@@semyonsychev5906 Khruschev was a tyrant and a criminal in his past, he was the head of the most brutal gang in the whole ussr and a complete savage, he was like second stalin (with anti-stalinist policies)
@@denessy5446 on the other hand i think he was not completely brutal as after stalin's death he did a de-stalinization policy and tried to make soviet more liberal than before, known as 'khruschev thaw'
@@WM-gf8zm you're using words without knowing their meaning, the USSR wasn't state capitalist. revisionism of marxist-leninist principles began with Stalin, the majority of bolsheviks who fought in the revolution were purged with non-sense accusations, also the corruption in the USSR began during Stalin's era.
@@tommy5456"you are using the words without knowing their meaning" up yours hypocrit, what was it then? Clesrly not DOTP and you surely dont want to argue it was feudal socio economic system. Stalin was old bolshevik.. The first waves came with kosigyns reforms
Not proper feudalistic just a little uuuh goofy with Stalin, Stalin was just a crazy autocrat that had leftism looking like shit, the Nikita would start to gradually rotate the union into liberalism and then Gorvacheb would even work for fucking burguer king
And the battle is going again And the heart is uneasy in the chest And Lenin is young once again And the young October is ahead And Lenin is young once again And the young October is ahead
You want to cleanse corruption from the communist party by demoting, outmaneuvering, and slandering corrupt officials I want to cleanse corruption from the communist party by stealing a nuclear submarine and dropping the sun on Moscow We are not the same
If Sablin poops, I flush If Sablin sneeze, I bless him If Sablin fart, I inhale When Sablin points, I look. When Sablin speaks, I listen When Sablin commands, I obey If Sablin have millions supporter, I'm one of them If Sablin have 5 supporter, I'm one of them If Sablin have 1 supporter, That person is me If Sablin have no supporter, I'm no longer alive If the world is against Sablin, I'm against the whole world Till my last breath, I stand with Sablin
Pros of playing TNO: fuels my undying interest in Cold War Politics, WW2 figure heads in the Nazis and Soviet army, the ideologies of all side, the people behind these ideologies and learning about history by making me interested by the people featured in the mod (Yockey, Rockwell, Werbell, Sablin, Yazov and so much more. Add KR with Huey Long) Cons of playing TNO: Every fucking time I search anything about Nazis, the Waffen-SS or Himmler and I see that fucking Black Sun insigna, guess what I'm thinking. Can't enjoys WW2 games anymore because "OOOOOOH THAT THE THING IN THE GAME". The mod is basically nightmare fuel and has a bad tendency of exaggerating the personalities of a lot of the major character in the mod (see the funni clock guy or Yazov. Not Werbell tho. He's perfect. All hail Ingram Mac-10 Suppressors). And the community is... eeeeh... listen when I go there with a super neutral and objective view of politics, its hard to find people who see the mod as what it is: a game about a fictional Cold War. Not a way to promote any political views or argue them.
I got banned from the tno discord for starting a argument about Israel LOL. I was arguing that Israel should get a focus tree, and this Anti-Zionist Jew got into a argument with me and it was so confusing because he said Israel was bad, WHILE BEING A JEW.
simple. Bro would´ve singlehandedly sailed his destroyer into Moscow on a wave of 241M people to restart the Union and then achieve an international revolution as it should have been from the start.
When Armstrong speech started I have started to imagine Sablin built like Armstrong arguing with some KGB operative that looks like Ocelot/Gurlukovich and Raiden mixed about politics while both of them standing on destroyer deck
Im shocked how you only have 1.54K subscribers, you deserve at least 200K, the fact your videos only have 1K-5K views is astonishing, as your quality and content is so amazing, you are truley a hidden gem of youtube
Wow, that last letter. Really hit me in the feels. He was right too, history judged him as a good man who lived in a corrupt system and gave his life trying to change it.
If only he was alive during the collapse of the soviet union things could have went differently. When the USSR dissolved most people regretted it due to how things got worse, so had he been around then he could have actually achieved his dream.
He is not stupid at all, i highly doubt that he didnt know what he was doing, revolutionary suicide is not uncommon in communists who truly know it and fight for it.
China has Maoists who are highly critical of the CCP and the capitalism it has adopted, which has widened the gap between the rich and poor. The soviet union had sablin.
