Thanks to your dedicated lecture, many of my questions have been solved. I also gained some confidence in Pyro Sim. Thank you. I hope you always stay healthy.
Awesome! Love seeing more Karma. Also would be cool to see an updated reel of work you've done over the last few years! Curious to see which sequences of these big movies / shows you did.
I haven't watched it yet, but thank you for providing this tutorial, for beginners. It's quite hard to find good material on what seems to me a complicated first (tho I know for certain this is what it seems to me and not what it is).
Hi, great stuff dude, question, if I may, at about 5:14, "slow down" node, attributes, you are typing a star , space, and v, what is that shape in between looks like a small, upper case A, also, is the "V" lower or upper case. Thank you in advance, CZ
Hi! First of all great tutorial! I do have a question, why do you use microsolvers to change the disturbance and turbulence of the sim instead of using the built in parameters? Is there any difference? Thank you!
Hello The benefit is you can mix different layers of disturbance and turbulence with different scales and amounts, If you can achieve your desired look with just 1 layer, then those Built-in parameters are enough, Of course, it was possible for me to do that in my project too, but I thought it is also good to show you how we can have more layers of those parameters inside the pyro solver!
Hi thank you for the tutorial can you tell me how do you determine the scale of the scene? this flamethrower is few meters big which is way bigger than real-life flamethrower does it affect the pyro simulation and if so what is the best scale for pyro simulations?
Hello The best thing to do is to find some references, without reference it will be hard to find the right scale, And yes, scale is affecting simulation, beside of scale you can also play with simulation’s parameters to match your pyro with the reference Regarding flamethrower, we have done which throws fire more than 20 meters away! I’ve found some references on TH-cam when I was working on this project, here are 2 of them : th-cam.com/video/aPQYK5ZMbWY/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/nuIVE7rh8zs/w-d-xo.html
@@sadjadrabiee in this references if we consider human as 2 meter (6.5 ft )the flames are roughly upto 6-8 meters (3-4 times human height) so why did you select 20 meters for simulation? that was my main question.
@@kapilthakur8800 oh ok, I see There is no reason for that 😅 maybe that’s because of scale of that gun asset, so I kept going to work with that scale !! But yes, usually I’m working in the same scale or i’m gonna scale everything down to 0.1 if it will be a super huge simulation
@@sadjadrabiee Oh don't mind me. Your tutorial was fantastic.. Its more of me being the problem. I'm about a year into learning Houdini and It hasn't gotten any easier. I keep waiting for it to click but it just wont. I can't for the life of me figure out how anyone makes anything in this software. At around the 7 minute mark the tutorial does what all Houdini tutorial do. It goes absolutely crazy with the prepping of assets for proper use because Houdini keeps every individual element of is process sperate and in truly weird places with little to know automation of consolidation elements. There are so many steps to making any single thing in Houdini I find it nearly impossible to troubleshoot anything. When a problem arises (which is always) I couldn't have the slightest idea of where or how things went wrong. And on top of that I'm dyslexic. So coding is absolutely brutal for me. And it seems that Houdini is basically incapable of making anything of substance without a large amount of vex. But again. These are all my problems. Your tutorials are great and I'll keep tuning in regardless of the struggle.
Thanks for the reply Yes, I agreed with you, Your concern was the concern of many other Houdini Artists including me! the learning path of the Houdini is more like a Mountain, At the beginning it is super hard because you are not familiar with its workflow and nodes, But when you arrive at the peak, it will be much easier for you, you could understand the language of the Houdini Which helps you to understand the complex setups of other artists or super advanced tutorials. It happened to me! I also agreed with you about doing everything with VEX is inescapable, But that does not mean for doing everything we need to write a complex VEX code in too many lines! If you be familiar with most of the nodes and also improving the Houdini part of your brain ( ), you can use VEX as a less as possible, and That's what I'm trying to do in my tutorials, I want to show how we can make a complex effect or simulation in the simplest way,🌸🌺
@@sadjadrabiee Thanks for the reply and the encouragement. And i really appreciate the limited VEX lol. Keep on doing your thing and ill keep watching. I got this tutorial completed and it led to some of the best looking fire I've made. It may be a small step but you sure helped me get there.
Incredible work, Sadjad!
That was unexpected! 😅
Really Thanks 🙏
Thanks to your dedicated lecture, many of my questions have been solved. I also gained some confidence in Pyro Sim. Thank you. I hope you always stay healthy.
Thank you, that was one of the best and most to the point demonstration on how to use solaris!
سلام اقای ربیعی.با ارزوی موفقییت روز افزون برای شما.
Awesome! Love seeing more Karma.
Also would be cool to see an updated reel of work you've done over the last few years! Curious to see which sequences of these big movies / shows you did.
Thanks for your comment,
Yes, actually it is in my To Do list,
I would like to update my own Demo Reel with my recent projects which I was involved 🌺
I haven't watched it yet, but thank you for providing this tutorial, for beginners. It's quite hard to find good material on what seems to me a complicated first (tho I know for certain this is what it seems to me and not what it is).
Thanks a million. Amazing and glorious as always.
Thank you Nima ❤️
High quality content as usual, good job!
Much appreciated!
@marvvfx And its free
Lovely Glowy Fire Fx❤
Mate finally 😉 well done
Thanks 😁
Great stuff, thanks for sharing!
