Fun! One of the difficulties with miniatures is that they usually don't seem to adequately model the effects of mass on materials. My eye can't help but think that a full tanker wouldn't bounce as much, but would have far greater deformity in both the ground, at impact points (especially the farthest fall) and in the tank itself. Buckling is likely at full scale but you would have to model in tinfoil, almost, to get the same ratio of mass to strength in a mini. Even the tires would feel more realistic if they burst upon impact, when the full weight of the tanker falls on them from several stories in height. But again, modelling in fragile rubber is a tough standard to demand. Anyway, it looked really good nonetheless!
@@JoeOvercoat really doesn't matter if there was any fuel in it, the weight of the trailer and vessel would have very likely blown the tires off the wheels and cause significant damage to the structure of the trailer and vessel. that disregards all the other non-damage sustained during the impacts from the fall. doing things with miniatures is cool, but it's just not possible to do a good job replicating realistic results.
Looking at the shot of the car with it's intact roof at the bottom of the ravine my thought was "uhhh no the roof would have been crushed". I'm sure on the day. A second set up would be created with the vehicles showing more realistic destruction.
This is an example of the fantastic job the filmmakers and cameramen were doing in the pre-digital effects era. I’ve watched many movies, and DUEL stands out as one of the most unforgettable thriller with the fewest actors. Back in the day, I thought the truck and car falling off the cliff were real… Thank you for posting this great behind the scenes clip!
I think people underestimate the huge amount of talent that goes on behind the scenes to make a great movie. Its an entire art form in and of itself. I really enjoyed this thank you for posting.
Yup. You seen those "planet earth" documentaries? The behind the scenes is just as good if not better. The way the camera men get all the angles and the work that goes into getting the shots. You should check it out. If you're into that kind of stuff
The tagline of American Society of Cinematographers magazine was (back in the day) was "The real stars are behind the camera". A bit vain but a lot of magic is created in the angles and lighting evoking tons of emotion.
I saw it 3 times when it was released to the cinemas in NZ. Other good action movies involving vehicles include Vanishing Point and Dirty Mary, Crazy Larry.
CGI doesn't necessarily mean bad movies. A CGI movie can be excellent if the right artists are used. Most modern movie developers always hurry through CGI processes making the movies look like cr** The more detail the CGI has the better.
Oh, this shot will ABSOLUTELY have CG. It isn't a bad thing. It is a tool. Jurassic Park uses practical and CG interchangeably and in the same shot all the time. A good director simply uses the tools correctly. Remember how Top Gun Maverik made a big deal of shooting practically? Yeah, it is one of the most CG heavy films ever. They flew real planes... but they were NOT FA-18s. Shots out the window of wingmen... those were just normal planes with tracking markers on wings/tail that then got replaced in post with 100% CG FA-18s. They just used the real plane as lighting reference. Even most of the parts of the actors own plane out the window are CG. Any film claiming no CG or all practical is really saying, we did a really good job of blending all our CG in. Fury Road also has a massive crap ton of CG despite practical filming.
Here is the TRUE Savior HalleluYAH translates “Praise ye YaH” YaH is The Heavenly Father YaH arrives via the TENT OF MEETING YaH was Who they Crucified for our sins YaH was Crucified on an Almond TREE Ancient Semitic of Moshe (Moses) Isa Scroll (The Original Isaiah) Isaiah 42:8 "I am YaH; that is my Name! I will not yield my glory to another or my praise to idols.” Isaiah 43:11 “I am YAH, and there is no other Savior but Me.” Isaiah 45:5 “I am YaH, and there is none else.”
@@MiniaturesFX Me too ! One of Spielberg's greats. He was young and hungry then, and he took JAWS because it has four letters like DUAL and thought it was destiny... He was right.
@@JanHeerenthey meant the tanker it’s self that thinner metal would have torn and distorted spilling it’s contents and since it did say flammable on the side, it would have more than likely ignited creating a huge ball of fire.
This gave me goosebumps. I played with trucks as a kid and whenever I saw a movie having a truck especially a thriller, it instantly became my favorite. One of them being Duel.
💐THE GOSPEL OF THE WORD OF ALMIGHTY GOD "the Salvation of the last day that Christ brought in the second and last incarnation of His new and holy name" (This may be a reminder for most people of God's words from Genesis: "Let us make man in our image, according to our likeness." Suppose God is saying that "let us" make man in "our " picture, then "ours" shows two or more; since He said "ours," then God is not only one. In this way, man begins to think generally of different persons, and from these words came the idea of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. At the time Moses wrote Genesis, it was after the creation of mankind following the creation of the world. In the beginning, when the world, Moses did not exist yet. And it was a long time before Moses wrote the Bible, so how could he possibly know what God said in heaven? He was unaware of how God created the world. What is written in the Old Testament is the work of Jehovah, a phase of the work of God Himself for ushering in the Age of Law. This is the work of God, where as He spoke, it happened, and as He commanded, it remained. When all is said and done, whether it is the Father or the Son, They are one Spirit, not divided into separate persons. When man speaks of separate persons, does it not reflect God? Jehovah is the Spirit, and also a substance of Jesus. Doesn't the Spirit of God simply carry out the work of the Spirit from different perspectives?" Because of this, there is no distinction between persons.) Almighty God said This can be a REMINDER for most PEOPLE of GOD'S WORDS from GENESIS: "Let us make man in our image, after our likeness." Suppose GOD says "we" will CREATE MAN in "our" IMAGE, then "we" SHOWS TWO or MORE; since He SAID "we," then GOD is NOT one. IN THIS WAY, MAN BEGAN TO THINK GENERALLY OF DIFFERENT PERSONS, AND FROM THESE WORDS HAD THE IDEA OF THE FATHER, THE SON, AND THE HOLY SPIRIT. What then does the Father look like? What does the Son look like? And what does the Holy Spirit look like? ☀️🙏 Could it be that the present man was made in the image of the one who was put together from the three? Then is the image of man like that of the Father, the Son, or the Holy Spirit? 🙏 WHICH of the persons of GOD is the image of MAN? This idea of MAN is ABSOLUTELY WRONG and NONSENSE! It can only separate one God from several Gods. 🙏 AT THE TIME Moses WROTE GENESIS, it was AFTER MANKIND WAS CREATED AFTER THE CREATION OF THE WORLD. In the BEGINNING, when the WORLD began, Moses did NOT exist. And IT TOOK A LONG TIME FOR MOSES TO WRITE THE BIBLE, so HOW could he possibly KNOW WHAT GOD SAID in HEAVEN?🙏☀️ He is UNCONSCIOUS of HOW GOD CREATED THE WORLD. 🙏 In the OLD TESTAMENT of the Bible, there is NO mention of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, only the TRUE GOD, JEHOVAH, is PERFORMING His WORK in ISRAEL. ☀️ He is CALLED by different NAMES in the CHANGING TIMES, but this DOESN'T PROVE that each NAME REFERES to a different PERSON. Therefore, then wouldn't there be countless persons of God? What is WRITTEN in the OLD TESTAMENT is the WORK of JEHOVAH, A PHASE of the WORK of GOD HIMSELF for the START of the Age of Law. This is GOD'S WORK, where ACCORDING to what He SPOKE, it happened, and ACCORDING to what He commanded, it REMAINS. 🙏💐 AT NO TIME DID JEHOVAH SAY HE WAS THE FATHER WHO WOULD COME TO EFFECT THE WORK, or did He even foretell the coming of the Son to redeem mankind. WHEN IT CAME TO THE TIME OF JESUS, it was only mentioned that GOD became MAN to REDEEM ALL MANKIND, NOT that the SON CAME. ☀️ Because the times are not the same and the work that God Himself carries out is also different, He has to carry out His work within different kingdoms. In this way, the identity He represents is also different. PEOPLE BELIEVE JEHOVAH IS THE FATHER OF JESUS, but JESUS DOESN'T REALLY ACKNOWLEDGE, saying: "We were never identified as Father and Son; I and the Father in heaven are one. The Father is in Me and I am in the Father; when men see the Son, they see the Father in heaven." ☀️😪 When all is said and done, whether it is the Father or the Son, They are one Spirit, not divided into separate persons. By the time man attempts to explain, matters are complicated by the idea of different persons, as well as the relationship between Father, Son, and Spirit. WHEN MAN TALKS ABOUT separate persons, does it not reflect GOD? 