The Dawn of Creation: The First Two Billion Years
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ก.ย. 2013
- March 4, 2009
Dr. Stephen Beckwith (University of California)
All the great islands of stars in the universe got their start in the first billion years after the beginning of time, the Big Bang. Every deep picture of the sky reveals thousands of these galaxies, each made up of billions of stars like the Sun. Modern instruments like the Hubble Space Telescope have made it possible to look back to a time when the universe looked very different that it does today. Dr. Beckwith (the former director of the Hubble) discusses some of the deepest images of the universe ever taken and shares recent discoveries about the early days of the cosmos. - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
I love astronomy when I'm high.
Thanks SVA for making these lectures available
I feel like you have to be high to get a better grasp of this stuff. Especially if your not trained
Currently high
This is no doubt the best contemporary Astronomy video I have ever seen.
Excellent lecture... exciting, humorous, intelligent. Great with the audience. The opposite of pedantic.. I didn't know what to expect from a institutional V.P. who had not given a talk of this kind in some time... I've seen it go bad. I've found a new favorite!
Dumb lecture to dumbasses who don't think.
At 5:00 "So, despite this story having no real application..." as he then starts farting out about his silly big bang. Keep in mind this idiot is talking about creation. Again, CREATION. The silly big bang didn't create but the book of the bible that starts out with God creating has "no real application" regarding CREATION, his pathetic big bang does somehow.
Stephen, shove this up your ass...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God.
So if you want to pretend to be smart, please give me the laugh by giving your science how creation really happened by natural means. Also, throw in how we got the laws of nature, naturally.
I know that this lecture is a little old by now - but what a fantastic lecturer.
Thank you Dr B for an excellent lecture. Bringing this knowledge to the general public in a very clear and concise way is truly the indication of great teaching skills and I also wish to thank Dr F for hosting this excellent lecture series
could listen to this guy share his knowledge every day, will def be looking out for more of his lectures
At 5:00 "So, despite this story having no real application..." as he then starts farting out about his silly big bang. Keep in mind this idiot is talking about creation. Again, CREATION. The silly big bang didn't create but the book of the bible that starts out with God creating has "no real application" regarding CREATION, his pathetic big bang does somehow.
Stephen, shove this up your ass...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God.
So if you want to pretend to be smart, please give me the laugh by giving your science how creation really happened by natural means. Also, throw in how we got the laws of nature, naturally.
That was by far one of the best presentations I have seen in quite a while. Thank you !!!
At 5:00 "So, despite this story having no real application..." as he then starts farting out about his silly big bang. Keep in mind this idiot is talking about creation. Again, CREATION. The silly big bang didn't create but the book of the bible that starts out with God creating has "no real application" regarding CREATION, his pathetic big bang does somehow.
Stephen, shove this up your ass...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God.
So if you want to pretend to be smart, please give me the laugh by giving your science how creation really happened by natural means. Also, throw in how we got the laws of nature, naturally.
Fantastic lecture! The speaker is the best to convey the message to the general public. Love it!!!!
At 5:00 "So, despite this story having no real application..." as he then starts farting out about his silly big bang. Keep in mind this idiot is talking about creation. Again, CREATION. The silly big bang didn't create but the book of the bible that starts out with God creating has "no real application" regarding CREATION, his pathetic big bang does somehow.
Stephen, shove this up your ass...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God.
So if you want to pretend to be smart, please give me the laugh by giving your science how creation really happened by natural means. Also, throw in how we got the laws of nature, naturally.
Really great lecture. I watch a lot of these type of vids on youtube and I really enjoyed this one with Dr. Beckwith. This is one of the best vids, and great to hear some info about what these space programs are discovering/proving.
He's stupid.
At 5:00 "So, despite this story having no real application..." as he then starts farting out about his silly big bang. Keep in mind this idiot is talking about creation. Again, CREATION. The silly big bang didn't create but the book of the bible that starts out with God creating has "no real application" regarding CREATION, his pathetic big bang does somehow.
Stephen, shove this up your ass...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God.
So if you want to pretend to be smart, please give me the laugh by giving your science how creation really happened by natural means. Also, throw in how we got the laws of nature, naturally.
@@2fast2block How old is the Earth?
@@docemeveritatum8550 here's what a fool writes that thinks they somehow proved me wrong what I wrote with...
"How old is the Earth?"
No, look at yourself. This bozo the clown is serious.
@@2fast2block You're not convincing anyone, and you're kind of upset. If you have the truth you should be happy and confident.
Wonderful lecture, thank you Dr Beckwith.
I love to let my mind try to understand the magnitude of the universe, it makes me feel that although we humans are a grain of sand in a endless beach, our intellect IS what is discovering this wonder !
Loved every second of this. Great science communicator Dr Beckwith. Thank you so much!
At 5:00 "So, despite this story having no real application..." as he then starts farting out about his silly big bang. Keep in mind this idiot is talking about creation. Again, CREATION. The silly big bang didn't create but the book of the bible that starts out with God creating has "no real application" regarding CREATION, his pathetic big bang does somehow.
