@rarecarstorys The Many Corvair Clubs around the country are going to have a Hey Day with this You Tube AI Video? I know I was in one of them. They still sell Nader stickers. In stead of Corvairs you should do a Video on Yugos? Got to give you credit for talking about something you have no knowledge of? Hey, try your hand at being a politician! GOOD LUCK REAR CAR STORIES!!!
@@clarencemcgregor8568 It certainly did. Even if the facts were correct, just hearing this exhausted outworn AI narrator voice turns off all my interest.
This narration is loaded with inaccuracies....they should actually research and proofread these videos BEFORE posting them up. NO V6 in Corvairs, flat-6 (Boxer) engines only. The Corsa was a 2-year-only option, `65 and `66, and had 2 engine options, the turbo, or the more-common 140 HP, with 4 carbs. Monzas got no turbo, the 140 was their TOTL. Second-generation (`65 and later) Corvairs got new, improved suspension similar to Corvettes, which eliminated the handling problems inherent in first-gen models. BTW, the VW bug, and military Jeeps also used the same swing-arm rear suspension as the 1st-gen `Vairs, which caused many rollovers and fatalities, yet Nader never said a word about those vehicles. I had three 2nd-gen Corvairs, a `65 Monza (140/ 4-speed) and 2 `66 Corsas, also 140 HP. One of those I did a Crown conversion on, built it into a mid-engine V8, with a 400+ HP small block where the rear seat used to be. Kept it mostly stock-looking for the stealth effect. Many Chevelles, Goats, Mustangs, Road Runners, etc. got humbled by "a lowly Corvair"....
The exposed end of the transaxel turned me off. Dumb ass that I was,I didn't know that a Buick aluminum (215?) V8 is/ was lighter and more powerful than a flattened 6. As always,by the time I had figured that out,Clark's had run out of complete kits.😢
As a fellow former Corv-8 builder and owner, I approve of your comment! I built mine in 1971-72, collected a bunch of trophies from autocrossing, and, to my eternal dismay, sold it in 1989. Dumbest thing I ever did! (The selling, not the building of it). If I may ask, where did/do you live, and do you still have the Corv-8?
@61rampy65 Syracuse NY, I've never owned a Crown Corv8 but, I've owned five 65-69's. I still have a 65 Corsa 140 convertible and at least 8 maybe 10 motors & transaxels along with assorted parts to numerous to mention. A little long winded but, I've had a obsession to build a Genie Corvair since I was 15-16?. As luck would have it, I met a person who not only has restored some but, was a personal friend of the designer, until he passed last year. His son,who owns the engineering firm IS still alive and it thoroughly on board and supportive of my ambition to build one!
The styling of the 65-69 Corvair's stands the test of time. Knock looks in 65 and still a beauty in 25. Best of all it was designed by men who loved cars and not some AI droppings on the design room floor. Viva Corvairs!
Absolutely! The design of the Corvair really is timeless, showcasing the passion and creativity of its creators. It’s a classic that continues to turn heads!
Best 2 wheel for driving through 12 inches of snow. Yes it is better than FWD. Almost as good as a Jeep. Well I did cheat. 14 inch instead of 13 inch wheels and snow tires on the rear. Also the fastest car I ever sat in was a '66 Corvair. It also was a cheat. How does 189 MPH average on that race track in Brooklyn, MI sound? Not a fast 1/4 miler. The transaxle did not like getting launched. The spyder gears would explode. NO you would not run like that with automatic. Might be a bit of a problem cooling it. I was going to do that conversion. But got laid off. A 67-69 Z-28 engine behind the drivers seat. May be why GM never made one that way. But Crown made a conversion kit for 65-69. But it did get 30+ MPG. If you put a raw egg between your foot and the long thin pedal.
David Wilson here. I was pit crew for my friend Ray's ice-racing (in Maine) Corvair. One weekend, the club putting on the race that weekend had a half -hour race on Saturday ("support race") for pit crews to try racing. Ray says, bring your helmet, your going to run my car in the support race. I'm sitting in the Corvair at the starting line and Ray is giving advice in the window. I said, what is your advice in a nutshell? Ray says, "Don't screw up" . I didn't, I won first time out. I still have the trophy. Ray said about Corvairs, "Unsafe at any speed. You might as well go fast".
@angiethundercloud1663 Missing your Corvair? Just remember, it's probably out there somewhere trying to avoid getting into a relationship with a rusty old pickup truck!
@ I just rewatched your video, the first thing I noticed is that you change V6 to Flat 6. Your first statement is that the Corsa “scared” the Yenko. The Yenko is a Corsa that has been modified for racing. I don’t think that a stock Corsa is any threat to a Yenko Stinger. The Turbocharged engine was introduced in March of 1962, it was rated at 150 hp. Cars with the turbo option were called Spyders not Corsas. The Corsa name was not used until the 2nd generation of cars were introduced for model year 1965. One of my complaints is that you would be talking about the Turbo engine but your video is showing the 140 horsepower 4 carburetor engine. By the way 140 horsepower engine is the base engine for the Corsa, you never mentioned it. The 180 hp turbocharged engine was an extra cost option. I have three pages of notes that I made as I rewatched your video. I don’t want to continue listing the errors I found, unless you want me to.
I watched this expecting it to be a hack job on the Corvair. Well, it actually was pretty kind to the Corvair, but filled with inaccuracies, and the AI voice just ruins it. Not a horrible video, but not for someone looking for accurate information.
I appreciate your feedback! I always strive to improve my content, and I’ll definitely take your thoughts into consideration for future videos. if you could point out the inaccuracies, that would be super helpful we get people telling us that it is wrong, but it is challinging when we dont get any infomation about what parts , mistakes are how we learn and grow!
My Dad bought a used 66 Corvair 2 dr white with a 110 motor around 1972-73 , what a fun and great automobile to drive . Down the road from us was a sharp curve and my brothers and I would see how fast we could take in that car and it screamed around it . I think we all enjoyed driving it sadly when we moved my Dad had bought a new 76 Monte Carlo and he sold the Corvair for $600. - i think we all regretted him selling it . nader was a A-hole i read he had never even drove a car and no doubt the first couple years they had some flaws - name me a new car that didn't .
Ah, the Corvair-a car that was basically the original rollercoaster! Your dad sold it for $600? i bet that was heartbreaking, your 100% right on that guy , the more resurch we do on him the dirtyer he gets !
That dual exhaust model first shown is NOT turbo charged, but most likely the 4 carb motor. The 62 trubo model was the Spyder NOT Corsa. This post is all about the turbo car, so stop showing pics of carb cars. The Yenko was built on the 2nd gen Corvair NOT the 1st. This post has too many errors and inaccuracies. Do proper research.
Thank you for pointing that out! I appreciate your knowledge and insights on the subject. I'll make sure to double-check our facts next time! it is very easy to let one of the clips slip in ... we only have 24-48h window with our editors
You forgot to mention that GM had the flat six by three years before Porsche and in 1962 the turbo corvair was spanking Porsche in the scca racing and not to mention the other things people were doing with them such as taking the drive train and making dune buggies and sand rails for drag racing in sand.
Who knew the Corvair was the original underdog superhero? Spanking Porsches and building dune buggies-sounds like a party on wheels! this is why we created this channel, its a grerat way to learn & connect with such an amazing informed and educated audiance
@rarecarstorys The Yenko Corvairs were D/ Production class, while the 356 Porsches (only four cylinders) were in two classes, G/Production (1300 cc) and E/Production (1600 cc), meaning they weren't racing each other. By the way, the Yenko started out as the four carb 140hp version, not the 150 or 180hp turbo versions, and unless a Turbo had the same modifications as the Yenko (Suspension and weight reduction) it would not be faster than a Yenko. The Twin Cam ( Carrera) version of the Porsche 356, (still 1600cc, not sure of the SCCA Classification, if there was one), would have smoked any Corvair, at the time. Never saw a turbo Corvair running in SCCA, don't think they allowed Turbos or mechanical Superchargers), if they could, I'm pretty sure Yenko would have used them. I once owned the (1 of 2) Yenko Turbo Stinger Vegas, that Don Yenko built in 1971, hoping to make them fast, one blew up in the 50,000 mile durability test required for emission testing, and they dropped the idea with 4,000 miles on the second one, which I found on a well known Chevrolet dealer's, Used car lot, in the Detroit area. It was as quick as a '71 Z28 LT-1, until it hit 70 mph, when it suffered fuel starvation. As it was bought with no warranty, and I couldn't find anyone that would work on it, I Traded back to the dealer, for a Vega sedan delivery, losing a lot of money in the deal ( also lost my job at the Pontiac dealer I worked at, as the owner didn't like that I bought a car from another dealer, and pulled me out of GM Body school, the first day I drove it to work, at which time I left that job and went to work in a parts store. Sure wish I could have seen the future, That Yenko, and the '63 Porsche 356 Super 90 Cabriolet, with 2 twin choke solex carbs, and roller crankshaft that I got a couple years later, would be worth about 400k, now.
