In my opinion the Leopard looks more aggressive tho. Just look at the sharp edges and the size of that huge montrosity. I even think the PT-91 looks "friendly" cause of all the round parts. lol
Pt91 looks like the T armata Russian tank it has more aggressive look then the leopard to what performability wise The Leopard 2 is probably a bit better but they probably be equal and reliability
@@aminuddin-sama7188 because an storage ammunition system that does not apply separate comparments to blow out panels.but instead is unified with crew compartments,as a result ,when the opponent's shot managed to break through the crew compartment,then the tank was totally destroyed,and the crew inside is roasted in the tank
Somehow the PT-91 looks more sleek and aggressive to me.
Cause the T-72 was designed as an attack tank. The Leopard 2 was supposed to be a defensive tank only to protect Germany.
In my opinion the Leopard looks more aggressive tho. Just look at the sharp edges and the size of that huge montrosity. I even think the PT-91 looks "friendly" cause of all the round parts. lol
The Sound of that Leo is more Dangerous than that PT-91 looks like.
Pt91 looks like the T armata Russian tank it has more aggressive look then the leopard to what performability wise The Leopard 2 is probably a bit better but they probably be equal and reliability
The Great Pendekar
But, if the tank has been shot by shell or atgm the tank can blown up
@@sapphire4549 why
@@aminuddin-sama7188 because an storage ammunition system that does not apply separate comparments to blow out panels.but instead is unified with crew compartments,as a result ,when the opponent's shot managed to break through the crew compartment,then the tank was totally destroyed,and the crew inside is roasted in the tank
@@aminuddin-sama7188 It was like a coffin for its crew in the tank :v
Malaysiall nooob ugly tank
PT - 91 TWARDY TANK 💪💪💪💪