Thanks for the video. If possible, could you do a comparison between the OM-3 and the S9, comparing the shooting experience. Personally I am still rocking the GH5 and S5 for video, but I carry the lumix GX7 as a EDC. Love the pics it produces! But sometimes I use it as a close up camera, paired with a pocket 3, for "emergency interviews" but ofcourse the image from the old 8bit sensor quickly falls apart in a dim lit environment. It's a bummer, for being a "photocentric camera" that they have flip out screen instead of a flip up. With all that said. Which one would you pick? Or would you rather go for something else, 10 bit, flip up, rangefinder style?
@ if value for your dollar is your top priority, why are you looking at micro 4/3rds to begin with? lol. I love my M43 cameras, but I know I get way more bang for my buck from other platforms.
AS i said in my previous comment, you are making the whole of UK proud with your channel, its amazing and very informative, even myself as a photographer i learnt alot, weldone
A great looking camera. I love how infectiously enthusiastic you are in this review while also trying to contextualise the points you're making. One of the best you've done for ages - and I always super enjoy your vlogs. Thank you as always for what you're doing for the photography community.
I pulled out my 51 year-old film OM-1 and it weighs 485 grams, virtually the same as the OM-3 with battery. It also is wide, wider than my digital OM-1. Lack of a hand grip was no problem to us in the past. The camera was cradled with the left hand, and with long, heavy lenses, the left hand supported them. Just a couple days ago, I was thinking, wouldn't it be nice to have built-in digital equivalents of Wratten filters for monochrome, and, lo and behold, the OM-3 has them. Want to shoot landscapes in B&W like Ansel Adams? You have to use Wratten filters. Weather sealing is essential for us who do nature photography, and the best image stabilization in the industry means that I don't carry a tripod. I live in northern Minnesota, and when it's -40, I just tuck the camera with lens inside my parka and am ready to photograph at any time.
Been waiting for OM to release this type of camera for a while. And I’m glad they aren’t just sticking to the birding/nature market. Especially as M43 is perfect for street photography.
In the States the OM-3 is $1999.99 body only. That is a tough sell. As an MFT/OMS fanboy I love the idea of this camera and will most likely pick one up. Wish the price was a bit lower, but given the IP53 weather-sealing, the features, the ergonomics, same battery as the OM-1 and continued support for all existing lenses, I'm sure I'll cave in. MFT and specifically OMS/Olympus gear is just so damn fun to use and the OM-3 has some promising improvements to get creative quickly. I like the art dial from the PEN F and the new CP button. There will always be haters and skeptics but I think the true MTF and OMS daily users will enjoy this camera. It won't replace my OM-1 MII but makes for a good traveling companion. The original PEN-F mirrorless body still commands a price tag of $1300 to $1400 on the used market, so the OM-3, like nearly all previous Olympus and OMS cameras before it, should have a usable shelf life of many, many years. I still use the ten year old OM-D E-M10 MII for street and travel and expect to have as much fun with the OM-3 ten years from now.
Yes, I second everything you said! The initial price is stiff (esp in Canada). But it should come down. I'm astonished at the prices of used PEN-F's out there! Too bad they didn't make a PEN-F Mk II with these specs.
@@BananaCake26 The problem is that the advantages of stacked sensors is not widely known. Sure, it implies that it’s better than “non stacked” sensors. But it’s not something easily relatable like megapixels, etc. Even I wouldn’t be able to explain to someone why they need a stacked sensor.
This is a refreshingly different review from the "sciency" assessments. The joy and enthusiasm of photography is shining through this review. Added to me being a taker of photos and not a scientist, I'm sold. It's a stunning homage to the heyday of celebrity photography, with all the bells and whistles. Great review.
I don’t think there’s anything you you’re unable to get from any other Olympus camera or the camera that you’re already own after all that sensor is older than I am coming up for nine years old really and truly there’s nothing New. Please don’t fall for this this somewhat tiring over enthusiastic presenting star.
Hey there. I own an OM1 MKII and I am more than happy to share nearly all the best bits with the OM3 which is a far sexier and better looking camera. Zero green pangs. I hope this camera brings a lot more love for OM Systems and converts more people, particularly rank amateurs like me, to 4/3. Full sensor, APS-C, MFT all have advantages and disadvantages. Instead of the snobbery, belittling and hot takes, we should all appreciate the simple premise that we all want to enjoy photography in its many different forms. PS. You are a great ambassador for 4/3, photography and life in general.
This OM3 camera release, and your detailed review on the OM1 mkii vs the G9 mkii, are renewing my faith that there are still some hardcore designers and engineers from the Olympus days working at or associated with OM systems. They actually seem to be listening to customer feedback. It's a very good sign from OM systems in my humble opinion.
@ yes, it's not inexpensive, but you seem to get almost all the important bits of an OM1 mkii in a small, stylish, premium body. I really want to get one.
NEED!!!! I was desperately miss my old Olympus gear and was just about to buy a Nikon ZF simply because it is the closest thing to exactly what I’m looking for. But, now, the OM3? THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT I WANT! TAKE MY MONEY!!!!
Yes..I miss my m43 gear as well..bought a ZF last year but just not using it or enjoying it as much. Takes great images but with the lenses I end up carrying too much. The OM3 looks perfect as it is smaller but still has the computational features from my old em1m3, while having the retro form factor I prefer..as well I kiss the 12-100 and other gems ..have some thinking to do..
@@rztrk3311 Yeah, you'll pretty well have to kiss your 12-100 goodbye on this camera, unless you want cramped fingers! This lens is not comfortable even on the E-M5 Mk III/OM-5 with its slight grip.
@@rztrk3311 That’s good to hear! But I notice there’s a big difference once you have to lug a large lens on a small body for an entire trip: it really starts to annoy you! So much so that I bought a G9 to better pair with my 12-100. That large grip makes the lens feel lighter!
Everyone thought Olympus was going to go down like (Sony) Vaio but OM System actually has been making good choices on all fronts! Glad this camera has come out!
The OM-3 is absolutely gorgeous! Will work perfectly in many scenarios for me and I will definitely buy it as soon as possible! Almost perfect! I would like to see a better evf, but it is ok as it is.
This is the first camera I've seen come out in a very long time, that I would like to get. The other cameras are great and all that, not saying there have been no great cameras, but I just haven't felt the same way about them as I do about this. Whenever, some day, I will upgrade, this might be the camera.
I was just questioning myself as to why I follow your channel, and it hit me. It's your enthusiasm. I have used mostly Sony cameras for several years now, ever since they started the full frame mirrorless craze. And yet, I still follow you. Your zest for these cameras makes me want one, even though the price point makes it prohibitive for me. I'm sure your channel will continue to grow, as your zeal makes this Sony guy interested in your great content.
Yes! I’m shooting DSLRs and unlikely will get a MFT soon, however after watching MFN’s videos, I find myself wanting to pick one up. I love the videos on budget cameras and lenses. The portability of a MFT camera is very appealing and this channel is “lovely” for keeping my interest in the system.
To anyone concerned about the output and being m43rds- just look at the output of the PenF. I think the PenF produced amazing fantastic color, probably the best I have seen in m43rds land and this OM-3 will do at least the same if not a hair better. To me that's really good overall. If you are thinking about getting one, don't let the sensor be the consideration unless you really need a lot of low light photography where you need to shoot higher ISO for freezing movement- since you can do static shots at lower ISO thanks to the IBIS.
This is a pretty good-looking and spec'd camera. I'll be looking forward to owning it in 10 years when I can afford it and everybody else is salivating over the latest thing. And in that time it will still be an amazing camera, just like most things from 10 years ago.
Yes, Emily, this is a great new camera! On the other hand for us amateurs that actually splurged to get the OM1 MII, there really is no motivation to move to this camera. The lack of a camera grip is a major negative in my book, though I do love it’s original looks! I used to have an OM1, an OM2 and then an OM4 back in the day! :-) I’m also deep in the learning cycle for the MII and all its capabilities, which I have yet to investigate!
The main issue is that the Olympus OM-3 features an MFT sensor, while the similarly priced Nikon Zf has a FF sensor. Advantage to the Olympus for using the MFT mount, which makes it backwards compatible with a lot of lenses. Other than that, let's see how it performs overall, although I doubt it's gonna truly disappoint in any area.
.. and yet it doesn't. The only real advantage of M43 is the size of lenses (well, some) Sure they could make a 'vintage body' smaller but they haven't. The Nikon Zfc and Fujifilm bodies are smaller and lighter yet have a larger sensor. A real contender would be an OM-10 or OM-5 sized body made with a light metal body like titanium or even a composite alloy... not THAT would be pulling it off.
I wish I could justify spending the money, but that's not a complaint about the price. It's just that my Pen F is still rockin'. I'm 99% sure I will eventually get an OM-3 though. The only thing I wish they'd added was a system for what Lumix calls real time LUTs. The creative dial functions are so awesome, but most people never realized how great they are. I think if it was easy to create and share custom profiles, people would be in awe of the possibilities. I mostly shoot in mono mode, and the mono features on the Pen F (and now this) are amazing... but until you use it, it's hard to realize just how amazing and intuitive they are. Bring up the color wheel. Spin the front dial to choose which color to filter. Spin the rear dial to choose the strength of the filter. You can do it all, on the fly through the viewfinder, while setting up your shot. It's AWESOME. EDIT! The OM System website says you can share those creative dial custom settings. If they made it easy to do, that's very exciting.
