ℹ: *1 flag = ~10,000 soldiers* If you would like to support me and my work, please consider donating to my new Patreon: www.patreon.com/mapsinanutshell If you'd like to turn your ideas into future videos and get early access to video teasers, join the Discord server here: discord.gg/4dNDQMsF5f
Each thought to me is a solar flare, which shifts us into parallel worlds!! It’s hard here!!! I’m a peaceful dude, yet my life here has been super difficult!!🥹 We’re each a mini universe!!🌌 The 3 Body Problem represents our gut brain, 🍱 heart,❤️ and mind!! 🧠 The moon is a black hole!! 🕳️ A neutrino!! The planet is a colonized moon!!😇🌍👽 The sun is a shapeshifter!! 🌞 Are you and I sculpting together as a team or as individuals??? 🧑🎨 Using the moon as a tool!!! 🪨 The Sun is the eye!!👁️ I like the word grinder!!!😮 We’d be Bumping and Grinding!!😂 The Earth is like a refrigerator and the atmospheric pressure is melting or defrosting the stars above, as if they’ve been in the freezer!! 🥶 We could be stars from above aka heaven, melting everything from above, as well!! Like a River Running Through It!!! 🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊 Unlocking a Secret Garden!!🤫 An Oasis!!!🏝️ 🏝️🏝️🏝️🏝️ Flowing!!! It helps a lot to flow!!!🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊 Letting go, so we can concentrate more and work on our project!! Heaven On Earth!!🌍 👼 Flowers!! 🌺 🌸 💐 and Flow-Ers!!🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊 I know energy is still impurrtant!! 😻 And of course imagination!!! Love!!!💗 🐶 🎾 🧶 🐈⬛ To create heaven On Earth, the galaxies collide!! 🌌 Twin flames connect!! 🔥 🔥 We’re creating quantum entanglement!! Ghost particles merging, becoming more like the Stay Puft Marshmallow Man!!👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻 The universe is still the Earth!!⭐️🌍⭐️ We’re seeing it from the insides!! 🕵️ Like we’re inside a volcano 🌋 or wishing well!! The stars and galaxies are like coins!!🪙 Everything and everyone has been our teacher!!👩🏫 3D is like the murky bottom of a bong or volcano!!🌋 The fourth dimension, representing Mars is like the stem of the bong or the volcanos vent!! 👽 Experiencing higher dimensions is like the smoke or magma reaching our mouths 😋 and then circulating through our bodies!! We are the Earth!!🌍 👼 Different energies tell a different story!! 📚 We’re storytellers!! We’re energy first!! 🐝
I once read the memoirs of a woman who was near Stalingrad, she told how they were surprised that some Italians had feathers in their headdresses. Then she didn’t yet know the word surrealism, but I think that’s it.
Right after 0:06 the video shows the front reaching the Don. The Soviets held the Germans back there, and kept important bridgeheads at Serafimovich, Kremenskya, and Kletskya.
Интересный факт: На тот момент в Сталинграде был завод по производству танков. Этот завод прямо во время боевых действий выпускал по несколько танков в день, которые сразу вступали в бой. И даже, когда немцы подошли к нему, сами сборщики и рабочие сели в свои же, только собранные танки и пошли в атаку!
@@polishlithuaniainanutshell5146not really, this was the turning point of the war and if the Germans held the city, it would have been a massive defeat to the soviets
They were close to gaining Stalingrad, but I don't think them winning the battle would result in them winning the war. The Germans were already overextended in their supply lines, their soldiers exhausted, and the Soviet's still vengeful. If the Germans won, they would have to advance more territories which they would be too weak to do so. Sure they can now get the oil in the Caucases, but they likely wouldn't get it. Either the Soviets burn the oil infrastructure or fight another battle, one that they would have won.
@@chrisstucker1813 soviets used POWs from japan, korea, germany, they dressed them up in soviet uniform giving soviet flags to charge german machine guns then shell the axis positions or sent out snipers from siberia to shoot them. which was a warcrime.
@@nerminerminerminermi There is one "little thing" due to which there is a huge difference in the figures of the dead soldiers of the USSR and Nazi Germany...namely, if a soldier died as a result of his wounds only after more than three days, the Nazis did not show that death as a military loss, but as a death due to other reasons !
@@itsdappi he doesnt know what keyframes are, it's basically where you just designate the start and end of where you want an object to go e.g. from top left to bottom right, and it will automatically animate the frames between within a certain timeframe you create.
till 1940 (france surrender) they lost less than 250,000 (with overestimation) in West. And less than 500,000 they lost during the whole African campaign (mostly Italian not German) By middle and logical estimation 400,000 they lost at Italian defense totally. And we reach to the main point at western Europe: nearly but not exceeding a million is the whole wounded and German KIA in western front. I mean the whole German Soldiers lost to all Allies except USSR is around two million veteran or nearly veterans. While they lost their most elite half of this number single handedly at Stalingrad if we calculate: Kursk, Moscow, Leningrad,Kiev, Sevastopol and 1943 to the end defense we may even reach like more than ten million! ( It's not exaggeration at all 70 percent of Germen male died at ww2 from a population like more than 30 million male. I think it's even more than fifteen.
i don't know where this myth came from, but a soldier in Stalingrad did not definitely die 15 minutes in fighting and there's no evidence to back this up.
@@TheD4rkGamesXD Esta es la estregia rusa: Sostener la linea y debilitar a los atacantes hasta que el enemigo esta tan debil que no solo no puede atacar, sino que tampoco puede defenderse. Funciona? Pues es exactamente lo que esta logrando en Ucrania. Pobre Ucranianos, nunca tuvieron alternativa.
@@TheD4rkGamesXD My grand grandfather was there and said the italians were useless on the eastern front and they were always losing the frontline and Romanians had to take it back.
You can really tell how the Soviets focused on the weaker flanks in order to enable that encirclement which was a major setback for Germany, despite being „only“ around 200k soldiers. It would have been really cool to see the strengths of those flanks in the animation.
“I'm dying, but I'm not giving up! Farewell, Motherland" On the first day, the Germans attempted eight unsuccessful attempts to break into the citadel. To break the resistance of those remaining in the fortress, the Germans used incendiary ammunition and tear gas. The aircraft bombed them with five hundred kilogram bombs. An 1,800-kilogram bomb was even dropped, hitting a corner of the wall fortress and shaking the entire city of Brest with its detonation. For almost a month, the defenders of the Brest Fortress pinned down an entire German division. The capture of the Brest Fortress - according to German historians - required the same forces from the Wehrmacht as the capture of Kyiv, the third largest city in the Soviet Union.
In America, we learn it was us who won WWII, freeing Europe. When we grow up, we learn it was the Soviets that beat Germany. Russia was rolling the Germany back starting in Nov '42, a year and a half before we landed on D-Day. Russians pushed the Germans back 1000 miles before the battle of Normandy. We came in late and fought outnumbered kids and senior citizens, while the Russians fought the German millions when Germany was at its strongest and still reached Berlin before the allies.
the russians had a lot of help from the allies with logistics and transportation even before D-day, besides even though the soviets outnumbered the germans they still took a lot more casualties
For them it was fighting or getting shot by the their officers. Dont forget Germany was defeated in África by the allies in the 1942 summer. And before that by the british in 1940.
the ussr and germany were friends until 1941. the soviets received an enormous amount of supplies from the usa. also germany was fighting other battles, which alleviated the pressure on the ussr. e.g. a quarter of germany's war production was defending germany from allied bombers. so it took the combined effort to defeat germany. also, a lot of soviet casualties were due to leadership incompetence and indifference about human losses.
The video itself is done very well, but there is a very gross mistake. The Red Army in the Battle of Stalingrad lost only ± 1,100,000 soldiers, and not 2,600,000 as the video. This is a very high estimate, even the propaganda of the Wehrmacht did not estimate the losses of the Red Army so much.😡😡😡
Wiki, with several references, gives these numbers "1,347,214[19]-2,672,000 casualties[20] 674,990-2,000,000 killed or missing 672,224 wounded or sick Total dead: c. 1,000,000[21]
@@queuedjar4578 They could've if they achieved some of their major war objectives (capture the Caucaus oil fields, nullify the UK into a conditional surrender/peace treaty, reaching the Ural Mountains during Operation Barbarossa, beat the Manhattan Project in successfully developing the first atomic weapon up in Norway, reaching the Suez Canal during the North African campaign, enticing Spain to join the Axis Powers and helping to shut off access to the Mediterranean for the Allies, building up the Kriegsmarine and a 40-000 strong U-Boat armada etc)
The losses of the USSR are too exaggerated due to the fact that losses are counted, among other things, for Operation Uranus and for the Stalingrad meat grinder itself, while the losses of the Wehrmacht are calculated ONLY for the Battle of Stalingrad. The USSR lost 1,129,619, and the Wehrmacht and its allies 1,500,000 people.
@@ugbuga The axis had overall better tactics and a lot of their offensive was on this battle and it is almost universally agreed that that the Soviets suffered far heavier casualties than the Axis not saying I support either too be clear
No they didnt. Their leadership had practically been begging Germany to provide those troops on the flanks with anti tank equipment since the start of the battle of Stalingrad, and even though German High Command said they would, they never did.
Full losses of USSR in entire battle of Stalingrag (including defensive and offensive operations) amounted 1 129 619 (irretrievable 478741 + sanitary 650878). Losses of the Axis 1 500 000+, (German 841000 + 237775 prisoners and + other nazis allies)
so you are giving the lowest estimation for the Soviets and the highest for the Germans? Which according to the wikipedia is overestimation the more real casulties is 158,854 Romanians 114,520 Italians 143,000 Hungarian 494,374 German Total: 910,748 Casulties and Soviets: 1,347,214 to 1,370,000 Casulties and this is still questioned as underestimation by many
@@V.E.N and? Wikipedia is giving casulties claimed by historians it isn't making its ow n claims if you think historians which claims it are wrong then what casulties are according to you?
@@dcs1058 Какие историки, о чём ты? 🤣 В Википедии правки может вносить любой кто пожелает и зачастую эти правки мало кто проверяет на достоверность. Более того, одна и та же статья на Википедии, но на разных языках может кардинально отличаться. Википедия ТОЧНО не является достоверным источником информации, тем более в политических или подобных темах)
Кому выгодно распространять ложь о потерях Красной Армии? Потери РККА - 1 130 000. Потери Третьего Рейха - 1 500 000. Взять и спецом нарисовать до 2 700 000 потерь РККА. Геббельс ролик монтировал?
Потери - это не только смерти, братан. Оно означает «мертвый», «захваченный», «раненый» и «больной», поэтому оно повышено. Casualties does not only mean deaths, it means Deaths, Captured, Wounded and Sick.
@@Jade-Official472 Ни о чем. "..повышено..." в отношении чего? Кто-то не умеет считать потери? Кто-то в потерях не учитывают "раненых и больных"? Есть понятие потерь и понятие безвозвратных потерь (т. е. убитых).
Can I ask where you got these loss figures from? Just from official sources, the losses of the USSR are 1,129,619, the axis losses are about 1,500,000.
"official" you mean soviet propaganda. It's well established that in every battle the soviet lost more troops than axis, especially in Stalingrad where they thrown everything. Look up "tikihistory" battlestorm serie, it shows the every day battle with maps and great detail. Or believe "official" source and keep crying they don't match with reality.
@@Rohald20 "well established that in every battle the soviet lost more troops than axis" No, it's not. Only in the diseased brain from "democratic" propaganda, which to the point of moronic naivety and arrogance believes that he is free from lies, and that lies are somewhere out there, in the "totalitarian Soviet Union".
Hitler could have just isolated the city, set up on the Volga, and moved into the Caucasus like they'd planned. But he stubbornly insisted that they take the city before moving on. What he ran into was the most staunchly determined defense meant to buy the Soviets time to assemble their reserves. It was during this time that Stalin got smart and started listening to the guys who knew what they were talking about and went with the pincers movement plan. This battle was just as, if not more pivotal than the D-day invasion. The casualties the Germans and Soviets suffered there were massive.
Well you are right because the D-day landing had absolutely zero effect to the outcome of the war. Though it kept the soviets and communist regimes out of western europe so there is that. (By June 1944 the war was long lost for the germans)
Contrary to popular belief, most of the casualties are actually at the outskirts of Stalingrad where the big battles were raging. It was their doctrine from the start of the war to avoid getting bogged down in cities and relying on isolating and encircling them, so it's not like they didn't try doing exactly what you described. How was he supposed to do that if they couldn't cross the Volga? The whole premise of Fall Blau and taking the Caucasus and the oil fields there was also completely off. The soviets destroyed every oil well they even closed in on, and it could take years to restore one. Hitler was warned by engineers about this, but he disregarded it. The WW2 Week by Week channel explains the level of sabotage from the soviets also very well. Specifically week 155 if you're interested.
@@SwitcherLittlebW The germans were able to get the Meikop oil fields running though not for long as they had to abandon anything below rostov as the soviets broke through the frontines all around Stalingrad in early 1943
Why do you indicate the losses of the USSR along with the civilian population? So that the German army does not look so weak or to show the heavy losses of the USSR? Oh yes, the USSR could only defeat Germany by throwing soldiers at them, but the French army lost because of General Frost
There were as many as 330K axis troops in Stalingrad pocket: 20 divisions of 6th Army, couple divisions of 4th Panzer and remnants of Romanian divisions
@@joshntn37111 I'm pointing out the fact the casualty figures have no relationship to what's going on in the video. You must be very old or very ignorant to not understand that.
Casualties wrong 1.5 millions Germans, and 1.2 millions Ussr. Yes, at the beggining Russians lose much more, but after Germans encirclement and surrendering numbers became diametrically opposed
Во всех источниках написано, что потери Советских войс 1130к( из них 643к в обороне и 487к в атаке),а немцев 1500к. Что за цифра такая автор, где нашёл такие данные? Просвети нас пожалуйста.
