Dreamcast vs Xbox (Dead or Alive 2) Graphics Comparison - Dual Longplay
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ก.ย. 2024
- A side-by-side comparison of the Dead or Alive game for Dreamcast and Original Xbox (Classic).
DOA2 Dreamcast version = Dead or Alive 2 Limited Edition (left side)
DOA2 Original xbox = Dead or Alive 2 Ultimate (right side)
Note: Please use earphone / headphone, because the audio is binaural.
Dreamcast vs Ps2 of Dead or Alive 2: • Dual Longplay [13] Dea...
Sega Saturn vs Ps1 of Dead or Alive 1: • Dual Longplay [24] Dea...
![Dual Longplay [24] Dead or Alive (Sega Saturn vs Playstation) Side by Side Comparison](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/IO5towF_bhU/mqdefault.jpg)
![Dead Or Alive 3 (Xbox Series X) Kasumi Gameplay [Very Hard] - Story & Ending [4K 60FPS]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ELXisRADxjo/mqdefault.jpg)
![🎤 จับฉลากร้องเพลง x P’ #XXSIVK [EP.1] (2/2) เพื่อนจับได้คำไหน..ต้องร้องคำนั้น เริ่ม! 💓🎶 #MXFRUIT](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/1bJvMJXmeS4/mqdefault.jpg)
![[KOF XV] Character Comparison of The King of Fighters XV (KOF XIV vs KOF XV) Side by Side | VCDECIDE](/img/n.gif)
I got this game along with a dreamcast and nfl 2k, holiday season 2000 and was blown away by the graphics ! Easily one of the best fighting games of all time with an amazing fighting and counter system ! I spent years upon years playing it non stop. Back in 1999-2000 those graphics were breathtaking and still look amazing 20+ years later ! The dreamcast version will always be my favorite, it was so sharp and vibrant.
Aww man, what did you think when sega announced they were going to discontinue the Dreamcast a few months after you got it?
@@tanmy85 it was pretty shocking because the console was still a new system on the market. I was in middle school at the time, and everybody was talking about ps2 this, ps2 that. Everybody had just gotten dreamcasts but were already prepared to forget it once ps2 started nearing it's release. I kept on playing my dreamcast for years however, even after picking up its spiritual successor, the OG xbox holiday season 2002 (some of the sega team went to work under Microsoft's umbrella).
Just To Let People Know Sega Dreamcast Version Came in 1999 While xbox version Came Out in 2004. A Five Year Gap Between The 2
The PS2 Version was also called DOA2: Hardcore. It had more content than the Dreamcast version did last time i checked.
@@etrotm12thebluewolf15 Also there was the import release of DOA2 for DC that improved the problems form the US release. Still better than the PS2 version but not as well known as Tecmo of Japan and Sega of Japan could not negotiate the release of DOA2. However because it came out after the US release a lot was improved
Yeah, it says that onscreen.
Yup, not really a comparison to be made. the xbox remake is based on the doa3 and xtreme beach volleyball engines.
Not to mention that they run on completely different engines, the DC's one was very archaic compared to a 2004 engine. The DC would have been an amazing system with these new techs.
Everytime I see doa2 on Dreamcast I image how ninja Gaiden would have looked.
The dreamcast wouldn't be able to handle ninja gaiden
@@poncho828 uhmm yes it could, any platform can "handle" any game to it's best abilities. It just won't look as pretty as the Xbox version. It will look like a Dreamcast title.
Tecmo chose the xbox for ninja gaiden because it was the only system capable of running it without compromise. The Ps2 is more powerful than the dreamcast and it couldn't run ninja gaiden without it playing like crap.
@@poncho828 Of course it could. It uses the DOA engine, they just needed to design it around the hardware. It was initially going to be developed for the dreamcast. If you look at Ninja Gaiden, it's basically just the DOA engine teleporting the character to different arenas, every time you go through a door, jump in a hole etc the angles are fixed. meaning that the next room isn't really being rendered until "the switch" has occurred. These different rooms/stages doesn't have to be more demanding than a DOA2 stage, heck the different room/stages doesn't even have to be connected to one another. That's why they were able to get the game up to both impressive visuals and frame rates. Dreamcast Ninja Gaiden would most likely also have been 60fps.
@@PixelShade That´s funy, do you really think that? There is a small but big difference, Ninja Gaiden has large maps and multiple characters on screens while DOA it´s a 1v1 fighting game. No way Dreamcast could run Ninja Gaiden with at 60 fps, not even 30 without downgrading all the game and placing multiple loading screens on every mission.
seeing this just makes me wish they would bring back the original Trilogy to current gen
I'm hoping it hits backwards compat on the Xbox One/Series. They already did Ninja Gaiden so DOA is likely as well. Then again, revisiting older 3d fighters can be a bit weird especially when the newer versions are being sold in stores. It might be deemed more trouble than its worth.
Agreed would love a collection edition for the first 3 games well if possible also include doa 4 since i could played that one didn't have and xbox back then
@@ZeniusFox It should be, it works on Xbox 360.
Well... It kinda happen
The dreamcast was such an underrated console. I'm glad I own it, and this game, on it.
