Why chimps are still in the Stone Age and humans are in the Space Age | New Scientist Weekly 277

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 13

  • @PPitambarP
    @PPitambarP หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    This still doesnt explain why one of the monkies said: fuck this trees, I'm leaving for the plains and I'm evolving hands, legs and neocortex and the rest said: piss off, we're staying like this. Lol

    • @dianapennepacker6854
      @dianapennepacker6854 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Monkeys are pricks! Perhaps they forced our ancestors out of the trees.
      Not convinced we were a plains race. I think a race that evolved alongside rivers and shores hunting.
      Doesn't mean there weren't groups that lived in the plains. Just that the majority of our race lived around water.
      Living around those areas isn't kind to archeologist with errorsion, and ever changing features receding or changing. Especially between ice ages where the shore changes dramatically.
      Wish we could do more aecheology, and dig under water.

    • @perypetierowerzystkizpozna585
      @perypetierowerzystkizpozna585 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Apes have hands too.

  • @wraithofsolidarity
    @wraithofsolidarity หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Human's also listen to the nerds, that's our secret. Alpha-omega paradigm.

  • @Stardust2447
    @Stardust2447 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thats giving humans a lot of credit...

  • @roccov1972
    @roccov1972 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Looks like the female guest is reading. Seems like she should be able to answer the questions without a script. Unless I'm wrong, of course.

  • @WideCuriosity
    @WideCuriosity หลายเดือนก่อน

    You may have asked the wrong folk re the calorie information. Those seriously trying to lose will find the information useful. I certainly did. But there is a difference between a one off sinful event where you know you are not going to worry but will act well once more afterwards, and commonly going to eat out for convenience and will use the information to select between desirable options. However from experience, carbohydrate amount per meal may well be more useful information as some food types are more easily converted to fat that others. Trying to find a low carb option (excluding salad 🤢) is nigh impossible when everything either has rice, or bread, or potato, or pasta, or pastry...
    BTW surely you wouldn't deliberately choose the higher calorie meal 8f hungry, you'd choose the most satisfying option.

  • @faizanrana2998
    @faizanrana2998 หลายเดือนก่อน

    how about fining people for being fat?

  • @vgrof2315
    @vgrof2315 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Too hard to understand the "tut tut" accents.

  • @BestAu-xo9rh
    @BestAu-xo9rh หลายเดือนก่อน

    Humans are definitely not in the space age, you dreaming

  • @hunterG60k
    @hunterG60k หลายเดือนก่อน

    You'd think they'd have learned their lesson about labelling things uniquely human by now. It seems we just need to look harder to find examples of such traits in other animals. The assumption that we are special snowflakes is continually frustrating to me given that we are part of the animal kingdom and evolved like every other creature on the planet; why would there be a stepwise difference in us, rather than being part of a continuum? Human exceptionalism has no place in science.