Why do you indicate the losses of the USSR along with the civilian population? So that the German army does not look so weak or to show the heavy losses of the USSR? Oh yes, the USSR could only defeat Germany by throwing soldiers at them, but the French army lost because of General Frost
during the Napoleonic wars Napoleon would have conquered Russia if it wasnt for the fact that Napoleons military was stretched thin all across Europe fighting against many different European empires and giant European coalitions all at the same time, Napoleon had to fight against Prussia, Britain, Austria, Sweden, Spain, Portugal, the Netherlands, Denmark, Norway, Switzerland, several German states, several Italian states, the Ottoman Empire, the Holy Roman Empire, the French Monarchy, and many others, and even so the Russian army STILL never defeated Napoleon, the only thing the Russian army did is retreat and run away farther east like a bunch of cowards while the cold weather did all the work to defeat Napoleons army, and even then the French defeated Russia in the 1st 5 coalition wars and the French revolutionary wars, and crushed the Russian-Austrian army at Austerlitz in 1805, and the same for WW2 the USSR needed the cold weather to save them from Germany, the only thing the Soviets did was run away farther east while the winter did all the work, if it wasnt for the winter then the Germans would have conquered the USSR, without the millions of US and Western troops defeating the Germans in Western Europe, Italy, and North Africa, plus without the US giving the USSR billions of dollars worth of guns, ammo, tanks, planes, trucks, jeeps, tractors, trains and locomotives, boxcars, train rail tracks, tires, steel, explosives, aluminum, wire, rubber, gun powder, fuel, food, clothes, blankets, cotton, army boots, radios, and other crucial military and logistical equipment through US Lend Lease then the USSR would have been steamrolled by Germany
@@UserName-om6ft =во время наполеоновских войн Наполеон завоевал бы Россию, если бы не тот факт, что армия Наполеона была растянута по всей Европе, сражаясь одновременно со многими различными европейскими империями и гигантскими европейскими коалициями. Наполеону пришлось сражаться против Пруссии, Великобритании, Австрии. , Швеция, Испания, Португалия, Нидерланды, Дания, Норвегия, Швейцария, несколько немецких государств, несколько итальянских государств, Османская империя, Священная Римская империя, Французская монархия и многие другие, и даже при этом российская армия ЕЩЕ ни разу не победила Наполеон= во время русского похода наполеона единственное место в европе где он еще воевал это была испания... партизанская война хотя испанские войска участвовали в русском походе где вы набрали в рот и голову столько отборной дерьмовой лжи попробуйте учить историю не по методичкам для идиотов =, единственное, что сделала русская армия, это отступила и убежала дальше на восток как кучка трусов, в то время как холода сделали всю работу по разгрому армии Наполеона= пока трусливые русские воевали с наполеоном, отважная европа сдалась и участвовала с в войне против россии на французской стороне ))) а трусливые русские не захотели воевать по правилам отважных европейцев, а коварно победили по собственным... всю европу )))) =, да и то французы победили Россию в 1-й 5-ти коалиционных войнах и французы революционные войны и разгромили русско-австрийскую армию при Аустерлице в 1805 году,= так кого французы победили в коалиционных войнах? россию? точно? ))) а "коалиция"="россия"? ))) ни знания истории ни знания логики ни знания языка =и то же самое во время Второй мировой войны, СССР понадобилась холодная погода, чтобы спасти их от Германии= по плану барбароса, ссср должен был быть разбит (выход на линию: Архангельск-Астрахань) в сентябре 41 года... ...коварные русские морозы лета-начало осени =, единственное, что сделали Советы, это убежали дальше на восток, а зима сделала всю работу , если бы не зима, то немцы завоевали бы СССР= с каким же удовольствием тебе подобные воспроизводят нацистские выдумки, которыми вас кормит "свобода слова" (что не удивительно, если помнить сколько работников из министерства пропаганды третьего рейха туда попало после 45 года) про "русских варваров", которым не холодно... "холодная погода" это когда немецкие механизированные группы, которые завоевали всю европу и господствовали все лето 41 года, снова получили возможность для работы. почему гитлер не догадывался о "зиме", тебе в методичках имени "свободы слова" не написали про такой вариант? ))) ой!.. да? )) =если бы не зима, то немцы завоевали бы СССР= если бы не сша с британией, не было бы гитлера = без миллионов американских и западных войск, разгромивших немцев в Западной Европе, Италии и Северной Африке= после того как ссср уничтожил наиболее боеспособную половину вермахта и его союзников. в частности- итальянских =плюс без того, чтобы США предоставили СССР оружие на миллиарды долларов. , боеприпасы, танки, самолеты, грузовики, джипы, тракторы, поезда и локомотивы, товарные вагоны, железнодорожные пути, шины, сталь, взрывчатка, алюминий, проволока, резина, порох, топливо, продукты питания, одежда, одеяла, хлопок, армейские ботинки , радиоприемники и другое важнейшее военное и логистическое оборудование по ленд-лизу США,= четыре пятых которого ссср получил после: победы под московой сталинградом курской дуги- переломивших весь ход второй мировой войны = тогда СССР был бы уничтожен Германией.= если бы не запад, вырастивший гитлера, войны бы не было вовсе но война необходима западу. вековая традиция завоевания ради прибыли по этому сша и британия, как и вся остальная европа, обожали фашистов и растили гитлера для похода на восток. и лишь таланты советского руководства заставили бешенного пса покусать руку хозяина но запад лишь тогда вступил в игру, когда было видно, что опоздание подобно смерти.... для кармана да, сша инвестировала во вторую мировую еще удачнее чем в первую: больше половины мирового ввп 45 года большая часть мирового флота золотого запаса мира мировая рассчетная и резервная валюта а британская империя (против которой сша и затевала эту "игру") проиграла хороший англсаксонский бизнес: война, бандитизм, терроризм, расизм, фашизм, нацизм.. проверено веками
@@ДмитрийТрудов-х7к yes Russia was part of the allied coalition so therefor Russia lost to Napoleon in the 1st 5 coalition wars and the French revolutionary wars, Russia only defeated Napoleon once, Napoleon defeated Russia 5 times in the 1st 5 coalition wars, France defeated Russia in the Crimean war in 1856, and the grand humiliation of the Russian-Austrian army at Austerlitz in 1805, Borodino 1812 especially proves Napoleon could have conquered Russia if not for the cold weather, Winter of 1941 and Winter of 1942 saved the USSR from destruction wrong, only 60-70% of the German KIA was on the eastern front and even less if we count total casualties which includes captured, the western allies defeated Germanys best general Rommel and chased him out of Africa, the USSR won at Moscow when 40-50% of the tanks at the battle of Moscow came from the west, not just US Lend Lease but also British Lend Lease saved the USSR, most of British Lend Lease came in 1941 and most of US Lend Lease came in summer and fall of 1942 and later 1943, the Germans didnt start losing ground until early 1943 On 12 July, 1941, within weeks of the German invasion of the USSR, the Anglo-Soviet Agreement was signed and the first British aid convoy set off along the dangerous Arctic Sea route to Murmansk, arriving in September. It carried 40 Hawker Hurricanes along with 550 mechanics and pilots of No. 151 Wing in Operation Benedict, to provide air defense of the port and to train Soviet pilots. The convoy was the first of many convoys to Murmansk and Archangelsk in what became known as the Arctic convoys. Towards the end of 1941, early shipments of Matilda, Valentine and Tetrarch represented between 40-50% of the tanks the Soviets used in the battle of Moscow. Starting in June 1941, Britain delivered to the USSR: 7,411 aircraft (>3,000 Hurricanes and >4,000 other aircraft) 27 naval vessels 5,218 tanks (including 1,380 Valentines from Canada) >5,000 anti-tank guns 4,020 ambulances and trucks 323 machinery trucks (mobile vehicle workshops equipped with generators and all the welding and power tools required to perform heavy servicing) 1,212 Universal Carriers and Loyd Carriers (with another 1,348 from Canada) 1,721 motorcycles £1.15bn ($1.55bn) worth of aircraft engines 1,474 radar sets 4,338 radio sets 600 naval radar and sonar sets Hundreds of naval guns 15 million pairs of boots In total 4 million tons of war material including food and medical supplies were delivered. Starting in 1941, the United States delivered to the Soviet Union 427,284 trucks, 13,303 tanks, 35,170 motorcycles, 2,328 ordnance service vehicles, 2,670,371 tons of petroleum products (gasoline and oil) or 57.8 percent of the aviation fuel including nearly 90 percent of high-octane fuel used, 4,478,116 tons of foodstuffs (canned meats, sugar, flour, salt, etc.), 1,911 steam locomotives, 66 diesel locomotives, 9,920 flat cars, 1,000 dump cars, 120 tank cars, and 35 heavy machinery cars. Ordnance goods (ammunition, artillery shells, mines, assorted explosives) provided amounted to 53 percent of total domestic consumption. One item typical of many was a tire plant that was lifted bodily from the Ford Company's River Rouge Plant and transferred to the USSR. the USSR helped HitIer's Germany come to power and allied with them in 1939 to help invade Poland from 2 sides, MEMORANDUM ON THE GERMAN-SOVIET COMMERCIAL AGREEMENT SIGNED ON FEBRUARY 11, 1940 The Agreement is based on the correspondence-mentioned in the preamble-between the Reich Minister for Foreign Affairs and the Chairman of the Council of People's Commissars, Molotov, dated September 28, 1939. The Agreement represents the first great step toward the economic program envisaged by both sides and is to be followed by others. The Agreement covers a period of 27 months, i. e., the Soviet deliveries, which are to be made within 18 months. The Soviet deliveries. According to the Agreement, the Soviet Union shall within the first 12 months deliver raw materials in the amount of approximately 500 million Reichsmarks. In addition, the Soviets will deliver raw materials, contemplated in the Credit Agreement of August 19, 1939, for the same period, in the amount of approximately 100 million Reichsmarks. The most important raw materials are the following: 1,000,000 tons of grain for cattle, and of legumes, in the amount of 120 million Reichsmarks 900,000 tons of mineral oil in the amount of approximately 115 million Reichsmarks 100,000 tons of cotton in the amount of approximately 90 million Reichsmarks 500,000 tons of phosphates 100,000 tons of chrome ores 500,000 tons of iron ore 300,000 tons of scrap iron and pig iron 2,400 kg. of platinum Manganese ore, metals, lumber, and numerous other raw materials. To this must also be added the Soviet exports to the Protectorate, which are not included in the Agreement, in the amount of about 50 million Reichsmarks so that the net deliveries of goods from the Soviet Union during the first treaty year amount to a total of 650 million Reichsmarks. In addition, there are other important benefits. On the basis of the correspondence of September 28, 1939, the Soviet Union had granted us the right of transit to and from Romania, Iran, and Afghanistan and the countries of the Far East, which is particularly important in view of the German soybean purchases from Manchukuo. The freight rates of the Trans-Siberian Railroad were reduced by 50 percent for soybeans. The transit freight charges are to be settled by a clearing system and amount to approximately 100 million Reichsmarks. Adding certain other items, it may be assumed that during the first 12 months Soviet deliveries and services will amount to a total of about 800 million Reichsmarks. Thus far, only part of the Soviet deliveries has been fixed for the second treaty year. During the first 6 months of the second treaty year the Soviet Union will deliver to Germany 230 million Reichsmarks worth of raw materials of the same kind as in the first treaty year. It is contemplated that negotiations will be resumed before the expiration of the first treaty year and the quantities for the exchange of goods for the second treaty year fixed and even increased beyond the volume of the first treaty year. The German deliveries comprise industrial products, industrial processes and installations as well as war materiel. The Soviet deliveries of the first 12 months are to be compensated by us within 15 months. The Soviet deliveries of the first 6 months of the second treaty year (13th to 18th month) are to be compensated by us within 12 months (from the 16th to the 27th month). Among the Soviet deliveries within the first 18 months are 11,000 tons of copper, 3,000 tons of nickel, 950 tons of tin, 500 tons of molybdenum, 500 tons of wolfram, 40 tons of cobalt. The Agreement means a wide open door to the East for us. The raw material provided by the Soviet Union and from the countries bordering the Soviet Union can still be considerably increased. But it is essential to meet the German commitments to the extent required. In view of the great volume this will require a special effort. If we succeed in extending and expanding exports to the East in the required volume, the effects of the English blockade will be decisively weakened by the incoming raw materials. BERLIN, February 26, 1940.
