1998-04-18 Prince Naseem Hamed vs Wilfredo Vasquez [WBO Title] HD
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ก.ย. 2017
- Portal www.polskiboks.pl przedstawia najlepszych zawodników boksu zawodowego na świecie
2008-04-18 Manchester ENG
Prince Naseem Hamed ENG vs Wilfredo Vasquez PUR TKO
![[TH] VCT Masters Shanghai Playoffs DAY 6 // G2 vs GEN | 100T vs TH](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/M6jxF80AajI/mqdefault.jpg)
Looked like a casual sparring match for the Prince even though Vasquez was a quality fighter for sure.
Vazquez was WBA champion coming into this fight at 37 props
This was an amazing fight card.
Naseem Vs Wifredo Vasquez
Chris Eubank Vs Carl Thompson
also there was a young Ricky Hatton a young Junior Whitter plus Herbie Hide, Robin Reid, Anthony Farnell and Kelly Oliver.
. ..
naseem hamed is the best legend
Great commentary he gave a lot of interesting information
Marcus waering and Gordon Ramsay in the crowd
1:56, should be point deduction. Far to severe for a warning.
Vázquez estaba muy viejo si este combate hubiera sido diez años antes el boricua venceria
Helen Mirren in the second row, just behind Frank
13:15
16:46
18:23
Naz Vasquez
1 10 9
2 10 9
3 10 8
4 10 9
5 9 10
6 10 8
7 X
Second round could have gone to Vasquez due to the near-knockdown,
Otherwise it was all Prince Hamed until round 5 where it seemed like Naz just took the round off Bc in 6/7 he was dominant going in for the kill.
@D N was ruled a slip
2:34
Worst champion of all time!
Cap
You clearly don't know anything about boxing coming out with a comment like that. Why even bother to reveal your lack of knowledge if it's this extreme. I'd be embarrassed to make comments on any subject i was this ignorant with.
Vasquez was to too way over the hill. Bumed was unable to get away with his foolish maneuvers against Barrera. What a clown with zero real boxing ability and no heart. I really wish that bum had fought the great Salvador Sanchez.. He would have easily suffered a knockout loss.
Prince, what a legend he is.
Not a fan of Hamed by seriously you call Hamed a bum simply because Barrera supposedly exposed him? Well, I have news for you. Hamed is no bum. His loss to Barrera doesn't prove anything but shows that he's a great boxer. Losing is a part of boxing. Getting exposed is a part of boxing. If losing to a legendary boxer like Barrera makes a boxer like Hamed a bum, then how about Barrera who lost to a gate keeper Junior Jones? Or like Pacquiao who loss to journeyman Rustico Torrecampo and school teacher Jeff Horn? Does it makes them a bum, too? You and other critics of Hamed can't see the fucking truth: it takes a Barrera to give Hamed his only defeat, but it doesn't need a Mayweather or Marquez to give Barrera his first loss.
What are you talking about? No heart? He was all about having a tare up. Most exciting fighter ever.
@@raygan1221 Barrera had a great camp and perfect game plan. He fought off the back foot with the intention f a points win. Naz didn’t care about points wins he was in for a tare up and that’s what his fans wanted. I’m the last round against Barrera he was still grinning and swinging. No shame in that loss not like he got knocked out or even hurt. Plus his speech afterwards was the most humble I’ve ever heard from a boxer. He gave no excuses, said the better man won and that’s it.
I think your biased and moreover no nothing about boxing.