Stephen, shove this up your ass...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God.
So if you want to pretend to be smart, please give me the laugh by giving your science how creation really happened by natural means. Also, throw in how we got the laws of nature, naturally.
Amazing lecture but also such an amazing audience! Great, intelligent, insightful questions. My best would be on par with that balloon question asked be a kid...
Stupid.
At 5:00 "So, despite this story having no real application..." as he then starts farting out about his silly big bang. Keep in mind this idiot is talking about creation. Again, CREATION. The silly big bang didn't create but the book of the bible that starts out with God creating has "no real application" regarding CREATION, his pathetic big bang does somehow.
Stephen, shove this up your ass...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God.
So if you want to pretend to be smart, please give me the laugh by giving your science how creation really happened by natural means. Also, throw in how we got the laws of nature, naturally.
Fantastic lecture. I sincerely hope that we see more of Dr. Beckwith in the future.
At 5:00 "So, despite this story having no real application..." as he then starts farting out about his silly big bang. Keep in mind this idiot is talking about creation. Again, CREATION. The silly big bang didn't create but the book of the bible that starts out with God creating has "no real application" regarding CREATION, his pathetic big bang does somehow.
Stephen, shove this up your ass...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God.
So if you want to pretend to be smart, please give me the laugh by giving your science how creation really happened by natural means. Also, throw in how we got the laws of nature, naturally.
Who's watching this in 2020 and he mentions the James Webb Space Telescope should be in space in 2013, but it still has not been launched?
Great lecture! Dr. Beckwith is fantastic!
Great lecture really enjoyed it
*Thank you so much! This is extremely interesting, and he is one excellent speaker.*
He's an idiot.
At 5:00 "So, despite this story having no real application..." as he then starts farting out about his silly big bang. Keep in mind this idiot is talking about creation. Again, CREATION. The silly big bang didn't create but the book of the bible that starts out with God creating has "no real application" regarding CREATION, his pathetic big bang does somehow.
Stephen, shove this up your ass...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God.
So if you want to pretend to be smart, please give me the laugh by giving your science how creation really happened by natural means. Also, throw in how we got the laws of nature, naturally.
@@2fast2block the Old Testament genesis is a great fairy tale which was passed down to later generations orally. The tribal elder kept a staff with notches and symbols carved into it that reminded him of past events. He then taught his successor how to read the symbols so that he could then pass the stories on in turn. With the advent of written language the tribal scribes made transcribed copies of the stories as they became too old and worn.
The stories eventually were organized into books that were generally defined by authorship and were also translated as the language evolved. This process continued for thousands of years until the Semitic tribes eventually founded a settled government and scribes were appointed the task of reconciling the various copies into a coherent book by choosing the best interpretation of the often conflicting accounts. Of course each generation placed its own spin on any interpretation required by the changing language usages so that the stories would make sense to the current generation of readers.
Changing political events often caused long delays in the rewriting due to periods of captivity and this also changed the content of the stories. Eventually with the spread of Christianity to Rome the Greek translations were gathered into the first bible of the holy Roman church. Most of the books were edited by the ecumenical council to agree with the current doctrine of the church and government. Many of them were excised completely because they disagreed with current doctrines.
Still the Bible was continued by laborious hand copying. Eventually it was translated into old English and the hand copying of the manuscripts continued for hundreds of years until the invention of the Gutenberg printing press. By then Christianity had fragmented into numerous sects which had each assembled their own interpretation of the Bible texts. So as you can see the current bibles bear only a passing similarity to a notched staff.
If you really accept that Old Testament as absolute fact, who do you think I consider to be an idiot? By the way I am a devout Christian whose faith is beyond question. I am also sure that you have no idea how God made the universe or mankind and if you say that the Big Bang or evolution are impossible then I say to you “don’t try to tell God what He can or cannot do”
Excellent lecture extremely fascinating
It is a priceless lecture.
At 5:00 "So, despite this story having no real application..." as he then starts farting out about his silly big bang. Keep in mind this idiot is talking about creation. Again, CREATION. The silly big bang didn't create but the book of the bible that starts out with God creating has "no real application" regarding CREATION, his pathetic big bang does somehow.
Stephen, shove this up your ass...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God.
So if you want to pretend to be smart, please give me the laugh by giving your science how creation really happened by natural means. Also, throw in how we got the laws of nature, naturally.
I've watched this lecture >n times now, BRILLIANT
once they get the sound fixed (minor issue),so funny,informative.....
Watch again ! 22,088
Keith butler I’ve been having sound issues (low volume) on a lot of TH-cam content.
At 5:00 "So, despite this story having no real application..." as he then starts farting out about his silly big bang. Keep in mind this idiot is talking about creation. Again, CREATION. The silly big bang didn't create but the book of the bible that starts out with God creating has "no real application" regarding CREATION, his pathetic big bang does somehow.
Stephen, shove this up your ass...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God.
