As I understand it, investigation of the Starliner capsule after landing showed that the cooling system for the capsul failed and the heat build up in the capsule on re-entry got high enough to possibly injure or kill the Astronauts had they been aboard. This report has been held up and not widely released because the capsule landed successfully, but the possiblity of the Astronauts being injured or killed had they been aboard has seemed to fade into the background noise. I also would like to point out that unlike SpaceX, the FAA has NOT wreaked havoc upon Boeing with multiple demands for penalties and fines and multiple investigations overseen by the FAA before another launch license coulf be issued to them? Funny huh?
No, it didn't. No clue where you got this from except the wishful thinking of people who just want Boeing to fail. The FAA did not license any Starliner mission and therefore cannot fine Boeing for them.
Your click bait title is pathetic. EVERYONE knows that Falcon 9 is not in any trouble. So a de-orbit burn isn't quite right. They will study it, and fix it. Period.
You rightfully downplay this incident and in your opinion, "this is one of least serious mistakes Space X can make", yet you claim they are in BIG trouble! What BIG trouble?! STOP WITH THE CLICK BAIT! Shame on you for resorting to this crap.
Sometimes spending an hour to explain a simple thing is too much. Most of the time getting to the point is a good thing. I avoid clicking on your videos at times because many times I can never find out what your title is talking about. If someone could post a time of where he covers the title it would be appreciated.
Ok, I’m taking a stand against clickbait. I will no longer be viewing your videos and I’m going to click “do not recommend” it’s time for TH-camrs to start being realistic and start taking their job seriously.
Key words: finished the mission as intended. So if SpaceX had said nothing the FAA would probably be none the wiser. So once again they punish SpaceX for doing the right thing? What planet did these people come from? Great video 👍
This channel does an exceptional job. I remember running across it a few months ago and I thought it was one of the many bot channels regarding SpaceX/Elon Musk but was surprised it gave up to the date, good info, that was targeted and concise and in-line with what the title was. I think I even told them that their channel name and insignia wasn't a good idea because it looks like a bot channel and people who don't know will just dismiss it. Finally, it puts out a crazy amount of (still quality) content - it seems it's every day even. Just want to give you prop's, man, A.I. voice or not, the information is up to the minute, well researched, in-depth and relevant and that has not gone unnoticed. Ps. I did notice the bad title today though and I hope you don't go down that road. Your audience are intelligent people who are repulsed by click-bait
SpaceX has been making changes to the 2nd stage so it burns up more completely during deorbit....so it might need a little 'fine tuning' to work exactly as desired. They don't need the FAA grounding them for every little thing that might go wrong and will find and fix the issue without them.
You're thinking of the Dragon trunk, not the second stage of Falcon 9. There is no reason either of them should land outside the hazard area; that is a safety concern.
O.K. lets take apart this report, yes the title is click bait, that sucks, but lets look at what happened second stage landed outside landing zone. Any damage or threats to humans i.e., cities no, then we have soot being blown wrong way and Dragon needed a little bath, NASA reporting coolant leak but what do you hear they fixed the problem by themselves, no need to do months of testing for the problem. Hey Boeing see how it is done, when the one booster leg broke during landing remeber how many flights it had under its belt. I would tell the FAA see how its done now catch up!
Might be some bad actors from the inside, SpaceX is usually very reliable, but these incidents are happening way too often to just be coincidence. But that's just me thinking too hard about it.
The point of view is each time that Elon musk is doing very greatful of all thingss Jeff bazso always has to slow the the process for Jeff I mean Elon musk Jeff is always trying to ruin to ruin him from day one stealing his plans he will never make a better rocket nobody cannot copy of his work from Elon musk Jeff bezos always trying to be jealous of him at all times
@@Slick-LikeTheJelly It has nothing to do with anything so simplistic. It has to do with the expenditure of public money paid to private companies. It also touches on how much information they make public on technical matters and to a lesser degree about how the companies make decisions when it comes to work with government agencies and how policy is decided, when and by whom. The public laps up a few words from well-known people, but when and if you start asking more technical questions, suddenly kindergarten-level information is all you'll get. Some of what Space X dishes out to the public should come with a bib and pacifier. In the days of Apollo, we used to get press kits and other material that covered hundreds of pages for every mission, covering the crew the spacecraft and almost any technical detail you can think about. Now you get a few slick pages of one PDF file written and presented at a grade school level. It is two ounces of information when there should be two pounds of information. How many layers of corporate "skirts" can a company doing something so public hide behind? And yes, I'd ask the same about Boeing and Starliner as I do for Space X or any other major provider or contractor working on a manned space flight program including NASA. But Boeing and Space X are not subject to FOIA or many other forms of public scrutiny.