@@ramblerdave1339 Yeah I know, I don't remember the magazine it was from June of 1965 for a fun article they ran a dual cam 356 the 62 monza and and a 62 turbo at riverside just for a bench racing session. The discussion of the idea to take the covair motor and put it in a porsche, they also had weight/ hp ratios, and skid pad numbers and such I wish I could remember the magazine name. I believe that article started the rumor that GM gave Porsche the idea of the six ,but that's not true. The fact is Porsche had been working on a flat six for their replacement of the 356 since 1957 based on articles I found on the net.but it was a thought provoking article IMO
@@racer6583Sounds like something Car & Driver, or it's predecessor Sports Car Graphic, would have done. I believe the Porsche 906 race car debuted the flat six around '63-64 or maybe it was in the 904, which I was thinking had the Carrera engine.
@@racer6583 Chevrolet already had the flat 6 developed, & working in there prototype in early 1957, & was in full production in the summer of 1959 for release in Oct. of 1959 FACT! Porsche didn't start development until 1962 when Chevrolet introduced the 1st mass produced turbo charge engine; Which Porsche would not offer for another 12 years FACT! Also you need to check why the father of Porsche bought 10 Corvairs for testing to see if those engines would fit into a Porsche, & when Porsche 1st introduced there 1st air cooled flat 6 it was the same displacement as the Corvair 2.7 Fact. One other thing GM already did all the R&D as well as the capitol for the development on the flat 6, & they were also working on in 64 on air cooled flat 8's but had cooling problems on the inside cylinders. When Ford introduced the Mustang in 64 that would be the demise of the Corvair, & in early 65 GM decided no more r&d on the Corvair, But it was a FACT that GM did share information with Porsche on there development for there a/c flat 6. If you get the chance look at a episode of Wheeler Dealers where Ed China explains how Porsche did take advantage of GM's r&d; Ed China is a big fan of VW's by the way.
TH-cam needs to add a "BS" button to the like/dislike options. Too much misinformation for those new to cars is bad. It's not that easy for those of us who are reasonably well informed. Even we find out over time that some of what we believed just wasn't true. KEEP IT ACCURATE.
I appreciate your feedback! It’s important to critically analyze content, and I always strive to improve and provide accurate information. what inaccuracies are you refering? please ues timestamps so we can make the adjustments, have you also read the info on this film?
Agree, the first girl I dated more than twice, had two Corvairs that her dad restored, first a '63 coupe, while he was restoring her second, a '65 140hp Convertible, both automatics. I got to drive the "65 a few times. A blast to slide around curves on dirt roads, and very competent on pavement. Her father was the Senior Project Engineer, at the GM Proving Grounds, for both the Corvair, and the Toronado, and had eight Corvairs in their barn, one, a '62 Monza Convertible, had a dashboard fire at the Proving Ground, with 400 miles on it, and he bought it for $400 ($1/mile?) He was planning to restore it when he retired, but we had broken up before his retirement party, but we still went to it together.
I totally understand where you're coming from! Accuracy is super important in creating quality content, and I appreciate your feedback. what facts are you refering to , i always think of this quote when learning about new and exciting subjects “Be curious, not judgmental.”
@rarecarstorys My parents had his and hers red '63 Monzas when I was a kid, so it was especially nostalgic to drive that Corsa even though it was a different model.
I had a 1964 convertible Monza Spyder 150 turbo boxer six engine with a 4 speed standard. I loved the traction in the snow, due to the engine on the drive wheels. But I had to watch the directional stability on the light front end. The cabin heat was fast to heat up, due to the air cooled engine and heat that came from the entire block, not just the exhaust manifold, like the VW Bug had.
@MegaGeorge1948 It's awesome to hear about your experience with the Monza Spyder! It really is a unique vehicle with some great features, especially for winter driving. should we do a story on the spyders ?
This is how they learn the stuff they want to know; by baiting us with A bunch of cool cars, and any old text, and we supply the knowledge, and/or expertise, to them cheap/free. Best way to enjoy? Turn off volume, watch the pictures. There will still be arguments in the comments, so little will be gained there! 😂🤔
Haha, I love your strategy! Who needs sound when you’ve got a parade of cool cars to feast your eyes on? Just sit back, relax, and let the comment wars commence!
"It was the perfect car for someone who wanted to experience..." 180 hp complete with turbo lag. You could get a Ford Falcon in '65 with a 289 ci V8 that put out 200 naturally aspirated hp and was faster 0-60. The Corvair Corsa also had overheating issues. That being said, it was a good looking car inside and out and handled really well. My HS girlfriend had a '65 Monza.
I really appreciate your comment! It's always great to hear from fellow car enthusiasts who have a passion for classic models like the Monza. The car that made high school sweethearts feel like they were in a romance movie, complete with turbo lag drama!
@@blackwaterdogs4256 Hell no pun intended; Any new vehicle breaks a serpentine belt will have the same problems, But most likely worse. Luv my Corvairs.
The Corvair had the same problem that the Fiero had. GM was worried that a faster version of either might overshadow the 2x expensive Corvette. Too bad Yenko wasn't around to make a Fiero.
I appreciate your feedback! Titles can be tricky sometimes, but I'm glad you took the time to share your thoughts. can we ask what was stupid about in , in your humble opinion?
@rarecarstorys 'A dangerous V-6 engine? It is not dangerous. It is behind the diver so maybe a bit safer. And the engine is NOT a V-6. I am a Nader hater and a lover of the corvair BOXER engine. I have been around corvairs since 1963.
I had a '64 Monza 4spd, what a fun car, could go in the snow like you wouldn't believe, got ticketed doing 105 on the expressway, the cop said he didn't believe it would go that fast, I said I still had pedal and I did!! Those were the days!!!
Some of us grew up with this car. Google Books can provide old Popular Science magazines and similar which ACCURATELY describe the car and its performance. And here's a hint: Nader knew NOTHING about cars. Please don't push clickbait.
Ah, the good ol' days when cars were simpler and we weren't glued to our screens! Nader might have known less about cars, but he sure knew how to stir up a conversation!
There is nothing wrong with this 1965 Chevrolet Corvair Corsa! I own one along with a Corvair Monza Spyder (Turbo).!! These cars are so great!! In The Spyder Turbo I could flat out smoke the Porsche 911. It’s absolute truth!Turn and Burn! ☄️💥🔥😱🤣🤣🤣👍🏽
It's awesome to hear you're a fellow Corvair enthusiast! The Corsa and Monza Spyder are such classics, and it's amazing how they can hold their own against modern sports cars.
My brother-in-law, an engineer for Collins Radio, and a real car guy, wrecked his '61 Corvette. The insurance let him keep it for scrap value. He took the 365 hp 'vette engine and placed it mid- engine in a '65 Corvair. It was brutally fast and could corner like a cat.
Wow, that sounds like an incredible project! It’s amazing what creativity and engineering skills can do with a classic car. i want to see, hear and feel what that was like , your Brother in Law sounds like just the sort of person we hang out with at weekends
I owned a 1965 gen 2 Corsa non turbo. I used to take it up to the mountains, and turn off the engine and see how many miles I could coast. The engine completely blew before too long. After receiving a new engine I sold it. These engines were just junk, but the car handled well and had good acceleration. BTW according to 0to60times the 1960 Corvair sedan accelerated 0-60 in 21.2 seconds and the 1961 Corvair Greenbrier van accelerated 0-60 in an amazing 32.2 seconds. Pretty dang bad, but the sedan was still faster than the VW Beetles from around that era, albeit not by much. The Greenbrier van was second on the list of slowest o-60 times. Number 1 was the 1954 VW Beetle at 35 seconds, but it still did the quarter mile faster than the Greenbrier. They don't have any times for the VW Bus, but another site clocked a 1962 at almost 49 seconds. The 0-150 mph speed was listed as "haha".
It's interesting to hear your experience with the 1965 Corsa! Those engines definitely had their quirks, but it sounds like you made some great memories with it. Thanks for sharing those stats too; it’s always fun to compare the performance of classic cars!