They did mention you can create and share them via OM Workspace - their free photo editing software. It wasn't updated yet but hopefully it is now so I can have a tinker when my om3 arrives!
Thanks for a good video MFN; do we know whether the AF performance is identicial in the OM-3 compared to the OM-1.2 for things that move barring the differences in buffer sizes?
Wonderful. I am searching for a compact and every-day-carry alternative to my G9, but without compromises I have do take using a GX9 or something.. and now OM brings this beast! Everything I was looking for!
Here Is a suggestion - It's a little off topic., but you did mention gloves I live in Montana, where shooting is in winter can freeze your fingers. What I do is buy the wool mittens that have finger holes with the top part of the mitten that is flap that can flip back to expose the the fingers. I flip the flap up when I need fine motor control of over my camera button and flip it back when I need to keep my fingers warm. I usually put a glove liner in them, so it works out great for keeping your fingers warm and controlling your camera buttons. Great review. I was a huge fan of the EM - 5, EM-5 MK II. I was extremely disappointed like many other when they made it a "plastic" camera.
No compromises? How about the lower resolution EVF, the single card slot and the reduced burst rate and stabilisation compared to the OM-1? All cameras have compromises of course, but whether these are crucial or not depends on the use case of individuals. I get why someone would get excited over the looks and size of this camera, and if those things are really important then by all means go for it. It certainly is a very capable camera, but for me, the OM-1 is a much better fit, not least because the ergonomics are superior.
I think you're exactly right with your last sentence there, if someone routinely uses longer lenses, or needs a dual SD slot, then the OM1 might be better anyway as it's more comfortable and designed for those purposes. Though for the burst modes it's worth noting that the Pro Capture mode is exactly the same in both cameras, so 20fps with CAF and up to 50 depending on the lens. So losing one or two clicks with the mechanical shutter doesn't seem like too much of a compromise to me personally, as if I definitely wanted to catch something I'd use the faster modes anyway. And again for the EVF - a great EVF is essential for wildlife photography for example- i lived inside my OM1 evf on safari! So that would be miles better for people who mainly shoot that stuff. But for everyday carry use i think there's more of a split between evf and viewfinder so having a slightly less good EVF doesn't bother me. Also... I didn't even realise it was less resolution until today 😂 it looks lovely and is great to use in practice. I think you'd need to literally put you eye to one then the other to really notice
@@MicroFourNerds I wouldn't argue with anything you say, and you make a compelling case for the OM-3. For me, it's not the size of the body that matters, it's the lenses. I regularly use a E-M1X with the same resolution finder, but whether the OM-3's finder is actually better by way of more advanced optics, I am unable to say. While the E-M1X's EVF doesn't hold me back, looking through it is not as pleasant an experience as the EVF on my Nikon Z8, which isn't all that much higher resolution in practice (3.69 million dots). All I know is that the Nikon viewfinder is much better than that of the E-M1X and appears (to my eyes) just as good as the 5.76 million dots of my Leica SL2-S. Thus I am willing to be persuaded that OM Systems has worked some magic with the viewfinder of the OM-3, but I can only assume costs or other constraints stopped them putting the OM-1's EVF in the OM-3.
Today I saw a lot of videos about OM3 in Italian, Spanish, Portuguese and English, I came back here to tell you your video was absolutely the best in town, thanks
@clabart i think in Italy we are not prepared about mft and there is not a big m43 community so the content creators that are main Sony shooters had for first time a mft in their hands (only riflessioni fotografiche has a good reputation in mft italian community)
Thank you for this user review. Very informative and not just dry specs. I am in love with this camera before I even had my hands on it!! I will definitely have one.
Great video! The OM3 looks pretty fantastic. My only complaint is the twisty flippy screen. One that tilts left and right and up and down like the xt5 would have been much better for me. I'll just have to decide if that's a deal breaker. Especially on a camera that's intended more for stills.
I think is a gorgeous looking camera, and the price might seem a little steep at first, but it comes fully feature packed, and the lens selection is great because of the already existing olympus and Panasonic lenses (also the new OM ones). Definitely one to consider if you are looking for a camera that's good at everything. 👌
Its awesome to see OM System continuing the Olympus legacy! This camera will make a lot of people happy for a long lime, as someone who is still using an EM5 mkii and EM1 mkii I can honestly say these cameras are built to last! I don't see the sensor as a limitation, 20mp is plenty for many applications plus the lens eco system for the platform is incredible! Awesome content as always 👍
.... I've just had a worrying thought as an OM-5 user... I really hope the OM-5 range doesn't get dumbed down to make room for the OM-3 😢 - I don't need all the latest and greatest tech in my OM-5s but i really hope they'll keep the weather sealing and generally high quality components (shutters dials etc). I'm scared future OM-5s will be the new EM10s.
Im not in the market for a camera right now, but for me this is an excellent indicator of where om system are taking the brand. 2 or 3 years from now i might be picking up my om3 ii
I'm sorry Tom 😂 I feel your pain. I've been thwacking a few negative people with my Fighty Lobster Energy 🦞 We have a little wholesome corner of the internet here on the whole! Come on in, pull up a chair! Get a hot chocolate
I just watched your video after seeing your comment here. Your video is pretty balanced. I swear there are too many people that have some real m4/3 hate and will not fail to miss a chance to take a swipe at anything positive (or even neutral) whenever possible. Good, fair video btw.
How good is the AF for street? I LOVED LOVED my OG EM5, but sadly, the face detect and tracking just didn't work well, and AF in general wasn't the greatest for street. My Sony A7 mkii is my level of "good AF"...if the OM-3 has that or better, I would happily go back to OM. LOVED the colors in my OG EM5, weather sealing, small primes, etc. for street.
Super snappy for street i can't wait to do more of that with the OM3. Mike Mcgee did a great OM3 review in London with some street photography examples in it
First review I watched! Well done! Initial pricing here in Canada is exactly the same as the OM1 (ll) ($2800) which it seems to close to, but smaller. Star Focus too? Looks lovely and folks have been waiting for a small full featured MFT. Well done OM! A bit too pricey for me, but a wonderful camera!
Yup, $2800 up here in Canada is kinda hard to swallow. OM Systems had a barn burner of a sale on the OM-1 Mk I just last week at $1699--I almost bought one. But it wasn't improvement enough over my G9 to blow that kind of cash.
Sorry to say at £1700 body only in the UK or £2000 with a lens, I think OM Systems have priced it out of most MFT fans, and you get can get a lot more camera on other systems for the same money... Love the look, but think I'll be sticking with my S5ii, and not come back to MFT and OM and keep hold of the OM20 Film camera I have...Such a shame as it seems a nice camera with some nice features..
I agree, I really don't get the flagship price level. It would have been a lot more "approachable" if the price was in between this and the OM5. To me it just smells like they want 1.000 € extra just because it has the 4 year old "new" sensor. But even that seems odd as they have been able to discount the OM-1 MkI to around 1.200 EUR with cashback. Camera is nice and all. The price is a huge turnoff and tells me more about what the company is trying to do than what the camera is all about. Which is shame really.
What's the straight out of camera like? Just to get an idea of what I'm working with. I typically love a camera that just looks print-ready coming from the SD. I love my R8 and the wife's G7XII. This could be an upgrade for her.
I think the issue doesn’t lay in comparison to other OM cameras but to similarly priced cameras from other brands. It’s a very tough sell against Nikon ZF, Fujifilm x-t5 [or even zfc and x-t50]. Like the hi res mode in om-3 is 50mp while the sensor itself in x-t50 is 40mp…and it has IBIS and it has film sims and subject tracking, bigger sensor etc., etc…for like 60% of the price of the OM-3. While keeping similar size too
Exactly my thought. If you like pure image quality, you go with a larger sensor. If you want great IBIS and compact lenses, you go for the OM1 and save a couple of bucks. If you purely want retro design inside the M43 cosmos, the OM5 design might be enough nostalgia.
High res is 50, hand held, 80 on a tripod. If you are considering THIS camera, I expect you have lenses for it. FWIW Lumix G9 II does 100 Mpx hand-held. OM cameras have five and more stops of Live ND, I use that more often than I go to high resolution.
@@iSchrott3G For pure image quality, shoot high resolution. The algorithm largely kills the noise. I saw a test where the reviewer considered it outperformed a Nikon, I forget which.
I had this same thought which is why I can't justify getting this when I have an x-t5. However one thing to consider with the larger sensor is lens sizes. The fuji x primes are all significantly larger and heavier than similar ones on m43. The compact lenses are the main reason I keep my lumix gx85 around since it's sooooo tiny with the 20mm lumix prime.
My first camera was the original OM-D E-M5, and the good looks and all-metal body of the OM-3 make me look back fondly. Now, I have the OM-1 for nature photography and another brand’s (I’m afraid to even say it) camera for most other photography. While this looks like a great camera, I won’t be getting one for a few reasons: I like more megapixels for cropping; I’m one of those people who really enjoys a joystick (Sorry Emily!); and I much prefer a tilty screen to a flippy screen. That said, I’m happy that OM Systems is putting out a new and exciting small camera that takes advantage of the best aspects of M43. The more great cameras that are released, the better it is for every photographer.
The one compromise I can see is only one card slot. Looks like a great camera though! I'm overall quite happy with my OM5. For video it doesn't quite seem at the same level as the G9II or the GH7 but for sure totally usable there as well.