🙏🔅 Man even ranks persons as first, second, and third; these are all mere human understandings, unworthy of reference, and utterly unreal! If you ask him: "How many are there in God?" He will say that God is the Trinity of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit: the one true God. If you ask him: "Who is the Father?" He will say: The Father is the Spirit of God in heaven; He rules over all, and He is the Lord of heaven." "Then is Jehovah the Spirit?" ☀️ He will say: "Yes!" If you ask him afterwards, "Who is the Son?" He will say that Jesus is the Son, anyway: "Then what is the story of Jesus? From whom did He come?" He will say: "Jesus was born of Mary through the shadowing of the Holy Spirit. " ☀️ "Then is not His substance also Spirit? Does His work also represent the Holy Spirit? Jehovah is the Spirit, and also a substance of Jesus. Now in the last days, it goes without saying that the Spirit still works; how did He become different persons? Doesn't the Spirit of God just carry out the work of the Spirit from different perspectives? Because of this, there is no difference between personas. 🙏 From "Is There a Trinity?" Fulfilled in "In the beginning He was the Word, the Word was with God, and the Word was God" (John 1:1). (Ezekiel 2:9-10). (Rev. 19:9,13) 📩 All who have "ears to listen" are led to what the Spirit of God is saying in His lowered and built kingdom/Church engraved with His new name, His totality, the ownership of this disposition, "THE CHURCH OF ALMIGHTY GOD "💐 fulfillment from what was said He to Peter 2,000 years ago recorded in (Matthew 16:18-19). His Coming is the fulfillment of all that was prophesied in the great book of Revelation, so the last "Salvation" He brought the whole truth, the way for eternal life. So the "victorious" ones who will receive them are the wise "virgins" because as recorded in the prophecy of His return no one knows it except the one who will receive it! So "come" and come to His kingdom/church standing in the holy place in the air/TH-cam! This is also a fulfillment from the book of (Isaiah 2:2/9:6) which He first fulfilled in His first incarnation. 📥 "They say with a loud voice, "Salvation comes from the Lamb, and from our God who sits on the Throne!" (Rev. 7:10). ... and (Isaiah 2: 2 / 9:6) "On the Last Day, the mountain on which Jehovah's temple stands will stand out above all the mountains. All nations will flock there. " . "For a baby boy is born to us. The rule will be given to him; and he shall be called Wonderful Counselor, Almighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace." 💌
Im 70 now, loved the movie and it's spooky plot. Don't need special effect when you enjoy the alternate game they play. So cool seeing how you folks did this. Ty.
Modern CGI looks way better than miniatures. The problem is that if the CGI is perfectly realistic, nobody notices that it's CGI. The viewer only notices CGI when it has been done badly. Take Top Gun Maverick, for example: more than 90% of the airplanes are CGI. Even the shots filmed inside the cockpits are CGI, except for the faces. And yet nobody noticed. (They actually used real planes to shoot the movie, but the shots were only there to get the correct exposure and the planes were later replaced with CGI planes.) Even though more than half of the shots in this movie contain CGI, a lot of people who don't know anything about the production of modern movies have said that they like the fact that the movie has so little CGI. If you don't believe me that CGI is now perfectly realistic, just take a look at the series "No CGI is just invisible CGI" on TH-cam.
Fantastic work guys. Don’t listen to the negative people. They didn’t do anything better with their day ! Their idea of creativity is to pull other peoples achievements down. It’s easier than actually doing something. Great work. 👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼
One of my favourite movies ever . I can’t believe tho , I watched it so many times before I spotted the camera man in the back seat of the car a few times throughout the movie .
That was actually Spielberg you saw in the backseat. If you watch the interview about how they made the movie with Spielberg, he admits it. You can also see his reflection in the glass of the phonebooth when Dennis Weaver enters it. (it happens quick but he's there!) Spielberg reveals a number of interesting facts about that movie in the interview. Well worth a watch!
I never heard of that one , i`ll have to sus it out thank you mate , i have had several truckys in the family ( or did have .... RIP ) , i was a trucky myself and always enjoy a good trucky flick ;) . Cheers .
There are telltale signs in the undercarriages, tires and suspension. I am impressed they got the toy wheels to jiggle realistically as they hit bottom.
For all those commenting about the truck not exploding. You have to remember that in the original film, a full scale truck (emptied of fuel) and a car was used for the ending. These guys are demonstrating how the same effect can be achieved by using models to suit a film's budget. The only difference is, the flames in the car would of been CGI - I'm sure most of us are familiar with 70s disaster movies that models with water/fire dont mix, due to the different scales.
@@PANZERFAUST90 yep, it's true. The original movie filmed actual Vehicles going over the edge. Saw a TH-cam video not too long ago about a man who found that site, and the truck is still at the bottom of that hill.
My father and I watched this on TV when I was about 11 or 12 because we both liked Dennis Weaver. I had no idea Spielberg directed it. I remember being absolutely terrified because I could see how a situation like this could realistically happen. Great movie!
I have to admit that I thought this was the "behind the scenes" shoot for this scene. It has been a long time since I saw the real movie. The slow-motion sequence made it realistic. But then, I saw the movie version, and a real truck and car were used. The REAL vehicles buckled, bent, and deformed much more. The key thing that gave it away was the heavy exhaust smoke in the REAL scene. That was a great setup you did. The movie, for its time, was outstanding. The same for jaws. Now that Steve has the money and backing, it really shows how great he can make a move look. Saving Private Ryan and Band of Brothers were superb.
@@PANZERFAUST90 ce n'est, selon moi, certes pas son film le plus spectaculaire et le plus populaire mais c'est le seul de ses films dans lequel j'ai éprouvé un réel sentiment d'étrangeté, de surnaturel, sans effet technique. C'est ce qui m'attire réellement dans un film "fantastique", le sentiment d'étrangeté. Ce simple camion qui harcèle une voiture est une idée géniale. Ce sentiment d'étrangeté, j'ai pu le retrouver par exemple dans "les oiseaux" d'Hitchcock quand l'héroïne se fait attaquer par une mouette dans sa barque, il n'y a aucune musique, rien de dramatique, uniquement cette simple attaque improbable et cela provoque chez le spectateur un fort sentiment de bizarrerie. Bonne journée à vous 😊
@@0patience4flz There will come a time when CGI does not look fake, and movie directors know how to use it without making it look fake. Probably long after anyone alive today is dead but they’ll get there someday. Er…maybe.
Modern CGI looks perfectly realistic. The problem is that if the CGI is perfectly realistic, nobody notices that it's CGI. The viewer only notices CGI when it has been done badly. Take Top Gun Maverick, for example: more than 90% of the airplanes are CGI. Even the shots filmed inside the cockpits are CGI, except for the faces. And yet nobody noticed. (They actually used real planes to shoot the movie, but the shots were only there to get the correct exposure and the planes were later replaced with CGI planes.) Even though more than half of the shots in this movie contain CGI, a lot of people who don't know anything about the production of modern movies have said that they like the fact that the movie has so little CGI. If you don't believe me that CGI is now perfectly realistic, just take a look at the series "No CGI is just invisible CGI" on TH-cam.
