Kargil was separated from Kashmir against the wishes of both Kargil and Kashmir. Leh supported Union territory status but in the process lost their voice as well as their economy. More and more outsiders from outside the region are taking over their economy.
Very good program ma’am on Kashmir, Leh n Ladakh..lots of love n encouragement for bringing such good n knowledgeable program, from Assam India.. pl come n see till Arunachal Pradesh India also.. We welcome you all..
2 year working experience in Kashmir i feel and i thought what happened in 2019 is best thing happened for kargil . . I badly missing ladakh people’s . Whre you in Kashmir you have no respect and trusted ! Yah their more reason but thought concludes above
Half of my family including my mother has worked in Kashmir for years. They have the opposite thing to say. I personally know some kashmiris who are the most hospitable people. What happened in 2019 was a catastrophe for Kargil. Those in Leh who were dancing are now crying. So keep your personal prejudices to yourself.
It’s so sad that just because of religion people of Kargil refuse to accept their similarities with rest of Buddhist ladakhis. Their language and culture is similar but just because of islam they feel they are more connected with Kashmir.
Leh is also 50-50 muslim Buddhist. This is nothing related to religion. Also kargil takes decisions independently but it's more closer to leh than to Srinagar. There are numerous marriages between leh and Kargil. This women shows Kashmir side only
existence of the Instrument of Accession, as well as the date of its purported execution, are disputed), this brief summarizes what the Instrument of Accession is, why (if it exists) it is legally invalid and how it remains the basis of ongoing grave illegalities. India’s claim to sovereignty over Jammu and Kashmir is predicated on the legality and finality of an “instrument of accession” (the Instrument of Accession) purportedly signed by Hari Singh (scion of a remnant British colonial dynasty in Jammu and Kashmir) on October 26 or27, 1947, acceding Jammu and Kashmir to India on a limited (only with respect to certain matters) and conditional (subject to the exercise by the people of their right to self-determination) basis. While India initially accepted that the Instrument of Accession was not final and conditioned on ratification by a democratic referendum, India later claimed the Instrument of Accession is a valid, final treaty. The mere existence of the Instrument of Accession is disputed by authorities. If it does exist, it is legally void or invalid for several reasons,each dispositive in itself, including, among many others: § It was conditioned on ratification through a democratic referendum, which never occurred (actually, which India never permitted to occur); § Hari Singh did not have the capacity to deliver it because he did not control the territory of Jammu and Kashmir at the time of its execution; § Hari Singh did not have the capacity to the deliver it because he was not a legitimate sovereign (his claim to sovereignty was through an 1846 British colonial legal instrument that was null and void or invalidated); § Hari Singh did not have the authority to deliver it because he was a non-representative, autocratic ruler opposed by the vast majority of the population he claimed to represent and a repressive tyrant responsible for grave human rights violations and atrocity crimes, including ethnic cleansing and genocidal killings, against the population he claimed to represent; § Hari Singh did not have the authority to execute it because he had(prior to its execution) delegated his authority (through a standstill agreement with Pakistan); and § If it was actually executed, it was improperly executed. India’s claim to sovereignty over Jammu and Kashmir through the Instrument of Accession has never been recognized by any proper legal authority and has been rejected by the United Nations(including the Security Council) since 1948, when India first brought its dispute with Pakistan over Jammu and Kashmir to the UN. Despite basing its claim to sovereignty over Jammu and Kashmir on the Instrument of Accession, the India has repeatedly materially breached its terms. In August 2019, India went beyond its historic breaches by repudiating the Instrument of Accession altogether (see C.O. 273 of August 6,2019). India’s repeated, material violations and repudiation of the Instrument of Accession demonstrate that India itself views the purported legal instrument that is foundational to its claim to sovereignty over Jammu and Kashmir as invalid and/or non-binding. Still, the invalid Instrument of Accession is the legal cover invoked by India to legitimate its ongoing illegal occupation,annexation and colonization of Indian-administered Jammu and Kashmir and its government’s policy seeking to annex Pakistan-administered Jammu and Kashmir..................
