Best troop formation for team attack in war and order

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 34

  • @LordPikaGaming
    @LordPikaGaming  3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This 2 by 2 formation is no longer available. When you send only two types of frontline, such as mages and archers, you will get a formation that looks like odd archers - even mages - odd mages - even archers from left to right.
    (While sending mages and then archers)

    • @rayy5699
      @rayy5699 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Does it mean we shouldn’t use a 2by2 formation now? And when we say 2by2. Means odd inf and even inf. And both types of mages and highest tier archers. Right?
      The odd inf dies very fast tho

    • @LordPikaGaming
      @LordPikaGaming  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      If you can send some cavalry to attack, the ideal formation is 4 by 4. However, I prefer to send two front-line and two back lines (people should choose two back lines).
      Why? Because our purpose is to preserve the backline at all costs, and if I employ mage tech and deploy several archers, the group's average stats would drop, affecting the battle.
      You have the choice to send all four backlines. There's also a risk you'll get hit, and higher-level troops won't die, so you can try sending lower-tier troops to die.( frontline ) The greater solution is to protect the heavy-sided backline.

  • @romainbruchet5818
    @romainbruchet5818 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    We're using this setup for ew and ea, only issue is the speed of archer players who need to make sure they leave a few secs after. And as well as putting two types of archers or mages, people need to make sure they put more than 1 of the second type because if it dies in the first battle it can give some funny setups if you land first in the next one, with eventually some backline moving around and not hitting anything. If you send 200 of the other type you'll still have some survivors after a few hits and that will allow you to keep the shape described in the video.

    • @LordPikaGaming
      @LordPikaGaming  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah 2 by 2 with good percentage of both types of frontline works fine . But if one person sent wrong formation then we cant predict what happens next ( they might re-occupy their orginal formation or try to adjust with new formation)

    • @romainbruchet5818
      @romainbruchet5818 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@LordPikaGaming It's not necessarily the wrong formation at the start, but in ew if you send max t12 mages and 1 t11 mage (plus frontline), the formation will be good for the first fight but then your 1 mage may get killed by some beast skills and on the next fight you'll only have 1 type of mage left, causing if you land first all the backline trying to fit behind angels where there is only room for 2. If you send 100 or 200 you'll always have a ratio of survivors after every battle and it won't cause the problem I'm mentioning.

    • @LordPikaGaming
      @LordPikaGaming  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah two types of backline with good number is good but i'm not sure I guess that if two frontline is surviving then nothing will touch at backline and Angel's will target only heavy backline on each 13 seconds.

    • @romainbruchet5818
      @romainbruchet5818 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@LordPikaGaming the dragons and phenix hit all the backline every 13s with their second skill.

    • @califas87
      @califas87 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      My team does three by two. 85k t10 infantry, 1 of each horse, 1 angel (optional to send more), and only one type of troops in back, your strongest mage type or strongest archer type. As a team, we send archers and mages, but it is important that the individual does not mix the back line. Done correctly, all attacks are directed towards t10 infantry and all backline is covered.

  • @yasaralkhasawneh3852
    @yasaralkhasawneh3852 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Can you please tell the best troops formation to attack the monsters and the best for collecting resources from the castles we attack for level 18 !!

    • @LordPikaGaming
      @LordPikaGaming  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      While fighting regular monsters, there is no need to worry about formation. However, since every setup responds differently to event monsters, you must test them all. For example: You can experiment with and without angels, larger frontline or at the very least the front line.
      And if the castle is being attacked alone( solo), you can use your main formation. However, you can alter your formation in accordance with the enemy's setup.
      (In all situations, the main objective is to protect your backline.)

    • @yasaralkhasawneh3852
      @yasaralkhasawneh3852 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@LordPikaGaming thanks for quick responding..
      My castel's level is 18 I want to know more about typical formations for attacking deferent targets ..

    • @LordPikaGaming
      @LordPikaGaming  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I assume you use T6( even infantry) . Therefore, you can send, even infantry and odd infantry (1000-5000). And the majority of your troop should be made up of even archers and a few odd archers. That is 2by2 formation, 2 front line and 2 backline.
      When you reach level 19, you will be able to switch to t7 odd infantry and t7 odd archers, or you can send t6 even infantry + a small number of even cavalry and even archers (few) + odd archers (t7).( still 2by2 formation)
      Sending even or odd infantry for the front line, and mages or archers depending on their choice, is the ideal strategy for a team attack. It would be better to say odd mages and odd mages if everyone can fix these two troop types. If others are opting to send,even archers or mages, they can send them. But, only troop type, for example, if it's mages, odd inf + even and even mages. ( 2by1 formation)

  • @ndonakreatif8045
    @ndonakreatif8045 หลายเดือนก่อน

    apakah ada formasi Solo untuk pemanah + infanteri ?

