I don't remember many games (and by that I mean I only know four), but the ones I do know I learnt by playing them over and over otb and in my head because I liked them. If you get excited enough about a game it'll probably stick.
Its not that hard. Im only 1300 but when i joined a local chessclub and started playing long games for hours i also could remember the entire game. It helps if u enter all games in the analisys board online later and talk the game through afterwards
After Anderssen's death in 1879, Wilhelm Steinitz published a tribute in The Field in which he annotated Anderssen's two most famous games, the Evergreen and the Immortal Game against Lionel Kieseritzky. Steinitz wrote, "An evergreen in the laurel crown of the departed chess hero", thus giving this game its name.” Allegedly.
The thing I love about the Opera Game is what Levy hinted at - chess wasn't anywhere near as well understood at the time. Morphy was figuring out what most chess players now take for granted. He singlehandedly brought chess to the next level, then retired from chess at 22, because he felt it was a frivolous pursuit. Possibly chess's most enigmatic figure.
Chess engines rate him at 2400, but his best opponents rate only at 2100. In fact, no one approached 2400 until Capablanca, nearly 70 years later. His mother wanted him to focus on his legal practice, but that was not where his head was. His family was rich, so he muttled at lawyering and kept his head down (after a stint of military experience during the Civil War). He was not enthused about the military, not enthused about being a lawyer, not enthused about women and relationships, became "disagreeable" in his 40s, and died of a supposed stroke at age 47.
Honestly. these videos are so entertaining. From the incredible storytelling to the fact that anyone of any skill level can watch this and still follow along. I have never played a single game of chess in my life and don't know any of the theory, but I still feel the excitement and suspense from start to finish. Thank you for making chess so accessible and fun to everyone!
They say a perfect chess game ends in a draw, but I think game 3 is a better example of a perfect game: white checkmates black while black has mate in 1.
The second game is absolutely incredible. Black had the whole army, with the exception of the loss of just 3 pawns, while white had sacrificed both rooks, the queen and a bishop. e5 was crazy to find out. That's a game that really looked unreal. Wow
In fact, judit polgar and boris spaasky both played the bc4 line and happily moved their king to f1 so this isn't one of those "back in the day" situations (ok back in the seventies and eighties maybe)
When Levy said there wasn't gonna be any crazy queen sacs for insane mates with the last game, I was skeptical of how awesome it would be, but I think that's the most beautiful game of Chess I have seen in my life!
@@nextgenfootball69420 Karpov would crush your family's honour in 10 moves or less you bozo, you are probably sub 1k elo to make such a moronic assumption.
My first chess computer program was Chessmaster 2000 in 1983 on an Apple Iic. I still remember that it had an option where you could call up a few old game, including "Evergreen" and A's "Immortal".
Loved this episode even though I knew most of the games. Would love to see this continued. Especially Bc I feel like older games before so much theory and engines the attacks were so belligerent and are fun to watch
These games were insane. Thanks for opening my eyes to the world of chess. There's so much potential in this game and so many stories to tell. You really created a niché for yourself being a great chess player and a great storyteller. Hats off to you
As for the evergreen, steinitz at the time said it was Anderssen' best game and, like a laurel crown, would have remained evergreen and never fade. A bit over dramatic maybe, but he was definitely right Edit: had to wiki who said it
No list is going to cover everything perfectly, but Kasparov vs. Topalov is yet another fantastic game. I once had the opportunity to ask Kasparov about his personal favorite game, and he selected his game vs. Topalov. If I caught him on a different day, he may have selected his game vs Karpov instead. Both of these games are considered his "immortals", and it's hard to select the "best" one.
Been waiting for a vid like this forever! Thanks for all your grind and effort Levy, you're a legit asset to the game and community of chess and we appreciate all your work!
@@alexethan7469 Bots? These are clearly Real Women(TM) who want to get to know you now. Seriously though they were lightning fast. RIP for the poor bastards who actually click those links.
For me, playing chess is about the experience of seeing patterns and visualizing outcomes. There were moves in these games where I didn't know what was about to happen. Thanks Levy, you're a great guide.
@@ThePapaja1996 Although they never played each other directly, (not even when Steinitz visited Morphy in New Orleans as Paul sadly refused to even discuss chess with him!), there's a fascinating indirect comparison between them through Anderssen. While Adolf didn't stand a snowball's chance in hell against Morphy, he actually had a positive score against Steinitz up until 1866 and an about even lifetime score after he got older! Which speaks volumes about Morphys incredible strength, and that without ever studying the game for even a minute, talk about some natural talent there.... it's unsurpassed to this day... imagine what could have become of Morphy's playing strength had he put similar effort into studying the game like e.g. Bobby did, who lived and breathed chess almost 24/7. And with today's resources... it's beyond imagination, how strong he could have become, who knows, he might have been able to challenge Leela?.. well, maybe not quite, but for sure he could be beyond 3000 ELO today :)
A nice trivia about The Immortal Game is that it is the the game Sebastian and Tyrell are playing in the film Blade Runner, and, without spoiling too much, Roy Batty's quest to defeat death in that film mirrors the sacrifices of the white pieces.
