Spencer testing Transonic Sweeper

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 495

  • @cabanford
    @cabanford 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +212

    Speed: 344 mph / 553 kmh.
    This info is from his link in the description. Plane is designed as a test model for lighter winds (in this case 30-40 mph). He's now working on a full design for strong winds - this thing's going to get close to the sound barrier 💣🚀)

    • @silentblackhole
      @silentblackhole 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Control it from a bunker, or at least the boot of the car!

    • @dannydecamp6846
      @dannydecamp6846 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      This is so wild, I showed my dad this (retired fighter pilot/ commercial pilot) and he didn’t even believe this. Where can I find more info about this? Is there a name for this sport/type of gliding??

    • @cabanford
      @cabanford 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      @@dannydecamp6846 it's called DS (for Dynamic Soaring). Amazing stuff, well worth falling into a rabbit hole for.

    • @weatheranddarkness
      @weatheranddarkness 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@dannydecamp6846 the pilot here did a presentation about the physics here: th-cam.com/video/nv7-YM4wno8/w-d-xo.html

    • @caturlifelive
      @caturlifelive 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@cabanford thank you

  • @mikeadams7832
    @mikeadams7832 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Nice!!! That thing is nasty looking! Congrats guys, look forward to seeing it break the record

  • @briani7858
    @briani7858 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    pretty cool

  • @Shopweasel
    @Shopweasel 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Needs drone automation assistance.been nice to see some figure 8's a few stalls and ect ect.
    Itl get there.
    Intimidating to fly.but drone teck can smooth her up nicely.😁

  • @goldendredger
    @goldendredger 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +54

    This RC genre is the Pinnacle of RC planes. Absolutely incredible. I fly lots of RC planes in all sorts of models. 3d, Warbirds,Stol,Scale, Jets, gliders, whatever. But these slope planes that fly in these locations that generate extreme speed off the wind rolling over the top of the ridge then down into the low pressure pocket then back into the high pressure over the ridge just blow your mind. The speed and sound! Just perfection. Adrenaline pumping RC flights. And planes built to withstand the G-load are a work of art and incredible. I have seen many explode. But when a fella gets it right and has lots of exploded planes under his belt the outcome can be truly amazing. Props to the pilot and builder (most the time one in the same) and keep the videos and planes coming. Love it!

  • @isaiahhiggins
    @isaiahhiggins 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +54

    the wing loading must be incredible

    • @jackroutledge352
      @jackroutledge352 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      It's really light, so might not be very much. If the wing loading was high it wouldn't be very efficient, and so probably wouldn't pick up as much speed.

    • @isaiahhiggins
      @isaiahhiggins 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@jackroutledge352 I prove once again that I don't know what I'm talking about 🤐I meant the G-loading due to those violent, high speed loops. I guess wing stress would be more accurate.

    • @lr21643
      @lr21643 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@jackroutledge352 High wing loadings don't mean low efficiency, they mean flying faster at the same angle of attack. At least until you get into the transonic region, anyway. Viscosity can be less important as speed and size go up, so an aircraft may have a slightly better L/D as it gets heavier. This is especially true of models.

    • @UltraVioletYS
      @UltraVioletYS 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@isaiahhiggins Based on 553km/h and ~4 seconds per loop, the average acceleration comes out to 24.5G for an apparent weight of 127kg. Kind of wild. You could work out the wing loading from the 130" wingspan and the photo at the beginning

    • @TheHarryMann
      @TheHarryMann 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jackroutledge352completely opposite to the aeronautical facts of design. You need high wing loading to achieve high speeds, or rather, high wing loading mitigates towards high speed and vice versa

  • @PacificAirwave144
    @PacificAirwave144 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

    Never been at a site seeing it happen but these TH-cam videos still take my breath away. Tough damn airplanes and great pilots!

    • @MelindaGreen
      @MelindaGreen 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      I prefer seeing it from a safely remote location. I'd be too afraid of losing my head if he sneezes!

  • @Adeptus_Artes
    @Adeptus_Artes 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +143

    Wait, so this is just powered by the wind like a glider? That's freakin awesome!
    Edit: Everybody, please stop explaining to me how this works. I understand the physics of it. I know how a glider works. I get it, "powered" was a poor choice of word to use. I have just never seen anything like this before and it blew my noggin up.