Jammu kashmir k log aj b Kargil Ladakh ko aur Yaha k logo ko apna smjty hn hmary Liye ajj b Ladakh Alag nhi h ut bnanay se koi hmary dilo se Pyr KTM kr k hmy Dil SE Alag nhi kr skta. dusri states Alag hn lakhabnpur se agy aur Himachal Pradesh wagaira Alag state hn.jamm valley Ladakh ko hum ek he smjty hn
I live in Azad Jammu and Kashmir, the road from here to Srinagar is not open, it is closed by India, this line of control is made by India and Pakistan, due to which we cannot go to our other Kashmir, Kashmiri people.. 😢
Pakistan occupied kashmir kaisa lag raha hai wahan pr Bharat k log aapse acha ji rhe hai pure kashmir mein kargil mein tumhe Pakistan kya diya hai kuch nhi Pakistani tumhare resources kha rhe hai sare pok Bharat ka tha Bharat ka hai or hamesha Bharat ka hi rahega..yad rakhna
Pakistan bna 1947 mein. jammu kashmir ka maharaja the hindu. Jammu kashmir par phele attack Kiya Pakistan ki fauj ne. Pakistan ki fauj ne POK pr zabardasti kabza Kiya hua hai.. tumhe islam k naam pr pagal bna rhe hai Pakistani.. Jaa kr Lahore dekho sare tumhare resources khaa rahe hai Pakistani
Jammu kashmir belongs to bharat ye humare sir ka Taj hai agar islamic log na aate to aaj ye sab problem hi nahi hota na hi Pakistan banta na bangladesh banta nahi jammu kashmir mein koi problem khadi hoti
Aapko badgam area visit karna chahiye thaaa u will get the real picture of partition of 1947 ,1971 and how people suffered, still their dear ones are in Pakistan..............
Kargil wala jk state ka sath khush tha aur UT sirf leh walon ka demand tha aur kargil walon ko UT thopa gaya hai aur aj leh wala b roraha hai UT sa 370 aur 35 a sab sa best land aur job security tha ab 6th schedule maang raha hai job security hona chahye land security nhi hona chahye
existence of the Instrument of Accession, as well as the date of its purported execution, are disputed), this brief summarizes what the Instrument of Accession is, why (if it exists) it is legally invalid and how it remains the basis of ongoing grave illegalities. India’s claim to sovereignty over Jammu and Kashmir is predicated on the legality and finality of an “instrument of accession” (the Instrument of Accession) purportedly signed by Hari Singh (scion of a remnant British colonial dynasty in Jammu and Kashmir) on October 26 or27, 1947, acceding Jammu and Kashmir to India on a limited (only with respect to certain matters) and conditional (subject to the exercise by the people of their right to self-determination) basis. While India initially accepted that the Instrument of Accession was not final and conditioned on ratification by a democratic referendum, India later claimed the Instrument of Accession is a valid, final treaty. The mere existence of the Instrument of Accession is disputed by authorities. If it does exist, it is legally void or invalid for several reasons,each dispositive in itself, including, among many others: § It was conditioned on ratification through a democratic referendum, which never occurred (actually, which India never permitted to occur); § Hari Singh did not have the capacity to deliver it because he did not control the territory of Jammu and Kashmir at the time of its execution; § Hari Singh did not have the capacity to the deliver it because he was not a legitimate sovereign (his claim to sovereignty was through an 1846 British colonial legal instrument that was null and void or invalidated); § Hari Singh did not have the authority to deliver it because he was a non-representative, autocratic ruler opposed by the vast majority of the population he claimed to represent and a repressive tyrant responsible for grave human rights violations and atrocity crimes, including ethnic cleansing and genocidal killings, against the population he claimed to represent; § Hari Singh did not have the authority to execute it because he had(prior to its execution) delegated his authority (through a standstill agreement with Pakistan); and § If it was actually executed, it was improperly executed. India’s claim to sovereignty over Jammu and Kashmir through the Instrument of Accession has never been recognized by any proper legal authority and has been rejected by the United Nations(including the Security Council) since 1948, when India first brought its dispute with Pakistan over Jammu and Kashmir to the UN. Despite basing its claim to sovereignty over Jammu and Kashmir on the Instrument of Accession, the India has repeatedly materially breached its terms. In August 2019, India went beyond its historic breaches by repudiating the Instrument of Accession altogether (see C.O. 273 of August 6,2019). India’s repeated, material violations and repudiation of the Instrument of Accession demonstrate that India itself views the purported legal instrument that is foundational to its claim to sovereignty over Jammu and Kashmir as invalid and/or non-binding. Still, the invalid Instrument of Accession is the legal cover invoked by India to legitimate its ongoing illegal occupation,annexation and colonization of Indian-administered Jammu and Kashmir and its government’s policy seeking to annex Pakistan-administered Jammu and Kashmir.................
