The Startling Alternative Theory of How Humans Arrived in America
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ก.พ. 2025
- On an island off the east coast of Maryland, a stone spearpoint sticking out of a coastal cliff stuns archaeologists. It asks a big question: Could humans have arrived in America 5,000 years earlier than we thought?
From the Show: Ice Bridge: The Impossible Journey bit.ly/2vfRpSA
some came over the ice bridge
some came across the ocean on boats
some came from the east
some came from the west
wake up people, nothing is as simple as we have been taught
And the real fact is there are no native Americans only immigrants traced back to the Riff Valley Africa.
It's really sad that some tribes here in the U.S. deny the science and hold to their creation myths which state that they were created in place or came out of the earth, etc. One would think they would embrace the heroic journeys the ancestors took, truly monumental undertakings over several thousand years. DNA evidence is pretty strong, indicating origins of several disparate population groups from Siberia, southern and southeastern Asia. We are all immigrants to this hemisphere!
Oh you're gone and got the qualifications? Or are you just speaking out of your rear end? Don't bore us with your brain farts
We were taught as children so they kept the story simple on purpose. Anyone digging deeper as an adult knows it is more complex. It’s not a conspiracy. No one is holding back the truth.
Look up the kelp road it was another route.
I grew up on the Chesapeake bay and as kids after the storms we would hunt for arrowheads on the beach, all kinds of thing would wash up on the South river from the bay. We would find really large blades that were completely different then the normal arrowheads. As kids we could tell that different people made the those large blades.
Very interesting 🤔 ❤❤❤
We went boating on the bay in the 70s😅😅😅
OMG! You are so frikin lucky! My dream to find an arrowhead. 😌♥️🇨🇦
I'm sure you're an expert on ancient Stone tools and the specific groups they are associated with. 🤣🤣🤣
Some scientists have suggested that hugging the edge of the Northern ice sheet (which was much farther south during the ice ages) and traveling west using kayaks, and hunting and fishing along the way, it may have been possible for stone age cultures to cross the Atlantic. The eastern native Americans tribes belief systems.seemed to have a lot in common with the ancient Celts.
They actually came from Australia they were Melanesians it's possible people also came from Europe but that would have been about 10,000 years later
A discrete population arose from probably a lone pregnant woman or small group of people sailing or rafting across the atlantic from africa to south america 120,000+ years ago in a freak event. They later mixed with the native americans who came across beringia, then the vikings et al.
@@JohnPritzlaff the bones found 120,000 years ago or Neanderthal not Homosapien
The Inuit travel the North by hide covered boats from island to island and ice sheet to ice sheet so ancient people traveling from Europe to America along the edge of the ice sheet over the Atlantic is entirely possible. Fish and Seals would have been plentiful. It has been shown that mitochondrial DNA in eastern native peoples, Iroquois for one, have Caucasian DNA, DNA that has been present long before Columbus, at around 12,000 years ago. The settling of America is complex and not restricted to one race. After the Ice Age, trans Atlantic travel would be nearly impossible until much more modern sea faring techniques arrived.
Maybe. But Genetics of later Native americans says otherwise.
Anyone who loves history knows we do not accurately know our past. Everything is up for debate(minus few exceptions) too easily is it possible for the geographical formation of the earth to simply erase the past. This happened to a great extent in the last 5/10k years in Northern Africa.
Tyler Clements its too bad that the ocean and it's creatures (esp back then) have erased all of it.. 🙁
No, the past has not been "erased". We just don't yet have the tools to properly read the signs.
We know from DNA testing that the Native Americans are actually Native to Siberia. Their ancestors were immigrants from there.
We are learning so much.
Science works by the evidence that is found. Science changes as new evidence is discovered. That is how it works.
The ancient people were much more ingenious than they are given credit for
I placed this theory thirty years ago at Sheffield University. In the periods we know as "the Ice Ages" the ice was at least two miles high. The water came from the sea which exposed the continental shelf. Land compression and tilt fro the sheer weight of the ice would have cause "uplift" of more land mass making it possible for a European to America route possible. Of cause orthodoxy poo pooed the idea.