Nice tuto man!
Thanks
ممنون آقا سجاد گل و کار بلد..سپاس
خیلی ممنونم 🌺🙏
Thank you so much for sharing!
Good one Bro
Amazing!
Gorgeous ..❤
awesome !
Nice!
Sir amazing work can you make a similar project rendering tutorial for Karma XPU
amazing
Thanks!
Thanks 💖
thank you!
Thank you! Have you used Axiom Solver and if so, would be cool to see how to convert setups like this into one that uses Axiom instead.
the source max sound it be 50-1 because its form 0 to 49 right
thnx alot
Thx❤
Is pyro more preferred than axiom solver?
Hi, great stuff dude, question, if I may, at about 5:14, "slow down" node, attributes, you are typing a star , space, and v, what is that shape in between looks like a small, upper case A, also, is the "V" lower or upper case. Thank you in advance, CZ
Hi! First of all great tutorial! I do have a question, why do you use microsolvers to change the disturbance and turbulence of the sim instead of using the built in parameters? Is there any difference? Thank you!
Hello
The benefit is you can mix different layers of disturbance and turbulence with different scales and amounts,
If you can achieve your desired look with just 1 layer, then those Built-in parameters are enough,
Of course, it was possible for me to do that in my project too, but I thought it is also good to show you how we can have more layers of those parameters inside the pyro solver!
@@sadjadrabiee of course, that makes so much sense. Thank you for the response!
Homie must have a super computer cuz I ran out of ram at frame 80. This simulation makes the voxels inscrease exponentioally. Beware potatoe users.
Hi thank you for the tutorial can you tell me how do you determine the scale of the scene? this flamethrower is few meters big which is way bigger than real-life flamethrower does it affect the pyro simulation and if so what is the best scale for pyro simulations?
Hello
The best thing to do is to find some references, without reference it will be hard to find the right scale,
And yes, scale is affecting simulation, beside of scale you can also play with simulation’s parameters to match your pyro with the reference
Regarding flamethrower, we have done which throws fire more than 20 meters away!
I’ve found some references on TH-cam when I was working on this project, here are 2 of them :
th-cam.com/video/aPQYK5ZMbWY/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/nuIVE7rh8zs/w-d-xo.html
@@sadjadrabiee thank you for your response will definitely try this hope you post more pyro tutorial this is the topic I struggle with most in houdini
@@sadjadrabiee in this references if we consider human as 2 meter (6.5 ft )the flames are roughly upto 6-8 meters (3-4 times human height) so why did you select 20 meters for simulation? that was my main question.
@@kapilthakur8800 oh ok, I see
There is no reason for that 😅 maybe that’s because of scale of that gun asset, so I kept going to work with that scale !!
But yes, usually I’m working in the same scale or i’m gonna scale everything down to 0.1 if it will be a super huge simulation
@@sadjadrabiee ok thank you for your replies helps alot
خواستم بپرسم زبان فارسی این اموزشها موجود نیست؟
all houdini right? no axiom or anything?
That is correct🌺
@@sadjadrabiee thank you sir
Sir how to learn 3D animation plz make videos sir
Are you on discord?
Took exactly 7:15 seconds for this tutorial to fly completely off the rails. This program is ridiculous.
Hello
Would you please explain more ?
@@sadjadrabiee Oh don't mind me. Your tutorial was fantastic.. Its more of me being the problem. I'm about a year into learning Houdini and It hasn't gotten any easier. I keep waiting for it to click but it just wont. I can't for the life of me figure out how anyone makes anything in this software. At around the 7 minute mark the tutorial does what all Houdini tutorial do. It goes absolutely crazy with the prepping of assets for proper use because Houdini keeps every individual element of is process sperate and in truly weird places with little to know automation of consolidation elements. There are so many steps to making any single thing in Houdini I find it nearly impossible to troubleshoot anything. When a problem arises (which is always) I couldn't have the slightest idea of where or how things went wrong. And on top of that I'm dyslexic. So coding is absolutely brutal for me. And it seems that Houdini is basically incapable of making anything of substance without a large amount of vex. But again. These are all my problems. Your tutorials are great and I'll keep tuning in regardless of the struggle.
Thanks for the reply
Yes, I agreed with you,
Your concern was the concern of many other Houdini Artists including me!
the learning path of the Houdini is more like a Mountain, At the beginning it is super hard because you are not familiar with its workflow and nodes, But when you arrive at the peak, it will be much easier for you, you could understand the language of the Houdini Which helps you to understand the complex setups of other artists or super advanced tutorials.
It happened to me!
I also agreed with you about doing everything with VEX is inescapable, But that does not mean for doing everything we need to write a complex VEX code in too many lines!
If you be familiar with most of the nodes and also improving the Houdini part of your brain ( ), you can use VEX as a less as possible,
and That's what I'm trying to do in my tutorials, I want to show how we can make a complex effect or simulation in the simplest way,🌸🌺
@@sadjadrabiee Thanks for the reply and the encouragement. And i really appreciate the limited VEX lol. Keep on doing your thing and ill keep watching. I got this tutorial completed and it led to some of the best looking fire I've made. It may be a small step but you sure helped me get there.
you talk way too fast lmao
but thanks and awesome work!