@@UserName-om6ft =да, Россия была частью союзной коалиции, поэтому Россия проиграла Наполеону в первых 5 коалиционных войнах и французских революционных войнах Россия победила Наполеона только один раз, Наполеон победил Россию 5 раз в первых 5 коалиционных войнах= эт верно.. западные "союзники" это такое дерьмо, с которым лучше не связываться- проиграешь уж лучше когда они все вместе с наполеоном, всей европой против тебя... не ждешь ножа в спину =Франция разгром России в Крымской войне 1856 г.= там кроме франции больше ни кого не было? точно? ))) и только в крыму дело было? ни на дальнем востоке, ни на камчатке, ни в белом море, ни в балтике? ни против пруссии не надо было в польше держать войска? ))) у вас не память, а дуршлаг... или вы намеренно пытаетесь (неудачно) лгать ;) =и грандиозное унижение русско-австрийской армии при Аустерлице в 1805 г., Бородино 1812 г. особенно доказывает, что Наполеон мог бы завоевать Россию, если бы не холодная погода= если вы хотели мне еще раз продемонстрировать нацизм, которым заряжены "цивилизованные" европейцы и англосаксы.. только забыли сделать "ручкой" от сердца к солнцу, когда начали рассказывать про русских варваров, которым плевать на холода не стесняйтесь... вы так хотели... мог бы.. если бы не климат, дороги... плохому танцору яйца мешают ))) а русские тут жили и живут. в этом климате. в этих расстояниях. а вы даже прийти пограбить нормально не смогли... неоднократно не смогли ))) =Зима 1941 г. и зима 1942 г. спасли СССР от разрушения= как же зима могла спасти, если план Барбаросса был рассчитан до сентября месяца? ))) =ошибаюсь, только 60-70% немецких убитых было на восточном фронте и еще меньше, если посчитать общие потери, включая пленные= больше трех четвертей вермахта уничтожила ркка а пленные в 45-ом году радостно бежали к своим создателям близким по духу вы потом еще нацистов радостно пристраивали в разные места... от начальников нато до "журналистов" на свои сми. или в ракетную программу в штатах., =западные союзники разгромили лучшего генерала Германии Роммеля и выгнали его из Африки= ))) лучшего... лишь по тому что вы были худшими вас гоняли две танковые дивизии ссаной тряпкой два года )) =СССР победил под Москвой в 40 г. -50% танков в битве под Москвой пришли с запада, не только американский ленд-лиз, но и британский ленд-лиз спас СССР= ))) идиот!!! битва под москвой это декабрь 41-январь 42 года не "50% танков", а менее 50 танков (из тысячи участвовавших в той битве) только британских. купленных за золото, а не по ленд-лизу. по ленд-лизу, за октябрь-ноябрь было всего поставлено 182 штуки. которые сразу пошли в ремонт-доукомплектование =большая часть британского ленд-лиза пришлась на 1941 год= тут важно не путать ленд-лиз с торговыми закупками соглашение о ленд-лизе было подписано лишь в октябре 41 года =, а большая часть американского ленд-лиза пришлась на лето и осень 1941 года= 80% американского лендлиза поступила в ссср с конца 43 по лето 45 года =. В 1942 и позднее 1943 годах немцы начали сдавать позиции только в начале 1943 года.= немцы были впервые понесли стратегическое поражение в 41 году под москвой перелом войны произошел под сталинградом в июне-июле 43 (курская дуга) года немцы полностью потеряли стратегическую инициативу =12 июля 1941 года, через несколько недель после вторжения Германии в СССР, было подписано англо-советское соглашение, и первый британский конвой с гуманитарной помощью отправился по опасному морскому маршруту в Мурманск и прибыл в сентябре. На нем было 40 самолетов Hawker Hurricanes, а также 550 механиков и пилотов 151-го крыла в операции «Бенедикт» для обеспечения противовоздушной обороны порта и обучения советских пилотов. Конвой был первым из многих конвоев в Мурманск и Архангельск, которые стали известны как арктические конвои. К концу 1941 года первые поставки «Матильды», «Валентайна» и «Тетрарха» составляли от 40 до 50% танков, которые Советы использовали в битве под Москвой.= конвой дервиш прибыл в архангельск 31.08-01.09 за грузы заплачено золотом в битве под москвой участвовало менее 50 британских танков из, приблизительно, 1000 штук
@@UserName-om6ft =Начиная с 1941 года, США поставили в Советский Союз 427 284 грузовика, 13 303 танка, 35 170 мотоциклов, 2 328 машин артиллерийского обслуживания, 2 670 371 тонну нефтепродуктов (бензина и нефти) или 57,8 процента авиационного топлива, в том числе почти 90 процентов высокосортного. использовано октановое топливо= бензин шел на американские же самолеты =4478116 тонн пищевых продуктов (мясные консервы, сахар, мука, соль и др.), 1911 паровозов, 66 тепловозов, 9920 платформ, 1000 думпкаров, 120 цистерн, 35 вагонов тяжелой техники. Поставленные боеприпасы (боеприпасы, артиллерийские снаряды, мины, различные взрывчатые вещества) составили 53 процента от общего внутреннего потребления.= боеприпасы по лендлизу ссср получал к импортной технике, полученной по лендлизу =Типичным для многих объектом был шинный завод, который был полностью вывезен из завода компании Ford в Ривер-Руж и передан СССР.= еще нефтезаводы получали =СССР помог гитлеровской Германии прийти к власти= ??? что?!!! )))) прийти или не прийти к власти германии?))) ...могли лишь те, кто на правах победителей 1 мировой войны в версале разделил германию, ограничил ее армию и флот, клялся сдерживать германский потенциал, получал с германии репарации. =...и вступил с ней в союз в 1939 году, чтобы помочь вторжению в Польшу с двух сторон.= э... вы про то, что британия, франция, польша, "вступили в союз с германией, что бы помочь ей во вторжении..." в чехословакию, в 38 году? ))) давайте еще вашей травы! )) пока ссср с 37 по 39 год воевал с германией, италией, фашистской испанией и японией, версальские гаранты сдерживания германии: заливали германию кредитами, технологиями, промышленными предприятиями, золотом, целыми европейскими промышленно-развитыми странами, разрушали созданные ссср антигитлеровские союзы. разумеется учителя, покровители и создатели гитлера, ни когда не простят сталину, что тот обманул обманщиков, вырастивших бешенного пса против ссср (как сейчас украину против россии)... и заставил этого пса хватить хозяина за руку ))) разумеется хозяева учителя и симпатизанты фашистов, ни когда не простят что ссср натравил их голема на них самих )) вы это хотели написать? )) когда ссср начал свой освободительный поход, "польша" уже была в румынии )) очень сложно "нападать с двух сторон" в румынию )) но вой хозяев адольфа понятен... их детищу пришлось дважды завоевывать западную украину ))) = МЕМОРАНДУМ О ГЕРМАНСКО-СОВЕТСКОМ ТОРГОВОМ СОГЛАШЕНИИ, ПОДПИСАННЫЙ 11 ФЕВРАЛЯ 1940 ГОДА. ... Наиболее важным сырьем является следующее: 1 000 000 тонн зерна для крупного рогатого скота и бобовых на сумму 120 миллионов рейхсмарок.= кормовое зерно... страшня подмога гитлеру то ли дело - заводы форда, давшие тяжелые грузовики =900 000 тонн нефтепродуктов на сумму примерно 115 миллионов рейхсмарок.= что гораздо меньше чем германия могла бы захватить в польше и прибалтике можете дальше страдать про "союз с гитлером" ))) =К этому следует добавить еще советский экспорт в Протекторат, который не включен в Соглашение, на сумму около 50 миллионов рейхсмарок, так что чистые поставки товаров из Советского Союза в течение первого договорного года составят в общей сложности 650 миллионов рейхсмарок. = а можно подобную справку о торговых отношениях сша и третьего рейха за этот период? а за предыдущий? )))) про то как отдали золото чехословакиии гитлеру, на какую сумму будет информация? )) =Кроме того, есть и другие важные преимущества. На основании переписки от 28 сентября 1939 года Советский Союз предоставил нам право транзита в Румынию, Иран, Афганистан и страны Дальнего Востока и обратно, что особенно важно ввиду немецких закупок сои. из Маньчжоу-Го. Провозные ставки Транссибирской магистрали на соевые бобы снижены на 50 процентов. Расходы на транзитные перевозки подлежат расчету по клиринговой системе и составляют примерно 100 миллионов рейхсмарок.= не было ни какой "переписки от 28 сентября 1939 года" был договор о друж =Если добавить к этому некоторые другие статьи, то можно предположить, что в течение первых 12 месяцев советские поставки и услуги составят в общей сложности около 800 миллионов рейхсмарок.= немецкие поставки в ссср превосходили обратное "течение" )) можно об этом информацию? нет?!! в вашей методичке про это не сказано? ))) удивительно! )))) а "добавлять" и "предполагать", это синоним "высосать из пальца"?.. да, да, да... того самого )))
the numbers here destroy the myth of the ussr's overwhelming numbers being a key factor in their success; it wasn't until after 1943 that the russians really gained an edge in terms of raw numbers
Even this video exagerates the numbers. They’ve included the civilians on the soviet side. Without the civilians it’s 1.5 mil to 1.5 mil. So it’s a 1 to 1 loss ratio.
People want a indepth lengthy version of this should check out TIKhistory's 51 episode series. Though based on that series, he points out the 6th Army was given very little if any reinforcements after they reached the city primarily do to resource shortages and also do to a rivalry between General Halder and General Paulus. ie Halder prioritized other fronts over sending reinforcements to Stalingrad, surprisingly even Hitler did, as Stalingrad was actually a side show. German high command unlike the common misconception believed Paulus should be able to take the city with the forces he had, even if it took longer than they planned. So seeing repeated long columns of divisions marching in like this video shows is likely not accurate at all.
@@abanomex9038 its not the large buildup of soviet forces but rather the fact that romanian troops were poorly supplied and lacked anti tank weapons and artillery (also most of the army was still equiped with bolt action rifles but i think that was still the case for the germans and soviet at that time)
It's almost like they had been asking Germany for anti tank equipment that never came even when promised. Romanians acted smart, it was once again the fault of german high command.
@kamarempire6277BC they said 1.3 million half of which are sick he also chose the highest overestimated number of casualties 2.6 million which has been proven false by many historians.
@360NoScope-nm3lh Proven false, while yes its definitly false, you just gave the answer to your question. He uses the highest estimate out there from *wikipedia*
Это выдумка твоя из ниоткуда, если бы у СССР было на 3 млн больше потерь он бы не выиграл, гораздо убедительнее звучит, что немуы потеряли больше@@СпонсорОбсирателей
This city is not Kursk, nor is it Kiev, nor Minsk. This city... is Stalingrad. STALINGRAD! This city bears the name of the Boss. It's more than a city, it's a symbol. Love that movie
No it was not our fault. We were poorly equipped and practically asking the Germans for anti tank weapons and artillery since the beginning of the battle (they didn’t provide)
People say Germany lost the war because the battle of Stalingrad was too costly. This is not true. Most battles lost in 1942 and 1943 were due to running low on fuel and ammo. If Germany had good supply lines they could have bounced back from Stalingrad just like the Soviets bounced back from the Rhzev meat grinder. The battle of the bulge failed for the same reason
💬Потери России в Украине ликвидированными и ранеными составляют около 450 тысяч человек. Об этом сообщает The Insider со ссылкой на заместителя государственного секретаря по вооружённым силам Великобритании Лео Догерти
Claro, aunque tambien no lo hubieran podido lograr de no ser por el prestamo y arriendo, y que Alemania haya estado desviando recursos a otros frentes contra Reino Unido y Estados Unidos. Hay que reconocer a todos por igual, la URSS es la protagonista de la derrota alemana pero tambien hay que reconocer la aportacion occidental, comentarios cargados de ideologias, no, porfavor.
@@thefumyandthechev equipo especializado para la industria ayudo a que un t-34 se fabricara en torno a 3 veces mas rapido y barato, la URSS tenia una industria pobre, los asesores estadounidenses ayudaron en mucho a la indistria sovietica, sin contar los millones de suministros, vias ferreas, el 90% del material ferroviario de la URSS durante toda la guerra fue entregado por USA, la URSS solo fabricando un 10%, como te digo la industria sovietica era pobre, 1 vs 1 la URSS no le ganaba a Alemania, reconocimiento a todos los aliados que aportaron a la derrota alemana.
@@SuddenStrike_HQ yeah, that's the 3rd and 4th Romanian army, they were regarded as being our best forces and consisted of about 200k troops, at the end of the encirclement they weren't given any mercy since they were among the last to surrender, those who survived were sent to gulags in Siberia and while a few would return, most of them died either at stalingrad or in Siberia. And that's considered our greatest military loss ever, the casualties were so high, never had we lost so many soldiers before and probably never will.
@@Orcram yeah me neither, while we had to invade the soviets to take back our territories, any advancements outside of our original territories were just plain greedy, while I do feel bad for the common soldiers who joined the army to take back our lands and then suddenly found themselves fighting in stalingrad
@@dimitri6171 I am a communist and have researched a lot of what the soviets did pre ww2 and most of it seems logical. The soviets tried to create a defensive pact with Britain and France and when that failed they signed a nonaggression pact with the Germans with a clause to divide poland, which the Soviets assumed would happen in 1941-1942 period. But then when the germans invaded poland one day after the soviets signed the deal the Soviets had to quickly organize a disorganized force to send into poland. Then you got the Soviets trying to push the finnish border back from leningrad to prevent an easy capture. And then (for a reason I don't understand) the Soviets blatantly annexed Bessarabia. I do not understand the economic, political, or strategic goal the Soviets had in mind when taking Bessarabia. All it did was Piss the Romanian people off.
people have already dictated their terms to the Russians and the Russians agreed and conceded Mongolian invasion 1241 Polish conquer Moscow 1610 Crimean war 1856 Russo-Japanese war 1905 WW1 Eastern Front 1918 treaty of Brest-Litovsk Cold War 1991
@@UserName-om6ft =люди уже продиктовали свои условия русским и русские согласились и уступили Монгольское вторжение 1241 г.= вам напомнить где границы золотой орды, а где нынешние границы россии? )) =Поляки покоряют Москву 1610 г.= вам напомнить как закончили те поляки? )) =Крымская война 1856 г.= =Русско-японская война 1905 года.= не вижу японцев ни в манчжурии, ни в корее ни во владивостоке )) на сахалине, кстати, тоже )) =Восточный фронт Первой мировой войны, Брест-Литовский договор 1918 г.= о да! кстати, тогда РИ танцевала под условия франции и британии... добровольно а германию вынесли на кулачках и через полгода договор в бресте перестал действовать, если не знали )) =Холодная война 1991 года= тоже верно и теперь вы видите куда вас привел ваш обман, когда вы обманули нас, подписав договор об окончании холодной войны но не прекратив ее против нас.
