06:25 That record feature is the much wanted feature. Wished from ED to implement it for decade, and it is now Razbam that managed to actually make it to come, after people wished the AV-8B Harrier would have had it. That needs to be feature in everything, as it is key component for the RECON flights. Where we should be able to get a cold war recon pods for some planes (Viggen, MiG-21 etc) and fly over the expected target area and hit weapon release button to start RECpod to start taking screenshots at proper time/rate. And then have automatic system in DCS, that will separately mark the JPEG files in the capture directory that has a recognizable Unit ID in camera field of view. So player can then later check the JPEG files for finding the unit there manually. Or that the system can automatically use such to generate the mission briefing and import the JPEG back from the area. Think about it for while. First you read a intelligence report that units should be in area of 10 x 5 km sized in given area. And then go flying there at low and fast the recon mission. Hit record in area overpass, and return back to base. Now you will get the system generate you the next mission briefing, the units that are in frames inside a camera FOV on capture moment, gets marked by type (as Petrovich) for "Armor", "Truck", "SAM", "Radar" and so on. The players will get the JPEG pictures in the area to look at, and then use them to create the own mission for a strike. Or have a automatic mission creation with flightplan, weapon loadout and amount of fighters. The AI will fly such a mission, but player can at any given time jump to any of flight members to be part of it.
Looks like it's coming together nicely. So many systems to learn! Personally I've already paid up and I'd rather have a good product at launch than get it too soon with problems. If I get impatient I can just fire up DCS and finally learn some F-16 workflows to relieve the boredom.
@@getsideways7257 you know how many people that are impatient now would go absolutely nuts if Razbam released without enough time in the oven, right? "I want the toys now" turns into "you jerks gave me broken toys" real fast.
I don't plan on getting this module but I'm really excited for the guys that are going to fly her. Looks like Razbam really knocked it out of the park with this one............HURRY AND RELEASE IT ALREADY!!!!!!
They (and a good portion of the community) believe that if the module was held in the internal testing limbo for decades, it will magically become bug-free on release :) Except we all have very different computers and software combinations, so that's pretty idiotic. Polychop is probably never going to release the Kiowa at all. But those guys are probably unable to produce something not overly bugged in the first place.
Ah yes, the laser range limit in DCS... And not just the arbitrary 8 naut limit, but the fact that (at least the last time I checked) it was modeled as basically an 8 naut long invisible stick, so could end in mid-air. Buddy lasing for another plane could have their laser spot track lock onto a point hundreds of meters in the air if the designating plane accidentally got too far from the target... =)
For everyone who is angry. No matter how fast they put it out. You will need to wait years before it's actually done/complete or even majority of systems to be finished. I feel your frustration more then anyone but if you've been around a decade. You'd know this is standard practice. If ed would every learn they would stop announcing projects until they at bare minimum 3 months from release. If you think that's bad. They have the ground work to make this an AIR/SEA/LAND sim. But they won't pull their heads out of their arse.
The way I see it, you can put it out fast or you can put it out ready. This project has taken ages and will still be missing multiple important weapon systems. On top of that early access footage has shown a lousy sound model and poor optimization for pc.
@@ascherlafayette8572 I wasn’t talking about the strike eagle, as for that they probably should’ve kept silent about it until it’s ready same as any module. One teaser is enough but to do pre orders etc with no release is scummy. On top of that have an unfinished module for years.
On the armament page, is that a custom font (hand written looking font)? Any chance we can get that font for our personal projects? Like printing labels and backgrounds for the TM MFDs I searched a ton of time for the B1 font (as shown in some video online but couldnt find it)
the air to ground mapping on this plane is insane. Looks like some 2020 tech going on honestly insane you are doing this all and pulling it off like this. impressive
Well, that's Synthetic Radar Aperture for you. Not really anything new, but still one of the things that impresses me about radars the most anyway. You might want to also look up ISAR, but I don't think we'll ever see that in a sim.
17:24 When you laser-designate the last tank with the TPOD, the target designation on the RDR jumps to the center of the tank line, which is not where the TPOD has designated. Is that a bug or intentional?