@@The_United_States_Of_America76 No I want to point out that left leaning ideologies always collapse into splinter groups squabbling over how Marxism should be implemented often resulting in bloodshed. Marx's are so stupid and vague in its wording, you can't even find the right people to implement it properly.
Lenin:"Ungern your not the last khan pls" Urgern:"Би бол Бурханы шийтгэл. Хэрвээ чи том нүгэл үйлдээгүй бол Бурхан над шиг шийтгэлийг чам дээр илгээхгүй байсан"
Great video on the guy, but the analysis on what lead the USSR to be criticised by sablin seems to be a bit off. After Nikota Krushchev's coup, the USSR took a hard turn right. They made efforts to rehabilitate figures that had been deported or purged, and the only real thing that remained from Stalin by the time brezhnev rolled around was one of his last statements to the party: that class strugle had come to an end in Russia. The revisionists ran with this and used it to justify economic and political reforms, turn the Eastern Block into a colony and become extremely agressive against other socialist states, namely China, Romania and Albania. It's a very clear contrast, really. While, under stalin, the transformation of comune leaders into owners was often met with death, deportation or expulsion from the party, that came to be praised and incentivised under krushchev. While, under stalin, the centralised economy focused on heavy industry, which was the bare minimum to bring an end to the history of famines in russia, later leaders aimed at creating a consumption based economy. It becomes even clearer when you compare Stalin-era policies about the revolution in china with revisionist policies about the revolution in Cuba. One sought to genuinely help a people reach it's liberty, and showed no intent of being paid back. The other tried financing the creation of a nation-sized missile base.
I am no marxist (anarcho communist) but I have read Marx and if you want context: Marx doesn't use "Dictatorship of the proletariat" in the way Lenin and the his followers interpret it. In fact soviet style authoritarian Leftism wasn't even a thing before Lenin. The closest thing was a closed Vanguard party that would incite the revolution but would then surrender to the people. Though even that was not a very common idea with early socialists.
Anarcho-Communist AND Marxist here, Marx used the term to refer to the absolute authority of the proletariat, he says capitalism is a dictatorship of the bourgeoisie because under capitalism, the bourgeois class has the absolute authority
@@erichayes8445 Dictatorship is a dictatorship. In such “dictatorship of proletariat” countries power never belonged to common people. It belonged to dictator. Dictatorship is a dictatorship
@@scandited2763 you are using the term dictatorship wrong, in Marx's view the DOTP is a fully democratic system without state bureaucracy. Without the death penalty, military, or police. Later authoritarians, would use it in the way Lenin meant and even later ones in the way Stalin meant. The term dictatorship is a different term than the one we use now, language evolves, Marx was using the language of 19th century Europe.
but it wasnt it was a degenerate back stab of the people, in socialism the people is supposed to have the power but stalinism was dictatorial as fuck, it also put foremen in factories with absolute power in them. and then it commited a genocide which aint really equality. yes its economic system might have been invthe hands of the government but the government wasnt in the hands of the people.
@@SwedishDrunkard5963 I was talking about socialism, not marxist socialism. How do you put the government in the hands of the people, as you mentioned?
@@randomuser5609 One of the key ideas of socialism is political democracy will always be a sham without workplace democracy. Economic power can always translate itself into political power. In capitalism, the mechanism by which this is achieved is already well known to you. Ayn Rand of all people actually gave the clearest account of it. As for how to put the government in the hands of the people, just like with all major transitions, the precise details will have to be worked out by the people actually performing the task, and it will no doubt have some variance based on a multitude of conditions unique to a given place and time, but I strongly believe it will always involve a lot of deliberative, participatory democracy and, more importantly, a lot of sortitions. Yes, sortitions, the antithesis of "meritocracy," technocracy, and Stalinism.