Absolutely! I always strive to provide accurate and well-researched content. If you have any specific questions or topics you'd like to discuss, feel free to ask!
My first Corvair was 62 Monza 4 spd Had too much fun and drove it fro Long Beach CA. to Daytona FLA in 52 hours , my next was a 64 Monza 4 spd I paid 20 dollars , again had too much fun .Never had any problem rippin through the hills . I did see Corvair with a 409 in the front . The 65 on was a good lookin car but needed at least 350 HP turbo would have been nice . They were called the poor mans porsche .Been a mopar person most of my life but another Corvair I would like .
Had a 67 with the quick steering arms and damper, shifter spacer for quick shifting,3:83?3:89? Posi ,14" steelies with low profile gatorbacks and.... Open headers. OMG 0 to 60 was instantaneous,in first gear!!!! Oh yeah,it was only a 110HP dual carb Monza !!!!
@JamesBraun-n1p Wow, it sounds like you have some incredible memories with your Corvairs! Driving from Long Beach to Daytona in just 52 hours is quite the adventure. Thank you for sharing your experiences!
Same deadly design as the Porsche 911 series. Hang a heavy engine behind the rear wheels, causing trailing throttle oversteer, resulting in the tail coming around and sliding into a tree (telephone pole, store front, off a cliff, etc.). Even Porsche realized it was a poor design, and went to a mid engine for all their prototype racing cars from 1960 onward. No other manufacturer used a rear engine design for it's sports cars.
You bring up some interesting points about the design choices in sports cars. The evolution of engineering really highlights how manufacturers learn from the past!
True, but if it did, I'd be the first to start selling VW magic wands for Corvairs! thank you for pointing out this error, we will endevour to not make that right next time
I think both iterations are excellent in their own way. The first series pretty much represented the styling trends of the early 60s, really nicely, while the later ones modernized the looks and brought the Corvair up to date. I prefer the later myself but all the Corvairs were really well styled.
That was only the Fitch Corvairs, built by John Fitch, a great American road racer in the early fifties, driving for Cunningham. He raced for Mercedes at LeMans, and was the co-driver listed for the 300SLR, that Pierre Levegh crashed into the grandstand, killing 80 spectators and himself, before he was supposed to turn it over to Fitch, in 1955. Reading Fitch's biography, in the junior high library, was what turned me into a road racing fan. By the way, I also agree, that semi-fastback attached around the rear window, never appealed to me, more fond of the Yenko version with the small panel over the quarter glass, but like the original best. Yenko may have found that a way to reinforce the C pillar, for stiffness.
Yeah, it`s a shame that the Corvair died an untimely death in `69....it was ALMOST perfect, a little more fine-tuning (and water-cooling) would have resolved most issues. It would have been the perfect car to fight off the tidal wave of Japanese imports which were about to invade America. Instead, GM gave us shitboxes like the Vega, Chevette, etc. Too bad....
They perfected this car by 65 but too bad they started out with the dangerous straight axle that needs tire pressure correct. This car should have taken off .... what a shame we missed it..they especially great in the snow and mud. It should have been a VW killer. Like the Ferio it started out BAD. Thanks for posting!
It had the same swing axles that the the VW used from the beginning until 1967. And most rear engine cars from many manufacturers. A straight axle is what is not an independent rear suspension. For about $50 per car, a camber compensator would have fixed the issue, but Chevy bean counters, wouldn't allow it until 1964, and the '65 new design, didn't require one. One was available on the aftermarket, from the beginning, for a little more than it would have cost the factory, as anyone who had ever raced a swing axle car, knows ( myself, included). You could make them from a chain or cable, and a few bolts, as some racers did.
I can't say I agree with all your comments on the Corvair; I had 60 Corvair model 700 4 door with a 2 speed Power-Glide. I must say it was no racer, But performed as it was design to, & never had issues with going around curves slightly above the recommended speed or her even cruising at 70 mph down the interstate with it's 80 hp engine which didn't even break a sweat at that speed it was still stock except the radial tires, But you still had to inflate the tire pressures at different psi. If you think about it all vehicles have recommended tire pressures that are not the same as the tire manufactures recommended pressure; If you can recall back in the early 2000's Ford had a problem with there very long time partner Firestone " Wilderness " tire overheating, & blowing out as well as several rollovers do to Fords recommended lower tire pressure, & not wanting to spend the $$$$$ on simple suspension upgrades for a smoother ride on the Explorer. As a result they blamed Firestone for the tire failures, & threw there longtime partner under the bus just to avoid paying lawsuits. Firestone was redeemed, But the damage was done.I still own 3 Corvairs 64,65,& a 67.
I ALWAYS wondered why Chevy ended the Corvallis because of rear engine drive. Pressured by a " Nader ".....NEVER WENT AFTER VOLKSWAGON. Corsair was UNSAFE, While the BEETLE was okay. I watched a movie, of vehicle accidents, popular back in the " 60s ". One accident involved a VW Beetle. Driven by a professor, driving UP a mountain logging road. A fully loaded LOGGING TRUCK, going a little to fast , going down the mountain, went wide on a curve, RAN OVER THE BEETLE. Finally stopped. The VW....was " FLATTENED " as if a giant foot came down and stomped it flat. The professor was behind the wheel.
There is another car vid on youtube, which shows a well-known photo of Bruce Springsteen with a 1960 Corvette. The narrator assures us that this is a photo of Bob Dylan.
They never spanked a 911, the first without a swing axle, and the first flat 6 Porsche, just the 4 cylinder 356, which was faster than the 4 cylinder version of the 911, the 912. The 911 still was about 2/3 the size of the Corvair's displacement, and ran in a higher class, C/Prod.
@@ramblerdave1339 Yeah it was so good when they introduced it with a flat 6 it was the same displacement a 2.7 Oh, & they didn't offer a turbo till 12 years later than the 1st turbo charged Corvair.
@@ACF6180T Nope. The first 911 was 2.0, ran against Datsun 510, BMW 2002, and Alfa Romeo GTV, in the Under 2.5 liter class in the Trans Am series. Usually half the field was 911s. The first 914/6, was also 2.0 L.
@ramblerdave1339 @ACF6180T Thank you for sharing your insights! It's always fascinating to discuss the history of such iconic vehicles and their developments over time.
True! Trying to fit a V6 in there would be like trying to squeeze an elephant into a phone booth! we could not fit 6 cilinder in the thumbnail, sometimes we even have trouble spelling , we apreciate your thoughts and comments ,
Sure it would, but would require a radiator up front, and tubes to go all the way to the rear panel, to connect to the engine. It shouldn't be much longer than the flat 6, and wouldn't have the air cooling fan on top. Might need a clearance bubble on the decklid. I believe I've heard of someone putting a 3.8 Buick into one.
@@ramblerdave1339 They've done conversions with a Chevrolet V6 4.3 & a Oldsmobile Toronado 8 that fit into the engine compartment with the fans up front as well as the radiator.
@rarecarstorys Its been done with a Chevrolet 4.3 V6 in the Corvairs original engine compartment; They've even done Oldsmobile Tornados V8's out back in the original engine compartment.
i am super dyslexic , and i type with sausage fingers , typo are great and fun ... you should see the misspelling and missunderstangs i have with the GF, utter hilarious
Thank you for your feedback! I appreciate your insights and will definitely take them into account for future videos. our resurcher & editor will be sacked and replaced
My brother's had more than one corvair,, safety concerns,, if you can't drive, you should not sit behind the wheel,,, I forget that guys name,, that brought us eye sore 5mph bumpers,, and catalytic convertors,,, cars that cost $20k that we could buy for under $2000,,,,, or buy a used car or VW Bug for $150,, or someone would give you VW Bug for free,, that ran,, lights worked brakes were good,, even have tires you could just drive on,,
It's interesting to hear about your brother's experiences with Corvairs! They definitely had their quirks, and we know the truth ... posted in the details of this film , that guy was curupt, and took money from Porsche & VW, i wonder what eles went on ?
I appreciate your feedback! It’s always helpful to know how viewers are feeling about the content. what BS are you refering to ? use time stamps so we can make the corrections
Thank you for sharing your thoughts! Your input really helps me improve my content. we did have a Voice over guy, but the cost was out of my own pocket , and i hads to cut back when my dad went to hospital to pay the bills , i am sure you can understand those challanges
Absolutely! It's fascinating to see how much has evolved in just two years. The corrections and turbo model really illustrate how quickly things can change!
Nope, wrong ! `65 and `66 were the prime development years, GM saw the writing on the wall after Nader`s hatchet job, so they did not put any R&D money into the Corvair for it`s final 3 years on the market. That was a shame....