@@ДмитрийТрудов-х7к Russia defeated Mongolia only 1 time, Mongolia defeated Russia in the 1st invasion 1223 Kalka river, main invasion in 1241, Pyana River 1377, and Siege of Moscow 1382, Poland was able to defeat Russia more times than Russia could defeat Poland, Russia also has no victories over Japan while Japan annihilated Russia in 1905 even humiliated your navy, the US defeated Japan in 1945 and saved the USSR from Germany, in WW1 Germany lost to the Western Entente but they crushed Russia on the Eastern Front, the USSR correctly fell apart in 1991 ending the cold war with Western victory, as it should be, Western hegemony and capitalism must prevail, downfall of communism was the greatest gift to humanity and when the Russian Federation collapses again here in the modern time period it will be even greater for humanity
@@UserName-om6ft = Россия победила Монголию только 1 раз, Монголия победила Россию в 1-м вторжении 1223 г. Река Калка, главное вторжение в 1241 г., река Пьяна 1377 г. и осада Москвы 1382 г. = ага... если не учитывать, что на 11 век "монголия"=китай+персия+турция+средняя азия+кавкац... лишь три причины того, что "монголия" не дошла до "лиссабона": смерть императора, сопротивление русских в тылу, выполнили завевт императора дойдя до "моря на западе" - андриатики =Польша смогла победить Россию больше раз, чем Россия смогла победить Польшу= ))))) до польша побеждала до полного своего исчезновения вы несее такую крутую чушь )) =Россия также не имеет побед над Японией= у вас забавный глобус на котором капитуляцию япония не подписывала на "миссури"? )) =, в то время как Япония уничтожила Россию в 1905 году, даже унизила ваш флот, США победили Японию в 1945 году= в каком месте "победили"? ))) уничтожив материковую базу японии с производством и сырьем? )) где "победили"? на море? )) не высаживаясь на сами острова или на материк? )) = и спасли СССР от Германии, в Первой мировой войне= ссср в первой мировой войне? ))))) где вы берете такую траву? )) = Германия проиграла Западной Антанте, но они разгромили Россию на Восточном фронте= )))) вы только что написали про "спасли".. как же "спасли" если "разгромили"? ))) вам бы определиться с той чушью что вы несете )) и потом, вы забыли как "западная антанта" вместе с восточной пошла грабить и убивать россию... и была выпнута из ее территории.. вся антанта... от японии до китая, и до сша, британии и франции (всего - больше десятка государств) =, СССР правильно пал кроме завершения холодной войны победой Запада в 1991 году= ну да.. когда подписываем равный мир, а потом нарушаем все его условия, это "правильно"... именно по этому правильно, что лжецы сша и их подстилки теперь ни кому не нужны и вам ни кто не верит и теперь вы идете к черту стройными рядами =, как и должно быть, западная гегемония и капитализм должны восторжествовать, падение коммунизма было величайшим подарком человечеству= дадада... вечная война всех против всех, ограбление сильного слабым, войны и убийства, терроризм и госперевороты и все ради прибыли сша... это "воссторжествововать.." и "величайший подарок человечеству"... только не человечеству и главным убийцам и грабителям мира - западным олигархам.. чьей шлюхой ты и тебе подобные являются =, и когда Российская Федерация снова рухнет здесь, в современный период времени, это будет еще больше для человечества= твое "человечество" это твои хозяева- убийцы и грабители, изобретатели фашизма, нацизма, концлагерей, расизма в пределах всего земного шара.. и твоя и их ложь уже не поможет вам удержаться на вершине этой гнойной системы войн, грабежа, убийств, коррупции и террора ваши хозяева уже взвешены и сочтены легкими
@@ДмитрийТрудов-х7к Mongolia humiliated Russia 4 times, Poland only disappear because of Germany, Austria, and Prussia, when Russia didnt have its allies the Polish always won, yes Japan surrender to the US on the Missouri the US is the one who defeated Japan not the USSR, the US did not save the USSR in WW1 i said the US saved the USSR from Germany from WW2, Russia straight up lost to Germany in WW1 and would have lost again in WW2 if not for the US and the West, the communists failed in the late 1910s and 1920s, Russia lost to Germany in WW1 on the eastern front in 1918 treaty of Brest-Litovsk, Russia lost to Poland in the failed Soviet westwards offensives in 1919, Russia lost to Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia in their wars for independence in 1919 and 1920, Russia lost to Georgia in the Georgian-Ossetian conflict in 1920, Russia lost to Poland in the Soviet-Polish war in 1921, Russia lost to Turkey in the Turkish war of independence in 1922, Russia lost to Afghanistan in the Urtatagi conflict in 1926, Russia lost to Afghanistan in the failed red army intervention in Afghanistan in 1929 etc... Russia is the terrorist of the world, Russia invades and kills civilians in Ukraine, Georgia, Chechnya, Syria, Dagestan, your USSR ally with Nazi Germany to invade Poland from 2 sides Molotov-Ribbentrop pact, Russian war crimes in central African republic, Mali, also the Holodomor, Russia kiIIs civilians in Goloshchekin genocide, how the USSR kiIIed civilians when they entered Germany and Berlin, Gulags and Soviet concentration camps, Katyn massacre, the US and the west fights for democracy, human rights, and the grand world order we are the good guys of the earth, Russia has always been evil and we will fight to the last drop of blood to eradicate your poison ideology and your fascist, imperialist anti western views
What many people seem to not realise is that romanian political and military leadership had constantly been asking Germany to provide anti tank equipment for the romanians on the flanks. The German High Command said yes, and yes whenever they were asked for this equipment since around the start of the battle, but they never provided the romanians with it.
they had meat and not equipment so they threw meat in the meatgrinder to stall for time till they had prepared enough equipment to bite back and that resulted in the encirclement. It wouldn't have worked if Stalin didn't have an iron grip on entire Russia.
![BOWKYLION - วิงวอน (ex-change) [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/cLdnZWDaO-w/mqdefault.jpg)
ℹ: *1 flag = ~10,000 soldiers*
If you would like to support me and my work, please consider donating to my new Patreon: www.patreon.com/mapsinanutshell
If you'd like to turn your ideas into future videos and get early access to video teasers, join the Discord server here: discord.gg/4dNDQMsF5f
Can you make WW2 with units?
good job on this vid man
Each thought to me is a solar flare, which shifts us into parallel worlds!! It’s hard here!!! I’m a peaceful dude, yet my life here has been super difficult!!🥹
We’re each a mini universe!!🌌
The 3 Body Problem represents our gut brain, 🍱 heart,❤️ and mind!! 🧠
The moon is a black hole!! 🕳️ A neutrino!! The planet is a colonized moon!!😇🌍👽 The sun is a shapeshifter!! 🌞
Are you and I sculpting together as a team or as individuals??? 🧑🎨 Using the moon as a tool!!! 🪨 The Sun is the eye!!👁️
I like the word grinder!!!😮 We’d be Bumping and Grinding!!😂
The Earth is like a refrigerator and the atmospheric pressure is melting or defrosting the stars above, as if they’ve been in the freezer!! 🥶
We could be stars from above aka heaven, melting everything from above, as well!! Like a River Running Through It!!! 🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊
Unlocking a Secret Garden!!🤫 An Oasis!!!🏝️ 🏝️🏝️🏝️🏝️
Flowing!!! It helps a lot to flow!!!🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊 Letting go, so we can concentrate more and work on our project!! Heaven On Earth!!🌍 👼
Flowers!! 🌺 🌸 💐 and Flow-Ers!!🌊🌊🌊🌊🌊
I know energy is still impurrtant!! 😻
And of course imagination!!! Love!!!💗 🐶 🎾 🧶 🐈⬛
To create heaven On Earth, the galaxies collide!! 🌌 Twin flames connect!! 🔥 🔥 We’re creating quantum entanglement!! Ghost particles merging, becoming more like the Stay Puft Marshmallow Man!!👻👻👻👻👻👻👻👻
The universe is still the Earth!!⭐️🌍⭐️ We’re seeing it from the insides!! 🕵️ Like we’re inside a volcano 🌋 or wishing well!! The stars and galaxies are like coins!!🪙
Everything and everyone has been our teacher!!👩🏫
3D is like the murky bottom of a bong or volcano!!🌋 The fourth dimension, representing Mars is like the stem of the bong or the volcanos vent!! 👽 Experiencing higher dimensions is like the smoke or magma reaching our mouths 😋 and then circulating through our bodies!! We are the Earth!!🌍 👼
Different energies tell a different story!! 📚
We’re storytellers!! We’re energy first!! 🐝
sigma
Honestly, the Germans should’ve known that putting Italian and Romanian troops to the north and south of Stalingrad was basically a death sentence.
Hitler knew he was going to die so he took everyone with him.
wdym
@@GabeTheGamer Italian troops were actually decent, just that their leadership was trash
They did ok given the situation they were in and the equipment they had, honestly what choice did the Germans have?
There were no other troops lmao it was a 1150 mile front the germans could simply not fill it up
The sheer number of troops and casualties in this battle is staggering.
Deadliest battle in the history of mankind I think
"Staggering" 💀
NATO "I got this bro, hold me beer"
@@TheD4rkGamesXDIts not staggering to you?
@@cynicalPixels1:00 Lmao NATO would get steameolles by ww2 germany
Why Stalingrad is the largest city in the world? Because it takes 6 months to get from one end to the other!
from one side of the street to another
4138
@Marcin2BSGerman "leopards" are in Moscow! But there's one small detail...
Slov'yansk, Ukraine is 100 times larger. muscovytes 11 year cant get them😂😂😂
@@Походеньки россию обсирает а сам по ней катается !! СМЕХ!
“This cutscene is so boring, im skipping it” 0:37 - 0:40
“Wait why our soldiers are encircled???”
😂
Our? 😂
@@wookie1503 Hitlers pov
@@wookie1503 yes comrade, OUR
Cope
Seeing Italian and Romanian troops in Stalinigrad is something else other than a normal change of perception of time
I once read the memoirs of a woman who was near Stalingrad, she told how they were surprised that some Italians had feathers in their headdresses. Then she didn’t yet know the word surrealism, but I think that’s it.
@@Indyxx87 Это было на Дону, в Сталинграде их не было.
Right after 0:06 the video shows the front reaching the Don. The Soviets held the Germans back there, and kept important bridgeheads at Serafimovich, Kremenskya, and Kletskya.
@@Indyxx87Alpini!
Интересный факт:
На тот момент в Сталинграде был завод по производству танков. Этот завод прямо во время боевых действий выпускал по несколько танков в день, которые сразу вступали в бой. И даже, когда немцы подошли к нему, сами сборщики и рабочие сели в свои же, только собранные танки и пошли в атаку!
Еще интересный факт:
В те дни экономили время на покраску танков, и они выходили с завода в "металлическом" цвете.
интересный факт: сегодняшнему поколению слова не скажи, сразу абьюз токсик и депрессия
@@Ivan-wp1ne1 нахуй ты это высрал ?
Не совсем так, потом он их ремонтировал. И отправлял комплектующие на другие заводы.
как можно верить в настолько глупые сказки, ну это же просто бред, полное отсутствие здравого смысла!?
You see how close Germany was to beating Russia here - it is crazy to think one city may have changed the entire war.
The war was lost even before Stalingrad, this was just the final nail in the coffin
@@polishlithuaniainanutshell5146not really, this was the turning point of the war and if the Germans held the city, it would have been a massive defeat to the soviets
Нет.
Немчура не победила бы, если бы получила нефть на Кавказе.
Вы видимо пересмотрели new order или man in high castle
They were close to gaining Stalingrad, but I don't think them winning the battle would result in them winning the war. The Germans were already overextended in their supply lines, their soldiers exhausted, and the Soviet's still vengeful. If the Germans won, they would have to advance more territories which they would be too weak to do so. Sure they can now get the oil in the Caucases, but they likely wouldn't get it. Either the Soviets burn the oil infrastructure or fight another battle, one that they would have won.
I find it crazy because of the casualties. Irs so frickin deadly.
Remember everyone casualties don’t mean just deaths
Still the deaths in the battle are at least as high as about 2 to 2.5 million what makes it still the deadliest battle in history
@@nerminerminerminermi1.1 million Soviet soldiers died in the battle to defend the city. Just think about that for a second…It’s absolute insanity
@@chrisstucker1813 soviets used POWs from japan, korea, germany, they dressed them up in soviet uniform giving soviet flags to charge german machine guns then shell the axis positions or sent out snipers from siberia to shoot them. which was a warcrime.
@@DarkLord666-f1w This is from South Korean movie "My Way", not an actual thing. Also i doubt it is even a warcrime to do so
@@nerminerminerminermi There is one "little thing" due to which there is a huge difference in the figures of the dead soldiers of the USSR and Nazi Germany...namely, if a soldier died as a result of his wounds only after more than three days, the Nazis did not show that death as a military loss, but as a death due to other reasons !
Your work really is incredible, the patience for the KeyFrames of each
flag, keep up the good work bro.
its not animated frame by frame bro its keyframes
@@itsdappi yeah Keyframes, THX bro
true but this is not accurate. made up units
@@itsdappi he doesnt know what keyframes are, it's basically where you just designate the start and end of where you want an object to go e.g. from top left to bottom right, and it will automatically animate the frames between within a certain timeframe you create.
@@Geo_Unveiled yeah I make these myself ik what they are
The Germans lost more men in Stalingrad than they did on the entire western front.
Definitely not true.
@@joshntn37111absolutely true
They lost much more in Stalingrad than they did in the West. "So much more"
till 1940 (france surrender) they lost less than 250,000 (with overestimation) in West.
And less than 500,000 they lost during the whole African campaign (mostly Italian not German)
By middle and logical estimation 400,000 they lost at Italian defense totally.
And we reach to the main point at western Europe: nearly but not exceeding a million is the whole wounded and German KIA in western front.
I mean the whole German Soldiers lost to all Allies except USSR is around two million veteran or nearly veterans.
