What's the Deal With A = 440 Hz vs 432 Hz? Let's Talk!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 ก.ย. 2024
  • This is by far the most frequent question I get asked so I finally decided to weigh in on it. I brought in 3 experts to weigh in as well. What are your thoughts?
    Links to Follow:
    If you are interested in purchasing The Beato Book please email me at rickbeato1@gmail.com
    If you would like to donate to my channel to support my video creation you can use my PayPal address rickbeato1@gmail.com
    Skype Lessons are available on a limited basis. If you are interested please write me at rickbeato1@gmail.com
    TH-cam - / rickbeato
    Artist Facebook - / rickbeatoproduction
    Personal Facebook - / rick.beato.1
    Instagram - / rickbeato1
    Follow On Twitter - @rickbeato
    www.nuryl.com

ความคิดเห็น • 998

  • @cj600cj2
    @cj600cj2 5 ปีที่แล้ว +680

    SPIRITUAL so in the building

    • @rubal7577
      @rubal7577 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      CJ 600CJ lmaoo

    • @cappocutz3872
      @cappocutz3872 5 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Sun gazing so in the build

    • @Treezy_205
      @Treezy_205 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Dats why I came here😂

    • @prettyboyyjo
      @prettyboyyjo 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I just left from his video 😂

    • @eloicocard7501
      @eloicocard7501 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Woke so in da buildin man

  • @prettyboyyjo
    @prettyboyyjo 5 ปีที่แล้ว +402

    Spiritual So brought me to this video 💯

    • @DwayKeezy
      @DwayKeezy 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      J O J O same

    • @marcc7375
      @marcc7375 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same

    • @silversmith333
      @silversmith333 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      More like Manic So but u right

    • @kenn1212
      @kenn1212 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thats tuff

    • @MrVonWick
      @MrVonWick 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Me too

  • @Shadowballer23
    @Shadowballer23 5 ปีที่แล้ว +217

    So luminati sent me

  • @mantreygaming7721
    @mantreygaming7721 5 ปีที่แล้ว +769

    Who came from solluminati

    • @eloicocard7501
      @eloicocard7501 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      He been sun gazing too much he’s starting to know too much about the world

    • @brotherxbear3969
      @brotherxbear3969 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      On god

    • @jaygotkashh
      @jaygotkashh 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Me

    • @ytsquad7791
      @ytsquad7791 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Me

    • @nmdolo223
      @nmdolo223 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mantrey Gaming Ctfu me

  • @Buonarr
    @Buonarr 4 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    finally a succinct youtube video actually covering the topic without 3 minutes of intro, five minutes of fluff, and 2 minutes of actual content. cheers mate

    • @TheKatchutes
      @TheKatchutes 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      But he doesn’t actually cover it very well… lots of sarcasm and no real opinion or analysis of 432 and how it sounds to him! Pft

  • @quailstudios
    @quailstudios 5 ปีที่แล้ว +115

    This is the best video I’ve ever seen on A 432 versus A 440 comparison! I especially like the way that the experts weighed in right at the end. Brilliant Rick!

    • @MontoyaMatrix
      @MontoyaMatrix ปีที่แล้ว

      Ha.

    • @A-432-Zone
      @A-432-Zone 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Mr. Quail, are you out there? I'm a music theorist, and I've tried twice to relay a statement to you but each time, my very words were simplly, and somehow made to be gone. I"m trying make by wording more ambiguous in hopes of by-passing the you-know-what.

  • @ZeroFunctional
    @ZeroFunctional 7 ปีที่แล้ว +297

    Wow, three experts featured in one video? Quality has really come a long way.

    • @RickBeato
      @RickBeato  7 ปีที่แล้ว +117

      ZeroFunctional I felt I needed some other opinions. Haha! Only Dylan knew what I was talking about. He really is an expert because he can hear the difference.

    • @classicalhero7
      @classicalhero7 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Rick Beato Examples would have been good to hear the difference.

    • @AXPena
      @AXPena 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Sounding off with the Beato trio?

    • @midimusician6359
      @midimusician6359 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Very funny :D

    • @MSAMultimedia
      @MSAMultimedia 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Can he recognize chords in 432hz?

  • @tayunchii
    @tayunchii 5 ปีที่แล้ว +180

    SPIRITUAL so in the BUILDING

    • @the-engneer
      @the-engneer 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Glad to know you take advice from a guy who stares at the sun

    • @touchgrassbro9889
      @touchgrassbro9889 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@the-engneer kinda interesting that the guy who stares at the sun is right tho 🤔

    • @the-engneer
      @the-engneer 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@touchgrassbro9889 right about what exactly?

    • @touchgrassbro9889
      @touchgrassbro9889 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@the-engneer staring at the sun gives positive energy. It comes from the universe. It is similar to meditation

  • @m.e.c.j.5125
    @m.e.c.j.5125 3 ปีที่แล้ว +66

    I absolutely love everything about how my guitar sounds and FEELS/RESPONDS; even through the amp, when tuned to my preferred Ab/Drop Db = 432Hz. However, considering nearly every piece of recorded music that i grew up listening to; and still do, was recorded using A = 440Hz(or some variation of it), so learning/jamming along with pre-recorded music or friends, is impractical. But my love of 432Hz has nothing to do with any mystical, cosmic, or devine theories. I can only say that when my guitar is tuned to Ab/Db = 432Hz, it just sounds, feels, and responds in a much more "relaxed" way. Not so tense/intense. If that makes any sense.

    • @ΟΟύτις
      @ΟΟύτις 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Ab means that E string is Eb? I think this is 415hz

    • @sage9836
      @sage9836 ปีที่แล้ว

      I like half step flat alot on my classical because it's mellowed out and more rich sounding. I am also going to try A 432 and half step flat from there. I wonder if the strings will sound floppy. . .

    • @bilalentilka
      @bilalentilka ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@micahmeneyerji you are just speculating on his behalf. singers strain voices singing lower notes in 440, than higher notes in 432.

    • @manictiger
      @manictiger ปีที่แล้ว +6

      432 is much more mathematically clean. 3 x 12 x 12 = 432. Generally, when I'm modding games, I like multiples of 12, because 12 is in common with both base 3 and base 2 and has crossovers with base 8. Idk, I just like base 12. It's a really nice number. In music, it probably doesn't matter. Most people don't even appreciate the instrumentation of a song, let alone are able to hear a 1.8% difference in pitch.