Man, DoA 2 blew my mind away on Dreamcast; models, animation, scenery and textures... it looked insane!
Quite unfortunate, that I never played the XBox port; but man, does it look nice for a 2004 release; still, by then, it had been a 5 year gap! ...how incredible is it that a machine from 1998 still holds up this well?
It's such a beautiful game on both systems... man what could have been, had Sega not given up on they white box of wonder.
Thats why Saturn, Dreamcast and ogxbox will never leave the collection, they're the ones that still hold up perfectly.
@@krono5el , most definitely! I treasure my Saturn, Dreamcast and XBox; they're some of the most fun I've ever had in gaming, and each blew my mind back when they first released.
I have both the Xbox and PS2 versions. It looks amazing when played on an Xbox 360. High definition widesceen and everything.
@@aaron_aj_knight_95 , man I can only imagine... It must truly look the part when payed on X360.
I want the Dreamcast version till this day. I have Hardcore on PS2 and I play that more than the Xbox version because I love that look the best. I love how crisp the Dreamcast textures look which is why I have to get it.
Dreamcast was so advanced when it debuted! So vibrant and sharp compared to early PS2 games. DOA2 still looks great today!
glad you said early ps2 games cause tekken 5 is a beast.
Beast of shit Tekken 5 is so boring... Soul Calibur for Dreamcast is the truly beast.
@@sudacagamer Yeh a game that got release later will always be better visually.
Aaaaand DOA2 was an early PS2 game too.
Low resolution though, not 480p like DC. Tekken 4 onwards though....wow@@zodiacthundaga7264
Back then and still now they tend to wash the colors out as the graphics improve..the y2k vibe, vibrancy, smoothness, also something about that lighting of the dreamcast version too it all just really made you feel like you were playing a futuristic game, blew my mind as a kid that a game could look so good
Xbox version looks like a remake rather than an updated port.
It is a remake.
It actually is a remake. PS2 version was a port of Dreamcast
@@crashpal not exactly.... Ps2 version was programmed for ps2... Dreamcast version is Naomi variant...
It's dead or alive ultimate... It's include dead or alive 1 arcade disk and dead or alive 2 remake with Hitomi from dead or alive 3 as playable character...thats remind me when I was on college in 2000 for dreamcast version.... And for university in 2004 for Xbox version... I still have both.... My heart go for dreamcast version but... Technically ultimate is faster and superior...
@@RIFCHE23 Right, it was reworked to function on the PS2.
Whatever console you play Dead or Alive on, you win.
the Xbox was a beast back when it came out in 2001. so sad that almost all if not all third party games got made on the PS2 first and then ported to the xbox. The programmable shaders on the xbox's gpu where ground breaking along with the pentium 3 used as the cpu.
I miss Itagaki so much, DOA was not the same after he left and Ninja Gaiden was destroyed....
The original Xbox was definitely the most powerful system of this generation but it also came out last the PS2 came out more than the year before the Xbox and the GameCube came out 2 months early so it made sense to go make games for the consoles what had dedicated followers and companies what already proven themselves In The Gaming Community. Releasing late in the generation and costing a lot of money can easily kill a console on a rival just look at the PS3 that was one of its major problems originally but it was able to catch up.
@@jayarcher3331 Yea but knowingly the ps3 had a weak engine compare to the xbox 360 powerful next gen that truly was at the very list
@@iancruz6617the PS3 is more powerful than the Xbox 360 that's a fact if you're just looking at specs on a paper. PS3 internally was built in a very interesting way making it hard for third-party companies to utilize the power of the system so most of times games were just ported form Xbox 360 version instead of working with the hardware on the PS3.First-party games like uncharted 3 and the last of us look amazing look more graphically impressive than most other game in the generation and that's just shows you the true power of the PS3.I think the Xbox would have did better if it came out a year early like the ps3 would have did better if it came out a year early and it cost less.
Usually the practice was to make the base version on PS2 and then port it to Xbox to get faster framerates. At least offered Xbox universal 480p support/sharper picture.
@@jayarcher3331 The PS3's shared RAM was not a smart choice from Sony's part though, kinda dumb to split it into 256MB chunks if you think about it.
Cell might have been powerful, but it's of no use if it's a pain in the ass to develop for.
I love both versions, though i didnt have a Dreamcast growing up (Only had one for a little bit) i decided to get the PS2 version. It was called DOA2: Hardcore. I loved the CG Galleries, the English voices, more costumes, a playable Bayman (Who sadly doesnt have a theme song in the game), more stages including Gen-Fu and Lei-Fang's DOA1 stages, and that was when the whole Rock Star trend in the DOA games started i think. Ironically the opening that was in DOA2: Hardcore wasnt kept in Xbox remake.