I have to admit that my first thoughts on finally seeing this camera unveiled was, 'so, what?'. But having watched several videos, including yours which is probably the most useful, I can see 'why!'. I'm more likely to think of this as a second body than I was initially.
Brava Emily: a complete review like I've never seen in Italy. The memories of this camera take me back to the 70s, the golden years of Olympus when I photographed with the legendary OM-1 (not mine, I had other brands) that is traced by today's OM-3 Digitale. I saw it yesterday at the store. I would have preferred to have the timing ring rather than that of automatic modes and memory banks for the settings not so much to imitate the OM-1 as for the convenience of setting up quickly with the thumb and index finger of the right hand. A strangeness in your video: the video recording times of over 2 continuous hours without overheating and blocking whose test was carried out in a very northern latitude country in a usually cold season, I don't think that if I had been in the Mediterranean in the summer you would have gotten such a long continuous video recording time.
Yes, in the press release now it's out, it says unlimited recording under 40 degrees C, and up to 40 mins I think over 40 degrees. Might struggle in some climates for sure for long clips! But for smaller bits I think 40 mins in tough heat is really generous. Definitely won't be shooting any outdoor wedding ceremonies with it any time soon though!
i'm looking forward to this camera for my upgrade, it sure look epic, but i think the 2000USD price tag is a bit much, it is not too expensive but too close to OM-1 II i will stick with M43 and i do still want OM-3, but i think i will go for OM-1 II for now and wait for sales on OM-3
For some context OM-1 II's MSRP is 2400USD, but it regularly got discount to 2000 So now OM-3 and OM-1 II is basically at the same price, so you must really want the retro look to not buy the OM-1 II Although I'm sure OM-3 will start to be heavily discount some point in the future, just like most camera brands do, MSRP usually don't stay for that long
My first camera was an OM1MD in 1975 which I still have. It's on my desk. I also have my OM2MD from 1982 and all of my original Zuiko lenses. This looks exciting. I shoot Sony now professionally, but this looks like a great camera for everyday use. Thanks for your amazing content. Always enjoy your sunshine face! Thanks for the work you put in to make these videos great.
No kits either…just body only. And at the price they want for it, it’s more expensive than the ZF, the X100VI and 1.5x the price on the S9 body only. It’s going to be a tough sell
@@patrick8035yes its more expensive than all those cameras, but like with all cameras... My lenses don't fit on any of those bodies. And unless you have a Nikon, no new mirrorless lenses from other manufacturers are going to fit on your camera. This OM3 is factually cheaper than buying a zf and a 50 1.8, the 24-70 f4 and the 100-400 4.5-5.6, which is what I'd need to replicate my current Olympus/Panasonic kit. And yes I'm not just an OM fanboy, this is always the argument no matter what the brand comparison is.
I hate it because this is everything I wanted my OM-5 to be, but at the time the tech hadn't caught up yet and I DESPERATELY needed an upgrade from my GX85. I'm crying for myself, but rejoicing for other M43 users
This camera and an M. Zuiko 12-45 f4 or a Panasonic-Leica 12-35 f2.8 and an Olympus 45 f1.8 or Panasonic 42.5 f1.7 would be an excellent and flexible two lens kit. I'm very pleased with this camera release.
I think that they have produced a brilliant little camera that is true to the ethos of Olympus/ OM Systems portability and useabilty. I had and loved ysing an original Olympus ON1 and this is the closest thing, even better in fact.
I had high hopes for something innovative from OM System. I love their 20mm f/1.4, but at €2000 for just the body, it’s a hard sell, especially when I could grab a new OM1 Mark II for €2085 or a G9II for €1760 right now. I think you didn't mention the OM3's electronic viewfinder. It has the same resolution as my 2017 GH5 and the OM-5. Hopefully the EVF screen is better than those, but it's not ideal for outdoor photography or manual focusing with legacy glass. Also, I doubt the missing joystick is due to engineering challenges. Come on, it's an ergonomic standard these days, and this isn't an entry-level priced camera. I’ll wait a few months to see if Lumix releases something new. If not, I’ll likely upgrade to the G9II once I see it for under €1500. It offers 25MP, a joystick, better EVF resolution, and is a beast for video with impeccable ergonomics. Sure, it's bigger and uglier, but sometimes, function trumps form.
I’m not in the market for a new camera (loving my Canon R7) but the OM3 is a gorgeous camera that, based on your great review, looks like it can do it all! Very cool.
Fellow g9ii owner with absolutely no desire to give the OM-3 more than a few moments thought. Price, features, and form factor all fall short of the mark. It looks nice I guess, but I can only image how tiring it’d be to use with longer lenses.
Back in the day I couldn't afford the original OM1 so had to settle for the FTL which was lost in the 74 floods. Looks like history repeating and I'll stick with my OMD cameras. Although, selling my OMD1ii and my OMD5iii may be replaced with one camera that does it all.....😊
This really made me consider the OM-3 as my next upgrade after skipping the OM-1. But it actually does have some drawbacks: no af joystick, small command buttons (this really annoys me with my E-M5 III), low resolution viewfinder, only 1 card slot. Ergonomics are important, that’s the only reason why I sold my Pen-F years ago.
It's not the form factor I prefer. I'd like to get an OM1 Mii, but having the OM1 Mi I can't justify the expense for the relatively minor upgrade. Here's hoping the continued releases from OM Systems signify their longevity, and they'll develop an OM1 Miii for those of us waiting a few years between upgrading. I'm invested in the M43 system with all my lenses at this point. So I'm hoping for the best. I love the photos you got of the dogs here, Emily. I'm a big softy for the snow/sled dog breeds. Thanks for sharing your enthusiasm! You give me renewed love for photography, reminding me why I love it so much each time I see a new video.
Ohhh…. I think I’m sold. I bought the EM5 iii in 2022 after the OM-5 came out because I didn’t see the value in it. I’ve been loving the EM5iii but wishing for some of the newer features, the Starry AF in particular, and lately looking at the OM-1 but not wanting to compromise on size. This has everything I could want, AND to top it off it looks like the OM-20 I had and loved in the 80s. I don’t think I can resist this one!
Fantastic review, Emily. To complement this, I suggest Thomas Eisl's review too. He has the same overall conclusion, and covers several additional details & insights. You both have such keen judgment, based on a rare depth of understanding. Of course, I look forward to your upcoming video's on the OM-3 to expand my understanding, and Eisl's as well. I'm enamored of the colors and look of your stills and video shots in this review! BTW, "LUTS" (well, custom color and monochrome settings) from the EP-7 can also be shared with the OM-3, via OM Workspace. I'll almost certainly buy this new camera.
I a not throwing it way because of the sensor, but the size. Yup, doesn't seem that small. I was hoping for an EM5.2 size class or OM-5 tops. I value size and this makes me look at Fuji a bit much. Still want to see it in person and check official size.
Emily - on price, let's be honest, the issue is not comparing within m43rds but with competitors like Fuji. Like how much is an X-T5? That kind of thing.
Hi there Josh! I agree with you about the size. Considering all my setup is Lumix S, right now I'm just praying for a GX9 update to have that fun EDC camera✌🏻🙂
Us Pen-F enthusiasts didn't have it box checked here. This is the improper form factor. To me it's pretty obvious what we want, and been asking for it for half a decade plus.
I’m happy they brought out a new camera and with the stacked sensor and better auto focus etc. Looks like it’s got the goods. In my opinion though the only problem I see so far is that these features and sensor should have been in the om5 body as it has the better ergonomics to be the backup body to the om1 mkii or be the smaller full featured body. Just a shame it didn’t get those features.
Aah, my om1.2 is getting a little sister for everyday photos. Thank you for your exciting user experience views that helped me decide on the om1.. I'll be an early adopter of this wee gem, and the 17km2
Thank you, this review made my day. You had me at all metal build quality and phase detect autofocus. I think this will be the win OM systems needs to get back in the game. I think they gave me a reason to really consider upgrading my EM5 mkii (finally not to a plastic body).
@@oneeyedphotographer no I was not aware of that, but I question: would those "large" parts not likely be titanium and ceramic vs. plastic? At least the parts that come in contact with serious heat on re-entry would likely be ceramic. Perhaps other key components (electrical connectors inside the hull) are plastic, but the parts heating up on re-entry? I kind of doubt that. Yes, aluminium (one type of metal) has a low melting point (660 C) vs steel (iron and carbon and chromium for stainless that melts around 1450 C but it's really heavy for flying vehicles), why the Concord jets was made from titanium (melts around 1700 C and light and strong but expensive and hard to work with) since aluminum used on most regular aircraft would age harden and weaken due to air friction at the speeds achieved by the concord, but I'm sure there are parts, maybe even "large" parts on the space shuttle that are made from specialized heat resistant plastic. Just the same I'm happy the OM3's has a magnesium alloy body (melting point 650 C). I'm unsure of the melting point of the engineered plastics on the EM5 mkiii or OM5 but I prefer the look and feel of metal (magnesium alloy), which is why I've kept using my EM5 mkii. I'm sure there are parts inside the OM3 that are high quality plastic as well. Either way I believe the "large plastic parts" on the space craft that take a lot of heat may in fact be ceramic (a totally different material) and that even metal with a low melting point of magnesium alloy or aluminium above 600 C will be sufficient for most photographic applications.
