Drona shouldn't had done this to Ekalavya only because he's better than Arjuna..😢where as Ekalavya truly and devotedly considered dronacharya as his gurudev...it's a shame to a guru!
That's what happens when stories are not told properly. While I am greatful for this piece on TH-cam, it is not satisfying as Ramayana by Rajshri Souls. Deep study and complete picture is not there. Eklavya was no ordinary tribal boy. He was son of Tribal King who was arch enemy of Kuru Dynasty. This was a strategic move by Drona and Eklavya in first place should not have approached him. My expectations from the podcast are falling as I proceed
the story of Mahabharata retold by you is amazing 🤩 but in this episode you should mention about Eklavya family background in details that his father belonged to king jarasandh and he also wanted to serve as a military in future for Jarasandh regime. There was enmity between KURU AND JARASANDH regime. Aacharya Dron was obliged to kuru dynasty so giving training to Eklavya or let him to be powerful in future would be strategic mistake. So in our perspective it would be morally wrong but sometimes one had to show dual morality when one was part of administration
It was not about strategy it's about getting the education wrong way, eklavya steal the education that's why that education wasn't belong to. Him. So drona has to punish him and find a way to take back his teachings
@@AnkitPal-ku7tp The Mahabharata does not provide explicit details about Eklavya hiding in bushes. The commonly accepted version of the story is that Eklavya observed Dronacharya's teachings from a distance and practiced on his own using a clay idol of Dronacharya as his guru. This implies that he maintained a respectful distance and learned through observation and self-discipline. The idea of hiding in bushes might be a more dramatic interpretation, but the essence of the story is about Eklavya's dedication and ingenuity in learning archery without direct instruction from Dronacharya.
@@AnkitPal-ku7tp guru drona asked his thumb to eliminate the future threat from eklavya kingdom (Nishadas) This was the only fault of eklavya that he was from other kingdom
Why not you mention the eklavya family background he is son of Ekalavya's adoptive father, Hiranyadhanus, was the commander of the most powerful king of the period, Jarasandha and Ekalavya himself served under King Jarasandha's army as a general.
14:34 A thumb is not required for archery for one and Drona was only supposed to teach the noble of Hastinapur, not the students from other kingdoms as it would be a treachery against the Kurus.
We don't know if it requires or not. But having a thumb in an archery can help you. We don't know about divine archery. Can't say that for sure. As for the Eklavya from other Kingdom that's why drona didn't teach him. That could be possible. But drona never taught him at the first place. Eklavya was self taught student. He considered himself as a student of Dronacharya. But drona didn't teach him anything.
How do you propose holding a bow under pressure without a thumb? I think you’re thinking you don’t need a thumb to handle the arrows, but think about the other hand: you are going to pull the string of the bow towards you, so you need a thumb to use your bow hand to push the bow the other way. Without a thumb that’s very difficult.
I was waiting for one of the disciples request to Drona for Brahmastra and the denial and the disciple getting angry and leaving Ashrama. That episode has not come in. Not sure why this willing ignorance.
Excuse me: there are several nuances; first of all Eklavya was the son of the king of Nishaad, secondly, that Nishad king was against the kurus so why should the guru teaching kurus teach
DRONACHARYA WAS A CROOK who didn't wanted EKLAVYA to be. More powerful than Arjuna. Because EKLAVYA WAS A SHUDRA, THE CROOK DRONACHARYA DECIDED TO DEMAND HIS FINGER
Ill educated people are different from uneducated ones and more deadly as Bhagvat Gita. Eklavya should have never approached Drona, it was his strategic move. He was none other than crown prince of King of Nishad and Jarasang was arch enemy of Kurus. Then why would Drona teach him ? It was a strategic counter attack on enemy camp by Drona
"the story of Mahabharata retold by you is amazing 🤩 but in this episode you should mention about Eklavya family background in details that his father belonged to king jarasandh and he also wanted to serve as a military in future for Jarasandh regime. There was enmity between KURU AND JARASANDH regime. Aacharya Dron was obliged to kuru dynasty so giving training to Eklavya or let him to be powerful in future would be strategic mistake. So in our perspective it would be morally wrong but sometimes one had to show dual morality when one was part of administration "
another imaginary story !.. Drona was a tree passer on his way to his relatives house and used dry paddy grass to lift the cork ball , till than boys did not had permision to play with weapons
What do you mean? According to what Sudipta narrated, Drona didnt teach Eklavya anything. Ekalavya practised on his own, and looked up to Drona as his teacher and that is why made a clay statue of him to imagine him. He didnt steal Drona's education, it was wrong of Drona to do this. According to the other comments, it seems there were some administrative reasons why Drona did this, related to Jarasandha.