@@blackwaterdogs4256 The muscle cars is what really hurt the Corvair the Mustang, & GM like you commented no more r&d, &didn't want it competing with the Camaro. I still own 3 Corvairs 64,65, & a 67.
@@ACF6180T Yeah, good points, all valid. Where GM REALLY missed the boat is that the (more refined) Corvair could have co-existed quite well with the Camaro, as well as other full-sized Chevys. The Corvair reached a much wider (family) market, with 4-door models, a wagon, the Greenbriar Van, and the Rampside pickup. GM`s short-sightedness led to a serious ass whipping by a flood of Japanese invaders shortly after the Corvair`s demise.
Now we know the truth, the Porsche and Volkswagen, which are subsidiaries of each other paid a large amount of money to Ralph Nader to write a hit piece on the Corvair, because it was in direct competition with the sales of beetle and other Volkswagen and Porsche products the truth is both of the Volkswagen beetle and the Corvair because of their rear engine the front suspension is light and is not as responsive so people believed the lie they were told about the Corvair. This is a well documented. But under reported
It's fascinating how the automotive industry has so many hidden stories! The competition between these brands definitely shaped public perception in ways we’re still uncovering today. we added your comment in the details , and with your blessing will add it to our next corvair film , Mike you are awsome!
I'm a Corvair enthusiast, & still own 3 of them going back to 1987, & have quite a library on Corvairs, & have never heard of this; Could you please name some sources as I would like too research this info. Thank you.
@@ACF6180T yes, I will try to find you some of the articles I have read, but there is something on TH-cam. I saw a couple of years ago if I can find the info I will try to send it to you.
You're absolutely right! The Corsair definitely had a unique engine setup, and it's always great to clarify those details for fellow enthusiasts. the thumbnail . is back with the designer, having a tweek , i have faith you will aprove and write a positive comment back
what is the differance between criticism and constructive criticism ? one has information within it , that helps us make the necessary adjustmens , we enjoy our errors being pointed out and fact checked , this is how we learn and grow , please share your thoughts on , WRONG, WRONG and WRONG, with time stamps ,
OK, let`s cut to the chase here. The IMPORTANT thing is that this video even exists ! While not perfect in every detail, the creator made an effort to give us useful content. Let`s show some LOVE & APPRECIATION for a GREAT automobile !
Why did you Call it a V-6 in the title Block. It was a nightmare to drive fast on anything but a straight road. You are full of Hot Air as the cars you seem to be driving are heavily modified Corvairs'. They just don't push the stock ones hard. If you lived in the Southwest desert areas after two hot summers you better change the belt and the push rod tube o rings. If you lived in cold northern States You better change the belt for the second winter and also the rear Main seals and o rings gave problems especially if you hadn't gone to a winter grade oil. OMG then there was all the problems with the Heater and defroster. The Corvair was dangerous in the ice and snow and many drivers not familiar with rear drive handling characteristics found themselves in the ditch or in the ditch on the opposite side of the road. I worked at Chev Olds Caddy Dealership from latte 59 till Nov. 67 and saw it all. Some buyers ended up critically injured and a couple of owners ended in the Morgue's. Ralph Nader was right GM knew they put a stinker on the road But ignored the customers complaints opting to the cheaper path paying off the lawsuits out of court. It's SAD as they finally had made the Corvair a great machine by 1969 but it was a little too Late. YEPP it was a good looking death trap in the hands of the general public.
Unsafe flat 6, sounded like a problem my landlord would deal with. we had 2 other thumbnails , killer corsa, scared yenko, but the youtube audiance chose UNSAFE V6, funny how this all works Thank you for sharing your insights, Ralph! It’s clear you have a wealth of experience with the Corvair, and your perspective on its handling and maintenance challenges is invaluable.
as funny as it sounds, we ask our thumbnail designer to put flat 6 , and it look so weird we simplified it visually , thank you for noticing and sharing your thoughts
it is in the discription, we will be expanding on this with first gen covairs, and hoping to get more accurate information , from the corvair fourm , to double check the accuracy , this is how we learn and grow , from our mistakes ( unexpected adventures into the unknown ) thank you for sharing your thoughts
This has so much completely incorrect information, it should be flagged. This is AI at its very worst. Words matter and this is garbage. If there is a real person somewhere here, do some research instead of making things up, conflating models, engines and pictures of mostly modified and inaccurate representations of Corvairs in general.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts! I appreciate your feedback and will definitely take it into consideration for future videos. Accuracy is important, and I'm always looking to improve. we are learning and we are spending our own savings while my dad is in hospital , i built this channel to share with him and our love of cars together .... and hopefull pay the hospital bills ... if you can pray , and make a donation to a cancer charity ....love will always overcome the negativity and darkness
I appreciate your perspective! It's always important to question the information we come across. If you ever change your mind, I'd love to hear your thoughts after watching! this is how we learn and grow
bs by 65 the corvair problems were solved no other problems than almost all cars had . the srear uspension was solved by 62 and if teflon seales had been invented the minor oil leaks would also be solved i owned a 64 and dont regreat buying it
It's interesting how one person's advocacy can lead to such significant changes in the automotive industry. Nader's became famous of the damage he caused chrysler
It's not a V6. It's a flat six or boxer engine.
you are absolutely right! If it were a V6, it would be having an identity crisis! Flat sixes are just too cool for that. 😄
@rarecarstorys The Many Corvair Clubs around the country are going to have a Hey Day with this You Tube AI Video? I know I was in one of them. They still sell Nader stickers. In stead of Corvairs you should do a Video on Yugos? Got to give you credit for talking about something you have no knowledge of? Hey, try your hand at being
a politician! GOOD LUCK REAR CAR STORIES!!!
Lost all credibility from the start.
@@clarencemcgregor8568 It certainly did. Even if the facts were correct, just hearing this exhausted outworn AI narrator voice turns off all my interest.
Whatdya expect from a guy that sounds like chuck schumer.
This narration is loaded with inaccuracies....they should actually research and proofread these videos BEFORE posting them up. NO V6 in Corvairs, flat-6 (Boxer) engines only. The Corsa was a 2-year-only option, `65 and `66, and had 2 engine options, the turbo, or the more-common 140 HP, with 4 carbs. Monzas got no turbo, the 140 was their TOTL.
Second-generation (`65 and later) Corvairs got new, improved suspension similar to Corvettes, which eliminated the handling problems inherent in first-gen models.
BTW, the VW bug, and military Jeeps also used the same swing-arm rear suspension as the 1st-gen `Vairs, which caused many rollovers and fatalities, yet Nader never said a word about those vehicles.
I had three 2nd-gen Corvairs, a `65 Monza (140/ 4-speed) and 2 `66 Corsas, also 140 HP. One of those I did a Crown conversion on, built it into a mid-engine V8, with a 400+ HP small block where the rear seat used to be. Kept it mostly stock-looking for the stealth effect. Many Chevelles, Goats, Mustangs, Road Runners, etc. got humbled by "a lowly Corvair"....
I concur, But you did have one type o the 140 was the standard engine in the Corsa not a option.
@@ACF6180T Within my context, "option" meaning "more than one choice", and not necessarily "an upgrade". Thanks for paying attention !
The exposed end of the transaxel turned me off. Dumb ass that I was,I didn't know that a Buick aluminum (215?) V8 is/ was lighter and more powerful than a flattened 6. As always,by the time I had figured that out,Clark's had run out of complete kits.😢
As a fellow former Corv-8 builder and owner, I approve of your comment! I built mine in 1971-72, collected a bunch of trophies from autocrossing, and, to my eternal dismay, sold it in 1989. Dumbest thing I ever did! (The selling, not the building of it). If I may ask, where did/do you live, and do you still have the Corv-8?
@61rampy65 Syracuse NY, I've never owned a Crown Corv8 but, I've owned five 65-69's. I still have a 65 Corsa 140 convertible and at least 8 maybe 10 motors & transaxels along with assorted parts to numerous to mention.
A little long winded but, I've had a obsession to build a Genie Corvair since I was 15-16?. As luck would have it, I met a person who not only has restored some but, was a personal friend of the designer, until he passed last year. His son,who owns the engineering firm IS still alive and it thoroughly on board and supportive of my ambition to build one!
The styling of the 65-69 Corvair's stands the test of time. Knock looks in 65 and still a beauty in 25. Best of all it was designed by men who loved cars and not some AI droppings on the design room floor. Viva Corvairs!