  • @LordPikaGaming
    @LordPikaGaming  4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Imp: [[[Everyone needs to sent two types of backline with troops morethan 500 on each sides or it will mess up the formation (ex: 500 even/odd archers or 100k odd/even archers ) Another thing is that the chances to get hit for single type of troops are 1 vs 1, 2 vs 1, 3vs1 and 4 vs 1. When we use this formation the chances for 2 /3 vs 1 will be higher than the normal formations. (( ex: even archers+mages will hit even infantry and odd mages+archers will hit odd infantry))
    Since we are forced mages to hit troops in the center ( consider 4 by 4 formation/frontline) they wont hit cavalry until it dies also there positions are unchanged untill all 4 types of frontline die.]]]

  • @aymanharbi4254
    @aymanharbi4254 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can you write for us the best set up army ! you said that is a mistake send only one unite of cavalry to attack and focus on mages or archers

    • @LordPikaGaming
      @LordPikaGaming  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The purpose of this formation is to protect the back line so that even when you lose, you will only lose the front line in battles. But when you send a single type of cavalry there is a chance for the mages to die on both sides. (Regular 4 by 4 formation)

  • @jipenacastillo5993
    @jipenacastillo5993 ปีที่แล้ว

    Things are weird. Just did an star mine attack to check on this but if sending odd cavs and even infants their position ends the other way around. I hate it is not easier to understand how this game works. Why and how do you have odd cavs to the right and even infants to the left?????? I wish you can explain it to me

    • @LordPikaGaming
      @LordPikaGaming  ปีที่แล้ว

      th-cam.com/video/x3_lzX8dTnI/w-d-xo.html
      check this video ☝

  • @luisvalenzuela2802
    @luisvalenzuela2802 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You can place ideal attack formation if you are Mage / Infantry ... Troop level t12 and t11 ... Thank you

    • @LordPikaGaming
      @LordPikaGaming  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Only mages on the backline? Fine, but damage reduction needs to be improved. If the opponent uses infantry / archers, infantry will take 25% less damage from mages and archers will take 30% more damage from infantry. When considering overall statistics, this effect would have an impact.

    • @luisvalenzuela2802
      @luisvalenzuela2802 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What formation would you use for a 288k march?

    • @LordPikaGaming
      @LordPikaGaming  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      2 by 2 (odd/even infantry + odd/even mages, but not much say if even mages are heavy side then 5k -15k odd mages) I prefer sending more angels (maximum). Angels will stay behind your heavy side if even cavalry + infantry is present (I'm not sure just checking by sending some troops to farming castles).

  • @TheSiddarthkona
    @TheSiddarthkona 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What best formation infantry and image

    • @LordPikaGaming
      @LordPikaGaming  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The frontline accounts for 20 to 25 percent of the total, with the remainder composed of angel and backline. On solo attacks, that's the standard code for the formation. In formation, you must keep the heavy backline under the frontline. On team attacks, I'm not a fan of sending just one kind of troop, such as mages or archers.

  • @Erebos_Darko
    @Erebos_Darko 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    do you still play in 810? if so which alliance?:)

  • @AA-rd8ch
    @AA-rd8ch 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    QUISIERA SABER COMO EXPANDIR MAS MI EJERCITO SOY C20 Y TENGO 56300 YA TENGO LA EXPANSIÓN DE UNIRVESIDAD AL 20 PERO NO ME PASA DE AHI

    • @LordPikaGaming
      @LordPikaGaming  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mejora los campos de perforación. mejorar la investigación universitaria > liderazgo (1). El límite del ejército se mejora con el emblema de comandante. c15/c20 equipo aumenta el límite de tamaño del ejército.

  • @aymanharbi4254
    @aymanharbi4254 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sorry i didn’t understand well, so i need to focus on mages more than archers !

    • @LordPikaGaming
      @LordPikaGaming  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      NO! You can use any backline all depends on the way you use the technology and others.

  • @Rocinante1963
    @Rocinante1963 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Please remove that VERY annoying music. It serves no purpose.

    • @LordPikaGaming
      @LordPikaGaming  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Will be cautious when editing next time.