You’d need a crazy fast lens to have the same kind of background blurr as ff which is my biggest reason to not use mft. Otherwise it would be really nice and compact
I'd like to have one. I'll wait a year or so for them to hit the used market. I also want to see what Canon is cooking up with the R7 II. I hear it is going to be top tier.
Hi Emily, a useful review, which answered a lot of questions, many thanks. Unfortunately, although the camera ticks nearly all the boxes as a light compact EDC, the dealbreaker for me is no front grip like the OM5/EM5/EM10. If OM System had used a similar removable grip of the EPL-6, I would already be an OM3 owner! Fingers crossed the OM5 Mkii has subject tracking.
Well, I'm sure there will be a wealth of 3rd party grips out for this camera soon, if OM Systems themselves don't produce one. But yeah, the lack of a grip is a deal breaker for me.
Only saying this because you said you were in a mood to fight :-). In this post I want to address the price issue and what I think could have been done that's still compelling: - OM-5 sensor. This sensor has a reasonable fast refresh even if it's not stacked (Z6iii speed / 60Hz) but should help a lot with that price because not stacked - Do at least same live ND of the EM1Mark III (the OM-5 is one less ND level, so that's an upgrade) - Include the GND ND to the level of the live ND (yes, it can be done, that's a post processing/CPU feature, not sensor bound - if you can do liveND to 5 stops, you can do GND ND to 5 stops) - Yes, keep those PenF color profiles and options - AI AF/improved AF/AI Jpeg engine of OM1/OM3 as it came out - IBIS like what OM-5 already does. Let's mark it at 6 stops if CIPA changed (apparently it did) - Faster HHHR resolve like OM3/OM1 - 14-bit RAW options for HHHR/ tripod HR (this isn't really stacked sensor dependent either) - Same EVF OM3 came out with This would net hopefully a significant lower price, less high electronic shutter FPS (but the OM-5/EM1MKIII already do like what, 20? 30?) Maybe price could be $1500 USD MSRP? Like 1500-1600 Euros? Yes, I do think that while you will always get complainers, this nets you virtually the same level of image quality (we know by now the OM-1 sensor never captured 2 stops better DR or ISO over previous sensor, that was a real class on misinformation by some influencers), with key creator color options. Why does the OM-3 need a stacked sensor? It's almost like maybe they could not buy the OM-5 sensor anymore in bulk or something. The OM-3 is not the kind of camera that needs a stacked sensor. And the OM-5 sensor can already capture at quite a high FPS electronic shutter in general. I really think this would have made it more attractive for someone not invested in m43rds already. As for PenF sized boy 'can't be made weather sealed' - the EM5.2 body *IS* weather sealed and it's quite small. yes, I say it can be done.
About the sensor: Emily I think we need to look at the context. While the sensor itself has been changed, it *feels* like this is the same image quality we're getting with the 2016 Pen-F, which I think was Olympus' first 20 megapixel sensor camera. So while it was unlikely, some of us did hold out that maybe the OM-3 would do what the Pen-F did back in 2016 - a bump in image quality for photographs. I have the OM-1 Mark ii and I love that camera, but hot damn, I can't deny that it takes the same quality of images as the EM1 Mark ii and Pen-F - especially in the ISO 200 to 1600 range. The sensor conversation I find so strange because I think most of the people who say that 20 megapixels is fine, would also be thrilled if they gave us something a bit higher resolution. I get that you're excited about this camera, and that's lovely. But I don't really get who this camera is for. I think if you're a professional, the single card slot is a dealbreaker - at least for me, it is. I had TWO cards corrupt in 2 years, and I'm so thankful I had a backup in the camera. If you're a person who wants to take nice photos of the family and friends and want the retro styling, then $2000 is a lot of money. Forget the cheaper options in Fuji and Nikon for a second, you can get the OM5 or EM5 Mark iii for cheaper - the photos will look the same for the most part. As for the styling, I wish they kept the rangefinder Pen-F look because to me, this just looks like a bigger OM5 for the most part. I dunno. The camera isn't for me. Speaking for myself - I'm okay I guess with the same 20 megapixels, but if they gave me two card slots, Pen-F styling, and a joystick on the back, I would be on board.
The pixel size in full-frame 100mpx sensors is the same as m4/3 at 20mpx. You're not going to get more mpx without a revolutionary sensory that's going to go to a flagship camera first. Maybe they could have tweaked the computational side a bit, but just getting the entire camera into a smaller, cheaper body is already great, and a pretty significant accomplishment. But, sounds like this camera just isn't for you. And imo, that's fine. If the lower price and different ergonomics don't get you excited, don't buy it.
Same resolution, but not the same IQ. My experience from the OM-1 vs the G9 and E-M1.II is the stacked 20MP sensor is better in terms of both noise and DR to the older 20MP non-stacked sensor from the Pen-F.
@@adam_mawz_maas Well, to my eyes, in the 200 to 1600 ISO range using the same lens, photographing the same thing under the exact same lighting conditions, I can't tell the images apart between my OM1-Mark ii, my EM1-Markii, EM1-Markiii, EM5-Markiii, Pen-F, and OM-5. I can't comment on any other cameras. Once I go past ISO 1600 I notice some differences, but I find them minor. More differences in the 6400 and beyond range, but I don't personally like the images in any M43 camera past 3200 anyway. Bit better shadow recovery in post for the newer cams, but...I personally find the differences marginal. I mean, it is what it is. You might be noticing more of a difference than I am within these cameras. Personally, I don't find the image quality to be lacking per say. I'm just saying that for those who ARE disappointed they're not getting a resolution bump, I can appreciate where they're coming from since the IQ has largely been the same for a long time.
Im glad youve found your ideal does everything camera. I guess your future reviews can only criticise the new models. I cant believe so many people commenting here are upgrading just because the camera looks nice, and a little smaller than OM-1ii, even though specs are practically same. What are you people doing that this new camera will do better?
Little camera? hmm it's noticeably bigger and heavier than the OM-5, heavier and longer than the Nikon ZF-c, heavier and bigger than a Fujifim XT50.. not sure about all the fuzz... aside from a metal body (which doesn't mean it's better built or more likely to take a fall) there's not much to it.
I agree with you this is NOT a "little camera." I don't know where Emily gets that honestly. It's bigger than PenF, OM-5, X-E4, X-T50. It's pretty much almost an X-T5 class size. The good news to me is that it seems OM Systems is showing a pulse, and I hope they can do a proper update to the OM-5. Everyone saying "but didn't you guys ask all the time for a compact" - no. We asked fora. PenFII or EM5.2 type body size.
On/Off button on the left, is one of my biggest pet peeves in camera design. I just want to be able to pull the camera out, switch it on and shoot.. without needing my left hand.
Cool camera but $2000 in the US body only is way too much. The OM 1 MkII is $2000 on sale right now. Bad decision there. And there are some compromises. Only shoots 6fps mech shutter. I’ll stick with my Pen F. I really wanted this at $1600 US. I’ll wait for the big price drop in a couple months. Maybe.
@ the Zf and Z6III are two different cameras with the same 24mp but there’s a $500 gap at all times between the two. Also the OM 1 II is the flagship camera. The Zf is $3500 cheaper than the Z9. I’m using this example because I’m sure you’re gonna use the “retro” look as the excuse for the OM3 vs everything else. There’s no excuse for $2000 for this camera. Ever. In any world or universe.
This comment section is funny and majority praise. Clearly the M43 bias is high. I have an OM1 and love it but this $2000 USD price point for the om3 is not it. OM doesnt grow market share with this. Its more $ than a Nikon ZF or Fuji xt50. Just doesnt make sense. Heck its more the same price as an OM1mk2 which is on sale. And you can get a om1mk1 for about $1000. This Looks awesome but MFT already has an image of being lesser than other sensors so convincing people to spend more $ is silly.
I mean lots of people with micro four thirds kits are watching videos about micro four thirds cameras. Bit like saying there's a lot of praise for a Sony camera from people that have Sony systems. It is more expensive that a Zf... But I don't have lenses for a zf. So unless I say I'm going to sell everything, double the sizes of some of my lenses, still spend more money new for new comparison, then yes you could change systems, and you'd take great photos. Just like you can with this camera. Just like I do with my 5Dii and my Eos film camera. Ultimately why buy a Sony A1 when a z8 is cheaper... Well because you've got a million e mount lenses, and you might like Sony
@owenrodgers8020 yes but my Greater point is you don't earn new customers with this approach. OM and more importantly MFT need that. Which in turn helps us MFT fans. More excitement to the system gets more lens and cameras being made. This $2000 price is counter productive. Sure if you own MFT already it's a nice new option but it's not competitive (besides it's looks)
@@owenrodgers8020 The fact that we do own already many MFT lenses does make the OM3 neither cheaper nor better. It is about price/performance ratio. We would all love to see MFT market share to grow. But with these bad management decidons (only 2.36MP EVF & 2000€ body only), you are killing the system. No matter how retro the body looks, no matter how many MFT lenses we already have. Do you really want MFT to disappear?