@@Dardistan_Kashmir Hello no such long n waste of time writing needed. Today Pakistan has become a complete Bhikharistan 😂😂😂 if self determination right is given to Pakistanis then they will side with Bharat that is India 🇮🇳 so forget about JnK.. Pakistan occupied Kashmiris today would be regretting already 😂😂😂😂😂
existence of the Instrument of Accession, as well as the date of its purported execution, are disputed), this brief summarizes what the Instrument of Accession is, why (if it exists) it is legally invalid and how it remains the basis of ongoing grave illegalities. India’s claim to sovereignty over Jammu and Kashmir is predicated on the legality and finality of an “instrument of accession” (the Instrument of Accession) purportedly signed by Hari Singh (scion of a remnant British colonial dynasty in Jammu and Kashmir) on October 26 or27, 1947, acceding Jammu and Kashmir to India on a limited (only with respect to certain matters) and conditional (subject to the exercise by the people of their right to self-determination) basis. While India initially accepted that the Instrument of Accession was not final and conditioned on ratification by a democratic referendum, India later claimed the Instrument of Accession is a valid, final treaty. The mere existence of the Instrument of Accession is disputed by authorities. If it does exist, it is legally void or invalid for several reasons,each dispositive in itself, including, among many others: § It was conditioned on ratification through a democratic referendum, which never occurred (actually, which India never permitted to occur); § Hari Singh did not have the capacity to deliver it because he did not control the territory of Jammu and Kashmir at the time of its execution; § Hari Singh did not have the capacity to the deliver it because he was not a legitimate sovereign (his claim to sovereignty was through an 1846 British colonial legal instrument that was null and void or invalidated); § Hari Singh did not have the authority to deliver it because he was a non-representative, autocratic ruler opposed by the vast majority of the population he claimed to represent and a repressive tyrant responsible for grave human rights violations and atrocity crimes, including ethnic cleansing and genocidal killings, against the population he claimed to represent; § Hari Singh did not have the authority to execute it because he had(prior to its execution) delegated his authority (through a standstill agreement with Pakistan); and § If it was actually executed, it was improperly executed. India’s claim to sovereignty over Jammu and Kashmir through the Instrument of Accession has never been recognized by any proper legal authority and has been rejected by the United Nations(including the Security Council) since 1948, when India first brought its dispute with Pakistan over Jammu and Kashmir to the UN. Despite basing its claim to sovereignty over Jammu and Kashmir on the Instrument of Accession, the India has repeatedly materially breached its terms. In August 2019, India went beyond its historic breaches by repudiating the Instrument of Accession altogether (see C.O. 273 of August 6,2019). India’s repeated, material violations and repudiation of the Instrument of Accession demonstrate that India itself views the purported legal instrument that is foundational to its claim to sovereignty over Jammu and Kashmir as invalid and/or non-binding. Still, the invalid Instrument of Accession is the legal cover invoked by India to legitimate its ongoing illegal occupation,annexation and colonization of Indian-administered Jammu and Kashmir and its government’s policy seeking to annex Pakistan-administered Jammu and Kashmir......................
We Kargil people don't want us to be associated with Kashmir. Please don't portray 1% of population as a narrative. Disgusting. We had a different status from leh regarding UT but we would associate ourselves more with leh rather than kashmir. Leh and Kargil are atleast peaceful and without any terrorist activity.
