OJ Simpson Deposition - (Day 5) Jan 26th 1996 - Part 1/5

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 ก.พ. 2020
  • Rarely-seen footage, this is the fifth day of O.J. Simpson's five-day deposition in the civil lawsuit brought against him by the families of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman.
    This is the first time Simpson has answered questions under oath about his activities just before, during and after the murders.
    Note: O.J. Simpson was deposed for the originally scheduled five days between Jan 22-Jan 26, 1996. One month later he was recalled & deposed for 4 more days (Feb 22-23 & Feb 26-27, 1996). In total, O.J. Simpson's deposition took 9 days.
    Present in the room are -
    Defendant: O.J. Simpson
    Representatives: Bob Baker, Daniel Leonard & Robert Blasier
    Plaintiff: Fred Goldman
    Representatives: Daniel Petrocell, Arthur Groman, Edward Medvene, Peter Gelblum & Yvette Molinaro
    Michael Brewer (for Plaintiff Sharon Rufo)
    John Kelly (for Plaintiff Louis Brown & the Estate of Nicole Brown)
    Videographer: Rod Rigole
    Examination by Daniel Petrocelli

ความคิดเห็น • 81

  • @StickhandlingwithPC
    @StickhandlingwithPC 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    It's revealing that he describes the Bruno Maglis as 'ugly ass shoes'. That's why, out of all his shoes, he chose them to wear for the murders.

  • @Anita-ee4bs
    @Anita-ee4bs 4 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Cracking job Dan Petrocelli 👏

  • @rebeccahsmith1640
    @rebeccahsmith1640 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Petrocelli kicks ass

  • @marcrigor6423
    @marcrigor6423 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Who's OJ getting these clothes from, Charlie Brown?

    • @dixiedeed4918
      @dixiedeed4918 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He buying from Fred Goldman

  • @danielmccoy8875
    @danielmccoy8875 4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    I would lose gloves..lol no kidding Juice

  • @SugoiEnglish1
    @SugoiEnglish1 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    25: 24 minutes Bruno Magli shoes discussed. I've never seen pair of "Bruno Magli shoes in my closet." LOL. 30 photos of the killer wearing them.

  • @blue-calla
    @blue-calla 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    27:22 is the part I’ve seen so many ppl ask about throughout these depo videos. 😊 Idk which video shows his priceless reaction when he realized Petrocelli has a photo of him wearing those shoes.

    • @blue-calla
      @blue-calla 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      You can find a short clip of that moment by searching the following, but his eyes bugging out are at the first second:
      Oj simpson picture bruno magli shoes

    • @michaelceraso1977
      @michaelceraso1977 หลายเดือนก่อน

      yea I forget what was the reason this wasnt used (maybe no confirmation of his buyin and owning those "ugly ass shoes") in the trial. His blood, his shoe print match, his Bronco and that lady who got his license plate driving fast from the scene should have been, used even if she made money from that Enquirer like paper

  • @loganbothwell543
    @loganbothwell543 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    He remembers the tiniest details until the night of the murders. He apparently did black out like in his book. Tried to help troubled people a week before the murders! 😂😂😂

  • @Contractnik
    @Contractnik 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Petrocelli's paper flips when OJ says: Bloomingdale's...lol...and then Petrocelli asks him about it in-depth. Did Nicole shop there with you? You're apartment in NYC is close to Bloomingdale's? And OJ gives the exact address...between Lexington and 3rd...LOL...setting him up for the Bruno Magli shoes. They have the photo that the DA didn't have. Him wearing the Bruno Magli shoes that were purchased at Bloomingdale's.

  • @pommiebears
    @pommiebears 4 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    So...he didn’t own a pair of Bruno Magli shoes.....until he did, lol. Those pictures of him in those shoes were published 9 months before the murders, by a Buffalo Bills magazine tribute.....to OJ!! The irony is not lost on anyone 😂

    • @jtkbigk77
      @jtkbigk77 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Just showed up right on time for the Civil Trial? Convenient.

    • @garethwilby4033
      @garethwilby4033 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      jtkbigk77 I’d say it was inconvenient that they didn’t show up before the criminal trial,don’t even dare suggest that they are fake,its impossible that paper is a matter of public record BEFORE the murders!

    • @pommiebears
      @pommiebears 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      jtkbigk77 I think it decidedly inconvenient that they didn’t show up in time for the criminal trial, to be perfectly honest with you. Man got away with a double murder. If you don’t believe he did, you’re either in strong denial....or you’re completely stupid.

    • @jtkbigk77
      @jtkbigk77 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Pommie bears ouch

    • @NeverGiddy
      @NeverGiddy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@pommiebears - You are convinced he did it. What is your timeline for the crime? Is it Marcia Clark's timeline or do you have your own? What's your version of what happened that night?