It appears you were correct.
Some say the cro magnon were American pioneers
Add to that a very real possibility of boats being used.
What is new about this? The first Clovis point was discovered in Mexico in 1929. The only other place they've been found is the Chesapeake Bay and the coasts of France and the Iberian peninsula, with more or less the same date.
It has long been suggested that there was a North Atlantic culture during the last ice age that encompassed the European and North American land mass following the ice sheet. No one has believed that the aboriginal inhabitants of the Americas came exclusively over the land bridge to present day Alaska for decades. Modern genome research has strengthened this hypothesis. The Asian American land bridge seems to account for a large part of human migration, but not all. South American genomes suggest Pacific seafarers from Southern Asia, not of Siberian stock landed there.
They have been found in Staten Island and New Jersey as well and throughout the whole east coast.
I would agree. Not everyone came from one place.
Actually, when they say that they are referring to traces of Denisovans DNA. Some of their DNA is evident in the Australian Aboriginals and also in the America’s which simply means that some of them migrated towards the America’s and some of them migrated towards Papua New Guinea and Australia.
Who said these are Clovis points??
Looks like Graham Hancock was right after all.
My startling alternative theory of how humans arrived in America is "they took the bus from Philly".
synczozo11, yeah, I have a masters degree in lame...
Ringo Garvin - so true :/
Well, it's more likely than AMTRAK...
At least it's A theory. This video didn't offer ANY theory.
yer mom
Archaelogy is so fascinating
Just a little evidence provides endless speculation. 😅
Looking for playlist . Love new information like this. Idk why but👍
I grew up around the Chesapeake Bay and as a kid I was in the Boy Scouts and one of the Scout’s dad was an amateur archeologist who would dig deep trenches down into the ground along Tracey’s Creek in Deale, Maryland, where he’d find all kinds of Arrowheads. We visited the site where he was digging and he showed us what he’d found. I was real impressed!
The Americas where probably discovered so many times... that we will never know how many exactly.
Humanity's mental capacities have been roughly the same for 2 or 3 hundreds of thousands of years.
I remember hearing Dr Leaky in the mid 60's speak at Palomar JC here in San Diego and he talked about dating campfire remains here in SoCal to 50 thousand years.
Really? Interesting
What about Table Mountain, California, which clocks in at 50-55 MILLION years?
@@tabletalk33 What kind of remains ?
The most amazing discoveries are the Solutrean points in Delaware and the Cerutti mastodon site in San Diego.
It's exciting that archaeologist are now able to have a different point of view and not have their careers ruined for it.
Now if the climate folks would be open minded.
And then human footprints found in New Mexico were dated to between 21,000 and 23,000 years ago.
No kidding! We lost valuable scientists and research because of hubris.
i think the first time humans went into north america was when they were in hueyatlaco 250,000 years ago
@@21LAZgoo you gotta give proof after dropping a doozy like that
Puma Punku already substantiated that humans have been here much longer than we thought...
Captions, captions, captions. There are deaf people out there who might just want to watch your videos, of whom I am one.
"Although warthogs have poor vision, the tiny eyes are located high on the face, allowing greater visibility over the open plains of its habitat. They may sit up like dogs for better visibility. Warthogs have an acute sense of smell and hearing. " -Toronto Zoo
Barnaby ap Robert And some warthog are deaf.
I'm naming my next rock band "The Warthogs".
There’s a transcript! Follow along with it! Underneath the heading click ‘More…’ and you’ll see an option for viewing the transcript. Most TH-cam videos have an accompanying transcript.
we dont care
Just imagine how much evidence has eroded away into the ocean... Unless it was planted there. Would love to hear more about this though...
The subtitles uses "then" instead of the correct word "than". It seems the whole internet does not know the difference between then and than. Then is about time or sequence. Than is used to compare two things.
I found a Clovis style arrowhead near the Chesapeake Bay.