Absolutely! The design of the Corvair really is timeless, showcasing the passion and creativity of its creators. It’s a classic that continues to turn heads!
Best 2 wheel for driving through 12 inches of snow. Yes it is better than FWD.
Almost as good as a Jeep.
Well I did cheat. 14 inch instead of 13 inch wheels and snow tires on the rear.
Also the fastest car I ever sat in was a '66 Corvair. It also was a cheat.
How does 189 MPH average on that race track in Brooklyn, MI sound?
Not a fast 1/4 miler. The transaxle did not like getting launched. The spyder gears would explode. NO you would not run like that with automatic. Might be a bit of a problem cooling it.
I was going to do that conversion. But got laid off.
A 67-69 Z-28 engine behind the drivers seat. May be why GM never made one that way.
But Crown made a conversion kit for 65-69.
But it did get 30+ MPG. If you put a raw egg between your foot and the long thin pedal.
David Wilson here.
I was pit crew for my friend Ray's ice-racing (in Maine) Corvair. One weekend, the club putting on the race that weekend had a half -hour race on Saturday ("support race") for pit crews to try racing. Ray says, bring your helmet, your going to run my car in the support race. I'm sitting in the Corvair at the starting line and Ray is giving advice in the window. I said, what is your advice in a nutshell? Ray says, "Don't screw up" . I didn't, I won first time out. I still have the trophy. Ray said about Corvairs, "Unsafe at any speed. You might as well go fast".
wow david, your story is the reason i created this channel , thank you for sharing and being a part of this growing community ,
@rarecarstorys - O6:12 isn't a Jetfire or the body used for Jetfire...
I miss my 1965 corvair 110 hp monza 😫
@angiethundercloud1663 Missing your Corvair? Just remember, it's probably out there somewhere trying to avoid getting into a relationship with a rusty old pickup truck!
You can still get one used, & not abused if you know were to look.
The 1965 to 1969 Vairs are timeless, Wonderfull lasting styling .
stunning from every angle
Absolutely. Even BMW borrowed a lot of styling cues, if you look at their 3.0 Coupe (1973-ish), you will find major similarities.
This has so much misinformation I don’t know where to begin.
I appreciate your feedback! If you have specific points you'd like to discuss, I’d love to hear them so we can clarify any misunderstandings.
@
I just rewatched your video, the first thing I noticed is that you change V6 to Flat 6. Your first statement is that the Corsa “scared” the Yenko. The Yenko is a Corsa that has been modified for racing. I don’t think that a stock Corsa is any threat to a Yenko Stinger.
The Turbocharged engine was introduced in March of 1962, it was rated at 150 hp. Cars with the turbo option were called Spyders not Corsas. The Corsa name was not used until the 2nd generation of cars were introduced for model year 1965.
One of my complaints is that you would be talking about the Turbo engine but your video is showing the 140 horsepower 4 carburetor engine. By the way 140 horsepower engine is the base engine for the Corsa, you never mentioned it. The 180 hp turbocharged engine was an extra cost option.
I have three pages of notes that I made as I rewatched your video. I don’t want to continue listing the errors I found, unless you want me to.
I watched this expecting it to be a hack job on the Corvair. Well, it actually was pretty kind to the Corvair, but filled with inaccuracies, and the AI voice just ruins it. Not a horrible video, but not for someone looking for accurate information.
I appreciate your feedback! I always strive to improve my content, and I’ll definitely take your thoughts into consideration for future videos.
if you could point out the inaccuracies, that would be super helpful
we get people telling us that it is wrong, but it is challinging when we dont get any infomation about what parts , mistakes are how we learn and grow!
My Dad bought a used 66 Corvair 2 dr white with a 110 motor around 1972-73 , what a fun and great automobile to drive . Down the road from us was a sharp curve and my brothers and I would see how fast we could take in that car and it screamed around it . I think we all enjoyed driving it sadly when we moved my Dad had bought a new 76 Monte Carlo and he sold the Corvair for $600. - i think we all regretted him selling it . nader was a A-hole i read he had never even drove a car and no doubt the first couple years they had some flaws - name me a new car that didn't .
Ah, the Corvair-a car that was basically the original rollercoaster! Your dad sold it for $600? i bet that was heartbreaking, your 100% right on that guy , the more resurch we do on him the dirtyer he gets !
That dual exhaust model first shown is NOT turbo charged, but most likely the 4 carb motor. The 62 trubo model was the Spyder NOT Corsa. This post is all about the turbo car, so stop showing pics of carb cars. The Yenko was built on the 2nd gen Corvair NOT the 1st. This post has too many errors and inaccuracies. Do proper research.
Thank you for pointing that out! I appreciate your knowledge and insights on the subject. I'll make sure to double-check our facts next time! it is very easy to let one of the clips slip in ... we only have 24-48h window with our editors
You forgot to mention that GM had the flat six by three years before Porsche and in 1962 the turbo corvair was spanking Porsche in the scca racing and not to mention the other things people were doing with them such as taking the drive train and making dune buggies and sand rails for drag racing in sand.
Who knew the Corvair was the original underdog superhero? Spanking Porsches and building dune buggies-sounds like a party on wheels!
this is why we created this channel, its a grerat way to learn & connect with such an amazing informed and educated audiance
@rarecarstorys The Yenko Corvairs were D/ Production class, while the 356 Porsches (only four cylinders) were in two classes, G/Production (1300 cc) and E/Production (1600 cc), meaning they weren't racing each other. By the way, the Yenko started out as the four carb 140hp version, not the 150 or 180hp turbo versions, and unless a Turbo had the same modifications as the Yenko (Suspension and weight reduction) it would not be faster than a Yenko. The Twin Cam ( Carrera) version of the Porsche 356, (still 1600cc, not sure of the SCCA Classification, if there was one), would have smoked any Corvair, at the time. Never saw a turbo Corvair running in SCCA, don't think they allowed Turbos or mechanical Superchargers), if they could, I'm pretty sure Yenko would have used them. I once owned the (1 of 2) Yenko Turbo Stinger Vegas, that Don Yenko built in 1971, hoping to make them fast, one blew up in the 50,000 mile durability test required for emission testing, and they dropped the idea with 4,000 miles on the second one, which I found on a well known Chevrolet dealer's, Used car lot, in the Detroit area. It was as quick as a '71 Z28 LT-1, until it hit 70 mph, when it suffered fuel starvation. As it was bought with no warranty, and I couldn't find anyone that would work on it, I Traded back to the dealer, for a Vega sedan delivery, losing a lot of money in the deal ( also lost my job at the Pontiac dealer I worked at, as the owner didn't like that I bought a car from another dealer, and pulled me out of GM Body school, the first day I drove it to work, at which time I left that job and went to work in a parts store. Sure wish I could have seen the future, That Yenko, and the '63 Porsche 356 Super 90 Cabriolet, with 2 twin choke solex carbs, and roller crankshaft that I got a couple years later, would be worth about 400k, now.
@@ramblerdave1339 Yeah I know, I don't remember the magazine it was from June of 1965 for a fun article they ran a dual cam 356 the 62 monza and and a 62 turbo at riverside just for a bench racing session.
The discussion of the idea to take the covair motor and put it in a porsche, they also had weight/ hp ratios, and skid pad numbers and such I wish I could remember the magazine name.
I believe that article started the rumor that GM gave Porsche the idea of the six ,but that's not true. The fact is Porsche had been working on a flat six for their replacement of the 356 since 1957 based on articles I found on the net.but it was a thought provoking article IMO
@@racer6583Sounds like something Car & Driver, or it's predecessor Sports Car Graphic, would have done. I believe the Porsche 906 race car debuted the flat six around '63-64 or maybe it was in the 904, which I was thinking had the Carrera engine.
@@racer6583 Chevrolet already had the flat 6 developed, & working in there prototype in early 1957, & was in full production in the summer of 1959 for release in Oct. of 1959 FACT! Porsche didn't start development until 1962 when Chevrolet introduced the 1st mass produced turbo charge engine; Which Porsche would not offer for another 12 years FACT! Also you need to check why the father of Porsche bought 10 Corvairs for testing to see if those engines would fit into a Porsche, & when Porsche 1st introduced there 1st air cooled flat 6 it was the same displacement as the Corvair 2.7 Fact. One other thing GM already did all the R&D as well as the capitol for the development on the flat 6, & they were also working on in 64 on air cooled flat 8's but had cooling problems on the inside cylinders. When Ford introduced the Mustang in 64 that would be the demise of the Corvair, & in early 65 GM decided no more r&d on the Corvair, But it was a FACT that GM did share information with Porsche on there development for there a/c flat 6. If you get the chance look at a episode of Wheeler Dealers where Ed China explains how Porsche did take advantage of GM's r&d; Ed China is a big fan of VW's by the way.
