COCKPIT VIEW - AV-8B Harrier II's Amazing Vertical Take-off & Landing

Cockpit footage of U.S. Marine Corps AV-8B Harrier II pilots as they take-off and landing on an amphibious assault ship and also a runway.
0:00~ Intro
0:41~ Take-off
2:07~ Aerial Refueling
3:14~ Landing
5:17~ In-Flight
Click here to Subscribe USA Military Channel: th-cam.com/users/subscription_...
Film Credits: U.S. Marine Corps video by LCpl Madison Blackstock, Sgt Abbey Perria, Cpl August Light, CWO4 Michael Kropiewnicki, SSgt Theodore Bergan, Sgt Gavin Umboh, Cpl Christian Cortez
The appearance of U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) visual information does not imply or constitute DoD endorsement.

[@british_772]

The AV-8B Harrier II is a beautiful ground-attack aircraft^^

[@pjdava]

USA Military Channel, This is fantastic! I subscribed because I love it!

[@gigaboat]

love the engine sounds

[@adayama]

最後なんだこれと思ったら複座型のTAV-8Bじゃないですか？貴重な映像をありがとうございます。

[@takegoodcareoftheforestdew5339]

Lovely to see them still flying in the US and equally sad that they're not in the UK.

[@lanfrancopignoli5553]

Few AV-8B are still flying with Italian Navy

[@dogmandan79]

Still a great jet.

[@hunterws]

What is the cord hot glued to the 'ceiling' (cowling)? My guess is detcord for ejection.

[@stanleybuchan4610]

MDC. Miniature Detonation Chord. To blow the canopy out during ejection.

[@usi-tmwegd]

ハリアー良いな~

[@user-qy4hv4cu3q]

コックピットは好きですよ、其に入れたら空母、揚陸艦、等の管制塔好きです

[@user-uv2ew1dm3w4_5]

สวปป๊อกๆๆๆๆๆ

[@wernerhaase2632]

Schneller geht nicht !!😊

[@user-fk7kr2nr7o]

ハリアー師匠ができるロマン機動

[@spaceenemiesnovel]

Was the aerial refuel in Europe? The tanker is German.

[@furunyaru]

風見鶏ついてる～

[@centerfield2740]

ハリアーってホント良いネーミング。
ホバリングするチュウヒの如く。

[@wayneschaufenbuel4964]

The Navy doesn't have a dedicated tanker

[@raidentactical4587]

まだ、現役だと！？

[@happychappy492]

I wonder if so because I heard they were taken out of service?

[@raidentactical4587]

@@happychappy492
Sorry I don't forget English.....
Please Japanese tooking

[@leeee8550]

2026年で完全退役だぞ

[@happychappy492]

@@raidentactical4587 should have translate on right click

[@happychappy492]

@@raidentactical4587 Its ok👍

[@lanfrancopignoli5553]

I've never understood why the Navy uses a flexible probe for in-flight refueling while the Air Force uses a rigid probe.

[@mdbryan9525]

Could it possibly be that the Air Force uses a Boeing KC-135 and the Marines use a 130 with a much slower airspeed ?

[@robhartley3930]

Historically, the air force refuelling was started with the big bombers, and the rigid boom has a faster transfer rate that they required. Only they use this method. All other countries use the flexible basket method as this takes less space and can do multiple aircraft at once.

[@tbolt18]

The navy want to keep the ability of performing buddy-buddy air refueling between fighters. As it was at the beginning. It gives some autonomy for the Fleet to perform quick refueling with their own aircraft. No need to wait for big tanker on the other side of the world.

[@CoondawgPD]

Navy/Marine Corps uses all kinds of tankers. When I was in they had A-6, F-18 and C-130 refueling.

[@stanleybuchan4610]

​@@tbolt18Correct.

[@user-qe7rz6jf1m]

Gewerbeschild strahlshausen
Lokieltmanshausen
Baustoffe eschwege

[@narayankulkarni5378]

🛩🛩🛩🛩✈✈✈✈👍👌⚔🇺🇸⚔💪

[@dianeribera7739]

WAOO👏👏💪💪🇺🇸🫶🙋🏻‍♀️💐🙏

[@user-ud4vi5wv1b]

😮😅😊

[@1epton]

垂直着陸のほうが飛行中と接地したときの緊張感のギャップが大きそう。

[@user-si7ii4bj8p]

？？？「垂直離着陸機はイギリスで生まれました日本の発明品じゃありません。我が国のオリジナルです。」

[@woodies2009]

飛行中にトイレ行きたくなったら垂直離着陸でその辺に適当に降りられるからいいよなぁ(パイロットはオムツしてるわというツッコミは厳禁)

[@lotsaluck721]

My farts have more umph