@@Li-Nuss A combination of real shots and CGI is ideal. I have always believed in that. And the new AI-technology uses the same principle. It base the result on real shots. But the problem is so many movies relies only on CGI. The first Jurassic Park for example looks more realistic than the newer movies with only CGI.
totally unrealistic because the tanker trailer would fold up on impact like an accordion at real life scale. It wouldn't simply bounce off the slope essentially unharmed like shown here. And the flames in the trunk are too big in proportion to the car itself for them to look real.
If this is behind the scenes on a 1971 film, how is it shot in HD quality, and these guys are all dressed in clothing that reflect mid 2000s?? Also how do you explain the modern cars in the background @0:11? Was there a remake of the film? I’m confused. Seriously.
When it was filmed in 1971 the quality was even better than HD because it was fimed on pellicule film. I think only a RED or Arri camera's can compete with pellicule film.
A lot of reactions in this video really surprised me. People who think they are pros because they noticed “the truck doesn’t deform” (hint: even children know miniatures don’t deform, noticing it doesn’t make you a pro), yet they believe the 3D tools they use are super real (but they ignore the physics in those tools are inaccurate approximations of professional FEM/FEA packages). They probably don’t know what the battle of Hoth is, nor how it was filmed. They probably never heard of Harryhausen, and if they saw any of his scenes, they will say that’s a joke and they can do it better. In other words, they have no idea what FX is, they think the secret is the tool and not the person. Said this, kudos to the people who made this remake. Very well done. Even wheels vibrate at impact (I thought for a moment you were tricking using footage from the original movie), and even some parts detach. I also appreciate that shot in which you show the pin that connects the tank with the truck, it’s like you are saying “hey look, we used models”. Very well done, guys.
That was amazing especially considering this was all before CGI. The new generation does not even know enough to recognize how jaded they appear in not giving credit where credit is obliviously due. That truck in that movie scared the ever living crap out of me...to this day.
Love all the effects in the old school films , yeah they weren't perfect but they had soul , real art . Any young film fan should check out 'Alien' 1979 or 'The Thing' 1982.Incredible effects work . Great clips guys , Dual was a great flick.
💐THE GOSPEL OF THE WORD OF ALMIGHTY GOD "the Salvation of the last day that Christ brought in the second and last incarnation of His new and holy name" (This may be a reminder for most people of God's words from Genesis: "Let us make man in our image, according to our likeness." Suppose God is saying that "let us" make man in "our " picture, then "ours" shows two or more; since He said "ours," then God is not only one. In this way, man begins to think generally of different persons, and from these words came the idea of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. At the time Moses wrote Genesis, it was after the creation of mankind following the creation of the world. In the beginning, when the world, Moses did not exist yet. And it was a long time before Moses wrote the Bible, so how could he possibly know what God said in heaven? He was unaware of how God created the world. What is written in the Old Testament is the work of Jehovah, a phase of the work of God Himself for ushering in the Age of Law. This is the work of God, where as He spoke, it happened, and as He commanded, it remained. When all is said and done, whether it is the Father or the Son, They are one Spirit, not divided into separate persons. When man speaks of separate persons, does it not reflect God? Jehovah is the Spirit, and also a substance of Jesus. Doesn't the Spirit of God simply carry out the work of the Spirit from different perspectives?" Because of this, there is no distinction between persons.) Almighty God said This can be a REMINDER for most PEOPLE of GOD'S WORDS from GENESIS: "Let us make man in our image, after our likeness." Suppose GOD says "we" will CREATE MAN in "our" IMAGE, then "we" SHOWS TWO or MORE; since He SAID "we," then GOD is NOT one. IN THIS WAY, MAN BEGAN TO THINK GENERALLY OF DIFFERENT PERSONS, AND FROM THESE WORDS HAD THE IDEA OF THE FATHER, THE SON, AND THE HOLY SPIRIT. What then does the Father look like? What does the Son look like? And what does the Holy Spirit look like? ☀️🙏 Could it be that the present man was made in the image of the one who was put together from the three? Then is the image of man like that of the Father, the Son, or the Holy Spirit? 🙏 WHICH of the persons of GOD is the image of MAN? This idea of MAN is ABSOLUTELY WRONG and NONSENSE! It can only separate one God from several Gods. 🙏 AT THE TIME Moses WROTE GENESIS, it was AFTER MANKIND WAS CREATED AFTER THE CREATION OF THE WORLD. In the BEGINNING, when the WORLD began, Moses did NOT exist. And IT TOOK A LONG TIME FOR MOSES TO WRITE THE BIBLE, so HOW could he possibly KNOW WHAT GOD SAID in HEAVEN?🙏☀️ He is UNCONSCIOUS of HOW GOD CREATED THE WORLD. 🙏 In the OLD TESTAMENT of the Bible, there is NO mention of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, only the TRUE GOD, JEHOVAH, is PERFORMING His WORK in ISRAEL. ☀️ He is CALLED by different NAMES in the CHANGING TIMES, but this DOESN'T PROVE that each NAME REFERES to a different PERSON. Therefore, then wouldn't there be countless persons of God? What is WRITTEN in the OLD TESTAMENT is the WORK of JEHOVAH, A PHASE of the WORK of GOD HIMSELF for the START of the Age of Law. This is GOD'S WORK, where ACCORDING to what He SPOKE, it happened, and ACCORDING to what He commanded, it REMAINS. 🙏💐 AT NO TIME DID JEHOVAH SAY HE WAS THE FATHER WHO WOULD COME TO EFFECT THE WORK, or did He even foretell the coming of the Son to redeem mankind. WHEN IT CAME TO THE TIME OF JESUS, it was only mentioned that GOD became MAN to REDEEM ALL MANKIND, NOT that the SON CAME. ☀️ Because the times are not the same and the work that God Himself carries out is also different, He has to carry out His work within different kingdoms. In this way, the identity He represents is also different. PEOPLE BELIEVE JEHOVAH IS THE FATHER OF JESUS, but JESUS DOESN'T REALLY ACKNOWLEDGE, saying: "We were never identified as Father and Son; I and the Father in heaven are one. The Father is in Me and I am in the Father; when men see the Son, they see the Father in heaven." ☀️😪 When all is said and done, whether it is the Father or the Son, They are one Spirit, not divided into separate persons. By the time man attempts to explain, matters are complicated by the idea of different persons, as well as the relationship between Father, Son, and Spirit. WHEN MAN TALKS ABOUT separate persons, does it not reflect GOD? 🙏🔅 Man even ranks persons as first, second, and third; these are all mere human understandings, unworthy of reference, and utterly unreal! If you ask him: "How many are there in God?" He will say that God is the Trinity of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit: the one true God. If you ask him: "Who is the Father?" He will say: The Father is the Spirit of God in heaven; He rules over all, and He is the Lord of heaven." "Then is Jehovah the Spirit?" ☀️ He will say: "Yes!" If you ask him afterwards, "Who is the Son?" He will say that Jesus is the Son, anyway: "Then what is the story of Jesus? From whom did He come?" He will say: "Jesus was born of Mary through the shadowing of the Holy Spirit. " ☀️ "Then is not His substance also Spirit? Does His work also represent the Holy Spirit? Jehovah is the Spirit, and also a substance of Jesus. Now in the last days, it goes without saying that the Spirit still works; how did He become different persons? Doesn't the Spirit of God just carry out the work of the Spirit from different perspectives? Because of this, there is no difference between personas. 🙏 From "Is There a Trinity?" Fulfilled in "In the beginning He was the Word, the Word was with God, and the Word was God" (John 1:1). (Ezekiel 2:9-10). (Rev. 19:9,13) 📩 All who have "ears to listen" are led to what the Spirit of God is saying in His lowered and built kingdom/Church engraved with His new name, His totality, the ownership of this disposition, "THE CHURCH OF ALMIGHTY GOD "💐 fulfillment from what was said He to Peter 2,000 years ago recorded in (Matthew 16:18-19). His Coming is the fulfillment of all that was prophesied in the great book of Revelation, so the last "Salvation" He brought the whole truth, the way for eternal life. So the "victorious" ones who will receive them are the wise "virgins" because as recorded in the prophecy of His return no one knows it except the one who will receive it! So "come" and come to His kingdom/church standing in the holy place in the air/TH-cam! This is also a fulfillment from the book of (Isaiah 2:2/9:6) which He first fulfilled in His first incarnation. 📥 "They say with a loud voice, "Salvation comes from the Lamb, and from our God who sits on the Throne!" (Rev. 7:10). ... and (Isaiah 2: 2 / 9:6) "On the Last Day, the mountain on which Jehovah's temple stands will stand out above all the mountains. All nations will flock there. " . "For a baby boy is born to us. The rule will be given to him; and he shall be called Wonderful Counselor, Almighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace." 💌
We must understand that real metal does deform and bend, but the common eye watching this scene would not notice it. It is realistic enough to emulate a real crash. Movie making is magic with science.