    • @dancreed
      @dancreed 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@manictigerinteresting! Western music is divided into 12 notes.
      So is time, clocks and calendars.
      And we used to use the imperial measurement system 12inch = 1ft etc

  • @jaleneagle7600
    @jaleneagle7600 5 ปีที่แล้ว +95

    Hoodie so in the building man

  • @ToniMazzotti
    @ToniMazzotti ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Sexagesimal second have 6.000 years. To discuss the seconds and the measurement of time and space based on the rounded seconds for the Hertz, before, we need to understand the sexagesimais origins of the second. Each turn of the clock has 43,200 slices, or seconds. And the number 60 is not a random choice. 60 is the smallest number with the largest number of connections: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 12, 15, 20, 30 and 60. We don't invent mathematics, we just discover the relationships between the quantities, and give them names. That's why I reaffirm that to understand the relationship between the number 432 and the sexagesimal mandala of 60, we need to understand its origins in mathematics, geometry and cosmology.

  • @cappocutz3872
    @cappocutz3872 5 ปีที่แล้ว +57

    Who else here from so’s video

  • @H0lysignz
    @H0lysignz 5 ปีที่แล้ว +89

    Spiritual so in the building

    • @the-engneer
      @the-engneer 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad to know you take advice from a guy who stares at the sun

  • @davidberndt6275
    @davidberndt6275 5 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    I like A432 Hz because its not standard ( its part of my Oppositional defiant disorder....) ;-)

    • @archiereece8321
      @archiereece8321 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      whatever is pleasing to the ear..what did Eddie Van Halen tune to? i heard he wasnt that particular,,as long as the guitar was in tune with itself

  • @newboyzinthehouse
    @newboyzinthehouse 5 ปีที่แล้ว +222

    Spiritual So in the buildin

    • @amf2108
      @amf2108 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      His Cookie661 HEEEEEE

    • @cj600cj2
      @cj600cj2 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      His Cookie661 just saw video on his 2nd

    • @Treezy_205
      @Treezy_205 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dats why I’m here😂

    • @ytsquad7791
      @ytsquad7791 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Oh yuh

    • @miymiy1086
      @miymiy1086 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yupp

  • @DemonlabZ
    @DemonlabZ 5 ปีที่แล้ว +143

    If you here cause of so like this lol

  • @keithfranklin7489
    @keithfranklin7489 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    432 is so much easier and natural for me to sing to , also 432 is very calming , I put it on before bed and during work commute traffic and within minutes I am calm relaxed and happy

  • @goateli7091
    @goateli7091 5 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    who else here from spiritual So

  • @Jiwpgakis
    @Jiwpgakis 7 ปีที่แล้ว +332

    When I play Slayer I tune my piano to 666

    • @Jiwpgakis
      @Jiwpgakis 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      the diabolical tuning of another dimension!

    • @l0wbtry
      @l0wbtry 7 ปีที่แล้ว +44

      When I have sex I tune my "D" to 69

    • @pabloessgalhardo5317
      @pabloessgalhardo5317 7 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      that is not a good idea unless you are using a toy piano. you should play slayer on two pianos, one for each hand and each foot and tune them to A 333 hz

    • @susanclark6437
      @susanclark6437 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Haha

    • @tromed2
      @tromed2 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Who plays Slayer on a piano?

  • @marcstoneslade
    @marcstoneslade 7 ปีที่แล้ว +80

    Rick, I love your videos and I was wondering if you could make a video explaining George Russell's lydian chromatic concept and its application in jazz composition. Thank you.

    • @pwhi2251
      @pwhi2251 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      +16664

  • @AimeeNolte
    @AimeeNolte 7 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    I love this. Great video, Rick!

  • @robertzeurunkl8401
    @robertzeurunkl8401 4 ปีที่แล้ว +100

    I've listened to comparisons of the two (432 and 440), and for some reason the 432 does sound more calm and relaxing to me. I think it might just be because it's a slightly lower tone, thus sounds more mellow when set beside a 440 sample. Throughout school, I was a trumpet player, and we always tuned *A* to 440. We had a tuning machine that you would stand in front of and play an A, and it had little dials on it that would "freeze" when the note was just right - very much like the record player strobe light tuner on a turntable. In fact, it was the same color. But when put side by side, I do like the 432 better - again, I think, because it's just a slightly lower tone giving it a more "bass" sound.

    • @rlopezflute
      @rlopezflute 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      I think it's because it's a natural set of frequencies when you can equally divide 12 from 432 (36). But when you do 440/12, it's an uneven calculation. I'd love to get my hands on an old flute that is actually tuned to 432. Some European orchestras actually do have recordings of Haydn & other classical symphonies on period instruments in 432 or 435 tuning.

    • @missyhilary8905
      @missyhilary8905 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@rlopezflute I know there were so many thousand musicians who were trying to oppose a 440. I seem to remember middle C being tune to a 432 through the 80s. Then, it seem to me that C was changing into C sharp. Little by little by little, Noticed a 440 becoming more and more prevalent.

    • @rlopezflute
      @rlopezflute 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@missyhilary8905 ​ @Missy and Hilary Sisters it's weird, some orchestras here in the US even tune to 441. My piccolo & alto flutes are tuned to 442 because they were made in Germany & Japan, which tune their instruments higher. I have to pull the headjoints out more in ensemble, but not as much when I'm playing alone. I kind of prefer 442 to 440 because the airs comes out a little easier.

    • @kidsvideos3886
      @kidsvideos3886 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      U are right! I feel the same 👍🏻

    • @Lascarnn
      @Lascarnn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      It's exactly that, sounds warmer because it is lower. If you'll compare A 432 with for example A 420 - then A 420 will be warmer... And we can go on like this. No magic here :)

  • @paulcrepeau7488
    @paulcrepeau7488 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The 19th-Century composer Giuseppe Verdi reportedly liked 432-Hz tuning because his opera singers’ voices lasted a lot longer. Nothing mystical about that. 1/3 of 1/2 of a step lower than 440 Hz seems barely noticeable to the average ear, but I guess that somebody who pushes their vocal ability to its limits for a good length of time would consider it a gift. 👂🏼🎹

  • @CrossbeatsMusicProduction
    @CrossbeatsMusicProduction 7 ปีที่แล้ว +70

    couldn't help but laugh about resampling all of your audio collection!

