If they are safe why, in 1986 did the US pHARMafia put into "law" that no one can sue the manufacturers of these doom clot shots? I truly hope that all that are AWARE of the TRUTH and still pushing this, will suffer
Because of the litigation nonsense present in the USA. The land where you sue everyone and everything based on a nonsense. They were and are still accountable to the licences in which they were released. If you aren't from the industry then you do not understand it...stop being told what is fact when it is indeed nonsense.
@@DrunkDelilahBrewery - "Because of the litigation nonsense present in the USA" That 'litigation' nonsense that you mention is responsible for bringing Corporate Criminals to justice over silly little things like Glyphosate, Trichloroethylene, BPS, Agent Orange, Asbestos, etc.... " If you aren't from the industry then you do not understand it..." I'm not from the Climate or Weather Industry, but I do know Science and PV=nRT is a law that debunks CO2 AGW, yet Scientists being paid by Politicians will tell you that CO2 AGW is a Scientific Fact, despite the proven Ideal Gas Law saying CO2 AGW is impossible.
Exactly. I got a Swine Flu vaccine in My 20's when working at a hospital in the Midwest and I got MS from the damn thing. They KNEW the side effects of it too. They were told to keep their mouths shut for 8 yrs about it or They'd lose their licenses. After the period was over is when I got told by my neurologist. Another Neurologist wrote a book and one of the chapters in it was on the Swine flu vaccine and how many it killed and the side effects. My Uncle got Myasthenia Gravis from it!
@@AQUARIASGOLDENAGE In Ireland, millions of euro have been paid out to people injured by that one! It caused a lot of neurological issues. I'm very sorry you've been injured too 😔
I think you’ll find not a penny. You see, there’s science which is fact and not opinion. Then there’s conspiracy theories which are the kind of opinions that are shared by primary school children until they know better
What do myocarditis, ischemic strokes & type 1 diabetes all have in common? They’re all now being more closely researched for possible links to either COVID-19 AND/OR the COVID-19 vaccines. In a period of 6-18 months following vaccination, my mother had an ischemic stroke, my father had myocarditis & my 16 year old daughter was diagnosed with type 1 diabetes. NONE of them ever tested positive for COVID-19. My parents barely left their house during the pandemic. You can test & research for a thousand years, but make no mistake about it, until a vaccine or medication is in widespread circulation, it is dangerous & unethical to claim that it is safe for the masses. We still don’t know all of the long term implications of contracting the virus, let alone any possible side effects of the vaccines created.
And yet, billions have taken it. My entire family of 50+ members have taken 4 total shots. Zero side effects. If what you say is true, we wouldn't hear the end of it. In the digital age, a conspiracy of this magnitude would be virtually impossible to conceal.
Increases in myocarditis has been mentioned in the media numerous times since the pandemic. My daughter’s epidemiologist told us in the hospital that there had been a sudden increase in T1D since the pandemic, I would have to find the research article regarding ischemic stroke correlations. Notice…I never once said in my original comment that the vaccine or the virus caused these occurrences in my family. I said it’s been mentioned in research. If you’re truly interested, you do the research. I had the vaccine as well with zero side effects. The large majority of people I know who had the vaccine had no side effects. That does not by default mean that there are zero side effects in all human beings. We are all different & our bodies react to things differently.
I am also insinuating that these conditions that have affected my family may have been caused by the virus itself even though they never had symptoms or tested positive. Again, it’s incredibly arrogant & bordering on ignorant to hands down, unequivocally claim that vaccines cannot cause issues for anyone ever which is definitely how this woman in the video comes across.
@Notorious 42067 Yes you are guessing. Because there is no way for you to know whether I did or not. Do you want to be pedantic or are you going to admit you don't know what you're talking about with your conspiracy?
@Red Herring Great, Instead of asking moronic questions that attempt to ridicule me, why don't you focus on the topic and answer the question if you are that confident? Oh wait, you can't. If you could, you would have done it already.
lolololololololol They wouldn’t need to try so hard if people who’s ultímate potential has led them to commenting on YT videos didn’t work so hard to discredit highly accomplished people to people with low intelligence.
Coming from a third world country, this comment section feels like people in first world countries don't have any real problems, so they create their own.
I'm looking for the ones that positively destroy this propaganda. These pathetic mainstream lies don't have a chance out in the open, not without censoring the real science and doctors that bring up inconvenient facts and questions.
@@TimmmmmyD Cope and seethe cuz that's how long term studies work, infact hundreds of long term studies are happening for things in food you ate today, many of them might turn out to be dangerous but we'll only find out after a while, from the data you(or your death) provide. Things are added and subtracted with research. Believe it or not, if you ever existed, you're a statistic somewhere.
Its a know fact that when government rushes anything their is something probably overlooked!!!!UTHINK Maybe screwed up !!! Question 1: Why are millions of uexplained deaths? Question 2: Why are their millions of unexplained life insurance payoffs ?? Question 3: Why are their billions of dollars illegally collected by hospitals ???
I understand that the problem with Thalidomide came about because the manufacturing process with some batches subtly altered the drug so that it was not actually identical to the drug that was thoroughly tested. There was also a manufacruring problem with an early Polio vaccine.
There are always problems with many many drugs and vaccines. All the time And provaxers always try to sweep the evidences under the rug. While they keep on pushing and agressively forcing people innocent people to take part in their dangerous human experiments. But this is the 21st century, things that was considered bad in the 20th century are now acceptable. Back then peole were fighting for their freedom and rights, today those provaxers who abuse human rights are the good nazis. I mean the good guys.
@@Power_to_the_people567 we get it bro you took the vaccine and now have clots in your veins and your balls dont work. stop telling everyone else to take it.
How can you be so sure? How do you know that you didn't contact it from catching the virus before you got the vaccine? (Oh wait, i know, because it doesn't fit your narrative).
@@lizliz4186 i was tested prior to being vaccinated . Common practice in my country , ostensibly to prevent untoward intensification of potential vaccine side effects in a patient with current infection and also intensification of pre existent covid infection. My qualified MD provided the diagnosis of pericarditis and its origin. I come from a family of medics, some of whom say the research was rushed. My sister is a pathologist and she is critical of the vaccines and the way the research was expedited in a way which cut corners. I have no narrative, having myself a scientific and rationalistic , materialistic worldview. I have been vaccinated and provided no resistance to vaccination or mask wearing. I am not Christian or American and am not a conspiracy theorist. Have you perchance read any peer reviewed articles in reputable medical journals about the pericarditis and vaccine connection, in young men? It is well established in reputable medical literature.
The application of "science" suggests a thorough & exhaustive investigation, with candid rigorous peer review, and a transparent presentation of all information. How is this even close to that?
@@andycordy5190 I not only saw those details, but I've also spent a lot of time investigating this event, the response to it, & where things are today. I do sense that we have very different beliefs about those recorded deaths, and all that has transpired which has brought about the division we have in many societies today. Just a brief read-through of this comments section will show those who accept the details provided by the establishment, & those like myself who either know or feel very strongly that there is much more to this. Regardless, I respect your beliefs & feelings toward this sensitive event. Be well.
@Milk Thistle You presume way too much. I am cynical of political leadership and skeptical of science. The pathway to vaccination was opened by university researchers whose primary focus is to combat a deadly virus. How all of that turned into a conspiracy theory, I have no idea and no interest but I side with the people who are trying to protect public heath in millions of citizen. If you're suggesting TED is part of the "corruption and tyranny" when its remit is to promote innovative research then you are missing the point of this talk altogether. My point is, that if someone has shut down on vaccination because of mis-information they have accepted without statistical evidence or examining the facts, will never accept vaccination because they believe in something else.
because this science was the most thorough global partnership to develop a vaccine in history, becasue more scientists than ever were involved in peer review, and the studies are all redily available online, presented transparently. Can I ask what your experience in scientific method is?
It is not a cure. Please understand this fact. It is designed to build anti-bodies to the target protein spike that is present in the virus which causes the infection to take hold. The vaccine introduces the spike protein (not the virus) into the body as to trigger a natural immune response. Then when the virus comes along and tries to attach to your bodies immune system, T Cells already exist to fight off the protein before the virus can take hold. Think of it as a condom approach instead of a vasectomy !!!
You should have listened: vaccines DO NOT protect from getting Covid but it lowers the severity especially for older people. New study also suggesta a 15% lower chance of developing Long Covid, a condition uncurable as of today.