Was wondering about that too, and was a bit worried/confused by how he was trying to designate the tank in black hot mode (so tank was black) while using the white contrast targeting mode.
What's the significance of ATRK or PTRK being boxed or not? After you designate a target they remain unboxed, but sometimes they are boxed as you are moving the TPOD around, so what's the difference?
I think they said something like 3 more videos then release, so that's this video, probably a cold start video and a takeoff-landing one. this is just an educated guess and delays are always possible as with every module release. idt there any major systems that haven't been covered by these videos yet so i guess we'll see. edit: having just wached the video he says there'll be an A-G tutorial too.
Yesterday I was doing some GBU bombing and my laser was in safe mode, I couldn't for the life of me figure out how to arm it. I went into the WSO position and armed it but it still showed up as SAFE and didnt work at all. What am I missing?
Not all the HOTAS functions, since front seat lacks the necessary number of hats, but you definitely will be able to operate the TGP and assorted systems from the front seat. Redundancy redundancy redundancy.
Any idea when the Auto bombing mode will be fixed? Literally every time I designate, lase, and drop a GBU it always goes beyond the designated target. Every single time. The main function of the damn module doesn't even work lmao. I've tried so many times.
I had understood pretty much everything could be done as the pilot, but you keep changing to the back seat rather than controlling the pod from the pilot position. Is this a limitation on function or do you do it just for familiarity etc?
i believe hes simply trying to show from the seat that is intended to do it. bombs would normally be delivered from the back seat, so he delivers them from there.
ED keep saying it's out soon to rush people to pre-order. Then they show a list as long as an arm for things remaining that are 'progressing well'' .....
Pretty sure they don’t have the AI set up at all yet. I feel like these videos are what they are working on at the time. The module ain’t gonna be released for another year I bet.
at 17:21, when designating, the radar jumps off target by about 15 meters down. INS drift, or an actual issue / bug? It could be worrying if this is not due to INS drift or natural deviance when f.ex. using JDAM's. Clarification would be nice :-)
Would somebody tell Ranger Ram Jet here that he is not briefing actual combat pilots. Remind him that he is talking to civilians, gamers, flight sim fans, combat sim fans, students, etc. Take some tutorial clues from Wags of Eagle Dynamics and turn off the Jar Head... Please!
It's NOT the 'Hypotenuse'. . it's the BASE leg of the triangle. Hypotenuse is the length from the airborne aircraft, direct line, to the target. BASE leg is the GROUND distance, which is what you NEED to know, between a spot directly under the aircraft and the target. And this guy was an OFFICER in the USAF????? I am suitably UNimpressed.
так мили вроде никогда нельзя было тратить на предзаказ. А так, если хотел страйк игл, то лучше щас возьми, потому что на него потом долго скидок не будет.
@@chukuma4760 Um, this was announced 6 years go. Or at least mentioned, lol. There is regular patience and there is Monk like patience. We began monk like patience like 3 years ago, lol.
@@chukuma4760 No doubt. I'm still waiting for the P51s guns to get fixed. I want the entire 9 yds, not 8, lol. Like the OP I cant wait for the Phantom either.
![บุษบา - เมนทอล [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/IGnWPokSEis/mqdefault.jpg)
Hell yes
06:25 That record feature is the much wanted feature. Wished from ED to implement it for decade, and it is now Razbam that managed to actually make it to come, after people wished the AV-8B Harrier would have had it.
That needs to be feature in everything, as it is key component for the RECON flights. Where we should be able to get a cold war recon pods for some planes (Viggen, MiG-21 etc) and fly over the expected target area and hit weapon release button to start RECpod to start taking screenshots at proper time/rate. And then have automatic system in DCS, that will separately mark the JPEG files in the capture directory that has a recognizable Unit ID in camera field of view. So player can then later check the JPEG files for finding the unit there manually. Or that the system can automatically use such to generate the mission briefing and import the JPEG back from the area.
Think about it for while.
First you read a intelligence report that units should be in area of 10 x 5 km sized in given area. And then go flying there at low and fast the recon mission. Hit record in area overpass, and return back to base.
