Why NewsClick Founder was released by Supreme Court II UPSC Prelims 2024 II Pathway to Prelims

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 17

  • @prernasingh383
    @prernasingh383 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very informative 👍🏽

  • @anshrastogi9430
    @anshrastogi9430 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you sirji

  • @dillipkujyoti6007
    @dillipkujyoti6007 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great precise presentation

  • @curious_one1156
    @curious_one1156 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    are there specific laws other than UAPA for punitive detention, which are different from CrPC for actual crimes ? Eg: If it is suspected that someone could have caused a crime (because they have written something which might have motivated someone to commit a crime). UAPA being used everywhere will cause it to lose its currency, and SC may say that extra bail conditions violate article 21 and basic structure.

  • @pulkitsharma6648
    @pulkitsharma6648 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Sir one video on Rejection of Nomination during elections. Thank you; brilliant explanation

  • @shashankshekhar6061
    @shashankshekhar6061 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    thanks sir

  • @BLUEerudite12
    @BLUEerudite12 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    WHY THINGS WERE SO DIFFERENT FOR COMMON MAN ? NUPUR SHARMA ? WHY NEWSCLICK AND ARVIND KEJRIWAL DESPITE BEING WITH EVIDENCES ARE FREED BY SC?

    • @SingingSingh
      @SingingSingh 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Valid point

    • @Karan14215
      @Karan14215 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Achha ji sc andha hai, jo evidence hote hue bhi bail de Raha hai, 😂 thoda to dimag ka istemaal kijiye.

    • @peace331
      @peace331 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Atleast there were no evidences in case of arvind kejriwal..i m not supporting anyone here ....please go and read pmla act if u r upsc aspirant or otherwiseawared citizen...both pmla and uapa are way too stringent

    • @utkarshdubey6882
      @utkarshdubey6882 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      because u are product of brainwash

    • @BLUEerudite12
      @BLUEerudite12 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@peace331 bro i am a upsc aspirant , moreover currently posted in karnataka in kvs. go read the supreme court documents as well the police filed chargesheet. it has been inevitably proved that he took 100 cr as bribe.. 600 cr of blackmoney,, also he is clearly involved with pro khalistani elements.
      uapa and pmla are stringent and they are stringent for everyone. my question here is that why he ? why not hemant soren ? why not nupur sharma ? she only quoted tha hadiths.
      newsclick is infamous fortheir pro china news. if you are aware you should know how china influence countries. why free speech for newsclick ? why not for manish kashyap of bihar????