For Xbox its a remake of DOA2 titled Dead or Alive 2 Ultimate. In there we have online multiplayer (Which no longer works now), improved graphics, recycled and improved assets from DOA3 so now it controls like DOA3 but much more fluid, faster gameplay, a CG gallery as well but with pictures coming from DOA Xtreme Beach Volleyball instead of original renders like in the PS2 port. We also not only have Bayman as a playable character but Hitomi from DOA3 as well. You can unlock her in the game IF you have DOA3 memory in your storage. Why do i keep mentioning DOA3 you ask? Because if you own both games for you can use DOA2 Ultimate as the booster disc for the North American version of DOA3 (You get a lot of bang for your buck with this game eh? lol) Its especially an ideal move to make if you own a Backward Compatible Xbox 360 like myself since the booster disc are hard to come by nowadays and even if you owned them i highly doubt they work on Xbox 360. And theres also a new CG opening intro revolving around Ayane's childhood, a hidden interview with Itagaki the man who created DOA originally, and of course another variation of the more typical DOA2 Opening, but this time its much longer.
I got a massive soft spot for DOA2 (Hardcore) due to how nostalgic i feel towards the game's essence (Like i said i didnt really grow up much with Dreamcast), but i gotta hand it to DOA2 Ultimate. It just has SO MUCH stuff jam packed in there. It's not to say theres no value in getting DOA2, since you would be getting the original experience. DOA2 Ultimate wins this one despite the more muted or "realistic" colors.
doa2 ultimate is my favorite fighting game of all time. i used to have best of 200 matches in it with friends. hours on end of "winner stays"
Can't go wrong with either upgraded version of Dead or Alive 2. I'd still even get the vanilla Dreamcast version if I can find it cheap.
THANKS for the information of the booster disc.
@@vstevenbjobs4639 I forgot to respond to this. But no problem. You just gotta unlock EVERY costume in DOA2 Ultimate or get every character's item from Survival mode (Which is both very exhausting, and repetitive as its just based on major RNG)
It's crazy how good the Dreamcast version looks and feels!
Dreamcast version of Dead Of Alive 2 (which I own) has animated select character enabled via option as found on the XBox version which came later. The initial loading take some time due to GD-ROM access.
Remastered version of DOA1/2/3 would be amazing!! The jumps in graphics and engines each game would be amazing to see all on one disc
There is no physical release of course but DOA 1/2/3 are backwards compatible on xbox and runs at 4k 60fps
@@femto8402 Xbox series X?
@@muhammadmutashimbillah3960 yeah, and one and 360.
Honestly they both look good. I’d be a fool to sit here and say the Dreamcast version is far superior due to the Xbox version being a little more reworked. But man the colors, the models, and stages still look great on the Dreamcast. Cool video!!
Dramcast colours are more vibrant than the Xbox ones. There is no technical reason, it just reflected an almost universal trend towards muted colours as the 2000s went on. A quite annoying one that has plagued at least 2 generations of gaming.
totally nailed it : 2000's reflected greyish/greenish cold colors in ads, movies, video clips as well as games : lots of 3D games on the PS2 reflects this era of desaturated filters
Yeah probably the PS2 is a factor too. It's not that it can't do very colourful games, but even the most vibrant ones (eg.: Ape Escape 2, Pac Man World 2, Alien Ominid..) have something off and dark about their hues. But that trend was too widespread for the PS2 to be the only factor.
Just compare DMC5 to The older ones, It only gotten worse
There IS a technical reason, and it's called shaders.
The Dreamcast just couldn't handle advanced shaders and lighting like the Xbox could, that's why it looks more cartoony and flat on the Dreamcast.
In nature most colors are muted, just go outside and look at anything in the street, only some flowers have vibrant colors.
there is a technical reason. characters on dreamcast do not react to light. that's why they pop up so much from the scenery. which is not a good thing.
by no means it is due to "better colors". just worse lighting.
Well Xbox version wins when like for like stages were compared. Why? Better lightening effects, slightly higher geometric detail, better textures, and the cut scenes seem to run at higher FPS. Now with that said, the Dreamcast has amazing color, and the image is relatively clean when using VGA. Xbox usually has darker gamma setting internally so the highlights never appear as strong. On the flip the DC is really good highlights from blues, to reds and magenta colors pop. So if there's one thing Sega nailed with the DC, it was the internal color rendering which sticks out even among current gen hardware.
Brilliant explanation.
@@keenanrobinson7239 Np and thanks! I do recall reading about Power VR precision internal color buffer back in the late 90s. It could reduce the color output in half and still achieve the same results with 32 bit tile cached down sampling. Sega's arcade experience using RGB paired with the Dreamcast impressive hardware produced a look unique to the DC. You can often tell DC games apart simply by the color and clarity. PS2 display was muddy and washed out looking. Xbox color had too much gamma but could produce a high contrast image. Gamecube is in the middle between the DC and Xbox often producing colorful imagery but missing highlight detail.
Dreamcast was a 16bit color platform. That alone, makes it considerably worse than the Xbox version, though you wouldn’t truly notice that factor in a video like this.
@@Darknight0681 DC rendered in 32bit color internally when taking into account 8 bit alpha. DC could take the same 32bit color mode and output to 16 bit dither mode with mild IQ lost to save bandwidth when needed. To get more technical DC had 7 buffer formats including; 888 for 24bit color without alpha, and 8888 for 32bit ARGB including alpha channel. Because Dreamcast was tiled based it's 800 mbps performed closer to 6 gbps due to tiling and it's on chip Z buffer. It wouldn't make sense for games to render in 16 bit color unless porting from the source that was 16 bit color or by artist intent.
