Back and forth between Ableton and Reaper , maybe I can adding request about auto read 3rdParty parameters so creating macro in rack much easier ( without need to configure first then doing mapping macro in rack )
Because he prefers Ableton? He just asking for improvement on a couple things that clearly would be an improvement. Just make it an option and let people decide.
the main problem with fl studio is the windows. It doesn’t have snap in place with the mixer. That’s why most engineers don’t like fl and use logic or ableton cause of how fast it is with the mixer view and a more simple side chain. Think of studio one as a better pro tools. Think of fl studio as its own daw. Most people that mix records use pro tools cause it’s industry compatible. But with studio one everything is so simple to setup if that makes any sense. The main thing FL Studio needs and a snap in place for the mixer and have certain views of a pattern and track workflow. Or you can keep the pattern based workflow but the mixer window needs to be a lot more simpler it’s a huge learning curve to people that use other daws with a track workflow. Depends what you like better. FL Studio you can’t really compare it to anything cause not a lot of daws are like it.
I LOVE FL Studio. It was my first ever DAW. The reason why I’m choosing Live over FL is because FL tends to have more bug issues. It is less compatible with mac (compared to windows) & Live has proven to be the most stable, & I find the workflow on it very unique ;)
@@_jbustillo FL studios mixer is terrible I think pro tools and studio one is way more industry compatible compared to both ableton and FL. If your producing then choose any daw but the best overall for all in one has to be studio one. The only problem with pro tools is you can't use vst3 plugins in the daw. With logic it mainly uses au support which is kinda an issue. Once daws have the clap format it'll be much easier cause that's probaly the main issue right now with pro tools. Other then that it's amazing. Most people that hate on pro tools don't know how to use it. You gotta have one daw that you love, but be efficiant in pro tools cause every studio uses it. It's good for compatibility. And plus most mixing engineers are not mixing through stems anyway. There 99.9% of the time mixing through a pro tools template. Since the engineer already has pro tools it makes the artist and the engineer work together much better.
Back and forth between Ableton and Reaper , maybe I can adding request about auto read 3rdParty parameters so creating macro in rack much easier ( without need to configure first then doing mapping macro in rack )
those feature would be awesome if Ableton actually implementing it.
So why not just use FL over Ableton?
Because he prefers Ableton? He just asking for improvement on a couple things that clearly would be an improvement. Just make it an option and let people decide.
the main problem with fl studio is the windows. It doesn’t have snap in place with the mixer. That’s why most engineers don’t like fl and use logic or ableton cause of how fast it is with the mixer view and a more simple side chain. Think of studio one as a better pro tools. Think of fl studio as its own daw. Most people that mix records use pro tools cause it’s industry compatible. But with studio one everything is so simple to setup if that makes any sense. The main thing FL Studio needs and a snap in place for the mixer and have certain views of a pattern and track workflow. Or you can keep the pattern based workflow but the mixer window needs to be a lot more simpler it’s a huge learning curve to people that use other daws with a track workflow. Depends what you like better. FL Studio you can’t really compare it to anything cause not a lot of daws are like it.
I LOVE FL Studio. It was my first ever DAW. The reason why I’m choosing Live over FL is because FL tends to have more bug issues. It is less compatible with mac (compared to windows) & Live has proven to be the most stable, & I find the workflow on it very unique ;)
@@_jbustillo FL studios mixer is terrible I think pro tools and studio one is way more industry compatible compared to both ableton and FL. If your producing then choose any daw but the best overall for all in one has to be studio one. The only problem with pro tools is you can't use vst3 plugins in the daw. With logic it mainly uses au support which is kinda an issue. Once daws have the clap format it'll be much easier cause that's probaly the main issue right now with pro tools. Other then that it's amazing. Most people that hate on pro tools don't know how to use it. You gotta have one daw that you love, but be efficiant in pro tools cause every studio uses it. It's good for compatibility. And plus most mixing engineers are not mixing through stems anyway. There 99.9% of the time mixing through a pro tools template. Since the engineer already has pro tools it makes the artist and the engineer work together much better.
@@_jbustillo the workflow is unique but me personally I hate it