If you are going through rt-pcr test which is invented by kary mullis they only said that rt-pcr not made for test corona virus or any other virus they state that they make it for there own research. Basically rt-pcr is showing fals positive and negetive report!!
Vaccines save 2Million lives+ a year, NO studies have shown vaccines to be linked to any significant mortality. And ALL medication, literally all of it, has negative side effects in a small percentage of it's users. The testing simply makes sure these negative reactions are in a small enough minority for it to be relatively safe. For Covid they did rush it a little but the lives saved from it being available sooner out-weighed the risk of lesser testing. And to people who feel like they have a very low chance of having issues from covid or long-covid then fair enough, avoid the vaccine (younger people get long covid easier due to overactive immune systems, older people die from covid more, there's a sweetspot in the middle where you're at low risk to both).
@@dissarray6906 Yes the vaccines, which this video is about, are medications in the sense that you always have to look at the gains and risks to see if it makes sense to take them. And maybe you just dont know this but every medication CAN CAUSE unwanted effects and therefore brings risk. And since the american law system is very bad companies have to protect themself against that.
This is science. But when you have politics and money along with some psychology involved, it is completely a different story. I am a biomedical scientist, by the way.
How safe is safe? There's always a risk, it's about managing risks. That's why the certain vaccines are not recommended for certain groups of people. This video is a gross oversimplification and more of a "just take our word, move along nothing to see here" take.
For all the people who want to unsubscribe I want to say in this dark moment we are all living we need to stay strong and vigilant. New people who come here may find useful why we disagree with this propaganda. Sloth does not belong to us neither now nor never!
@@Power_to_the_people567 well there's also that problem that a blanket statement that vaccinations are safe is a lie. Most are. Not all. Given recent results, I would say that stating categorically that they are safe is anti-scientific at a minimum. Let's take the MRNA vaccine for instance. It's intended to be injected intramuscularly. That is because the MRNA packets instruct cells to make and express viral proteins. Those cells are in turn identified by T cells as potentially infected and are instructed to apoptos or lyze. That is the source of the significant inflammation and pain that you feel with this particular type of vaccine. Now think for a second. The MRNA vaccine causes your own cells to express viral proteins, and then those cells are in turn damaged or destroyed in the process of recognizing those viral proteins and ultimately producing antibody against them. That's fine if it's a few muscle cells in your shoulder. What happens if that vaccine is accidentally applied IV? Now you're talking about infecting endothelial cells of your blood vessels. And where do veins carry things rather quickly? To your heart and lungs. Suddenly all these documented issues with lung inflammation and cardiac myocyte damage make a lot more sense. Instead of harmlessly losing a few muscle cells, now you're causing crucial cells in your heart and lungs to express viral proteins, and those cells are in turn targeted by your own immune system. Now none of this is controversial, it's not even debated at this point. You have only to look on PubMed to find exactly what I'm talking about. And to claim that these vaccines are categorically safe is nothing short of a lie. No understand me. I'm very much Pro vaccination. I have every vaccination that I have been permitted to get. I do not have smallpox, or hpv, although I would like both of those. Giving my prior career I've been vaccinated against a lot of things that are rare in the United States but more common in Africa. Calling me anti-vax only reveals your own bias and ignorance. And claiming that vaccines, categorically, are safe, likewise reveals your bias and or ignorance and or fundamental dishonesty. If you're going to claim to be Pro science, you have to be honest about the science. And you are not.
@The Barking Mouse You are assuming I said all vaccines are safe. I haven't made that claim. So all of your comment boils down to you arguing a strawman against me and you follow it by an attempt to ridicule when you asume you know anything about me.
@@Power_to_the_people567 that's what the video is saying. And that is blatantly incorrect. And it takes very little effort to get on PubMed and understand why. I like TED talks for the most part, but for some reason they are giving into this propaganda. It's better to be honest with people. If given incorrectly x vaccine can be dangerous. If a person is sensitive and suffers allergies, they can be dangerous. A live, or attenuated viral vaccine given to a person who is immune compromised can be very dangerous. It's simplistic presentations like this and what is supposed to be a forum for informed people is inexcusable. I can understand saying this to a third grader, but not an adult audience. And lies like that or what cause people to have legitimate concern. I got the moderna vaccine and booster, despite my understanding of how mRNA vaccines work, because at the time we did not know yet how dangerous covid was and I have elderly parents so I was willing to take the risk to protect them. Now that I know that vaccine neither prevents you from getting the disease, nor does it prevent you from spreading the disease, but it only reduces your own symptoms. I would have not gotten the vaccine knowing that. It's not worth the risk to my lungs and heart. And ultimately both my parents and myself got covid despite being vaccinated. I've had it twice more since then. In that case, the danger of the vaccine far outweighs the benefit to me. TED Talks are supposed to be for reasonably intelligent and sophisticated people. And this kind of propagandistic simplistic inaccurate presentation is an insult.
@The Barking Mouse So what exactly in this video was a lie and can you post the paper in PubMed that supports your claim? Your anecdote is irrelevant to the conversation. But if you want to go based on that. Then you have just agreed and admitted that the vaccine reduces the symptoms. Now compare symptoms between the number of non-vaccinated VS the vaccinated. The numbers don't lie, the vaccine reduced the mortality f the virus. The common cold, polio, etc... killed many people, now look at how many can survive it due to medicine and vaccines. And look at how many have died when they didn't get vaccinations or proper medicine. I appreciate your skepticism, but including biases, anecdotes, and anti-establishment arguments does not reflect proper skepticism but rather, blind distrust.
All legal medicines and treatments being used could be called "Safe". But you shouldn't take them unless you need them. Many if not most people do not need to take a Covid 19 vaccine. We do not know about the long term effects and unforeseen consequences of such blanket vaccination.
Under what basis do you say that most people do not need to take the covid 19 vaccine? Based on what evidence? What studies have you performed that agree with that conclusion?
@@Power_to_the_people567 Most people, especially under 50's and children, have healthy immune systems and can easily deal with a Covid infection. Covid only poses a serious risk to specifically vulnerable and elderly people. As most people are not in that specifically vulnerable or elderly category then most people do not need to take it.
This guy with his objectively hilarious username "Objective Morality" does not concern themselves with things such as brain or organ damage. Over the many years of suckling on lead pipes, ingesting industrial waste, being gassed by trucks and who knows what else, they have calloused their brain with repetitive damage and strain. There is no more risk for this one to be hurt by anything, for this vegetable is already boiled.
If Vaccines are safe...then why can I not hold the Pharmaceutical company liable if something bad happens? If they are so safe, where is my garantee that they are safe and why cant I choose my own vaccine schedule?
@@Power_to_the_people567 The appeal to authority fallacy is the logical fallacy that Florian is referencing. "The Science" being the authority that Make Racists Afraid Again is appealing to. The same "Science" that said that the Covid Vaccine is safe and effective when later we learned that it is not safe after many vaccinated have contracted myocarditis among other things and that it's not effective in preventing the spread nor contraction of Covid. Furthermore, you should understand that "Scientific" studies are paid for by someone and that someone is paying for a desired outcome in a lot more cases than you might realize.
@Growing Against the Grain Nice way of misrepresenting what science is. What do we call that.... ah yeah, we call it a strawman fallacy. Science is not an entity. It is a process. And scientific studies undergo a peer review process that eliminates any bias or conflicts of interests. You are both strawmaning science, and appealing to fallacies that do not apply at all. You are also making generalizations and assumptions on your statement. "Myocarditis is rare, but when it occurs, it is most commonly caused by an infection in the body. Infections from viruses (most common, including those that cause the common cold, influenza or COVID-19), bacteria, fungus or parasites can lead to myocardial inflammation." You are assuming the vaccine caused myocarditis when in fact the cause is the covid 19 virus
Hmm considering that the vaccine at the base of the current lawsuit against the US military has not been approved by the FDA this video may or may not be valid.
Pro - vaccine ads should not be spread on a platform like TH-cam. Such ads should belong to the vaccine manufacturer and should belong on platforms such vaccine manufacturers manage.
This video is all well and good if followed.... IMO The latest round of V's were NOT tested as thoroughly as previous V's such as Polio and Rubella V's....
@@kbarrett63 Youre tripping dude. the potential use of mRNA, the techniques used and the development of vaccines in general has been in medical science publications for over 30 years now. maybe instead of "informing" yourself you should actualy take time and try to understand how medical science works. That would also have the benefit that you wouldnt embarrass yourself further.