@@Synerco well then make up something new because in western europe and north america, people have great workplace control. I do not see what you're talking about. Do you want even more control over your workplace? You know, in the end, it is *a* workplace given to you by a stranger who actually owns this workplace and is literally investing into you. By the way, all the social progressive points, ideas and criteria concening stuff like "workplace democracy".. think a bit for a second; I hope you are a friend of big business and monopol economy, because the things you mentioned combined with the costs of a system like a social democracy, there will be less and less individual small and diverse businesses. Small industry will perish. I mean, the best example right now is germany. Take a deep look at their economic development. Small business goes broke and will be bought up by big business due to state regulation and monopol banks And at that point.. after a couple decades when you have your 10 big corporations left..why is it even private? Make it a state owned business instead. You literllay have to replace the CEO with the public. In other words, with the state. Which means a party official as the CEO. Oh and also, that's how you get capitalism (except for the "make it state owned" part) Because it is 2023 and I hope that by now, you should know that capitalism (an anti semitic slur) is not the same as a free market which is what people should be thriving towards. I mean, they naturally do but if your kids go to school learn how to interpret idiots like Hegel and Kant instead of learning economics.. well it's obvious that people don't even know the difference between money and currency. One last thing. If you are reading for example socialist, fascist or marxist stuff, don't fall for the anti-materialist content and don't get caught up in their dialectical bullsh!t. There is a reason why they hide themselves and their words behind other words. If you would know what the intellectual socialists back then defined as democracy and why ulgy footprints like north korea are claiming to be "democratic". You will hate what you will learn. But before all that, learn economics. Please. (I hate math (economics) but I can't escape reality like I did in 7th-9th grade when I was a socialist)
What someone actually speaking about communism and socialism realistically and not just calling it liberal dictatorship? I think your one of the first ive seen haha that annoys me in so many videos supposed political analysts haven't got a clue what socialism or communism is at least back in the 80s they said soviet communism which is more accurate
The soviets were reduced to figureheads just after the Bolshevik coup. In fact, the Kronstadt rebellion was actually a communist uprising that attempted to restore the soviets! King Charles literally (literally literally) exercises far, far, FAR more political power than the soviets ever did in the Soviet Union. The claim that the USSR practiced soviet communism is about as true as the Independent State of Croatia being independent.
@@LumièreRoteFahne i mean it depends... more protected Wikipedia articles are ok because its more likely the facts it says on non-protected pages. but yeah Wikipedia is never the best source
The final letter to his child...what a man.
Bro literally went and sent: "Mr. Khuruchev please step down and let me lead the Soviet Union" and didn't get killed for that, absolute gigachad.
Maybe because the Soviet Union in revisionist times dont be a nightmare country, like they imagine Western Cinema or Reagan era?
I mean yeah, it wasn't
But not immediately and considering he's a political officer? @@semyonsychev5906
never was its just dissident & nazi cope@@semyonsychev5906
@@semyonsychev5906 Khruschev was a tyrant and a criminal in his past, he was the head of the most brutal gang in the whole ussr and a complete savage, he was like second stalin (with anti-stalinist policies)
@@denessy5446 on the other hand i think he was not completely brutal as after stalin's death he did a de-stalinization policy and tried to make soviet more liberal than before, known as 'khruschev thaw'
I can't help but respect his bravery even if his plan was basically doomed from the start.
Imagine if he was alive in ‘91.
Soviet Civil war?
Contenders
The KGB
The Loyalists (loyal to Gorbachev)
The hardline commies
The Republicans
The Sablinites
He could've just held for the long game instead
думаю защищал бы белый дом в 1993
He’d have counter couped the hardline coup
Maybe the Union would still be around
Imagine if every country had a “Sablin” figure when needed
John Brown in the US
Luis Carlos Prestes for Brazil
ours was Gandhi. He was brilliantly successful.
@@aadyapathak sad Sablin wasn't
I think shubash Chandra Bose is more better
Considering how "speaking your mind" ends in Russia, its a miracle he lived past 16.
Poor man. Was to based to live in this world.
silly muppet
USSR: Read marx to become loyal
Sablin: marx says your a feualistic hellhole
not feudalistic, but state capitalist/revisionist.
Khruschevites began it, brezhnevites stagnated it, & gorby ended it.
@@WM-gf8zm you're using words without knowing their meaning, the USSR wasn't state capitalist. revisionism of marxist-leninist principles began with Stalin, the majority of bolsheviks who fought in the revolution were purged with non-sense accusations, also the corruption in the USSR began during Stalin's era.
so true@@tommy5456
@@tommy5456"you are using the words without knowing their meaning" up yours hypocrit, what was it then? Clesrly not DOTP and you surely dont want to argue it was feudal socio economic system.
Stalin was old bolshevik.. The first waves came with kosigyns reforms
Not proper feudalistic just a little uuuh goofy with Stalin, Stalin was just a crazy autocrat that had leftism looking like shit, the Nikita would start to gradually rotate the union into liberalism and then Gorvacheb would even work for fucking burguer king
One of the upsides of TNO is introducing me to really good Russian music
And the battle is going again
And the heart is uneasy in the chest
And Lenin is young once again
And the young October is ahead
And Lenin is young once again
And the young October is ahead
Same but with Shostakovich
The Tetris Tsar has entered the chat.