  • @jumpropestairs6129
    @jumpropestairs6129 ปีที่แล้ว

    did you review any documents?

    • @mprsv1
      @mprsv1  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      i was going to but my dog chewed them all up.

  • @fatsonot181
    @fatsonot181 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I don't understand, why these guys didn't pursue the company that made the Bruno shoes and get them to confirm sale invoice / payment receipt of all 299 shoes ever sold and if one of them was OJ.. was that really hard?
    What makes Bruno Magli shoes so different aesthetically that nobody can copy it? There might be look a likes also that may be in the photos? Or is there no chances of that?

    • @lopez2011ism
      @lopez2011ism 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Nicole is the one that bought him these supposedly only she would know where they were bought and if she still had or didn't have the receipt. He doesn't seem like the kind of guy to remember brands he bought or owns even when asked about tennis shoes he wears it doesn't know the brands just what they may look like ....I think she was the one to do majority of the shopping around and gift buying. I very much doubt Bruno magli had a store ...she probably bought them at a department store if there were only 229 made in the US

  • @llcool8778
    @llcool8778 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why is turning the lights on/off why is that relevant?

  • @blue-calla
    @blue-calla 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    At 9:03, this is just one of many examples where OJ adds extra details when it’s not necessary. It’s almost always when he’s triggered and almost always to disparage Nicole (not this time). He just can’t help himself but the more info, the better, lol. His snide remark here added about a minute of extra questioning.

  • @TaC0Man909
    @TaC0Man909 ปีที่แล้ว

    Interesting

  • @leonaanita719
    @leonaanita719 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    If I were officials who bumped of a high guardian, I would be terrified, & what u have allowed to happen

  • @olerauter72
    @olerauter72 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Listen with your brain turned on, if you have one.

  • @nattyps3160
    @nattyps3160 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Anyone know the deposition video discussing the threatening letter by oj or his attorney only a couple months b4 the murder to nicole about how oj was going to report her for tax evasion! Basically nicole owned the home she & the kids lived in at bundy but their was some tax snag where nicole was still filing taxes using ojs Rockingham residence. Their are so many tax laws that obviously oj s lawyer found was illegal by nicole. I don't know why nicole using ojs home was a tax issue or why how nicole was financially benefitting by not claiming bundy as her residence. I'd think she'd get tax breaks for owning her own home. It's not like she lived at Rockingham & was renting out bundy & hiding profits. Unless nicole was somehow not paying taxes at bundy but I can't imagine she wasn't paying taxes cause her town was collecting those taxes not the federal government directly. That's why I'd love to see that part b/c a. I'm curious how nicole was possibly benefitting. It can't be the months Kato payed very little rent to nicole & I think that's when she lived at Gretna green. She had moved to bundy sometime from the 911 call in 93 to her murder in June 94 cause that was bundy drive. I think oj said Kato moved in at ojs b/c nicole was moving. I don't buy oj just being a " good guy " to give some random guy nicole had move in to pay rent she deducted in exchange for babysitting. Oj wanted Kato completely away from living w/ or on Nicole's property & I don't believe oj found him to be at all a romantic threat. Not one word about that ever came about. I honestly think nicole & Kato were friends at most & she saw he was a very harmless easy going guy who her kids loved so much they named her dog Kato.
    Also I thought that was major evidence how cut throat oj was being w/ nicole for finally ending their trial reconciliation after they divorced.

    • @andricorayford
      @andricorayford 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's the video before this one

  • @dixiedeed4918
    @dixiedeed4918 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Ridiculously name all your shoes crazy

    • @pgee4342
      @pgee4342 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      You do realize he was seeing if OJ would admit to owning Bruno Magli shoes, correct?

    • @loganbothwell543
      @loganbothwell543 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      But can’t remember a bad scar producing cut on his finger! What a coincidence......the same day as the murders.

    • @schakiarligonde1736
      @schakiarligonde1736 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      That the only cut he had on him from breaking glass if he did it he would have more cuts on him and more blood from fighting Goldman he didn’t do it

  • @SugoiEnglish1
    @SugoiEnglish1 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    "Ugly ass shoes." LMAO he was wearing the Bruno Magli shoes, same sole and worn by a pigeon-toed person (OJ was pigeon-toed).

    • @SugoiEnglish1
      @SugoiEnglish1 ปีที่แล้ว

      They were the bloody shoe prints! Killer!

  • @billevans8766
    @billevans8766 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I dont agree nicole was that attractive, once she got older...when he first got with her wasn't to bad..

    • @blueberrycobbler
      @blueberrycobbler 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

      No one cares what your opinion is, Bill. 😂 Speaking of looks..your thumbnail photo.