@@Sir-Complains-a-Lot why do you have to personally attack the person asking a simple question? is it because you are insecure and can't actually back up what you say? I think so.
@@neiltroppmann7773 This is hilarious, cause the science behind the vaccines is very clear, but you just ignore that again and again to ask some stupid question that just shows how little time you actualy took to research the topic. And yes i attack you personaly because you seem to think your ignorance is a blessing.
@Joe ...and yet peer reviewed NIH published literature upholds the toxicity proof of mRNA in hydrogel delivery systems on biological cells. There are many experiments dating back to 10, 15 years. All published and peer reviewed on the NIH website. As a research scientist who specialty was stem cell science I urge you to do your own investigation perhaps into the "safety and efficacy" retoric.
@@dakotayounger6988 I only comment to gain further insight - a conflict is not of interest. I stumbled across Chang Yang Gong et. al. 2009 (Acute toxicity evaluation of biodegradable in situ gel-forming controlled drug delivery system based on thermosensitive PEG-PCL-PEG hydrogel). Interestingly, they found that PEG-PCL-PEG hydrogel was nontoxic and could be a safe candidate for in situ drug delivery systems, despite having used relatively high concentrations. In the study by Xingyi Li et. al. 2012 (Cytotoxicity and biocompatibility evaluation of N,O-carboxymethyl chitosan/oxidized alginate hydrogel for drug delivery application) they found no obvious cytotoxic properties either for that specific hydrogel. However, note that mRNA wasn't present in the hydrogel polymers in either study. The relatively recent study by Heidrun Steinle et. al. 2018 (Incorporation of Synthetic mRNA in Injectable Chitosan-Alginate Hybrid Hydrogels for Local and Sustained Expression of Exogenous Proteins in Cells) did however incorporate mRNA into hydrogel, and further incorporated cells into the hydrogel containing mRNA. They concluded, and I quote: "hydrogels are promising delivery systems for sustained delivery of synthetic mRNAs into cells." So I'm not certain which type of hydrogel polymer you refer to, or which study specifically when it comes to the toxicity of hydrogel delivery systems on biological cells. So please enlighten me with your personal findings. As I initially stated, I would love to gain further insight - if only to obtain more knowledge on the subject matter. I'm looking forward to hear from you and what your research has yielded.
@@remyllebeau77 hmmm this deep analogy. Clearly the same as the ability to read scientific litterature ... You are a proof of Duning Kruger Effect tho
@@thelastpillar4973 actual medical studies (Singer et. al, 2022, Bozkurt et. al, 2021, Patone et. al, 2021, among many others) did. Care to provide your own counter-evidence? Oh sure, just delete your message now. How sad.
The other day, that same woman pretended that all the sleep problems explained in various "life coaches" videos were false. I was surprised because they always put the sources of their statements and they're really serious. Now this same woman starts with "the covid vaccine is perfectly safe". Bye bye ted talks, has been going knowing you.
If it is safe for most, then the right thing to do is to save the majority. If we lived by only looking at rare cases then we wouldn't have any medicine, no surgery, etc...
Usually, animal models translate nicely to humans. With vaccines, I have no confidence, because in the animals, they never look into toxicity much, and then when they do the human trials, they make sure that toxicity is low by diluting the vaccine, but never properly test for efficacy. You can just tell the story, that there's some real stuff in there, but it's so little it won't hurt you (or the virus). I mean during polio or was it the first asian flu pandemic, they literally ran out of material so they just diluted it, knowing nobody would be the wiser.
Just remember how hysterical provaxers are. How hard they tried to oppress people. They send their police forces to oppress people who were simply demonstrating for their mere freedom rights. How hysterical they were, they nearly exploded just trying to discriminate unvaccinated people and trying to make covid vaccines mandatory. Hilarious little idiots those are, arent they? :D
“Safe for fertility” what does that even mean? Safe is a subjective term. I don’t care about your subjective opinions, I’m an engineer, just show me the numbers so I can decide.
TED should really get to talking about the autism genocide clock. Anything involving the triple tap vaccine causing autism directly caused a eugenics movement in the US, combined with Autism stereotyping, and the reinforced the motives behind Judge Rotenberg’s Center for Education (electroshock to autistic kids, 5 killed, since the 1970’s.) One should note the intersectionality of this, because electroshock treatments were also used against the LGBT population. Disabled people deserve to have their history talked about, and I won’t stand for people not wanting to talk about it. Period.
Autism is genetic. Vaccines don't cause it. If you really cared about autistic you would understand their history. Nothing wrong being autistic either.
It may be safe..but is it tested for effectiveness by having the study done against a placebo control group? Because how do we know that its the vaccine working instead of the bodys natural strength of fighting the virus?
What testing of these preparations? Normally, tests are carried out before being put into use, which last a minimum of 4-10 years. No objective clinical studies have been conducted on the preparations. Someone here is lying.
This explanation of how vaccines are developed is an incredibly meaningful. I appreciate how Dr. Gunter detailed the process and recent intervention to efficaciously streamline steps in order to provide a safe, effective vaccine during an ongoing pandemic. Unfortunately, vaccine science and technology became heavily politicized during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic with misinformation running rampant. With the pre-existing anti-vaccination movement and beliefs founded on the indisputably false claim that vaccines cause autism in children, originally stemming from critically flawed and now debunked studies by Andrew Wakefield, vaccine science and efficacy was further subjected to baseless criticism. Dr. Gunter addresses an issue with ethical implications on the individual, societal, and public health levels. As the science and healthcare community continue to establish trust with the public regarding vaccines, we as human beings and a collective society must consider our moral obligation to be vaccinated to prevent disease and death. It was the utilitarian philosopher Peter Singer who “remarked that if it is our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance, we ought, morally, to do it.” Harm prevention is a powerful argument for vaccination, and while vaccination can be mandated by government, the less controversial and more humanistic view of vaccination as a moral imperative to prevent harm to the individual, all others, and benefit the public aligns with the ethical principle of beneficence, or simply put doing good. Furthermore, Alberto Giubilini summarizes in his article published in the British Medical Bulletin that “considerations of harm prevention prevail over considerations of individual liberty.” The notion of protecting our most vulnerable individuals, especially children who have the right to be protected from preventable harm, is particularly essential to our moral obligation to receive safe, effective vaccinations. Moreover, parents must be properly informed and educated in the preventative medical care of their own children for their health and the greater good of both the public and the next generation of humans. Ultimately, vaccination and its ethical implications epitomize the connection between individual, collective, and institutional responsibility. I hope that we as a society and human beings can foster education, decisions, and policies that will support, enhance, and facilitate vaccination for the benefit of us all.
This video will persuade no one. To persuade the other side you have to address their actual criticisms instead of gaslighting, empathize with their viewpoint, and admit imperfection / risks.
The smart enough people already know how everything works, and the ignorant never will because they don't even want to. There's no gaslighting here, only dumb people that don't understand enough and misinterpret science, favouring their own ignorance and prejudices instead.
@@Sir-Complains-a-Lot in both situation, an individual case isn't a scientific proof.... It needs peer reviewing, replication, Meta analysis, etc. Too much scepticism leads to none at all...
Doesn't really matter how much expertise or data you have - because people have OPINIONS and they've HEARD SOMEONE SAY SOMETHING and therefor you must be wrong, Dr. This video isn't extremely well made, but people suck either way.
@@remyllebeau77 of course they are but the amount of resistance to a science that is almost as old as science itself is starting to become insane plus the comment seem to have no idea what the purpose is anyway people seem to think of it as a cure when it's in fact prevention
@@remyllebeau77 The literal existence of peer review is what helps contain corruption. The person in this video has literally nothing to gain. Literally all the so called doctors speaking out against the vaccines had monetary gain/free public exposure.
@@remyllebeau77 First of all, anyone can publish a paper. This is called pre-print. Actual peer reviewed papers and studies are a whole different ballpark.
I went to the description box to look for links to reliable articles so I can deepen my knowledge yet such things don't exist. I'm supposed to believe her because she has 'Dr.' in front of her name?
Google Scholar is your friend. Science isn't about beliefs it is about evidence (opinion, personal experience or isolated incident isn't scientific evidence) , this video is just popularization
More than that, it is evil. These leftists are doing everything they can to bring the WEF globalist nightmare future into a reality near you. Never forget their crimes against humanity!
