I know people in product engineering whose jobs were made into work from home and moved to a location too far to commute. The employer is now telling them to get back in the office for 3 days a week. Many believe this is one dial being used in order to thin the heard without having to offer buyout packages.
This video completely ignores unemployment benefits. A return to the office mandate may very likely qualify as constructive dismissal, entitling you to unemployment benefits (pay) while you search for a new (potentially remote) job. Laws vary by state.
Yes, but that's not what this brief (less than 4 minutes) video is about. It's about whether an employee under these circumstances has a legal cause of action against his/her employer.
@@Milesco Unemployment is a cause of action against the employer. The employer pays the unemployement insurance premiums. Yes it is administered by the state. And yes, it is an integral part termination considerations.
@@singularityphoenixx No, it isn't. A cause of action is part of a lawsuit filed in court, and it would be for something like fraud, breach of contract, wrongful termination, etc. An unemployment insurance claim is just that -- a claim for benefits under a system administered by a government agency.
I know people in product engineering whose jobs were made into work from home and moved to a location too far to commute. The employer is now telling them to get back in the office for 3 days a week. Many believe this is one dial being used in order to thin the heard without having to offer buyout packages.
Gracias por su lectura muy buena lectura bendiciones❤
This video completely ignores unemployment benefits. A return to the office mandate may very likely qualify as constructive dismissal, entitling you to unemployment benefits (pay) while you search for a new (potentially remote) job. Laws vary by state.
Yes, but that's not what this brief (less than 4 minutes) video is about. It's about whether an employee under these circumstances has a legal cause of action against his/her employer.
@@Milesco Unemployment is a cause of action against the employer. The employer pays the unemployement insurance premiums. Yes it is administered by the state. And yes, it is an integral part termination considerations.
@@singularityphoenixx No, it isn't. A cause of action is part of a lawsuit filed in court, and it would be for something like fraud, breach of contract, wrongful termination, etc.
An unemployment insurance claim is just that -- a claim for benefits under a system administered by a government agency.