So if you want to pretend to be smart, please give me the laugh by giving your science how creation really happened by natural means. Also, throw in how we got the laws of nature, naturally.
Really great talker, thank you :)
At 5:00 "So, despite this story having no real application..." as he then starts farting out about his silly big bang. Keep in mind this idiot is talking about creation. Again, CREATION. The silly big bang didn't create but the book of the bible that starts out with God creating has "no real application" regarding CREATION, his pathetic big bang does somehow.
Stephen, shove this up your ass...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God.
So if you want to pretend to be smart, please give me the laugh by giving your science how creation really happened by natural means. Also, throw in how we got the laws of nature, naturally.
Amazing, great presentation.
We pretty much exist on the far side of the last super massive black hole in a parallel universe...
Thank you!
engaging speaker, and a great talk
At 5:00 "So, despite this story having no real application..." as he then starts farting out about his silly big bang. Keep in mind this idiot is talking about creation. Again, CREATION. The silly big bang didn't create but the book of the bible that starts out with God creating has "no real application" regarding CREATION, his pathetic big bang does somehow.
Stephen, shove this up your ass...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God.
So if you want to pretend to be smart, please give me the laugh by giving your science how creation really happened by natural means. Also, throw in how we got the laws of nature, naturally.
31:49 A nearly perfect representation of Yin/Yang. Amazing.
it made me want a pepsi
It was dumb and so are you.
At 5:00 "So, despite this story having no real application..." as he then starts farting out about his silly big bang. Keep in mind this idiot is talking about creation. Again, CREATION. The silly big bang didn't create but the book of the bible that starts out with God creating has "no real application" regarding CREATION, his pathetic big bang does somehow.
Stephen, shove this up your ass...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God.
So if you want to pretend to be smart, please give me the laugh by giving your science how creation really happened by natural means. Also, throw in how we got the laws of nature, naturally.
Excellent!
Great Lecture, I could listen to more. One thing he didn't touch on, probably cause there's no way to currently test, in those early distant small red shifted proto-galaxies what is the best guess to whether they had singularities already at the cores?
At 5:00 "So, despite this story having no real application..." as he then starts farting out about his silly big bang. Keep in mind this idiot is talking about creation. Again, CREATION. The silly big bang didn't create but the book of the bible that starts out with God creating has "no real application" regarding CREATION, his pathetic big bang does somehow.
Stephen, shove this up your ass...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God.
So if you want to pretend to be smart, please give me the laugh by giving your science how creation really happened by natural means. Also, throw in how we got the laws of nature, naturally.
Excellent lecture and lecturer
At 5:00 "So, despite this story having no real application..." as he then starts farting out about his silly big bang. Keep in mind this idiot is talking about creation. Again, CREATION. The silly big bang didn't create but the book of the bible that starts out with God creating has "no real application" regarding CREATION, his pathetic big bang does somehow.
Stephen, shove this up your ass...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God.
So if you want to pretend to be smart, please give me the laugh by giving your science how creation really happened by natural means. Also, throw in how we got the laws of nature, naturally.
Excellent speaker.
The presenters often point out things that don't show when the videos are uploaded to TH-cam. This means we lose some of the information. Could someone add annotations in where information is missing?
Is it possible to re-upload at a higher resolution? Great stuff!
Dumb stuff. You are dumb to believe this ass.
At 5:00 "So, despite this story having no real application..." as he then starts farting out about his silly big bang. Keep in mind this idiot is talking about creation. Again, CREATION. The silly big bang didn't create but the book of the bible that starts out with God creating has "no real application" regarding CREATION, his pathetic big bang does somehow.
Stephen, shove this up your ass...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God.
So if you want to pretend to be smart, please give me the laugh by giving your science how creation really happened by natural means. Also, throw in how we got the laws of nature, naturally.
@@2fast2block The only thing science "KNOWS" is that there's a ton it doesn't.
In the absence of knowledge one needn't fill in the blanks with a comforting story.
The big bang theory doesn't deal with anything less than time > 0, so at the moment we can't say anything definitively regarding 'what banged,' which seems like a better place for the religilious to dwell, and apply false pattern recognition to fit their story.
Science can stick with not knowing something, and keep searching for answers, without the need for a Zeus, Ra, Pazuzu, Ganesh, a DC-3 aircraft, or a Jehovah to make sense of everything.
The only thing a religious story accomplishes is stagnation in thought. If one 'knows' something, then why bother looking for answers that contradict this knowledge?
Under religion science does not advance. The internet, and your ability to argue on it, would not exist if one attempted to pray it into reality.
If ever bothered by those who think differently than you, just remember your own story and its passive-aggressive failsafes: forgive them, insert-deity, for they know not what they do. Or, turn the other cheek, or, gods work in mysterious ways, or judge others as ye shall be judged, or let he who is without sin cast the first stone, or love thy enemy, and if all else fails, talk to the snake.
what a great speaker
Fascinating lecture!! Shout out to the uploader.