Brilliant! Love to see how things are done. There are those who say it "spoils the magic" but I disagree. You can still be very involved in the story while deeply appreciating the immense skill, attention to detail and the imagination that goes into making it. Just as you can appreciate the skill of an actor while still being involved in the story they are telling.
This scene looks so real with great sound effect and meticulous editing. Practical effects are the best. I am so tired to see CGI in superheroes flick.
Fun!
One of the difficulties with miniatures is that they usually don't seem to adequately model the effects of mass on materials. My eye can't help but think that a full tanker wouldn't bounce as much, but would have far greater deformity in both the ground, at impact points (especially the farthest fall) and in the tank itself. Buckling is likely at full scale but you would have to model in tinfoil, almost, to get the same ratio of mass to strength in a mini. Even the tires would feel more realistic if they burst upon impact, when the full weight of the tanker falls on them from several stories in height. But again, modelling in fragile rubber is a tough standard to demand.
Anyway, it looked really good nonetheless!
Was it established in the film that the tanker was full?
I suggest that there’s no reason for us to think that the tanker has any fuel in it.
@@JoeOvercoat really doesn't matter if there was any fuel in it, the weight of the trailer and vessel would have very likely blown the tires off the wheels and cause significant damage to the structure of the trailer and vessel.
that disregards all the other non-damage sustained during the impacts from the fall. doing things with miniatures is cool, but it's just not possible to do a good job replicating realistic results.
Looking at the shot of the car with it's intact roof at the bottom of the ravine my thought was "uhhh no the roof would have been crushed". I'm sure on the day. A second set up would be created with the vehicles showing more realistic destruction.
If it had fuel in it, you could be assured of a massive explosion.
This is an example of the fantastic job the filmmakers and cameramen were doing in the pre-digital effects era. I’ve watched many movies, and DUEL stands out as one of the most unforgettable thriller with the fewest actors. Back in the day, I thought the truck and car falling off the cliff were real…
Thank you for posting this great behind the scenes clip!
Its not the resl behind the scenes clip. This is a remake with minatures. In real life it was an actusl truck crash.
@@BOB_HOPE859 You’re absolutely right. It has been confirmed multiple times that the car and the truck were, in fact, sent off a cliff.
@@BOB_HOPE859 The video title is a clickbait to make people think is the real behind the scenes.
Me too!😮😮😮
Great movie, but this looks like it was staged 40 years after the fact.
It seems like the people behind the scenes deserve a separate Award for their creativity & talent ❤🎉
Oh thank you very much 🙏🙏🙏
I'm pretty sure they have Oscar categories for that.
@@kdh3706
Àn Oscar seem insufficient...in my humble opinion.
Like for visual effects, sound editing , cinematography. Maybe some day
for a 1971 movie these behind the scenes surely looks crisp af
This is 100 percent how I used to envision scenes playing with my toys back in the day.😅
Was trying to find this comment
Ahahaha me toooo
Yeah, that’s what I was thinking. It must be lots of fun for big boys😅😅
I told my girl that should look like a toy when we watch that movie she thought I was like an idiot.
would*
not "used to" 😂
@@PANZERFAUST90 You’re wrong. The sentence is grammatically and noematically correct.
The power of the live action and the camera angles are excellent!
Yes ! Don’t forget that Spielberg used 7 cameras for his movie, but he kept only one…. I would really like to see these lost footage !
I think people underestimate the huge amount of talent that goes on behind the scenes to make a great movie.
Its an entire art form in and of itself.
I really enjoyed this thank you for posting.
Thanks 😇
Agree. Be even more realistic if tanker was made out of thick aluminum foil. Still amazing, watched when film came out.
agreed....should definitely be an Oscar for sfx....genius it's that simple..
Working behind the camera is such an underappreciated art.
Yup. You seen those "planet earth" documentaries? The behind the scenes is just as good if not better. The way the camera men get all the angles and the work that goes into getting the shots. You should check it out. If you're into that kind of stuff
@@dewmontain123 most certainly am! I'm a big Attenborough fanatic
The tagline of American Society of Cinematographers magazine was (back in the day) was "The real stars are behind the camera". A bit vain but a lot of magic is created in the angles and lighting evoking tons of emotion.
Theres a lot of super rich directors, not underappreciated
I think building the miniatures, set, and practical effects is harder than pushing a button
Duel a great classic film that keeps you on the edge of your seat. Awesome job 👏 Mr. Spielberg 😊!!!!
Glad you enjoyed it 😇🙏
One of my favourite films
I saw it 3 times when it was released to the cinemas in NZ. Other good action movies involving vehicles include Vanishing Point and Dirty Mary, Crazy Larry.
Thats really great example of practical effects. No CGI.
My favorites movies don’t have CGI, or very little !
CGI doesn't necessarily mean bad movies. A CGI movie can be excellent if the right artists are used.
Most modern movie developers always hurry through CGI processes making the movies look like cr**
The more detail the CGI has the better.
Oh, this shot will ABSOLUTELY have CG. It isn't a bad thing. It is a tool. Jurassic Park uses practical and CG interchangeably and in the same shot all the time. A good director simply uses the tools correctly. Remember how Top Gun Maverik made a big deal of shooting practically? Yeah, it is one of the most CG heavy films ever. They flew real planes... but they were NOT FA-18s. Shots out the window of wingmen... those were just normal planes with tracking markers on wings/tail that then got replaced in post with 100% CG FA-18s. They just used the real plane as lighting reference. Even most of the parts of the actors own plane out the window are CG. Any film claiming no CG or all practical is really saying, we did a really good job of blending all our CG in. Fury Road also has a massive crap ton of CG despite practical filming.
And no dents
Here is the TRUE Savior
HalleluYAH translates “Praise ye YaH”
YaH is The Heavenly Father
YaH arrives via the TENT OF MEETING
YaH was Who they Crucified for our sins
YaH was Crucified on an Almond TREE
Ancient Semitic of Moshe (Moses)
Isa Scroll (The Original Isaiah)
Isaiah 42:8
"I am YaH; that is my Name! I will not yield my glory to another or my praise to idols.”
