Race Conditions in C# .NET Core
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 ก.ย. 2024
- Race conditions in c# asp.net core application can happen whenever you involve IO. We will answer questions like: what is a race condition? how to simulate race conditions? how to test and resolve race conditions in c#? how to solve race conditions in a distributed application?
Patreon 🤝 / raw_coding
Courses 📚 learning.raw-c...
Shop 🛒 shop.raw-codin...
Discord 💬 / discord
Twitter 📣 / anton_t0shik
Twitch 🎥 / raw_coding
Source Code 📃 / raw_coding
#aspnetcore #async #csharp
Source code for patreon supporters includes an example of how to simulate race conditions using Threads.
www.patreon.com/raw_coding
Great content Anton. Learning from you is great.
Glad you like it!
outstanding video. great information & step-by-step demo. thanks
That is awesome. Thanks
Please, make similar video about deadlocks with real examples in real projects
I’m assuming interlock would work too.
Regarding distributed locking, from what I saw people usually tend to use it to lock updating files and not concurrent database updates! When updating database would it be viable to use Distributed Locking? I heard some developers praise the use of FIFO queues like SQS, RabbitMQ and the like!
queues are a way to structure your application to avoid locking
@@RawCoding Do you think using Redis Distributed Locking would be ideal for solving database update collisions? From your perspective what would be the optimal way in a distributed architecture?
@@salehdanbous6783 I think if you design well, you might not need any locking, but generally it will be queues (actor model, which is queues on steroids)
awesome content, gg!
I respect your knowledge and expertise, but first example is totally wrong.
var resource = 0; // Copy value 0 to resource variable
var worker1 = resource; // Copy value 0 to worker1 variable
var worker2 = resource; // Copy value 0 to worker2 variable
worker1++; // Increase 0 by 1 and copy it to worker1, which is 1
worker2++; // Increase 0 by 1 and copy it to worker2, which is 1
resource = worker1; // Copy value of worker1 to resource, which is 1
resource = worker2; // Copy value of worker2 to resource, which overwrites the assignment above, which is 1
Console.WriteLine(resource); // Of course it will output 1, I really wonder what did you expect?
I am ashamed of myself for explaining this concept as if it is not known already, but:
C#, passes value types by copying their values, not their references. In this context, you cannot directly use resource variable. You can only copy it's current value. This is why you cannot get a race condition out of this.
The example is meant to illustrate what happens in parallel, but un a synchronous manner. So when I named things “worker” they are meant to represent 2 different processes grabbing the same resource at the same time, if they both read the same value and then write back the same value a race condition occurs.
Anton, your channel is so underrated... I hope you hit 1M subs pretty soon! Thank you mate!
Hopefully one day :D
11:39 - I think the explanation about thread starvation is a bit confusing …
But here is my understanding:
10 Tasks
5 Threads
1 thread made it through the locks
4 threads waits (each one with a task assigned)
Threads #1 (in the lock) go to read file see async/await return to thread pool then it get assigned a new task task#6 comes and see the lock blocks too!
Important: Assuming the thread-pool size is 5; if not then a thread from the thread-pool will just be assigned to the file-writing that was previously started by thread#1 and leave the lock.
Ps: For those curious to see this simulation, make sure U set the ThreadPool.SetMinThreads and also ThreadPool.SetMaxThreads
Nice job! I have an issue with production app. I need your advice. Now, I have a transient class which receives an update request. The request may be single or multi which means parallel tasks. Inside this class, I used a method to write some .json file and shut down the running up to continue update on the another local app. Here is the problem, in case multiple requests how can I avoid parallel threds using a specific method? I tried with semaphoreSlim and locks but it doesn’t work perfectly
you've only explained half the topic, you've shown the problem but not the solution
5:00 I'm still a bit uncertain as to why the Task.WhenAll isn't sufficient to have the number get to 1000 before the Console.WriteLine?
It is and isn't. If we do Task.Run it kicks off the process in parallel so that means it may execute the function before we schedule the next task, so on as so forth, if all tasks complete before we schedule the next task they will all complete sequentially
@@RawCoding I'm super confused too. I was expecting "await Task.WhenAll(tasks)" to wait for all tasks to complete and therefore the final result to be 1000.
So what happens here is that when the for loop finishes, the "tasks" variable doesn't hold all tasks?
Task.Run places the function to run on a thread, you are scheduling a task, just because you wait for all the tasks to complete doesn’t mean they will all complete in order or won’t run over each other. If we schedule 1000 tasks faster than any of them start running, some may start at the same time and cause a race condition or they may all run sequentially, we don’t know.
Hello, Anton
Finally, I found a person who shows real things that are really useful for production, and not another set of CRUDs tutorials with a repository pattern (around EF) and 3-layer architecture.