1960s and early 1990s: Siberia, Siberia Siberia.
Now: Ship from Seoul, Boat from Busan or transit from Tokyo, hold from Hokkaido, merchantman from Manila, steamboat from Shanghai, clipper from Cambodia, ironclad from Indonesia, pram from the Philippines, tugboat from Thailand, fluyt from Fiji, vessel from Vladivostok, etc.!
The person who wrote this script doesn't understand enough about science to interpret evidence.
"They were here in Chesapeake Bay around 5,000 years earlier than humans were _supposed_ to have arrived in America."
No, they were there 5,000 years earlier than humans were _known_ to have arrived in America. There was never any evidence (cite a paper if I'm mistaken) that humans hadn't been in North America earlier. The new evidence doesn't _contradict_ the old evidence. What it contradicts is the misunderstanding that lack of evidence of presence is equivalent to evidence of lack of presence. Read that last sentence as many times as it takes to absorb it. If you find the new evidence surprising, as the author of this script appears to do, then it's because you didn't understand the old evidence. If it "challenges everything you thought you knew..." then you shouldn't bother thinking you know things anymore; you don't.
It's absolutely pathetic that the official Smithsonian channel does such a shit job of interpreting science for the public. Lest you think this is an unimportant gripe, consider the fact that public (mis-)understanding of science is (partly) responsible for public policy on fracking, construction of new spill-prone oil pipelines, defense against asteroid impacts, water scarcity, sea level rise, and a thousand others.
Get it right, or shut the fuck up.
The Smithsonian: on the cutting edge of 30 years ago's science, today.
Huhuhu they are rather conservative
More like on the cutting edge of Bullshit lying propaganda and false history.,.
For example?
When you look into any science or history that goes against the "society always advances forward, the Ancients were not advanced" way of looking at ourselves, nearly every story over the last 100 years ends with the Smithsonian showing up, taking the artifacts & specimens, never to be seen again. If you watch any "alternative" history or science video on TH-cam that involves missing evidence, the Smithsonian will nearly always be the party to blame, like a historical Men In Black.
life time residents in Marylands eastern shore I've a few bi points (arrow heads)I've found over the years in the back Oriole crab island marsh area. I believe behind the champ boat dock it's called queen Ann's creek.pretty spot..
To think that, that “stone” was the pinnacle of weapon technology and here we are. Man humans are pretty smart
A person is smart, People are dumb.
Enter Username some people are smart, the rest of us dumb motherfuckers have been riding on their tail coats since time immemorial
After WW III we will go back to sticks and stones.
Enter Username unfortunately no wiser though
Except animals are much less likely to murder each other for profit, or go to war, or rape one another. Humans are generally more barbaric on all of these counts than any other vertebrate species. We're also the only species in history of the earth to drive most of the rest of life to extinction in only a few thousand years.
This is so cool. You never really have everything truly figured out.
It's known as good research.
As Firesign Theatre used to tell us..."everything you know is wrong". Turns out that they were right after all.
Greg Brockway "Porgy tirebiter.. He's a spy and a girl delighted"
I was just thinking of that album this morning. Although my quote of course is from Don't Crush that Dwarf, Hand me the Pliers.
Thanks.. Nice to not be the only dinosaur of the seventies.
But I'm the driver!
But if you knew they were right, does that mean they're wrong?
Greg Brockway- "If you lived here, you'd be home by now".
+mijlivesay, "No matter where you go, there you are" (Buckaroo Banzai)
Don’t forget the 21,000 year old footprints in White Sands.
Most certainly! The old theory of the Bering Strait land bridge as the way The Americas were populated from North to South doesn't hold water at all.
What happened to the recently discovered settlement in Chile, dated 33,000 years old?
tetekofa this is love to see them cover! I'm gunna look for this soon
Gina Kay they were found to be of the same genetic group as Australian Aboriginals, the last of that lineage were in terra del fuego until they were bred out there are a few with a small amount of that genetic material left.
DAYBROK3 That's really interesting, I've never heard of that theory before. Any links?