    • @pcka12
      @pcka12 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      Gliders are not 'powered by the wind' although they may 'translate' moving currents of air into 'lift'!

    • @erickborling1302
      @erickborling1302 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Yes gliders are always descending relative to the wind.

    • @maxvanN
      @maxvanN 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      gliders aren't powered by the wind, they just move through the wind. They are powered by any uplift caused by thermal differences causing convection. This is all caused by the sun so basically it is solar powered.

    • @caturlifelive
      @caturlifelive 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Agreed, awesome

    • @TylerKaraszewski
      @TylerKaraszewski 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      @@pcka12 This is an interesting semantic discussion. Are sailboats powered by the wind? ;) I think in either case it depends on what you mean by "powered". Both generate lift from the difference in the movement of the air relative to the surface. In dead still air, both eventually drift to a stop.

  • @mattridgway8807
    @mattridgway8807 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    This is just beyond what should be real. Never seen anything like that. So fast what a superb model and amazing design.

    • @anthonyb5279
      @anthonyb5279 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thats because its not real

  • @arwo1143
    @arwo1143 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +68

    1) the engineering on those wings is absolutely nuts, the wing loading must be incredible
    2) no way in hell I’d be standing that close, one wrong move on the sticks and you decapitate three people
    Props boys, that’s amazing

    • @ChrisMisMYhandle
      @ChrisMisMYhandle 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      no props, just wind

    • @nateisright
      @nateisright 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      😂“Props” = proper respect , not propeller

    • @ChrisMisMYhandle
      @ChrisMisMYhandle 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@nateisright that's what makes it a joke 😊

    • @ernie5229
      @ernie5229 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The odds of one plane decapitating 3 people are zero. Even if lined up correctly, it's only a 186 oz plane. After the first decapitation there wouldn't be enough energy for the other two. Chill, bruv.

    • @dsdy1205
      @dsdy1205 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ernie5229 XD
      On a side note I watched a video where they crashed one of these things into the hillside they were standing on, there was a very audible ground-shaking THUMP, akin to a car crash.

  • @aga080
    @aga080 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    lol you could not pay me enough to stand near that thing going transonic. one hiccup the crowd is sliced in half. you guys should build a plexiglass structure to stand behind (not even sure what that will do)

    • @LateralThinkerer
      @LateralThinkerer 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This - It's a flying straight razor. A chain link fence would do it...I hope!

    • @toolbaggers
      @toolbaggers 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'd be spectating behind the trucks!

    • @toolbaggers
      @toolbaggers 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@LateralThinkerer More like flying 2 long swords

  • @alexcrisara4902
    @alexcrisara4902 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    This airframe sounds absolutely incredible - never heard something quite like it. Initially I thought the video was sped up but this is an absolutely wild kind of flying!

  • @Itsjustme-Justme
    @Itsjustme-Justme 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    Don't forget that transsonig flight requires a swept empennage too. You want any part of the plane go supersonic first, but most certainly not your elevator.

    • @Lanzbik
      @Lanzbik 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And also make sure it’s a full flying elevator so the shockwave caused by the leading edge of the tailplane doesn’t shroud the elevator

  • @needmoreboost6369
    @needmoreboost6369 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +62

    I’m going to have to say this is the pinnacle of rc! There’s nothing even close! Fpv drones,turbines,nitro or gas anything and nothing brushless could dream of this rawness!

    • @marielizysurourcq
      @marielizysurourcq 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      You are right. I went crazy on drones and then planes, but I have to say that nothing beats watching high speed gliders. It's very close to surfing big ocean waves in a way.

    • @needmoreboost6369
      @needmoreboost6369 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@marielizysurourcq surfing is a pretty good comparison! in part what I meant is,it’s just pure! My gliders would clap their wing tips like an applause to the surviving plane’s of this type of slope and speed as they went down!

    • @anotherguy9402
      @anotherguy9402 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Then you haven't seen rc racing planes

    • @Maximum_777
      @Maximum_777 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Have you seen this video of a 548mph sail plane? They had significantly higher winds there. th-cam.com/video/4eFD_Wj6dhk/w-d-xo.htmlsi=lGyxR9D-qrGl_fb6

    • @davidsullivan8236
      @davidsullivan8236 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      This is amazing it could fly forever imagine if was scaled up

  • @aaindtharivalan8720
    @aaindtharivalan8720 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    It's very cool. Pilot is very skilled. Any chance of camera on board?

