In the book of Irving M. Copi. Page45. Question number 28. I used simp, Addition and I conjoined both after that I used distribution and De Morgan's. So, after changes it into material implication, instead of finding conjunction in first bracket, it came disjunction. In that case can I still change the first premise into de Morgan's
Thank you sir 👏🏻👏🏻
👍🏻
16:11
Sir, instead of symbolizing immoral as ~M can't we symbolize it as I ?
No
Sir, can you plz suggest, which indian book should I follow for this validity part? Plz help...
I M Copi Symbolic Logic ... I don't know an Indian book
Thank you sir
Please ignore 6:00 to 6:35
How will i contact you. Because I have a question to ask you in rules of replacement
Comment and I will reply.
In the book of Irving M. Copi. Page45. Question number 28. I used simp, Addition and I conjoined both after that I used distribution and De Morgan's. So, after changes it into material implication, instead of finding conjunction in first bracket, it came disjunction. In that case can I still change the first premise into de Morgan's
@@kimitochhawng8336 check here legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/courses/log/answers1.htm
@@SumantaSarathiSharma thank you so much