Oh a Dr says its safe thats alright then. Not like that Dr is stuck in their own echo chamber being told to push certain drugs to patients. Its not like Drs ever told pregnant "Women" that smoking was good for their health and the babies.
"Researchers already had years of knowledge and insight to work from. Scientists already knew a lot about other coronaviruses. And because of knowledge sharing they were able to simply download the virus;s genetic code off a website. They were also able to take advantage of the advances made in mRNA vaccine technology" The Fancy way of saying they skipped clinical testing. I love how she makes this sound like a "safe" thing...lol
@@Power_to_the_people567 which is a problem because they were. Majority of Animal testing was skipped, phase 1 trails were reduced in time and phases 3 and 2 were merged. With no real safety testing done at all, they simply tested for efficacy(efficacy defined as anti bodies get produced), you cannot safety test in that time frame. The placebo group was destroyed half way through the merged trail and offered the vaccine. Actual risk reduction of the vaccines was shown to be less then 1%, but the pharmaceutical companies promoted them as 90% effective based on relative risk reduction.
@@lw1zfog I was not scripted into childish correct misinfo at college. I fled study physics early 70th cos of mental pollution at that university , that long already leftists fanatism spreading stupidities
![30 ชั่วโมงคนเดียว บนรถไฟชั้น 3 โซเวียต [Around The World Ep. 2]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/MlE9boAVqDA/mqdefault.jpg)
If they are safe, then why did the government strengthen the anti indemnity laws specifically for these vaccines? Thoughts?
If they are safe why, in 1986 did the US pHARMafia put into "law" that no one can sue the manufacturers of these doom clot shots?
I truly hope that all that are AWARE of the TRUTH and still pushing this, will suffer
Because of the litigation nonsense present in the USA. The land where you sue everyone and everything based on a nonsense. They were and are still accountable to the licences in which they were released. If you aren't from the industry then you do not understand it...stop being told what is fact when it is indeed nonsense.
@@DrunkDelilahBrewery - "Because of the litigation nonsense present in the USA"
That 'litigation' nonsense that you mention is responsible for bringing Corporate Criminals to justice over silly little things like Glyphosate, Trichloroethylene, BPS, Agent Orange, Asbestos, etc....
" If you aren't from the industry then you do not understand it..."
I'm not from the Climate or Weather Industry, but I do know Science and PV=nRT is a law that debunks CO2 AGW, yet Scientists being paid by Politicians will tell you that CO2 AGW is a Scientific Fact, despite the proven Ideal Gas Law saying CO2 AGW is impossible.
Because we live in a very litigious country and it would make lawyers very wealthy over nothing.
It's the US. Other countries didn't and they have way more strict vaccine laws. The pandemic isn't always about the US.
How much did those pharmaceutical companies pay her to say that on TED?
Exactly. I got a Swine Flu vaccine in My 20's when working at a hospital in the Midwest and I got MS from the damn thing. They KNEW the side effects of it too. They were told to keep their mouths shut for 8 yrs about it or They'd lose their licenses. After the period was over is when I got told by my neurologist. Another Neurologist wrote a book and one of the chapters in it was on the Swine flu vaccine and how many it killed and the side effects. My Uncle got Myasthenia Gravis from it!
@@AQUARIASGOLDENAGE In Ireland, millions of euro have been paid out to people injured by that one! It caused a lot of neurological issues. I'm very sorry you've been injured too 😔
I think you’ll find not a penny. You see, there’s science which is fact and not opinion. Then there’s conspiracy theories which are the kind of opinions that are shared by primary school children until they know better
@@LiveDonkeyDeadLion and then there's EXPERIENCE which is way better than Science!
Just keep following Qanon. Natural selection will weed lunatics like yourself out....
"Died suddenly"
4.5 million views in just 2 days!
@@katharina...
Stew Peters is a God send.
Only on Rumble it is nearly 5 million in less than 2 days..
Shalom from Israel~pfizerland
On Rumble now! The timing of this Pfizer ad is suspicious,
Fake news. Nobody dies suddenly. They just don't want you to keep us safe!
It's better to die suddenly than have a prolonged death
Now TED is the PR department for big pharma, love it
It has been all along. Nothing new
“Pregnant people “ undermines your credibility right away
What do myocarditis, ischemic strokes & type 1 diabetes all have in common? They’re all now being more closely researched for possible links to either COVID-19 AND/OR the COVID-19 vaccines. In a period of 6-18 months following vaccination, my mother had an ischemic stroke, my father had myocarditis & my 16 year old daughter was diagnosed with type 1 diabetes. NONE of them ever tested positive for COVID-19. My parents barely left their house during the pandemic. You can test & research for a thousand years, but make no mistake about it, until a vaccine or medication is in widespread circulation, it is dangerous & unethical to claim that it is safe for the masses. We still don’t know all of the long term implications of contracting the virus, let alone any possible side effects of the vaccines created.
source(s)?
Exactly DownRange02
And yet, billions have taken it. My entire family of 50+ members have taken 4 total shots. Zero side effects. If what you say is true, we wouldn't hear the end of it. In the digital age, a conspiracy of this magnitude would be virtually impossible to conceal.
Increases in myocarditis has been mentioned in the media numerous times since the pandemic. My daughter’s epidemiologist told us in the hospital that there had been a sudden increase in T1D since the pandemic, I would have to find the research article regarding ischemic stroke correlations. Notice…I never once said in my original comment that the vaccine or the virus caused these occurrences in my family. I said it’s been mentioned in research. If you’re truly interested, you do the research. I had the vaccine as well with zero side effects. The large majority of people I know who had the vaccine had no side effects. That does not by default mean that there are zero side effects in all human beings. We are all different & our bodies react to things differently.
I am also insinuating that these conditions that have affected my family may have been caused by the virus itself even though they never had symptoms or tested positive. Again, it’s incredibly arrogant & bordering on ignorant to hands down, unequivocally claim that vaccines cannot cause issues for anyone ever which is definitely how this woman in the video comes across.
Why are you promoting the investigational injections ? You will need to be arrested as well.
You don't understand trials then do you.
Amen Julie
You didn't watch the video. Literally the video explained how and when the trials were performed.
"Brought to you by Moderna, Pfizer & Biontech"
Congratulations Dr Jen Gunter, 1000McShillings have been deposited to your account
pHARMafia in(censored)deed
Thank you TED for keeping comments open. 😊
I think you will find that they did not listen to these people. They just banned them
I wonder how many dislikes they have.
Shame TH-cam hid the dislikes bar... For this exact reason!!
@@mattyboydabest97 truth.
It's about 58% L 42% D. You can get an extension to return the function.
@@bradleysdavis8400 an extension where?
I’m guessing she got a nice bonus for this Talk by pharma or the government. Or both.
@@makeracistsafraidagain Childish profile pic;)
Guessing doesn't equal that you know anything about it.
@@Power_to_the_people567 This message has been brought to you by Pfizer...
@@Power_to_the_people567 I'm guessing you liked your own comment? Am I guessing right?
@Notorious 42067 Yes you are guessing. Because there is no way for you to know whether I did or not.
Do you want to be pedantic or are you going to admit you don't know what you're talking about with your conspiracy?
Tell that to otherwise healthy 35 year olds who collapse for seemingly no reason
Great story bro? source?
Sorry im not allowed to talk about this since we're on thid tyrannical platform
@@Sir-Complains-a-Lot Great propaganda comment, propaganda spam bot!
@@Sir-Complains-a-Lothope you survived long enough to get your latest booster
safe and effective... anyway I don't trust you
That's fine
I remember when Ted talks were good and not propaganda
Can you refute any claim in this video?
@Red Herring Great, Instead of asking moronic questions that attempt to ridicule me, why don't you focus on the topic and answer the question if you are that confident?
Oh wait, you can't. If you could, you would have done it already.
@@Power_to_the_people567 You have courage. All these youtube experts...
If they're safe they wouldn't have to try so hard to convince everyone
If people weren't so dumb they wouldn't have to try so hard to convince everyone.
Because no one politicized the vaccine to begin with, right? Twice as many Republicans have died from Covid than Democrats, I wonder why?
I wonder how much she made for this
I would assume it's because the vaccine came quickly and became politicized, so there was already doubt about it being safe
lolololololololol
They wouldn’t need to try so hard if people who’s ultímate potential has led them to commenting on YT videos didn’t work so hard to discredit highly accomplished people to people with low intelligence.