Isaiah 43:11
“I am YAH, and there is no other Savior but Me.”
Isaiah 45:5
“I am YaH, and there is none else.”
Looks fantastic. One of the qualities that made the original scene so effective is the copious amount of dust shrouding the crash and sound effects.
Thanks ! Did you hear the lion “roar” I added, like in the movie? 😇
Incredible how it all looked so real. It's the movie that you can't turn off when you come across it. Great job by Dennis Weaver as well.
Thanks ! I could watch the movie thousands times !
@@MiniaturesFX Me too ! One of Spielberg's greats. He was young and hungry then, and he took JAWS because it has four letters like DUAL and thought it was destiny... He was right.
Incredible how you can't spell "Incredible".
@@ghostman5620 lol. You're correct.
interesting but the truck does not deform while falling
It’s funny how your brain naturally judges how massive things are and ya i was thinking the same thing.
Are you sure? 🤔
@@JanHeerenthey meant the tanker it’s self that thinner metal would have torn and distorted spilling it’s contents and since it did say flammable on the side, it would have more than likely ignited creating a huge ball of fire.
I was going to say the same thing.
I remember watching a movie from the 1970’s with this exact same car and truck going if the cliff.
Bingo! At least 1 observant person seeing through the Hollywood veil.
This gave me goosebumps. I played with trucks as a kid and whenever I saw a movie having a truck especially a thriller, it instantly became my favorite. One of them being Duel.
I saw this movie when I was young too, one of my favorite film !
💐THE GOSPEL OF THE WORD OF ALMIGHTY GOD "the Salvation of the last day that Christ brought in the second and last incarnation of His new and holy name"
(This may be a reminder for most people of God's words from Genesis: "Let us make man in our image, according to our likeness." Suppose God is saying that "let us" make man in "our " picture, then "ours" shows two or more; since He said "ours," then God is not only one. In this way, man begins to think generally of different persons, and from these words came the idea of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. At the time Moses wrote Genesis, it was after the creation of mankind following the creation of the world. In the beginning, when the world, Moses did not exist yet. And it was a long time before Moses wrote the Bible, so how could he possibly know what God said in heaven? He was unaware of how God created the world. What is written in the Old Testament is the work of Jehovah, a phase of the work of God Himself for ushering in the Age of Law. This is the work of God, where as He spoke, it happened, and as He commanded, it remained. When all is said and done, whether it is the Father or the Son, They are one Spirit, not divided into separate persons. When man speaks of separate persons, does it not reflect God? Jehovah is the Spirit, and also a substance of Jesus. Doesn't the Spirit of God simply carry out the work of the Spirit from different perspectives?" Because of this, there is no distinction between persons.)
Almighty God said
This can be a REMINDER for most PEOPLE of GOD'S WORDS from GENESIS: "Let us make man in our image, after our likeness." Suppose GOD says "we" will CREATE MAN in "our" IMAGE, then "we" SHOWS TWO or MORE; since He SAID "we," then GOD is NOT one. IN THIS WAY, MAN BEGAN TO THINK GENERALLY OF DIFFERENT PERSONS, AND FROM THESE WORDS HAD THE IDEA OF THE FATHER, THE SON, AND THE HOLY SPIRIT. What then does the Father look like? What does the Son look like? And what does the Holy Spirit look like? ☀️🙏
Could it be that the present man was made in the image of the one who was put together from the three? Then is the image of man like that of the Father, the Son, or the Holy Spirit? 🙏
WHICH of the persons of GOD is the image of MAN? This idea of MAN is ABSOLUTELY WRONG and NONSENSE! It can only separate one God from several Gods. 🙏
AT THE TIME Moses WROTE GENESIS, it was AFTER MANKIND WAS CREATED AFTER THE CREATION OF THE WORLD. In the BEGINNING, when the WORLD began, Moses did NOT exist. And IT TOOK A LONG TIME FOR MOSES TO WRITE THE BIBLE, so HOW could he possibly KNOW WHAT GOD SAID in HEAVEN?🙏☀️
He is UNCONSCIOUS of HOW GOD CREATED THE WORLD. 🙏
In the OLD TESTAMENT of the Bible, there is NO mention of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, only the TRUE GOD, JEHOVAH, is PERFORMING His WORK in ISRAEL. ☀️
He is CALLED by different NAMES in the CHANGING TIMES, but this DOESN'T PROVE that each NAME REFERES to a different PERSON. Therefore, then wouldn't there be countless persons of God? What is WRITTEN in the OLD TESTAMENT is the WORK of JEHOVAH, A PHASE of the WORK of GOD HIMSELF for the START of the Age of Law. This is GOD'S WORK, where ACCORDING to what He SPOKE, it happened, and ACCORDING to what He commanded, it REMAINS. 🙏💐
AT NO TIME DID JEHOVAH SAY HE WAS THE FATHER WHO WOULD COME TO EFFECT THE WORK, or did He even foretell the coming of the Son to redeem mankind. WHEN IT CAME TO THE TIME OF JESUS, it was only mentioned that GOD became MAN to REDEEM ALL MANKIND, NOT that the SON CAME. ☀️
Because the times are not the same and the work that God Himself carries out is also different, He has to carry out His work within different kingdoms. In this way, the identity He represents is also different. PEOPLE BELIEVE JEHOVAH IS THE FATHER OF JESUS, but JESUS DOESN'T REALLY ACKNOWLEDGE, saying: "We were never identified as Father and Son; I and the Father in heaven are one. The Father is in Me and I am in the Father; when men see the Son, they see the Father in heaven." ☀️😪
When all is said and done, whether it is the Father or the Son, They are one Spirit, not divided into separate persons. By the time man attempts to explain, matters are complicated by the idea of different persons, as well as the relationship between Father, Son, and Spirit. WHEN MAN TALKS ABOUT separate persons, does it not reflect GOD? 🙏🔅
Man even ranks persons as first, second, and third; these are all mere human understandings, unworthy of reference, and utterly unreal! If you ask him: "How many are there in God?" He will say that God is the Trinity of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit: the one true God. If you ask him: "Who is the Father?" He will say: The Father is the Spirit of God in heaven; He rules over all, and He is the Lord of heaven." "Then is Jehovah the Spirit?" ☀️
He will say: "Yes!" If you ask him afterwards, "Who is the Son?" He will say that Jesus is the Son, anyway: "Then what is the story of Jesus? From whom did He come?" He will say: "Jesus was born of Mary through the shadowing of the Holy Spirit. " ☀️
"Then is not His substance also Spirit? Does His work also represent the Holy Spirit?
Jehovah is the Spirit, and also a substance of Jesus. Now in the last days, it goes without saying that the Spirit still works; how did He become different persons? Doesn't the Spirit of God just carry out the work of the Spirit from different perspectives? Because of this, there is no difference between personas. 🙏
From "Is There a Trinity?"