  • @FUFUWO
    @FUFUWO 7 ปีที่แล้ว +85

    I don't know about y'all, but I tune everything to 420hz :)

    • @FernieCanto
      @FernieCanto 7 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      B L A Z E I T
      L
      A
      Z
      E
      I
      T

    • @Soothing432
      @Soothing432 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      417 is better bro

    • @missyhilary8905
      @missyhilary8905 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      What does that do for you?

    • @FUFUWO
      @FUFUWO 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@missyhilary8905 gets you high 😎

  • @DaBoyLeroyLive
    @DaBoyLeroyLive 5 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    Spiritual so sent me here

  • @dimun3130
    @dimun3130 5 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    RIP X🕊
    Who came after So?

  • @thechrishouse
    @thechrishouse 5 ปีที่แล้ว +78

    SoLLUMINATI is blowing up this comment section like crazy!
    STAY WOKE!

    • @20MEANS
      @20MEANS 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Chris House STFU.

    • @the-engneer
      @the-engneer 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That guy is a narcissistic imbecile who sits on his lawn drawing in coloring books with crayons, and stares at the sun

    • @asphyxia2243
      @asphyxia2243 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      20Means Speaks NoFap! 🔥🔥

  • @michaelwallace4298
    @michaelwallace4298 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Just saw this - some 6 years later. Brilliant! What the people talking about a few cents either way don't seem to grasp is that music is not a single note, it is the resonance of harmonics. Shape of the room, even the moisture in the air can subtlety alter this. Let's tune the room, not the minutia! Go Rick!

  • @WhiteOakAmps
    @WhiteOakAmps 7 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    Dear sir, this standardization issue is a bit of a "red herring" in that it supposes that the frequency that A is mapped to is really important, but as you point out for centuries (perhaps millennia) to exactly map a master tuning frequency to 440 Hz would have been impossible without modern science. So how did they tune at all? For guitarists this an important point and leads us to the 6th, and the difference between natural tuning and equal temperament and Das wohltemperierte Klavier (The well-tempered Clavier) by Bach and the differences in the fractions that make up Natural tuning (for instance tuning a guitar or piano to an open chord such as G Major or E Major versus Standard tuning. When tuned to the single Major Chord, as one goes around the Circle of Fifths, the 6ths begin to detune due to the fractions used in relation to the key center. Meanwhile in Standard or Equal Temperament, the division between half-steps is constant, and thus as one goes around the Circle of Fifths (no matter what key one is in), the "out-of-tuneness" is spread across all semitones as opposed to being solely centered on the 6th. If I am not mistaken, this also is the source of differences in notation on enharmonic notes, and the use of sharps when ascending and flats when descending for historical purposes. And finally, it took the three strings of a harpsichord or piano to really center in on equal temperament. Electronically, due to the fact that sine waves produced by electricity do not have inherent overtone artifacts unless they are deliberately designed in, we can have any mapping we desire, but it won't sound "as real" until the proper odd and even harmonics are added. Just my two cents. Great video

    • @garyrahn2172
      @garyrahn2172 5 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      Dude, that's like at least 3 cents.

    • @missyhilary8905
      @missyhilary8905 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      A very succinct reply.

    • @ESPspiderXIII
      @ESPspiderXIII 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      This would explain as to why my open chord tuned guitars sound better tuned to A332 vs Standard tuned; then I just stick to the 'norm'.

  • @timnewman1172
    @timnewman1172 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    I like to approximate 432 on acoustic guitar for a few reasons, mainly string tension on "long scale"(25.5") instruments. Tuning down a full half-step seems just a bit too flat, 432 just seems warmer to my ears...

    • @ThePhreakass
      @ThePhreakass 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It's okay to be tone deaf

    • @jamesworley9888
      @jamesworley9888 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ThePhreakass Maybe what you call tone deaf is actually the better music but we've listened to 440 for so long we think it's vice versa. Just a thought, no use in acting like we have all the answers because the world would be perfect if we did. If you don't like 432 hz that's fine but there's no use in being evangelical about something we only know on the surface level.

  • @hmsdefiant
    @hmsdefiant 2 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    432 is much better for meditation music and songwriting, I used to be sceptical but I have done a LOT of comparison and I don't think it's just a placebo and there could have been a conspiracy. I think Rick is being a bit glib with his dismissal here.

    • @lilaccilla
      @lilaccilla ปีที่แล้ว

      agree

    • @booshwireless
      @booshwireless ปีที่แล้ว

      Did you compare other frequencies besides 432. Or did you just test 440 vs 432?

  • @1allstarman
    @1allstarman 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What kills the 432 havinmg any sort of " spiritua;l " effect on a guitar is the equal temperment . You can adjust the fundamental tuning , however it still aint right !

  • @kevnar
    @kevnar 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Even if water reacts differently to 432 hz, tuning music down to that frequency will only effect water (or anything else) when that particular octave of A is played. Music changes chords, pitch, and tones constantly. Unless the entire song is just one long A note, it's not really going to realign your chakra or whatever.

    • @spacercake
      @spacercake 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      We are 60% water

    • @ilcubo32
      @ilcubo32 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@spacercake What about many types of protein in our body? What about DNA and RNA?

    • @monty3322
      @monty3322 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Good point. Not many songs out there that only use A . If a person wanted to try vibration or resonance therapy, maybe a difference, who knows?

    • @GodPorter144
      @GodPorter144 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@spacercake I thought I was bugging🤣 the whole point is if it can do that to water it can do worse to us

    • @cheery-hex
      @cheery-hex 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      In reference to your last words... you don't know that

  • @redshoe6833
    @redshoe6833 5 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    I agree with Lennon. I moved to 432 Hz just because it seems a little richer in tone and seems to make slight intonation problems less noticeable. It's no big deal to me because all my gigs are solo. I keep a Strat tuned to 440 Hz, just in case you want to jam.

  • @themightychabunga2441
    @themightychabunga2441 7 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I like the Oldsmobile 442.