Now you will get the system generate you the next mission briefing, the units that are in frames inside a camera FOV on capture moment, gets marked by type (as Petrovich) for "Armor", "Truck", "SAM", "Radar" and so on. The players will get the JPEG pictures in the area to look at, and then use them to create the own mission for a strike.
Or have a automatic mission creation with flightplan, weapon loadout and amount of fighters. The AI will fly such a mission, but player can at any given time jump to any of flight members to be part of it.
Gib release
2 weeks
wirklich so
I read this in your avatars voice
@@timgrh20502 more months
@@nero995 "very soon" (C)
Bought mine Saturday. I can't wait to get my hands on it. Now get back to work!
Looks like it's coming together nicely. So many systems to learn! Personally I've already paid up and I'd rather have a good product at launch than get it too soon with problems. If I get impatient I can just fire up DCS and finally learn some F-16 workflows to relieve the boredom.
It looks like you'll get it too late with problems . . .
Or you could just install the module when you believe it's "ready", you know? Why people like you decide when we are getting the modules anyway?
@@getsideways7257 you know how many people that are impatient now would go absolutely nuts if Razbam released without enough time in the oven, right? "I want the toys now" turns into "you jerks gave me broken toys" real fast.
So advanced, I've barely left the ground in the EA, I love all the required training!
Really enjoying A/G recently and this plane looks so much fun. That FLIR HUD is going to be a game changer im sure.
HUD FLIR is already in the AV-8B N/A Harrier.
@@paristo ew british plane
@@ChickentNug AV-8B is major ways different plane than British AV-8A. It is more USA than British.
thanks for all the hard work!
Love the focus loss on the tpod! Nice detail
Sincerely looking forward to it !
I don't plan on getting this module but I'm really excited for the guys that are going to fly her. Looks like Razbam really knocked it out of the park with this one............HURRY AND RELEASE IT ALREADY!!!!!!
They (and a good portion of the community) believe that if the module was held in the internal testing limbo for decades, it will magically become bug-free on release :) Except we all have very different computers and software combinations, so that's pretty idiotic.
Polychop is probably never going to release the Kiowa at all. But those guys are probably unable to produce something not overly bugged in the first place.
haha, you get it! i pre-paid but id rather a good product than a rushed one :D
Looks like this going to be a lot of fun! I really enjoy precision strikes. Thanks for the update.
I love the F-15 soooo much, thank you
New definition of the term “ study sim.” Looking forward to it.
Ah yes, the laser range limit in DCS... And not just the arbitrary 8 naut limit, but the fact that (at least the last time I checked) it was modeled as basically an 8 naut long invisible stick, so could end in mid-air. Buddy lasing for another plane could have their laser spot track lock onto a point hundreds of meters in the air if the designating plane accidentally got too far from the target... =)
For the F-16 and F-18 it's 16nm
@@0Ignition0 Oh? Interesting, been a while since I tested, and that was with the A-10C. Is it the same for the ATFLIR and the LITENING on the Hornet?
So, it's not just the flat Earth, huh... What an advanced simulation.
@@getsideways7257 There's a lot of baggage in the sim certainly, and not all aspects are up to snuff, but it does many things well.
@@jubuttib It's just that even FlightGear has a geoid...
Wow what a week , 2 Videos from Wags , new Video from Razbam , nice , nice 😁
For everyone who is angry. No matter how fast they put it out. You will need to wait years before it's actually done/complete or even majority of systems to be finished.
I feel your frustration more then anyone but if you've been around a decade. You'd know this is standard practice. If ed would every learn they would stop announcing projects until they at bare minimum 3 months from release.
If you think that's bad. They have the ground work to make this an AIR/SEA/LAND sim. But they won't pull their heads out of their arse.
Yea I’ve been wondering when they’ll do more ground simulation. Idk about sea in dcs not sure what or how it could work.
The way I see it, you can put it out fast or you can put it out ready. This project has taken ages and will still be missing multiple important weapon systems. On top of that early access footage has shown a lousy sound model and poor optimization for pc.
@@ascherlafayette8572 I wasn’t talking about the strike eagle, as for that they probably should’ve kept silent about it until it’s ready same as any module. One teaser is enough but to do pre orders etc with no release is scummy. On top of that have an unfinished module for years.
shouldn't market it as year of the strike eagle then
@@Billy-sm3uu 6 months of the strike eagle 💀 if the f4 comes out this year It’ll be the year of the phantom.