Bhut sukoon sa milta h jab buzrogun ke zman se qadim zmane ki tarekh byan hoti h , Aap ka bhut shokriya
Kargil was separated from Kashmir against the wishes of both Kargil and Kashmir. Leh supported Union territory status but in the process lost their voice as well as their economy. More and more outsiders from outside the region are taking over their economy.
Kashmir aur Ladakh inshallah phir se mil k ek State bny ga agr Yaha k log united ho k Koshish krain
Excellent people. Excellent culture and comprehensive information about kargil and other civilisations
Love from Ladakh vlogs ❤
Big fan of your vlogs sir
Thanks for the best documentary 🔥🔥
Wah kya maza hai is series mai
Mindblowing documentary.....❤❤❤❤❤
Abi tou apo bazar ban gya yeh 😅
Love from Kargil❤
😂
Bohot acha video tha
Very good program ma’am on Kashmir, Leh n Ladakh..lots of love n encouragement for bringing such good n knowledgeable program, from Assam India.. pl come n see till Arunachal Pradesh India also.. We welcome you all..
stunning program. Keep exploring...higly enlightening
Great vlogs and often very helpful!
Me From Bandipora, Kashmir
Studying at AMU ❤️
❤❤. Beautiful people,
Great..indepth analysis
Bohoot behtareen❤❤
2 year working experience in Kashmir i feel and i thought what happened in 2019 is best thing happened for kargil . . I badly missing ladakh people’s . Whre you in Kashmir you have no respect and trusted ! Yah their more reason but thought concludes above
Half of my family including my mother has worked in Kashmir for years. They have the opposite thing to say. I personally know some kashmiris who are the most hospitable people. What happened in 2019 was a catastrophe for Kargil. Those in Leh who were dancing are now crying.
So keep your personal prejudices to yourself.
❤nice documententry
Nice collection ❤
Informative video. Ghar bathay Ladhak ka sair kiya.......! Shukriya
We the kargilis are very happy by separating with kashmiris...
Kargil and kashir 🫶🤝
Mai ladakha sa ho k himichal paradesh gya ho both maza hai kargil leh ladakh mai
Work Hard ❤
Good vedio
It’s so sad that just because of religion people of Kargil refuse to accept their similarities with rest of Buddhist ladakhis. Their language and culture is similar but just because of islam they feel they are more connected with Kashmir.
no bro kargil has diverse cultures and ethnic groups like the shina and aryans of batalik region the have different cultures
Leh is also 50-50 muslim Buddhist. This is nothing related to religion. Also kargil takes decisions independently but it's more closer to leh than to Srinagar. There are numerous marriages between leh and Kargil. This women shows Kashmir side only
Jay Hind Jay Bharat❤❤❤❤❤🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳❤❤❤❤❤🙏🙏🙏🆗
🤡
existence of the Instrument of Accession, as well as the date of its purported execution, are disputed), this brief summarizes what the Instrument of Accession is, why (if it exists) it is legally invalid and how it remains the basis of ongoing grave illegalities.
India’s claim to sovereignty over Jammu and Kashmir is predicated on the legality and finality of an “instrument of accession” (the Instrument of Accession) purportedly signed by Hari Singh (scion of a remnant British colonial dynasty in Jammu and Kashmir) on October 26 or27, 1947, acceding Jammu and Kashmir to India on a limited (only with respect to certain matters) and conditional (subject to the exercise by the people of their right to self-determination) basis. While India initially accepted that the Instrument of Accession was not final and conditioned on ratification by a democratic referendum, India later claimed the Instrument of Accession is a valid, final treaty.