Who else is searching for the positive comments? 😂
Lol
Coming from a third world country, this comment section feels like people in first world countries don't have any real problems, so they create their own.
I'm looking for the ones that positively destroy this propaganda. These pathetic mainstream lies don't have a chance out in the open, not without censoring the real science and doctors that bring up inconvenient facts and questions.
Me ;__;
@@Pope_Balenciaga Couldn't have put it better myself
The comments are restoring my faith in humanity!
I'm with you. Unfortunately many of the humanity restoring comments have just been scrubbed/removed
I know right
No long term data though.
The people that took the jab are the long term data providers. Sucks to be them 😅
@@TimmmmmyD Cope and seethe cuz that's how long term studies work, infact hundreds of long term studies are happening for things in food you ate today, many of them might turn out to be dangerous but we'll only find out after a while, from the data you(or your death) provide. Things are added and subtracted with research.
Believe it or not, if you ever existed, you're a statistic somewhere.
@@sai_69 that's ... not a good thing😐 we didn't give these dr frankenmengeles permission to experiment on us😒
@@bethsheba7 Oh, they aren't forcing you to eat stuff or interact with reality at all. It's all your choice, stop existing if that bothers you.
Its a know fact that when government rushes anything their is something probably overlooked!!!!UTHINK Maybe screwed up !!! Question 1: Why are millions of uexplained deaths? Question 2: Why are their millions of unexplained life insurance payoffs ?? Question 3: Why are their billions of dollars illegally collected by hospitals ???
What you are rhetorically asking, in relation to covid, has been debunked so many times that is getting boring to reply.
I understand that the problem with Thalidomide came about because the manufacturing process with some batches subtly altered the drug so that it was not actually identical to the drug that was thoroughly tested. There was also a manufacruring problem with an early Polio vaccine.
polio vax was never made proprietary
There are always problems with many many drugs and vaccines.
All the time
And provaxers always try to sweep the evidences under the rug.
While they keep on pushing and agressively forcing people innocent people to take part in their dangerous human experiments.
But this is the 21st century, things that was considered bad in the 20th century are now acceptable.
Back then peole were fighting for their freedom and rights, today those provaxers who abuse human rights are the good nazis. I mean the good guys.
Too much money was paid to have mistakes/problems with manufacturing.
THE DATA IS CLEAR WE TESTED 8 MICE.
...and 4 billions humans.
@@En_theo When did a randomized controlled-trial of 4 billion people take place?
You are making that up.
@@Power_to_the_people567 we get it bro you took the vaccine and now have clots in your veins and your balls dont work. stop telling everyone else to take it.
@@bennyboy776 he means when they sent it out to the population
Really condescending tone ….. like most medics. I contracted myocarditis post vaccination.
My doctor's wife also
How can you be so sure? How do you know that you didn't contact it from catching the virus before you got the vaccine? (Oh wait, i know, because it doesn't fit your narrative).
Feel well B"H (God Willing)
@@lizliz4186 i was tested prior to being vaccinated . Common practice in my country , ostensibly to prevent untoward intensification of potential vaccine side effects in a patient with current infection and also intensification of pre existent covid infection. My qualified MD provided the diagnosis of pericarditis and its origin. I come from a family of medics, some of whom say the research was rushed. My sister is a pathologist and she is critical of the vaccines and the way the research was expedited in a way which cut corners. I have no narrative, having myself a scientific and rationalistic , materialistic worldview. I have been vaccinated and provided no resistance to vaccination or mask wearing. I am not Christian or American and am not a conspiracy theorist. Have you perchance read any peer reviewed articles in reputable medical journals about the pericarditis and vaccine connection, in young men? It is well established in reputable medical literature.
I'm so sorry
The application of "science" suggests a thorough & exhaustive investigation, with candid rigorous peer review, and a transparent presentation of all information. How is this even close to that?
Maybe you didn't see the deaths, the speed at which the virus was spreading and the helplessness of IC professionals?
@@andycordy5190 I not only saw those details, but I've also spent a lot of time investigating this event, the response to it, & where things are today.
I do sense that we have very different beliefs about those recorded deaths, and all that has transpired which has brought about the division we have in many societies today.
Just a brief read-through of this comments section will show those who accept the details provided by the establishment, & those like myself who either know or feel very strongly that there is much more to this.
Regardless, I respect your beliefs & feelings toward this sensitive event.
Be well.
@@andycordy5190 I saw nurses with balloons in their pants 😐
@Milk Thistle You presume way too much. I am cynical of political leadership and skeptical of science. The pathway to vaccination was opened by university researchers whose primary focus is to combat a deadly virus. How all of that turned into a conspiracy theory, I have no idea and no interest but I side with the people who are trying to protect public heath in millions of citizen. If you're suggesting TED is part of the "corruption and tyranny" when its remit is to promote innovative research then you are missing the point of this talk altogether. My point is, that if someone has shut down on vaccination because of mis-information they have accepted without statistical evidence or examining the facts, will never accept vaccination because they believe in something else.
because this science was the most thorough global partnership to develop a vaccine in history, becasue more scientists than ever were involved in peer review, and the studies are all redily available online, presented transparently. Can I ask what your experience in scientific method is?
Why are people still getting tested positive for Corona, when they have taken double dose (sometimes booster dose too) of vaccines??
Because the vaccine doesn't work 100% and while infection is still possible it reduces drastically the odds of a severe infection.
It is not a cure. Please understand this fact. It is designed to build anti-bodies to the target protein spike that is present in the virus which causes the infection to take hold. The vaccine introduces the spike protein (not the virus) into the body as to trigger a natural immune response. Then when the virus comes along and tries to attach to your bodies immune system, T Cells already exist to fight off the protein before the virus can take hold. Think of it as a condom approach instead of a vasectomy !!!
You should have listened: vaccines DO NOT protect from getting Covid but it lowers the severity especially for older people. New study also suggesta a 15% lower chance of developing Long Covid, a condition uncurable as of today.
Because there is no such thing as 100% immunity.
Nobody has ever claimed that.
If you are going through rt-pcr test which is invented by kary mullis they only said that rt-pcr not made for test corona virus or any other virus they state that they make it for there own research.
Basically rt-pcr is showing fals positive and negetive report!!
If you are persuaded by this, good luck to you
Vaccines save 2Million lives+ a year, NO studies have shown vaccines to be linked to any significant mortality. And ALL medication, literally all of it, has negative side effects in a small percentage of it's users. The testing simply makes sure these negative reactions are in a small enough minority for it to be relatively safe. For Covid they did rush it a little but the lives saved from it being available sooner out-weighed the risk of lesser testing. And to people who feel like they have a very low chance of having issues from covid or long-covid then fair enough, avoid the vaccine (younger people get long covid easier due to overactive immune systems, older people die from covid more, there's a sweetspot in the middle where you're at low risk to both).
Leftover ad dollars… it’s like they aren’t even trying anymore
@@xermaster123 Propaganda spam bot has been detected! Alert!
If there safe how come they have liability protection?
Because every medication has side effects.
@@Sir-Complains-a-Lot and they pulled baycol off the market for only 50 deaths worldwide. Hmmmm
@@Sir-Complains-a-Lot yeah so mRNA is a medication?
@@dissarray6906 Yes the vaccines, which this video is about, are medications in the sense that you always have to look at the gains and risks to see if it makes sense to take them. And maybe you just dont know this but every medication CAN CAUSE unwanted effects and therefore brings risk. And since the american law system is very bad companies have to protect themself against that.
@@Sir-Complains-a-Lot tbh that's no excuse a good vaccine has no great side effects in like 99 procent of cases
This is science. But when you have politics and money along with some psychology involved, it is completely a different story.
I am a biomedical scientist, by the way.
Tell me about how the story is completely different!
It is a business and power.
Oh, sure you are
this is $cience
Yes. Capital
How safe is safe? There's always a risk, it's about managing risks. That's why the certain vaccines are not recommended for certain groups of people.
This video is a gross oversimplification and more of a "just take our word, move along nothing to see here" take.
it’s totes ‘$afe & effective’ dude, even under E.U.A. ...... that $peed of $cience’ said so. BELIEVE !!!
"Pregnant people..."
I don't take medical advice from people who failed Biology 101, Class 1, Day 1.
👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽
you can call woman people too mate
@@supersnizelz The only reason is to advance the lies of the gender blender k industry
Safe ? Why the majority Labs does not provide full support for patient ?