PARAPAPAPARAPAPAPARAPAPA
Warren Zevon's band joined the concert.
I think his rebellion could have work if he had a nuclear power sub or if he had more conspirators ?
You want to cleanse corruption from the communist party by demoting, outmaneuvering, and slandering corrupt officials
I want to cleanse corruption from the communist party by stealing a nuclear submarine and dropping the sun on Moscow
We are not the same
@@Spartan761 or better yet just wait till you run out of other people's money. took 69 years. North Korea is pretty based tho, full on cult country.
Torres but less insane
He should have asked LTG for a Bbc torpedo
Yeah so threatening to nuke the Soviet Union because the government was corrupted.. Yeah totally not hypocritical on what he had believed in
If Sablin poops, I flush
If Sablin sneeze, I bless him
If Sablin fart, I inhale
When Sablin points, I look.
When Sablin speaks, I listen
When Sablin commands, I obey
If Sablin have millions supporter, I'm one of them
If Sablin have 5 supporter, I'm one of them
If Sablin have 1 supporter, That person is me
If Sablin have no supporter, I'm no longer alive
If the world is against Sablin, I'm against the whole world
Till my last breath, I stand with Sablin
Based is reserved for himmler and his other burgundian systemers
Yep I agree
Based and Buryatiapilled.
Pros of playing TNO: fuels my undying interest in Cold War Politics, WW2 figure heads in the Nazis and Soviet army, the ideologies of all side, the people behind these ideologies and learning about history by making me interested by the people featured in the mod (Yockey, Rockwell, Werbell, Sablin, Yazov and so much more. Add KR with Huey Long)
Cons of playing TNO: Every fucking time I search anything about Nazis, the Waffen-SS or Himmler and I see that fucking Black Sun insigna, guess what I'm thinking. Can't enjoys WW2 games anymore because "OOOOOOH THAT THE THING IN THE GAME". The mod is basically nightmare fuel and has a bad tendency of exaggerating the personalities of a lot of the major character in the mod (see the funni clock guy or Yazov. Not Werbell tho. He's perfect. All hail Ingram Mac-10 Suppressors). And the community is... eeeeh... listen when I go there with a super neutral and objective view of politics, its hard to find people who see the mod as what it is: a game about a fictional Cold War. Not a way to promote any political views or argue them.
Do not make me recall their discord topic. That just made you gonna welp I just want to touch the grass
@@PitunghereTNOschizo100 and bro i live in Quebec, grass is absent half of the year what I can do about it?
@@ThompsonExpress maybe get se social IRL friends instead online
@@Irongaze86 what the fuck is everyone a pedophile now?
I got banned from the tno discord for starting a argument about Israel LOL. I was arguing that Israel should get a focus tree, and this Anti-Zionist Jew got into a argument with me and it was so confusing because he said Israel was bad, WHILE BEING A JEW.
Good video. Now I need an Iron Curtain submod where Sablin's plans suceed
Incredibly Based
Unequivocally Based
unfathomably based
Inconceivably based
based Sablin in both timelines tbh
Huh, I guess he is as wholesome as in TNO
You'd think they'd have more than one eye on the navy after Kronstadt
Well technically he was supposed to be the eye on the navy
@@patriciohe9273Well who was watching him? Seems a big oversight on their part
@@Tronathon242The point was that he was so trustworthy that noone needs to watch him… since he was working for the KGB, but well
Goddam now I wanna know what would have happend if the madlad would have succesed
Thats easy, play tno and choose the the blue focus and the most wholsome based choices.
Based things no doubt
simple. Bro would´ve singlehandedly sailed his destroyer into Moscow on a wave of 241M people to restart the Union and then achieve an international revolution as it should have been from the start.
@@patriciohe9273 out there, there is that perfect timeline
@@patriciohe9273 sadly, We can only imagine what such a would would be like
When Armstrong speech started I have started to imagine Sablin built like Armstrong arguing with some KGB operative that looks like Ocelot/Gurlukovich and Raiden mixed about politics while both of them standing on destroyer deck
This is one of the most based historical figures I’ve ever heard of
Im shocked how you only have 1.54K subscribers, you deserve at least 200K, the fact your videos only have 1K-5K views is astonishing, as your quality and content is so amazing, you are truley a hidden gem of youtube
Agreed
Wow, that last letter. Really hit me in the feels. He was right too, history judged him as a good man who lived in a corrupt system and gave his life trying to change it.
