DOE-5: Fractional Factorial Designs, Confounding and Resolution Codes

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 มิ.ย. 2024
  • In this video, Hemant Urdhwareshe explains basic concepts of Fractional Factorial Design, Confounding or Aliasing and Resolution of designs. Hemant is a Fellow of American Society for Quality (ASQ) and is certified by ASQ as Six Sigma Master Black Belt (CMBB), Black Belt (CSSBB), Reliability Engineer (CRE), Quality Engineer (CQE) and Manager of Quality and Organizational Excellence (CMQ/OE). The video would be useful to all those who wish to learn about use of fractional factorial designs to reduce number of runs in experiments. It will be also be greatly useful for preparing ASQ certification exams!

ความคิดเห็น • 68

  • @pogerijo
    @pogerijo 11 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Very clear and direct to the point. Thank you so much!!!

  • @clipeus87
    @clipeus87 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Finally a clear video on fractional factorial design, thanks a lot!

  • @AhmadAli-rm3pi
    @AhmadAli-rm3pi หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    very nice lecture i solute you thank you sir

  • @ankitverma8820
    @ankitverma8820 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Wonderful explanation of confounding. Highly recommended for all.

  • @user-qn6zq2ek1l
    @user-qn6zq2ek1l 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    my goodness, that hand trick might help me remember on my IASSC test! thank you!

    • @instituteofqualityandrelia7902
      @instituteofqualityandrelia7902  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks! Yes, the hands trick is a very easy way to remember the resolution codes and extent of confounding!🙏

    • @user-qn6zq2ek1l
      @user-qn6zq2ek1l 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hey I passed my IASSC test. This video surely helped explain confounding and a simple way to remember!! thanks again! @@instituteofqualityandrelia7902

  • @stephenwright7274
    @stephenwright7274 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for making these videos. Clear and to the point!

  • @User123rag
    @User123rag ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Excellent explanation! One gem of a collection!! Thanks a lot for your efforts.:)

    • @uhemant1
      @uhemant1 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you so much Ragha Laxmi!

  • @calsimeth1588
    @calsimeth1588 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It makes so much more sense to me now! Thank you!

  • @philipaston8956
    @philipaston8956 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for this clear explanation of confounding and aliasing!

  • @parelectricengineeringllc1816
    @parelectricengineeringllc1816 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fantastic video. Great insight and excellent presentation

  • @rohanmore1774
    @rohanmore1774 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Short and succinct !!! Thumbs up !!!

  • @Yun-Sura
    @Yun-Sura ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Bless you for this explanation!

  • @GyanVisharad
    @GyanVisharad 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very information sir..with simple example..Thanks

  • @mdmahmudulhasanmiddya9632
    @mdmahmudulhasanmiddya9632 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Unbelievable explanation.I am enjoying your vedio sir

  • @item6931
    @item6931 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is actually excellent.

  • @rvijayaragunathan
    @rvijayaragunathan 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    superb.... well explanation sir ...

  • @francoisl7663
    @francoisl7663 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Excellent, thank you.

  • @TechAger
    @TechAger 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very nicely explained Sir... Thanks

  • @mdmahmudulhasanmiddya9632
    @mdmahmudulhasanmiddya9632 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very good explain sir

  • @mariaelenacerecedoarroyo5826
    @mariaelenacerecedoarroyo5826 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    great video!! Can you recommend some books in order to study the resolution designs?

    • @instituteofqualityandrelia7902
      @instituteofqualityandrelia7902  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks for your interest! There are many good books. Design of Experiments by Montgomery is excellent reference. George Box's book is very good. My book 'Six Sigma for Business Excellence' is also provides good information on DOE as well as other Six Sigma Tools. If you outside India, you can still buy e-book on Amazon. Good luck!