There is no winner in this because those 2 games are différent, the Xbox one doa is a remake with better graphic, new danger zone, new costume and New character, the only thing they have in comon is the ATH
It would be better to compare doa2 Dreamcast and PS2 version
The Dreamcast version still looks amazing
Back when DOA was a quality fighting series and not a joke of a money pit created by one of the greediest, pathetic developers out there. RIP DOA. Screw off, Koei Tecmo😥
The fighting game part is still pretty goodits just the dlc practises
Capcom is up there with their fighters
Couldn’t agree more, literally charging a thousand dollars over the life of a game for costumes.
Usually when people make comments about "developers" being greedy, they actually mean to say "publishers". Developers get paid shit wages for the number of hours they put into game development.
stfu.
Man. I remember the day we got the Xbox and the first DOA that was on it (was is 2?). That was really the first game that made it clear the Xbox was considerably more powerful than its peers at the time. Took the system to all my friends' houses to show it off.
Dreamcast forever!
Fanatic
Yes,dreamcast *FOREVER*
*!!!SEEEGAAAAAA!!! :-)*
😲😂😂😂😂😂
"tiny cuts" gave me a nam flashback :P loved this game and still have my day one copy. both versions blew me away when released.
OG Xbox was ahead of its time.
I miss the presentation and announcer from 2. thank you for making this
Dreamcast realmente foi maravilhoso q incrível a qualidade desse game nele levando em consideração q e um hardware lançado em 98, e q nem teve oportunidade de mostrar tudo q podia fazer um game de primeira leva no.primeiro kit de desenvolvimento fazer isso e incrível
Verdade imagina se tivesse continuado e dado certo
Both looks great, but I gotta go with the Dreamcast version because it looks pretty amazing for the era it has launched.
2 Ultimate is still my favorite DoA. So much content, and the game still looks good today. The graphics have held up.
The Dreamcast version is phenomenal. It’s neck and neck with Soul Calibur for the best game on the system. While the Xbox version does look better, due to a lot more power, there’s no denying how gorgeous the Dreamcast version was and still is.
DoA2 Ultimate on OG Xbox runs on the updated DoA3 engine.
Nonetheless, it's impressive to see the graphical progression. Dreamcast version still looks great too!
Joguei demais esse game no Dreamcast. Maravilhoso pra época.
Dreamcast ta ate mais bonita
é bom até hoje
A versão do Dreamcast é incrível, porem a do Xbox é muito superior por motivos óbvios!
OBS: arquitetura Power PC faz falta hoje em dia, esses consoles eram verdadeiros monstros.
xbox é x86. powerpc nao faz falta nenhuma, foi abandonado por que era uma porcaria. fraco e quente. nem a apple conseguiu mais segurar e mudou pra intel. ironicamente esta saindo da intel pelos mesmos motivos.
I disagree... look how blurry the colors are compared to the dreamcast
O doa2 de Xbox foi lancado no final da vida do Xbox, 360 já estava para sair, ja a do DC no começo de sua vida curta kkk, a versão do PS2 poderia ter sido melhor do que a do Dreamcast se tivessem polido o game um pouco mais, mas infelizmente é a pior versão das 3, do Xbox ganha por ter saído a mais de 5 anos da original de dreamcast
a versão do DC ganhou em tudo.
Ofc the graphics would look better on the Dreamcast 2(xbox), would be plain stupid just to port it and do nothing at all...But the fact that the Dreamcast version still looks great...
Amazing memories i swear i still have both versions 😭😭😭🌹🌹❤️❤️
me too
I still own the Ps2 version
The Xbox graphics are better, but Dreamcast color palette is superior. I think I prefer the DC version only because of how vivid the game is in this hardware.
The Xbox version is now bc on Xbox series s and x. It’s widescreen 4K and looks amazing. Really good game too!
It is funny how no one is praising Xbox's graphics and features. Is like if u say something it will backlash at you... The only comment that i liked was one of the Japanese comments... he says and i quote " これは良い比較
並べたらだいぶ違うもんだなあ" totally agree with him/her and thats coming from a Japanese perceptive... also both games were made by the same developer (Team Ninja). Imagine praising the old one and ignoring all the hard work they put on the new version... I bet they loved working on the original xbox's new powerful hardware....
Dreamcast: I will use this box to store my beers.
Xbox: ok.
I have this game and I loved it, I think the Dreamcast version at least looked better than the PS2 version for some reason...
The Dreamcast version holds up pretty well considering the Xbox was nearly twenty times as powerful. Mostly it looks like the Xbox version has higher geometry, alpha effects, volumetric lighting, better shadow maps and more detailed environments.
you're on drugs. The XBOX wasn't anywhere near to being 20 times more powerful as the Dreamcast. Where'd you concoct those horseshit numbers from?! Uranus?!😆
PS2 is two or three times more powerful than DC and Xbox is 4 times more powerfully than PS2 and 2 times more powerful than Gamecube. I believe Xbox is about 6 to 7 times more powerful than Dreamcast.