Fulfilled in "In the beginning He was the Word, the Word was with God, and the Word was God" (John 1:1). (Ezekiel 2:9-10). (Rev. 19:9,13)
📩 All who have "ears to listen" are led to what the Spirit of God is saying in His lowered and built kingdom/Church engraved with His new name, His totality, the ownership of this disposition, "THE CHURCH OF ALMIGHTY GOD "💐 fulfillment from what was said He to Peter 2,000 years ago recorded in (Matthew 16:18-19). His Coming is the fulfillment of all that was prophesied in the great book of Revelation, so the last "Salvation" He brought the whole truth, the way for eternal life. So the "victorious" ones who will receive them are the wise "virgins" because as recorded in the prophecy of His return no one knows it except the one who will receive it! So "come" and come to His kingdom/church standing in the holy place in the air/TH-cam! This is also a fulfillment from the book of (Isaiah 2:2/9:6) which He first fulfilled in His first incarnation. 📥
"They say with a loud voice, "Salvation comes from the Lamb, and from our God who sits on the Throne!" (Rev. 7:10). ... and (Isaiah 2: 2 / 9:6) "On the Last Day, the mountain on which Jehovah's temple stands will stand out above all the mountains. All nations will flock there. " . "For a baby boy is born to us. The rule will be given to him; and he shall be called Wonderful Counselor, Almighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace." 💌
Wonderful miniature work. I'm always happy to see people keeping this artform alive.
Thanks, just an entertainment for us but I still love them in movies :)
@@MiniaturesFX
Cheers.
Isn't this technique still used in movies?
@@pimcramer2569
Not as often as it should be, sadly.
@@MiniaturesFX You guys rock , true talent in your craft 🙏👍.
Great work guys!
🙏
Stunning what film and slow motion can accomplish, and professionals.
if that is stunning, i imagine you just got rid of your black & white tv
I remember watching the movie on TV when it came out. It's still a great ending to a great movie.
I saw this movie, acting Dennis Weaver in 1973. Really unforgettable.
Me too.
Great movie
Nice video
Me too!
Starring*
Duel is a great movie. Now I need to go watch it again. Thanks all involved in this little tidbit of info!
Looks great! Has that 80s/90s vibe 😄
This movie came out in 1970 starring Dennis Weaver and i think this was Spielburgs first movie
Mr Spielberg deserves no credit for this, it goes to the artists who created it. That said. Immaculate execution and incredible precision!
The power of the live action and the camera angles are excellent
I was really impressed when the 'raw' footage was played at full speed but when I saw the final product I was blown away. Fantastic job.
🙏🙏
It's amazing. Same cuts, same actors movements... love it!!!
Im 70 now, loved the movie and it's spooky plot. Don't need special effect when you enjoy the alternate game they play. So cool seeing how you folks did this. Ty.
Bloody brilliant! In real time it looks like kids chucking their toys down the stairs. Slowed down, it looks stunning. Well done to all!!
Thanks 🙏 🙏 20x slow motion (480 fps) was required to achieve this effect !
That film was awesome!!
Surprising ending and so satisfying
This changes my perspective on how movies are made.
So much skill and professionalism on display here. No need for CGI at all. Outstanding
Thanks 🙏🙏🙏
Modern CGI looks way better than miniatures. The problem is that if the CGI is perfectly realistic, nobody notices that it's CGI. The viewer only notices CGI when it has been done badly. Take Top Gun Maverick, for example: more than 90% of the airplanes are CGI. Even the shots filmed inside the cockpits are CGI, except for the faces. And yet nobody noticed. (They actually used real planes to shoot the movie, but the shots were only there to get the correct exposure and the planes were later replaced with CGI planes.) Even though more than half of the shots in this movie contain CGI, a lot of people who don't know anything about the production of modern movies have said that they like the fact that the movie has so little CGI. If you don't believe me that CGI is now perfectly realistic, just take a look at the series "No CGI is just invisible CGI" on TH-cam.
Fantastic work guys. Don’t listen to the negative people. They didn’t do anything better with their day ! Their idea of creativity is to pull other peoples achievements down. It’s easier than actually doing something. Great work. 👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼
Thanks you so much 🙏😇
Fantastic work. Those mini parts looked absolutely real in size.
Big thanks
Duel is a fantastic film!
Sure !
It tells a story with almost no dialogue.
This is what my brother Charles Beaver has been doing for over 35 years for the Hollywood studios. So proud of him!!!
It looks much better than CGI. And the most important thing is that the footage was actually shot.
That's marvelous.
I can't even believe how good that looked! Incredible talent to pull that off so well!
Thank you! Cheers!
Vous êtes très fort, bravo !
Un vrai régal à regarder !
Merci :) Le prochain sera un train....
Greatest movie ever. I'm glad I found this. Well done.
One of my favourite movies ever . I can’t believe tho , I watched it so many times before I spotted the camera man in the back seat of the car a few times throughout the movie .
That was actually Spielberg you saw in the backseat.
If you watch the interview about how they made the movie with Spielberg, he admits it.
You can also see his reflection in the glass of the phonebooth when Dennis Weaver enters it. (it happens quick but he's there!)
Spielberg reveals a number of interesting facts about that movie in the interview. Well worth a watch!
That's because The film was originally intended to be formated 4:3 for television, so that would not have been seen.
Spielberg's reflection in the phonebooth !
I was waiting for someone to walk out of it at the end. Just amazing!!
Same when I saw the movie for the first time !
Surprisingly good film. And one of his very next ones, The Sugarland Express, was also little known, but FANTASTIC!
I never heard of that one , i`ll have to sus it out thank you mate , i have had several truckys in the family ( or did have .... RIP ) , i was a trucky myself and always enjoy a good trucky flick ;) .
Cheers .
Why is it surprising?
Great job. I remember watching this movie, i thought it was a full sized truck and car that went over the cliff.👍🏽
Amazing! Wish i had a production to hire you guys! This work is fantastic!
With pleasure ;)
The work is outstanding !
What's more amazing is that the brain is somehow still able to tell that those are models ...
There are telltale signs in the undercarriages, tires and suspension.
I am impressed they got the toy wheels to jiggle realistically as they hit bottom.
The original movie used the actual 18-wheeler and destroyed it.
Really well done!!!
Thanks a lot! If you like the trains I made video with a head on crash on a bridge ! Check on my channel 😇
excellent work, loved the movie
That was fantastic to see! 👍
That 281 and trailer model are spot on 😍
Thank you very much! 3D print :)
That was so cool, The magic of the silver screen. Great movie. Well done.
Powerful, powerful, powerful!!!
Wonderful how it all came together! Professional looking ending and with all miniatures!
😄👍💯❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
Thanks for these words 😇🙏
That looked really good! Props for getting the models so weathered and real looking too
This was my favorite film by him. Simple, little dialogue, fascinating to the end.
I totally agree. This is a fascinating gripping film and still a great favorite!
Yep. Jaws with a truck....
Very well shown. Thank You
Great remake crash scene. 🎥🎞️🎬✌️😎🚀🚀🥁🥁
🙏🙏
For all those commenting about the truck not exploding. You have to remember that in the original film, a full scale truck (emptied of fuel) and a car was used for the ending. These guys are demonstrating how the same effect can be achieved by using models to suit a film's budget. The only difference is, the flames in the car would of been CGI - I'm sure most of us are familiar with 70s disaster movies that models with water/fire dont mix, due to the different scales.
Man, I can't unsee it now
The original movie used an actual 18-wheeler that went over the hill.
@@theoriginaldashriprock lolwut
@@PANZERFAUST90 yep, it's true. The original movie filmed actual Vehicles going over the edge. Saw a TH-cam video not too long ago about a man who found that site, and the truck is still at the bottom of that hill.
@@theoriginaldashriprock lol nice!
Fantastic. Looks so incredibly real 😯
Stunning and very well captured. You have absolutely nailed it. What’s next?
Thanks :) next are Mission Impossible and Independence Day 😇
Yes
@@MiniaturesFX YES PLASE
MISSION 🎉🎉🎉
THEGOODBAD10777 OK
My father and I watched this on TV when I was about 11 or 12 because we both liked Dennis Weaver. I had no idea Spielberg directed it. I remember being absolutely terrified because I could see how a situation like this could realistically happen. Great movie!
