Lecture 05 : Taylor Polynomial Taylor Series

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 37

  • @siddharthchampia5674
    @siddharthchampia5674 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    This is quality content indeed. I suggest everyone to share these to your engineering peers. It is so much easy to understand and such well organised. Thank you NPTEL for these lectures. By the way I'm a first year at IIT KHARAGPUR.

  • @angshukNag
    @angshukNag 5 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    This is the best lecture series after somesh Kumar sir .. both of them are by far to my observation the best maths professors IIT has currently

  • @jpshukla1900
    @jpshukla1900 วันที่ผ่านมา

    अपने गणित को अत्यंत सहज रूप में प्रस्तुत किया है अतः मैं आपकी चरण वंदना करता हूं

  • @mukundsrinivasb
    @mukundsrinivasb 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    What are some common examples of functions that cannot be approximated using taylor series??

  • @bojarajan04
    @bojarajan04 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    What is theta? He suddenly introduced it and it ranges from 0 to 1. I can't understand it.. Please anyone help me..( see 15:43)

    • @sanjusingh3408
      @sanjusingh3408 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same problem here also.

    • @ArunKumar-om1xx
      @ArunKumar-om1xx 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That's just general form for represention.. since E ranges from xnot to x, so if you represent in that form means theta, at theta = 0 you get xnot and at theta = 1, you get x, if if in between value then it ranges from xnot to x

    • @mukundsrinivasb
      @mukundsrinivasb 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ArunKumar-om1xx Consider the interval (0,2) , and x is a number in that interval , say 1. 1 can be represented as 0+1. Similarly, any number in the interval can be represented as 0+eta. Where eta lies in the interval (0,2). Now to abstract this idea even more, any number in any interval can be represented this way provided the number (eta) lies in the interval .

    • @ArunKumar-om1xx
      @ArunKumar-om1xx 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mukundsrinivasb in your case, representation of theta is not generic.. if you represent 1 as 0+2*theta, then theta equals to 0.5 and if theta equals to 1, will represent 2

    • @mukundsrinivasb
      @mukundsrinivasb 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ArunKumar-om1xx So, the point i was trying yo make here is any number in that number line spanning from (a,b) can be represented as finite distance from a.

  • @neweraofgazal8644
    @neweraofgazal8644 ปีที่แล้ว

    2:31 5:53 8:20 9:47 12:10 13:52

  • @saipraneeth2432
    @saipraneeth2432 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Super lecture sir

  • @sanjusingh3408
    @sanjusingh3408 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Koi batayega ki (n+1) th derivative of g(xnot)=(n+1)! kaise hua.
    At 10:48

    • @ArunKumar-om1xx
      @ArunKumar-om1xx 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      g'(x) = (n+1) (xnot)^n,
      g"(x) = (n+1)(n)(xnot)^(n-1)
      so n+1 th derivative will be (n+1)(n)(n-1).....1 = (n+1)!

    • @mdasifhassan
      @mdasifhassan 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ArunKumar-om1xx but still it has to be zero when x=x0?

    • @amrutanshumishramishra6056
      @amrutanshumishramishra6056 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mdasifhassan no the term of x will vanish

  • @devangkhetia6197
    @devangkhetia6197 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Can someone give me practice sums for this topic ?
    It's fine ,if u upload any link or PDF

  • @HellYeah-fq3xc
    @HellYeah-fq3xc 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    awesome sir

  • @PandyaShashank
    @PandyaShashank ปีที่แล้ว

    amazing

  • @abhisheksrivastava6410
    @abhisheksrivastava6410 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    g to the power (n+1) at x = x not was (n+1)! . How sir wrote g to the power (n+1) at x =£ equal to (n+1)! ???
    If someone know tell me please.

  • @saurabhsingh-ow7ue
    @saurabhsingh-ow7ue 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thank you sir....

  • @neweraofgazal8644
    @neweraofgazal8644 ปีที่แล้ว

    16:10 17:18 18:00

  • @hardikkamboj3528
    @hardikkamboj3528 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Typo at 8:45,
    **difference

  • @shivangsingh5834
    @shivangsingh5834 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    this guy only explains the variables taken in derivatives would be more fascinating if he had explained how those polynomials has been constructed and that remainder par and that remainder function how did he consider that ? he only speak like a Robot nothing else no enthusiasm in teaching at all