@@realamericannegro977 I believe you're two or three times more delusional than the average person. None of what you said about any of those systems are remotely true. Get your facts straight, then try again😆
@@shinbakihanma2749 I see you one of those sore loser Dreamcast fans that really believe it can genuinely hang with the systems that came after it. Everything I mention was common knowledge back in 2002.
I know Xbox is more powerful than Dreamcast but I prefer the Dreamcast, more coloured and looks like an anime.
これは良い比較
並べたらだいぶ違うもんだなあ
The Xbox version to me its a remaster of the Dreamcast version but better visuals fluid 60 fps gameplay, still DOA:LE on Dreamcast graphics still holds 2020 pure polygon powerhouse..
Dreamcast has that Bomb Factory song for the intro. One of the best songs ever.
Except you can't hear what the characters are saying over the music. It's way too loud.
HUGOOOO!!!!!
@@aaron_aj_knight_95 doesn't matter, the song is better.
The DC graphics blew me away at the time
Yeah but it's been killed by ps2
@@christian9146 DC can hold up to some PS2 games
When dead or alive was still cool...
The Xbox version is what the PS2 version should have looked like, but instead it wound up looking worst then the Dreamcast version, a less powerful console.
Gamers were told the PS2 version was suppose to have better visuals then the Dreamcast version. I traded in my Dreamcast version for another game, and later bought the PS2 version and i could not spot any difference. Then later i realized it actually looks worse then the Dreamcast version (much more aliasing).
@AnEn If your talking about PS2`s supposed 4mb of Ram, that claim was either a mistake by a Sony rep, or by gaming journalist. The 4 MB was for its frame buffer which was separate from its main Ram. The PS2 video ram is within the 32 MB of main Ram on its system.
Also the PS2 did have a form of texture compression and Anti aliasing, the PS2 was just difficult to program for.
Also the claim by Itagaki that the Xbox is 500 times more powerful is a huge exaggeration. The PS2`s cpu is more powerful then the Xbox`s cpu. Many people think the Xbox has a more powerful cpu because it has a much higher clock speed then the PS2. But clock speed does not measure overall performance. The PS2`s 64 bit cpu combined with certain other features make the PS2`s CPU more powerful.
Floating point unit measures the overall performance of the PS2`s and Xbox`s cpu`s. The PS2`s CPU has a Floating point unit performance of 6.2 gigaflops. While the Original Xbox has 2.9 gigaflops.
The Original Xbox has a more powerful GPU and more ram then the PS2.
And the reason DOA2 for the PS2 use interlacing resolution, while the Dreamcast and Xbox version used Progressive scan resolution, was because Sony did not give developers access to the PS2`s
Progressive scan mode til 2002. And DOA2 for the PS2 came out in the year 2000. powerful
Also, you're not being honest as far as the PS2's issues with textures.
The palletised textures/cluts form a type of "compression", sure, if you want to play semantics. But this was highly limited and compounding for PS2. It was largely pyrrhic, as it pushed low quality -- as the PS2 had an abundance of 4-bit textures due to these tech constraints -- which meant that, likewise the outcome created a lack of variation in texture depth and color.
Lack of modern compression compared to the other machines is what we're discussing, and the results are circular: a lack of texture variation, clarity and color depth in PS2 releases.
The machine lacks for vram due to compression issues. This is a traceable fact. And we can see the outcomes on textures, which are extremely poor on average.
The PS2's texturing abilities were very limited compared to Xbox, without even considering issues such as lights/shaders.
Just as you're not being honest as far as resolution output. The PS2's games output at an interlace signal throughout the generation with some notable exceptions; if your argument was truly accurate, and the PS2 had no trouble with this after 2001, then the issue should have been solved from 2002 and beyond. The majority of PS2 software remained interlaced/sub-480p throughout its shelf life.
@@anen9332 The PS2 served as a GPU also but not completely, it also has a GPU which could produce many effects in Software. Just not as much as Xbox and Gamecube.
When it came to graphic capabilities the PS2 was close to an Xbox. With Xbox being the more powerful console overall but not by much.
The PS2 best looking games rival Xbox best looking games despite the fact that the PS2 was much more difficult to program for. So the Xbox was not a big jump in power from the PS2.
@@PPHDocumentaries You clearly know very little about the PS2, or these devices.
The Emotion Engine was largely the GPU and CPU, combined. It's well known that the PS2 was not a machine designed around a modern GPU setup with lots of frontend suites; the GS -- Graphics Synthesizer -- was not a GPU in any truly meaningful sense.
The PS2 worked through the EE and its VPUs -- with VPU0 only managing a true throughput of 10% or less on average, which created another major hardware bottleneck -- which, again, means that your GFlops numbers off the EE as some measure of "CPU power" is dishonest at its core. The EE was essentially both the CPU and GPU, which means that the 6GFlops number essentially accounts for the entire system's output and ability as CPU/GPU methodology.
The Xbox was a system that had a separate CPU, which was more powerful in CPU-related tasks, and GPU, which was also much, much more powerful so far as GPU-related issues such as native hardware effects and overall grunt.
Further, your last paragraph is fanboyish nonsense. The Xbox was huge jump over the PS2 off of both chips, and we saw that in both graphical fidelity and world design.