  • @gisall8205
    @gisall8205 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    GOD forbid you have to sneeze, or a bug hits you in the eye. Incredible Piloting skills.

    • @kamoteph273
      @kamoteph273 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      please no, you dont want that thing ending up stucked at someone's forehead😂

    • @kamoteph273
      @kamoteph273 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @Bebtelovimab 🤣🤣🤣

  • @Keatwonobe
    @Keatwonobe 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    I love it when I find a video with a ton more views than subs like this. Just looks and sounds unreal. The future's going to be lit because of folks like you. Keep it up!

  • @dorsetdumpling5387
    @dorsetdumpling5387 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    ..when a B52 dreams of losing weight and becoming a glider…..!

    • @toolbaggers
      @toolbaggers 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      BUFF doesn't want to be an fat, angry bird.

  • @r0cketplumber
    @r0cketplumber 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    248 m/s and 5.2 kg is about 160,000 J kinetic energy. Typical muzzle energy for a handgun round at a similar speed is around 500 J. I would rather watch that fly from behind some significant armor.

    • @mrt1957
      @mrt1957 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      a grain of sand at 556.997 miles per hour would be a concern. This flying razor is terrifying and fascination.

    • @keppscrossing
      @keppscrossing 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Several years ago I calculated the kinetic energy of one of my friends planes when he was radared at 284 mph with an 8 1/2 pound plane. It was about 26,000 foot pounds of force, or double that of a military 50 caliber round. Previously we had been using our trucks to hide behind, but realized that only the engine block would protect us. That plane would probably go right through the sheet-metal of a pick up truck. Another time I watched a plane penetrate 18 inches into very rocky soil after being retarded about 150 mph before the wing broke. That plane was not designed for dynamic soaring.

  • @harfenspieler
    @harfenspieler 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    The kinetic energy at full speed is around 20 kilojoules, and it takes a split second from pilot error to impact. Personally I'd be hiding behind those rocks…

    • @CGreciful
      @CGreciful 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I was going to say a blast shield! Pilot error, control surface failure, electronics failure....

    • @Xsiondu
      @Xsiondu 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Transonic flutter magic.

  • @Part_121
    @Part_121 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    That amount of wing sweep reminds me of a B-52. It also reminds me of a flying razor blade!

    • @mikebeacom4883
      @mikebeacom4883 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Like an anorexic B-52

    • @cabanford
      @cabanford 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@mikebeacom4883 Hahaha 🤣 (my dad was a Navigator in BUFFs from the mid 60s to the early 80s).

  • @tuinhekdeurtje5910
    @tuinhekdeurtje5910 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I know hes a good pilot, but i'd be sitting in the car the whole time that thing is in the air

  • @GlideYNRG
    @GlideYNRG 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Have been listening to some interviews with the Perlan 2 pilot and the limits they have reached with the Perlan 2 at height. If another is built its to explore the transonic regions next. They are right on the limit with the current wing.

  • @kluper1157
    @kluper1157 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Where are you Flying Prefect Hill!!!

  • @bgdexter
    @bgdexter 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Awesome design & insane build quality. At these speeds, with that wing layout, even slight differences in the wings will cause much trouble.

  • @confuseatronica
    @confuseatronica 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    ahhh theres this compression artifact that youtube causes which makes it look like parts are coming off the plane. I keep thinking you lost an aileron OO

  • @ScrubsIsee
    @ScrubsIsee 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Is there a making-of? Or more background info about this build?

  • @sf1203
    @sf1203 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Amazing. Looks like the test went pretty dang well.

  • @RPM-wd9rb
    @RPM-wd9rb 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Perpetual motion ? I mean the plane is moving faster than the existing wind speed , and generating more kinetic energy than the energy keeping it up ?
    I dont know - just smoked some weed thats all .

  • @sbkenn1
    @sbkenn1 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Reminds me a bit of a symmetrical wing V-tail glider that I built in 1980. Not QUITE as fast as this one, but still the fastest at Ivinghoe Beacon in England.