Thanks Notso. That was very helpful.
I would rather see these than another SOON post.
Can't wait.
Looking great.
F15E my beloved
Frrr
That is some study level stuff...
Boy I can't wait for this bad boy to be in my module manager :)
This was accurate. Very much so!
On the armament page, is that a custom font (hand written looking font)? Any chance we can get that font for our personal projects? Like printing labels and backgrounds for the TM MFDs
I searched a ton of time for the B1 font (as shown in some video online but couldnt find it)
at 20:27 it seems like the aircraft still pitches up when in autopilot alt mode, is it working as intended?
I am wondering about the optimization of the module.
the air to ground mapping on this plane is insane. Looks like some 2020 tech going on honestly insane you are doing this all and pulling it off like this. impressive
Well, that's Synthetic Radar Aperture for you. Not really anything new, but still one of the things that impresses me about radars the most anyway.
You might want to also look up ISAR, but I don't think we'll ever see that in a sim.
@@getsideways7257 Perhaps we might see it for NCTR, EF2000?
Forever Two Weeks. ❤
I'm stuck in that part.... "jump to the back seat" 😂😂🙏
Wow I want now
17:24 When you laser-designate the last tank with the TPOD, the target designation on the RDR jumps to the center of the tank line, which is not where the TPOD has designated. Is that a bug or intentional?
Was wondering about that too, and was a bit worried/confused by how he was trying to designate the tank in black hot mode (so tank was black) while using the white contrast targeting mode.
maybe an error caused by the plane moving to a new position overlaying the new point based off the radar map built from a previous position.
Thanks !
So the WPT/BPT function shows you what it's going to be if you click it, but the WHT/BHT shows what it is right now?
Not confusing at all 😅
Do the engine sounds come later in Early Access??
What's the significance of ATRK or PTRK being boxed or not? After you designate a target they remain unboxed, but sometimes they are boxed as you are moving the TPOD around, so what's the difference?
Can the LANTIRN be cued and un-stowed from the front seat as well, or is that a WSO only thing?
YES!!!!!
What's next? more video or aircraft release? 😞
I think they said something like 3 more videos then release, so that's this video, probably a cold start video and a takeoff-landing one. this is just an educated guess and delays are always possible as with every module release.
idt there any major systems that haven't been covered by these videos yet so i guess we'll see.
edit: having just wached the video he says there'll be an A-G tutorial too.
Yesterday I was doing some GBU bombing and my laser was in safe mode, I couldn't for the life of me figure out how to arm it. I went into the WSO position and armed it but it still showed up as SAFE and didnt work at all. What am I missing?
When is this module coming out on Steam?
Nice Notso.
yay
Can all of this be done from front seat?
Not all the HOTAS functions, since front seat lacks the necessary number of hats, but you definitely will be able to operate the TGP and assorted systems from the front seat. Redundancy redundancy redundancy.
we need the sniper pod!!! D:
Any idea when the Auto bombing mode will be fixed? Literally every time I designate, lase, and drop a GBU it always goes beyond the designated target. Every single time. The main function of the damn module doesn't even work lmao. I've tried so many times.
Any luck yet? or are we both just stupid?
yes
I had understood pretty much everything could be done as the pilot, but you keep changing to the back seat rather than controlling the pod from the pilot position. Is this a limitation on function or do you do it just for familiarity etc?
You get an extra mfd
i believe hes simply trying to show from the seat that is intended to do it. bombs would normally be delivered from the back seat, so he delivers them from there.
“Soon not TM” lol..Love it 😂
I was hoping for Early access release clip! these videos are just teasing .
If teasing is like getting kicked in the nards, then yes, teasing.
ED keep saying it's out soon to rush people to pre-order. Then they show a list as long as an arm for things remaining that are 'progressing well'' .....
Get used to it...
@Razbam, just curious, any idea of an eta for when the F-15E might drop ?, just curious is all.
Next year
@@SPFLDAngler No, it will prob be in a couple more months.