@@dirk.4711 yup you get it. We need more fans , not catering to only the diminishing MFT crowd. Imagine if they priced this around $1399-1499, it would be flying off the shelves. But tbh it's just "ok" video performance sets it a step below many others
I see this camera addressing four markets: - Existing MFT users. - People who once used and loved a film Olympus OM1 or subsequent model, or a similarly small film SLR from another brand. - FF camera users looking for a smaller, elegant ILC camera that doesn’t make them look too dorky in front of their kids. - The kids if they are into retro gear and can’t get or don’t want a Fuji. The first three categories are dominated by people (mostly men) by men over 40. They generally have access to enough cash to fund expenses hobbies if they put their mind to it.
![โกดำ - วสันต์17 x ไม้เมือง [Official Music]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/OUg2L4Sx1TY/mqdefault.jpg)
Watch next! Here are my thoughts on the video/hybrid side of this camera: th-cam.com/video/LOy5o4uzLrM/w-d-xo.htmlsi=1dokljgzj_7O8jIE
Thanks for the video. If possible, could you do a comparison between the OM-3 and the S9, comparing the shooting experience.
Personally I am still rocking the GH5 and S5 for video, but I carry the lumix GX7 as a EDC. Love the pics it produces! But sometimes I use it as a close up camera, paired with a pocket 3, for "emergency interviews" but ofcourse the image from the old 8bit sensor quickly falls apart in a dim lit environment. It's a bummer, for being a "photocentric camera" that they have flip out screen instead of a flip up.
With all that said. Which one would you pick? Or would you rather go for something else, 10 bit, flip up, rangefinder style?
I’m sure this camera will make a lot of MFT users happy. Your own excitement jumps off the screen. Great to see!
You two and Camera Conspiracies are my top 3 favorite camera channels. Keep up the great work.
@@YouMotorcycle same 😊
Ill stick to my M1X and get the GH7 or the G9 II I do not like this camera. For the price in the states there are better options.
what about the price? Are you happy?
@ if value for your dollar is your top priority, why are you looking at micro 4/3rds to begin with? lol. I love my M43 cameras, but I know I get way more bang for my buck from other platforms.
AS i said in my previous comment, you are making the whole of UK proud with your channel, its amazing and very informative, even myself as a photographer i learnt alot, weldone
The reviews are great. I agree.
A great looking camera. I love how infectiously enthusiastic you are in this review while also trying to contextualise the points you're making. One of the best you've done for ages - and I always super enjoy your vlogs. Thank you as always for what you're doing for the photography community.
Thank you! 🙏
I pulled out my 51 year-old film OM-1 and it weighs 485 grams, virtually the same as the OM-3 with battery. It also is wide, wider than my digital OM-1. Lack of a hand grip was no problem to us in the past. The camera was cradled with the left hand, and with long, heavy lenses, the left hand supported them. Just a couple days ago, I was thinking, wouldn't it be nice to have built-in digital equivalents of Wratten filters for monochrome, and, lo and behold, the OM-3 has them. Want to shoot landscapes in B&W like Ansel Adams? You have to use Wratten filters. Weather sealing is essential for us who do nature photography, and the best image stabilization in the industry means that I don't carry a tripod. I live in northern Minnesota, and when it's -40, I just tuck the camera with lens inside my parka and am ready to photograph at any time.
Been waiting for OM to release this type of camera for a while. And I’m glad they aren’t just sticking to the birding/nature market. Especially as M43 is perfect for street photography.
Really great camera. I played with OM1Mk2 for a day, was bit overwhelming. This one seems more for me :) yet I wish for a full black version
In the States the OM-3 is $1999.99 body only. That is a tough sell. As an MFT/OMS fanboy I love the idea of this camera and will most likely pick one up. Wish the price was a bit lower, but given the IP53 weather-sealing, the features, the ergonomics, same battery as the OM-1 and continued support for all existing lenses, I'm sure I'll cave in. MFT and specifically OMS/Olympus gear is just so damn fun to use and the OM-3 has some promising improvements to get creative quickly. I like the art dial from the PEN F and the new CP button. There will always be haters and skeptics but I think the true MTF and OMS daily users will enjoy this camera. It won't replace my OM-1 MII but makes for a good traveling companion. The original PEN-F mirrorless body still commands a price tag of $1300 to $1400 on the used market, so the OM-3, like nearly all previous Olympus and OMS cameras before it, should have a usable shelf life of many, many years. I still use the ten year old OM-D E-M10 MII for street and travel and expect to have as much fun with the OM-3 ten years from now.
Yes, I second everything you said! The initial price is stiff (esp in Canada). But it should come down. I'm astonished at the prices of used PEN-F's out there! Too bad they didn't make a PEN-F Mk II with these specs.
Weirdly, it's actually very slightly cheaper in Australia than in the UK, coming up at $3200 AU, which is $2007 US but only 1618 pounds.
I don't understand the purpose of the OM-3 if the OM-5 exists. It would have made more sense to release a budget OM-10.
DPReviews says it's the lest expensive camera with a stacked sensor. It's the sensor driving up the price
@@BananaCake26 The problem is that the advantages of stacked sensors is not widely known. Sure, it implies that it’s better than “non stacked” sensors. But it’s not something easily relatable like megapixels, etc. Even I wouldn’t be able to explain to someone why they need a stacked sensor.
This is a refreshingly different review from the "sciency" assessments. The joy and enthusiasm of photography is shining through this review. Added to me being a taker of photos and not a scientist, I'm sold. It's a stunning homage to the heyday of celebrity photography, with all the bells and whistles. Great review.
It’s so pretty! They’ve done a great job with this one, good to see OM System delivering something that will suit a lot of MFT users!
It REALLY is pretty. A beautiful object in its own right.
I don’t think there’s anything you you’re unable to get from any other Olympus camera or the camera that you’re already own after all that sensor is older than I am coming up for nine years old really and truly there’s nothing New. Please don’t fall for this this somewhat tiring over enthusiastic presenting star.
Cheer up Thomas!
@ Nonsense. The stacked sensor was first introduced in the OM-D E-M1 Mark III 2020.
Hey there.
I own an OM1 MKII and I am more than happy to share nearly all the best bits with the OM3 which is a far sexier and better looking camera. Zero green pangs. I hope this camera brings a lot more love for OM Systems and converts more people, particularly rank amateurs like me, to 4/3.
Full sensor, APS-C, MFT all have advantages and disadvantages. Instead of the snobbery, belittling and hot takes, we should all appreciate the simple premise that we all want to enjoy photography in its many different forms.
PS. You are a great ambassador for 4/3, photography and life in general.
Thanks so much! I totally agree with your sentiment! While people are squabbling over sensor sizes, I'll be out having fun with cameras haha
This OM3 camera release, and your detailed review on the OM1 mkii vs the G9 mkii, are renewing my faith that there are still some hardcore designers and engineers from the Olympus days working at or associated with OM systems. They actually seem to be listening to customer feedback. It's a very good sign from OM systems in my humble opinion.
This seems like a great camera indeed. They have loaded it with all of the specs.
@ yes, it's not inexpensive, but you seem to get almost all the important bits of an OM1 mkii in a small, stylish, premium body. I really want to get one.
Thanks!
Thanks so much 🙏
NEED!!!!
I was desperately miss my old Olympus gear and was just about to buy a Nikon ZF simply because it is the closest thing to exactly what I’m looking for. But, now, the OM3? THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT I WANT!
TAKE MY MONEY!!!!
Yes..I miss my m43 gear as well..bought a ZF last year but just not using it or enjoying it as much. Takes great images but with the lenses I end up carrying too much. The OM3 looks perfect as it is smaller but still has the computational features from my old em1m3, while having the retro form factor I prefer..as well I kiss the 12-100 and other gems ..have some thinking to do..
@@rztrk3311 Yeah, you'll pretty well have to kiss your 12-100 goodbye on this camera, unless you want cramped fingers! This lens is not comfortable even on the E-M5 Mk III/OM-5 with its slight grip.
@Centauri27 lol I have small hands and have used 10-25mm on ep7 as well as 12100 so not problemo
@@rztrk3311 That’s good to hear! But I notice there’s a big difference once you have to lug a large lens on a small body for an entire trip: it really starts to annoy you! So much so that I bought a G9 to better pair with my 12-100. That large grip makes the lens feel lighter!
Everyone thought Olympus was going to go down like (Sony) Vaio but OM System actually has been making good choices on all fronts! Glad this camera has come out!
The OM-3 is absolutely gorgeous! Will work perfectly in many scenarios for me and I will definitely buy it as soon as possible! Almost perfect! I would like to see a better evf, but it is ok as it is.
This is the first camera I've seen come out in a very long time, that I would like to get. The other cameras are great and all that, not saying there have been no great cameras, but I just haven't felt the same way about them as I do about this. Whenever, some day, I will upgrade, this might be the camera.
I was just questioning myself as to why I follow your channel, and it hit me. It's your enthusiasm. I have used mostly Sony cameras for several years now, ever since they started the full frame mirrorless craze. And yet, I still follow you. Your zest for these cameras makes me want one, even though the price point makes it prohibitive for me. I'm sure your channel will continue to grow, as your zeal makes this Sony guy interested in your great content.
Yes! I’m shooting DSLRs and unlikely will get a MFT soon, however after watching MFN’s videos, I find myself wanting to pick one up. I love the videos on budget cameras and lenses. The portability of a MFT camera is very appealing and this channel is “lovely” for keeping my interest in the system.
@@mo_sisu I can easily make photos with my OM and Lumix G9 II that you cannot with your Nikon cameras.