AMAZING AMAZING COMMENTARY!!!!! One of the best videos on chess games I have seen in a long time. Great job Levy!!!! It's nice that you posted these games of the masters. It was very refreshing to watch. I will revisit this clip in future... Thank you!!!
These games were absolutely incredible! Also, I believe the two men in game 4 have opening variations named after them: The McDonnell Attack in the Sicilian Defense (e4, c5, f4) and La Bourdonnais Variation in the French Defense (e4, e6, f4)
That's what happens when you're so much ahead of everyone in your time. It wouldn't surprise me if these guys were actually pretty good players who just didn't know any theory since it was such early times.
@@Lothar445 they were casual players. Morphy played them after being invited to the opera with them, but he wanted to win as fast as possible because he wasn't facing the stage while playing.
Idk why but morphy is so fascinating to me. To me he is the greatest. The fact he’s so old and yet out of all the chess players in history his name is still brought up as one of the best even by people who don’t want to give him credit.
The choices you made are amazing, i am a big fan of Morphy and De la Bourdonnaise, i never knew the games you showed of Anderssen, i will have to watch them again. I think i would have put a game from Tal and probably the 1956 Fisher Byrne game (i think that's my all time favourite tho)
At 31:44 If you're interested, the plural of octopus is octopuses in English, oktopodes in Greek, and octopedes in Latin. Octopi is not a word in any language. The reason being, the -i plural is only for 2nd declension masculine nouns with -us as a suffix e.g. gladius (sword) radius, populus etc. -pus is a morpheme meaning 'foot,' not a -us suffix. This means it is pluralised to feet i.e. pedes.
Those games were absolutely stunning! The brilliancy of some of those moves was truly impressive! I never knew chess could be so beautiful, thank you Levy!
That has never occurred to me in the past: watching so many videos from a single YT channel. Levy, your passion for chess worth much more than you could ever imagine. These were fantastic games! 🤩
I think this list is brilliant, but it's missing one more. The 17 pawn moves game shows the incredible power of solid pawn structures and taking space.
What I admire about Anderson is that after losing to Morphy he improved his own game and gave Steinitz fits in their world championship match. That to me is an even greater accomplishment than these two epic games. Loved the video Levi
Classic games are fun for us noobs. There is no way I can understand GM's moves today. Like I see a move and the GMs be like *moves king from g1 to h1 because of pin in the next 7 moves* like gtfo bro
I'm just starting to learn chess strategy because my son is getting into it. This video was at the perfect level for me. I appreciate how you worked through the moves a little slower but mostly that you explained why those moves were made. Grwat video.
Stunning video! Not only does this thing have amazing games but the blow-by-blow descriptions help modest chess players appreciate the battle of titans. Very well done. I have goosebumps.
To me Morphy's Opera game is the Titanic of chess games. So simple yet so epic. It's the most iconic chess game in my eyes. Whoever is silly enough to criticize a Morphy's move during that game as sub-optimal forgets that these moves are golden, much superior and more artistic than any other engine move and these golden moves make what this game is. A masterpiece.
Stienetz said "Morphy should have played Qxb7, and not was sub par play". Lasker also said the same. This lead to one of the most Gangster Chess quotes of all time "Qxb7 is a *BUTCHER'S* Move! Morphy is an Artist!"
Levy, I noticed a similar use of the Octopus Knight on d3 in the Fischer-R. Byrne game in the 1963 US Championship. In fact, Byrne has his Queen and Rook aligned up identically behind the Knight as in the Kasparov game. The knight in this case did not stay there long but was used with lethal effect as a sac on f2 with the game ending at around move 21. That Fischer went 11-0 in this tourney speaks to his prowess at the time. Fischer has a way of burning the Byrne Brothers (pun intended).
You always post diverse and quality content, like going over past chess games and then all your series plus reviews of the world championship like damn
You should make a part 2 for this with games like steinitz vs von bardeleben and byrne vs Fischer. There are so many games as good and famous as those in the video
Ty for this video, I'm new to chess and your explanations alone helped me improve my approach to strategy. Also, the tree does make a sound if no one is around to hear it. Simply because sound waves exist despite no one being around to perceive them.