  • @yezrtn
    @yezrtn 5 ปีที่แล้ว +59

    Spiritual so in the building 🧘🏾‍♂️

    • @the-engneer
      @the-engneer 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      That guy is a narcissistic imbecile who sits on his lawn drawing in coloring books with crayons, and stares at the sun

  • @Aethertopia369
    @Aethertopia369 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I think cymatic experiments can offer some real insights into which frequencies are more in harmony with the nature of this realm. I first discovered cymatics by accident. Some time ago, I was painting in my studio listening to music, and I used my paint brush and turpentine metal cup to drum along to the music. Lo and behold, I started to see complex and perfect, geometric shapes appear in the turpentine within the cup! The geometry literally emerged from the waves in the liquid! Depending on how hard I hit the metal cup with my brush, different shapes would emerge in the liquid! Sometimes nothing, and sometimes perfect geometries in the circular metal cup! My mind was blown. Later, I found out and understood it to be what's known as cymatics. The vibrations that I was creating, by hitting the side of the tin, transferred to shapes in the turpentine liquid. Sometimes six pointed geometry, sometimes 12 pointed would appear, etc. And sometimes it looked to be in 3D. It would all happen in a flash. There was a certain bounce to the metal cup, which I think facilitated this wave creation and circular geometry. If you don't know, look into cymatics, frequencies, wave forms, etc. This stuff is serious.

  • @oliverhillz408
    @oliverhillz408 5 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Spiritual so inna building

  • @420SATIVASFACTION
    @420SATIVASFACTION 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ancient civilizations tuned to what they liked, so even before seconds, 432 could have been preferred -
    it was standard for Verdi and shamanic/healing instruments use 432 too!

  • @j.c.spires398
    @j.c.spires398 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    I had never heard of 432 vs 440 until somebody I hardly knew randomly sent me a video addressing it a year ago. It was an interesting video. A little bit new agey but interesting enough that I decided to try it. Lo and behold when I started singing it did seem like some ethereal static that I had subconsciously always fought against had been removed!
    Last month I did my first gig in a while and definitely asked the band to all tune at 432 Hz.
    Of course my mind was occupied with all the details of doing a show so I really forgot completely all about the fact that we had tuned down at 432. No question for the whole night I was kind of marveling over the way my vocals sat so comfortably on top of the mix!? That doesn’t happen a lot. Also the instruments were never fighting against each other. Each instrument seemed to have comfortable space. And we were not too loud. We were not un-loud But we were not too loud. I could see people still able to converse with each other even though we were playing at a decent volume. It was a few days before it occurred to me that it might’ve had something to do with us performing at 432HZ. I know there’s lots of snarkiness and mockers and scoffers around this idea. Lol… And may be 440 is/was more appropriate for our beloved rock ‘n’ roll era that was aggressive and harsh from the get-go. But as for me I love playing and singing at 432. My two cents! Great TH-cam channel Rick thank you!

    • @andersbarfodsvaneskolan9378
      @andersbarfodsvaneskolan9378 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Interesting post. I find that 440Hz- 442Hz makes the notes in the 12-TET scale sit rather high in resonance in the throat.. Move pitch down to 432Hz and most notes just seem to hover at my voices relaxed state.. And singing high in my upper middle register C4 to E4 becomes much more comftable.. In fact the passaggio E4 might be the most tricky note for my voice.. Move pitch down to 431Hz that E4 becomes so much easier to find the balance..

    • @esterhammerfic
      @esterhammerfic ปีที่แล้ว

      It sounds like your voice benefits from a lower tuning. But my guess is that it's not necessarily A=432. The same relaxation would probably come from tuning to A=434 or A=431. If it works for you though, go with it.

    • @andersbarfodsvaneskolan9378
      @andersbarfodsvaneskolan9378 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@esterhammerfic
      I tried with many tunings.. I tried A4=430Hz and I find it a little too low when I hit my lower chest register.. The sweet-spot for my voice is around 434Hz..

  • @fitzdraco
    @fitzdraco 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    There's also a ton of 70s songs that seem to be tuned to A=whatever the Bass player says it is, and it winds up between A=420 and A=448. Then you also have that huge collection of rock bands that use an Eb tuning, which I'm pretty sure is A=415.30. It might not matter though since you could still play a note at 440hz. And the guys who care about this really only care about being pedantic about frequencies.
    If you want to get really weird you can look into all of those metal bans that tune to C standard. That would be A=261.63. That has to be better frequencies.
    Also whatever the hell AC/DC spent that part of their career tuning to.

    • @NorbertNagyNorc
      @NorbertNagyNorc 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Fitz, I love your first notion of A=whatever the bass player says it is.
      However, after that you seem to mix up the concept of transposing instruments, alternate tunings and reference pitches. Miles would read and call the base note on his trumpet a C, which actually sounds Bb in concert pitch (transposing instruments). SRV tuned to Eb, but would not call that E - alternate tuning.

  • @freezatron
    @freezatron 7 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    haha I love the way you couldn't keep a straight face when mentioning chrystal healing energies and the frequencies of the universe woo woo :D :D :D

  • @scarletbegonias2359
    @scarletbegonias2359 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Love the names of your kids, you are all in and we are all better for it.

  • @sdb6757
    @sdb6757 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I’ve found it a bit easier to sing when tuned 432.

  • @immanuelpatten8386
    @immanuelpatten8386 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Cycles per second weren't specifically measured until the year 1834 when the Savart Wheel and the Tonometer where invented, but because the metric system came out in 1795, music was accurate; even more so, relatively, than most people today with tuners. They knew, then, the note range for any given length of tube for a horn or a pipe organ to get different notes for transposition. The earliest development known for the metric system is from John Wilkins.
    In 1668, he proposed a coordinated system of units of measure for length, area, volume, and mass. This means that people knew what they were tuning and building their instruments to for more than half of the Baroque Era and all of the Classical Era. Things are generally accepted before they become standardized, but even if instrument makers didn't know the Hertz value, the metric system is defined as being derived from nature.
    So, like I've explained, instrument makers, then, knew the acoustical output of instruments based on the shapes and sizes of natural objects through simple observation. They might not have had tuners, but Europeans knew how to trace and compare lengths precisely since before they came out of caves. Perception is rooted in nature and the observation of it consciously.
    This is why your son sang a 33 and a third cent wide quarter tone. Let me explain; he had to hear when one note range started and the other one ended. 448 Hz tuning actually sounds 1/3 of a note flat, 440 Hz sounds 1/3 of a note sharp, and 432 Hz, being 40 octaves lower than the calibration of primary and secondary visual colors within a 12 tone system, sound balanced.
    Stay with me, now. He sang the note up past 448 Hz tuning and touched 456 Hz tuning (the next note up from 432 Hz) and in doing so, he then brought it down to where the note would sound so flat that it couldn't be confused with being the same note compare to the commercial standard of tuning. Take a look at this repeating pattern rooted in the conscious awareness of the complete range of any "A" (Orange) that is 40 octaves lower than the THz range of the visible colors Red through Yellow:
    •flat = 400 Hz = Ab = Raspberry-Red
    +8 Hz
    •in-tune = 408 Hz = Ab = Red
    +8 Hz
    •sharp = 416 Hz =Ab = Orange-Red
    + 8 Hz
    •flat = 424 Hz = A = Red-Orange
    +8 Hz
    •in-tune = 432 Hz = A = Orange
    +8 Hz
    •sharp = 440 Hz = A = Yellow-Orange
    +8 Hz
    •flat = 448 Hz = A# = Orange-Yellow
    +8 Hz
    •in-tune = 456 Hz = A# = Yellow
    +8 Hz
    •sharp = 464 Hz = A# = Lime-Yellow
    We are dealing with microtones, here, but compared to the World War tuning, in-tune is flat; flat is sharp (as the next note down); and, (as sharp as any note can be before it is in the next range of color) is in-tune.
    Understanding this will have you realize that 440 Hz came about to make music sound sharp. It is better to sound sharp than out of tune, but that is just 440 Hz, not 442 Hz or 445 Hz.
    I hope that this explains some of the weird theories that claim that 432 Hz can expand your awareness. It sure could help you to understand and develop perfect pitch. Thank you for taking the time to read all of this.