  • @hoagietime1
    @hoagietime1 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hey FAA, why does this need a remote ID module?

  • @michaelwhinnery164
    @michaelwhinnery164 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Impressive that the wing didn't snap in two.

    • @atvheads
      @atvheads 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No batteries, and no engine. that's why i guess.

    • @weatheranddarkness
      @weatheranddarkness 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Part of the reason is that most of the mass is evenly distributed across the wings and so is well supported under the G loads, the fuselage mass is a less acute stress riser than in some other aircraft.

    • @ccm_priv
      @ccm_priv 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      it needs batteries for steering bud@@atvheads

  • @JasonCarmichael
    @JasonCarmichael 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Need sensor data!
    I can't imagine the G load on this beast.

    • @farrider3339
      @farrider3339 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Exactly my concern :
      11 + g

  • @PlasmaChannel
    @PlasmaChannel 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This is incredibly impressive. That speed from a non-powered glider.

  • @knutbergan
    @knutbergan 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    So what speed did you manage to attain on this flight?

  • @karlhawley342
    @karlhawley342 8 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    where are you flying at? 👍🇺🇸🙋🏻

  • @ПламенВенцеславов
    @ПламенВенцеславов 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    The new bird flies very quietly and smoothly, in a more dynamic atmosphere it will improve the record with good control! As for a familiarization flight, it is very good!

  • @skyak4493
    @skyak4493 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Fantastic plane and piloting. I have one suggestion/request -please get one of those furry covers for your microphone. It will do wonders for the video sound on that windy hill and the sound of the plane might yield some info about where the flow is going transonic.

  • @smile768
    @smile768 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This really is very very impressive work guys. I'm sure you'll be arrested for breaking the laws of physics soon.

  • @donzioldbuddy
    @donzioldbuddy 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Will there be a sonic boom at some point in the near future??

  • @ck2503
    @ck2503 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    What a crazy cool contraption. I would be interested to know how much time went into designing those wings.

  • @petemack3076
    @petemack3076 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    350mph is not transonic! That is turboprop speed. Or even WWII fighter speed. But I agree that is crazy fast for a glider.

    • @budyeddi5814
      @budyeddi5814 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The current record is nearly 600mph by the same guy in this video IIRC, and that's with an unswept wing. This is the initial testing of their swept wing designs if I had to guess

  • @timothyconover9805
    @timothyconover9805 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I would hide behind a reinforced concrete wall!

  • @mwales2112
    @mwales2112 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Beautiful.. Takes a lot of skill to fly these, but that camera man should get an award....

  • @EdwardKelly-vi9sg
    @EdwardKelly-vi9sg 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    WHAT SPEED IS TRANSONIC...THANX

    • @r0cketplumber
      @r0cketplumber 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Transonic is loosely defined as Mach 0.8 to 1.2, or about 620 to 930 mph at 80F... so on this "light" day it only hits about 556 mph or a mere .72 Mach. Yowza!

    • @EdwardKelly-vi9sg
      @EdwardKelly-vi9sg 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @r0cketplumber THANX...TOTALLY AWSOME

  • @claudevieaul1465
    @claudevieaul1465 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    This is astounding. I've only recently discovered dynamic soaring even existed, here on TH-cam - and as an engineer living near a fairly steep hill (about 50m height, along the river Rhine in the Netherlands) I'm intrigued what could be done with this energy - how to harness it, perhaps in using it with an angled windturbine somehow....

    • @lr21643
      @lr21643 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      If your wind turbine is attached to the ground, you don't need to use dynamic soaring. The tips of some wind turbines may go at 10 times the wind speed, which is probably not so different than we're seeing here.

    • @dougaltolan3017
      @dougaltolan3017 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A tethered kite generator would be the closest, but as lr says above if you have any ground attachment, you don't need dynamic soaring to extract power.

    • @normg2242
      @normg2242 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Funny you should say that. As I was watching this, I wondered if this principle couldn't be applied to wind mills or turbines ...!

  • @dworkeen
    @dworkeen 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    How the hell does anyone have the reactions to control one of these monsters?😮

    • @toolbaggers
      @toolbaggers 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Step one - good eye sight.

    • @sepg5084
      @sepg5084 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Step two - practice

    • @Iam_Yu627
      @Iam_Yu627 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Holiday inn

    • @robambrose4199
      @robambrose4199 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Go pills.