What is truly fascinating about the Immortal Game is that it's not a perfect game for White, unlike the Evergreen, in which Anderssen's only dubious move was 17.Nf6+. Anderssen made lots of mistakes as well in the Immortal, but for how chess was analysed (without engines, of course) back in the day, it appeared like a supreme gem in the history of chess. White often lost advantage in that game: 18.Bd6 is a mistake. Kieseritzky didn't see the Queen sacrifice and thought that 20...Na6 was the correct move to prevent mate on c7, but if you put the position on any engine, it will show you that moving the Bishop, thus creating an escape square for the King, leaves White with just a small advantage, given by the opportunity to win back the sacrificed material. It really teaches a lesson on how chess changed: pre-Lasker/Capablanca chess was just a different thing from the cold-blooded Cold-War Sicilians and stuff.
I think you should have added the game with the king walk, the game of the century by Bobby Fischer, some game by Mikhail Tal and the game from Garry Kasparov with the insane calculations.
I've been working night shifts and just watching your videos. They teach me a lot of ways to use pawns, use the h/a pawns and how to use diagonals that do not cross the center. Thank you for being a nice talkative dude. Would love to play sometime! On a side note, I expected you would put a Mikhael Tal game on here, as you were a big fan of him in another video
You could have done like 5 + bonus with that amazing game with the King run with King up one square mate (sadly i don't remember who played it), that would have been perfect
31:46 it actually is octopuses. The ruling on whether the word gets changed to "-pi" or "-uses" simply depends on whether it's Latin or Greek in origin.
Chess before computers!! Daring and creativity showing the magic chess can be. Going to replay this video the next time I see two SGMs agree to a tournament draw after 8 moves. Thanks for the hard work!!
Hey Gotham, can you please do a video on 'how to convert opening advantages into a win, in the middle game'? I struggle with that at times. My rating is 1500 and I can tell i have won the opening battle, but I still somehow play into a position where opponent somehow equalizes and my advantage is gone. It's frustrating.
I think the 5-th game should have been the game between Kasparov VS Topalov whith the double rook sacrfices. This is widley considered as the best game of all time and Kasparov said that this is the best game he ever played.
well yes, it does make a sound, if we are defining sound as particles vibrating in air, even if no one is there, the falling of the tree will still physically affect its environment, its impact will produce a sound because the pressure exerted on the air around the falling tree is physically affected by the tree creating waves of vibrating air particles which moves outward from its center affecting the surrounding environment
Valid point, although even if you define sound like that, you can only hypothesize that it must have made a sound, not knowing the time it would happen. There is no way to test this, since it would not satisfy the question's requisite of no one being there to hear the supposed sound. I don't believe that hypothesis is a prediction, in conclusion. Also, if you define a sound more abstractly, how most humans would define it, the question answers itself. In more detail, a sound is something that is heard, but no one heard the supposed sound of the tree falling, so it's not a sound.
I'm standing on a technicality, basically: time. Saying a tree has fallen is different than saying a tree fell. When you examine the fallen tree you conclude to the first statement, time unspecified. Consequently, you can't know the sound that could have been made either, since the type of sound is a function of time of fall (because of chaos theory, a system like this is sensitive to initial conditions) which is unknown. So if you don't know these, how can you confirm the 'sound'.
And all of that is after forgetting the simple fact that the question is impossible since it is highly likely that the tree falling would affect at least one person. As you said, vibrating air particles move outward affecting the surrounding environment, and at least a human, even infinitesimally. To summarize, the premise of this question is wrong.
5:50 funny, I was having a mathematical discussion about the origins of mathematics while looking at this idea and yeah, assuming a typical forest I think it does, you no one may hear it, but the vibrations when hitting the ground will change the state of the atoms of electrons in both, the ground and the tree, by the vibrations it will make from the change in energy, and even if it is for a tiny fraction, the states were altered which leads puts for certain that it made a sound which is just vibrations from impact.
That shutting the door and beating everyone up example was pretty badass. I now imagine the guy who played that move as a pure badass character. Thanks, Levi for making chess so fun!
Heya, sorry for the really late comment but I have just a quick question about this Anderson game at @14:40 where black unknowingly blunders by moving their knight to A6 for like... No reason at all, aside from just not anticipating what white was planning , since they were quite complex moves. What about if first black moved their C8 bishop to B7 to attack the knight and then pretty much regardless of what white would do next, should be able to bring their G1 bishop up to C6 to attack white's bishop that is on D6? Would that have been enough to prevent that checkmate?
i love how you always say in the latter parts of the video 'if we had enough patience to stick this far'. bro. youre the goat in chess youtube, your viewers are most likely goat in chess youtube watching too. haha. cheers from hk bro. awesome stuff. hope to learn here
Great video dude! I think I've seen most of these games at one point or another but I love how you presented them all and how you strung them together. Thanks!
Wow....these games are givinge chills with the outside of the box thinking these men used. It makes me feel like a monkey cause im just sitting here knowing dam well my brain could have never EVER thought in such a way
Ok ok ok... Kasperov's game plan of not using minor pieces to do the taking even when it's perfectly possible is amazing. Out of the 5 recaps, Kasperov's is the best here.