To anyone concerned about the output and being m43rds- just look at the output of the PenF. I think the PenF produced amazing fantastic color, probably the best I have seen in m43rds land and this OM-3 will do at least the same if not a hair better. To me that's really good overall.
If you are thinking about getting one, don't let the sensor be the consideration unless you really need a lot of low light photography where you need to shoot higher ISO for freezing movement- since you can do static shots at lower ISO thanks to the IBIS.
This is a pretty good-looking and spec'd camera. I'll be looking forward to owning it in 10 years when I can afford it and everybody else is salivating over the latest thing. And in that time it will still be an amazing camera, just like most things from 10 years ago.
Give it 6 months, it will be $1200
Its not going to hold price lol.
How can you be so rude and not buy anything new?
Good on you mate, I'm 100% in your league!
Mmmm yet another beautiful camera I absolutely do not need but really want! IBIS looks awesome. Awesome review Em, Finland looked dreamy!
Yes, Emily, this is a great new camera! On the other hand for us amateurs that actually splurged to get the OM1 MII, there really is no motivation to move to this camera. The lack of a camera grip is a major negative in my book, though I do love it’s original looks! I used to have an OM1, an OM2 and then an OM4 back in the day! :-) I’m also deep in the learning cycle for the MII and all its capabilities, which I have yet to investigate!
It wouldn't make sense for you to.. the OM-3 isn't the flagship the OM-1II is. The OM-3 falls between the 1 and 5.
I’d stick to the OM1 ii
The main issue is that the Olympus OM-3 features an MFT sensor, while the similarly priced Nikon Zf has a FF sensor. Advantage to the Olympus for using the MFT mount, which makes it backwards compatible with a lot of lenses.
Other than that, let's see how it performs overall, although I doubt it's gonna truly disappoint in any area.
The vintage compact should be the best category to show the advantage of M43. Relieved that OM pulled it off.
.. and yet it doesn't. The only real advantage of M43 is the size of lenses (well, some) Sure they could make a 'vintage body' smaller but they haven't. The Nikon Zfc and Fujifilm bodies are smaller and lighter yet have a larger sensor. A real contender would be an OM-10 or OM-5 sized body made with a light metal body like titanium or even a composite alloy... not THAT would be pulling it off.
The Fuji xt50 is so tiny next to my G9II. @@samsantana
Having a hands on look on Thursday - can’t wait! Seems to be made for my type of photograph!!
I wish I could justify spending the money, but that's not a complaint about the price. It's just that my Pen F is still rockin'. I'm 99% sure I will eventually get an OM-3 though. The only thing I wish they'd added was a system for what Lumix calls real time LUTs. The creative dial functions are so awesome, but most people never realized how great they are. I think if it was easy to create and share custom profiles, people would be in awe of the possibilities. I mostly shoot in mono mode, and the mono features on the Pen F (and now this) are amazing... but until you use it, it's hard to realize just how amazing and intuitive they are. Bring up the color wheel. Spin the front dial to choose which color to filter. Spin the rear dial to choose the strength of the filter. You can do it all, on the fly through the viewfinder, while setting up your shot. It's AWESOME.
EDIT! The OM System website says you can share those creative dial custom settings. If they made it easy to do, that's very exciting.
They did mention you can create and share them via OM Workspace - their free photo editing software. It wasn't updated yet but hopefully it is now so I can have a tinker when my om3 arrives!
222
Thanks for a good video MFN; do we know whether the AF performance is identicial in the OM-3 compared to the OM-1.2 for things that move barring the differences in buffer sizes?
Hey, Panasonic are you seeing this? Where's GX10?
Wonderful. I am searching for a compact and every-day-carry alternative to my G9, but without compromises I have do take using a GX9 or something.. and now OM brings this beast! Everything I was looking for!
Here Is a suggestion - It's a little off topic., but you did mention gloves I live in Montana, where shooting is in winter can freeze your fingers. What I do is buy the wool mittens that have finger holes with the top part of the mitten that is flap that can flip back to expose the the fingers. I flip the flap up when I need fine motor control of over my camera button and flip it back when I need to keep my fingers warm. I usually put a glove liner in them, so it works out great for keeping your fingers warm and controlling your camera buttons.
Great review. I was a huge fan of the EM - 5, EM-5 MK II. I was extremely disappointed like many other when they made it a "plastic" camera.
No compromises? How about the lower resolution EVF, the single card slot and the reduced burst rate and stabilisation compared to the OM-1? All cameras have compromises of course, but whether these are crucial or not depends on the use case of individuals. I get why someone would get excited over the looks and size of this camera, and if those things are really important then by all means go for it. It certainly is a very capable camera, but for me, the OM-1 is a much better fit, not least because the ergonomics are superior.
I think you're exactly right with your last sentence there, if someone routinely uses longer lenses, or needs a dual SD slot, then the OM1 might be better anyway as it's more comfortable and designed for those purposes.
Though for the burst modes it's worth noting that the Pro Capture mode is exactly the same in both cameras, so 20fps with CAF and up to 50 depending on the lens. So losing one or two clicks with the mechanical shutter doesn't seem like too much of a compromise to me personally, as if I definitely wanted to catch something I'd use the faster modes anyway.
And again for the EVF - a great EVF is essential for wildlife photography for example- i lived inside my OM1 evf on safari! So that would be miles better for people who mainly shoot that stuff. But for everyday carry use i think there's more of a split between evf and viewfinder so having a slightly less good EVF doesn't bother me. Also... I didn't even realise it was less resolution until today 😂 it looks lovely and is great to use in practice. I think you'd need to literally put you eye to one then the other to really notice
@@MicroFourNerds I wouldn't argue with anything you say, and you make a compelling case for the OM-3. For me, it's not the size of the body that matters, it's the lenses. I regularly use a E-M1X with the same resolution finder, but whether the OM-3's finder is actually better by way of more advanced optics, I am unable to say. While the E-M1X's EVF doesn't hold me back, looking through it is not as pleasant an experience as the EVF on my Nikon Z8, which isn't all that much higher resolution in practice (3.69 million dots). All I know is that the Nikon viewfinder is much better than that of the E-M1X and appears (to my eyes) just as good as the 5.76 million dots of my Leica SL2-S. Thus I am willing to be persuaded that OM Systems has worked some magic with the viewfinder of the OM-3, but I can only assume costs or other constraints stopped them putting the OM-1's EVF in the OM-3.
Today I saw a lot of videos about OM3 in Italian, Spanish, Portuguese and English, I came back here to tell you your video was absolutely the best in town, thanks
In fact in Italy I heard a lot of bullshit, except one that was very detailed.
@clabart i think in Italy we are not prepared about mft and there is not a big m43 community so the content creators that are main Sony shooters had for first time a mft in their hands (only riflessioni fotografiche has a good reputation in mft italian community)
@ In fact, the duo Damiano and Roberto are more competent
It for sure is an aesthetically pleasing camera to look at.
Thank you for this user review. Very informative and not just dry specs.
I am in love with this camera before I even had my hands on it!! I will definitely have one.
Great video! The OM3 looks pretty fantastic. My only complaint is the twisty flippy screen. One that tilts left and right and up and down like the xt5 would have been much better for me. I'll just have to decide if that's a deal breaker. Especially on a camera that's intended more for stills.
Besides all the bells and whistles, I love how it looks like my old film Olympus.
As a PEN F owner, I’d get excited for a PEN F II, not a fancy OM-1. For that, I already have the OM-1.
I think is a gorgeous looking camera, and the price might seem a little steep at first, but it comes fully feature packed, and the lens selection is great because of the already existing olympus and Panasonic lenses (also the new OM ones). Definitely one to consider if you are looking for a camera that's good at everything. 👌
Yay new m43 camera. Well done OM. Hope it does well.
Its awesome to see OM System continuing the Olympus legacy! This camera will make a lot of people happy for a long lime, as someone who is still using an EM5 mkii and EM1 mkii I can honestly say these cameras are built to last! I don't see the sensor as a limitation, 20mp is plenty for many applications plus the lens eco system for the platform is incredible! Awesome content as always 👍
.... I've just had a worrying thought as an OM-5 user... I really hope the OM-5 range doesn't get dumbed down to make room for the OM-3 😢 - I don't need all the latest and greatest tech in my OM-5s but i really hope they'll keep the weather sealing and generally high quality components (shutters dials etc). I'm scared future OM-5s will be the new EM10s.
Im not in the market for a camera right now, but for me this is an excellent indicator of where om system are taking the brand. 2 or 3 years from now i might be picking up my om3 ii
I've come to your comments section for refuge. Mine's like a warzone at the moment! 😅
Great video as always Em!
I'm sorry Tom 😂 I feel your pain. I've been thwacking a few negative people with my Fighty Lobster Energy 🦞 We have a little wholesome corner of the internet here on the whole! Come on in, pull up a chair! Get a hot chocolate
I just watched your video after seeing your comment here. Your video is pretty balanced. I swear there are too many people that have some real m4/3 hate and will not fail to miss a chance to take a swipe at anything positive (or even neutral) whenever possible. Good, fair video btw.
How good is the AF for street? I LOVED LOVED my OG EM5, but sadly, the face detect and tracking just didn't work well, and AF in general wasn't the greatest for street. My Sony A7 mkii is my level of "good AF"...if the OM-3 has that or better, I would happily go back to OM. LOVED the colors in my OG EM5, weather sealing, small primes, etc. for street.
