Perspectives on deviance: Differential association, labeling theory, and strain theory

[@tyleralger6083]

I understand strain theory much better than string theory :)

[@axelsprangare2579]

Haha yes.

[@disturbingthenormies113]

Thanks! This definitely helped me in understanding Deviance :)

[@mackenziemackenzie2700]

+Disturbing the Normies 28798 people watched the video. We are the only two commenters. We are exhibiting deviant behavior!!!! :)

[@stassysm5807]

You should have mentioned the main representatives of each theory...Thats what professors will ask for suree.
Theory of labeling-Howard Becker
Interactionist theory-(Diff.Association)- Sutherland

[@Narekah]

And strain theory: Robert Merton

[@rosekocak2724]

Thanks! This Becker's theory, it should be mentioned...

[@_aidid]

Deviation is not necessarily bad and it may be good too.

[@xtelevisionset]

Einstein was a deviant. Deviance is how new ideas are formed and how society progresses. Deviance is how efficiency is refined.

[@jodiiwilson7282]

thank you

[@sahaara5143]

Good but can hardly hear it, volume too low.

[@nandagopalmng7069]

nice very use full

[@aqueelahellzey5894]

Great information.

[@isaacmijangos]

what do differential association and labeling theories have in common ?

[@georgegonzalez9241]

All three are sociological trait theories

[@NonStopGaming15]

well done

[@jasonbrandwein6345]

5:14 is strain theory :)

[@chissstardestroyer]

One thing I'd cite for Deviance is the Early Christians in the days of Imperial Rome: we were definitely seen as deviant in a lot of ways- especially the devout Catholics of those days.

[@lukegarcetti1104]

Christianity began as a cult so it definitly was seen with some deviance, out of the norm beliefs

[@chissstardestroyer]

@@lukegarcetti1104 Well, yes and no; because Christianity is, first and foremost in its structure, a way of life; in essence, it is a philosophy as well as a religion.
It is supposed to be different from the norm, totally right and good to be that way. What we're supposed to be, myself included, is a form of "moral elite", the "best of the best, morally speaking" for clarity's sake. And that *is* a deviant trait: to be in the category of the best is to deviate from the norm.
The adage goes that if everybody's heading off a cliff, do you go along to get along when everyone's headed for suicide, or do you by deviating from the norm save yourself and possibly influence others to do the same, thus irritating the monster at the base of the cliff seeking to devour those who go off? The answer is of course you go against the grain and save yourself. But that's the thing: we aren't to care what most people are doing, one bit. We are only to care about what's right, ethically-speaking.

[@jayboycanomay8470]

how about the humanist theory of deviance?

[@williamfielder2620]

At @1:02 wouldn't social constructivism be more appropriate to look at deviance with since it looks at the society's values, beliefs, and norms versus just individual interactions.

[@scorpiomichelle153]

Well great job explaining to a better understanding. But why use more of color than whites? 2 to 1. To state that one is influenced by color. You have just labeled that of color is deviance. When talking about labels the way you have you will cause a reaction like the one I have, and you feel others of color should not react.

[@Leotalicious]

Volume is too low! Nice explanation however.

[@beeedril_7991]

Quiet as shit turn up the mic volume mf got damn