Levy always pins a negative comment. So here goes.... Levy is so bad at chess he would've attempted the scholar's mate on the first movie of harry potter if he was casted as harry.
I'm always impressed how people can remember full games of other people or even their own.
I remember one, e4 e5 Qh5 Ke7 Qxe5
@@akusalonen7512 xD
Its ez for me because of the insomnia, when you're awake at 3 a.m, there's nothing better to do
I don't remember many games (and by that I mean I only know four), but the ones I do know I learnt by playing them over and over otb and in my head because I liked them. If you get excited enough about a game it'll probably stick.
Its not that hard. Im only 1300 but when i joined a local chessclub and started playing long games for hours i also could remember the entire game. It helps if u enter all games in the analisys board online later and talk the game through afterwards
After Anderssen's death in 1879, Wilhelm Steinitz published a tribute in The Field in which he annotated Anderssen's two most famous games, the Evergreen and the Immortal Game against Lionel Kieseritzky. Steinitz wrote, "An evergreen in the laurel crown of the departed chess hero", thus giving this game its name.”
Allegedly.
There’s that, but also, “evergreen” has the same meaning as “immortal,” from a certain point of view.
Googled then you copy and pasted
@@Snceday1so what lmao this was 2 years ago
24:05 LCMDLB is extremely lucky that en passant wouldn't become a forced move until later in chess history.
a man of culture u are!
We hadn't scaled up brick production as a society yet. A real lifesaver that this game happened when it did.
Google
@@sucamchi9872 holy hell!
im mad he didnt play it
The thing I love about the Opera Game is what Levy hinted at - chess wasn't anywhere near as well understood at the time. Morphy was figuring out what most chess players now take for granted. He singlehandedly brought chess to the next level, then retired from chess at 22, because he felt it was a frivolous pursuit. Possibly chess's most enigmatic figure.
@@dahcat 🙄
Greco was even more
@@dahcat No, Levy is correct
Chess engines rate him at 2400, but his best opponents rate only at 2100. In fact, no one approached 2400 until Capablanca, nearly 70 years later.
His mother wanted him to focus on his legal practice, but that was not where his head was. His family was rich, so he muttled at lawyering and kept his head down (after a stint of military experience during the Civil War). He was not enthused about the military, not enthused about being a lawyer, not enthused about women and relationships, became "disagreeable" in his 40s, and died of a supposed stroke at age 47.
@@dahcat Hey boring person, make sure you're, you know, not wrong when you correct someone.
Levy I want to thank you for your videos. Since watching, my rating has gone from 1200 to 800 in a week!
Nice
Uh 1200 to 800? Fellow r/anarchychess user?
LOL
400 point difference! truly insane
backward -knight- rating move
Honestly. these videos are so entertaining. From the incredible storytelling to the fact that anyone of any skill level can watch this and still follow along. I have never played a single game of chess in my life and don't know any of the theory, but I still feel the excitement and suspense from start to finish. Thank you for making chess so accessible and fun to everyone!
Yeah I'm surprised too. I found out that as long as you know the rules, you know enough to enjoy watching a game of chess.
Did you start playing?
@@jatoja88 yes, I’m not very good but I try!
They say a perfect chess game ends in a draw, but I think game 3 is a better example of a perfect game: white checkmates black while black has mate in 1.
That’s a terminology conflict
20:37 In game 3 after re7+, what if black play kd8? Then black will win!!
omae wa mou shindeiru
nani
@@mootezbenzekri7806 rxd7, and king can't run from the d rank
@@mootezbenzekri7806 Then simply Rxd7+ Kc8 Rd8+ Kxd8 Bf5+ Qxd1 Qxd1+ Nd4 Bh3 Re8 cxd4 and White is simply winning
The second game is absolutely incredible. Black had the whole army, with the exception of the loss of just 3 pawns, while white had sacrificed both rooks, the queen and a bishop. e5 was crazy to find out. That's a game that really looked unreal. Wow
No actually
Yet it's knight A6 instead of bishop C6 on 14:44 what lost this game, everything before was okay and led to a solid black win.
8:25
Levi: "They would move the their king as early as move 4"
Hikaru and Magnus playing the bong cloud: "OUR goals are beyond your understanding"
Communists!
In fact, judit polgar and boris spaasky both played the bc4 line and happily moved their king to f1 so this isn't one of those "back in the day" situations (ok back in the seventies and eighties maybe)
I just love watching him explain ideas behind their moves, Such enthusiasm and personal like he is playing himself
the octopus knight being so powerful it was worth 9 points of material. That is insane.
should be a boss battle
The most powerful octopus knight to ever live
@@jordanmcmorris5248
In America, you give up Knight for rook.