He was an idealist in a realist world
This world is too cruel for him
are you saying his policies or his actions are idealistic?
@@tommy5456 ofc
If only he was alive during the collapse of the soviet union things could have went differently.
When the USSR dissolved most people regretted it due to how things got worse, so had he been around then he could have actually achieved his dream.
sablin in the black october cud haw benn so hopfulll
He is not stupid at all, i highly doubt that he didnt know what he was doing, revolutionary suicide is not uncommon in communists who truly know it and fight for it.
Never change Spartan, my favorite small youtuber
Chad sablin VS virgen yagoda/brezhenev
more like virgin sablin vs virgin yagoda and brezhnev vs chad Tetris Tsar.
The best niche internet micro celeb
Here's a cheer to Comrade Sablin
If he succeeded and reformed the USSR he would have done it so hard that it would make Gorbachev look like Stalin
Uh... You mean he would've make Stalin look like Gorby?
Wholesome Sablin, may you rest in peace
China has Maoists who are highly critical of the CCP and the capitalism it has adopted, which has widened the gap between the rich and poor.
The soviet union had sablin.
you wanna say that capitalism is wrong huh
@@The_United_States_Of_America76
No I want to point out that left leaning ideologies always collapse into splinter groups squabbling over how Marxism should be implemented often resulting in bloodshed.
Marx's are so stupid and vague in its wording, you can't even find the right people to implement it properly.
Maoists are way bad than that
@@The_United_States_Of_America76 It is
@@Den-z8z it is not wrong with enough regulation and union supervisation both classes can exist in peace
Have to say just found your channel and I am in love, keep up the good work man!
You missed the detail where the migs strafed the wrong ship
"We got them, Brezhnev."
*Radio comes in*
"YOU FUCKING IDIOTS!"
Hey its the wholesome blessed man
Hey, can you do a video on the Mad Baron "Roman Von Ungern Sternberg" for a future video?
Keep up the great work.
This
Lenin:"Ungern your not the last khan pls"
Urgern:"Би бол Бурханы шийтгэл. Хэрвээ чи том нүгэл үйлдээгүй бол Бурхан над шиг шийтгэлийг чам дээр илгээхгүй байсан"
Lore of Valery Sablin: Lenin Lives! *stomp stomp* momentum 100
a hero of modern times
And the battle is going on again. And the sun burns warm in our hearts. And Lenin, is so young. The battle is going on again
Reminiscent of John Brown, not totally the same but similar to the end
Valery Sablin will be known to me now as the Russian John Brown.
Great video, hope this channel grow bigger and able to make more quality content.
also...
spoiler for next video?
Local Brazilian man questions government, proceeds to get brutally murdered by government
@@Spartan761 do you know how little that narrowed it down
@@Spartan761 hey can you make video ebaut greatst czechoslovakia singer and tomboy marta kubišova her life priete long bro plss
@@Spartan761 hey can you make video ebaut greatst czechoslovakia singer and tomboy marta kubišova her life priete long bro plss
@@Spartan761 hey can you make video ebaut greatst czechoslovakia singer and tomboy marta kubišova her life priete long bro plss
Man I've been watching your content for a bit now. I love all the little easter eggs and refrenses in your videos. Keep it up man
Love love love your work bro I always look forward to your latest video, and love the unusual subject matter ❤🤘🏻👽
What an innocent idealistic man
Rest in peace comrade, you were a real one
imagine if he could sails his ship to lenigrad successfully
The end of the last letter to his son is his reunification quote in the mentioned schizo mod for the schizo game.
Wholesome Sablin.
I have discovered you today, but man your content is great!
CPSU: Okay we are gonna make everyone read Marx so they support us
Sablin: this Marx guy rocks, why aren’t you all like that?
lol
great video!
Valery Torres, the greatest comrade of the revolution.
wholesome torres
Great video!
Love from China.❤️
Me when TNO:
and Lenin is young again
and the young October is ahead
Got something wrong, Sablin was a staunch Stalinist and I'm pretty sure his favorite book was "The foundations of Leninism" by Josef Stalin
no
@@theleninator5739 all you can say is no
@@moad5771 because is no.
