That way I can slow it down to 80% (24/30 = .8) and it will still play at normal speed. It looks smoother too. That is my preference but shooting at 24fps to begin with works fine too. Hope this helps 👍🏼
You're doing it so wrong. Anamorphic isn't just about the black bars, you could crop that on to any old footage. It squeezes the footage so you can have the wide aspect ratio and still use all of the sensor. Create a proj with the pixel aspect ratio of the lens and change the pixel aspect ratio of the footage in Premiere. This way you're not degrading your footage by reducing the amount of vertical pixels and Premiere won't have to do any extra rendering because it's only interpreting the shape of each pixel.
@@AerialMotionPhotographyI would say you wouldn't notice much difference but you want the best possible master, for the nerdery. I bought it for the lens flare characteristics so go fly round some lamp posts.
@@Peytonsdad I saw some vid where a guy worked out the correct pixel aspect ratio should be 1.929:1. Use that when creating the proj or if you want to drop it into a regular proj right-click and 'interpret footage' to change the ratio rather than 'transform'. I haven't used PP for a few years but should still be the way to do it.
Why you don't shoot on the drone with 24fps right away instead of converting 30fps -> 24fps in post?
That way I can slow it down to 80% (24/30 = .8) and it will still play at normal speed. It looks smoother too. That is my preference but shooting at 24fps to begin with works fine too. Hope this helps 👍🏼
Can u shoot vertical?
Yep!
You're doing it so wrong. Anamorphic isn't just about the black bars, you could crop that on to any old footage. It squeezes the footage so you can have the wide aspect ratio and still use all of the sensor.
Create a proj with the pixel aspect ratio of the lens and change the pixel aspect ratio of the footage in Premiere. This way you're not degrading your footage by reducing the amount of vertical pixels and Premiere won't have to do any extra rendering because it's only interpreting the shape of each pixel.
hmmm okay I will look into that and see. Also I like your username. Adam Bomb is my nickname.
@@AerialMotionPhotographyI would say you wouldn't notice much difference but you want the best possible master, for the nerdery. I bought it for the lens flare characteristics so go fly round some lamp posts.
How do you do that?
@@Peytonsdad I saw some vid where a guy worked out the correct pixel aspect ratio should be 1.929:1. Use that when creating the proj or if you want to drop it into a regular proj right-click and 'interpret footage' to change the ratio rather than 'transform'. I haven't used PP for a few years but should still be the way to do it.