Unlike today, where the Xbox and PS4 lines all run the same software, there were games on the OG Xbox that simply wouldn't work on the PS2; again, we can see this with Half-Life 2, Doom 3 and, yes, Halo: CE.
We also see massive downgrades in games like Splinter Cell or Just Cause from the Xbox to PS2, to the point where Splinter Cell's maps and entire lighting system had to be resigned for the PS2. Lowered for it, in other words.
This speaks to a generational gap in power and design. Which makes sense, as the Xbox had a SIMD CPU and fully-programmable shader GPU. Those are massive differences so far as efficiency and power off the chipsets.
@@anen9332 The PS2`s CPU is called the Emotion engine, and its GPU is called the Graphics Synthesizer. The PS2`s GPU functioned very similar to the Saturn`s GPU. Just because its not a traditional GPU that does not mean its not a GPU.
And no the 6.2 Gflops is only for the CPU not, the GPU. I don`t where you get these dumb ideas from. Just because CPU is used to add more effects on the PS2 that does no mean the PS2 does not have a GPU.
Eyes don`t lie people do. Their are plenty of side by side comparison videos on youtube between Xbox and PS2 games and for the most part the differences are subtle.
And i own the PS2, Xbox and GameCube with plenty of games. And My Xbox HD component cable is of a higher quality them my PS2 one. And theirs still not a big difference in visual quality.
The PS2 processor is not only more powerful then its contemporary competitors I.E Xbox, Gamecube and Dreamcast, but it was also more powerful the any of the processors on a commercial Desktop PC for a little while.
And i should have mentioned that their are plenty of PS2 games which run on Progressive scan resolution. For example; Tekken 4; 5 and Dark Resurrection, Soul Calibur 2, Both God Of Wars, Gran Turismo 4, Black, Destroy All Humans, Fight Night and many more. And all those games with progressive came after Sony gave developers tools to access the progressive scan mode which was back in 2002, at a time when the Dreamcast was dead. I read it in a gaming magazine back in the day. It was not something i pulled out my poophole.
Press start & menu = Dreamcast
Character select = Dreamcast
Text (ko, replay etc..) = Dreamcast
Energy bar = Dreamcast
3d = Xbox
Scenarios = Xbox
Color = Dreamcast
Snow, rain, fog = Xbox
Winner = Dreamcast
Dreamcast can output more color than any other 6th gen home console at that time. That's why many 6th gen games looked so bleak or washed out.
Thé 4 first things depend of you're taste and doa on Xbox have more character, New danger zone in stage, New costume and New moves for the character so the Xbox one is better , but there is still no winner because doa 2 ultimate on Xbox is a remake and a ultimate version they are very différent from each other
Xbox and Dreamcast ...amazing console!!!
Both have held up extremely well but the Xbox version... just wow, still looks awesome after all these years. Reasons like this are why the OG Xbox is still my favourite console, followed by Dreamcast and Xbox 360. PS2 is great but too many JRPG's for my personal taste, not a huge fan of the genre. OG Xbox, Dreamcast and Xbox 360 are my bag.
a monster of power
A versão do Dreamcast é extremamente bonita para a época que saiu, joguei muito na época ela e soul calibur. A versão de Xbox é mais aprimorada ainda, mas saiu muitos anos depois e o Xbox era um monstro. Tenho ambas versões, mas o GD ROM do meu Dreamcast estragou :( creio ser o motor que gira o disco.
tive 3 Dreamcast, todos deram o mesmo problema, basta achar um motorzinho de 5.9V e trocar q volta ao normal. A unica dificuldade é deixar 100% nivelado eixo e centralizado, plano.
Have GDEMU + POUND HDMI. Then you can run games with Micro SD and connect Dreamcast via HDMI.
@@allanssc Valeu, eu quero arrumar. É ruim ver ele parado.
@@dima1c454 yes, thank you. GD emu is interresting.
Dreamcast ta até mais bonita
Great game, I usually played as Ayane - my favorite character in the game.
Even just the massive leap from the first to the second game is impressive, I can't imagine how blown away people who played the original in arcades or on Saturn were when they got DOA2 on XBOX
This video is wonderful.
Os dois são lindíssimos. Só consigo chegar às essa conclusão
Oh hell yeah my favorite fighting game.! This game made me a man!!.....cause it taught me how to fight obviously.
Fantastic comparison!
In essence it's the same game, but I don't know why I prefer the simplicity of the Dreamcast... Those colors, the old arcade spirit, but above all that it was the first one I met.
Esta es la prueba de que DREAMCAST pudo haber aguantado una guerra de consolas contra PS2 y X BOX sin problema alguno. Lastima de SEGA y las compañías que se rajaron y lo dejaron morir. Aún así es mi segunda consola favorita sólo por detrás del SNES.
Dreamcast versions of games have almost systematically outperformed their Ps2 counterpart visually. A lot of people assume that this is due to poor ports and little care given to the Ps2 version of games, but this is demonstrably not true, in fact the opposite is true. Most Ps2 ports benefitted from extra care and attention from the developer, with many visual and gameplay features added and refined.