  • @kingtriton7202
    @kingtriton7202 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What am I doing with motors and lipos,??? When this is possible with wind! Incredible

    • @keppscrossing
      @keppscrossing 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      When my friends ask me why I don't have more powered planes I always ask them why I would want to put an air brake (propeller) on the front of a plane and slow it down? Even without dynamic soaring, front side slope gliding can easily produce speeds between 80 and 120 mph when the wind is blowing over 30 mph. My personal record for wind speed is launching a plane in 56 mph winds, and then later that same day measuring 65 mph winds shortly after landing another plane. My friend who owns the radar gun was not there, so I don't know how fast I flew that day, but the speeds I mentioned earlier were verified by radar on days that were not so windy.

  • @weatheranddarkness
    @weatheranddarkness 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Need to film this in higher frame rates. There are only a few frames of the plane per loop at 24fps.
    Also, It's good to see such an extreme design behaving so well outside of its peak environment, seems to soar pretty well on the up draft.

    • @durden91tyler
      @durden91tyler 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Great idea, I'd say it's worth sacrificing resolution down to like 720 if it meant 120fps so it was clear and smooth

    • @linecraftman3907
      @linecraftman3907 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      it's mostly youtube compression of the video

  • @ZdrytchX
    @ZdrytchX 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    excuse me? That sturdiness is insane for how thin that is
    I have to say this is one crazy concept glider

  • @klesmer
    @klesmer 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Never thought I would see a sailplane fly that fast. Fantastic. Where was this video taken? Beautiful country.

    • @toolbaggers
      @toolbaggers 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      The fastest RC planes are sailplanes.

    • @neilbarclay7070
      @neilbarclay7070 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Record for Dynamic Soaring is like 560mph these are full on carbon and kevlar gliders. Balsa,foam, fiberglass just doesn't cut it at these speeds and that's why DS has only come out in recent years of model flying.

    • @bryanlallen
      @bryanlallen 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Weldon, east of Lake Isabella.

    • @treyschwartz3966
      @treyschwartz3966 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@bryanlallen I recognized the location because I windsurf on Lake Isabella and I’ve ridden those roads on the bike. I’ve been thinking of getting an RC glider to slope soar there.

  • @stacyp4534
    @stacyp4534 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    It flies so pretty and slow the takes off like a rocket. That’s crazy. I don’t think this should be possible but yet here it is

  • @johnsnider9780
    @johnsnider9780 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    That was a great recording of your flight. Unfortunately, the gentleman spoke too quietly. And we never actually heard how fast you went.523?

  • @Avianthro
    @Avianthro 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Amazing that the same phenomenon used by an albatross to stay aloft for weeks or months can also take a model sailplane up to transonic speed. Fantastic work and flying! Good luck with the next phase! Maybe we'll be hearing a sonic boom? That would really be something!

    • @ChrisNobodySpecial
      @ChrisNobodySpecial 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How fast is it going? Transonic would need to be around 720 mph and a little less depending on the altitude.

    • @Cyberdactyl
      @Cyberdactyl 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ChrisNobodySpecial My wild guess is around 238 mph. I am taking a wild guess he's doing 400 foot diameter loops. That's 1257 feet per loop. I timed his loop at around 3.6 seconds. That into 1257 is 349 feet per second or 238 mph

  • @cameronlapworth2284
    @cameronlapworth2284 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Has anyone tried to dynamically soar with a manned glider?

  • @hal_aetus
    @hal_aetus 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Beautiful! What speeds were you registering on the radar gun?

  • @BikingVikingHH
    @BikingVikingHH 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Why not sweep the horizontal stabilizer?

    • @JinKee
      @JinKee 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I also want to know. Is it because the tail shock is in free air behind the aircraft so it can't upset the flight?

    • @emotodude
      @emotodude 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Sweeping the tail not as important because not as fat a wing to accelerate the air around it. But at some point yeah it might be needed

    • @BikingVikingHH
      @BikingVikingHH 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@emotodude isn’t the sweep more about the shockwave?