  • @jrsmoots
    @jrsmoots 7 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    You won't convince all the new age nuts with facts, man!

    • @colinwright4139
      @colinwright4139 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Tell me about it, but for some reason, I can't stop being triggered by the fruitcakes.

    •  4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Pythagoras has NOTHING to do with New Age, idiots!

    • @rodrigofriend5759
      @rodrigofriend5759 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @ please go listen to some Pythagorean tuned music, and I don't mean the ambient music, I mean music with somewhat complex harmony, it sounds like utter crap, no music where the ratio of the major third is 81/64 will sound good

    • @poodle3507
      @poodle3507 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @ Pythagoras has nothing to do with 432hz

  • @lexistreet
    @lexistreet 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    432 is the best!! Stephen Dawson does Katie Perry’s teenage dream in 432 and it takes it to the next level

  • @caspermaster-com
    @caspermaster-com 7 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    I tune everything to 1 then makes the strings 432 times shorter.
    cuz oneness is the ultimate truth

    • @OsvaldoBayerista
      @OsvaldoBayerista 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      I'm 4 years later, but i love this comment, lmao.

  • @davu9027
    @davu9027 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A=435hz will always be my favourite. It all comes alive

  • @jerseydeviljohnnyfeds9347
    @jerseydeviljohnnyfeds9347 5 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    FINALLY SOME INTELLIGENT TRUTH ABOUT THIS ARGUMENT!

  • @christopherjakela4097
    @christopherjakela4097 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    440hz throws off our vibration and disconnects us from source. Hence why they made it the standard in 1932. Just another example of how everything in life today is backwards from how it was meant to be.

  • @killavenger
    @killavenger 7 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    By the way how does Dylan react to microtonal music? And also it would be interesting to hear your opinion on microtonal music composers, thanks!

    • @ivyssauro123
      @ivyssauro123 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      killavenger he has said that he hears a kind of mixture of two tones, meaning A and A# simultaneously when hearing a sharper A, each note getting more noticeable the closer to the actual pitch they hold they are.

  • @PeterLaman
    @PeterLaman 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This whole discussion doesn't make sense at all. The main argument 432 Hz believers use is that this frequency resonates with... well, they mention different things, but basically it comes down resonating with a certain thing and 440 Hz doesn't. You see? That's all they got.
    So nice. So now we play a tune in C# major that has no alterations in it at all, but with our instruments nicely tuned using A=432 Hz. However, in C# major, there won't be an A in the tune. No 440 Hz A, but no 432 Hz A either. It won't resonate with the universe, nor with the Egyptian pyramids, nor with with any of the other things brought up. Even if they play a piece in A, will they only play A's? Wow, that would make interesting music, wouldn't it?
    And, what kind of tuning will they use to make it resonate with the green aliens living on Mars?
    Did I mention the nazis? Didn't they dictate A to be 440 Hz, so they could control the people's minds? Yes, there are people who claim this. Godwin's law is always lurking around the corner to fabricate a point, whenever there are no valid arguments.
    This whole 432 Hz thing is just sheer nonsense, made up by people who think they'll intellectually stand out by disagreeing with the majority. In fact, it only makes them look stupid.

    • @MrAnders1976
      @MrAnders1976 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      If you play in C#-major with A4=432Hz using 12-TET you are actually playing the indian chant wovel OM at C#=136.1Hz. So eventhough playing in C#-major and not A of akey that utilize A4=432Hz you are still very much closer to a relaxed natural resonance of the human voice.

  • @inoahlot757
    @inoahlot757 5 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    luminati gang spiritual So in the building Sungazing So in the building

  • @Gary_Texan_USA
    @Gary_Texan_USA ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Back in my days as a violin artiste , we would canvass our contemporaries if A-440 or, A-444 was better. Can you believe that?

  • @MrAnders1976
    @MrAnders1976 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Notes A3=216Hz (-31.77 cents) and G#3=204Hz (-30.7 cents),, just lay completely natural to my voice.. The ~ 30 cents lift from ~432Hz to 440Hz for A4 is not natural for my voice... MY voice relaxed resonance is around the tuning of A4 at 432Hz.. Singing high notes comes very natural when the guitar is tunes at 432Hz vs 440Hz.. The passaggio is shifted too high at 440Hz
    Infact the highest pitch for my voice if I lay of a lot of weight (early transition) is ~438Hz (~8 cents). A4=440Hz is very difficult to find the balance in the throat.. In my world 440Hz excludes a lot of voices in music.. The previous european pitch at 435Hz is a better comprimise between a high (445Hz) and low pitch (425Hz).
    A4=424-425Hz would be close to Mozats and Händels pitch as they used a forks at A4=421.6 and 422.5Hz but they were probably using a more "pure" tuning system like meantone or just intonation which was much more common which sets the A (major six. or La) note flatter relative to 12-TET in the C major scale. I think it was a piano tuning company from late 1800s that had their pianos tuned in Meantone at 433.5Hz for A4 and with 12-TET is was A4=436Hz. A difference of ~10 cents.
    A tenor hitting the high notes to Händels halleluja to a piano tuned to 425Hz would be easy, nice and full.. At modern A4=442-443Hz which many like to tune their classical instruments at .. The tenor sounds bad... It is only the spinto tenors (very few individuals) that would sing the high part with ease...
    We got it all wrong,, The previous pitch at 435Hz is as high the note of A4 should have gone to get the right classical division of fachs..
    This is a fact...440Hz is a very "unnatural" singing pitch if I may use that word.