I would go so far as to say that Beckwith is better than Krauss at presenting this subject in terms of presentational skills,
At 5:00 "So, despite this story having no real application..." as he then starts farting out about his silly big bang. Keep in mind this idiot is talking about creation. Again, CREATION. The silly big bang didn't create but the book of the bible that starts out with God creating has "no real application" regarding CREATION, his pathetic big bang does somehow.
Stephen, shove this up your ass...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God.
So if you want to pretend to be smart, please give me the laugh by giving your science how creation really happened by natural means. Also, throw in how we got the laws of nature, naturally.
2fast2block how did God create the universe?
@@Glasstable2011 supernaturally. How did you pass reading? Assuming you did, somehow.
2fast2block ok so how does that provide an explanation for anything? How does ‘supernaturally’ work? How is it different to magic?
And no thanks to the ad homs. My reading is just fine, thanks.
2fast2block also your complaint about ‘real science’ not doing anything is ironic, given the decades of scientific discovery that made this conversation possible.
An enjoyable lecture! I quite like Stephen Beckwith, but I can't help but feel like you really wouldn't wanna piss him off. Haha.
enjoyed.
At 5:00 "So, despite this story having no real application..." as he then starts farting out about his silly big bang. Keep in mind this idiot is talking about creation. Again, CREATION. The silly big bang didn't create but the book of the bible that starts out with God creating has "no real application" regarding CREATION, his pathetic big bang does somehow.
Stephen, shove this up your ass...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God.
So if you want to pretend to be smart, please give me the laugh by giving your science how creation really happened by natural means. Also, throw in how we got the laws of nature, naturally.
It's interesting watching this in March 2023, with JWST already out there, doing its thing.
I just watched another of these talks from 2005. Still great lectures though.
10 years on, it's even better!
At 5:00 "So, despite this story having no real application..." as he then starts farting out about his silly big bang. Keep in mind this idiot is talking about creation. Again, CREATION. The silly big bang didn't create but the book of the bible that starts out with God creating has "no real application" regarding CREATION, his pathetic big bang does somehow.
Stephen, shove this up your ass...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God.
So if you want to pretend to be smart, please give me the laugh by giving your science how creation really happened by natural means. Also, throw in how we got the laws of nature, naturally.
cool stuff
Dumb stuff.
At 5:00 "So, despite this story having no real application..." as he then starts farting out about his silly big bang. Keep in mind this idiot is talking about creation. Again, CREATION. The silly big bang didn't create but the book of the bible that starts out with God creating has "no real application" regarding CREATION, his pathetic big bang does somehow.
Stephen, shove this up your ass...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God.
So if you want to pretend to be smart, please give me the laugh by giving your science how creation really happened by natural means. Also, throw in how we got the laws of nature, naturally.
what accent is the guy who does the introduction??
This guy is one of the best presenters.
He's dumb. Get over it.
At 5:00 "So, despite this story having no real application..." as he then starts farting out about his silly big bang. Keep in mind this idiot is talking about creation. Again, CREATION. The silly big bang didn't create but the book of the bible that starts out with God creating has "no real application" regarding CREATION, his pathetic big bang does somehow.
Stephen, shove this up your ass...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God.
So if you want to pretend to be smart, please give me the laugh by giving your science how creation really happened by natural means. Also, throw in how we got the laws of nature, naturally.
@@2fast2block The bible was written by bronze age goat herders who didn't know where the sun went at night.
Who created the "supernatural creator"? A bunch of guys sitting around a camp fire making up stories.
very interesting and can be understood by non native and not specialist :)
I LOVE SPACE
I want to watch this but there’s some extremely grating background noise! I’m surprised more people didn’t pick up on it because it sounds like nails on a chalkboard
Will ferrels brother knows his stuff.
Beckwith is the man! my big bro was in his class at caltech
It starts at 2:50
The crap starts at 2:50. Yep.
At 5:00 "So, despite this story having no real application..." as he then starts farting out about his silly big bang. Keep in mind this idiot is talking about creation. Again, CREATION. The silly big bang didn't create but the book of the bible that starts out with God creating has "no real application" regarding CREATION, his pathetic big bang does somehow.
Stephen, shove this up your ass...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God.
So if you want to pretend to be smart, please give me the laugh by giving your science how creation really happened by natural means. Also, throw in how we got the laws of nature, naturally.
P.S.-Hawking calculated that left alone a singularity will eventually dissipate, but I haven't heard what happens when singularities merge into ever larger versions, is there a point where they could become so large and the gravity so great (*) to actually start affecting the expansion? Gravity is the weakest force but it also has by far the longest reach, the Oort cloud enveloping our Solar system demonstrates that.
(*)- Is it possible for gravity to become so intense that it starts dragging in the very fabric of space?
Titus Tucker.
then it all starts over again.BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM.A big boom
David Jones, I'm glad you find my name interesting enough to repeat, in the Queen's English it means Roman General's Food.