There wasn't any life on this planet more than 10,000 years ago. These theories are based entirely on conjecture, assumptions and ignorance.
The date at 22,000 and the Style of the bifaces are looking good for the Solutrean connection!
New Mexico footprints proves this wrong. Human footprints in New Mexico have been dated to 23,000 BCE. This is long before the land bridge opened up. If you go back to 12,800 BCE you find that the shoreline was much farther out to sea. The sea level rose of 300 ft during the Younger Dryas. I wonder what we would find if we could look at levels that were shoreline back then?
The video is 6 years old, before the footprints at White Sands were found.
@@zyxw2000 Yet it is still up on you tube. They might think to take down misinformation
@@billstapleton1084 They don't take down stuff that's a lot worse than being outdated. I've reported videos with racism, hate speech, antisemitism, and they don't remove them. Or the History Channel's constant videos about aliens visiting earth. YT 's interested only in selling advertising.
The footprints don’t prove anybody wrong. The first Americans came across both oceans in many different waves.
Back in prehistoric times, humans were constructing boats and traveled along sea shores to explore new lands.
Circa 20,000 years ago, that part of the present-day North American Plate was off the northwest coast of Africa, along with part of Scotland, and northern Ireland, according to tens of thousands of geologists.
"If confirmed' by the keepers of today's dogma.
Archelogy is like a religion with it's priests guarding their beliefs
And bending the truth to their beliefs.
Yes exactly like Pentagons Christian’s getting on Intel committees and blocking all UFO UAP etc info from getting out. They forget there were breakaway civilisations from the ancient astronauts.
Biface: the Neanderthals did that....
Now just hold on a minute. They can't be the first "Native Americans" if they "came" to these shores. Let's use language correctly, you are, after all, the Smithsonian Channel. Precision should be a hallmark of scientists.
Proto european peoples were also in asia ,in prehistoric times and could also have crossed from siberia into americas. 😮
I found a human fossil footprint and a stone tool in western New York 40 years ago and I still have been. Would you like to see them?
Dr. Dennis Stanford : the seven caves have been located in the superstition mountains a pre - Olmec jasper hand tool has been found at the site that could be matched to Clovis and Olmec stone tools .. the shaman stone is about two inches long and one inch wide ...it has 3 small holes and some kind of cutting shaping tool for making flute shapes ...? the site was most like for trading stone work .. it dates to around 25,000 BCE or older ... .IMHO ...the jasper is of the highest quality and orange reddish tan ..multi color the tool has some of the same features as the tools in La venta Mexico .....I found a 5 foot square block cube still hooked to the bed rock ... and some other signs of early culture being there ...I am plain my expedition 7 , the Chichimec codex shows the birth of Quetzalcoatl and the Olmec La venta museum dated the first stone showing Quetzalcoatl to be around 15,000BCE so we no for a fact the site is older then 15,000 BCE .and they quality of the stone work makes the site at least 20,000 BCE if not 25,000 BCE ...here is the real kicker ... sir .. the rare jasper has super fine wire gold in it , if this tool was made from the catacombs that I believe are under the seven caves then it means the cloves points were being trade from the seven caves to other tribes .....
Wow, two disproven hypotheses at the same time: the silutrian hypothesis and Clovis first
Um... neither have been "disproven". That's not actually how these things work.
You don't disprove ANYTHING in far-times archeology.
The narrator. Is. So. Intense. So. Gripping.
The Cerutti mastodon site in San Diego is 130,000 years old , so the fact that humans were in the Americas 20,000 should not be a surprise to any archaeologists.
We need some geology on this. That layer might have been folded or sublimated in some way.
That does happen. Startling claims need a lot of attention and investigation.
As for me, I do believe that a vast culture existed during the recent glaciation period of the current Ice Age. High Bronze Age, or even Iron Age. 25,000 years ago...
There's a lot more that has been found besides those spear points in the exposed layers. For one, a fisherman recovered a Solutrean laurel leaf point with a 22,000 year old mastodon skull off the coast. Most of the habitation sites are probably on the continental shelf, a few miles from the mainland.