It's amazing what a study on a few rats can tell you
I also understand a thing or two about rats myself. That's why I don't trust covid vaccines, mainstream media, central banks, usurers and FTX
8 to be precise! 😂
Funny she didn't mention the results of the animal trials.
normally you don't proceed if it fails cuz otherwise you have no data at all cuz the animal just dies remember it's 10X the dosage
@@supersnizelz The animals were maimed en mass. They continued anyway.
@@rahmega7 absolute rubbish, where are you getting this nonsense from.
They skipped the animal trails with the original vaccines...
How much did she make for ...humm
False!
This Woman should be Arrested!!!
Exactly!!!
Arrest her because you think she lied?
Over reaction?
You want to put everyone in jail for lying? Everyone has lied, even you.
@@lizliz4186 lying to people, leading them to their demise is not the same as lying
What part is false?
@@lizliz4186when your lies get people killed? then yea. they should go to jail. FFS
And no there was no research done on these poisonous clot shots.
Facts
Stop this TED. Wtf are you doig
For all the people who want to unsubscribe I want to say in this dark moment we are all living we need to stay strong and vigilant. New people who come here may find useful why we disagree with this propaganda. Sloth does not belong to us neither now nor never!
Just what I needed.. a cartoon to bring it down to my level to understand.....
Considering how the comments are going, some people dont even understand it with cartoons
@@Power_to_the_people567 well there's also that problem that a blanket statement that vaccinations are safe is a lie. Most are. Not all.
Given recent results, I would say that stating categorically that they are safe is anti-scientific at a minimum. Let's take the MRNA vaccine for instance. It's intended to be injected intramuscularly. That is because the MRNA packets instruct cells to make and express viral proteins. Those cells are in turn identified by T cells as potentially infected and are instructed to apoptos or lyze. That is the source of the significant inflammation and pain that you feel with this particular type of vaccine.
Now think for a second. The MRNA vaccine causes your own cells to express viral proteins, and then those cells are in turn damaged or destroyed in the process of recognizing those viral proteins and ultimately producing antibody against them. That's fine if it's a few muscle cells in your shoulder.
What happens if that vaccine is accidentally applied IV? Now you're talking about infecting endothelial cells of your blood vessels. And where do veins carry things rather quickly? To your heart and lungs. Suddenly all these documented issues with lung inflammation and cardiac myocyte damage make a lot more sense. Instead of harmlessly losing a few muscle cells, now you're causing crucial cells in your heart and lungs to express viral proteins, and those cells are in turn targeted by your own immune system.
Now none of this is controversial, it's not even debated at this point. You have only to look on PubMed to find exactly what I'm talking about. And to claim that these vaccines are categorically safe is nothing short of a lie.
No understand me. I'm very much Pro vaccination. I have every vaccination that I have been permitted to get. I do not have smallpox, or hpv, although I would like both of those. Giving my prior career I've been vaccinated against a lot of things that are rare in the United States but more common in Africa. Calling me anti-vax only reveals your own bias and ignorance.
And claiming that vaccines, categorically, are safe, likewise reveals your bias and or ignorance and or fundamental dishonesty.
If you're going to claim to be Pro science, you have to be honest about the science. And you are not.
@The Barking Mouse You are assuming I said all vaccines are safe. I haven't made that claim. So all of your comment boils down to you arguing a strawman against me and you follow it by an attempt to ridicule when you asume you know anything about me.
@@Power_to_the_people567 that's what the video is saying. And that is blatantly incorrect. And it takes very little effort to get on PubMed and understand why. I like TED talks for the most part, but for some reason they are giving into this propaganda. It's better to be honest with people. If given incorrectly x vaccine can be dangerous. If a person is sensitive and suffers allergies, they can be dangerous. A live, or attenuated viral vaccine given to a person who is immune compromised can be very dangerous.
It's simplistic presentations like this and what is supposed to be a forum for informed people is inexcusable. I can understand saying this to a third grader, but not an adult audience. And lies like that or what cause people to have legitimate concern.
I got the moderna vaccine and booster, despite my understanding of how mRNA vaccines work, because at the time we did not know yet how dangerous covid was and I have elderly parents so I was willing to take the risk to protect them. Now that I know that vaccine neither prevents you from getting the disease, nor does it prevent you from spreading the disease, but it only reduces your own symptoms. I would have not gotten the vaccine knowing that. It's not worth the risk to my lungs and heart. And ultimately both my parents and myself got covid despite being vaccinated. I've had it twice more since then. In that case, the danger of the vaccine far outweighs the benefit to me.
TED Talks are supposed to be for reasonably intelligent and sophisticated people. And this kind of propagandistic simplistic inaccurate presentation is an insult.
@The Barking Mouse So what exactly in this video was a lie and can you post the paper in PubMed that supports your claim?
Your anecdote is irrelevant to the conversation. But if you want to go based on that. Then you have just agreed and admitted that the vaccine reduces the symptoms.
Now compare symptoms between the number of non-vaccinated VS the vaccinated.
The numbers don't lie, the vaccine reduced the mortality f the virus.
The common cold, polio, etc... killed many people, now look at how many can survive it due to medicine and vaccines. And look at how many have died when they didn't get vaccinations or proper medicine.
I appreciate your skepticism, but including biases, anecdotes, and anti-establishment arguments does not reflect proper skepticism but rather, blind distrust.
All legal medicines and treatments being used could be called "Safe". But you shouldn't take them unless you need them. Many if not most people do not need to take a Covid 19 vaccine. We do not know about the long term effects and unforeseen consequences of such blanket vaccination.
Under what basis do you say that most people do not need to take the covid 19 vaccine? Based on what evidence? What studies have you performed that agree with that conclusion?
@@Power_to_the_people567 Most people, especially under 50's and children, have healthy immune systems and can easily deal with a Covid infection. Covid only poses a serious risk to specifically vulnerable and elderly people. As most people are not in that specifically vulnerable or elderly category then most people do not need to take it.
This guy with his objectively hilarious username "Objective Morality" does not concern themselves with things such as brain or organ damage. Over the many years of suckling on lead pipes, ingesting industrial waste, being gassed by trucks and who knows what else, they have calloused their brain with repetitive damage and strain. There is no more risk for this one to be hurt by anything, for this vegetable is already boiled.
@@ICouldntThink0faName Truly sad.
lol. please watch the video. because from your comment its painfully clear that you either havent watched or understood it at all.
If Vaccines are safe...then why can I not hold the Pharmaceutical company liable if something bad happens? If they are so safe, where is my garantee that they are safe and why cant I choose my own vaccine schedule?
No steps were skipped? 11 years is the minimum, not 2 years. Human rights have been violated. The people who made this video should be investigated.
obvious propaganda is obvious.
How so?
Okay this is enough, unsubbed.
Why are my comments being deleted?
gain of function and blood clots
Covid itself had a higher chance of giving you blood clots than the vaccine did, lmao.
People are getting blood clots from the virus.
I only trust Alex Jones, Tucker Carlson and Jesus Christ...
@@marco12377 yikes.
@@Bry.89 I agree, it wasn't an obvious enough joke?
In your defense, people actually say that kind of thing lol.
Vaccine....or gene therapy.
@Florian Fischer-Zernin You are "appealing to fallacy" when none has been committed
@@Power_to_the_people567 The appeal to authority fallacy is the logical fallacy that Florian is referencing. "The Science" being the authority that Make Racists Afraid Again is appealing to. The same "Science" that said that the Covid Vaccine is safe and effective when later we learned that it is not safe after many vaccinated have contracted myocarditis among other things and that it's not effective in preventing the spread nor contraction of Covid. Furthermore, you should understand that "Scientific" studies are paid for by someone and that someone is paying for a desired outcome in a lot more cases than you might realize.
@Growing Against the Grain Nice way of misrepresenting what science is.
What do we call that.... ah yeah, we call it a strawman fallacy.
Science is not an entity. It is a process.
And scientific studies undergo a peer review process that eliminates any bias or conflicts of interests.
You are both strawmaning science, and appealing to fallacies that do not apply at all.
You are also making generalizations and assumptions on your statement.
"Myocarditis is rare, but when it occurs, it is most commonly caused by an infection in the body. Infections from viruses (most common, including those that cause the common cold, influenza or COVID-19), bacteria, fungus or parasites can lead to myocardial inflammation."
You are assuming the vaccine caused myocarditis when in fact the cause is the covid 19 virus
You lost me at "pregnant People" . In my day vaccines made you immune to a disease.