    • @havokmusicinc
      @havokmusicinc 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      dansk björn 440 is unnatural to your body, and it is to mine as well - but my body is more comfortable around 450. The tiny bit of extra sharpness really helps me maintain consitant intonation. Conversely, I have an old bass trumpet that doesn't tune any higher than 430 - and I prefer to play it around 425. Every body and every instrument is different, and you gotta do what works best for you and for your equipment!

    • @MrAnders1976
      @MrAnders1976 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      424-425/449-450hz as a nice spot i completely can relate to. it is another nice area together with the 432/457hz area. what is your vocal fach when singing..
      the weirdest pitch area for my voice is 439-445hz. not low enough and not high enough

  • @jean-xavierbardant1082
    @jean-xavierbardant1082 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Western music in equal temperament uses 12 different frequencies, only one of which is a multiple of the frequency of A : the A itself.
    A piece in Eb major tuned at 432Hz will contain no A at all, so no instance of a note vibrating at that 432Hz frequency.
    This should be enough to debunk the 432 Hz bullshit.

  • @paulfalke6227
    @paulfalke6227 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The difference of 440Hz to 432Hz is 1.8 percent. If you play a cheap acoustiv guitar for some time, you will start at 440Hz and end at 432Hz. The BIG benefit of the cheap guitar: you get all cosmic tunes between 440Hz and 432Hz. Doing this, you may find the secret frequency of the universe!

    • @andreh.dupuis8475
      @andreh.dupuis8475 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      since music frequencies are logarithmic you cannot compare them in prtcentage which is linear, for A4 at 432 vs 440 it is approximately 1/3 of a half tone, that 1/3 of a half tone increases in percentage as go move to higher frequencies 😊

  • @fuzzcityrecords432
    @fuzzcityrecords432 ปีที่แล้ว

    While Hertz was only measured starting in the early 1800s, it's important to remember that it's just a measuring tool, just like radiocarbon dating would be used to determine the age of an object containing organic material. Instruments and tuning practices predating the Hertz measurement have been retroactively found to be A=432Hz, for instance, there were tuning forks found that corresponded with the frequency, or the simple fact that people swore by Pythagorean 5ths for tuning (who is also the person responsible for the monochord, which was historically in tune with 432Hz). I see people make this same moot point all the time, but it's a pretty obvious, hard-to-miss observation if you think about it.

  • @missyhilary8905
    @missyhilary8905 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    A 432 for me. Not for spiritual reasons, but I do believe that it is the most natural of the three frequencies mentioned. I have perfect pitch, and I do notice that birds seem to sing in a 432. Humans naturally speak and a 432.

  • @alexcaminiti
    @alexcaminiti 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Black Hole Sun is A455 and it turned out pretty well. People seem to like it.

  • @marthadelcastillo2551
    @marthadelcastillo2551 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I think I have a negative effect to 440. Life somebody"ruffling my feathers".You made much more clear as to get people to understand these concepts. Physics was one of my favorite subjects in highschool but still how does this translate to practice, real life,how can I choose to tune my guitar to 432Hz?

  • @gcensing6351
    @gcensing6351 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My thoughts; no matter what science and history says about it, if you can hear and appreciate the difference, it makes a difference!

  • @suluguitar9579
    @suluguitar9579 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I heard years ago that 440a was made so we would be forced into a more discordant type vibration overall concerning the music. Just something I'd heard in past, kind of like fluoride and other things people claim were introduced to not help us. I'm sure others have heard the same thing. Rick I dig your videos, all of them! 🎸

    • @DerHammerSpricht
      @DerHammerSpricht ปีที่แล้ว

      We have the Rockefellers to thank for enforcing 440 Hz as standard. They also gave us the brutal American public school system and helped fund the rise of the Third Reich. Go figure.

    • @hey.3249
      @hey.3249 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hitler did this in his country

  • @hubertvancalenbergh9022
    @hubertvancalenbergh9022 7 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    How can we disagree with an authority of Dylan's calibre!

  • @retardedproducer4949
    @retardedproducer4949 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    theres nothing special about the second, or a number based on the second

  • @theblackpacomurder
    @theblackpacomurder 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I found 432hz more enjoyable i can actually Feel the difference, i Feel kinda Bad when Rick mocks about chakras and spiritual energy But hey ,this channel is about music so i can understand why he is making fun. It doesnt really matters

  • @BillLarkinmusic
    @BillLarkinmusic 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very good thank you !! I learned a bit about this subject playing with a french accordianist that had an old accordian instrument tuned in this way, A =435; You surely put more light on the subject with a few things i didn't know. Thank you Rick for the cool vids!!

  • @llBadSremmll
    @llBadSremmll 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Who came from solluminati 🤦🏾‍♂️🤣

  • @webz3589
    @webz3589 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    In terms of this subject i like 432hz i don't believe in the whole new age spiritual crap but it's certainly pleasant on the ears,though that's just because its tuned lower so its naturally mellowed not because its the frequency of mother earth or any of that stuff

  • @rlopezflute
    @rlopezflute 3 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    I have a theory on these 2 tuning systems. I think if our tuning system had been in 432, the world would be a better place... it's a fascinating "what-if" thought that i often have, although it's impossible. It's still fun to hear comparisons. There's something different about 432 tuning that draws you in. And this is coming from someone who has perfect pitch in 440. It's taken a while to get used to 432.

    • @vectragt2310
      @vectragt2310 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      One day has 86400 seconds... 432/864...
      That´s in line / sync with everything - the whole cosmos.
      That is why sensitive people feel that. But in our dumbed down society it´s all just nuts...
      Mankind is ignorant like...

    • @rlopezflute
      @rlopezflute ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@vectragt2310oh wow, I didn't know about the seconds of rhe day. I do know that 432/12 = 36, but what is interesting is 440/12 =36.666 🧐 No wonder so many musicians have anxiety &/or are depressed! And that includes myself. If we're constantly exposed to unequal frequencies, it's doing something to us physically & emotionally. I wish more research was done on this.