In Soviet Russia...
Levy's obviously sick at chess but his presentation and teaching skills and his blatant enthusiasm really make these videos. Really fun 36 minutes!
C'mon bro i am sure he is most likely at the very least amount the top 3% of chess players you don't need to be so cruel
Isn’t he like 2400? Way lower than 3%
When Levy said there wasn't gonna be any crazy queen sacs for insane mates with the last game, I was skeptical of how awesome it would be, but I think that's the most beautiful game of Chess I have seen in my life!
Look up kasparovs immortal game. Absolutely stunning
For me it is either Ivanchuks immortal against Kasparov or Capablanca vs Marshall. Both are so damn beautiful.
nah i couldve played that game on blitz, it wasnt as great as andersons
@@nextgenfootball69420 Karpov would crush your family's honour in 10 moves or less you bozo, you are probably sub 1k elo to make such a moronic assumption.
@@woodys9841 shush it, reiTurd, 1'll checkm8 yo M0m in the back ranks
My first chess computer program was Chessmaster 2000 in 1983 on an Apple Iic. I still remember that it had an option where you could call up a few old game, including "Evergreen" and A's "Immortal".
There are slick checkmate and then there is the "3 Pawn End Zone Rush" checkmate that game 4 had. Very wicked.
Game 4, wow. That was so much fun.
Mr. Hornblower, how are you alive
Loved this episode even though I knew most of the games. Would love to see this continued. Especially Bc I feel like older games before so much theory and engines the attacks were so belligerent and are fun to watch
Take a look at Estrin vs Berliner if you haven’t seen it. Kingscrusher has a nice video of it.
th-cam.com/video/1LpLGhCc_CE/w-d-xo.html
These games were insane. Thanks for opening my eyes to the world of chess. There's so much potential in this game and so many stories to tell. You really created a niché for yourself being a great chess player and a great storyteller. Hats off to you
As for the evergreen, steinitz at the time said it was Anderssen' best game and, like a laurel crown, would have remained evergreen and never fade.
A bit over dramatic maybe, but he was definitely right
Edit: had to wiki who said it
hello i just wanna ask about the third game go to 16:43 black can fork the king and the rook with bxc3 ??
@@skys-_7242 - no because then white will take the Bishop on c3 with the Knight.
No list is going to cover everything perfectly, but Kasparov vs. Topalov is yet another fantastic game. I once had the opportunity to ask Kasparov about his personal favorite game, and he selected his game vs. Topalov. If I caught him on a different day, he may have selected his game vs Karpov instead. Both of these games are considered his "immortals", and it's hard to select the "best" one.
Been waiting for a vid like this forever! Thanks for all your grind and effort Levy, you're a legit asset to the game and community of chess and we appreciate all your work!
Agreed.
Lol the bots already
@@alexethan7469 Bots? These are clearly Real Women(TM) who want to get to know you now. Seriously though they were lightning fast. RIP for the poor bastards who actually click those links.
For me, playing chess is about the experience of seeing patterns and visualizing outcomes. There were moves in these games where I didn't know what was about to happen. Thanks Levy, you're a great guide.
Anderssen: one of the best chess players ever
Anderssen's opening: one of the best too
Morphy made him look pretty weak though
@@worsethanjoerogan8061 Morphy made everyone look weak
Wunder if Williham steinitz should stand a chans to Paul Murphy
@@ThePapaja1996 Although they never played each other directly, (not even when Steinitz visited Morphy in New Orleans as Paul sadly refused to even discuss chess with him!), there's a fascinating indirect comparison between them through Anderssen.
While Adolf didn't stand a snowball's chance in hell against Morphy, he actually had a positive score against Steinitz up until 1866 and an about even lifetime score after he got older!
Which speaks volumes about Morphys incredible strength, and that without ever studying the game for even a minute, talk about some natural talent there.... it's unsurpassed to this day... imagine what could have become of Morphy's playing strength had he put similar effort into studying the game like e.g. Bobby did, who lived and breathed chess almost 24/7. And with today's resources... it's beyond imagination, how strong he could have become, who knows, he might have been able to challenge Leela?.. well, maybe not quite, but for sure he could be beyond 3000 ELO today :)
@@worsethanjoerogan8061 He didn't. Morphy just won a few games against him by memorising some openings
Great compilation. One of the best Gotham videos ever. It is a fun to watch and when Levy is in a good mood his comments are great. Well done!
4:19 Imagine Morphy actually calling them bozos
@@melaniee___1486 what the fuck was that
@@uwerlmi6120 bots my man
A nice trivia about The Immortal Game is that it is the the game Sebastian and Tyrell are playing in the film Blade Runner, and, without spoiling too much, Roy Batty's quest to defeat death in that film mirrors the sacrifices of the white pieces.
