Why I Am Not a Buddhist
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ก.ย. 2024
- Is Buddhism uniquely compatible with modern science? Do its ideas and practices have a better handle on the nature of the human mind than other spiritual systems? Dr. Evan Thompson grew up on a Buddhist commune and went on to become a professional philosopher. This has given him a unique and fascinating perspective on the nature of one of the world's most interesting and impactful religions.
02:26 What is Buddhism?
08:48 Is it uniquely compatible with modern science?
14:22 Why did Buddhists feel that they needed to be seen as "scientific?"
19:27 How does Karma know what is right and wrong?
25:21 Why are Buddhist philosophers uninterested in the ultimate origins of existence?
30:48 Why are Jews so attracted to Buddhism?
36:32 Where does Buddhist moral philosophy come from?
44:40 Why is Buddhism so focused on the idea of suffering?
48:14 Where are you on your spiritual journey?
Explore more at www.beyondbeli...
For more content from Evan Thompson visit evanthompson.me/
Find the book Why I am not a Buddhist evanthompson.m...
I have always said that in the West (I’m from the States) we don’t have much access to the Buddhist religion, but we have a lot of access to Buddhist thought. That is to say, while westerners adopt meditation, many of them do not seek to do “shamatha” or “vipassana” but rather some relaxation stuff that has nothing to do with the Path. Or I hear westerners call Buddhism more of a sciene/way of life than a belief system. Many “secular Buddhists” do not claim to be secular, and that’s my issue. You must understand the dharma require a level of faith, as many things in it simply are not possibly in our modern day world. But many will say “yeah I’m a Buddhist but don’t believe in reincarnation, just like being a peaceful kind person”. Kindness/compassion is not the ONLY quality you need to grow, and it’s kind of important that if you’re identifying as a Buddhist that you understand most of what we do is supposed by one, wanting to make other happy, but two, to be ensure a better rebirth IF NOT nirvana in this lifetime. Better to say you are just an ethical person inspired by the Buddhas teachings.
TLDR, despite what westerners say, Buddhism IS a religion with beliefs and myths and all that. And I love it. NAMO BUDDHAYA ❤
Good for you man. I am a Buddhist.
As a Tibetan Buddhist of a decade or so this was a very interesting and well hosted discussion.
Thanks for a good talk. Dukkha is not suffering, more like unsatisfactory. Ram Dass doesn't sound like he was 'suffering' from a Buddhist sense, he was totally at peace with his condition.
Also, if any of you would like to get a deeper idea, have a look at Teravada Buddhist monks like Yuttadhammo, Bhikku Bodhi, Ajahn Brahm and so on.
Excellent conversation and choice of questions!!
Excellent! I feel very glad for you that at the beginning of your journey into Buddhism you managed to have a chat with a person like Evan who can stop you going down so many rabbit holes of delusion which people seeking to free themselves of delusion generally tend to throw themselves down with abandon 😅🔥
The argument is based on interpretation: whose light is brighter 🔆
When you're explaining you're losing. Sgt. Rock
Buddha's alleged words were recorded 500 years after his death
Why not simply acknowledge that there are aspects of Buddhism that speak to certain aspects of Science? And vice versa? The need to go further risks essentializing both. Likewise the concept of “modernity’ itself - which Evan leaves curiously unexamined.
Evan is doing intellectual analyses of the Buddhist teachings, without engaging in meditation/mindfulness and without trying to understand the teachings within himself. I also felt that he is dogmatically clinging to the ‘scientific method.’ There is a HUGE limit to what science can do to understand the mind (subjective experiences) because science is focused on objectivity and measuring of things. In meditation, one can become aware of one’s own experiences in the *present moment,* and see for oneself things like the arising/ceasing (impermanent) nature of each experienced moment, etc. - this leads to experientially understanding the three marks of existence - they are DEFINITELY not blind beliefs! In Buddhism, the mind, etc., is very clearly explained (it is exceptional in that sense), and that is the reason why people of other religions (Jews) learn Buddhism to understand things better. Rebirth also has a LOT of evidence where thousands of cases of children with memories of previous lives have been verified/studied by researchers like Dr. Ian Stevenson, Jim Tucker, etc. For example, the following article lists many references: Stevenson, Ian. "The phenomenon of claimed memories of previous lives: possible interpretations and importance." _Medical Hypotheses_ 54.4 (2000): 652-659.