While they lost their most elite half of this number single handedly at Stalingrad if we calculate: Kursk, Moscow, Leningrad,Kiev, Sevastopol and 1943 to the end defense we may even reach like more than ten million! ( It's not exaggeration at all 70 percent of Germen male died at ww2 from a population like more than 30 million male.
I think it's even more than fifteen.
@@joshntn37111learn history not by tictoks
0:41 That one Romanian army 💀
Fr 💀💀💀💀
Bear hug
Can anyone tell me what place that the romanians were surrounded?
Russia
@@vincentxu4709Volga river
not so fun fact: average life expectancy in Stalingrad battle was 15 minutes
15 minutes 💀
i don't know where this myth came from, but a soldier in Stalingrad did not definitely die 15 minutes in fighting and there's no evidence to back this up.
Pretty sure it was 24 hrs
No, it was 24 hours
@@blanchet9153still crazy
0:37 Operation uran started
Lo que no entiendo como es que de la nada quito a todos los alemanes y rumanos rápidamente...
@@TheD4rkGamesXD they were overrun by Soviet forces.
Edit: or destroyed in battle.
@@Orcram si se pero es increible como tan rápidamente quito a toda esa fila de alemanes
@@TheD4rkGamesXD
Esta es la estregia rusa: Sostener la linea y debilitar a los atacantes hasta que el enemigo esta tan debil que no solo no puede atacar, sino que tampoco puede defenderse. Funciona? Pues es exactamente lo que esta logrando en Ucrania. Pobre Ucranianos, nunca tuvieron alternativa.
@@TheD4rkGamesXD My grand grandfather was there and said the italians were useless on the eastern front and they were always losing the frontline and Romanians had to take it back.
You can really tell how the Soviets focused on the weaker flanks in order to enable that encirclement which was a major setback for Germany, despite being „only“ around 200k soldiers.
It would have been really cool to see the strengths of those flanks in the animation.
Awesome video! One of your best so far man, cheers!
Yup!
you grazed him!
-victor reznov in the battle of stalingrad
you only wounded him!
“It was just a decoy!”
😂 still people out there WHO know Reznov 👌🏽
THE 🐐
World at War?
love the improved quality 👍
Where are the hungarians? They lost an entire army in this battle and they doesnt appear here
They were placed further to the North, in the area of Voronesh. The 2nd Hungarian Army lost 2/3 of about 200.000 men.
венгров в плен не брали
They were putins spies like now
0:10 the Soviets look closed to encirclement
Germans needed to cross a massive river to encircle them. The line they didn't cross was the river, and the opposite shore was teeming with soviets.
“I'm dying, but I'm not giving up! Farewell, Motherland"
On the first day, the Germans attempted eight unsuccessful attempts to break into the citadel.
To break the resistance of those remaining in the fortress, the Germans used incendiary ammunition and tear gas. The aircraft bombed them with five hundred kilogram bombs. An 1,800-kilogram bomb was even dropped, hitting a corner of the wall fortress and shaking the entire city of Brest with its detonation.
For almost a month, the defenders of the Brest Fortress pinned down an entire German division. The capture of the Brest Fortress - according to German historians - required the same forces from the Wehrmacht as the capture of Kyiv, the third largest city in the Soviet Union.
Этот ролик не про Брест.
@@Arkan0409Так к слову человек привёл текст. Что там плохого или не так?
@@pocemonspivom а что хорошего?
In America, we learn it was us who won WWII, freeing Europe. When we grow up, we learn it was the Soviets that beat Germany. Russia was rolling the Germany back starting in Nov '42, a year and a half before we landed on D-Day. Russians pushed the Germans back 1000 miles before the battle of Normandy. We came in late and fought outnumbered kids and senior citizens, while the Russians fought the German millions when Germany was at its strongest and still reached Berlin before the allies.
the russians had a lot of help from the allies with logistics and transportation even before D-day, besides even though the soviets outnumbered the germans they still took a lot more casualties
@@dawgcat3087 expected, simple more troops = more deaths
For them it was fighting or getting shot by the their officers. Dont forget Germany was defeated in África by the allies in the 1942 summer. And before that by the british in 1940.
the ussr and germany were friends until 1941. the soviets received an enormous amount of supplies from the usa. also germany was fighting other battles, which alleviated the pressure on the ussr. e.g. a quarter of germany's war production was defending germany from allied bombers. so it took the combined effort to defeat germany. also, a lot of soviet casualties were due to leadership incompetence and indifference about human losses.
@@zarzavattzarzavatt9309 americas aid was a fracture of the soviet supply
The video itself is done very well, but there is a very gross mistake. The Red Army in the Battle of Stalingrad lost only ± 1,100,000 soldiers, and not 2,600,000 as the video.
This is a very high estimate, even the propaganda of the Wehrmacht did not estimate the losses of the Red Army so much.😡😡😡
I think civilians are also included
@alexcyrp1129 Its:
Killed, injured, civilian, wounded and sick
@@PVZzombieguyisn’t that pretty much the definition of casualties… or people unable to fight like being injured
Wiki, with several references, gives these numbers "1,347,214[19]-2,672,000 casualties[20]
674,990-2,000,000 killed or missing
672,224 wounded or sick
Total dead: c. 1,000,000[21]
Nice job on remastering your videos! Now for the others
200k Romanians died for nothing at Stalingrad 😢
skill issue
@@Ismael_Malikshahi Equipment issue
Fascist supporter?
the 2.7 million soviets:
They did die, without them we would all be speaking German, you are Romanian i believe and you down shame those who liberated the city
How did u get these casualties number? it is 1.5 vs 1.5 million according to wikipedia
А им нормально. Заградотряды, одна винтовка на троих и прочее. Западная пропаганда не меняется.
В Смоленской битве когда союз оборонялся потери были 700 000/ 100 000. Причём стратегически это была победа
Those are the numbers inside of the city itself. This front line is including a bit more than the city.
@@captainrev4959 no, they concern the whole battle.
@@Dubov-i3xзабыл людские волны
Please do Yugoslav wars next, that will be very interesting to map out. 🙂
Stalingrad was in fact the turning point in WW2.
The turning point was September 1st 1939 (Germany could have never won the war).
@@queuedjar4578 That date was the start of the war. Not the turning point of it.
@@metalrocker627 You didn't read my parenthesis. Germany never could have won so the moment they started the war was the turning point.
@@queuedjar4578 They could've if they achieved some of their major war objectives (capture the Caucaus oil fields, nullify the UK into a conditional surrender/peace treaty, reaching the Ural Mountains during Operation Barbarossa, beat the Manhattan Project in successfully developing the first atomic weapon up in Norway, reaching the Suez Canal during the North African campaign, enticing Spain to join the Axis Powers and helping to shut off access to the Mediterranean for the Allies, building up the Kriegsmarine and a 40-000 strong U-Boat armada etc)
@@queuedjar4578 germany couldn't win at the time usa entered the war u noob u have no idea
The losses of the USSR are too exaggerated due to the fact that losses are counted, among other things, for Operation Uranus and for the Stalingrad meat grinder itself, while the losses of the Wehrmacht are calculated ONLY for the Battle of Stalingrad.
The USSR lost 1,129,619, and the Wehrmacht and its allies 1,500,000 people.
The fact you’re saying the axis had more casualties in this battle is insane
😂😂
Operation Uranus. Sorry 😂
@@gummilad2Why?
@@ugbuga The axis had overall better tactics and a lot of their offensive was on this battle and it is almost universally agreed that that the Soviets suffered far heavier casualties than the Axis not saying I support either too be clear
The Romanians made the blunder of the century in terms of military planning
No,they didn't have enough equipment
Romanians fought as hard as Germans, they didn’t have the equipment
No they didnt. Their leadership had practically been begging Germany to provide those troops on the flanks with anti tank equipment since the start of the battle of Stalingrad, and even though German High Command said they would, they never did.
@@rarescevei8268их проблемы что они такие тупые
@@rarescevei8268if you do any research beyond the surface you’ll find ww2 is littered with Germany fucking up then blaming someone else.
0:36 - 0:41 эти 5 секунд в этом видео, изменили ход войны
@@K4C17S5F2а вы это к чему?
А они бы всё равно не смогли. Гитлер должен был объединяться с Союзом, тогда бы они весь мир захватили
Важное уточнение - на Востоке. На Западе к концу 40-го уже было все +- понятно: Германия не смогла победить тогда, а шансов лучше уже не будет.
jajajajajaj me da mucha risa lo que da esa voz de Hitler
@@thomasschmidt1452 так она из-за этого и не смогла
*Paulus has went offline*
“I think Paul unplugged his router again”
Full losses of USSR in entire battle of Stalingrag (including defensive and offensive operations) amounted 1 129 619 (irretrievable 478741 + sanitary 650878).
Losses of the Axis 1 500 000+, (German 841000 + 237775 prisoners and + other nazis allies)
so you are giving the lowest estimation for the Soviets and the highest for the Germans? Which according to the wikipedia is overestimation
the more real casulties is
158,854 Romanians
114,520 Italians
143,000 Hungarian
494,374 German
Total: 910,748 Casulties
and Soviets: 1,347,214 to 1,370,000 Casulties and this is still questioned as underestimation by many
@@dcs1058Википедия? Серьёзно?) Это явно не тот источник, которому стоит доверять
@@V.E.N and? Wikipedia is giving casulties claimed by historians it isn't making its ow n claims
if you think historians which claims it are wrong then what casulties are according to you?
@@dcs1058 Какие историки, о чём ты? 🤣 В Википедии правки может вносить любой кто пожелает и зачастую эти правки мало кто проверяет на достоверность. Более того, одна и та же статья на Википедии, но на разных языках может кардинально отличаться.
Википедия ТОЧНО не является достоверным источником информации, тем более в политических или подобных темах)
Writing by Putin
great video! its definitely improved since the first one!
The scale of the battle is scary
Cool lore idea ! Might use it in the future !
Just impressive how USSR had a huge amount of Soldiers and Resources. Their the country you should not mess with.
Each one of those digits is a person with hopes and dreams... FFS war is horrible
It helped with overpopulation.
Nice, could you do Battle of Warsaw 1920? I think this would look great!
That a 💀💀💀
тот самый момент когда СССР ненавидели русские и поляки одновременно
"No mercy will be shown to my comrades in Stalingrad! No mercy will be shown here! An eye for an eye!" - Viktor Reznov from Cod World at War
No one gonna talk about that Romanian flag encircled at 0:39 ?
4 likes bru
Make that 5 cause W topic
Sorry, my English is not fluent, but what is the question? Romanian corps on flanks? It is a fact
@@ПавелК-123 The small 27,000 encirclement, not the big 330,000 encirclement in Stalingrad.
@@makhadensen_67 naturally. Most encircled troops were German, bur some Romanian as well.
As far as I remember Italian and Spanish troops suffered too
Still unbelievable that all those numbers are individuals thrown into battle.
Кому выгодно распространять ложь о потерях Красной Армии?
Потери РККА - 1 130 000.
Потери Третьего Рейха - 1 500 000.
Взять и спецом нарисовать до 2 700 000 потерь РККА.
Геббельс ролик монтировал?
Ты хочешь от них правды? Они на стороне немцев были.
Кто был на стороне немцев?
@@ФБР-ФСБ Как минимум, эвропа.
Потери - это не только смерти, братан. Оно означает «мертвый», «захваченный», «раненый» и «больной», поэтому оно повышено.
Casualties does not only mean deaths, it means Deaths, Captured, Wounded and Sick.
@@Jade-Official472 Ни о чем. "..повышено..." в отношении чего? Кто-то не умеет считать потери? Кто-то в потерях не учитывают "раненых и больных"? Есть понятие потерь и понятие безвозвратных потерь (т. е. убитых).
Can I ask where you got these loss figures from? Just from official sources, the losses of the USSR are 1,129,619, the axis losses are about 1,500,000.
"official" you mean soviet propaganda. It's well established that in every battle the soviet lost more troops than axis, especially in Stalingrad where they thrown everything. Look up "tikihistory" battlestorm serie, it shows the every day battle with maps and great detail. Or believe "official" source and keep crying they don't match with reality.
@@Rohald20 "well established that in every battle the soviet lost more troops than axis" No, it's not. Only in the diseased brain from "democratic" propaganda, which to the point of moronic naivety and arrogance believes that he is free from lies, and that lies are somewhere out there, in the "totalitarian Soviet Union".
Hitler could have just isolated the city, set up on the Volga, and moved into the Caucasus like they'd planned. But he stubbornly insisted that they take the city before moving on. What he ran into was the most staunchly determined defense meant to buy the Soviets time to assemble their reserves. It was during this time that Stalin got smart and started listening to the guys who knew what they were talking about and went with the pincers movement plan.
This battle was just as, if not more pivotal than the D-day invasion. The casualties the Germans and Soviets suffered there were massive.
El estalin se convirtió en Einstein
The Caucasus defences were hardening fast, Stalingrad had to fall else the Germans would risk a counter attack.
Well you are right because the D-day landing had absolutely zero effect to the outcome of the war. Though it kept the soviets and communist regimes out of western europe so there is that.
(By June 1944 the war was long lost for the germans)
Contrary to popular belief, most of the casualties are actually at the outskirts of Stalingrad where the big battles were raging. It was their doctrine from the start of the war to avoid getting bogged down in cities and relying on isolating and encircling them, so it's not like they didn't try doing exactly what you described. How was he supposed to do that if they couldn't cross the Volga?
The whole premise of Fall Blau and taking the Caucasus and the oil fields there was also completely off. The soviets destroyed every oil well they even closed in on, and it could take years to restore one. Hitler was warned by engineers about this, but he disregarded it. The WW2 Week by Week channel explains the level of sabotage from the soviets also very well. Specifically week 155 if you're interested.