So thankful the polio vaccine wasn't as crappy as the covid vaccine
Hmm considering that the vaccine at the base of the current lawsuit against the US military has not been approved by the FDA this video may or may not be valid.
Pro - vaccine ads should not be spread on a platform like TH-cam. Such ads should belong to the vaccine manufacturer and should belong on platforms such vaccine manufacturers manage.
BS
This video is all well and good if followed.... IMO The latest round of V's were NOT tested as thoroughly as previous V's such as Polio and Rubella V's....
Well luckily nothing depends on what some guy thinks... but the actual trials, data and the research beforehand.
@@Sir-Complains-a-Lot show me the data that won't be released for 66 years
@@kbarrett63 Youre tripping dude. the potential use of mRNA, the techniques used and the development of vaccines in general has been in medical science publications for over 30 years now. maybe instead of "informing" yourself you should actualy take time and try to understand how medical science works. That would also have the benefit that you wouldnt embarrass yourself further.
@@Sir-Complains-a-Lot why do you have to personally attack the person asking a simple question? is it because you are insecure and can't actually back up what you say? I think so.
@@neiltroppmann7773 This is hilarious, cause the science behind the vaccines is very clear, but you just ignore that again and again to ask some stupid question that just shows how little time you actualy took to research the topic. And yes i attack you personaly because you seem to think your ignorance is a blessing.
Are comments not allowed? May I not suggest books or videos as an alternative point of view to what is presented here?
Still not taking it so bugger off.
never buy into their lies.
Unsubscribed✔
This has actually been on my mind for a while, thank you to those who wrote that and gave me inspiration
Thanks for your effort. You're a brave soul.
You weren't subscribed in the first place 🤣 dramatic much
Don’t do it please. People may find useful why you don’t agree with what these people do in this channel.
MRNa around for decades, but not tested on humans. They are "... unlikely to harm humans".
I’m sure this comment section will be full of thoughtful and civilized opinions
people tend to get upset at horrifically bad advice. it's a human thing.
@Joe ...and yet peer reviewed NIH published literature upholds the toxicity proof of mRNA in hydrogel delivery systems on biological cells. There are many experiments dating back to 10, 15 years. All published and peer reviewed on the NIH website. As a research scientist who specialty was stem cell science I urge you to do your own investigation perhaps into the "safety and efficacy" retoric.
@Joe so no, the 'anti-vax' talking points do not fall apart.
@@dakotayounger6988 I only comment to gain further insight - a conflict is not of interest.
I stumbled across Chang Yang Gong et. al. 2009 (Acute toxicity evaluation of biodegradable in situ gel-forming controlled drug delivery system based on thermosensitive PEG-PCL-PEG hydrogel). Interestingly, they found that PEG-PCL-PEG hydrogel was nontoxic and could be a safe candidate for in situ drug delivery systems, despite having used relatively high concentrations. In the study by Xingyi Li et. al. 2012 (Cytotoxicity and biocompatibility evaluation of N,O-carboxymethyl chitosan/oxidized alginate hydrogel for drug delivery application) they found no obvious cytotoxic properties either for that specific hydrogel. However, note that mRNA wasn't present in the hydrogel polymers in either study.
The relatively recent study by Heidrun Steinle et. al. 2018 (Incorporation of Synthetic mRNA in Injectable Chitosan-Alginate Hybrid Hydrogels for Local and Sustained Expression of Exogenous Proteins in Cells) did however incorporate mRNA into hydrogel, and further incorporated cells into the hydrogel containing mRNA. They concluded, and I quote: "hydrogels are promising delivery systems for sustained delivery of synthetic mRNAs into cells."
So I'm not certain which type of hydrogel polymer you refer to, or which study specifically when it comes to the toxicity of hydrogel delivery systems on biological cells. So please enlighten me with your personal findings. As I initially stated, I would love to gain further insight - if only to obtain more knowledge on the subject matter.
I'm looking forward to hear from you and what your research has yielded.
Okay,and now I feel bad for the animals that the scientist were using to be tested on
> 30 Minutes
> 101 Comments
How many of these comments are legitimate, I wonder...
I don't need to be a helicopter pilot to know it's a bad thing when one goes spiraling out of control.
dude not to take away from some of the idiocy here but 101 comments in 30 minutes is completely normal
@@remyllebeau77 hmmm this deep analogy. Clearly the same as the ability to read scientific litterature ... You are a proof of Duning Kruger Effect tho
@@teddyboyat3109 Not an argument
The best part of being a conspiracy theorist is not having m y o c a r d i t i s
Dude. Same name and same situation as u, that’s sick 🤟🏼
I see you didn’t get COVID then, given its high rates of causing (peri/)myo- carditis.
@@thelastpillar4973 actual medical studies (Singer et. al, 2022, Bozkurt et. al, 2021, Patone et. al, 2021, among many others) did. Care to provide your own counter-evidence? Oh sure, just delete your message now. How sad.
What is she talking about???
What big money does she take for that big fakes?
You are being incredulous.
Tell that to the people who were injured and can't have kids anymore
And with that, I can no longer watch TED talks 😂😂😂😂
The other day, that same woman pretended that all the sleep problems explained in various "life coaches" videos were false. I was surprised because they always put the sources of their statements and they're really serious.
Now this same woman starts with "the covid vaccine is perfectly safe". Bye bye ted talks, has been going knowing you.
Going further into your bubble.
Girl probably thinks the earth is flat and created 6000 years ago, too...
Yeah. I just unsubscribed.
@@SKI1333 Don't look too close at your food Supply Chain mate - you will have to stop eating too !!!
Maybe safe for most but not for all. Severe side effects are rare until they happen to you. At that point, no doctors can help you.
Help? Ha. The pHARMafia shames and goes after those who call the clot shots out.
ימח שמם. Damned be them.
Shalom:) from Israel~pfizerland
The same goes for every medicine ever made. No pharmaceutical company can guarantee us that their meds are safe for every individual.
If it is safe for most, then the right thing to do is to save the majority. If we lived by only looking at rare cases then we wouldn't have any medicine, no surgery, etc...
young people are dying at unprecedented levels in britain after the vax rolled out. hmmmmm
@Caffeinated Frostbite Do you have any evidence that directly links those deaths to the vaccine?
Usually, animal models translate nicely to humans. With vaccines, I have no confidence, because in the animals, they never look into toxicity much, and then when they do the human trials, they make sure that toxicity is low by diluting the vaccine, but never properly test for efficacy. You can just tell the story, that there's some real stuff in there, but it's so little it won't hurt you (or the virus). I mean during polio or was it the first asian flu pandemic, they literally ran out of material so they just diluted it, knowing nobody would be the wiser.
these "awake" anti-vax replies are hysterical
Just remember how hysterical provaxers are. How hard they tried to oppress people.
They send their police forces to oppress people who were simply demonstrating for their mere freedom rights.
How hysterical they were, they nearly exploded just trying to discriminate unvaccinated people and trying to make covid vaccines mandatory.
Hilarious little idiots those are, arent they? :D
@@Steel9k BUDDY, You're here too?! How've ya been?
You don't mind if I ask for the source to this info, do you?
This propaganda being branded by TED makes me sad.
“Safe for fertility” what does that even mean? Safe is a subjective term. I don’t care about your subjective opinions, I’m an engineer, just show me the numbers so I can decide.
she means ‘$afe’
"Pregnant people"
TED should really get to talking about the autism genocide clock. Anything involving the triple tap vaccine causing autism directly caused a eugenics movement in the US, combined with Autism stereotyping, and the reinforced the motives behind Judge Rotenberg’s Center for Education (electroshock to autistic kids, 5 killed, since the 1970’s.)
One should note the intersectionality of this, because electroshock treatments were also used against the LGBT population.
Disabled people deserve to have their history talked about, and I won’t stand for people not wanting to talk about it. Period.
Seems like you have a lot to say. maybe look for someone actualy interested and try again.
@@Sir-Complains-a-Lot your input is much appreciated mr bot...
@@Regirs No, i actualy care about this topic as well, but this isnt the place for that at all. he just makes a giant dingus out of himself.
The Grey Man what are you talking about???
Autism is genetic. Vaccines don't cause it. If you really cared about autistic you would understand their history. Nothing wrong being autistic either.
Talk about misinformation. Wow. These people are evil.
I only trust Alex Jones, Tucker Carlson and Jesus Christ.