Furthermore, there was understandably a great incentive in making the Ps2 version of games the best available since it had by far the largest player base. The Dreamcast games were often rushed out the door and under featured (F355 challenge even lacked a full replay mode) . Dead or alive 2 on PS2 for instance sported new levels, many more costumes, new visual effects, and still managed to look inferior to the DC version overall. Same story for Le mans 24, Ecco, and many more.
The reality of the situation is that the Dreamcast had genuine Hardware advantages relative to the PS2 like a much larger video memory pool combined with VQ texture compression. I am hopeful that one day, various source codes of PS2 games such as Virtua fighter 4 and MGS2 will leak and will be successfully ported on Dreamcast with results that I am sure will surprise more than one.
I didn't know the Xbox DOA2 was so much better graphics. Couldn't remember. That being said, too bad the colors are so muted in comparison, that's the only thing holding it back.
Gotta remember the dreamcast version is from 1996 it's way older version.
I liked both versions, and what an scene we have at 1:53, LOL
Looks about the same. But the Dreamcast version much brighter and active with it's backgrounds I'd say Dreamcast takes this. Since it was designed arcade perfect for game's like these
This is one of those timeless looking games like Virtua Fighter 2 (basically any Virtua Fighter, part 4 is my favorite graphically. Especially on the Naomi 2).
How can you say they look about thr same? You may like the aesthetic of the DC version more but the graphics are massively improved on the Xbox. The shaders, models, lighting etc
Although graphics are radically different, the experience remains the same, which is an awesome feat for dreamcast...
in just a mere 4 years, they advanced graphics THAT much it's crazy.
Now we live in an age where in 5 YEARS or 7 years we barely see much of a change... sigh
Não tem como comparar um Xbox com nenhum console daquela geração. Em um jogo o outro dependendo da produtora os outros console se destacavam mais, porém o Xbox na sua maioria era superior graficamente. Xbox praticamente era um mini PC em uma carcaça de console.
Eu achava as lutadoras do Rumble Rose no meu PS2 incrivelmente bonitas, mas depois que joguei num Xbox dum amigo, nunca mais joguei a de Play2. :'-(
The dreamcast version is basically a 1998 arcade game converted in 1999. Impressive by its own and it aged like fine wine.
I wonder if the xbox release is using the DOA3 engine.
I think I like the Xbox version a little bit more solely on the fact that they gave Ryu Hayabusa his look from the Ninja Gaiden games that came for the XBOX around that time.
Both versions are very impressive for their respective hardware though.
Man... I miss playing this online...it was either halo2 or doau2 back then.
2001 y se ve como un juego actual, increible lo de la xbox
What I like about the Xbox version is the way their eyes look. Especially Ayane and Hayabusa eyes and faces.
What I don't like is how blurry Tengu's stage gets.
DC was always an amazing game for it's time, but it's a shame that most comparisons use this rather then the Naomi ver, which not only has a vast upgrade over textures, but people have noticed the controls aren't sluggish by comparison.
I'd say due to that, the DC was struggling to maintain it's level of detail at 60fps, where if the Naomi ver were a straight port to XBOX, there would only be room for upgrading.
The remake is quite the overhaul, but it's clearly different overall.
The xbox version is just perfect
Dam.......i enjoy the fight mechanics
I'll go for the xbox when i discover
Dead or alive love these graphics
Sensacional! Do Dreamcast é muito bacana mas a do Xbox Clássico é muito superior, tenho o DOA 2 Ultimate pro Xbox Clássico.
As cores da versão Dreamcast tem mais saturação, iluminação também curti.
No Xbox texturas melhores, modelagem nos personagens e nos cenários mudaram um pouco, ângulos de câmeras também.
Tou indeciso qual o melhor! Hehe
Dreamcast achei mais bonita
Per vertex vs. per pixel lighting. It's subtle, but the difference is there.
So Kasumi is 17 and Ayane is 16 but in the American versions their ages are not available due to something like youth protection.
Dreamcast of course! Xbox was a great videoconsole, but Dreamcast was better
I truly wish DOA 2 Ultimate was just a port of the Dreamcast version, akin to DOA1 Ultimate being a port of the Sega Saturn version of DOA1.
Yeah, the additions of DOA2 U were nice, but something about DOA2 of Dreamcast feels nicer.
(But also they needed the game to be online. Oh well.)
I've notice that DOA Had this Half-Anime look, but Slowly turned Realistic as New Graphics Engine were introduce.
You know, although the lighting and snow effects are probably a bit more realistic on XBox, I think the Dreamcast version actually looks superior. Those bright, vibrant colors really pop out and make it the prettier game.
I tend to agree with a lot of the other commenters that even though the Xbox version is technically superior I feel that the presentation of the Dreamcast version is just nicer, has more pop, and is generally more pleasant. There are a couple scenes where I think the Xbox is an improved design but maybe I’m biased because I grew up with the Dreamcast Version first. It is offputting to me to watch the Xbox version. The Xbox version almost looks generic despite the extra detail. For example there is the one outfit difference where on the Dreamcast she has that gigantic pink bow on her back and the other one is a more muted outfit. That giant pink bow is going to have a visual impact and remain in my memory a lot more than that generic costume on the Xbox version. I really like both consoles but for me and what I like Dreamcast wins. I’d be curious if they played any different.
its bias. i'm used to the xbox version and the dreamcast version looks like a demake of it. it's not better at all.
about outfits, ayane has 14 outfits on xbox. including that one on the dreamcast. the computer picks one at random
@@GraveUypo
The Xbox version is superior in every possible way, but you know, haters and all.