@@theleninator5739 once again all you can say is no with no references or quotes youve provided nothing
@@moad5771 i not deal whit stalinists. (and you guys not have putted a source in the first place so its you that must provide it.)
To the madness of daring
Great video on the guy, but the analysis on what lead the USSR to be criticised by sablin seems to be a bit off. After Nikota Krushchev's coup, the USSR took a hard turn right. They made efforts to rehabilitate figures that had been deported or purged, and the only real thing that remained from Stalin by the time brezhnev rolled around was one of his last statements to the party: that class strugle had come to an end in Russia. The revisionists ran with this and used it to justify economic and political reforms, turn the Eastern Block into a colony and become extremely agressive against other socialist states, namely China, Romania and Albania.
It's a very clear contrast, really. While, under stalin, the transformation of comune leaders into owners was often met with death, deportation or expulsion from the party, that came to be praised and incentivised under krushchev. While, under stalin, the centralised economy focused on heavy industry, which was the bare minimum to bring an end to the history of famines in russia, later leaders aimed at creating a consumption based economy. It becomes even clearer when you compare Stalin-era policies about the revolution in china with revisionist policies about the revolution in Cuba. One sought to genuinely help a people reach it's liberty, and showed no intent of being paid back. The other tried financing the creation of a nation-sized missile base.
Like we say here in the end of the world: "Un tipazo"
He was so fuckin based man...
good video man
Could you cite your sources? specifically the article shown at 6:22, i'd love to read the whole thing for myself
all my homies hate khrushchev
Every true man hates commies.
@@mojewjewjew4420 True that.
@@mojewjewjew4420mfs when they hate communism (they don’t know what that is)
Do you plan on doing C.G.E Mannerheim in the future?
I certainly could do him at some point, yeah
@@Spartan761 hey can you make video ebaut greatst czechoslovakia singer and tomboy marta kubišova her life priete long bro plss
@@Spartan761 hey can you make video ebaut greatst czechoslovakia singer and tomboy marta kubišova her life priete long bro plss
That is literally the only time where im going to say rhis word. But fuck this. He was BASED.
"why do breadlines have to exist in a state where people are supposed to own everything" bro has not read theory
he has read theory.
That's such a cope
based and lenin pilled
4:49 tbh you were never there in the first place.
The balls on this man.
Do Pavelic next
He is what we revolutionists all aspire to be
His ideals are good but he believed in the wrong way to achieve it
(Looks at the title) {HEY WAIT A MINUTE}
{YOU}
{EMPERORS TTS I ASSUME?}
Very educational
It's a shame that I didn't know he was that based.
He's not Vulkan!
TNO is great
Fly High King fly
Omg the wholesome buryat socialist from the famous hearts of iron mod the new order last days of europe
2:41 lol i got that reference
Incredible
Cool dude. But if I you would have to give an example of idealism you would point at Sablin.
real talk sablin kinda handsome
Fourth Russian Revolution, you forgot about revolution of 1905.
When I first saw this video on my sub page I thought Pomen was making another video on him tearing him another new asshole
Yes
such a sigma
I would’ve love to see a more extremist Soviet Union
collectivization was historically voluntary read soviet democracy
Me when I’m retærded:
I dont see any difference between “-ish dictatorship” and “Dictatorship of …”
I am no marxist (anarcho communist) but I have read Marx and if you want context: Marx doesn't use "Dictatorship of the proletariat" in the way Lenin and the his followers interpret it. In fact soviet style authoritarian Leftism wasn't even a thing before Lenin. The closest thing was a closed Vanguard party that would incite the revolution but would then surrender to the people. Though even that was not a very common idea with early socialists.
Anarcho-Communist AND Marxist here, Marx used the term to refer to the absolute authority of the proletariat, he says capitalism is a dictatorship of the bourgeoisie because under capitalism, the bourgeois class has the absolute authority
@@erichayes8445 Dictatorship is a dictatorship. In such “dictatorship of proletariat” countries power never belonged to common people. It belonged to dictator. Dictatorship is a dictatorship
@@scandited2763 you are using the term dictatorship wrong, in Marx's view the DOTP is a fully democratic system without state bureaucracy. Without the death penalty, military, or police. Later authoritarians, would use it in the way Lenin meant and even later ones in the way Stalin meant. The term dictatorship is a different term than the one we use now, language evolves, Marx was using the language of 19th century Europe.