@@SwitcherLittlebW The germans were able to get the Meikop oil fields running though not for long as they had to abandon anything below rostov as the soviets broke through the frontines all around Stalingrad in early 1943
How do you do this with google earth
They overvalued the romanians, they basically lost the war for Germany
The lack of equipment lost the war, not the romanians. Anti-tank weapons were non existent and many of the romanian troops had no guns.
What an awesome video! 😯
The casualties are wrong. It's 1.1 million for the Soviets (480k KIA), and 750k for the Axis (400k KIA)
Are you high? 😂
1.000.000 for soviets and 1.200.000 for Axis
@@Piece-Of-Time no
@@drownindesigner I'm 1000x times right
Its crazy to think that all those casualties all come from front line fighting. No crazy encirclements, no nothing. Just combat.
Casualties sources: trust me bro
Why do you indicate the losses of the USSR along with the civilian population? So that the German army does not look so weak or to show the heavy losses of the USSR? Oh yes, the USSR could only defeat Germany by throwing soldiers at them, but the French army lost because of General Frost
He takes the casualties from Wikipedia, oh and he counts casualties as injured, dead, military and civilian casualties combined.
@@johnsch1988He doesn't want to fill the screen with numbers. And also it looks nicer.
@@PVZzombieguy на википедии число потерь совсем другое и далеко не в пользу Германии)
Stopping kids from saying first.
I'm first to reply
Lol
Third
@@suitednoob A shit.
first
There were as many as 330K axis troops in Stalingrad pocket: 20 divisions of 6th Army, couple divisions of 4th Panzer and remnants of Romanian divisions
So they started taking casualties before the lines even met, but the collapse of the Stalingrad pocket cause no jump in casualties at all? 🤔🙄
What are you talking about? You must be just young or very ignorant.
@@joshntn37111 I'm pointing out the fact the casualty figures have no relationship to what's going on in the video. You must be very old or very ignorant to not understand that.
somewhere in the south is Baskunchak, the railway junction that supplied Stalingrad
Casualties wrong 1.5 millions Germans, and 1.2 millions Ussr. Yes, at the beggining Russians lose much more, but after Germans encirclement and surrendering numbers became diametrically opposed
Source?
@@PVZzombieguy на википедии можешь почитать, там все источники указаны и числа такие же.
Cope
Во всех источниках написано, что потери Советских войс 1130к( из них 643к в обороне и 487к в атаке),а немцев 1500к. Что за цифра такая автор, где нашёл такие данные? Просвети нас пожалуйста.
Why do you indicate the losses of the USSR along with the civilian population? So that the German army does not look so weak or to show the heavy losses of the USSR? Oh yes, the USSR could only defeat Germany by throwing soldiers at them, but the French army lost because of General Frost
during the Napoleonic wars Napoleon would have conquered Russia if it wasnt for the fact that Napoleons military was stretched thin all across Europe fighting against many different European empires and giant European coalitions all at the same time, Napoleon had to fight against Prussia, Britain, Austria, Sweden, Spain, Portugal, the Netherlands, Denmark, Norway, Switzerland, several German states, several Italian states, the Ottoman Empire, the Holy Roman Empire, the French Monarchy, and many others, and even so the Russian army STILL never defeated Napoleon, the only thing the Russian army did is retreat and run away farther east like a bunch of cowards while the cold weather did all the work to defeat Napoleons army, and even then the French defeated Russia in the 1st 5 coalition wars and the French revolutionary wars, and crushed the Russian-Austrian army at Austerlitz in 1805, and the same for WW2 the USSR needed the cold weather to save them from Germany, the only thing the Soviets did was run away farther east while the winter did all the work, if it wasnt for the winter then the Germans would have conquered the USSR, without the millions of US and Western troops defeating the Germans in Western Europe, Italy, and North Africa, plus without the US giving the USSR billions of dollars worth of guns, ammo, tanks, planes, trucks, jeeps, tractors, trains and locomotives, boxcars, train rail tracks, tires, steel, explosives, aluminum, wire, rubber, gun powder, fuel, food, clothes, blankets, cotton, army boots, radios, and other crucial military and logistical equipment through US Lend Lease then the USSR would have been steamrolled by Germany
@@UserName-om6ft =во время наполеоновских войн Наполеон завоевал бы Россию, если бы не тот факт, что армия Наполеона была растянута по всей Европе, сражаясь одновременно со многими различными европейскими империями и гигантскими европейскими коалициями. Наполеону пришлось сражаться против Пруссии, Великобритании, Австрии. , Швеция, Испания, Португалия, Нидерланды, Дания, Норвегия, Швейцария, несколько немецких государств, несколько итальянских государств, Османская империя, Священная Римская империя, Французская монархия и многие другие, и даже при этом российская армия ЕЩЕ ни разу не победила Наполеон=
во время русского похода наполеона единственное место в европе где он еще воевал это была испания... партизанская война
хотя испанские войска участвовали в русском походе
где вы набрали в рот и голову столько отборной дерьмовой лжи
попробуйте учить историю не по методичкам для идиотов
=, единственное, что сделала русская армия, это отступила и убежала дальше на восток как кучка трусов, в то время как холода сделали всю работу по разгрому армии Наполеона=
пока трусливые русские воевали с наполеоном, отважная европа сдалась и участвовала с в войне против россии на французской стороне )))
а трусливые русские не захотели воевать по правилам отважных европейцев, а коварно победили по собственным... всю европу ))))
=, да и то французы победили Россию в 1-й 5-ти коалиционных войнах и французы революционные войны и разгромили русско-австрийскую армию при Аустерлице в 1805 году,=
так кого французы победили в коалиционных войнах? россию? точно? )))
а "коалиция"="россия"? )))
ни знания истории
ни знания логики
ни знания языка
=и то же самое во время Второй мировой войны, СССР понадобилась холодная погода, чтобы спасти их от Германии=
по плану барбароса, ссср должен был быть разбит (выход на линию: Архангельск-Астрахань) в сентябре 41 года...
...коварные русские морозы лета-начало осени
=, единственное, что сделали Советы, это убежали дальше на восток, а зима сделала всю работу , если бы не зима, то немцы завоевали бы СССР=
с каким же удовольствием тебе подобные воспроизводят нацистские выдумки, которыми вас кормит "свобода слова" (что не удивительно, если помнить сколько работников из министерства пропаганды третьего рейха туда попало после 45 года) про "русских варваров", которым не холодно...
"холодная погода" это когда немецкие механизированные группы, которые завоевали всю европу и господствовали все лето 41 года, снова получили возможность для работы.
почему гитлер не догадывался о "зиме", тебе в методичках имени "свободы слова" не написали про такой вариант? )))
ой!.. да? ))
=если бы не зима, то немцы завоевали бы СССР=
если бы не сша с британией, не было бы гитлера
= без миллионов американских и западных войск, разгромивших немцев в Западной Европе, Италии и Северной Африке=
после того как ссср уничтожил наиболее боеспособную половину вермахта и его союзников. в частности- итальянских
=плюс без того, чтобы США предоставили СССР оружие на миллиарды долларов. , боеприпасы, танки, самолеты, грузовики, джипы, тракторы, поезда и локомотивы, товарные вагоны, железнодорожные пути, шины, сталь, взрывчатка, алюминий, проволока, резина, порох, топливо, продукты питания, одежда, одеяла, хлопок, армейские ботинки , радиоприемники и другое важнейшее военное и логистическое оборудование по ленд-лизу США,=
четыре пятых которого ссср получил после:
победы под московой
сталинградом
курской дуги- переломивших весь ход второй мировой войны
= тогда СССР был бы уничтожен Германией.=
если бы не запад, вырастивший гитлера, войны бы не было вовсе
но война необходима западу. вековая традиция завоевания ради прибыли
по этому сша и британия, как и вся остальная европа, обожали фашистов и растили гитлера для похода на восток. и лишь таланты советского руководства заставили бешенного пса покусать руку хозяина
но запад лишь тогда вступил в игру, когда было видно, что опоздание подобно смерти.... для кармана
да, сша инвестировала во вторую мировую еще удачнее чем в первую:
больше половины мирового ввп 45 года
большая часть мирового флота
золотого запаса мира
мировая рассчетная и резервная валюта
а британская империя (против которой сша и затевала эту "игру") проиграла
хороший англсаксонский бизнес: война, бандитизм, терроризм, расизм, фашизм, нацизм.. проверено веками
@@ДмитрийТрудов-х7к yes Russia was part of the allied coalition so therefor Russia lost to Napoleon in the 1st 5 coalition wars and the French revolutionary wars, Russia only defeated Napoleon once, Napoleon defeated Russia 5 times in the 1st 5 coalition wars, France defeated Russia in the Crimean war in 1856, and the grand humiliation of the Russian-Austrian army at Austerlitz in 1805, Borodino 1812 especially proves Napoleon could have conquered Russia if not for the cold weather, Winter of 1941 and Winter of 1942 saved the USSR from destruction
wrong, only 60-70% of the German KIA was on the eastern front and even less if we count total casualties which includes captured, the western allies defeated Germanys best general Rommel and chased him out of Africa, the USSR won at Moscow when 40-50% of the tanks at the battle of Moscow came from the west, not just US Lend Lease but also British Lend Lease saved the USSR, most of British Lend Lease came in 1941 and most of US Lend Lease came in summer and fall of 1942 and later 1943, the Germans didnt start losing ground until early 1943
On 12 July, 1941, within weeks of the German invasion of the USSR, the Anglo-Soviet Agreement was signed and the first British aid convoy set off along the dangerous Arctic Sea route to Murmansk, arriving in September. It carried 40 Hawker Hurricanes along with 550 mechanics and pilots of No. 151 Wing in Operation Benedict, to provide air defense of the port and to train Soviet pilots. The convoy was the first of many convoys to Murmansk and Archangelsk in what became known as the Arctic convoys. Towards the end of 1941, early shipments of Matilda, Valentine and Tetrarch represented between 40-50% of the tanks the Soviets used in the battle of Moscow.
Starting in June 1941, Britain delivered to the USSR:
7,411 aircraft (>3,000 Hurricanes and >4,000 other aircraft)
27 naval vessels
5,218 tanks (including 1,380 Valentines from Canada)
>5,000 anti-tank guns
4,020 ambulances and trucks
323 machinery trucks (mobile vehicle workshops equipped with generators and all the welding and power tools required to perform heavy servicing)
1,212 Universal Carriers and Loyd Carriers (with another 1,348 from Canada)
1,721 motorcycles
£1.15bn ($1.55bn) worth of aircraft engines
1,474 radar sets
4,338 radio sets
600 naval radar and sonar sets
Hundreds of naval guns
15 million pairs of boots
In total 4 million tons of war material including food and medical supplies were delivered.
Starting in 1941, the United States delivered to the Soviet Union 427,284 trucks, 13,303 tanks, 35,170 motorcycles, 2,328 ordnance service vehicles, 2,670,371 tons of petroleum products (gasoline and oil) or 57.8 percent of the aviation fuel including nearly 90 percent of high-octane fuel used, 4,478,116 tons of foodstuffs (canned meats, sugar, flour, salt, etc.), 1,911 steam locomotives, 66 diesel locomotives, 9,920 flat cars, 1,000 dump cars, 120 tank cars, and 35 heavy machinery cars. Ordnance goods (ammunition, artillery shells, mines, assorted explosives) provided amounted to 53 percent of total domestic consumption. One item typical of many was a tire plant that was lifted bodily from the Ford Company's River Rouge Plant and transferred to the USSR.
the USSR helped HitIer's Germany come to power and allied with them in 1939 to help invade Poland from 2 sides, MEMORANDUM ON THE GERMAN-SOVIET COMMERCIAL AGREEMENT SIGNED ON FEBRUARY 11, 1940
The Agreement is based on the correspondence-mentioned in the preamble-between the Reich Minister for Foreign Affairs and the Chairman of the Council of People's Commissars, Molotov, dated September 28, 1939. The Agreement represents the first great step toward the economic program envisaged by both sides and is to be followed by others.
The Agreement covers a period of 27 months, i. e., the Soviet deliveries, which are to be made within 18 months.
The Soviet deliveries. According to the Agreement, the Soviet Union shall within the first 12 months deliver raw materials in the amount of approximately 500 million Reichsmarks.
In addition, the Soviets will deliver raw materials, contemplated in the Credit Agreement of August 19, 1939, for the same period, in the amount of approximately 100 million Reichsmarks.
The most important raw materials are the following:
1,000,000 tons of grain for cattle, and of legumes, in the amount of 120 million Reichsmarks
900,000 tons of mineral oil in the amount of approximately 115 million Reichsmarks
100,000 tons of cotton in the amount of approximately 90 million Reichsmarks
500,000 tons of phosphates
100,000 tons of chrome ores
500,000 tons of iron ore
300,000 tons of scrap iron and pig iron
2,400 kg. of platinum Manganese ore, metals, lumber, and numerous other raw materials.
To this must also be added the Soviet exports to the Protectorate, which are not included in the Agreement, in the amount of about 50 million Reichsmarks so that the net deliveries of goods from the Soviet Union during the first treaty year amount to a total of 650 million Reichsmarks.
In addition, there are other important benefits. On the basis of the correspondence of September 28, 1939, the Soviet Union had granted us the right of transit to and from Romania, Iran, and Afghanistan and the countries of the Far East, which is particularly important in view of the German soybean purchases from Manchukuo. The freight rates of the Trans-Siberian Railroad were reduced by 50 percent for soybeans. The transit freight charges are to be settled by a clearing system and amount to approximately 100 million Reichsmarks.
Adding certain other items, it may be assumed that during the first 12 months Soviet deliveries and services will amount to a total of about 800 million Reichsmarks.
Thus far, only part of the Soviet deliveries has been fixed for the second treaty year. During the first 6 months of the second treaty year the Soviet Union will deliver to Germany 230 million Reichsmarks worth of raw materials of the same kind as in the first treaty year. It is contemplated that negotiations will be resumed before the expiration of the first treaty year and the quantities for the exchange of goods for the second treaty year fixed and even increased beyond the volume of the first treaty year.