50 years ago going a 100 mph flipped car on roof I thought we would never stop.everyone walked away god must have been riding with us
I'd drive one of these any day. The issues were minor and easily addressed.
Right? With how minor those issues were, I’d say they’re just "character-building" quirks! like my ex wife
Full of inaccuracies and outright lies. But knowing nothing never stopped anyone on yootoob from putting up clickbait gibberish.
TH-cam needs to add a "BS" button to the like/dislike options. Too much misinformation for those new to cars is bad. It's not that easy for those of us who are reasonably well informed. Even we find out over time that some of what we believed just wasn't true. KEEP IT ACCURATE.
If I stopped because I didn't know anything, I never would have gotten laid 👍
I appreciate your feedback! It’s important to critically analyze content, and I always strive to improve and provide accurate information. what inaccuracies are you refering? please ues timestamps so we can make the adjustments, have you also read the info on this film?
Right? Who knew that a little ignorance could lead to some of life's best moments? Sometimes, not knowing is half the fun!
@rarecarstorys Do your own research or just learn to read.
the corvair are such a fun car to drive and still look good today
Thank you for sharing your thoughts! It’s always great to see fellow Corvair fans appreciate this classic beauty.
Agree, the first girl I dated more than twice, had two Corvairs that her dad restored, first a '63 coupe, while he was restoring her second, a '65 140hp Convertible, both automatics. I got to drive the "65 a few times. A blast to slide around curves on dirt roads, and very competent on pavement. Her father was the Senior Project Engineer, at the GM Proving Grounds, for both the Corvair, and the Toronado, and had eight Corvairs in their barn, one, a '62 Monza Convertible, had a dashboard fire at the Proving Ground, with 400 miles on it, and he bought it for $400 ($1/mile?) He was planning to restore it when he retired, but we had broken up before his retirement party, but we still went to it together.
If you can't check your facts I'm not interested in your channel..
I totally understand where you're coming from! Accuracy is super important in creating quality content, and I appreciate your feedback. what facts are you refering to , i always think of this quote when learning about new and exciting subjects “Be curious, not judgmental.”
I had one of these briefly in the early 80's and it was a lot of fun to drive. Handled like a dream!
That's awesome to hear! The nostalgia of driving the corvairs really brings back some amazing memories, we are blessed!
@rarecarstorys My parents had his and hers red '63 Monzas when I was a kid, so it was especially nostalgic to drive that Corsa even though it was a different model.
The Corvair was given a bad rap back in the day! I think it's a cool car!
Absolutely! The Corvair definitely had its unfair share of criticism. It's a unique piece of automotive history that deserves more appreciation!
I had a 1964 convertible Monza Spyder 150 turbo boxer six engine with a 4 speed standard. I loved the traction in the snow, due to the engine on the drive wheels. But I had to watch the directional stability on the light front end. The cabin heat was fast to heat up, due to the air cooled engine and heat that came from the entire block, not just the exhaust manifold, like the VW Bug had.
@MegaGeorge1948
It's awesome to hear about your experience with the Monza Spyder! It really is a unique vehicle with some great features, especially for winter driving. should we do a story on the spyders ?
@rarecarstorys Sure.
The author needs a Corvair 101 class for sure ! So many errors !
This is how they learn the stuff they want to know; by baiting us with A bunch of cool cars, and any old text, and we supply the knowledge, and/or expertise, to them cheap/free. Best way to enjoy? Turn off volume, watch the pictures. There will still be arguments in the comments, so little will be gained there! 😂🤔
Effort-free AI cobbling with editor-free monologue.
A Corvair 101 class sounds like a great idea! Maybe I should consider getting a crash course before the next video!
Haha, I love your strategy! Who needs sound when you’ve got a parade of cool cars to feast your eyes on? Just sit back, relax, and let the comment wars commence!
Effort-free? Sounds like my kind of cobbling! Now if only it could make me a cup of coffee too!
Corvair! Glenn
"It was the perfect car for someone who wanted to experience..." 180 hp complete with turbo lag. You could get a Ford Falcon in '65 with a 289 ci V8 that put out 200 naturally aspirated hp and was faster 0-60. The Corvair Corsa also had overheating issues. That being said, it was a good looking car inside and out and handled really well. My HS girlfriend had a '65 Monza.
I really appreciate your comment! It's always great to hear from fellow car enthusiasts who have a passion for classic models like the Monza.
The car that made high school sweethearts feel like they were in a romance movie, complete with turbo lag drama!
NO "overheating issues" unless you threw (or broke) a fan belt. Savvy owners always carried a spare belt.
@@blackwaterdogs4256 Hell no pun intended; Any new vehicle breaks a serpentine belt will have the same problems, But most likely worse. Luv my Corvairs.
The Corvair had the same problem that the Fiero had. GM was worried that a faster version of either might overshadow the 2x expensive Corvette. Too bad Yenko wasn't around to make a Fiero.
Ah, the classic GM dilemma: “What if our budget cars are just too cool?” If only Yenko had been there to sprinkle some of that magic on the Fiero!
Stupid title. No need to watch a video with a mistake at the start.
I appreciate your feedback! Titles can be tricky sometimes, but I'm glad you took the time to share your thoughts. can we ask what was stupid about in , in your humble opinion?
@rarecarstorys 'A dangerous V-6 engine? It is not dangerous. It is behind the diver so maybe a bit safer. And the engine is NOT a V-6.
I am a Nader hater and a lover of the corvair BOXER engine. I have been around corvairs since 1963.
The 2nd body (Corvair 2.0) had a full IRS and handled like crazy!
Absolutely! The IRS setup really enhances the handling, making it a blast to drive. Glad you noticed!
I had a '64 Monza 4spd, what a fun car, could go in the snow like you wouldn't believe, got ticketed doing 105 on the expressway, the cop said he didn't believe it would go that fast, I said I still had pedal and I did!! Those were the days!!!
wow, that Monza sounds legendary! 105 on the expressway? That's some serious pedal action! Those were definitely the days! Keep the stories coming!
Some of us grew up with this car. Google Books can provide old Popular Science magazines and similar which ACCURATELY describe the car and its performance. And here's a hint: Nader knew NOTHING about cars. Please don't push clickbait.
Ah, the good ol' days when cars were simpler and we weren't glued to our screens! Nader might have known less about cars, but he sure knew how to stir up a conversation!
There is nothing wrong with this 1965 Chevrolet Corvair Corsa! I own one along with a Corvair Monza Spyder (Turbo).!! These cars are so great!! In The Spyder Turbo I could flat out smoke the Porsche 911. It’s absolute truth!Turn and Burn!
☄️💥🔥😱🤣🤣🤣👍🏽
It's awesome to hear you're a fellow Corvair enthusiast! The Corsa and Monza Spyder are such classics, and it's amazing how they can hold their own against modern sports cars.
My brother-in-law, an engineer for Collins Radio, and a real car guy, wrecked his '61 Corvette. The insurance let him keep it for scrap value. He took the 365 hp 'vette engine and placed it mid- engine in a '65 Corvair. It was brutally fast and could corner like a cat.
Wow, that sounds like an incredible project! It’s amazing what creativity and engineering skills can do with a classic car. i want to see, hear and feel what that was like , your Brother in Law sounds like just the sort of person we hang out with at weekends
I owned a 1965 gen 2 Corsa non turbo. I used to take it up to the mountains, and turn off the engine and see how many miles I could coast. The engine completely blew before too long. After receiving a new engine I sold it. These engines were just junk, but the car handled well and had good acceleration. BTW according to 0to60times the 1960 Corvair sedan accelerated 0-60 in 21.2 seconds and the 1961 Corvair Greenbrier van accelerated 0-60 in an amazing 32.2 seconds. Pretty dang bad, but the sedan was still faster than the VW Beetles from around that era, albeit not by much. The Greenbrier van was second on the list of slowest o-60 times. Number 1 was the 1954 VW Beetle at 35 seconds, but it still did the quarter mile faster than the Greenbrier. They don't have any times for the VW Bus, but another site clocked a 1962 at almost 49 seconds. The 0-150 mph speed was listed as "haha".
It's interesting to hear your experience with the 1965 Corsa! Those engines definitely had their quirks, but it sounds like you made some great memories with it. Thanks for sharing those stats too; it’s always fun to compare the performance of classic cars!