Very cool!
I saw it first run on TV as a kid. It always crosses my mind when passing a big rig.
That was pretty cool ! I read the book back in the 80's. The movie is even better. Spielberg's first movie he Directed. Dennis Weaver was Awesome !
Duel was based on a short story that appeared in Playboy magazine. What book are you talkin bout, Chuckles?
@chiefscheider ok, professor it was a short story and not a book, short story like your personality !
I have to admit that I thought this was the "behind the scenes" shoot for this scene. It has been a long time since I saw the real movie. The slow-motion sequence made it realistic. But then, I saw the movie version, and a real truck and car were used. The REAL vehicles buckled, bent, and deformed much more. The key thing that gave it away was the heavy exhaust smoke in the REAL scene. That was a great setup you did.
The movie, for its time, was outstanding. The same for jaws. Now that Steve has the money and backing, it really shows how great he can make a move look. Saving Private Ryan and Band of Brothers were superb.
Le premier et le meilleur film de Spielberg, premier prix au festival d'Avoriaz car réellement "fantastique".
Bonne journée à tous 😊
Oui la révélation d’un vrai génie du cinéma !
best?
I don't know about that lol
@@PANZERFAUST90 ce n'est, selon moi, certes pas son film le plus spectaculaire et le plus populaire mais c'est le seul de ses films dans lequel j'ai éprouvé un réel sentiment d'étrangeté, de surnaturel, sans effet technique. C'est ce qui m'attire réellement dans un film "fantastique", le sentiment d'étrangeté. Ce simple camion qui harcèle une voiture est une idée géniale. Ce sentiment d'étrangeté, j'ai pu le retrouver par exemple dans "les oiseaux" d'Hitchcock quand l'héroïne se fait attaquer par une mouette dans sa barque, il n'y a aucune musique, rien de dramatique, uniquement cette simple attaque improbable et cela provoque chez le spectateur un fort sentiment de bizarrerie.
Bonne journée à vous 😊
Amazing how well this accurately works.
And just like that, the vilain died, and Steven Seagal won.
Seagal?
@@nomusicrc Steven Seagelberg, the director.
@@iododendron3416 do you mean Spielberg
@@nomusicrc no, Steven Seagelberg
@@iododendron3416 who's that
For a moment I thought it really was an accident ! Awesome!!
Saludos desde Cuba, Steven Spielberg's es un genio de nacimiento, 10 de 10 PeterBilt vs Ford Falcon
Hi from France 👋 🙏
Beautifully executed...
Still better than CGI.
Always better...
@@0patience4flz There will come a time when CGI does not look fake, and movie directors know how to use it without making it look fake. Probably long after anyone alive today is dead but they’ll get there someday. Er…maybe.
@@JoeOvercoat CGI will never be charming.
Modern CGI looks perfectly realistic. The problem is that if the CGI is perfectly realistic, nobody notices that it's CGI. The viewer only notices CGI when it has been done badly. Take Top Gun Maverick, for example: more than 90% of the airplanes are CGI. Even the shots filmed inside the cockpits are CGI, except for the faces. And yet nobody noticed. (They actually used real planes to shoot the movie, but the shots were only there to get the correct exposure and the planes were later replaced with CGI planes.) Even though more than half of the shots in this movie contain CGI, a lot of people who don't know anything about the production of modern movies have said that they like the fact that the movie has so little CGI. If you don't believe me that CGI is now perfectly realistic, just take a look at the series "No CGI is just invisible CGI" on TH-cam.
@@Li-Nuss A combination of real shots and CGI is ideal. I have always believed in that. And the new AI-technology uses the same principle. It base the result on real shots. But the problem is so many movies relies only on CGI. The first Jurassic Park for example looks more realistic than the newer movies with only CGI.
I love that movie! It is amazing for a "made for tv" movie. I saw it when it first aired, decades ago...I still remember that film!!!
1:56 the tires are shiny not dirty. 😮
That is incredible and I also enjoyed seeing it's done without cgi.👍🏼👍🏼
Glad you enjoyed it! 🙏
WHAT PLEASE NEXT DUEL CRASH OH 😂😂😂😂😂
Petertile 281 duel final what espidoe 7 CRASH MOVIE
Absolutely fantastic, a great job by everyone involved in this recreation.
Thank you kindly!
totally unrealistic because the tanker trailer would fold up on impact like an accordion at real life scale. It wouldn't simply bounce off the slope essentially unharmed like shown here. And the flames in the trunk are too big in proportion to the car itself for them to look real.
Yes. Make it better yourself.
@@Rafael-xr7ou no I don't have the intention
So, what you’re saying.. is that you totally missed the point of this video altogether. Truly an amazing comment 😂
The flames were the only thing that revealed the size. But very nicely done. And looks so much fun too.
If this is behind the scenes on a 1971 film, how is it shot in HD quality, and these guys are all dressed in clothing that reflect mid 2000s?? Also how do you explain the modern cars in the background @0:11? Was there a remake of the film? I’m confused. Seriously.
Just read that this was a recreation, answered my own question.
😇
When it was filmed in 1971 the quality was even better than HD because it was fimed on pellicule film.
I think only a RED or Arri camera's can compete with pellicule film.
I especially love how it looks just like a couple of toy cars falling off a miniature cliff in slow motion. Super realistic!
Glad you like it!
@@MiniaturesFX Irony much?
Jesus loves us.
I have a friend who specialises in this type of prop filming and the stuff he shows me is incredible. Super cool video.
Oh share his work :)
that looked terrible
A lot of reactions in this video really surprised me. People who think they are pros because they noticed “the truck doesn’t deform” (hint: even children know miniatures don’t deform, noticing it doesn’t make you a pro), yet they believe the 3D tools they use are super real (but they ignore the physics in those tools are inaccurate approximations of professional FEM/FEA packages). They probably don’t know what the battle of Hoth is, nor how it was filmed. They probably never heard of Harryhausen, and if they saw any of his scenes, they will say that’s a joke and they can do it better. In other words, they have no idea what FX is, they think the secret is the tool and not the person. Said this, kudos to the people who made this remake. Very well done. Even wheels vibrate at impact (I thought for a moment you were tricking using footage from the original movie), and even some parts detach. I also appreciate that shot in which you show the pin that connects the tank with the truck, it’s like you are saying “hey look, we used models”. Very well done, guys.
That was amazing especially considering this was all before CGI. The new generation does not even know enough to recognize how jaded they appear in not giving credit where credit is obliviously due. That truck in that movie scared the ever living crap out of me...to this day.
Absolutely agree… practical effects give me more emotion than CGI !
Miniatures and slow-mo…the Holy Grail of special effects.
Love all the effects in the old school films , yeah they weren't perfect but they had soul , real art .
Any young film fan should check out 'Alien' 1979 or 'The Thing' 1982.Incredible effects work .
Great clips guys , Dual was a great flick.
Very well done, the realism is most convincing.
😇
Genial gemacht. Toller Blick hinter die Kulissen.
Habe den Film schon mehrfach gesehen, immer wieder toll.