The German deliveries comprise industrial products, industrial processes and installations as well as war materiel. The Soviet deliveries of the first 12 months are to be compensated by us within 15 months. The Soviet deliveries of the first 6 months of the second treaty year (13th to 18th month) are to be compensated by us within 12 months (from the 16th to the 27th month).
Among the Soviet deliveries within the first 18 months are 11,000 tons of copper, 3,000 tons of nickel, 950 tons of tin, 500 tons of molybdenum, 500 tons of wolfram, 40 tons of cobalt.
The Agreement means a wide open door to the East for us. The raw material provided by the Soviet Union and from the countries bordering the Soviet Union can still be considerably increased. But it is essential to meet the German commitments to the extent required. In view of the great volume this will require a special effort. If we succeed in extending and expanding exports to the East in the required volume, the effects of the English blockade will be decisively weakened by the incoming raw materials.
BERLIN, February 26, 1940.
@@UserName-om6ft =да, Россия была частью союзной коалиции, поэтому Россия проиграла Наполеону в первых 5 коалиционных войнах и французских революционных войнах Россия победила Наполеона только один раз, Наполеон победил Россию 5 раз в первых 5 коалиционных войнах=
эт верно.. западные "союзники" это такое дерьмо, с которым лучше не связываться- проиграешь
уж лучше когда они все вместе с наполеоном, всей европой против тебя... не ждешь ножа в спину
=Франция разгром России в Крымской войне 1856 г.=
там кроме франции больше ни кого не было? точно? )))
и только в крыму дело было? ни на дальнем востоке, ни на камчатке, ни в белом море, ни в балтике? ни против пруссии не надо было в польше держать войска? )))
у вас не память, а дуршлаг...
или вы намеренно пытаетесь (неудачно) лгать ;)
=и грандиозное унижение русско-австрийской армии при Аустерлице в 1805 г., Бородино 1812 г. особенно доказывает, что Наполеон мог бы завоевать Россию, если бы не холодная погода=
если вы хотели мне еще раз продемонстрировать нацизм, которым заряжены "цивилизованные" европейцы и англосаксы..
только забыли сделать "ручкой" от сердца к солнцу, когда начали рассказывать про русских варваров, которым плевать на холода
не стесняйтесь... вы так хотели...
мог бы.. если бы не климат, дороги...
плохому танцору яйца мешают )))
а русские тут жили и живут. в этом климате. в этих расстояниях.
а вы даже прийти пограбить нормально не смогли... неоднократно не смогли )))
=Зима 1941 г. и зима 1942 г. спасли СССР от разрушения=
как же зима могла спасти, если план Барбаросса был рассчитан до сентября месяца? )))
=ошибаюсь, только 60-70% немецких убитых было на восточном
фронте и еще меньше, если посчитать общие потери, включая пленные=
больше трех четвертей вермахта уничтожила ркка
а пленные в 45-ом году радостно бежали к своим создателям близким по духу
вы потом еще нацистов радостно пристраивали в разные места... от начальников нато до "журналистов" на свои сми. или в ракетную программу в штатах.,
=западные союзники разгромили лучшего генерала Германии Роммеля и выгнали его из Африки=
))) лучшего... лишь по тому что вы были худшими
вас гоняли две танковые дивизии ссаной тряпкой два года ))
=СССР победил под Москвой в 40 г. -50% танков в битве под Москвой пришли с запада, не только американский ленд-лиз, но и британский ленд-лиз спас СССР=
))) идиот!!!
битва под москвой это декабрь 41-январь 42 года
не "50% танков", а менее 50 танков (из тысячи участвовавших в той битве)
только британских. купленных за золото, а не по ленд-лизу.
по ленд-лизу, за октябрь-ноябрь было всего поставлено 182 штуки.
которые сразу пошли в ремонт-доукомплектование
=большая часть британского ленд-лиза пришлась на 1941 год=
тут важно не путать ленд-лиз с торговыми закупками
соглашение о ленд-лизе было подписано лишь в октябре 41 года
=, а большая часть американского ленд-лиза пришлась на лето и осень 1941 года=
80% американского лендлиза поступила в ссср с конца 43 по лето 45 года
=. В 1942 и позднее 1943 годах немцы начали сдавать позиции только в начале 1943 года.=
немцы были впервые понесли стратегическое поражение в 41 году под москвой
перелом войны произошел под сталинградом
в июне-июле 43 (курская дуга) года немцы полностью потеряли стратегическую инициативу
=12 июля 1941 года, через несколько недель после вторжения Германии в СССР, было подписано англо-советское соглашение, и первый британский конвой с гуманитарной помощью отправился по опасному морскому маршруту в Мурманск и прибыл в сентябре. На нем было 40 самолетов Hawker Hurricanes, а также 550 механиков и пилотов 151-го крыла в операции «Бенедикт» для обеспечения противовоздушной обороны порта и обучения советских пилотов. Конвой был первым из многих конвоев в Мурманск и Архангельск, которые стали известны как арктические конвои. К концу 1941 года первые поставки «Матильды», «Валентайна» и «Тетрарха» составляли от 40 до 50% танков, которые Советы использовали в битве под Москвой.=
конвой дервиш прибыл в архангельск 31.08-01.09
за грузы заплачено золотом
в битве под москвой участвовало менее 50 британских танков
из, приблизительно, 1000 штук
@@UserName-om6ft =Начиная с 1941 года, США поставили в Советский Союз 427 284 грузовика, 13 303 танка, 35 170 мотоциклов, 2 328 машин артиллерийского обслуживания, 2 670 371 тонну нефтепродуктов (бензина и нефти) или 57,8 процента авиационного топлива, в том числе почти 90 процентов высокосортного. использовано октановое топливо=
бензин шел на американские же самолеты
=4478116 тонн пищевых продуктов (мясные консервы, сахар, мука, соль и др.), 1911 паровозов, 66 тепловозов, 9920 платформ, 1000 думпкаров, 120 цистерн, 35 вагонов тяжелой техники. Поставленные боеприпасы (боеприпасы, артиллерийские снаряды, мины, различные взрывчатые вещества) составили 53 процента от общего внутреннего потребления.=
боеприпасы по лендлизу ссср получал к импортной технике, полученной по лендлизу
=Типичным для многих объектом был шинный завод, который был полностью вывезен из завода компании Ford в Ривер-Руж и передан СССР.=
еще нефтезаводы получали
=СССР помог гитлеровской Германии прийти к власти=
??? что?!!! ))))
прийти или не прийти к власти германии?)))
...могли лишь те, кто на правах победителей 1 мировой войны в версале разделил германию, ограничил ее армию и флот, клялся сдерживать германский потенциал, получал с германии репарации.
=...и вступил с ней в союз в 1939 году, чтобы помочь вторжению в Польшу с двух сторон.=
э... вы про то, что британия, франция, польша, "вступили в союз с германией, что бы помочь ей во вторжении..." в чехословакию, в 38 году? )))
давайте еще вашей травы! ))
пока ссср с 37 по 39 год воевал с германией, италией, фашистской испанией и японией, версальские гаранты сдерживания германии: заливали германию кредитами, технологиями, промышленными предприятиями, золотом, целыми европейскими промышленно-развитыми странами, разрушали созданные ссср антигитлеровские союзы.
разумеется учителя, покровители и создатели гитлера, ни когда не простят сталину, что тот обманул обманщиков, вырастивших бешенного пса против ссср (как сейчас украину против россии)... и заставил этого пса хватить хозяина за руку )))
разумеется хозяева учителя и симпатизанты фашистов, ни когда не простят что ссср натравил их голема на них самих ))
вы это хотели написать? ))
когда ссср начал свой освободительный поход, "польша" уже была в румынии ))
очень сложно "нападать с двух сторон" в румынию ))
но вой хозяев адольфа понятен... их детищу пришлось дважды завоевывать западную украину )))
= МЕМОРАНДУМ О ГЕРМАНСКО-СОВЕТСКОМ ТОРГОВОМ СОГЛАШЕНИИ, ПОДПИСАННЫЙ 11 ФЕВРАЛЯ 1940 ГОДА.
...
Наиболее важным сырьем является следующее:
1 000 000 тонн зерна для крупного рогатого скота и бобовых на сумму 120 миллионов рейхсмарок.=
кормовое зерно... страшня подмога гитлеру
то ли дело - заводы форда, давшие тяжелые грузовики
=900 000 тонн нефтепродуктов на сумму примерно 115 миллионов рейхсмарок.=
что гораздо меньше чем германия могла бы захватить в польше и прибалтике
можете дальше страдать про "союз с гитлером" )))
=К этому следует добавить еще советский экспорт в Протекторат, который не включен в Соглашение, на сумму около 50 миллионов рейхсмарок, так что чистые поставки товаров из Советского Союза в течение первого договорного года составят в общей сложности 650 миллионов рейхсмарок. =
а можно подобную справку о торговых отношениях сша и третьего рейха за этот период?
а за предыдущий? ))))
про то как отдали золото чехословакиии гитлеру, на какую сумму будет информация? ))
=Кроме того, есть и другие важные преимущества. На основании переписки от 28 сентября 1939 года Советский Союз предоставил нам право транзита в Румынию, Иран, Афганистан и страны Дальнего Востока и обратно, что особенно важно ввиду немецких закупок сои. из Маньчжоу-Го. Провозные ставки Транссибирской магистрали на соевые бобы снижены на 50 процентов. Расходы на транзитные перевозки подлежат расчету по клиринговой системе и составляют примерно 100 миллионов рейхсмарок.=
не было ни какой "переписки от 28 сентября 1939 года"
был договор о друж
=Если добавить к этому некоторые другие статьи, то можно предположить, что в течение первых 12 месяцев советские поставки и услуги составят в общей сложности около 800 миллионов рейхсмарок.=
немецкие поставки в ссср превосходили обратное "течение" ))
можно об этом информацию? нет?!! в вашей методичке про это не сказано? ))) удивительно! ))))
а "добавлять" и "предполагать", это синоним "высосать из пальца"?.. да, да, да... того самого )))
Volga, the German army was separated by 2 rows of houses, 2 houses each...
the numbers here destroy the myth of the ussr's overwhelming numbers being a key factor in their success; it wasn't until after 1943 that the russians really gained an edge in terms of raw numbers
Even this video exagerates the numbers. They’ve included the civilians on the soviet side.
Without the civilians it’s 1.5 mil to 1.5 mil. So it’s a 1 to 1 loss ratio.
@@ArmaDino22you kinda have to include the citizen militias no?
this battle is a true evidence that your allies can be the reason of your defeat
The Romanian troops didn't have anti-tank equipment to be able to defend their lines from the Soviets.
No
It’s evidence that it is CRIMINALLY easy to point the finger at someone
(There’s a lot of that in ww2 Germany)
Even though Germany promised to deliver anti tank to romanians to stop such a thing from happening, but just never did?
If it were Germans, they would still get steamrolled, like they did everywhere else after this battle
question... HOW DO YOU DO THIS ITS AMAZING!
AND THEY SHALL NOT PASS!
People want a indepth lengthy version of this should check out TIKhistory's 51 episode series. Though based on that series, he points out the 6th Army was given very little if any reinforcements after they reached the city primarily do to resource shortages and also do to a rivalry between General Halder and General Paulus. ie Halder prioritized other fronts over sending reinforcements to Stalingrad, surprisingly even Hitler did, as Stalingrad was actually a side show. German high command unlike the common misconception believed Paulus should be able to take the city with the forces he had, even if it took longer than they planned.
So seeing repeated long columns of divisions marching in like this video shows is likely not accurate at all.
Times when the average soldier's life in Stalingrad was only 15 minutes...
Hey bro
Look at those two patches of Romanian flags on the left and right flank. The Soviet High Command place mobile reserves in those sectors.
Слава Советскому народу, народу-победителю!
Glory to Soviet countries' independence
@@Georgia_Sakartvelo It must be bad for you to live with mental retardation?
@@Georgia_Sakartvelo he literally just congratulated every country in ussr for winning the war ?
🤮
the people who needed Lend Lease to win the war otherwise USSR would be speaking German
Hello, which tools are you using? Nice channel
So, Soviets smashed through Romanian section and encircled german forces...
they gathered such a large buildup of forces there that they would've smashed anything in that position.
@@abanomex9038 how large?
@@abanomex9038 its not the large buildup of soviet forces but rather the fact that romanian troops were poorly supplied and lacked anti tank weapons and artillery (also most of the army was still equiped with bolt action rifles but i think that was still the case for the germans and soviet at that time)
Awesome 👌
Can you do the Liberation of Paris next?
Great work 👏👏🔥🔥
More people died in the battle for Stalingrad than in the battles for France, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Norway combined.
That isn't true. I know you heard it in a video but it's not true.
@joshntn37111 the Germans barely lost anything on those
It's infact true
@@joshntn37111 its actually more than the combined german losses in western front
Да здравствует наша славная Родина, ее свобода, ее независимость!
GLORIA ETERNA AL EJERCITO ROJO DE OBREROS Y CAMPESINOS !
From the video it seems the first major breakthrough by the Soviet troops was made at the area where the Romanians were the main force?
You seem to be saying it's all romanians' fault. Did same happen to Napoleon?
@@fungames24 You are way too sensitive! I just want to learn more about what happened historically after watching the video! Come on!!
@@py8554 The Romanians didn't have the proper anti-tank equipment. The Germans knew that.
@@AlexanderTheFarmer anyways, Spain did what Romania didn't in the front.
@@Pikatiiuu You just ignore the truth lol, and you wonder why Europe is gonna become another Caliphate soon ?
The Germans: almost capture the city
Romanians on the flanks: it's time for me to be lucky
It's almost like they had been asking Germany for anti tank equipment that never came even when promised. Romanians acted smart, it was once again the fault of german high command.