    • @vectragt2310
      @vectragt2310 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@rlopezflute
      432/8 = physical
      432/9 = spiritual / Ether side
      And yes, 440 was put in place on purpose...
      Also, no further investigation needs to be done if people learn to follow their intuiton and heart/earth.

    • @RoderickVoordouw
      @RoderickVoordouw ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@vectragt2310 One day has 85.984,091 seconds, we just rounded it down to 24 hours. Also, a day is not the same in the whole cosmos, only our Earth day is roughly 24 hours. Stop trying to be smart as if 432Hz is in tune with the universe or something, it isn't even in tune by your own standards.

    • @vectragt2310
      @vectragt2310 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@RoderickVoordouw
      Well, then I made an incorrect statement.
      In line with earth and its frequency, as we ARE ON EARTH. And with 440 you are out of sync and it is not coincidence this became western standard.
      There won´t be a direct effect from listening to 432, but over time when it would be all over the radio, etc. DNA and concioussness would change. As you surely know DNA is dynamic.
      So stop trying to tell bs...

  • @IsaacCarrizal
    @IsaacCarrizal 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I like your videos (even though they often go over my head and make me cry like an infant at my own ineptitude, leaving me wanting to: 432 part quit to 440 part get on my instrument).
    This was so informative and cheeky at the same time. It made a potentially dry subject fun to watch. This has been my favorite so far!

  • @SG-zp5uy
    @SG-zp5uy ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A = 432 Hz resonates with Schuman Resonance of the earth, which is Earth's heartbeat at 8 Hz. In the scale the C note lands on 8 Hz in the lowest octave. So the idea is it's supposed to be at a natural flowing vibration with the universe.

  • @TomWinspear
    @TomWinspear 7 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    This discussion pops up a lot!The long list of pseudocience/spirituality stuff you reeled off makes me laugh for sure haha. It's clear there can't be a superior system in regards to anything like that, because resonances of physical bodies will never be consistent. Also, any significance of the number 432 is entirely arbitrary like you explained. Besides, that's just one single frequency of one single note whilst music contains the full spectrum!When people push such reasons in support of 432, they tend to show a fundamental misunderstanding of how sound works - throwing around words like resonance, harmonics, overtones, without realising that all these things remain consistent, just slightly lower. Their points could be used to argue for tuning systems like Just Intonation vs 12EDO, but 12EDO vs 12EDO slightly lower is really irrelevant. Tune to whatever :) As a rule of thumb lower will sound a bit calmer for sure. I liked Jacob Colliers modulation from 440 to 432 as it displays that effect very well.

  • @alandalaku719
    @alandalaku719 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A=440Hz works PERFECTLY for me.

  • @chadvitale1567
    @chadvitale1567 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I've just stumbled upon something truley interesting. People believed that 432hz was resonant with 8hz (which was considered the harmonic resonance of the earth) ... until.. we developed fine instruments to determin it was really 7.83 which would make the A frequency 430.65. I didn't care to much about all the nonsense until i actually listened to a piece of music in 430.65 and it actually created this unusual humming sensation in my body. The closest thing i can descride it as, is the feeling i would get if i smoked a hit off of a joint. Not to get too hippy-like but it really felt like love was pumping through my body. But when i went back to 440hz music, it seemed to slightly intensify a slight headache i had from earlier in the day. Weird stuff.

  • @hoovesandpawsanimalrescue
    @hoovesandpawsanimalrescue ปีที่แล้ว

    Hopefully nobody is blaming their own demise on tuning...truth is: You can be ANYTHING you want to be in spite of any "conspiracy".

  • @Nulzy
    @Nulzy 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Spiry🙏🏾 So in the buildin

  • @michaelgarrett2298
    @michaelgarrett2298 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I had a guitar church gig with a piano player. The pastor previously told the piano player that he a very nice Yamaha electric keyboard on sight so no need to bring your gear. We showed up 30mins prior for a quick sound check. Unfortunately they had a prayer service going on before main service started. I was told to just set up my amp and guitar so we could immediately play after prayer. Long story short. I was in 440 and that keyboard was in who knows what. Lol, It was a mess and the piano player couldn't figer out how to change the pitch nor did we have time to stop mid song. I had to eventually stop playing while everyone was looking at me crazy. The moral of this story is bring your own gear because you never know what might happen.

  • @PetrieRobert
    @PetrieRobert 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I would add that the lovely people who insist on A=432, have no problem with the unnatural abomination that is equal temperament.

  • @PotBotorg
    @PotBotorg 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    From my deep study of physic and ancient knowledge what we might call "SOUNDS BETTER I LIKE IT" is most certainly related to non destructive interference where the sound oscillations vibrate non destructive are phase conjugate and imbend n each vibration recursively. This is occurring where whatever you want to call tuning vibrates without resistance with the Shuman harmonic of the planet earth and is also divisible with planks distance. It the musical keysignature of the universe around. 618 x 10 to the negative 33 centimeters ie the smallest oscillation where the 11th dimension breaks down and becomes a compreshional wave.. but I like 432.;)

  • @david.cutipa
    @david.cutipa 7 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Coming soon "SOUNDING OFF with Dylan, Lennon and Layla" :)

    • @Blizite
      @Blizite 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      That would be interesting.

  • @AndyA1234
    @AndyA1234 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The A 432 hertz argument, where it has attained some mystical and/or cosmic significance, is nonsense and here's why. At some point in history we decided to measure the passage of time more accurately and various timepieces were developed. A standard unit of time had to be decided upon. The reason we have divided the day into 24 hours, with 60 seconds in each of the 60 minutes that make up each hour, is purely due to the fact that these numbers are highly divisible. 24 is divisible by 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 and 12 whereas 60 is divisible by 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 12, 15, 20 and 30. Thus in this system it was easy to use fractions of an hour or day. For instance, we don't say 0.25 or 0.75 of an hour but 1/4 or 3/4 of an hour, respectively. Therefore the duration of a second, which 1/86400th of a day, is purely as a result of choosing how we divided the day up initially. Suppose we decide to go metric with our time and have 10 hours in a day, with 100 minutes in an hour and 100 seconds in a minute. This would give us 100,000 new seconds (ns) in a day as opposed to 86,400 seconds. The SI unit for a second, which is defined as the time taken for 9,192,631,770 vibrations (transitions between energy states) of caesium 133 atoms. Using our metric seconds the new SI definition would be corrected to 7,842,433,250 vibrations of caesium 133. As a result of this shortening of the second A 432 Hz would now be A 373.248 Hz. In conclusion, the duration of a second is the construct of man when we chose to divide the day into measurable units (i.e. 86,400s/day) . If we had chosen the system as outlined above (i.e. 100,000ns/day) the second would be shorter and therefore so would the cycles per second (hertz) of all of the tunings that are used in music. Simple.

