Why on a rare craft that looks to be an airworthy frame? I’m in the process of buying a 175. Nice to see how strong they are but I’d rather have taken the word on the street.
And what did NASA learn from this experiment? In a collision between a light aircraft and six thousand six hundred million, million, million tonnes of rock, the plane loses.
As someone who would kill for one of those, this hurts
Why on a rare craft that looks to be an airworthy frame? I’m in the process of buying a 175. Nice to see how strong they are but I’d rather have taken the word on the street.
I don’t believe that impact would have been survivable without significant, life-changing injuries.
And what did NASA learn from this experiment?
In a collision between a light aircraft and six thousand six hundred million, million, million tonnes of rock, the plane loses.
It'll probably just buff out
Why are they doing crash tests they've already been done by the way on aircraft designed in the fifties and sixties?
Additional data being measured
It's right there in the description!
"to test emergency locator transmitters (ELTs) in simulated severe but survivable plane accidents."
The better question is, why are we paying for it?
I'll take the Fokker F-28 thanks.
I soloed in that airplane
Any landing you can walk away from...