@@nilupilu brother don't look thers comments they don't know, I know full Mahabharata, eklavya imagined drona as his guru but drona never know about eklavya used to watch dronas teachings when he teach other kids
@@nilupilu I mean he secretaly peek at his teachings and as anyone says that it was administrative that will be wrong drona was a great man he cannot take someone thumb just for administrative reasons
DRONACHARYA WAS A CROOK who didn't wanted EKLAVYA to be. More powerful than Arjuna. Because EKLAVYA WAS A SHUDRA, THE CROOK DRONACHARYA DECIDED TO DEMAND HIS FINGER
DRONACHARYA WAS A CROOK who didn't wanted EKLAVYA to be. More powerful than Arjuna. Because EKLAVYA WAS A SHUDRA, THE CROOK DRONACHARYA DECIDED TO DEMAND HIS FINGER
DRONACHARYA WAS A CROOK who didn't wanted EKLAVYA to be. More powerful than Arjuna. Because EKLAVYA WAS A SHUDRA, THE CROOK DRONACHARYA DECIDED TO DEMAND HIS FINGER
How human could make blunder : celestial level
Drona shouldn't had done this to Ekalavya only because he's better than Arjuna..😢where as Ekalavya truly and devotedly considered dronacharya as his gurudev...it's a shame to a guru!
That's what happens when stories are not told properly. While I am greatful for this piece on TH-cam, it is not satisfying as Ramayana by Rajshri Souls. Deep study and complete picture is not there. Eklavya was no ordinary tribal boy. He was son of Tribal King who was arch enemy of Kuru Dynasty. This was a strategic move by Drona and Eklavya in first place should not have approached him. My expectations from the podcast are falling as I proceed
the story of Mahabharata retold by you is amazing 🤩
but in this episode you should mention about Eklavya family background in details that his father belonged to king jarasandh
and he also wanted to serve as a military in future for Jarasandh regime.
There was enmity between KURU AND JARASANDH regime.
Aacharya Dron was obliged to kuru dynasty so giving training to Eklavya or let him to be powerful in future would be strategic mistake. So in our perspective it would be morally wrong but sometimes one had to show dual morality when one was part of administration
It was not about strategy it's about getting the education wrong way, eklavya steal the education that's why that education wasn't belong to. Him. So drona has to punish him and find a way to take back his teachings
@@AnkitPal-ku7tpcan you explain how he steal the education
@@KrishnaYadav-ob2hp eklavya used to hide in the bushes and watch dronas teaching
@@AnkitPal-ku7tp The Mahabharata does not provide explicit details about Eklavya hiding in bushes. The commonly accepted version of the story is that Eklavya observed Dronacharya's teachings from a distance and practiced on his own using a clay idol of Dronacharya as his guru. This implies that he maintained a respectful distance and learned through observation and self-discipline.
The idea of hiding in bushes might be a more dramatic interpretation, but the essence of the story is about Eklavya's dedication and ingenuity in learning archery without direct instruction from Dronacharya.
@@AnkitPal-ku7tp guru drona asked his thumb to eliminate the future threat from eklavya kingdom (Nishadas)
This was the only fault of eklavya that he was from other kingdom
Why not you mention the eklavya family background he is son of Ekalavya's adoptive father, Hiranyadhanus, was the commander of the most powerful king of the period, Jarasandha and Ekalavya himself served under King Jarasandha's army as a general.
So glad that you revealed the truth! Next he will say that jaati and all that
Heartbreaking...
14:34 A thumb is not required for archery for one and Drona was only supposed to teach the noble of Hastinapur, not the students from other kingdoms as it would be a treachery against the Kurus.