Do you know what you’re talking about!😮
Absolutely! I always strive to provide accurate and well-researched content. If you have any specific questions or topics you'd like to discuss, feel free to ask!
My first Corvair was 62 Monza 4 spd Had too much fun and drove it fro Long Beach CA. to Daytona FLA in 52 hours , my next was a 64 Monza 4 spd I paid 20 dollars , again had too much fun .Never had any problem rippin through the hills . I did see Corvair with a 409 in the front . The 65 on was a good lookin car but needed at least 350 HP turbo would have been nice . They were called the poor mans porsche .Been a mopar person most of my life but another Corvair I would like .
Had a 67 with the quick steering arms and damper, shifter spacer for quick shifting,3:83?3:89? Posi ,14" steelies with low profile gatorbacks and.... Open headers.
OMG 0 to 60 was instantaneous,in first gear!!!!
Oh yeah,it was only a 110HP dual carb Monza !!!!
@JamesBraun-n1p
Wow, it sounds like you have some incredible memories with your Corvairs! Driving from Long Beach to Daytona in just 52 hours is quite the adventure. Thank you for sharing your experiences!
Same deadly design as the Porsche 911 series. Hang a heavy engine behind the rear wheels, causing trailing throttle oversteer, resulting in the tail coming around and sliding into a tree (telephone pole, store front, off a cliff, etc.). Even Porsche realized it was a poor design, and went to a mid engine for all their prototype racing cars from 1960 onward. No other manufacturer used a rear engine design for it's sports cars.
You bring up some interesting points about the design choices in sports cars. The evolution of engineering really highlights how manufacturers learn from the past!
That VW cylinder head shown at 4:50 won’t improve your Corvair performance at all!
True, but if it did, I'd be the first to start selling VW magic wands for Corvairs!
thank you for pointing out this error, we will endevour to not make that right next time
@3:44 That custom fastback roof job doesn't look right imo. GM got the styling right in the 1st place.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts! It’s always great to hear different opinions on design choices, especially when it comes to classic cars.
I think both iterations are excellent in their own way. The first series pretty much represented the styling trends of the early 60s, really nicely, while the later ones modernized the looks and brought the Corvair up to date. I prefer the later myself but all the Corvairs were really well styled.
Ever get the feeling no one knows what the hell you're talking about? 😁
That was only the Fitch Corvairs, built by John Fitch, a great American road racer in the early fifties, driving for Cunningham. He raced for Mercedes at LeMans, and was the co-driver listed for the 300SLR, that Pierre Levegh crashed into the grandstand, killing 80 spectators and himself, before he was supposed to turn it over to Fitch, in 1955. Reading Fitch's biography, in the junior high library, was what turned me into a road racing fan. By the way, I also agree, that semi-fastback attached around the rear window, never appealed to me, more fond of the Yenko version with the small panel over the quarter glass, but like the original best. Yenko may have found that a way to reinforce the C pillar, for stiffness.
@@ramblerdave1339 Ok cool. Now part of that sounds familiar. Thanks Dave!
Chevy would do well to bring back the Corvair with modern styling and technology.
I totally agree! The Corvair has such a unique legacy, and with modern tech, it could be a real game changer for Chevy.
Yeah, it`s a shame that the Corvair died an untimely death in `69....it was ALMOST perfect, a little more fine-tuning (and water-cooling) would have resolved most issues. It would have been the perfect car to fight off the tidal wave of Japanese imports which were about to invade America. Instead, GM gave us shitboxes like the Vega, Chevette, etc. Too bad....
They perfected this car by 65 but too bad they started out with the dangerous straight axle that needs tire pressure correct. This car should have taken off .... what a shame we missed it..they especially great in the snow and mud. It should have been a VW killer. Like the Ferio it started out BAD. Thanks for posting!
It had the same swing axles that the the VW used from the beginning until 1967. And most rear engine cars from many manufacturers. A straight axle is what is not an independent rear suspension. For about $50 per car, a camber compensator would have fixed the issue, but Chevy bean counters, wouldn't allow it until 1964, and the '65 new design, didn't require one. One was available on the aftermarket, from the beginning, for a little more than it would have cost the factory, as anyone who had ever raced a swing axle car, knows ( myself, included). You could make them from a chain or cable, and a few bolts, as some racers did.
I can't say I agree with all your comments on the Corvair; I had 60 Corvair model 700 4 door with a 2 speed Power-Glide. I must say it was no racer, But performed as it was design to, & never had issues with going around curves slightly above the recommended speed or her even cruising at 70 mph down the interstate with it's 80 hp engine which didn't even break a sweat at that speed it was still stock except the radial tires, But you still had to inflate the tire pressures at different psi. If you think about it all vehicles have recommended tire pressures that are not the same as the tire manufactures recommended pressure; If you can recall back in the early 2000's Ford had a problem with there very long time partner Firestone " Wilderness " tire overheating, & blowing out as well as several rollovers do to Fords recommended lower tire pressure, & not wanting to spend the $$$$$ on simple suspension upgrades for a smoother ride on the Explorer. As a result they blamed Firestone for the tire failures, & threw there longtime partner under the bus just to avoid paying lawsuits. Firestone was redeemed, But the damage was done.I still own 3 Corvairs 64,65,& a 67.
Click bait.
Thanks for taking the time to comment! Click bait can be a fun way to spark curiosity, and I appreciate your feedback!
I ALWAYS wondered why Chevy ended the Corvallis because of rear engine drive. Pressured by a " Nader ".....NEVER WENT AFTER VOLKSWAGON. Corsair was UNSAFE, While the BEETLE was okay.
I watched a movie, of vehicle accidents, popular back in the " 60s ". One accident involved a VW Beetle. Driven by a professor, driving UP a mountain logging road. A fully loaded LOGGING TRUCK, going a little to fast , going down the mountain, went wide on a curve, RAN OVER THE BEETLE. Finally stopped. The VW....was " FLATTENED " as if a giant foot came down and stomped it flat. The professor was behind the wheel.
There is another car vid on youtube, which shows a well-known photo of Bruce Springsteen with a 1960 Corvette. The narrator assures us that this is a photo of Bob Dylan.
hahaha i just pissed coffee out of my nose reading this, thank you for shari ng your thoughts, you have literaly made my day!
Biggest mistake GM made was not noting the similarities of the Corvair to Porsches. They were spanking them in the track.
They never spanked a 911, the first without a swing axle, and the first flat 6 Porsche, just the 4 cylinder 356, which was faster than the 4 cylinder version of the 911, the 912. The 911 still was about 2/3 the size of the Corvair's displacement, and ran in a higher class, C/Prod.
@@ramblerdave1339 Yeah it was so good when they introduced it with a flat 6 it was the same displacement a 2.7 Oh, & they didn't offer a turbo till 12 years later than the 1st turbo charged Corvair.
@@ACF6180T Nope. The first 911 was 2.0, ran against Datsun 510, BMW 2002, and Alfa Romeo GTV, in the Under 2.5 liter class in the Trans Am series. Usually half the field was 911s. The first 914/6, was also 2.0 L.
@ramblerdave1339 @ACF6180T Thank you for sharing your insights! It's always fascinating to discuss the history of such iconic vehicles and their developments over time.
A v6 wouldn't fit ...
True! Trying to fit a V6 in there would be like trying to squeeze an elephant into a phone booth! we could not fit 6 cilinder in the thumbnail, sometimes we even have trouble spelling , we apreciate your thoughts and comments ,
Sure it would, but would require a radiator up front, and tubes to go all the way to the rear panel, to connect to the engine. It shouldn't be much longer than the flat 6, and wouldn't have the air cooling fan on top. Might need a clearance bubble on the decklid. I believe I've heard of someone putting a 3.8 Buick into one.
@@ramblerdave1339 They've done conversions with a Chevrolet V6 4.3 & a Oldsmobile Toronado 8 that fit into the engine compartment with the fans up front as well as the radiator.
@rarecarstorys Its been done with a Chevrolet 4.3 V6 in the Corvairs original engine compartment; They've even done Oldsmobile Tornados V8's out back in the original engine compartment.
I still my 1965 Corvair and wish I still had it!
Typo… 🤦♂️
i am super dyslexic , and i type with sausage fingers , typo are great and fun ... you should see the misspelling and missunderstangs i have with the GF, utter hilarious
You can still get one. Just shop around.
Do your research. Not a V six. Lose the fake voice.👎👎👎 5:32 What is that? Not even close. Corvair suspension photos are easy to find.