I was in many, oriental and new age religions,, and many christian denominations,,,and TODAY,,i can say from experience,,,that,,every religion and philosophy contain truth,,,, BUT,,,, ONLY ORTHODOX JUDAISM HAS THE ABSOLUTE PRISTINE TRUTH 👍🏻🕎
Useful information. Shabbat Shalom.
Wow truth....what truth?...
@@toddm6999
The truth of ONLY ONE ABSOLUTE GD,, THERE IS NOTHING OUTSIDE OF GD,,NO TRINITY ,, NO TRIADS AS IN HINDUISM,, THERE IS NO OTHER,, HE DOES NOT NEED ANY ASSISTANCE,,for example like the watch tower christian cult believes,, they claim that unlike other christians they do not accept the trinity,,, ect.... but at the same time they believe that michael the arch angel is actually jesus,, and that GD needed his help to create..,,,. islam on the other hand believes in only one god,,, but,,, like the christians also believes in a Satan,,, that has free will and is against GD,, judaism also rejects this concept,, bc it is not in tanakh....ect...🕎
@@Tommy321
th-cam.com/video/fBy71RLx8xQ/w-d-xo.html
@@toddm6999
th-cam.com/video/nQE8YhYSuS4/w-d-xo.html
Regarding how ‘good & bad’ got sorted in Buddhism - this is explained in the discourse _“Dvedhavitakka Sutta: Two Sorts of Thinking"_ (MN 19) - basically it explains how the Buddha divided his thoughts into two categories, and decided to cultivate just one group of thoughts (that relate to 'letting go' and 'good will') because he noticed that these thoughts lead to beneficial outcomes for not only for oneself, but for others as well, and is also conducive to wisdom. Regarding how ‘sexual misconduct’ is explained in Buddhism, I suggest reading the book titled _‘The Noble Eightfold Path - The Way to the End of Suffering,’_ by Bhikku Bodhi (pdf available for free online).
Christianity is different than Buddhism. Buddhism comes across as a bunch of practices that bring a sense of harmony in the mind. Christianity to me is a religion and faith which requires alot of function, not just the mind and certain personal thoughts, but ability, mentality, emotions, and focus. The entity of body soul and spirit. This makes Christianity true, the fact that a natural mentality and harmonious mind cannot understand the function of a developed Christian mindset. The mindset of a true spiritual man is Holy Spirit led and focused.
I don't understand. How is this different from Buddhism, which as a full complex set of faith-based teachings, has all that you list. I don't see the fundamental difference. (Not that I think you're incorrect about Christianity, but it sounds like you've taken a bit from the modern secular Buddhists and McMindfulness and taken it to be the whole)
49:31
Not sure if Asian group dynamics are all that better. Different, but not better. There are many stories coming out that humans are humans. Be it the Dalai Lama or Alan Watts.
As much as I love animals, including tigers, I am a mother first. That makes me protect my son and his future a priority. My vision of the future of my son includes healthy community, healthy environment (multiple meanings of environmentS), meaningful life and a world with justice and freedom.
This will not be achieved by being a peace of meat for any tiger. (It also includes a healthy environment for tigers too, although there I am not a piece of meat.)
Human predators are a whole other chapter. They are not even in the same category as tigers.
Evan's career has in no small part been founded on the scientizing of Buddhism. He must be aware of this, at the very least as a money stream but also as much more as he knows very well. So I wonder how he now sees his relation to this thing he is now critiquing but of which he is also a part. Does he scour his own thoughts for the traces of this shift or does he maintain coherency through denial, or what? I should finish reading his book I suppose.
Interesting, do you have some examples of the scientizing?
There are Muslim Buddhist in India 😊
Who cares?