[ENG] ABSOLUTE 64 Fly - Review - The Boat Show

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 15

  • @Puzzoozoo
    @Puzzoozoo 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very nice of him to add that little tip at the end to bare in mind for a customer who test drives a flybridge boat.

  • @JoelOman1980
    @JoelOman1980 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Yes! Absolute Yachts knows their game! Is it possible to post a review for the Absolute 45 FLY as it seems to be the only Flybridge below 50 feet that has a flat floor between the galley and cockpit. (From what I've seen so far and I have studied some yachts, believe you me...) Thanks for another fantastic review, keep up the good work +The Boat Show

  • @kennethconnors7532
    @kennethconnors7532 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    checked every boat this size and this is the very best ,my choice

  • @jackhammer4656
    @jackhammer4656 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    So much better for long range cruising and comfort that the Sea Ray L650. No comparison!

  • @borg7312
    @borg7312 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome Boat !

  • @robertstancer4469
    @robertstancer4469 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    What a gorgeous boat. I want one, Quanto questa por favore?

  • @kleinbottled79
    @kleinbottled79 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I know nothing of boats like this. More into sailboats. But I'm curious about something. Its burning 10l per nm at all the speeds quoted. It has a 2400l tank. This gives a max range of ~240nm? So cruising at 25 knots you need gas every 10 hours or less? Am I doing some bad math, missing something, or does one really spend that much time at a pump in one of these?

    • @kleinbottled79
      @kleinbottled79 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Can one cruise at hull speed on one motor or something and get at least double that range? Seems so odd to have such a large vessel and be limited thusly.

  • @borg7312
    @borg7312 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome!

  • @khoatran9482
    @khoatran9482 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    When he says 9.7L fuel consumption is that per engine per hour?

    • @kingdavid7571
      @kingdavid7571 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Per mile. So it takes 10 u.s. dollars per mile at those speeds. Go out 300 miles, round trip it costs $6,000. But about a third of that at 8 knots per hour.

  • @rbbrame
    @rbbrame 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Not sure why the interpreter keep referring to the radar arch as the "roll bar" it bipothered me as I didn't if the captain was using that word or the interpreter was just misquoting- but there were s verbal other misquotes regarding performance- " planing at 11 knots" etc.....

    • @tacodias
      @tacodias 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      +Roger Brame That's because if this boat capsizes, the roll bar avoids the fly to be crushed... Thus the boat can be rolled over again!
      This channel is full of misquotes ;)

    • @ao5199
      @ao5199 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Roger Brame check out the Sirena 58