The mere existence of the Instrument of Accession is disputed by authorities. If it does exist, it is legally void or invalid for several reasons,each dispositive in itself, including, among many others:
§ It was conditioned on ratification through a democratic referendum, which never occurred (actually, which India never permitted to occur);
§ Hari Singh did not have the capacity to deliver it because he did not control the territory of Jammu and Kashmir at the time of its execution;
§ Hari Singh did not have the capacity to the deliver it because he was not a legitimate sovereign (his claim to sovereignty was through an 1846 British colonial legal instrument that was null and void or invalidated);
§ Hari Singh did not have the authority to deliver it because he was a non-representative, autocratic ruler opposed by the vast majority of the population he claimed to represent and a repressive tyrant responsible for grave human rights violations and atrocity crimes, including ethnic cleansing and genocidal killings, against the population he claimed to represent;
§ Hari Singh did not have the authority to execute it because he had(prior to its execution) delegated his authority (through a standstill agreement with Pakistan); and
§ If it was actually executed, it was improperly executed.
India’s claim to sovereignty over Jammu and Kashmir through the Instrument of Accession has never been recognized by any proper legal authority and has been rejected by the United Nations(including the Security Council) since 1948, when India first brought its dispute with Pakistan over Jammu and Kashmir to the UN. Despite basing its claim to sovereignty over Jammu and Kashmir on the Instrument of Accession, the India has repeatedly materially breached its terms. In August 2019, India went beyond its historic breaches by repudiating the Instrument of Accession altogether (see C.O. 273 of August 6,2019). India’s repeated, material violations and repudiation of the Instrument of Accession demonstrate that India itself views the purported legal instrument that is foundational to its claim to sovereignty over Jammu and Kashmir as invalid and/or non-binding. Still, the invalid Instrument of Accession is the legal cover invoked by India to legitimate its ongoing illegal occupation,annexation and colonization of Indian-administered Jammu and Kashmir and its government’s policy seeking to annex Pakistan-administered Jammu and Kashmir..................
Visit our beautiful suru valley mam plz
Visit suru valley ❤❤❤
Jammu kashmir k log aj b Kargil Ladakh ko aur Yaha k logo ko apna smjty hn hmary Liye ajj b Ladakh Alag nhi h ut bnanay se koi hmary dilo se Pyr KTM kr k hmy Dil SE Alag nhi kr skta. dusri states Alag hn lakhabnpur se agy aur Himachal Pradesh wagaira Alag state hn.jamm valley Ladakh ko hum ek he smjty hn
par ham Ladakh Wale nahi mantey thumay apna😂😂
Kargil (ladakh)
I Miss you Srinagar Jammu Kashmir. 😢💔
Keep missing..
❤❤❤
👍
👏👏👏👏
Ladakh was not part of j & k before Dogra attack, it's true
I live in Azad Jammu and Kashmir, the road from here to Srinagar is not open, it is closed by India, this line of control is made by India and Pakistan, due to which we cannot go to our other Kashmir, Kashmiri people.. 😢
Pakistan occupied kashmir kaisa lag raha hai wahan pr Bharat k log aapse acha ji rhe hai pure kashmir mein kargil mein tumhe Pakistan kya diya hai kuch nhi Pakistani tumhare resources kha rhe hai sare pok Bharat ka tha Bharat ka hai or hamesha Bharat ka hi rahega..yad rakhna
@@rishabhgulati2244 Vo Kashmir be Hamra h ... Jammu Kashmir State Parts .. Jammu, Kashmir, Gilgit Baltistan, Laddakh...
@@rishabhgulati2244 Both Country's India and Pakistan Terrorist.... ❌️❌️😡😡😡
Pakistan bna 1947 mein. jammu kashmir ka maharaja the hindu. Jammu kashmir par phele attack Kiya Pakistan ki fauj ne. Pakistan ki fauj ne POK pr zabardasti kabza Kiya hua hai.. tumhe islam k naam pr pagal bna rhe hai Pakistani.. Jaa kr Lahore dekho sare tumhare resources khaa rahe hai Pakistani
Jammu kashmir belongs to bharat ye humare sir ka Taj hai agar islamic log na aate to aaj ye sab problem hi nahi hota na hi Pakistan banta na bangladesh banta nahi jammu kashmir mein koi problem khadi hoti
🌈❤👍
Pehle bolte hain aur bht tarqee ho gya phir ek dm bolte hain tarqee toh kya ho gya😂😂
😂😂😂😂😂
Ak dam jazbat balde de halat badle dey 😂
Aapko badgam area visit karna chahiye thaaa u will get the real picture of partition of 1947 ,1971 and how people suffered, still their dear ones are in Pakistan..............