Thank you for your feedback! I appreciate your insights and will definitely take them into account for future videos. our resurcher & editor will be sacked and replaced
My brother's had more than one corvair,, safety concerns,, if you can't drive, you should not sit behind the wheel,,, I forget that guys name,, that brought us eye sore 5mph bumpers,, and catalytic convertors,,, cars that cost $20k that we could buy for under $2000,,,,, or buy a used car or VW Bug for $150,, or someone would give you VW Bug for free,, that ran,, lights worked brakes were good,, even have tires you could just drive on,,
It's interesting to hear about your brother's experiences with Corvairs! They definitely had their quirks, and we know the truth ... posted in the details of this film , that guy was curupt, and took money from Porsche & VW, i wonder what eles went on ?
No research, pure smokeshow. Please get it right or just dont post it.
No research? I guess I’m just a smokeshow winging it! 🤷♂️ But hey, at least my hair looks good while I’m at it!
Hard to watch this bs.
I appreciate your feedback! It’s always helpful to know how viewers are feeling about the content. what BS are you refering to ? use time stamps so we can make the corrections
Chevrolet Chevette! Glenn
I hate this AI voiced announcer. Can't it be mixed up a bit? Please?
Thank you for sharing your thoughts! Your input really helps me improve my content. we did have a Voice over guy, but the cost was out of my own pocket , and i hads to cut back when my dad went to hospital to pay the bills , i am sure you can understand those challanges
The last two years had all the corrections and a turbo model
Absolutely! It's fascinating to see how much has evolved in just two years. The corrections and turbo model really illustrate how quickly things can change!
Nope, wrong ! `65 and `66 were the prime development years, GM saw the writing on the wall after Nader`s hatchet job, so they did not put any R&D money into the Corvair for it`s final 3 years on the market. That was a shame....
@@blackwaterdogs4256 The muscle cars is what really hurt the Corvair the Mustang, & GM like you commented no more r&d, &didn't want it competing with the Camaro. I still own 3 Corvairs 64,65, & a 67.
@@ACF6180T Yeah, good points, all valid. Where GM REALLY missed the boat is that the (more refined) Corvair could have co-existed quite well with the Camaro, as well as other full-sized Chevys. The Corvair reached a much wider (family) market, with 4-door models, a wagon, the Greenbriar Van, and the Rampside pickup. GM`s short-sightedness led to a serious ass whipping by a flood of Japanese invaders shortly after the Corvair`s demise.
looks like a monza. corsa badge was behind the door, low on the body panel.
Thanks for pointing that out! The Monza and Corsa have some interesting similarities, and I appreciate your keen eye for detail!
it was labeled " unsafe at any speed"
thank goodness it was not a ford pinto!
Ignorance is not kind to those who believe it.
🎉Love the sounds
Now we know the truth, the Porsche and Volkswagen, which are subsidiaries of each other paid a large amount of money to Ralph Nader to write a hit piece on the Corvair, because it was in direct competition with the sales of beetle and other Volkswagen and Porsche products the truth is both of the Volkswagen beetle and the Corvair because of their rear engine the front suspension is light and is not as responsive so people believed the lie they were told about the Corvair. This is a well documented. But under reported
It's fascinating how the automotive industry has so many hidden stories! The competition between these brands definitely shaped public perception in ways we’re still uncovering today. we added your comment in the details , and with your blessing will add it to our next corvair film , Mike you are awsome!
I'm a Corvair enthusiast, & still own 3 of them going back to 1987, & have quite a library on Corvairs, & have never heard of this; Could you please name some sources as I would like too research this info. Thank you.
@@ACF6180T yes, I will try to find you some of the articles I have read, but there is something on TH-cam. I saw a couple of years ago if I can find the info I will try to send it to you.
This car was and is gorgeous.
Right? It’s such a stunner! I could stare at it all day!
There was never a v6 in the corsair. A horizontally opposed 6 cylinder, yes. But not a v6.
You're absolutely right! The Corsair definitely had a unique engine setup, and it's always great to clarify those details for fellow enthusiasts.
the thumbnail . is back with the designer, having a tweek , i have faith you will aprove and write a positive comment back
Wrong wrong and wrong about everything!
what is the differance between criticism and constructive criticism ?
one has information within it , that helps us make the necessary adjustmens , we enjoy our errors being pointed out and fact checked , this is how we learn and grow , please share your thoughts on , WRONG, WRONG and WRONG, with time stamps ,
OK, let`s cut to the chase here. The IMPORTANT thing is that this video even exists ! While not perfect in every detail, the creator made an effort to give us useful content. Let`s show some LOVE & APPRECIATION for a GREAT automobile !
Nader was wrong! GM should have sued!
It's definitely a hot topic! The implications of Nader's actions and GM's response could have changed the automotive landscape.
He was was proved wrong in a court of law in 1972 along with the DOT.
Forgot Spider
the spider needs its own film, simply stunning
Why did you Call it a V-6 in the title Block. It was a nightmare to drive fast on anything but a straight road. You are full of Hot Air as the cars you seem to be driving are heavily modified Corvairs'. They just don't push the stock ones hard. If you lived in the Southwest desert areas after two hot summers you better change the belt and the push rod tube o rings. If you lived in cold northern States You better change the belt for the second winter and also the rear Main seals and o rings gave problems especially if you hadn't gone to a winter grade oil. OMG then there was all the problems with the Heater and defroster. The Corvair was dangerous in the ice and snow and many drivers not familiar with rear drive handling characteristics found themselves in the ditch or in the ditch on the opposite side of the road. I worked at Chev Olds Caddy Dealership from latte 59 till Nov. 67 and saw it all. Some buyers ended up critically injured and a couple of owners ended in the Morgue's. Ralph Nader was right GM knew they put a stinker on the road But ignored the customers complaints opting to the cheaper path paying off the lawsuits out of court. It's SAD as they finally had made the Corvair a great machine by 1969 but it was a little too Late. YEPP it was a good looking death trap in the hands of the general public.
Unsafe flat 6, sounded like a problem my landlord would deal with.
we had 2 other thumbnails , killer corsa, scared yenko, but the youtube audiance chose UNSAFE V6, funny how this all works
Thank you for sharing your insights, Ralph! It’s clear you have a wealth of experience with the Corvair, and your perspective on its handling and maintenance challenges is invaluable.
V6………. Really??????
as funny as it sounds, we ask our thumbnail designer to put flat 6 , and it look so weird we simplified it visually , thank you for noticing and sharing your thoughts
This is an extremely flawed story. It isn't possible to correct it in a few sentences.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts! Constructive criticism helps me grow, and I truly value your perspective.
Ralph Nader killed this car
Thank you for sharing your thoughts! Nader's influence on car safety is definitely a topic worth discussing.
Not totally correct Ford Mustang, GM, & the advent of the muscle car did along with the coming Chevrolet Camaro, But Nader didn't help either.
So WHY was the Corvair unsafe? No time for that info, eh?
it is in the discription, we will be expanding on this with first gen covairs, and hoping to get more accurate information , from the corvair fourm , to double check the accuracy , this is how we learn and grow , from our mistakes ( unexpected adventures into the unknown ) thank you for sharing your thoughts
This has so much completely incorrect information, it should be flagged. This is AI at its very worst. Words matter and this is garbage. If there is a real person somewhere here, do some research instead of making things up, conflating models, engines and pictures of mostly modified and inaccurate representations of Corvairs in general.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts! I appreciate your feedback and will definitely take it into consideration for future videos. Accuracy is important, and I'm always looking to improve. we are learning and we are spending our own savings while my dad is in hospital , i built this channel to share with him and our love of cars together .... and hopefull pay the hospital bills ... if you can pray , and make a donation to a cancer charity ....love will always overcome the negativity and darkness
I will not watch this video. It's blatantly wrong in the thumb nail.
A I does not work.
I appreciate your perspective! It's always important to question the information we come across. If you ever change your mind, I'd love to hear your thoughts after watching! this is how we learn and grow
bs by 65 the corvair problems were solved no other problems than almost all cars had . the srear uspension was solved by 62
and if teflon seales had been invented the minor oil leaks would also be solved i owned a 64 and dont regreat buying it
Ralph nader cause big damage to a great car
It's interesting how one person's advocacy can lead to such significant changes in the automotive industry. Nader's became famous of the damage he caused chrysler
I swear the Sideview is the early Camaro body
what time stamp is that? what gen camaro are you thinking
I have 2 2nd gen. Corvairs, & people always say it looks like a Camaro; I just reply the Camaro looks like a Corvair at least the 1st gen Camaro.