The answer is no. Shoving a lot of matter into a black hole doesn't affect the quantity of matter in the universe or the gravity associated with it. It just changes how that matter is distributed. Also, the expansion of the universe appears to be taking place everywhere, from the cores of stars to the emptiest regions of space. Gravity doesn't slow down the universe's expansion, it only determines whether bodies of matter remain gravitationally bound to one another or expansion carries them ever further apart.
Poor volume!
Imagine from our viewpoint on Earth, when we look out to the very edge of the visible universe, we're actually looking in to our common center.
At 5:00 "So, despite this story having no real application..." as he then starts farting out about his silly big bang. Keep in mind this idiot is talking about creation. Again, CREATION. The silly big bang didn't create but the book of the bible that starts out with God creating has "no real application" regarding CREATION, his pathetic big bang does somehow.
Stephen, shove this up your ass...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God.
So if you want to pretend to be smart, please give me the laugh by giving your science how creation really happened by natural means. Also, throw in how we got the laws of nature, naturally.
And our light is just arriving there as well!
I want to know and see what the other side of the galaxy looks like , where we are going to. Why don't they turn it around and look the other direction to see what we are going to.
He says 'okay' like Bill Hicks lol
What I am not quite able to wrap my head around is if we look back at proto galaxies and see them as they were 12 billion years ago ; we cannot see them as and where they are now- should they not be all very closed together - having only just departed from the original central Big Bang event its self. How can they be seen in opposite sides of the sky and in fact, in all directions around us. How has the original center come to appear as the peripheral shell? Like wise the CMB. How is it all around us if we are seeing it as it was near to the beginning of time and space?
Ralph Latham Look up something called as Cosmic Inflation
Ralph, I understand it is difficult to "wrap your head around" the theory of cosmic inflation. This is concept that many people grapple with, but I will try to explain how better to visualize this notion of expansion after the Big Bang. The reason it is so difficult for us is we comprehend explosions as blowing outward - and then - into space. In the case of the Big Bang, and expansion, you have to consider that there was originally nothing - no space for the universe to blow into. You could think about the universe as beginning as a flat plane with no up, down or left, right and no space around that plane - impossible it seems, but true. After the initial event, space rapidly spreads out in all directions, but from no real fixed point in time or space. What we consider space - as an empty void - is not really a void, but the outcome of that expansion as space is full of energy and matter. Space itself is not nothing, and the medium of space is what expands between the galaxies (dark energy). The initial Big Bang event happened some 13.8 billion years ago, so, the light we observe from these early galaxies, and the background radiation, can be seen on the outer edges of space itself because it expanded. All of the matter and energy of our universe is on the inside and the outer shell is where we see the background radiation.
Those proto-galaxies you mention, formed around the same time as ours - but as the universe expands - or as the space between galaxies expands - we see everything around us from the inside of an 'inside-out' explosion. Those proto-galaxies ARE NOT closer to the center, we only view them at an earlier time in the development of the universe. I will try to give an analogy that may help here. For instance, If there was a civilization on a planet in that proto-galaxy, and they were looking through a telescope at our Milky Way galaxy, the observers on that planet would view us as a proto-galaxy - no closer to the center, but still during our early stages of development - some 1 billion years after the Big Bang.
Think about it like a balloon that begins completely flat - so flat that you cannot see any edges or top - bottom view. This microscopic balloon is what exist before the initial event - then it suddenly expands. The skin of the balloon continues to inflate as material (energy, electrons, etc.) expand inside. I hope you are beginning to see that the center is not a fixed point - it is, in fact, on the outside of the balloon. The material of the universe is viewed from observers who are inside the balloon, and as we look through telescopes in all directions, we see the outer edges of this event. So, the universe does not have a specific center, because there is no center on an edge. Can you find the center on the skin of a balloon? No, the center has become the edge of that 3D space.
I know this is incredibly long, but I hope this helps...it is a extremely difficult concept, one I think astronomers still have difficulty explaining to laymen because of the terminology - "The Big Bang." This is a misnomer and creates false imagery of a bomb exploding - and it does not really help us understand that the origin of the universe was actually the creation of all space and time.
They don't understand your question, but I do, because I've thought about this too. It's kind of weird if you think about it, almost like a paradox...we're looking back to when the universe was really small, when all galaxies were close together, almost on top of each other, but from our perspective, they're all far apart, separated by billions of light years...how can this be simultaneously true? It is true because the part of the universe we come from was smack dab in the midst of all those galaxies and we've all kept our relative positioning for billions of years as they've all receded from us and vice versa. So basically, if we could somehow look through the veil of *whatever* blocking us from seeing the big bang itself (the horizon), we'd see some kind of infinitesimal dot smeared out in all directions.
Because that is how rapidly the expansion took place.
At 5:00 "So, despite this story having no real application..." as he then starts farting out about his silly big bang. Keep in mind this idiot is talking about creation. Again, CREATION. The silly big bang didn't create but the book of the bible that starts out with God creating has "no real application" regarding CREATION, his pathetic big bang does somehow.