💐THE GOSPEL OF THE WORD OF ALMIGHTY GOD "the Salvation of the last day that Christ brought in the second and last incarnation of His new and holy name"
(This may be a reminder for most people of God's words from Genesis: "Let us make man in our image, according to our likeness." Suppose God is saying that "let us" make man in "our " picture, then "ours" shows two or more; since He said "ours," then God is not only one. In this way, man begins to think generally of different persons, and from these words came the idea of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. At the time Moses wrote Genesis, it was after the creation of mankind following the creation of the world. In the beginning, when the world, Moses did not exist yet. And it was a long time before Moses wrote the Bible, so how could he possibly know what God said in heaven? He was unaware of how God created the world. What is written in the Old Testament is the work of Jehovah, a phase of the work of God Himself for ushering in the Age of Law. This is the work of God, where as He spoke, it happened, and as He commanded, it remained. When all is said and done, whether it is the Father or the Son, They are one Spirit, not divided into separate persons. When man speaks of separate persons, does it not reflect God? Jehovah is the Spirit, and also a substance of Jesus. Doesn't the Spirit of God simply carry out the work of the Spirit from different perspectives?" Because of this, there is no distinction between persons.)
Almighty God said
This can be a REMINDER for most PEOPLE of GOD'S WORDS from GENESIS: "Let us make man in our image, after our likeness." Suppose GOD says "we" will CREATE MAN in "our" IMAGE, then "we" SHOWS TWO or MORE; since He SAID "we," then GOD is NOT one. IN THIS WAY, MAN BEGAN TO THINK GENERALLY OF DIFFERENT PERSONS, AND FROM THESE WORDS HAD THE IDEA OF THE FATHER, THE SON, AND THE HOLY SPIRIT. What then does the Father look like? What does the Son look like? And what does the Holy Spirit look like? ☀️🙏
Could it be that the present man was made in the image of the one who was put together from the three? Then is the image of man like that of the Father, the Son, or the Holy Spirit? 🙏
WHICH of the persons of GOD is the image of MAN? This idea of MAN is ABSOLUTELY WRONG and NONSENSE! It can only separate one God from several Gods. 🙏
AT THE TIME Moses WROTE GENESIS, it was AFTER MANKIND WAS CREATED AFTER THE CREATION OF THE WORLD. In the BEGINNING, when the WORLD began, Moses did NOT exist. And IT TOOK A LONG TIME FOR MOSES TO WRITE THE BIBLE, so HOW could he possibly KNOW WHAT GOD SAID in HEAVEN?🙏☀️
He is UNCONSCIOUS of HOW GOD CREATED THE WORLD. 🙏
In the OLD TESTAMENT of the Bible, there is NO mention of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, only the TRUE GOD, JEHOVAH, is PERFORMING His WORK in ISRAEL. ☀️
He is CALLED by different NAMES in the CHANGING TIMES, but this DOESN'T PROVE that each NAME REFERES to a different PERSON. Therefore, then wouldn't there be countless persons of God? What is WRITTEN in the OLD TESTAMENT is the WORK of JEHOVAH, A PHASE of the WORK of GOD HIMSELF for the START of the Age of Law. This is GOD'S WORK, where ACCORDING to what He SPOKE, it happened, and ACCORDING to what He commanded, it REMAINS. 🙏💐
AT NO TIME DID JEHOVAH SAY HE WAS THE FATHER WHO WOULD COME TO EFFECT THE WORK, or did He even foretell the coming of the Son to redeem mankind. WHEN IT CAME TO THE TIME OF JESUS, it was only mentioned that GOD became MAN to REDEEM ALL MANKIND, NOT that the SON CAME. ☀️
Because the times are not the same and the work that God Himself carries out is also different, He has to carry out His work within different kingdoms. In this way, the identity He represents is also different. PEOPLE BELIEVE JEHOVAH IS THE FATHER OF JESUS, but JESUS DOESN'T REALLY ACKNOWLEDGE, saying: "We were never identified as Father and Son; I and the Father in heaven are one. The Father is in Me and I am in the Father; when men see the Son, they see the Father in heaven." ☀️😪
When all is said and done, whether it is the Father or the Son, They are one Spirit, not divided into separate persons. By the time man attempts to explain, matters are complicated by the idea of different persons, as well as the relationship between Father, Son, and Spirit. WHEN MAN TALKS ABOUT separate persons, does it not reflect GOD? 🙏🔅
Man even ranks persons as first, second, and third; these are all mere human understandings, unworthy of reference, and utterly unreal! If you ask him: "How many are there in God?" He will say that God is the Trinity of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit: the one true God. If you ask him: "Who is the Father?" He will say: The Father is the Spirit of God in heaven; He rules over all, and He is the Lord of heaven." "Then is Jehovah the Spirit?" ☀️
He will say: "Yes!" If you ask him afterwards, "Who is the Son?" He will say that Jesus is the Son, anyway: "Then what is the story of Jesus? From whom did He come?" He will say: "Jesus was born of Mary through the shadowing of the Holy Spirit. " ☀️
"Then is not His substance also Spirit? Does His work also represent the Holy Spirit?
Jehovah is the Spirit, and also a substance of Jesus. Now in the last days, it goes without saying that the Spirit still works; how did He become different persons? Doesn't the Spirit of God just carry out the work of the Spirit from different perspectives? Because of this, there is no difference between personas. 🙏
From "Is There a Trinity?"
Fulfilled in "In the beginning He was the Word, the Word was with God, and the Word was God" (John 1:1). (Ezekiel 2:9-10). (Rev. 19:9,13)
📩 All who have "ears to listen" are led to what the Spirit of God is saying in His lowered and built kingdom/Church engraved with His new name, His totality, the ownership of this disposition, "THE CHURCH OF ALMIGHTY GOD "💐 fulfillment from what was said He to Peter 2,000 years ago recorded in (Matthew 16:18-19). His Coming is the fulfillment of all that was prophesied in the great book of Revelation, so the last "Salvation" He brought the whole truth, the way for eternal life. So the "victorious" ones who will receive them are the wise "virgins" because as recorded in the prophecy of His return no one knows it except the one who will receive it! So "come" and come to His kingdom/church standing in the holy place in the air/TH-cam! This is also a fulfillment from the book of (Isaiah 2:2/9:6) which He first fulfilled in His first incarnation. 📥
"They say with a loud voice, "Salvation comes from the Lamb, and from our God who sits on the Throne!" (Rev. 7:10). ... and (Isaiah 2: 2 / 9:6) "On the Last Day, the mountain on which Jehovah's temple stands will stand out above all the mountains. All nations will flock there. " . "For a baby boy is born to us. The rule will be given to him; and he shall be called Wonderful Counselor, Almighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace." 💌
We must understand that real metal does deform and bend, but the common eye watching this scene would not notice it. It is realistic enough to emulate a real crash. Movie making is magic with science.
Amazing resolution for such old footage
Yeah right totally possible thats from the 70s! It's a recreation dude and obviously so.
Excellent!
ABSOLUTELY AMAZING!!!
🙏🙏🙏
Looks so real at the end amazing
This is stunning 👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾
Brilliant! Love to see how things are done. There are those who say it "spoils the magic" but I disagree. You can still be very involved in the story while deeply appreciating the immense skill, attention to detail and the imagination that goes into making it. Just as you can appreciate the skill of an actor while still being involved in the story they are telling.
Agree 100%. You can know how a magic trick is done, but still be fascinated every time you see it.
Awesome!!! Love how the cab and the car come to rest in the chase position. As if to forever be locked in the chase.
And the trailer in the same position as the movie :)
It's like magic. If you know how, the fun is gone. And it's Art.
That was awesome work and talent! ❤
It's unbelievable what they can do with miniatures today! They're so realistic!
And with very low budget ;)
Gajab yaar mind blowing ultimate 👍😂
I believed. Real professional. Real job
Brilliant and realistic. I walked out of the last mad Max film because the digital effects were so obvious.
This scene looks so real with great sound effect and meticulous editing. Practical effects are the best. I am so tired to see CGI in superheroes flick.