  • @vedantigandhi8209
    @vedantigandhi8209 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You have explained the concept of confounding very well. Thank you for the nice explanation.
    I just have 1 doubt regarding fractional factorial design. Why did we choose ABC=+1 and not ABC=-1?
    Thanks a lot! :)

    • @instituteofqualityandrelia7902
      @instituteofqualityandrelia7902  3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Thank you Vedanti. ABC=+1 is the principal fraction. In this principal fraction confounding becomes additive, in the sense, effect of A is actually A+BC, for example. ABC=-1 can also be used if desired. In this fraction effect of A is A-BC, for example. One should be aware of this while selecting the fraction.

  • @marcouscangaolea1264
    @marcouscangaolea1264 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks a lot. Pretty useful this video is

  • @andresalbertocorimayhuasil142
    @andresalbertocorimayhuasil142 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent video, it was really helpful. I got a question, what does a 3*2*2 factorial design means? I understood it refers to three factors and each of them with a specific level, i. e., the first factor has three levels, the second one has two levels, and the last one two factors as well. I thought it was a fractional factorial design. However, I tried to do this on STATISTICA and I could not find a design with 12 runs (according to 3*2*2). You would be so kind to help me to understand this. Thank you.

    • @instituteofqualityandrelia7902
      @instituteofqualityandrelia7902  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      This is not a usual convention. Experiments with different factor levels are called General Full Factorial Designs. You need to create a General Full Factorial Design in software as this is not a standard design.

  • @paolo7206
    @paolo7206 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good video

  • @paolo7206
    @paolo7206 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice video

  • @KNR85
    @KNR85 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    "Experimenters have found that higher order interactions tend to be small and can be ignored often"
    Is there any reference book or something that we can use to support this statement for the research projects.

    • @instituteofqualityandrelia7902
      @instituteofqualityandrelia7902  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hello Nirushan kathiresu,
      I am repeating the same answer that I mentioned in your other similar question.
      Basically, the fractional factorisl designs are based on one of the principles known as Sparsity of Effects. According to the sparsity-of-effects principle, it is unlikely that complex, higher-order effects exist, and that the most important effects are the lower-order effects. Thus, assign the experimental units so that main (1st-order) effects and the 2nd-order interaction effects can be investigated. You can get many references for this.

  • @beshr1993
    @beshr1993 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    that actually helped, thank u :)

  • @mdmahmudulhasanmiddya9632
    @mdmahmudulhasanmiddya9632 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you

  • @ljay3280
    @ljay3280 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    How about a situation where you have 2 factors ,one with 7 levels and the other with 6 levels. Full factorial gives 42 runs. How do you run these with fractional factorial with less runs?

    • @instituteofqualityandrelia7902
      @instituteofqualityandrelia7902  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Standard fractional factorial designs are available for two-level designs. In ur case, A has 7 and B has 6 levels. Fractional factorial design is not possible in this case as there are only two factors. If you have more factors with >2 levels, you need computer generated designs. For this you will need clear understanding of the degrees of freedom and your requirements.

  • @dr.akankshasom2309
    @dr.akankshasom2309 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    "Experimenters have found that higher order interactions of three and more factor tend to be small and can be ignored often"How did we reach this conclusion.

    • @instituteofqualityandrelia7902
      @instituteofqualityandrelia7902  3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Thanks for your question!
      Actually this statement is more of assumption based on 'The sparsity of effects principle'. This is more of an assumption that should be based on technical knowledge and judhement and needs to be validated based on analysis of experimental results. If the assumption is not valid, we should find low R-sq values, R-sq-pred values. The experimener is also taking some risk to save time and resources while reducing number of runs in fractional factorials.
      With best wishes..Hemant

  • @asfarnasir
    @asfarnasir 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is the resolutuon of the discussed example?

    • @MrJewZie
      @MrJewZie 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      3 or III

    • @instituteofqualityandrelia7902
      @instituteofqualityandrelia7902  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MrJewZie Thanks for directly answering! Yes, the resolution of the design discussed in the vide is 3 or III as main effects are alliased with two-factor interactions!

    • @instituteofqualityandrelia7902
      @instituteofqualityandrelia7902  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      The resolution of the design discussed in the vide is 3 or III as main effects are alliased with two-factor interactions!

  • @mdmahmudulhasanmiddya9632
    @mdmahmudulhasanmiddya9632 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir what is run?