By the way, the guys from dev mentors also have very good content and trying to provide REAL things.
It's not fair that your channel is so underrated, because people just need the simplest things, e.g python bases, how to parse a json files or create a bot that sends hello world (I'm a cool and useful bot (no)).
I worked for a long time as a senior and lead software engineer in OLTP systems, microservices, DDD and etc. It was all around dotnet, C#, azure environment.
2 years ago, I had a situation on a project where I had to migrate data from PostgreSQL to ClickHouse due to the performance of query execution and thus moved to OLAP systems, big data, python, spark, airflow, azure data factory etc., where a lot is built around python, SCALA, R, java and so on
And it's really a shame that dotnet is quite capable of being in the same category, and in terms of performance, it's definitely one of the leaders.
I don’t know if you have worked with Spark or not, but Microsoft has github.com/dotnet/spark, so do you believe in the future of dotnet in the context of big data, machine learning, etc?
Thank you
Cheers, I think .NET is doing pretty good and will continue to do so.
It has an amazing community and from what I've seen amongst other languages (java/python/js/clojure) c# has one of the best set of tools and frameworks out there.
Everything that inherits Stream class next please... :)
That last bit about distributed lock was useful 😎
7:31 - 2x Task
Thanks
What is the difference between using the semaphore vs. redis-conditional, assuming only one thread active on the protected resource?
Semaphore is process scoped, redis is distributed
I have been watching Anton since the beginning of his channel and it is amazing to see how much he has improved the quality of his content. Each time he explains better and in less time.
Community: How could we help him get more popularity and views? Can you imagine Anton dedicating himself to TH-cam full-time? 😱
thank you bro
Hey Anton, thank you for the awesome video, keep it up!
I have a related question that confusing me, when we declare our services as scoped, does that means the .Net will separate contexts between scopes and eliminate racing conditions between them, so one scope will not enter another scope context?
And if you could create a video explaining scopes/transients in the context of threadings and race conditions that would be awesome, thank you!
Cheers, scoped/transient doesn’t do anything for race conditions - it’s service lifetime it’s about which object you get
Impressive ! Thank you Anton.
At 12:15, could we bypass this effect by using *ConfigureAwait(false)* ?
No, threads processing the tasks would be blocked.
@@RawCoding so the 5 threads that processing the Tasks will be waiting the operation the finish, and even if the operation is done, there will be no available thread (since all are occupied) to finish up the initial Task.
Did I get it right?
The last part about how you can use Redis to handle lock on a distributed system / distributed lock is very useful
Out of context, what's the keyboard using ? That sounded nice. : ) as always top video. Thanks for getting and keeping my job.
It is a keyboard with red switches. ;)
It’s keychron with brown switches
I like the browns as well, blue switches are too obnoxious.
Are you using Linux?
mac
Good high-end topic, with suggestions for resolutions
I run into those usually when I have database update statements in my code.
I love your videos, thanks for making them
awesome content! separates men from the boys
I wish I was as smart as you! 😂
Thank you
thanks for it. I learnt semaphore and mutex :) why you didn't try Concurrent something is there any solution with it? I would like to try, I have just finished the video :)
and
Parallel.For(0, 1000, (i, state) =>
{
number++;
});
this one is gives the 1000
that really interesting I have tried with concurrentbag and concurrentqueue and both of is messed up also I have tried with arrays, there is no difference
I also understand the mutex, Mutex works as await when it finished I saw many various values smaller than 1000 on the doc.
I didn't understand one thing, appreciate this video and I also watched your async await video some time ago and still I remember how it works. Normal for loop finished in 1.2 sec by writing a file, async threads finished in 4.5 sec. Why should we use async threads? it works slower than the sync
not sure how you measured, but sync is faster than async. And you use async to avoid blocking, if you don't have async you have to use locks and threads.
@@RawCoding yes I found same results, sync is faster. :)
Hi Anton, what IDE are you using in this video?
It is Rider by JetBrains. Not free, but worth every penny.
@@tonyschoborg Hey Tony, could you provide some of the nice features VS doesn't have while Rider has? I know ReSharper and want to know more about it.
It's Rider, they have a trial you can try it out
@@obsidian741 Some things more objective and trivial. Looks, colors, etc. I really like the new cleaner UI.
I originally switched when my VS was bugging out and I could not rename variables, it would just crash. spent better part of a day updating, reinstalling, restarting before I downloaded Rider.
The biggest thing for me is spell check. And not only for comments and log messages, but even variable and class names.
Also much better code analysis. there are a few things that Rider picked up on we could do better after we switched. A lot better options to refactor, as well.
There are a lot of things that you will get from Resharper, if that is the route you go.
Lmao, that Java ripoff's compiler can't even detect race conditions?