They did capture it. Why is this confusing the city is east of the river they took it. then got encircled in it.
“Even when we killed three; there were ten more to take their place… it was an endless sea of red.”
Where did you get those numbers from bro
All of his sources are from Wikipedia.
@kamarempire6277BC yeah they don't say 2.6 million soviet casualties.
@@360NoScope-nm3lh It does.
@kamarempire6277BC they said 1.3 million half of which are sick he also chose the highest overestimated number of casualties 2.6 million which has been proven false by many historians.
@360NoScope-nm3lh Proven false, while yes its definitly false, you just gave the answer to your question. He uses the highest estimate out there from *wikipedia*
Good work👍🏻
Откуда это взято, Германия несла те же потери что и СССР, местами больше особенно в Сталинграде.
~8,6 миллионов советских военных потерь в ВОВ
И ~5,2-6,3 миллионов со стороны Германии, почувствуй разницу
Не забывай ось@@СпонсорОбсирателей
@user-kw9zh8ui1j без румынской нефти немцы и до Смоленска бы не добрались
@@СпонсорОбсирателей a 5:9 ratio isnt a big difference, and most of the heavy losses were suffered during first and half years of fighting.
Это выдумка твоя из ниоткуда, если бы у СССР было на 3 млн больше потерь он бы не выиграл, гораздо убедительнее звучит, что немуы потеряли больше@@СпонсорОбсирателей
This city is not Kursk, nor is it Kiev, nor Minsk. This city... is Stalingrad. STALINGRAD! This city bears the name of the Boss. It's more than a city, it's a symbol.
Love that movie
No one cared about symbols.Stalingrad was very important part of the supply line.
romanian army be like: it was not my fault 😂
No it was not our fault. We were poorly equipped and practically asking the Germans for anti tank weapons and artillery since the beginning of the battle (they didn’t provide)
@darius_alex2043 then why did your country betrayed Germany
People say Germany lost the war because the battle of Stalingrad was too costly. This is not true. Most battles lost in 1942 and 1943 were due to running low on fuel and ammo. If Germany had good supply lines they could have bounced back from Stalingrad just like the Soviets bounced back from the Rhzev meat grinder. The battle of the bulge failed for the same reason
Hitler didn't give the Hungarian and Romanian Armies anti tank weapons that's why they lost also operation uranus
how u doing videos like that?
Look at casualties
They are greatly exaggerated (I notice this with this author more than once)
@@jag0tocausalities aren’t fatalities
@@jag0to how?
@@jag0to oh i noticed that at the start of the video he just doubled the nazi casualties to the soviets.
Yuro, make a detailed guide on mapping, the first guide is not very clear
fml Romania you had one job
how did you make that?
Вот он, перелом войны.
Да, но в это время также шла операция у Ржева.
@@eluosi8236от туда немцы просто отступили
💬Потери России в Украине ликвидированными и ранеными составляют около 450 тысяч человек.
Об этом сообщает The Insider со ссылкой на заместителя государственного секретаря по вооружённым силам Великобритании Лео Догерти
@@K4C17S5F2 пон
@@K4C17S5F2 4,5 млн!!!!
Zhukov was a pure genius.
Glory to Sowjets who defeat European fascism!
Claro, aunque tambien no lo hubieran podido lograr de no ser por el prestamo y arriendo, y que Alemania haya estado desviando recursos a otros frentes contra Reino Unido y Estados Unidos. Hay que reconocer a todos por igual, la URSS es la protagonista de la derrota alemana pero tambien hay que reconocer la aportacion occidental, comentarios cargados de ideologias, no, porfavor.
@@cvvv111 Lend lease was really small or insignificant.
@@thefumyandthechev equipo especializado para la industria ayudo a que un t-34 se fabricara en torno a 3 veces mas rapido y barato, la URSS tenia una industria pobre, los asesores estadounidenses ayudaron en mucho a la indistria sovietica, sin contar los millones de suministros, vias ferreas, el 90% del material ferroviario de la URSS durante toda la guerra fue entregado por USA, la URSS solo fabricando un 10%, como te digo la industria sovietica era pobre, 1 vs 1 la URSS no le ganaba a Alemania, reconocimiento a todos los aliados que aportaron a la derrota alemana.
@@cvvv111 speak English
@@thefumyandthechev entendiste mi otro comentario pero no este? Bueno, adios
Romania: "I aim to please, but my aim ain't good!"
0:37 that one romanian divisoin got trapped
Is there any details about this?
@@SuddenStrike_HQ yeah, that's the 3rd and 4th Romanian army, they were regarded as being our best forces and consisted of about 200k troops, at the end of the encirclement they weren't given any mercy since they were among the last to surrender, those who survived were sent to gulags in Siberia and while a few would return, most of them died either at stalingrad or in Siberia. And that's considered our greatest military loss ever, the casualties were so high, never had we lost so many soldiers before and probably never will.
@@dimitri6171 I mean I can't feel bad but damn.
@@Orcram yeah me neither, while we had to invade the soviets to take back our territories, any advancements outside of our original territories were just plain greedy, while I do feel bad for the common soldiers who joined the army to take back our lands and then suddenly found themselves fighting in stalingrad
@@dimitri6171 I am a communist and have researched a lot of what the soviets did pre ww2 and most of it seems logical. The soviets tried to create a defensive pact with Britain and France and when that failed they signed a nonaggression pact with the Germans with a clause to divide poland, which the Soviets assumed would happen in 1941-1942 period. But then when the germans invaded poland one day after the soviets signed the deal the Soviets had to quickly organize a disorganized force to send into poland. Then you got the Soviets trying to push the finnish border back from leningrad to prevent an easy capture. And then (for a reason I don't understand) the Soviets blatantly annexed Bessarabia. I do not understand the economic, political, or strategic goal the Soviets had in mind when taking Bessarabia. All it did was Piss the Romanian people off.
how do you make these?
I'm proud of being Russian
любой, кто посмеет диктовать нам свои условия - огребёт
people have already dictated their terms to the Russians and the Russians agreed and conceded
Mongolian invasion 1241
Polish conquer Moscow 1610
Crimean war 1856
Russo-Japanese war 1905
WW1 Eastern Front 1918 treaty of Brest-Litovsk
Cold War 1991
@@UserName-om6ft =люди уже продиктовали свои условия русским и русские согласились и уступили
Монгольское вторжение 1241 г.=
вам напомнить где границы золотой орды, а где нынешние границы россии? ))
=Поляки покоряют Москву 1610 г.=
вам напомнить как закончили те поляки? ))
=Крымская война 1856 г.=
=Русско-японская война 1905 года.=
не вижу японцев ни в манчжурии, ни в корее ни во владивостоке ))
на сахалине, кстати, тоже ))
=Восточный фронт Первой мировой войны, Брест-Литовский договор 1918 г.=
о да!
кстати, тогда РИ танцевала под условия франции и британии... добровольно
а германию вынесли на кулачках и через полгода договор в бресте перестал действовать, если не знали ))
=Холодная война 1991 года=
тоже верно
и теперь вы видите куда вас привел ваш обман, когда вы обманули нас, подписав договор об окончании холодной войны но не прекратив ее против нас.
@@ДмитрийТрудов-х7к Russia defeated Mongolia only 1 time, Mongolia defeated Russia in the 1st invasion 1223 Kalka river, main invasion in 1241, Pyana River 1377, and Siege of Moscow 1382, Poland was able to defeat Russia more times than Russia could defeat Poland, Russia also has no victories over Japan while Japan annihilated Russia in 1905 even humiliated your navy, the US defeated Japan in 1945 and saved the USSR from Germany, in WW1 Germany lost to the Western Entente but they crushed Russia on the Eastern Front, the USSR correctly fell apart in 1991 ending the cold war with Western victory, as it should be, Western hegemony and capitalism must prevail, downfall of communism was the greatest gift to humanity and when the Russian Federation collapses again here in the modern time period it will be even greater for humanity
@@UserName-om6ft = Россия победила Монголию только 1 раз, Монголия победила Россию в 1-м вторжении 1223 г. Река Калка, главное вторжение в 1241 г., река Пьяна 1377 г. и осада Москвы 1382 г. =
ага... если не учитывать, что на 11 век "монголия"=китай+персия+турция+средняя азия+кавкац...
лишь три причины того, что "монголия" не дошла до "лиссабона":
смерть императора, сопротивление русских в тылу, выполнили завевт императора дойдя до "моря на западе" - андриатики
=Польша смогла победить Россию больше раз, чем Россия смогла победить Польшу=
))))) до польша побеждала до полного своего исчезновения
вы несее такую крутую чушь ))
=Россия также не имеет побед над Японией=
у вас забавный глобус на котором капитуляцию япония не подписывала на "миссури"? ))
=, в то время как Япония уничтожила Россию в 1905 году, даже унизила ваш флот, США победили Японию в 1945 году=
в каком месте "победили"? )))
уничтожив материковую базу японии с производством и сырьем? ))
где "победили"? на море? )) не высаживаясь на сами острова или на материк? ))
= и спасли СССР от Германии, в Первой мировой войне=
ссср в первой мировой войне? )))))
где вы берете такую траву? ))
= Германия проиграла Западной Антанте, но они разгромили Россию на Восточном фронте=
)))) вы только что написали про "спасли".. как же "спасли" если "разгромили"? )))
вам бы определиться с той чушью что вы несете ))
и потом, вы забыли как "западная антанта" вместе с восточной пошла грабить и убивать россию... и была выпнута из ее территории.. вся антанта... от японии до китая, и до сша, британии и франции (всего - больше десятка государств)
=, СССР правильно пал кроме завершения холодной войны победой Запада в 1991 году=
ну да.. когда подписываем равный мир, а потом нарушаем все его условия, это "правильно"...
именно по этому правильно, что лжецы сша и их подстилки теперь ни кому не нужны и вам ни кто не верит
и теперь вы идете к черту стройными рядами
=, как и должно быть, западная гегемония и капитализм должны восторжествовать, падение коммунизма было величайшим подарком человечеству=
дадада... вечная война всех против всех, ограбление сильного слабым, войны и убийства, терроризм и госперевороты и все ради прибыли сша... это "воссторжествововать.." и "величайший подарок человечеству"...
только не человечеству и главным убийцам и грабителям мира - западным олигархам.. чьей шлюхой ты и тебе подобные являются
=, и когда Российская Федерация снова рухнет здесь, в современный период времени, это будет еще больше для человечества=
твое "человечество" это твои хозяева- убийцы и грабители, изобретатели фашизма, нацизма, концлагерей, расизма в пределах всего земного шара.. и твоя и их ложь уже не поможет вам удержаться на вершине этой гнойной системы войн, грабежа, убийств, коррупции и террора
ваши хозяева уже взвешены и сочтены легкими
@@ДмитрийТрудов-х7к Mongolia humiliated Russia 4 times, Poland only disappear because of Germany, Austria, and Prussia, when Russia didnt have its allies the Polish always won, yes Japan surrender to the US on the Missouri the US is the one who defeated Japan not the USSR, the US did not save the USSR in WW1 i said the US saved the USSR from Germany from WW2, Russia straight up lost to Germany in WW1 and would have lost again in WW2 if not for the US and the West, the communists failed in the late 1910s and 1920s, Russia lost to Germany in WW1 on the eastern front in 1918 treaty of Brest-Litovsk, Russia lost to Poland in the failed Soviet westwards offensives in 1919, Russia lost to Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia in their wars for independence in 1919 and 1920, Russia lost to Georgia in the Georgian-Ossetian conflict in 1920, Russia lost to Poland in the Soviet-Polish war in 1921, Russia lost to Turkey in the Turkish war of independence in 1922, Russia lost to Afghanistan in the Urtatagi conflict in 1926, Russia lost to Afghanistan in the failed red army intervention in Afghanistan in 1929 etc... Russia is the terrorist of the world, Russia invades and kills civilians in Ukraine, Georgia, Chechnya, Syria, Dagestan, your USSR ally with Nazi Germany to invade Poland from 2 sides Molotov-Ribbentrop pact, Russian war crimes in central African republic, Mali, also the Holodomor, Russia kiIIs civilians in Goloshchekin genocide, how the USSR kiIIed civilians when they entered Germany and Berlin, Gulags and Soviet concentration camps, Katyn massacre, the US and the west fights for democracy, human rights, and the grand world order we are the good guys of the earth, Russia has always been evil and we will fight to the last drop of blood to eradicate your poison ideology and your fascist, imperialist anti western views
What is it called ?
So Germans mistake was relying on Romanians
Never Trust Romania
Especially with your stuff
You sound like a Nazi, this was what the Nazis said when they lost this battle when it was completely their fault.
Their mistake was not equipping the Romanians to be able to deal with the Soviets.
What many people seem to not realise is that romanian political and military leadership had constantly been asking Germany to provide anti tank equipment for the romanians on the flanks. The German High Command said yes, and yes whenever they were asked for this equipment since around the start of the battle, but they never provided the romanians with it.
их ошибка была что вообще напали На СССР! вы хоть посмотрите на размеры этой страны и Европы ))
Are we going to talk about how bad the Soviet’s got whipped I mean they lost 1.2 million more solders then the nazis that is embarrassing
they had meat and not equipment so they threw meat in the meatgrinder to stall for time till they had prepared enough equipment to bite back and that resulted in the encirclement. It wouldn't have worked if Stalin didn't have an iron grip on entire Russia.
@@AwoudeX you mean the supreme soviet had a iron grip after the purges. Stalin was not a dictator. He didn't have total control.
Are we going to talk about germans inability to adapt to the cold environment in Russia? Russians didn't drive the germans away. It was the weather.
@@fastdrumming вы интеллектуально неполноценны ?
Official sources, the losses of the USSR are 1,129,619, the axis losses are about 1,500,000. The creator of the video is a liar