Where in Budgam?
@@humaira224810 kms from Kargil town
@@humaira2248 kargil badgam
@@iftikharaftab18 ok
kargil to Akchamal 2.5 kilometres 😅
Mangbore mahalla is the starting village of akchamal and it is 2.5 km ....
we people of ladakh arent kashmiris so please dont include ladakh or any part of it with kashmir thankyou
🤣🤣🤣
@drmasoodcriticalcare1188 is it funny
@@MyWrongyou part of Ladakh🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Kargil wala jk state ka sath khush tha aur UT sirf leh walon ka demand tha aur kargil walon ko UT thopa gaya hai aur aj leh wala b roraha hai UT sa 370 aur 35 a sab sa best land aur job security tha ab 6th schedule maang raha hai job security hona chahye land security nhi hona chahye
I love Jammu Kashmir State Peoples ❤.
existence of the Instrument of Accession, as well as the date of its purported execution, are disputed), this brief summarizes what the Instrument of Accession is, why (if it exists) it is legally invalid and how it remains the basis of ongoing grave illegalities.
India’s claim to sovereignty over Jammu and Kashmir is predicated on the legality and finality of an “instrument of accession” (the Instrument of Accession) purportedly signed by Hari Singh (scion of a remnant British colonial dynasty in Jammu and Kashmir) on October 26 or27, 1947, acceding Jammu and Kashmir to India on a limited (only with respect to certain matters) and conditional (subject to the exercise by the people of their right to self-determination) basis. While India initially accepted that the Instrument of Accession was not final and conditioned on ratification by a democratic referendum, India later claimed the Instrument of Accession is a valid, final treaty.
The mere existence of the Instrument of Accession is disputed by authorities. If it does exist, it is legally void or invalid for several reasons,each dispositive in itself, including, among many others:
§ It was conditioned on ratification through a democratic referendum, which never occurred (actually, which India never permitted to occur);
§ Hari Singh did not have the capacity to deliver it because he did not control the territory of Jammu and Kashmir at the time of its execution;
§ Hari Singh did not have the capacity to the deliver it because he was not a legitimate sovereign (his claim to sovereignty was through an 1846 British colonial legal instrument that was null and void or invalidated);
§ Hari Singh did not have the authority to deliver it because he was a non-representative, autocratic ruler opposed by the vast majority of the population he claimed to represent and a repressive tyrant responsible for grave human rights violations and atrocity crimes, including ethnic cleansing and genocidal killings, against the population he claimed to represent;
§ Hari Singh did not have the authority to execute it because he had(prior to its execution) delegated his authority (through a standstill agreement with Pakistan); and
§ If it was actually executed, it was improperly executed.
India’s claim to sovereignty over Jammu and Kashmir through the Instrument of Accession has never been recognized by any proper legal authority and has been rejected by the United Nations(including the Security Council) since 1948, when India first brought its dispute with Pakistan over Jammu and Kashmir to the UN. Despite basing its claim to sovereignty over Jammu and Kashmir on the Instrument of Accession, the India has repeatedly materially breached its terms. In August 2019, India went beyond its historic breaches by repudiating the Instrument of Accession altogether (see C.O. 273 of August 6,2019). India’s repeated, material violations and repudiation of the Instrument of Accession demonstrate that India itself views the purported legal instrument that is foundational to its claim to sovereignty over Jammu and Kashmir as invalid and/or non-binding. Still, the invalid Instrument of Accession is the legal cover invoked by India to legitimate its ongoing illegal occupation,annexation and colonization of Indian-administered Jammu and Kashmir and its government’s policy seeking to annex Pakistan-administered Jammu and Kashmir.................
