? Mufasa: yes, anything under the sun in yours to use. Simba: what about that dark place? Mufasa: that's Singleton. Never go there.
Hi All, can someone explain how can an object of type HTMLBuilder be instantiated into an HTMLElement object at 9:45? is it some sort of implicit conversion, because HTMLBuilder only has one HTMLElement private data member..?
Sooo much code on slides that none of us have seen before with annotations... Taking one pattern and typing and compiling the code and testing it properly would've been more useful...
Agree, I found it difficult to follow, can't imagine following it live, without pausing or re-watching some parts. This may be just below my level of expertise, though I think that if scope and pace were reduced, many more people would benefit from it, cause it's great stuff.
Simba: so I can use any of these design patterns?
Mufasa: yes, anything under the sun in yours to use.
Simba: what about that dark place?
Mufasa: that's Singleton. Never go there.
We need more talk like this
Fedor should give more presentations
Fedor is always presenting great stuff, but is really bad in presenting them.
Thanks for sharing.
I don't understand why design patterns so often use inheritance or abstract methods. What ever happened to composition and compile-time polymorphism?
maybe it has something to do with allowing one to deal with circular inclusion/dependency issues ?
I think his try is trivial, because dp are not syntax , they r Semantic and concept
Hi All, can someone explain how can an object of type HTMLBuilder be instantiated into an HTMLElement object at 9:45? is it some sort of implicit conversion, because HTMLBuilder only has one HTMLElement private data member..?
At 9:50 in the HTMLBuilder class there is a conversion operator to HTMLElement
Very interesting talk, but kind of rough :)
Builder, visitor and error handling pattern
Can someone explain what the issue with initializer_list is in th-cam.com/video/MdtYi0vvct0/w-d-xo.html ?
Sooo much code on slides that none of us have seen before with annotations...
Taking one pattern and typing and compiling the code and testing it properly would've been more useful...
Agree, I found it difficult to follow, can't imagine following it live, without pausing or re-watching some parts. This may be just below my level of expertise, though I think that if scope and pace were reduced, many more people would benefit from it, cause it's great stuff.