@@Slick-LikeTheJelly Please, please, please read a Shuttle mission report or something. They are excellent summaries of missions and document every minor anomaly. We simply do not get that kind of report from private companies.
@@Slick-LikeTheJelly Anomaly doesn't just mean something that causes a mission failure. It would be rare for a mission to have no anomalies whatsoever. Look up a Shuttle mission report: they go into detail about how each system performed, any problems that didn't affect the overall mission because of redundancy or because it's not a required system, etc. SpaceX gives a brief summary of mission-ending anomalies only and typically provides little information about them (again, compared to what an engineering summary would be).
As I understand it, investigation of the Starliner capsule after landing showed that the cooling system for the capsul failed and the heat build up in the capsule on re-entry got high enough to possibly injure or kill the Astronauts had they been aboard. This report has been held up and not widely released because the capsule landed successfully, but the possiblity of the Astronauts being injured or killed had they been aboard has seemed to fade into the background noise. I also would like to point out that unlike SpaceX, the FAA has NOT wreaked havoc upon Boeing with multiple demands for penalties and fines and multiple investigations overseen by the FAA before another launch license coulf be issued to them? Funny huh?
No, it didn't. No clue where you got this from except the wishful thinking of people who just want Boeing to fail.
The FAA did not license any Starliner mission and therefore cannot fine Boeing for them.
😅😅
Your click bait title is pathetic. EVERYONE knows that Falcon 9 is not in any trouble. So a de-orbit burn isn't quite right. They will study it, and fix it. Period.
You rightfully downplay this incident and in your opinion, "this is one of least serious mistakes Space X can make", yet you claim they are in BIG trouble! What BIG trouble?!
STOP WITH THE CLICK BAIT! Shame on you for resorting to this crap.
That what`s remarkable about spaceX transparency and integrity , qualities that pay back in the long run. Also the FAA is very transparent at sucking.
Hi, i clicked on this because of the title. "Big Trouble" is clickbait in my view and does not represent your video content well.
Thanks for the warning
Sometimes spending an hour to explain a simple thing is too much. Most of the time getting to the point is a good thing. I avoid clicking on your videos at times because many times I can never find out what your title is talking about. If someone could post a time of where he covers the title it would be appreciated.
Ok, I’m taking a stand against clickbait. I will no longer be viewing your videos and I’m going to click “do not recommend” it’s time for TH-camrs to start being realistic and start taking their job seriously.
An off-nominal burn is not serious trouble. Clickbait title.
Big Trouble? I think not. It's probably a control unit again.
Big trouble? Really?
Always have to be a little click, bait
every single mistake is big trouble now. FAA is retaliating
oh just a little
Key words: finished the mission as intended. So if SpaceX had said nothing the FAA would probably be none the wiser. So once again they punish SpaceX for doing the right thing? What planet did these people come from? Great video 👍
@@XCX237 Venus
So sick of click bait. Unsub!
This channel does an exceptional job. I remember running across it a few months ago and I thought it was one of the many bot channels regarding SpaceX/Elon Musk but was surprised it gave up to the date, good info, that was targeted and concise and in-line with what the title was. I think I even told them that their channel name and insignia wasn't a good idea because it looks like a bot channel and people who don't know will just dismiss it. Finally, it puts out a crazy amount of (still quality) content - it seems it's every day even.
Just want to give you prop's, man, A.I. voice or not, the information is up to the minute, well researched, in-depth and relevant and that has not gone unnoticed.
Ps. I did notice the bad title today though and I hope you don't go down that road. Your audience are intelligent people who are repulsed by click-bait
Thank you for your compliment! our team will always try and improve every day! please support us!
Have a nice day!
SpaceX has been making changes to the 2nd stage so it burns up more completely during deorbit....so it might need a little 'fine tuning' to work exactly as desired. They don't need the FAA grounding them for every little thing that might go wrong and will find and fix the issue without them.
You're thinking of the Dragon trunk, not the second stage of Falcon 9. There is no reason either of them should land outside the hazard area; that is a safety concern.
O.K. lets take apart this report, yes the title is click bait, that sucks, but lets look at what happened second stage landed outside landing zone. Any damage or threats to humans i.e., cities no, then we have soot being blown wrong way and Dragon needed a little bath, NASA reporting coolant leak but what do you hear they fixed the problem by themselves, no need to do months of testing for the problem. Hey Boeing see how it is done, when the one booster leg broke during landing remeber how many flights it had under its belt.
I would tell the FAA see how its done now catch up!
There’s just too much material available on this subject to be wasting my time with dishonest contributors 5:21 . I will not be coming back.
Still way too much click bait.