Beyond evil
@Red Herring Joined Oct 19, 2022
Bot or Troll...
What is the Covid-related mortality for non-elderly persons with no comorbidities??
Spambot found
@@jackjohnson4386 Yes, you are a propaganda spam bot. Answer the question.
@@jackjohnson4386having taken the poison your only hope is to remain in denial
@@PhilipBaker-sf4yv Wow that might be the most worthless comment I've seen in weeks from an anti-vaxxer
Bot detected
I'll stick with my immune system. Pureblood.
Back to the days where people died at 30
@@rufusrupo Do 5 mins research.
Take the jab lose immune system.
Bring back Measles!
@@rufusrupo purebloods get v*ccines. just not the c*vid v*ccine.
or any other m-R-N-A v*x
O how i hope she has had her full quota of genuine vaccines
It may be safe..but is it tested for effectiveness by having the study done against a placebo control group? Because how do we know that its the vaccine working instead of the bodys natural strength of fighting the virus?
I’m here for the comments on this one 😂😂😂
What testing of these preparations? Normally, tests are carried out before being put into use, which last a minimum of 4-10 years. No objective clinical studies have been conducted on the preparations. Someone here is lying.
No thanks
Report misiformation options were removed. Duh.
This explanation of how vaccines are developed is an incredibly meaningful. I appreciate how Dr. Gunter detailed the process and recent intervention to efficaciously streamline steps in order to provide a safe, effective vaccine during an ongoing pandemic. Unfortunately, vaccine science and technology became heavily politicized during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic with misinformation running rampant. With the pre-existing anti-vaccination movement and beliefs founded on the indisputably false claim that vaccines cause autism in children, originally stemming from critically flawed and now debunked studies by Andrew Wakefield, vaccine science and efficacy was further subjected to baseless criticism. Dr. Gunter addresses an issue with ethical implications on the individual, societal, and public health levels. As the science and healthcare community continue to establish trust with the public regarding vaccines, we as human beings and a collective society must consider our moral obligation to be vaccinated to prevent disease and death. It was the utilitarian philosopher Peter Singer who “remarked that if it is our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance, we ought, morally, to do it.” Harm prevention is a powerful argument for vaccination, and while vaccination can be mandated by government, the less controversial and more humanistic view of vaccination as a moral imperative to prevent harm to the individual, all others, and benefit the public aligns with the ethical principle of beneficence, or simply put doing good. Furthermore, Alberto Giubilini summarizes in his article published in the British Medical Bulletin that “considerations of harm prevention prevail over considerations of individual liberty.” The notion of protecting our most vulnerable individuals, especially children who have the right to be protected from preventable harm, is particularly essential to our moral obligation to receive safe, effective vaccinations. Moreover, parents must be properly informed and educated in the preventative medical care of their own children for their health and the greater good of both the public and the next generation of humans. Ultimately, vaccination and its ethical implications epitomize the connection between individual, collective, and institutional responsibility. I hope that we as a society and human beings can foster education, decisions, and policies that will support, enhance, and facilitate vaccination for the benefit of us all.
What is the Covid-related mortality for non-elderly persons with no comorbidities??
@@JK_JK_JKjust look it up
I love how 1 year ago this chat would be full of antivax oppressors, it’s a breath of fresh air seeing fellow critical thinkers
guinea pigs got played, the buyer remorse is real
Trust the experts on Ted talk, they know everything.
testing on 8 mice lol
Mice and humans are both Mamalian animals with very similar biology. Most of moderm medicine is tested on mice before giving it to the public.
@@Power_to_the_people567 Did you also know all the mice died?
@Pitchyy Where, when and how?
As of today: 7 Billion Humans
@@demian9715 I wouldnt be surprised if a majority were just saline
My comment will get scrubbed!!!
Google was pizzer co non vic Ted of a cry-me .
This video will persuade no one. To persuade the other side you have to address their actual criticisms instead of gaslighting, empathize with their viewpoint, and admit imperfection / risks.
The smart enough people already know how everything works, and the ignorant never will because they don't even want to.
There's no gaslighting here, only dumb people that don't understand enough and misinterpret science, favouring their own ignorance and prejudices instead.
Thank you so much
My wife had 2 vaccinations (Biontech/Corminarty)during her pregnancy with our now 9 month old son. He is hilarious and very healthy.
How is that possible?! I thought the anti-vaxers told me people would die because of it?
Oh wait, they keep moving the goalpost.
I'm glad it worked out. Other people have not been so lucky
@@dissarray6906 Show me the evidence. just asserting what you read on some facebook post isnt exactly making an argument.
@@Sir-Complains-a-Lot in both situation, an individual case isn't a scientific proof.... It needs peer reviewing, replication, Meta analysis, etc. Too much scepticism leads to none at all...
Doesn't really matter how much expertise or data you have - because people have OPINIONS and they've HEARD SOMEONE SAY SOMETHING and therefor you must be wrong, Dr.
This video isn't extremely well made, but people suck either way.
As if science and scientists are not corruptible. You are beyond clueless.
@@remyllebeau77 of course they are but the amount of resistance to a science that is almost as old as science itself is starting to become insane plus the comment seem to have no idea what the purpose is anyway people seem to think of it as a cure when it's in fact prevention
@@remyllebeau77 The literal existence of peer review is what helps contain corruption. The person in this video has literally nothing to gain. Literally all the so called doctors speaking out against the vaccines had monetary gain/free public exposure.
@@rikachiu Peer review is a joke. For example, "Three Scholars Dupe Peer-Reviewed Journals into Publishing ‘Academic Hoaxes’.
@@remyllebeau77 First of all, anyone can publish a paper. This is called pre-print. Actual peer reviewed papers and studies are a whole different ballpark.
Unsubscribed!!!
I went to the description box to look for links to reliable articles so I can deepen my knowledge yet such things don't exist. I'm supposed to believe her because she has 'Dr.' in front of her name?
Google Scholar is your friend. Science isn't about beliefs it is about evidence (opinion, personal experience or isolated incident isn't scientific evidence) , this video is just popularization
But I don’t think discriminating against people who didn’t get vaccinated is right though…
More than that, it is evil. These leftists are doing everything they can to bring the WEF globalist nightmare future into a reality near you. Never forget their crimes against humanity!
Safe except for the 600 million who got hurt or unalived so far - backed up by the real stats
source?
Backed up by "real" stats that you won't source, because they are total bullshit
Oh a Dr says its safe thats alright then. Not like that Dr is stuck in their own echo chamber being told to push certain drugs to patients. Its not like Drs ever told pregnant "Women" that smoking was good for their health and the babies.
Or propagated dangerous product such as Contergan (thalidomide) or dangerous vaccines for money.
wow , last time i watch anything by TED .
I'm ready for the comments XD
Like videos about possible dangers are boosted by the YT algorithms.
Remember when you couldn't even say Covid on TH-cam unless you were an approved person?
Hmmm
We will see
Natural immunity is just as good!!
Trust in God
AMEN
"Researchers already had years of knowledge and insight to work from. Scientists already knew a lot about other coronaviruses. And because of knowledge sharing they were able to simply download the virus;s genetic code off a website. They were also able to take advantage of the advances made in mRNA vaccine technology"
The Fancy way of saying they skipped clinical testing. I love how she makes this sound like a "safe" thing...lol
The video clearly states that No clinical testing was skipped. Or did you miss when the video explicitly describes the 4 phases of trials?
The first person to get an mrna vaccine was 10 years ago for cancer research.
@@steverocksyo I'd like to read about this. Post please.
@@Power_to_the_people567 which is a problem because they were. Majority of Animal testing was skipped, phase 1 trails were reduced in time and phases 3 and 2 were merged. With no real safety testing done at all, they simply tested for efficacy(efficacy defined as anti bodies get produced), you cannot safety test in that time frame. The placebo group was destroyed half way through the merged trail and offered the vaccine. Actual risk reduction of the vaccines was shown to be less then 1%, but the pharmaceutical companies promoted them as 90% effective based on relative risk reduction.
@@jollyyeholiver1578 source?
Sold!! Where can I get one?
Some places are giving out gift cards too ^^
Bla bla bla
Pregnant people ?
Whats wrong with this woman ?
aRE yOu biOLoGiST ?
@@lw1zfog I was not scripted into childish correct misinfo at college.
I fled study physics early 70th cos of mental pollution at that university , that long already leftists fanatism spreading stupidities
It is NOT okay to test on animals.