@@Dardistan_Kashmir Hello no such long n waste of time writing needed. Today Pakistan has become a complete Bhikharistan 😂😂😂 if self determination right is given to Pakistanis then they will side with Bharat that is India 🇮🇳 so forget about JnK.. Pakistan occupied Kashmiris today would be regretting already 😂😂😂😂😂
Jammu n Kashmir has no relationship with Bhikharistan that is Pakistan 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@Arvindchauhan-qv6gd Stupid. Get out. ❌️😡
@@Arvindchauhan-qv6gdright bro """""""Bhikharistan"""""""🥴🥴🥴🥴🥴😫😫😫😫
Madam suru valley mai dekhlo
I was recently in kargil
There is nothing only Sand and open mountains
don't compare kargil with our beautiful country kashmir
Who is comparing atanwadi and peace loving people..
@fadedsoul6127 😂
kargil ladakh
existence of the Instrument of Accession, as well as the date of its purported execution, are disputed), this brief summarizes what the Instrument of Accession is, why (if it exists) it is legally invalid and how it remains the basis of ongoing grave illegalities.
India’s claim to sovereignty over Jammu and Kashmir is predicated on the legality and finality of an “instrument of accession” (the Instrument of Accession) purportedly signed by Hari Singh (scion of a remnant British colonial dynasty in Jammu and Kashmir) on October 26 or27, 1947, acceding Jammu and Kashmir to India on a limited (only with respect to certain matters) and conditional (subject to the exercise by the people of their right to self-determination) basis. While India initially accepted that the Instrument of Accession was not final and conditioned on ratification by a democratic referendum, India later claimed the Instrument of Accession is a valid, final treaty.
The mere existence of the Instrument of Accession is disputed by authorities. If it does exist, it is legally void or invalid for several reasons,each dispositive in itself, including, among many others:
§ It was conditioned on ratification through a democratic referendum, which never occurred (actually, which India never permitted to occur);
§ Hari Singh did not have the capacity to deliver it because he did not control the territory of Jammu and Kashmir at the time of its execution;
§ Hari Singh did not have the capacity to the deliver it because he was not a legitimate sovereign (his claim to sovereignty was through an 1846 British colonial legal instrument that was null and void or invalidated);
§ Hari Singh did not have the authority to deliver it because he was a non-representative, autocratic ruler opposed by the vast majority of the population he claimed to represent and a repressive tyrant responsible for grave human rights violations and atrocity crimes, including ethnic cleansing and genocidal killings, against the population he claimed to represent;
§ Hari Singh did not have the authority to execute it because he had(prior to its execution) delegated his authority (through a standstill agreement with Pakistan); and
§ If it was actually executed, it was improperly executed.
India’s claim to sovereignty over Jammu and Kashmir through the Instrument of Accession has never been recognized by any proper legal authority and has been rejected by the United Nations(including the Security Council) since 1948, when India first brought its dispute with Pakistan over Jammu and Kashmir to the UN. Despite basing its claim to sovereignty over Jammu and Kashmir on the Instrument of Accession, the India has repeatedly materially breached its terms. In August 2019, India went beyond its historic breaches by repudiating the Instrument of Accession altogether (see C.O. 273 of August 6,2019). India’s repeated, material violations and repudiation of the Instrument of Accession demonstrate that India itself views the purported legal instrument that is foundational to its claim to sovereignty over Jammu and Kashmir as invalid and/or non-binding. Still, the invalid Instrument of Accession is the legal cover invoked by India to legitimate its ongoing illegal occupation,annexation and colonization of Indian-administered Jammu and Kashmir and its government’s policy seeking to annex Pakistan-administered Jammu and Kashmir......................
Useless and misleading commentary 😂😂😂😂😂
"""""""""""Bhikharistan"""""""""""""🥴🥴😫😫😇😇😇😇🇮🇳🇮🇳
Wellcome in kargil.... ❤❤❤ Yahang koie khatra nahi hai yah sab jhooth hai
Pakistan tohode hi janha Khatra ho.. Bhikharistan that’s is Pakistan 😂😂😂😂😂😂
We Kargil people don't want us to be associated with Kashmir. Please don't portray 1% of population as a narrative. Disgusting. We had a different status from leh regarding UT but we would associate ourselves more with leh rather than kashmir. Leh and Kargil are atleast peaceful and without any terrorist activity.