Super snappy for street i can't wait to do more of that with the OM3. Mike Mcgee did a great OM3 review in London with some street photography examples in it
First review I watched! Well done! Initial pricing here in Canada is exactly the same as the OM1 (ll) ($2800) which it seems to close to, but smaller. Star Focus too? Looks lovely and folks have been waiting for a small full featured MFT. Well done OM! A bit too pricey for me, but a wonderful camera!
Yup, $2800 up here in Canada is kinda hard to swallow. OM Systems had a barn burner of a sale on the OM-1 Mk I just last week at $1699--I almost bought one. But it wasn't improvement enough over my G9 to blow that kind of cash.
How does the build quality feel compared to the original E-M5? Same build quality and feel, or better? Great video as always!
As an Olympus head, this makes me very happy
I wanted to buy into the Fujifilm ecosystem when I have the money, but this OM3 is so darn sexy. 😢
Sorry to say at £1700 body only in the UK or £2000 with a lens, I think OM Systems have priced it out of most MFT fans, and you get can get a lot more camera on other systems for the same money...
Love the look, but think I'll be sticking with my S5ii, and not come back to MFT and OM and keep hold of the OM20 Film camera I have...Such a shame as it seems a nice camera with some nice features..
Even worse, in the "other Europe", it is 2000€ body only.
I would agree. That's at least 3 months of disposable income for most in the UK. That's quite a bit.
I agree, I really don't get the flagship price level. It would have been a lot more "approachable" if the price was in between this and the OM5. To me it just smells like they want 1.000 € extra just because it has the 4 year old "new" sensor. But even that seems odd as they have been able to discount the OM-1 MkI to around 1.200 EUR with cashback.
Camera is nice and all. The price is a huge turnoff and tells me more about what the company is trying to do than what the camera is all about. Which is shame really.
The price in Australia: $3200 for the body only. 😢
2000€, crazy.
I love it, I'm sure I would be more than happy with that little camera but is crazy money for it.
What's the straight out of camera like? Just to get an idea of what I'm working with. I typically love a camera that just looks print-ready coming from the SD. I love my R8 and the wife's G7XII. This could be an upgrade for her.
I think the issue doesn’t lay in comparison to other OM cameras but to similarly priced cameras from other brands. It’s a very tough sell against Nikon ZF, Fujifilm x-t5 [or even zfc and x-t50]. Like the hi res mode in om-3 is 50mp while the sensor itself in x-t50 is 40mp…and it has IBIS and it has film sims and subject tracking, bigger sensor etc., etc…for like 60% of the price of the OM-3. While keeping similar size too
Exactly my thought. If you like pure image quality, you go with a larger sensor. If you want great IBIS and compact lenses, you go for the OM1 and save a couple of bucks. If you purely want retro design inside the M43 cosmos, the OM5 design might be enough nostalgia.
High res is 50, hand held, 80 on a tripod. If you are considering THIS camera, I expect you have lenses for it. FWIW Lumix G9 II does 100 Mpx hand-held. OM cameras have five and more stops of Live ND, I use that more often than I go to high resolution.
@@iSchrott3G For pure image quality, shoot high resolution. The algorithm largely kills the noise. I saw a test where the reviewer considered it outperformed a Nikon, I forget which.
I had this same thought which is why I can't justify getting this when I have an x-t5. However one thing to consider with the larger sensor is lens sizes. The fuji x primes are all significantly larger and heavier than similar ones on m43. The compact lenses are the main reason I keep my lumix gx85 around since it's sooooo tiny with the 20mm lumix prime.
My first camera was the original OM-D E-M5, and the good looks and all-metal body of the OM-3 make me look back fondly. Now, I have the OM-1 for nature photography and another brand’s (I’m afraid to even say it) camera for most other photography. While this looks like a great camera, I won’t be getting one for a few reasons: I like more megapixels for cropping; I’m one of those people who really enjoys a joystick (Sorry Emily!); and I much prefer a tilty screen to a flippy screen. That said, I’m happy that OM Systems is putting out a new and exciting small camera that takes advantage of the best aspects of M43. The more great cameras that are released, the better it is for every photographer.
The one compromise I can see is only one card slot.
Looks like a great camera though! I'm overall quite happy with my OM5. For video it doesn't quite seem at the same level as the G9II or the GH7 but for sure totally usable there as well.
One other omission: no af joystick.
@@cookedartwith good phase detect is it really needed?
Do I see that you're a secret punk rock fan!? AVRIL? Also great review and video :)
Absolutely! 🤘 thanks Chris!
I have to admit that my first thoughts on finally seeing this camera unveiled was, 'so, what?'.
But having watched several videos, including yours which is probably the most useful, I can see 'why!'.
I'm more likely to think of this as a second body than I was initially.
Brava Emily: a complete review like I've never seen in Italy. The memories of this camera take me back to the 70s, the golden years of Olympus when I photographed with the legendary OM-1 (not mine, I had other brands) that is traced by today's OM-3 Digitale. I saw it yesterday at the store. I would have preferred to have the timing ring rather than that of automatic modes and memory banks for the settings not so much to imitate the OM-1 as for the convenience of setting up quickly with the thumb and index finger of the right hand. A strangeness in your video: the video recording times of over 2 continuous hours without overheating and blocking whose test was carried out in a very northern latitude country in a usually cold season, I don't think that if I had been in the Mediterranean in the summer you would have gotten such a long continuous video recording time.
Yes, in the press release now it's out, it says unlimited recording under 40 degrees C, and up to 40 mins I think over 40 degrees. Might struggle in some climates for sure for long clips! But for smaller bits I think 40 mins in tough heat is really generous. Definitely won't be shooting any outdoor wedding ceremonies with it any time soon though!
i'm looking forward to this camera for my upgrade, it sure look epic, but i think the 2000USD price tag is a bit much, it is not too expensive but too close to OM-1 II
i will stick with M43 and i do still want OM-3, but i think i will go for OM-1 II for now and wait for sales on OM-3
For some context
OM-1 II's MSRP is 2400USD, but it regularly got discount to 2000
So now OM-3 and OM-1 II is basically at the same price, so you must really want the retro look to not buy the OM-1 II
Although I'm sure OM-3 will start to be heavily discount some point in the future, just like most camera brands do, MSRP usually don't stay for that long
My first camera was an OM1MD in 1975 which I still have. It's on my desk. I also have my OM2MD from 1982 and all of my original Zuiko lenses. This looks exciting. I shoot Sony now professionally, but this looks like a great camera for everyday use. Thanks for your amazing content. Always enjoy your sunshine face! Thanks for the work you put in to make these videos great.
Here in Australia there's no mention of the 5-year warranty, but you do get a bonus leather strap for ordering before the end of February.
No kits either…just body only. And at the price they want for it, it’s more expensive than the ZF, the X100VI and 1.5x the price on the S9 body only. It’s going to be a tough sell
@@patrick8035 The kit with the 12-45 f/4 Pro is available through retailers like Camera House. AU$600 more for the lens.
@@patrick8035 it is available with the 12-45 f4 pro lens
Ted's has it with the 12-45 pro and the uupdated 17 1.8 as kits
@@patrick8035yes its more expensive than all those cameras, but like with all cameras... My lenses don't fit on any of those bodies. And unless you have a Nikon, no new mirrorless lenses from other manufacturers are going to fit on your camera.
This OM3 is factually cheaper than buying a zf and a 50 1.8, the 24-70 f4 and the 100-400 4.5-5.6, which is what I'd need to replicate my current Olympus/Panasonic kit.
And yes I'm not just an OM fanboy, this is always the argument no matter what the brand comparison is.
At last a new camera! Thoughts and feelings below! 🦞🦞🫶🫶
I hate it because this is everything I wanted my OM-5 to be, but at the time the tech hadn't caught up yet and I DESPERATELY needed an upgrade from my GX85. I'm crying for myself, but rejoicing for other M43 users
I like the double exposure concept. But, I still want a Pen F first.
No Pen F unfortunately. It can't be built weather sealed so this is as close as we're ever going to get as far as i believe
@ weather sealing is very enticing.
This camera and an M. Zuiko 12-45 f4 or a Panasonic-Leica 12-35 f2.8 and an Olympus 45 f1.8 or Panasonic 42.5 f1.7 would be an excellent and flexible two lens kit. I'm very pleased with this camera release.
Thanks Emily. First new camera I’ve been genuinely excited in for many years. Seeing your video has stoked my fire to buy one
I think that they have produced a brilliant little camera that is true to the ethos of Olympus/ OM Systems portability and useabilty. I had and loved ysing an original Olympus ON1 and this is the closest thing, even better in fact.
I had high hopes for something innovative from OM System. I love their 20mm f/1.4, but at €2000 for just the body, it’s a hard sell, especially when I could grab a new OM1 Mark II for €2085 or a G9II for €1760 right now.
I think you didn't mention the OM3's electronic viewfinder. It has the same resolution as my 2017 GH5 and the OM-5. Hopefully the EVF screen is better than those, but it's not ideal for outdoor photography or manual focusing with legacy glass. Also, I doubt the missing joystick is due to engineering challenges. Come on, it's an ergonomic standard these days, and this isn't an entry-level priced camera.
I’ll wait a few months to see if Lumix releases something new. If not, I’ll likely upgrade to the G9II once I see it for under €1500. It offers 25MP, a joystick, better EVF resolution, and is a beast for video with impeccable ergonomics. Sure, it's bigger and uglier, but sometimes, function trumps form.