@@brantdanger Yea! Reply to 3 year old comment. Nevertheless, thank you for the info provided. This kind of stuff really interests me.
why is hueyatlaco always denied when it has evidence that is many times stronger than sites that are more widely known
Sea levels as low as 300 feet may have exposed islands throughout the Pacific other than those we see today.
Certainly more of the Galapagos would have been visible, perhaps others, somehow people made it to the Hawaiian islands, it wouldn't be that much of a stretch to think of ice being farther up in the South helping natives to migrate over both ice and more exposed islands.
Just 100 feet drop in sea levels may have exposed enough for passage via more islands and there was a 300 drop for a time.
Migration that way could have allowed settling in Mexico and the Caribbean areas then up into the Chesapeake Bay area well before those who migrated south from the land bridge.
They may have beaten those who would have faced ice and the prevailing winds of the Atlantic to the Chesapeake Bay area.
Speculation on my part.
flash forward 6 years and the arrival date is now being pushed back 20 something thousand years
What? Tell me what the other route is damn it!
This isn't new! Twelve years, ago pre-Clovis points were found on the east coast, mainly Maryland, that dated to more than 20 thousand years ago. European seafarers, skirting the edge of the then ice sheets that extended down the east coast of America, across the Atlantic to Europe, allowed them to colonize the "New World". Clovis stone point technology began in Europe, southern France and Spain, and was further refined in the Americas. Human exploration at the time contributed to the development of peoples we now call "Native Americans".
This information is new to pretty much everyone who’s never heard it. It’s definitely it mainstream. School kids still learn the Bearing Straight theory primarily and then straight to Columbus discovering America.
So now..we need to consider the archeological finds in San Diego. The Cerutti Mastadon site goes back to 130000 years.
DNA of the various Indigenous groups can trace their origin to Peoples from other parts of the world.
You can go to Tikal and see structures 40,000+ years old, and it is common knowledge. Humans have traveled the oceans for tens of thousands of years. Almost no tribes of North or South American people subscribe to the Bering Straight theory.
It's not "common knowledge". It's based entirely on conjecture, speculation and assumptions -- not science.
@@Bob-dz6rr Perhaps not from your institution. There is a real world with equally intelligent people outside of that, and in that world, it is common knowledge.
These days it's all "Whaaaaaaaa! I can't get a signal on my cell phone! Whaaaaaa!" or "I have to go to the grocery store again!?" lol
There 'Native Americans' in Greenland too. They could have enter from the east and west coast.
Amazing
Stop calling them “native American” if they migrated from somewhere else. That idiot actually said “it’s interesting to find where they came from and when”. Native means from a place originally.
People have been here much much longer than imagined. Archelogist just need to dig deeper!
It’s pretty obvious that archeologists have no idea how the first humans came to the Americas and from where and how far back. They were here a lot longer than people suspected
@bjdon99 They were here a lot longer than people suspected MAYBE because they originated here.
Really? What methods were used to determine this?
Nothing new. So Amerindians came earlier than thought. It stands to reason that not all of the migrating groups went the same way once in North America.
The idea is that the first humans in the Americas came from the Solutreans of Europe, across the Atlantic ice (rather than Asians over Beringia). It is "politically incorrect" to explore this idea.
Dna and etymologies of all the natives independently trace back to Siberian natives. No European language or genepool. That is way more accurate than soil dating and rocks.
Bosun Higgs
Nothing here is “politically incorrect” it’s just science. In fact the first humans in the Americans were Australian aborigines then Asian natives.
"On a completely different route"
Ok.. What route?! What's being suggested? Across the pacific? Across the Atlantic? What?
The Atlantic. The first humans in America were Europeans.
@@ramonacosta2647 No, they were Asians/native americans. Plus even before the Vikings Polynesians made it to SA.
@@faarsight Not the Vikings. They didn't exist 20,000 years ago. Europeans crossed the Atlantic 20,000 years ago and brought with them their spearpoint technology.