During the launch of the last manned rocket, the second stage looked as if it had a leak. Check the video during the second stage burn.
The engine bell was also vibrating strangely.
One thing Elon Musk isn't is a philanthropist
I thought I was the only one that noticed that, see it i was like OMG is nobody going to say anything about the part still burning
You have a great eyes my friend
I'm sorry but who cares.. Sounds like clickbait for a very small problem
Knowing the FAA, they'll use this as a way to ground SpaceX for longer. Who knows at this point.
I love the images shown in this video. Thank you!
Is SpaceX buying rocket parts from Boeing now?
Might be some bad actors from the inside, SpaceX is usually very reliable, but these incidents are happening way too often to just be coincidence. But that's just me thinking too hard about it.
🤣
MEGA Click bait
Collecting checks from the FAA and Boeing, I see.
Big trouble? Get a grip. Id hate to be in your car if you run out of gas, what would that be an international incident?
It also caused further launches to be postponed.
Blame it to Jeff bazso all his doing to remove SpaceX out of the way 😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮😮
Jeff is running slowly behind SpaceX and Elon
The point of view is each time that Elon musk is doing very greatful of all thingss Jeff bazso always has to slow the the process for Jeff I mean Elon musk Jeff is always trying to ruin to ruin him from day one stealing his plans he will never make a better rocket nobody cannot copy of his work from Elon musk Jeff bezos always trying to be jealous of him at all times
It's that old saying if at first you don't succeed CHEAT! Or do everything you can to slow down the guy running rings around you.
No big trouble .not an issue with public safety ,it landed in middle of ocean.
I think it s normal Problems happen of you launche so often
A Russian went on the rocket? Kamala will not be happy about that Elon. BTW, title "Big Trouble", video, not a big deal?
What an oddly unsatisfying video. click click click
A lot of waffle and regurgecating old stuff. Click gate used to waste ones time.
Your click bait title sucks! You have just lost all credibility.
Go SpaceX Go 💪💪💪😄
Big trouble? Blocking this clickbait, robot voiced channel. Enough of the garbage they add.
Click bait.
No!!!
Thanks!
Besides the title being clickbait, this review seems redundant!
Drama Queen reporting...
Hyperbole much on your title?
Excellent video !!!
SPACEX IS THE WORKHORSE 🐎
Did I hear you say Starliner didn't make it to the ISS, it very much did! 🤔
it didn't make it there the first time.
@patrickmundy1966 Right, I thought they were referring to the last crewed mission, it wasn't clear.
01:37:If you think SpaceX has been anything close to "transparent," I am compelled to challenge your understanding and application of the term.
Yet they talk about the issues and what has happened. Don't be a hater.
@@Slick-LikeTheJelly It has nothing to do with anything so simplistic. It has to do with the expenditure of public money paid to private companies. It also touches on how much information they make public on technical matters and to a lesser degree about how the companies make decisions when it comes to work with government agencies and how policy is decided, when and by whom. The public laps up a few words from well-known people, but when and if you start asking more technical questions, suddenly kindergarten-level information is all you'll get. Some of what Space X dishes out to the public should come with a bib and pacifier.
In the days of Apollo, we used to get press kits and other material that covered hundreds of pages for every mission, covering the crew the spacecraft and almost any technical detail you can think about. Now you get a few slick pages of one PDF file written and presented at a grade school level. It is two ounces of information when there should be two pounds of information. How many layers of corporate "skirts" can a company doing something so public hide behind? And yes, I'd ask the same about Boeing and Starliner as I do for Space X or any other major provider or contractor working on a manned space flight program including NASA. But Boeing and Space X are not subject to FOIA or many other forms of public scrutiny.
@@Slick-LikeTheJelly Please, please, please read a Shuttle mission report or something. They are excellent summaries of missions and document every minor anomaly. We simply do not get that kind of report from private companies.
@@AmbientMorality SpaceX does the same thing. Every time there's an anomaly, they say something about it.
@@Slick-LikeTheJelly Anomaly doesn't just mean something that causes a mission failure. It would be rare for a mission to have no anomalies whatsoever. Look up a Shuttle mission report: they go into detail about how each system performed, any problems that didn't affect the overall mission because of redundancy or because it's not a required system, etc.
SpaceX gives a brief summary of mission-ending anomalies only and typically provides little information about them (again, compared to what an engineering summary would be).
Tired of the click bait and the inaccurate reporting. Unsubscribing.
4 nomalies? @ 2:57
So, not in big trouble then⁉️ 👎
what a rubbish title
👎👎👎bla, bla, blaaaa
🙄
banned channel..
Click Bate
Everyone needs to report clickbait trash like this.