Stephen, shove this up your ass...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God.
So if you want to pretend to be smart, please give me the laugh by giving your science how creation really happened by natural means. Also, throw in how we got the laws of nature, naturally.
Great lecture. Just one sad note. It's a pity that he had to say, "For those of you who don't believe in the Big Bang, maybe this will change your mind." Doesn't say much about the country you live in when you have to use qualifiers like that.
All it says is he is an elitist shit that assumes most people actually think that. They don't. Only hateful fucking liberal shits like him, and you, think people are really that stupid.
John Redman Herp, derp.
macsporan LOL, yeah I'm sure my Bachelor's in Environmental Science is fake.
You just don't understand how pathetic you are, scumbag fascist fuck..
It’s always straight to the America bashing with you eurotards. Your narcissism is ugly, you aren’t as smart as you think you are.
And your continent is on fire right now, Europe is in a terrible decline. What’s happening in your neck of the woods right now doesn’t say anything good about your people either.
I’m guessing you bash America in a daily basis, little do you know how much you rely on us, how much better a country we have to live in, and how bad Europe is about to get.
Is anyone else reminded of that OCP guy from RoboCop 2?
See- 1:44 /151:08 This young Lady just asked a valid question and Dr. Beckwith confounded confusion with his answer. The universe is expanding, yes? ...and what is it expanding...into?
Why does it have to be expanding into something?
hmmm...Is our Universe getting Larger? Yes, because of expansion correct? So if the Universe is becoming larger due to expansion, the Universe is expanding Into "something" ... Nothing can be considered something that would become part of our universe or perhaps nothing is being pushed aside. What we cannot say for lack of evidence is that "The Universe is everything" Just because we can't see beyond the Universe does not make fact that there is no existence beyond nor even a beyond.
@@jamescurtis1226 You seem to have been awfully confused, but I hope you got your answer! There's some fabulous PBS Spacetime videos on this very subject
Didn't know Will Ferrell is an astrophysicist.
"I'm gonna go get the papers, get the papers."
... So if I create several fake accounts, I can give more thumbs up, right?
Mercury Occupational span in Arbitrary realignment around the Galaxy belt is approximately 2 months & 1.5_week inequivalencies upon orbital
unto 5:16 Neptune 1 Uranus 2 Saturn 3 Jupiter 4 Mars 5 Earth 6 the opposite 6 months the Summern solstice of a 4 and 2 within the summer equinox
If stuff (galaxies, etc) are moving away from each other, why do astronomers say that The Milky Way and Andromeda are moving towards each other and will collide some time in future?
+hawkeye0248 It is because they are in a gravitationally bound cluster of galaxies, known as the local group. There are many such bound clusters swirling around each other which are collectively rushing away from other clusters.
So the galactic's clusters are all moving away?
How did they become gravitationally bound if moving away from each other then? Why is the Moon moving away from Earth if hooked by gravity. Same issue with planets around the Sun.
Space is expanding everywhere. Where objects come within the gravitational effects of each other they began moving toward one another just as an apple moves toward the Earth when it falls. The space between the released apple and the Earth are expanding but at this scale the effect is almost infinitely small and unmeasurable. The Moon is escaping from the Earth Moon gravitational bond. If the earth were a solid ball of rock the moon would not escape -but the trillions of megawatts of energy required to move the liquid oceans through their tidal patterns robs some of the orbital energy from the Moon. If the Earth had no Moon - all the Uranium, fossil fuels, solar and wind power harnessable on the Earth would not be enough to reproduce a minute fraction of these tidal effects.
i'm not a astrophysicist, but the local group have probably "always" been gravitationally bound. The moons orbital speed on the other hand is accelerating because the earth is rotating quicker than the moon orbits, and since the tidal bulge inflicted on earth by the moon "deforms" the earth, this gives the moon a gravitational tug in the direction of the earths rotation, angular momentum and whatnot. As for the planets around the sun, i haven't heard about any notable "wandering", I've heard the solar system is pretty much stable, unless you're locking forward several billions of years, in that case the sun would have gone red giant and scorched or eaten the earth, and wee would hopefully have moved on by then.
Is some of the missing mass also in the super massive black holes in the centre of galaxies? i f the calculation is done on light from the galaxy then the mass of the black hole won't be accounted for?
+Paul Dunstan The total mass of a galaxy is calculated by the curvature of light around that galaxy or cluster and that curvature is a direct relation to the gravity of the total mass
+Paul Dunstan No such thing as a black hole with mass. They are voids in space with current flowing through them and constrained by the accompanying magnetic fields.
I thought they were massive stars who's mass collapsed into an almost infinitely small space. Therefore they must have some mass?
Paul Dunstan
Yes. If you take the earth and compress it to the size of a peanut it would still have the same mass..but t would then be inside it's Schwarzchild limit and would be a black hole
The other guy is going on about voids and currents. What's all that about?