@@ramonacosta2647 Eh, no. "Asians" did. Native Americans crossed from the Bearings strait side and are more closely related to asians than europeans.
@@faarsight The Asiatics came across the Bering Land Bridge 5000 years after Europeans crossed the Atlantic. There was no Bering Land Bridge 20,000 years ago. The arrow heads found on the east coast of North America resemble those found in Europe at the same time, not those found in Asia. Furthermore these types of arrow heads become less common as one moves from east to west, indicating that they spread from the east into the west.
they came across the ice pack during the ice ages
Gary Panter That’s an old theory and there is new evidence that proves that there were people already living in the Americas
Most early humans probably came to the Americas by boat, following the coastline or ice pack.
silly guys.. there was no one else here when I got here.. that is why I live on the west coast... I have a calendar from 21, 000 years ago to prove my point... and it's not clovas...
"Clovis".
They act like this land was empty of people. There were always people in the Americas!!!!!
Expand on that pls
you, your they
there wasnt anyone in north america before 250,000 years ago which is when a carved mastadon pelvis pops up
In the PNW, I had a native friend's grandmother say, White people always get it backward. we were always here and traveled out over the land bridge over there. I do know a friend of mine has a bone game piece (Type of gambling in the PNW) that dates back to 50,000 years ago and is genetically related to his family.
Does Maryland have a West Coast?
Perhaps even more reason to show respect for our native / aboriginal ancestors? Wrongly appropriating their land has not been the biggest issue, it's also the human rights abuses. (Some native reserves still don't have drinking water here in Canada.)
you guys need to wake the hell up. people have been here a lot longer than 20,000 yrs ago.
sheez... SMELL THE COFFEE PEOPLE!!!
More than likely folks came from several directions. What happened when ,and if, those people met is what's interesring. Wanna smell coffee, let's smell it. Week , small , peaceful groups were either absorbed or wiped out buy those thar came later. What do you think Rob?, am I on target?
Such arrogance! Were you here 20,000 years ago? You've been duped by fake science.
Who stuck it in the wall? Get fingerprints
Fingerprints would only help if we had someone to match them to.
What's the alternative theory of HOW?
The biggest clues are going to be in human DNA.
This is not a maybe, it's a fact. Artifacts found in Siberia across the bering straight where "Native Americans" came from are not even remotly similar. It's no coincedence that 99% of bi facial's found are on the east coast.
Welcome to Golgumbaz!
Don’t give them anything 😅😅😅
So did the current native Americans displace the earlier native Americans?
i think technically the people who were in mexico 250,000 years ago are the "real" natives
@@21LAZgoo Debatable. Human history is one continuum of monopolize and replacement migrations. Whoever claims belong to any one region relies on their ancestral cultural history to inform their judgement, which is of a relatively short time span.
Maybe the producers of the video don't understand the meaning of the word "native"?
My comment was meant as rhetorical irony, but you have spelt out my thoughts exactly.
Virginia Steen-McIntyre and her team uncovered stone tools and mammoth bones that date back to between 40 000 and 280 000 (yes, you read that correctly: two hundred and eighty THOUSAND) years ago at Hueyatlaco in the Valsequillo Basin near Puebla city in Mexico, back in the 1960s. She was vilified and kicked out of the archaeological community as a result, showing just how "open-minded" scientists really can be. This anomaly has STILL not been resolved! This suggests that there were hominids in Central America BEFORE the accepted Bering Strait land bridge crossing and even long before modern man supposedly migrated out of Africa.
So points similar to Clovis at least 5,000 years before Clovis? Interesting. Because there might be a lot of Federal funding on the line here, d' y' think there might be political marching, carrying signs, and sit-ins?
We have too little Archaeology data and waaaay too much biased Anthropology and other Culturally Lensed data. Can igettaalttle more signal and less noise, please? What about maybe 100k yr old find in San Diego county recently??? hmmm
The San Diego site is a little too hot for them to handle. They can only advance a little at a time. As Mortimer Wheeler used to say, "Archeology is not a science, it's a vendetta."