AMAZING AMAZING COMMENTARY!!!!! One of the best videos on chess games I have seen in a long time. Great job Levy!!!! It's nice that you posted these games of the masters. It was very refreshing to watch. I will revisit this clip in future... Thank you!!!
The last game reminds me of engine games, they maximize the piece activeness with outstanding ideas.
These games were absolutely incredible! Also, I believe the two men in game 4 have opening variations named after them: The McDonnell Attack in the Sicilian Defense (e4, c5, f4) and La Bourdonnais Variation in the French Defense (e4, e6, f4)
The fact the kasparov game isnt called Dark Knight is a shame
First game: "White played a solid game, but black was just moving pieces without a plan... They must be 800, 900 top"
Guess the elo lmao
That's what happens when you're so much ahead of everyone in your time.
It wouldn't surprise me if these guys were actually pretty good players who just didn't know any theory since it was such early times.
@@Lothar445 they were casual players. Morphy played them after being invited to the opera with them, but he wanted to win as fast as possible because he wasn't facing the stage while playing.
Idk why but morphy is so fascinating to me. To me he is the greatest. The fact he’s so old and yet out of all the chess players in history his name is still brought up as one of the best even by people who don’t want to give him credit.
Top tier content, Gotham. Hard to mess up a video about such amazing games but as always you bring so much contagious enthusiasm. We need a sequel.
Please
Those Immortal and Kasparov vs Karpov games were amazing.
The last game reminds me of some of the recent Leela games: sacrifice a pawn for initiative and saying "that pawn hurts you more than me".
Kasparov was so far ahead of his time
When the Queen took at d7 at 20:50 I was staring in disbelief with goose bumps
The choices you made are amazing, i am a big fan of Morphy and De la Bourdonnaise, i never knew the games you showed of Anderssen, i will have to watch them again. I think i would have put a game from Tal and probably the 1956 Fisher Byrne game (i think that's my all time favourite tho)
I just realised i should have actually said Byrne Fisher as Bobby was playing with black 🤦♂️
@@tipemotions Game of the Century or the other one vs the other Byrne?
U cant put a game of Tal for "beginners must know" coz his games are too complicated. Brilliant but too complicated 🙃
@@RMF49 game of the century 👍
At 31:44 If you're interested, the plural of octopus is octopuses in English, oktopodes in Greek, and octopedes in Latin. Octopi is not a word in any language. The reason being, the -i plural is only for 2nd declension masculine nouns with -us as a suffix e.g. gladius (sword) radius, populus etc. -pus is a morpheme meaning 'foot,' not a -us suffix. This means it is pluralised to feet i.e. pedes.
Those games were absolutely stunning! The brilliancy of some of those moves was truly impressive! I never knew chess could be so beautiful, thank you Levy!
th-cam.com/video/1LpLGhCc_CE/w-d-xo.html
That has never occurred to me in the past: watching so many videos from a single YT channel. Levy, your passion for chess worth much more than you could ever imagine. These were fantastic games! 🤩
I think this list is brilliant, but it's missing one more. The 17 pawn moves game shows the incredible power of solid pawn structures and taking space.
What I admire about Anderson is that after losing to Morphy he improved his own game and gave Steinitz fits in their world championship match. That to me is an even greater accomplishment than these two epic games. Loved the video Levi
Definitely is a must video on this channel, love the classics
my guy u have not even seen half of it
Classic games are fun for us noobs. There is no way I can understand GM's moves today. Like I see a move and the GMs be like *moves king from g1 to h1 because of pin in the next 7 moves* like gtfo bro
I'm just starting to learn chess strategy because my son is getting into it. This video was at the perfect level for me. I appreciate how you worked through the moves a little slower but mostly that you explained why those moves were made. Grwat video.
31:20 "It [the knight] isn't going to eat its friend." Good to know, Gotham.
th-cam.com/video/1LpLGhCc_CE/w-d-xo.html
Stunning video! Not only does this thing have amazing games but the blow-by-blow descriptions help modest chess players appreciate the battle of titans. Very well done. I have goosebumps.
To me Morphy's Opera game is the Titanic of chess games. So simple yet so epic. It's the most iconic chess game in my eyes. Whoever is silly enough to criticize a Morphy's move during that game as sub-optimal forgets that these moves are golden, much superior and more artistic than any other engine move and these golden moves make what this game is. A masterpiece.
Stienetz said "Morphy should have played Qxb7, and not was sub par play". Lasker also said the same. This lead to one of the most Gangster Chess quotes of all time "Qxb7 is a *BUTCHER'S* Move! Morphy is an Artist!"