It just dawned on me the other day that a thousand years and one day happen at the same time in different places in the universe. It's simple (observed) general relativity. Time slows down and distance contracts because of gravity where there is a lot of matter. Conversely, time speeds up and distance expands where there is no matter in outer space.
This eliminates the need for dark matter since time speeds up in the outer spiral arms of a galaxy where there is not nearly as much matter. It eliminates the need for dark energy where space expands in outer space where there is no matter.
Another result of general relativity is that billions of years pass by in outer space (13 billion years) at the same time as thousands of years pass by where we are inside of the Milky Way galaxy. ...!
Conclusion: The time it took for Creation and since Creation in the Bible is absolutely true!
Ah, of course... as constant as Hubble, the red faced purveyor of enlightenment, shifting from revelation to revelation - all without the restrictions, the burden of knowledge - yet studiously avoiding the accolades of recognition, of grand prizes - not even certificates of study.
I understand it's called 'Jungle Jargon'.
Bliss - ignorance surely is absolute bliss isn't it?
@@Tinker1950 You didn't say anything.
@@JungleJargon
Quod erat demonstrandum......
@@Tinker1950 Speak for yourself.
@@JungleJargon
Isn't it remarkable how the vacant and gaseous are incapable of appreciating how dim and unsullied they are by education. How they infest the Internet with their ludicrous 'beliefs', their compulsion to deposit quantities of utter drivel without embarrassment, understanding or appreciation of how the real world sees them.
They are of course, magnificent examples of that well worn syndrome - the Dunning Krugers.
Please hire a decent soundtech!!!!
500 years from now there will be 500 million scientists and all of them not know zwicky still calling them round cow.
" we believe"
"light from a lighted......"
What happened to the word "lit"?
suits
He's dumb.
At 5:00 "So, despite this story having no real application..." as he then starts farting out about his silly big bang. Keep in mind this idiot is talking about creation. Again, CREATION. The silly big bang didn't create but the book of the bible that starts out with God creating has "no real application" regarding CREATION, his pathetic big bang does somehow.
Stephen, shove this up your ass...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God.
So if you want to pretend to be smart, please give me the laugh by giving your science how creation really happened by natural means. Also, throw in how we got the laws of nature, naturally.
This guy looks like Kevin Costner.
Ted Danson?
Will Ferrell? Anyway, one smart dude
i think you're thinking of ethan hawke
i still like it better than waterworld
But i the past matter was more concentrated and thus slowed down time more than it does now. So if anything it was expanding faster back then but it took more time to pass to equal the same time to pass now. in other words a second back then might have taken a year to pass where as today with matter strung across the universe less densely a second takes a second on Earth.
What was Hubble smoking???
So no direct answers to direct questions
Interesting.
I disagree with only one thing.
Europe has not taken America's lead in astronomy away.
What happened is that America stopped thinkpng it was that important
He did not commit to inflation. I don't think he believes in it.
At 5:00 "So, despite this story having no real application..." as he then starts farting out about his silly big bang. Keep in mind this idiot is talking about creation. Again, CREATION. The silly big bang didn't create but the book of the bible that starts out with God creating has "no real application" regarding CREATION, his pathetic big bang does somehow.
Stephen, shove this up your ass...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God.
So if you want to pretend to be smart, please give me the laugh by giving your science how creation really happened by natural means. Also, throw in how we got the laws of nature, naturally.
I got this
In another 100 years, this lecture will be the comedy hour.
Says the man who does not understand a bit of it, therefore it must be wrong.
I understood that Hubble did not seem so right 100 years later.
Dark matter and dark energy is like when Oggie Doggie asked Doggie Daddy, "What is grass made of?"
"Why green stuff, son." Hanna-Barbera knew about circular definitions.
@@tnekkc Just because we aren't totally sure now doesn't mean we should abandon current theories. Science builds upon itself so we need a starting point upon which to build better theories. Your comment shows a distinct misunderstanding about the concept of the scientific process.
@@butHomeisNowhere___ I was a consultant, selling myself as I can figure out anything. 95% of the time, once I convinced the stuck engineers what was wrong and what to do, they came up with something better. My real billable service was to get them to let go of what they believed.
Perhaps there is no dark matter and it is gravitational theory which is wrong.
That's one theory thats already out there.
At 5:00 "So, despite this story having no real application..." as he then starts farting out about his silly big bang. Keep in mind this idiot is talking about creation. Again, CREATION. The silly big bang didn't create but the book of the bible that starts out with God creating has "no real application" regarding CREATION, his pathetic big bang does somehow.
Stephen, shove this up your ass...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God.
So if you want to pretend to be smart, please give me the laugh by giving your science how creation really happened by natural means. Also, throw in how we got the laws of nature, naturally.
@@2fast2block ....you’re an idiot. You obviously didn’t understand the lecture
@@TheJonnyzeus wow, and your details are so.....not there.
The big bang was WWII
Is there anyone here just like me, who is listening but has no absolute idea what he is talking about... Lol but I am listening
Well you can always make notes, then go down to the library and check out a few real books. And if you do not understand what he is talking about, why are you laughing?