We don't know if it requires or not. But having a thumb in an archery can help you. We don't know about divine archery. Can't say that for sure.
As for the Eklavya from other Kingdom that's why drona didn't teach him. That could be possible. But drona never taught him at the first place. Eklavya was self taught student. He considered himself as a student of Dronacharya. But drona didn't teach him anything.
How do you propose holding a bow under pressure without a thumb? I think you’re thinking you don’t need a thumb to handle the arrows, but think about the other hand: you are going to pull the string of the bow towards you, so you need a thumb to use your bow hand to push the bow the other way. Without a thumb that’s very difficult.
That's freaking unrighteous!
I was waiting for one of the disciples request to Drona for Brahmastra and the denial and the disciple getting angry and leaving Ashrama. That episode has not come in. Not sure why this willing ignorance.
SIR WHAT IS THE SOURCE OF THIS STORY
Excuse me: there are several nuances; first of all Eklavya was the son of the king of Nishaad, secondly, that Nishad king was against the kurus so why should the guru teaching kurus teach
Everything has a reason... Let it come...
Nicely explained sir
DRONACHARYA WAS A CROOK who didn't wanted EKLAVYA to be. More powerful than Arjuna.
Because EKLAVYA WAS A SHUDRA, THE CROOK DRONACHARYA DECIDED TO DEMAND HIS FINGER
Ill educated people are different from uneducated ones and more deadly as Bhagvat Gita. Eklavya should have never approached Drona, it was his strategic move. He was none other than crown prince of King of Nishad and Jarasang was arch enemy of Kurus. Then why would Drona teach him ? It was a strategic counter attack on enemy camp by Drona
Thats bad of Drona. Or is the story left out?
"the story of Mahabharata retold by you is amazing 🤩
but in this episode you should mention about Eklavya family background in details that his father belonged to king jarasandh
and he also wanted to serve as a military in future for Jarasandh regime.
There was enmity between KURU AND JARASANDH regime.
Aacharya Dron was obliged to kuru dynasty so giving training to Eklavya or let him to be powerful in future would be strategic mistake. So in our perspective it would be morally wrong but sometimes one had to show dual morality when one was part of administration
"
another imaginary story !.. Drona was a tree passer on his way to his relatives house and used dry paddy grass to lift the cork ball , till than boys did not had permision to play with weapons
❤❤❤
Drona 😡😡
.
The background music is a bit annoying
Whoa whoa whoa…take that comment back..
@@shivamagrawal5257get lost nlgga
no its not :(
Eklavya stole his education that education did not belong to him so drona has to punish him and take back his teachings
Tribals are natural warriors so eklavya but did not had technical concept of archery
@@manjulav376 whatever, I am only explaining why drona had to take his thumb
What do you mean? According to what Sudipta narrated, Drona didnt teach Eklavya anything. Ekalavya practised on his own, and looked up to Drona as his teacher and that is why made a clay statue of him to imagine him. He didnt steal Drona's education, it was wrong of Drona to do this. According to the other comments, it seems there were some administrative reasons why Drona did this, related to Jarasandha.
@@nilupilu brother don't look thers comments they don't know, I know full Mahabharata, eklavya imagined drona as his guru but drona never know about eklavya used to watch dronas teachings when he teach other kids
@@nilupilu I mean he secretaly peek at his teachings and as anyone says that it was administrative that will be wrong drona was a great man he cannot take someone thumb just for administrative reasons
DRONACHARYA WAS A CROOK who didn't wanted EKLAVYA to be. More powerful than Arjuna.
Because EKLAVYA WAS A SHUDRA, THE CROOK DRONACHARYA DECIDED TO DEMAND HIS FINGER
Aye
DRONACHARYA WAS A CROOK who didn't wanted EKLAVYA to be. More powerful than Arjuna.
Because EKLAVYA WAS A SHUDRA, THE CROOK DRONACHARYA DECIDED TO DEMAND HIS FINGER
DRONACHARYA WAS A CROOK who didn't wanted EKLAVYA to be. More powerful than Arjuna.
Because EKLAVYA WAS A SHUDRA, THE CROOK DRONACHARYA DECIDED TO DEMAND HIS FINGER
Keep putting your comment for 3 more times, they say 7 is a lucky number 😂