Nah it’ll probably be a couple years
Wow
Could we see this video again all from the front seat for us solo guys?
Great video chief
Pretty sure they don’t have the AI set up at all yet. I feel like these videos are what they are working on at the time. The module ain’t gonna be released for another year I bet.
Year of the strike eagle!!1!1!1!
@@SPFLDAngler I wasn't talking about TALON. I was asking to see how the pilot does it all.
Those scientists better check their hypotenuses
WSO!!!!
sniper pod?
at 17:21, when designating, the radar jumps off target by about 15 meters down. INS drift, or an actual issue / bug?
It could be worrying if this is not due to INS drift or natural deviance when f.ex. using JDAM's. Clarification would be nice :-)
Ready for us in 2 weeks….
just wish we could have a date of release........
is it a lightning 1 pod like the F14 or a lightning 2 like A10C, F16 and FA18 ?
Its a Lantirn Pod, pre lightning. Lightning and sniper come later.
The F-14 doesn’t have a lightning pod..
Thanks guys. The worst I knew both answer but it was 2 AM when I posted without thinking. Have a nice day.
2 more weeks!
2 weeks™
why?
UNLEASH THE KRAKEN!!!!!
When we'll be able to pre-order this on Steam? Please.
Once it has a release date
Sorry correction there will be no pre order for steam. Just the 20% early access discount once it’s released.
The pilot can do it all alone right? 😢
will the F-15E have data link?
Not at release
@@ClaudioMezzasalma aww unfortunate
I wanna hear CSO for Air Force birds 🦅
Nice video, but I think folks were hoping for the cold start video...I guess this means this bird is ready for release anytime soon....
it will be finished in two weeks
Looks harder thant the F18
GIVE THE HARD SET RELEASE ALREADY
it will be may 29th dude calm down
@@BarManFesteiro RAZBAM said it will not be may in the discord.
@@dexter7954 May 32nd I guarantee it or my name isn't Caroline
As a marketing professional I believe they gonna release closer to July for reasons of high purchase season
But again, Christmas is also a very high purchase season so I might be wrong lol
I’m sorry but is it me or is the harder to set a A/G drop in the f15 than the A10c. Man, now I know why you have a two seater. Challenge accepted.
RELEASE!
Thank hod its not two weeks
two weeks
why?
Release date 2025
So today wasn't the day. Dam.
Shouldn't the cueing to a waypoint be smooth instead of instant. Does not seem possible in real life
So many teasing delay teasing delay , hal price 3 time nice attntion razabam
Im hungry. Very, hungry
Just relase dude
Would somebody tell Ranger Ram Jet here that he is not briefing actual combat pilots. Remind him that he is talking to civilians, gamers, flight sim fans, combat sim fans, students, etc. Take some tutorial clues from Wags of Eagle Dynamics and turn off the Jar Head... Please!
June
What year? 😅
First
It's NOT the 'Hypotenuse'. . it's the BASE leg of the triangle. Hypotenuse is the length from the airborne aircraft, direct line, to the target. BASE leg is the GROUND distance, which is what you NEED to know, between a spot directly under the aircraft and the target. And this guy was an OFFICER in the USAF????? I am suitably UNimpressed.
не буду покупать раз мили не даёте потратить😑😑😑
так мили вроде никогда нельзя было тратить на предзаказ. А так, если хотел страйк игл, то лучше щас возьми, потому что на него потом долго скидок не будет.
Video number 350 in a series of about 10,000 no doubt, before eventual release. Zzzzzz.
The Phantom will be way, way better, imo.
Be patient dude
@@chukuma4760 Um, this was announced 6 years go. Or at least mentioned, lol. There is regular patience and there is Monk like patience. We began monk like patience like 3 years ago, lol.
@@mitch_the_-itch almost ever plane in dcs took over 4 years to develop
@@chukuma4760 No doubt. I'm still waiting for the P51s guns to get fixed. I want the entire 9 yds, not 8, lol.
Like the OP I cant wait for the Phantom either.
In DCS, for a module to be released it takes around 5 years, from announcement to early access, unfortunately.
I want to watch these but it's so hard with all the "uhhh"s. So many.