₩♤Nero Book Roman ♤Paul ¥♤Augustza persians £Deineseea assyrian ♤Domeßcen €Egypt ₩♡Markanthony BABYLONIANS ♧◇§Cesar geek's
I think dark matter is the spirit world, the 5th to 8th dimensions in M theory an dthe Calabi-Yau manifold is a mental portal to it when we sleep and when we pass on.
🗿
🗿🗿🗿🗿
GOD STARTED THE BIG BANG
No, He did not.
At 5:00 "So, despite this story having no real application..." as he then starts farting out about his silly big bang. Keep in mind this idiot is talking about creation. Again, CREATION. The silly big bang didn't create but the book of the bible that starts out with God creating has "no real application" regarding CREATION, his pathetic big bang does somehow.
Stephen, shove this up your ass...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God.
So if you want to pretend to be smart, please give me the laugh by giving your science how creation really happened by natural means. Also, throw in how we got the laws of nature, naturally.
Wow. A big nothing burger. With some dated pop sci thrown in.
🌍 Because time, and as we know it, is irrelevant to Elohim, Creator of the universe, man is incapable of arriving at a particular age of the universe; in our reality if you will, time is not a reliable means of measuring how old our universe is; again, because our universe wasn't created INSIDE OF TIME.
To put it another way...
man's scientific model for measuring time, therefore, the age of the universe, is created from out of a particular set of rules which include time; a particular paradigm that man can "relate to," and believes he is accurately MEASURING WITH. And, according to THIS dimension...he'd be right.
HOWEVER, the universe wasn't created inside this three dimensional realm. Therefore, the calculations derived therefrom, are obsolete.
(in regards to how old the universe is). Thank you for
sharing nonetheless! 😊
Elise, aka Godgirl
90% of the worlds population who believe? You people are so desperate to give yourselves legitimacy there is no level of deception that you're not willing to indulge in. You're a narrow minded and rather disgusting group of people.
85% of people believe in something. Sure.. in any of a half dozen major religions and 200 some offshoots. That's the voice of reason and absolute truth alright. You're still weakly grasping to legitimize yourself. You may PRETEND that you're unified but that's just another lie you like to tell. You're the most intellectually dishonest group that exists.
My lack of beliefs lead me towards anger rage etc.. You do like to make bold conclusions based on no evidence other than what you 'believe'. I believe it therefore it's true. The fail logic of theists everywhere.
Again the hallmark of intellectually dishonesty. People also used to believe thunder was the wrath of gods, doesn't make it true. You cling to your security blanket and indulge in all the self deception and dishonesty that it requires of you. You can even keep judging others like you somehow hold the high ground believing in magical sky beings. A framework of lies and self deception that you cling to because it's comforting.
Grow up and wake up from your cheap and cruel myths
Fact is that religious people would burn alive anyone who doesn't agree with their cheap myths ... whether you talk about respect or not that is the fact. You lot are the lowest of the low. Grow up. Travel and read a little.
maaaaaaaaaaasive waste of time
Melanie Ramírez shut up, the men are talking about important shit
Two billion years? I don't think so. So many lost people, turning to everything but a KJV Bible for answers.
+Joshua Haynes - First Council of Nicea? Don't remember seeing you there or King James when the vote was taken. Little late now buckwheat.
smartphones lasers gps computers all a possible due to this stuff the kjv bible cant even convince a small portion of the world it has anything to do with reality let alone predict anything its ok if you want to live your life according to a fictional book just don't watch this kind of informational evidence based reality stuff.
Joshua Haynes, it's known as 'pride.' That which keeps man from searching the bible, and seeking Yahweh, the living God for answers. Thank you for your wisdom, Joshua. Yeshua shares your name! 🕇
🌿Peace & Joy in Yeshua!✡
Elise, aka Godgirl
Joshua Haynes - The people watching this are "turning" to science for answers. Learning about reality.
Joshua Haynes / What do you mean by lost people ?
Yeah because someone under 100 years old knows for a fact life began billions of years ago..
No, but we believe it's part of a natural process rather than the result of 'magic'..
So nothing exploding from nothing isn't 'magic' ? You're a bright one
blah blah blah we make up our own explanations
Fascinating argument
@@butHomeisNowhere___ The ass in the vid gave stupidity.
At 5:00 "So, despite this story having no real application..." as he then starts farting out about his silly big bang. Keep in mind this idiot is talking about creation. Again, CREATION. The silly big bang didn't create but the book of the bible that starts out with God creating has "no real application" regarding CREATION, his pathetic big bang does somehow.
Stephen, shove this up your ass...
Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We KNOW these laws. We have NO doubts about them. We also KNOW that the laws of nature can't come about without a Lawgiver, God.
So if you want to pretend to be smart, please give me the laugh by giving your science how creation really happened by natural means. Also, throw in how we got the laws of nature, naturally.
blah blah blah we are so proud of ourselves..