Levy, I noticed a similar use of the Octopus Knight on d3 in the Fischer-R. Byrne game in the 1963 US Championship. In fact, Byrne has his Queen and Rook aligned up identically behind the Knight as in the Kasparov game. The knight in this case did not stay there long but was used with lethal effect as a sac on f2 with the game ending at around move 21. That Fischer went 11-0 in this tourney speaks to his prowess at the time. Fischer has a way of burning the Byrne Brothers (pun intended).
You always post diverse and quality content, like going over past chess games and then all your series plus reviews of the world championship like damn
th-cam.com/video/1LpLGhCc_CE/w-d-xo.html
Awesome video! Would like to see this series continue with more historic games!
You should make a part 2 for this with games like steinitz vs von bardeleben and byrne vs Fischer. There are so many games as good and famous as those in the video
th-cam.com/video/1LpLGhCc_CE/w-d-xo.html
Ty for this video, I'm new to chess and your explanations alone helped me improve my approach to strategy. Also, the tree does make a sound if no one is around to hear it. Simply because sound waves exist despite no one being around to perceive them.
Anderssen was a truly chess genius, absolute amazing games!
What is truly fascinating about the Immortal Game is that it's not a perfect game for White, unlike the Evergreen, in which Anderssen's only dubious move was 17.Nf6+. Anderssen made lots of mistakes as well in the Immortal, but for how chess was analysed (without engines, of course) back in the day, it appeared like a supreme gem in the history of chess. White often lost advantage in that game: 18.Bd6 is a mistake. Kieseritzky didn't see the Queen sacrifice and thought that 20...Na6 was the correct move to prevent mate on c7, but if you put the position on any engine, it will show you that moving the Bishop, thus creating an escape square for the King, leaves White with just a small advantage, given by the opportunity to win back the sacrificed material. It really teaches a lesson on how chess changed: pre-Lasker/Capablanca chess was just a different thing from the cold-blooded Cold-War Sicilians and stuff.
I think you should have added the game with the king walk, the game of the century by Bobby Fischer, some game by Mikhail Tal and the game from Garry Kasparov with the insane calculations.
That would be Kasparov-Topalov with the double rook sac.
He did a video there he talk about that game.
@@ThePapaja1996 but he also did a video on the opera game
@@abj136 Not necessarily. There is another game of Kasparov beating Karpov in a wc match where the video is entitled 'Kasparov's insane calculations'.
Broooo the three musketeer pawns are the real mvp!!!! Absolute savage!!!!!
3:42 best voicecrack
I've been working night shifts and just watching your videos. They teach me a lot of ways to use pawns, use the h/a pawns and how to use diagonals that do not cross the center. Thank you for being a nice talkative dude. Would love to play sometime!
On a side note, I expected you would put a Mikhael Tal game on here, as you were a big fan of him in another video
You could have done like 5 + bonus with that amazing game with the King run with King up one square mate (sadly i don't remember who played it), that would have been perfect
Short-Timman 1993
@@caseywhieldon2506 ty man
@@caseywhieldon2506 nope it is Edward Lasker vs George Alan Thomas (1912)
31:46 it actually is octopuses. The ruling on whether the word gets changed to "-pi" or "-uses" simply depends on whether it's Latin or Greek in origin.
This was fun. I am relatively new to chess, so yes, these games are a real treat and now I want more. Thank you!
That opera game was mad. Sacrifices everything for a win
Chess before computers!! Daring and creativity showing the magic chess can be. Going to replay this video the next time I see two SGMs agree to a tournament draw after 8 moves. Thanks for the hard work!!
16:54 I've heard about the Evans gambit two days ago by watching a video who tells us to crush weak opponents and make them cry by using that opening.
Hey Gotham, can you please do a video on 'how to convert opening advantages into a win, in the middle game'? I struggle with that at times. My rating is 1500 and I can tell i have won the opening battle, but I still somehow play into a position where opponent somehow equalizes and my advantage is gone. It's frustrating.
I think the 5-th game should have been the game between Kasparov VS Topalov whith the double rook sacrfices. This is widley considered as the best game of all time and Kasparov said that this is the best game he ever played.
I was literally a biggener at chess.... after watching your videos i am now a grandmaster in clickbaiting
"You were paying attention but you forgot because chess is hard".
Damn dude..
well yes, it does make a sound, if we are defining sound as particles vibrating in air, even if no one is there, the falling of the tree will still physically affect its environment, its impact will produce a sound because the pressure exerted on the air around the falling tree is physically affected by the tree creating waves of vibrating air particles which moves outward from its center affecting the surrounding environment
Valid point, although even if you define sound like that, you can only hypothesize that it must have made a sound, not knowing the time it would happen. There is no way to test this, since it would not satisfy the question's requisite of no one being there to hear the supposed sound. I don't believe that hypothesis is a prediction, in conclusion. Also, if you define a sound more abstractly, how most humans would define it, the question answers itself. In more detail, a sound is something that is heard, but no one heard the supposed sound of the tree falling, so it's not a sound.