@@erichayes8445 Democratic dictatorship is oxymoron.
Maybe if he was smarter about his coup he could’ve succeeded. I mean, Gadaffi succeeded
WOW
Sources?
No one mentions the tts reference?
So he basically fell for the classic "it's not the real socialism", but I know what it is.
but it wasnt it was a degenerate back stab of the people, in socialism the people is supposed to have the power but stalinism was dictatorial as fuck, it also put foremen in factories with absolute power in them. and then it commited a genocide which aint really equality. yes its economic system might have been invthe hands of the government but the government wasnt in the hands of the people.
@@SwedishDrunkard5963 I was talking about socialism, not marxist socialism. How do you put the government in the hands of the people, as you mentioned?
@@randomuser5609 direct democracy or another democratic system
@@randomuser5609 One of the key ideas of socialism is political democracy will always be a sham without workplace democracy. Economic power can always translate itself into political power. In capitalism, the mechanism by which this is achieved is already well known to you. Ayn Rand of all people actually gave the clearest account of it.
As for how to put the government in the hands of the people, just like with all major transitions, the precise details will have to be worked out by the people actually performing the task, and it will no doubt have some variance based on a multitude of conditions unique to a given place and time, but I strongly believe it will always involve a lot of deliberative, participatory democracy and, more importantly, a lot of sortitions. Yes, sortitions, the antithesis of "meritocracy," technocracy, and Stalinism.
@@Synerco well then make up something new because in western europe and north america, people have great workplace control. I do not see what you're talking about. Do you want even more control over your workplace? You know, in the end, it is *a* workplace given to you by a stranger who actually owns this workplace and is literally investing into you. By the way, all the social progressive points, ideas and criteria concening stuff like "workplace democracy".. think a bit for a second; I hope you are a friend of big business and monopol economy, because the things you mentioned combined with the costs of a system like a social democracy, there will be less and less individual small and diverse businesses. Small industry will perish. I mean, the best example right now is germany. Take a deep look at their economic development. Small business goes broke and will be bought up by big business due to state regulation and monopol banks And at that point.. after a couple decades when you have your 10 big corporations left..why is it even private? Make it a state owned business instead. You literllay have to replace the CEO with the public. In other words, with the state. Which means a party official as the CEO.
Oh and also, that's how you get capitalism (except for the "make it state owned" part) Because it is 2023 and I hope that by now, you should know that capitalism (an anti semitic slur) is not the same as a free market which is what people should be thriving towards. I mean, they naturally do but if your kids go to school learn how to interpret idiots like Hegel and Kant instead of learning economics.. well it's obvious that people don't even know the difference between money and currency.
One last thing. If you are reading for example socialist, fascist or marxist stuff, don't fall for the anti-materialist content and don't get caught up in their dialectical bullsh!t. There is a reason why they hide themselves and their words behind other words. If you would know what the intellectual socialists back then defined as democracy and why ulgy footprints like north korea are claiming to be "democratic". You will hate what you will learn.
But before all that, learn economics. Please.
(I hate math (economics) but I can't escape reality like I did in 7th-9th grade when I was a socialist)
Sablin is so ADHD coded
i mean if you actually learn about communism, what the USSR became makes perfect sense. marx was the first redditor, look up what kind of man he was
Huge balls
I found out about this fella in why the Russian sucks video
TNO REFERENCE?
What someone actually speaking about communism and socialism realistically and not just calling it liberal dictatorship? I think your one of the first ive seen haha that annoys me in so many videos supposed political analysts haven't got a clue what socialism or communism is at least back in the 80s they said soviet communism which is more accurate
The soviets were reduced to figureheads just after the Bolshevik coup. In fact, the Kronstadt rebellion was actually a communist uprising that attempted to restore the soviets! King Charles literally (literally literally) exercises far, far, FAR more political power than the soviets ever did in the Soviet Union. The claim that the USSR practiced soviet communism is about as true as the Independent State of Croatia being independent.
This shit mad cringe, but I fw Sablin
again a channel who just reads wikipedia.
ok?
@@SebastianRoczz Wikipedia is just a really Bad source for stuff Like that.
@@LumièreRoteFahne i mean it depends... more protected Wikipedia articles are ok because its more likely the facts it says on non-protected pages. but yeah Wikipedia is never the best source