    • @tstodgell
      @tstodgell 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@BikingVikingHHa forebody in front of the T tail junction would probably be enough transonic drag reduction. The vertical stab doesn't really need to be swept to reduce wave drag unless it's heavily loaded.
      The glider will likely need more nose up trim as the CP moves aft at transonic speeds, though the increase in induced drag on the vertical stab is still kinda minimal. I think it's smart to stick with a straight stabilizer for the sake of keeping it thin and avoiding flutter. Thin and stiff is less draggy that fat and floppy, right?

  • @coma13794
    @coma13794 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    well, of COURSE Spencer built a swept wing transonic glider. ##$##@#@#@ why did I move from California to NJ!?! Congrats to all involved, can't wait to see the results with the fully loaded model on a big day.

  • @spud13x13
    @spud13x13 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Forget about flying that fast...I can't even SEE that fast!

  • @ВикторПрокопюк-ъ1н
    @ВикторПрокопюк-ъ1н 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Очень хороший планер, скорость сумасшедшая! 😊

  • @gasisthepastendoil
    @gasisthepastendoil 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    wow...... It must be really strong in the center section

  • @mark6302
    @mark6302 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    holy shit!

  • @dandavis8901
    @dandavis8901 18 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Nice cam work, Mehrdad! I can actually follow the airplane! What were you using to film?

  • @xoio
    @xoio 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If the current record is 548mph with a straight wing, what might the intended speed target be with this swept wing glider? 600mph+?

  • @Imba-gt7qi
    @Imba-gt7qi 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Incredible control by the pilot. One glimp of a movement and crash. Have you an G-Meter inside? FPV Camera will be an awesome rollercoaster.

  • @gregoryvangaya8971
    @gregoryvangaya8971 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What kind of efficiency do you think this gets on long, way point like flight?... Wait! There's no propulsion!?!?!!?!!!

  • @solosailorsv8065
    @solosailorsv8065 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    "But the BOOK says that won't work..." - Books are old and just a start my boy, go BUILD SOMETHING GREAT !!

  • @InfoWithheld
    @InfoWithheld 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    What speeds? With wind-noise and no added text overlays, all I hear is (muffle)47, (muffle 56) etc.

    • @doggylover1958
      @doggylover1958 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      About 556mph.

    • @InfoWithheld
      @InfoWithheld 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@doggylover1958 damn! Despite "transonic" in the title... i was expecting to hear 247, or at most 347. Not 500+.

    • @doggylover1958
      @doggylover1958 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@InfoWithheld The record set in Feb this year was 564 mph, I don’t know how they can see the plane at those speeds.
      th-cam.com/video/GCVK3w5DHbk/w-d-xo.htmlfeature=shared

  • @rdbchase
    @rdbchase 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    transonic
    [ tran-son-ik ]
    adjective Chiefly Aeronautics.
    close to the speed of propagation of sound; moving at 700-780 miles per hour (1127-1255 km/h) at sea level.

  • @friedaspyder8485
    @friedaspyder8485 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is there an autopiloting system for dynamic soaring? Checking... yup fgfs.

  • @alfredojohannes6827
    @alfredojohannes6827 หลายเดือนก่อน

    3 hours later... "We have achieved light fusion and are preparing to engage warp drive!"

  • @michaelogden5958
    @michaelogden5958 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Impressive! Sweeper wings flying by reminds me of swift (bird) wings. No coincidence, I'm sure. 🙂

  • @ПетяПяточкин-и8я
    @ПетяПяточкин-и8я 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Малейшая ошибка и проткнет человека насквозь или голову отрубит. Скорость и прочность планера потрясающие.

  • @JohnnyMotel99
    @JohnnyMotel99 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Pilot must have effing good eyesight! I'd have to paint it lurid pink to see it clearly...

  • @RothRothschild-xj3nx
    @RothRothschild-xj3nx 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love all RC toys but gliders - especially unpowered are Koolest AF !!!

  • @mpojr
    @mpojr 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    l been flying rc for 50 years and l would like to know more about this ultra high performance sport looks crazy fun.

  • @CBlargh
    @CBlargh 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I kept looking for the engines. What is this sorcery!?

    • @Porculus
      @Porculus 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Look up ''dynamic soaring''

  • @HoundDogMech
    @HoundDogMech 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    PLZ leave the TITLES on for more 45 Frames (1.5 seconds) Bro.