I'm standing on a technicality, basically: time. Saying a tree has fallen is different than saying a tree fell. When you examine the fallen tree you conclude to the first statement, time unspecified. Consequently, you can't know the sound that could have been made either, since the type of sound is a function of time of fall (because of chaos theory, a system like this is sensitive to initial conditions) which is unknown. So if you don't know these, how can you confirm the 'sound'.
And all of that is after forgetting the simple fact that the question is impossible since it is highly likely that the tree falling would affect at least one person. As you said, vibrating air particles move outward affecting the surrounding environment, and at least a human, even infinitesimally. To summarize, the premise of this question is wrong.
Take a breath Einstein
"5:40 "if you're up a few pieces but you cannot move a piece, are you really up thee pieces?" AlfaZero Says "NO, take this Fish".
Beautiful games and commentary
27:00 Queen captured Bishop then rook c8 this is a best move for white.
Liked before I even started watching. I needed a story time with gotham for too long now!
5:50 funny, I was having a mathematical discussion about the origins of mathematics while looking at this idea and yeah, assuming a typical forest I think it does, you no one may hear it, but the vibrations when hitting the ground will change the state of the atoms of electrons in both, the ground and the tree, by the vibrations it will make from the change in energy, and even if it is for a tiny fraction, the states were altered which leads puts for certain that it made a sound which is just vibrations from impact.
Virgin knowing a famous instructive game between two of the best players in the world
vs
CHAD knowing the first game where you beat your dad
20:10 Rd1 is the key attacking move, sacrificing the knight. This is the hard move to find! To set up a complete checkmate. Chef's kiss
keep up the interesting content man, it is greatly appreciated :D
That shutting the door and beating everyone up example was pretty badass. I now imagine the guy who played that move as a pure badass character. Thanks, Levi for making chess so fun!
This video was perfectly balanced in the amount of humor and instructive content. Well done Levy!
Heya, sorry for the really late comment but I have just a quick question about this Anderson game at @14:40 where black unknowingly blunders by moving their knight to A6 for like... No reason at all, aside from just not anticipating what white was planning , since they were quite complex moves. What about if first black moved their C8 bishop to B7 to attack the knight and then pretty much regardless of what white would do next, should be able to bring their G1 bishop up to C6 to attack white's bishop that is on D6? Would that have been enough to prevent that checkmate?
Can we just acknowledge that this guy has been making vids for us for only a year now?
@Kilfa Nara shut up everyone gets a seizure reading ur messages and spam
i love how you always say in the latter parts of the video 'if we had enough patience to stick this far'.
bro. youre the goat in chess youtube, your viewers are most likely goat in chess youtube watching too. haha. cheers from hk bro. awesome stuff. hope to learn here
Great video! I've seen some of these before, but your explanations are entertaining and informative. Thanks.
Great video dude! I think I've seen most of these games at one point or another but I love how you presented them all and how you strung them together. Thanks!
This is a wonderful series. I'm just a 600 Elo player, but I'm absolutely fascinated by breakdowns like this.
27:45 best game I have ever seen we should call this the million dollar game better than the golden coins game
Wow....these games are givinge chills with the outside of the box thinking these men used. It makes me feel like a monkey cause im just sitting here knowing dam well my brain could have never EVER thought in such a way
I really love these games and your videos are amazing. Keep up with the good work brotha
Ok ok ok... Kasperov's game plan of not using minor pieces to do the taking even when it's perfectly possible is amazing. Out of the 5 recaps, Kasperov's is the best here.
*Kasparov
I actually taught Paul how to play an effective defense with the white pieces. He got pretty good after a while.
19:55 IM FUCKING DEAD😭
Man you're one of a kind... this channel of yours is Amazing. U talk about chess as if it's the most enjoyable thing in the world... I love it
Levy always pins a negative comment. So here goes.... Levy is so bad at chess he would've attempted the scholar's mate on the first movie of harry potter if he was casted as harry.
Thats not how it works.
9:33 everybody gangsta until the bishop switches colors
BEST VIDEO EVER BY LEVY
19:11 Ne4 adds a layer of defense in case of Nxe4; Nxe4, Qxg2#
Who’s watching in 2026
Where are my bros from 2028
It 2024
Nah, it’s 2029 for me
Time dilation hitting hard
@@Melvin-nt9xu this black hole is actually quite nice
Adolf Anderssens Immortal Game was like a Stockfish one,sacrificing for position and thinking ahead!
Very intriguing
Day 27 of lying about how many days i’ve been commenting
Nice humour
@@andrewdavies7720 thanks dude
A paradox
22:30 That f4 arrow would be the McDonnel attack (the guy with the white pieces). Not so unlikely. :)