    • @AndyA1234
      @AndyA1234 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      PS. Using this the new definition of a second, 432Hz would have the same pitch equivalence as 500Hz in our existing definition. Try altering your instrument to this and see have relaxing, spiritual, etc., etc. it is. Frequency, amplitude and wavelength is dependant on your measurement system (i.e.. metres and seconds) which are defined by us. As I illustrated different standards and definitions yield different results. If we decided to base the second on how quickly Rick could say "Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious" (the Beato second) and the metre on 4 times the length of his, you know what (the Beato metre), the Beato Hertz would be completely different.
      PPS. I don't know Rick so cannot shed any information of the equivalence of the Beato metre to the metre.

  • @colek.r5280
    @colek.r5280 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Before i discovered that there was a literal debate over this i first noticed when listening to some heavy metal/rock records that they sounded off when i tried to jam along to them and figured it must be like a 'quarter step down' using my ear and ended up with 430hz and have had my floyd rose set up in this particular tuning for a few years now. it sucks having to detune every single (almost) song i wanna jam to haha but you will find that lots of mechanical/electronic/harmonic tones you will hear in your day to day life will resonate with this tuning! i think that must be where the whole 'freq of the universe' stuff came from...

    • @guyincognito320
      @guyincognito320 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      the earth's frequency is supposedly 8 hz, and 432 is divisible by 8 54 times. 5+4 = 9, and 9 +11 = NINE ELEVEN

  • @StevenCharlesJazz
    @StevenCharlesJazz ปีที่แล้ว +1

    After all I've read and heard about this issue, I agree with Rick, if tuning to 432 rocks your boat, do it. But IMHO, it what people play and their sound that takes great precedence over just it's pitch, when listening. Their choice of notes, as well as the relationship to each other, no matter what the pitch one's tuned to, is a greater factor in whether I feel the music is transcendent, calming, healing, or jarring, agitated, even violent. Playing crappy music can't be overcome simply by tuning to 432. And listening to music is so very subjective anyway, takes me back to saying just do what sounds best to you...

  • @DHRGrafix
    @DHRGrafix 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I like singing in A432 for the same reason I like tuning to Eb. It's easier to hit high notes. But it's a hassle tuning back and forth when I play with other people, recordings or TH-cam so I just play in A440 99.9% of the time.

  • @KatjaTgirl
    @KatjaTgirl ปีที่แล้ว

    Let's trow some physics into the mix. Dividing 1 by the Planck time (the shortest time possible calculated from the fundamental constants of the universe) yeilds the Planck frequency. Divide this frequency by 2 to get the same tone 1 octave lower. Do this 135 times an one arrives at 426Hz. This then is the fundamental tuning of the universe. Our year has 365.244 days instead of the ideal 360 so our days and seconds are a little short. Multiplying 432 by 360/365.244 also yields 426Hz. What happens if one uses 426Hz to play and compose music?

  • @VallaMusic
    @VallaMusic 7 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    i was never convinced the 432 Hz was some miracle frequency so i thoroughly enjoyed this video - having said that, i still think the issue of energetic frequency in music is a profound subject - i would argue that the only so-called 'frequency' that truly matters would have to do with the unique character of the music itself

  • @rolexmarcelo3218
    @rolexmarcelo3218 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love the experts! I love A-4-40-32

  • @KenKen-ho4lv
    @KenKen-ho4lv 5 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    WHOS HERE BECAUSE OF SOLLUMINATI STAY WOKE???

  • @0nlytizzy
    @0nlytizzy 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    So in the building

  • @Schlagwerker1988
    @Schlagwerker1988 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Hey Rick,
    I just LOVE 432 and 448 hertz tuning.
    440 pitches sound really aggressive to me in comparison (did a lot of blind testing).
    Coldplay, Melody Gardot and the Vienna Philharmonic have liked it too :)
    Cheers

  • @Inivican
    @Inivican 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Whatever tuning system you use is a matter of preference, just don't go around telling people their music is bad because they didn't invest 4 hours of their life watching a "documentary" that claims your tuning system will cure cancer.

  • @doublecup349
    @doublecup349 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Sun gazing So in the building.

  • @hekeenkl2665
    @hekeenkl2665 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    great ... a huge thank u ... straight to the point without the usual dribble

  • @jameshall7632
    @jameshall7632 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    When i first learned to play guitar, i spent alot of time at the city park, hangin' out with my Yamaha acoustic guitar, a couple doobies, and a pick. Nobody had a tuner, so we went with the player who's guitar sounded the best. I guess you could say that we were tuned to 420.

    • @missyhilary8905
      @missyhilary8905 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for the laugh! I’m sure a 420 was actually fun!

  • @Caff68
    @Caff68 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I like to play Mozart and Beethoven (and Bach, I guess) at a semitone lower than today's concert pitch, and Chopin a semitone higher. BUT there's more to it than that: it's of more importance to use a non-equal tuning, so the different chords have different sounds from each other. I love the way even my Yamaha digital piano comes to life by using Werckmeister - with the C chords sounding so different from the Bs, the Gs sounding so different from the Aflats etc
    A semitone up or down either way doesn't really make that much difference to many people.

  • @rhodigian
    @rhodigian 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    i'd like to hear A432 compared to other alternative tunings, like A420 or something like that.
    My doubt is: is the relaxing effect due to just lowering frequency, or do 432 resonates better than higher and lower tunings?

    • @vectragt2310
      @vectragt2310 ปีที่แล้ว

      A day has 86400 seconds...
      The blind are leading the blind into darkness...

    • @rhodigian
      @rhodigian ปีที่แล้ว

      @@vectragt2310 things are looking up but falling down

  • @jaylenoschin8189
    @jaylenoschin8189 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I prefer A437,554,261,728,816.5