  • @gdutfulkbhh7537
    @gdutfulkbhh7537 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Congratulations. That is wonderful.

  • @Neptune730
    @Neptune730 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Holy expletives Batman. That sucker is fast.

  • @wovada
    @wovada 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What is his maximum speed, probably 200 km/h?

  • @pangrac1
    @pangrac1 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why you dont put huge chunky fury cat on you microphone so we can enjoy real clear sound of that insane maschine instead of that annoying wind noise is beyond my understanding. 🙈🤷‍♂️🙉👎

  • @P47-i4u
    @P47-i4u 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ill bet those wings were incredibly bombproof, but still, some flex going on there...

  • @cadthunkin
    @cadthunkin 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If I showed up to local slope with such a weapon, I would bring a security detail and everyone would believe I was testing for the military, lol.

  • @catatonicbug7522
    @catatonicbug7522 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    A couple more MPH and you'll fly back in time!

  • @angellestat2730
    @angellestat2730 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    maybe this effect could be exploited for some kind of wind power device.
    of course, sadly, any hardware that would be able to extract power from this effect will be fixed to certain wind direction.

  • @jeanlefranc3817
    @jeanlefranc3817 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Must be quickly boring to pilot, only circling around, but the engineering is impressive

  • @ForgottenMan2009
    @ForgottenMan2009 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Are these guys in any way connected to the Perlan project?
    At very high altitude the ability to exceed the speed of sound would be usefull I would have thought.

  • @RichardBronosky
    @RichardBronosky 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Amazing flying! My Dad always made my cover our plane in Hi-Viz Pink so that we didn't lose it in the sky. I always hated that. But if I were you, I'd put Hi-Viz Pink on bottom and Hi-Viz Green on top. Using white is the last thing I'd do. A close 2nd would be sky blue.

  • @TilmanBaumann
    @TilmanBaumann 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I almost don't care how fast it is. The design makes it LOOK fast.

  • @gasisthepastendoil
    @gasisthepastendoil 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Texas- just fly fast ballasted gliders in a straight line..... When you hit lift you pull the nose up as the same top of affect...

  • @RiDankulous
    @RiDankulous 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I watch ridge soaring of gliders and think how useful it would be to harness that for renewable energy but of course it's costly to get windmills up in many of those locations, plus they need to be fairly close to population centers that can use the electricity.

  • @po1ly414
    @po1ly414 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    That turn’s easily got to be 15-20 Gs, just amazing engineering

    • @nonotrasher
      @nonotrasher 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      about 80

    • @MrSteve2714740
      @MrSteve2714740 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      More like between 75 and 90 G. Insanity isn’t it.?

    • @lr21643
      @lr21643 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MrSteve2714740 Does that mean the ride is bumpy or that I'm over-estimating the turning radius?

    • @MrSteve2714740
      @MrSteve2714740 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Wouldn’t say it’s bumpy. And at “normal” sort of speeds the circuit is large. But speeds like this it’s obviously going to be a tight turn. The pilot flying really knows his stuff. Not many RC pilots could even contemplate the difficulty flying at these sort of speeds. I’ve flown fast slope soarers in my 40yr area of RC planes but I’m no where confident enough to enter into the dynamic zone. These gliders are incredibly fast and on another level. Big respect to the dynamic lads in my opinion.

  • @michal5642
    @michal5642 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Damn, I wonder if one day we will have supersonic dynamic soaring.

  • @igorbaykulov76
    @igorbaykulov76 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Странныые блики в нижнем левом углу экрана во время пролета планера за холмом... Брехня?

  • @lucacappelletti6256
    @lucacappelletti6256 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I cannot watch the video due to yt restriction against adblock, can you publish on a Peertube istance please?

  • @Adeptus_Artes
    @Adeptus_Artes 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just out of curiosity, if you slammed that into the side of the hill/mountain/whatever by accident, how much $$ did you just lose?

  • @danizweifler6061
    @danizweifler6061 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    one question: how good are your eyes ? = Give me a percentage in correctect or non-corrected values please, thanks

  • @jimmcnally2524
    @jimmcnally2524 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Marines just called. They want to know how much c4 can you fit in that thing.

  • @wernerschulte6245
    @wernerschulte6245 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Amazing ! Is the wing sweep a significant advantage at those speedes ?