Not haters just biased and nastalgic towards the DC
Sempre gostei da SEGA, mais se loco Fanboy da Sega é foda, os caras forçam de mais 🤦🏻♂️😅, o cara pra falar que esse jogo é mais bonito e é Dreamcast Wins precisa urgentemente fazer um exame de vista, PQP o jogo está em outro nível no Xbox Clássico que era um monstro para sua geração, não tem nem comparação, Xbox Clássico ganhou fácil essa !!!...
Concordo com vc, até um cego sabe que a versão do Xbox é muito melhor.
The characters look a bit Less "anime" in the Xbox version
I was thinking the same thing but I said japenese and not annime
I said the same thing. They look much more realistic.
昔で例えるなら、
ドリームキャスト版は 家庭用ゲーム機
xbox版は アーケードですね
Dreamcast wins
I always wondered why they replaced Sakura Tange (Kasumi's original VA) in 3.
The True Bro glad they did personally
. Houko Kuwashima still voices her today afterall
I had the Dreamcast version I dont know how I was playing this game with that controller. I think I updated the controller to Mad Catz controller that has a better D-Pad but the Dreamcast just gives me a good Nostalgic feeling. The Xbox version just has some visual update but Dead or Alive 4 looks better
The DC Version is 5 years older! Respect, Dreamcast!!!
Why when I always see the comments everyone is saying how good the SEGA's version is, I think now Xbox wins
ι dση'т cαяε it is much better no limitations
No PS2 blur filtering on this one.
Excellente video 💎amigo👏👏👏🙂👍, sabes... al principio de seleccionar personajes, En Dreamcast,. No desactivaste el Quick selector, Para activar el efecto 3D, significa que al momento de escojer personaje, hace la misma animacion que en la Xbox, cuando selecionas dicho peleador, un punto que Dreamcast tiene tambien👍, yo lo tengo asi en mi Dreamcast, saludos 👋👋👋🙃
Glad DOA 2U and DOA1 can be playable on xbox one and series x.
With the effects and extra enhancements from the DOA3 engine, the Xbox version of DOA2 looks great but I do like the more anime looking features and character lighting in the DC version. Overall, both version are pretty great and stack up against each other.
For some reason I like the DC version better, the cinema is better and the colors are better.
Because you're a Sega fan
@@ericb914 YEEEAAAHHH!!! 😎
Maybe it could be the output that made the xbox version washed out. You can see that there are more polygons were pushed on the xbox however bad output could result in an unfavorable outcome.
@@ericb914 To make it clear, if you bought DoA2 on Dreamcast release it had awesome graphics, if you bought it day 1 on Xbox it was like, yeah, a bit better graphics, whatever. It was good on XBox but would have been mindblowing on dc if not Soul Calibur and Power Stone existed previous. Not to get it wrong, DoA2 at that time looked awesome and slightly better than Soul Calibur but Soul Calibur raised a standard and the artstyle was more impressiv. In comparission DoA2 improved Soul Calibur the same amount like DoA ultimate compared to AoA2 on DC, a bit, slightly.
That was the case for many different games. The Dreamcast version would almost always end up being more vivid, brighter colors.
Dreamcast version all the way. That game made me buy the console, it was amazing at the time.
Xbox had online play. Xbox version was vastly superior with Hitomi as a playable character. Had much fun with this game.
@@jackburton6239 your opinion
@@LeoDynasty95
I agree with his opinion; the Xbox version just had a lot more going for it.
gingataisen ok
gingataisen to me I like the sega better plus it seem like it had more modes on the sega
The colors are so oversaturated in the Dreamcast version.
The Dreamcast version is "vibrant". The colours were meant to pop in order to grab the player's attention. The Xbox version is clearly superior on a technical level but the more realistic colour scheme kind of goes against the original game's aesthetic.
@@LukeMM95 not really, the colors are like that because the lighting sucks and the characters don't sit well in the scenery. gotta remember that the same team made both games. if they made the xbox version when they had more power available, it was obviously what they intended from the start.
Dreamcast had a lot less slowdown. Definitely a more consistent framerate.
You're right amigo! ✌😊
Depois faz um vídeo da Série Baseball 2k2, que saiu para Dreamcast e Xbox Clássico...
as good as the dreamcast version looks, the xbox version looks a generation newer
To be fair, the Xbox version came out 5 years later, the DC was technically the weakest console of the generation being the first one out and Xbox was the strongest and latest one. Also, the head of Sega helped build the Xbox as well.
Dreamcast more colors. Looks more
Animated. Great version. Better compare Dreamcast vs ps2
Ps2 💩😂
The XBox version is on another level. Easy as that. The Game still looks so sexy.