The Smithsonian only wants us to know what it wants us to know. What did they do with all the Egyptian artifacts from the Grande Canyon?
What did you do with your alien spaceship?
Escape, why are you a lying sack of shit? Buddhism frowns on your lies. The Fourth Buddhist Precept is written in the Pali Canon as Musavada veramani sikkhapadam samadiyami, which usually is translated "I undertake the precept to refrain from incorrect speech." The Fourth Precept has also been rendered "abstain from falsehood" or "practice truthfulness." Zen teacher Norman Fischer says the Fourth Precept is "I vow not to lie but to be truthful."
Barnaby ap Robert Buddhism, what a joke...
We need to find some bones and show they are Caucasian from Europe. Shouldn’t be too hard to do if we just wanted to
Even if they found them, they would be consigned to some dark shelf in a huge warehouse, Indiana Jones style. To do otherwise would be "racist."
"If confirmed". In other words, let's not rewrite the history books, yet.
"If" the dating ( 20,000 years ago) turns out to be true.....Local archaeologists dated the soil and Dennis believes he can date the tools to the same time frame. OK, cool, maybe, I'm open minded, but you gotta admit, it's better for Dennis if the tools are from 20,000 years ago, better for Smithsonian too. Everyone needs content. Stones and dating pops up a lot in the Alternative history sphere.
This doesn't seem startling to me. The prevailing theory of the Bering crossing has always seemed overly simplistic to me. Another possible route shouldn't shock us at all.
I am just gonna say it; The Solutreans did make it to America. It's the best evidenced migration that happened.
The Solutrean hypothesis is not particularly new, but archaeology is slow to consider new ideas.
But the video is 6 years old.
She is wrong...It's 20,000 or more years and they came from Europe across Atlantic.
What do genetics indicate?
Awesome
Say what race they were that were here first. They weren’t mongoloids. Say their origin. Say they were Europeans & stop lying
europeans did not exist as you know them prior to 5000 years ago really.
@@mynameudste lol explain Cro Magnon man, cheddar man, etc
There’s a theory that humans actually started in the new world and spread from there.
No, hominids arose in Africa.
whats the DNA trail say?
Reported as "Spam or misleading".
Loooool what
Since we already know people were living in the Western US thousands of years before this, 22,000 in Utah., we are presented with a new picture of human migration.
El volumen de voz del relator estaba demasiado fuerte en relación a las locuciones de los científicos. El mapa debió mostrar el mar de color azul...///The voice volume of the narrator was too strong in relation to the locutions of the scientists. The map must have shown the sea blue-coloured...
Gee, it's almost like science!
how stupid , why couldn't there have been multiple routes , or histories ! which of course there were and are !
You don't know archeologists. They only move by tiny increments. If anybody in the profession gets out ahead of the pack without absolutely irrefutable evidence (and sometimes even with it!) they will come down on that guy like a ton of bricks. His career could be over in no time. Extreme caution is advised.
They need to stop saying the first this the first that.. keep digging. You will find answers.
Do any of these archaeologists bother to ask the indigenous people when they got here?
Kelp highway, bitches!!!
Brian Garrow
For once we agree. I have a house in the country in Virginia right where the Chesapeake Bay meets the Potomac river. I found a Clovis point arrowhead on a trail in the woods. Later I saw that program you must have seen where the thick kelp allowed early stone age Europeans to migrate to America long before we thought.
thick kelp?
What do you mean?
Interesting very could work ive walked on grass on top of water for miles
Ice Edge hypothesis
That's what I'm saying! West Coast baby!
However the first people arrived, or by what route, if they arrived from somewhere else, they cannot be described as ‘native.’ It’s a misuse of language.
Lol. No.
20,000 years is long enough to consider them native.
Their book, Across Atlantic Ice: The Origin of America's Clovis Culture, was hammered in the Archaeological world for their claims. Interesting book but not enough evidence to support their claims.