I have the G9ii, it’s a great camera, but the evf is disappointing, the OM1ii has a much better evf
I’m not in the market for a new camera (loving my Canon R7) but the OM3 is a gorgeous camera that, based on your great review, looks like it can do it all! Very cool.
In Australia I am seeing the OM-3 costs $200AUD more than the OM-1 ii. I guess I'll be sticking with my G9ii
Fellow g9ii owner with absolutely no desire to give the OM-3 more than a few moments thought. Price, features, and form factor all fall short of the mark. It looks nice I guess, but I can only image how tiring it’d be to use with longer lenses.
Back in the day I couldn't afford the original OM1 so had to settle for the FTL which was lost in the 74 floods. Looks like history repeating and I'll stick with my OMD cameras. Although, selling my OMD1ii and my OMD5iii may be replaced with one camera that does it all.....😊
That's not what I saw at Camerahouse or OM-Systems.
@@oneeyedphotographer I was looking at Digidirect
This really made me consider the OM-3 as my next upgrade after skipping the OM-1. But it actually does have some drawbacks: no af joystick, small command buttons (this really annoys me with my E-M5 III), low resolution viewfinder, only 1 card slot. Ergonomics are important, that’s the only reason why I sold my Pen-F years ago.
Ok, Panasonic, looking at you now. GX10 when?
Yes please Panasonic
Me toooooo!
It's not the form factor I prefer. I'd like to get an OM1 Mii, but having the OM1 Mi I can't justify the expense for the relatively minor upgrade. Here's hoping the continued releases from OM Systems signify their longevity, and they'll develop an OM1 Miii for those of us waiting a few years between upgrading. I'm invested in the M43 system with all my lenses at this point. So I'm hoping for the best. I love the photos you got of the dogs here, Emily. I'm a big softy for the snow/sled dog breeds. Thanks for sharing your enthusiasm! You give me renewed love for photography, reminding me why I love it so much each time I see a new video.
Ohhh…. I think I’m sold. I bought the EM5 iii in 2022 after the OM-5 came out because I didn’t see the value in it. I’ve been loving the EM5iii but wishing for some of the newer features, the Starry AF in particular, and lately looking at the OM-1 but not wanting to compromise on size. This has everything I could want, AND to top it off it looks like the OM-20 I had and loved in the 80s. I don’t think I can resist this one!
Fantastic review, Emily. To complement this, I suggest Thomas Eisl's review too. He has the same overall conclusion, and covers several additional details & insights. You both have such keen judgment, based on a rare depth of understanding. Of course, I look forward to your upcoming video's on the OM-3 to expand my understanding, and Eisl's as well.
I'm enamored of the colors and look of your stills and video shots in this review!
BTW, "LUTS" (well, custom color and monochrome settings) from the EP-7 can also be shared with the OM-3, via OM Workspace.
I'll almost certainly buy this new camera.
I a not throwing it way because of the sensor, but the size. Yup, doesn't seem that small. I was hoping for an EM5.2 size class or OM-5 tops. I value size and this makes me look at Fuji a bit much.
Still want to see it in person and check official size.
Oh and price.
Emily - on price, let's be honest, the issue is not comparing within m43rds but with competitors like Fuji. Like how much is an X-T5? That kind of thing.
Hi there Josh! I agree with you about the size. Considering all my setup is Lumix S, right now I'm just praying for a GX9 update to have that fun EDC camera✌🏻🙂
I love it. I don't have one but you're right, it certainly ticks a lot of boxes. 👍
How does it work with Panasonic lenses, ie does lens stabilization decrease?
Us Pen-F enthusiasts didn't have it box checked here.
This is the improper form factor.
To me it's pretty obvious what we want, and been asking for it for half a decade plus.
Yep. Maybe they have something smaller in the works which would cost even less. So it would be better selling the higher priced stuff frst..
@@kaptnwelpe5322 I wouldn't hold my breath!
I’m happy they brought out a new camera and with the stacked sensor and better auto focus etc. Looks like it’s got the goods. In my opinion though the only problem I see so far is that these features and sensor should have been in the om5 body as it has the better ergonomics to be the backup body to the om1 mkii or be the smaller full featured body. Just a shame it didn’t get those features.
Aah, my om1.2 is getting a little sister for everyday photos. Thank you for your exciting user experience views that helped me decide on the om1.. I'll be an early adopter of this wee gem, and the 17km2
How about the handling? Is it uncomfortable to use with the zoom ?
Thank you, this review made my day. You had me at all metal build quality and phase detect autofocus. I think this will be the win OM systems needs to get back in the game. I think they gave me a reason to really consider upgrading my EM5 mkii (finally not to a plastic body).
Did you know that large parts of spacecraft are plastic? Metal would melt.
@@oneeyedphotographer no I was not aware of that, but I question: would those "large" parts not likely be titanium and ceramic vs. plastic? At least the parts that come in contact with serious heat on re-entry would likely be ceramic. Perhaps other key components (electrical connectors inside the hull) are plastic, but the parts heating up on re-entry? I kind of doubt that. Yes, aluminium (one type of metal) has a low melting point (660 C) vs steel (iron and carbon and chromium for stainless that melts around 1450 C but it's really heavy for flying vehicles), why the Concord jets was made from titanium (melts around 1700 C and light and strong but expensive and hard to work with) since aluminum used on most regular aircraft would age harden and weaken due to air friction at the speeds achieved by the concord, but I'm sure there are parts, maybe even "large" parts on the space shuttle that are made from specialized heat resistant plastic. Just the same I'm happy the OM3's has a magnesium alloy body (melting point 650 C). I'm unsure of the melting point of the engineered plastics on the EM5 mkiii or OM5 but I prefer the look and feel of metal (magnesium alloy), which is why I've kept using my EM5 mkii. I'm sure there are parts inside the OM3 that are high quality plastic as well. Either way I believe the "large plastic parts" on the space craft that take a lot of heat may in fact be ceramic (a totally different material) and that even metal with a low melting point of magnesium alloy or aluminium above 600 C will be sufficient for most photographic applications.
You’d need a crazy fast lens to have the same kind of background blurr as ff which is my biggest reason to not use mft. Otherwise it would be really nice and compact
OM really got this one right. I don't usually even think about buying new cameras, but I'm tempted this time.
@adosrealdeal7036 who needs mech shutter with stacked sensor?
I'd like to have one. I'll wait a year or so for them to hit the used market. I also want to see what Canon is cooking up with the R7 II. I hear it is going to be top tier.
Hello Emily - do you know if Olympus plan to issue an all black version?
I asked that myself because that would be my preference, but no signs just yet for a black version unfortunately
@@MicroFourNerds
That's disappointing, considering "the real" OM-3 was only available in black.
Everybody knows black cameras take better pictures😋
@@hansemannluchter643 well if you’re not in a hurry, I’m sure they will come out with one! They did that with the O M4 back then too!
Interesting video. I was not optimistic about this camera at first, but you’re making me think twice. Good points!
Great review, Emily. Charming, qualified, comprehensive. And your wonderful accent! 🙂
Hi Emily, a useful review, which answered a lot of questions, many thanks. Unfortunately, although the camera ticks nearly all the boxes as a light compact EDC, the dealbreaker for me is no front grip like the OM5/EM5/EM10. If OM System had used a similar removable grip of the EPL-6, I would already be an OM3 owner! Fingers crossed the OM5 Mkii has subject tracking.
Well, I'm sure there will be a wealth of 3rd party grips out for this camera soon, if OM Systems themselves don't produce one. But yeah, the lack of a grip is a deal breaker for me.
I cant believe it's $2k though! Im probably gonna buy one anyway, but still seems excessive. wow lol
That is a shocker really. It's definitely not an entry point to m43 shooting when a good used m43 csn be had for a 1/4 of that.
Only saying this because you said you were in a mood to fight :-). In this post I want to address the price issue and what I think could have been done that's still compelling:
- OM-5 sensor. This sensor has a reasonable fast refresh even if it's not stacked (Z6iii speed / 60Hz) but should help a lot with that price because not stacked
- Do at least same live ND of the EM1Mark III (the OM-5 is one less ND level, so that's an upgrade)
- Include the GND ND to the level of the live ND (yes, it can be done, that's a post processing/CPU feature, not sensor bound - if you can do liveND to 5 stops, you can do GND ND to 5 stops)
- Yes, keep those PenF color profiles and options
- AI AF/improved AF/AI Jpeg engine of OM1/OM3 as it came out
- IBIS like what OM-5 already does. Let's mark it at 6 stops if CIPA changed (apparently it did)
- Faster HHHR resolve like OM3/OM1
- 14-bit RAW options for HHHR/ tripod HR (this isn't really stacked sensor dependent either)
- Same EVF OM3 came out with
This would net hopefully a significant lower price, less high electronic shutter FPS (but the OM-5/EM1MKIII already do like what, 20? 30?)
Maybe price could be $1500 USD MSRP? Like 1500-1600 Euros?
Yes, I do think that while you will always get complainers, this nets you virtually the same level of image quality (we know by now the OM-1 sensor never captured 2 stops better DR or ISO over previous sensor, that was a real class on misinformation by some influencers), with key creator color options. Why does the OM-3 need a stacked sensor? It's almost like maybe they could not buy the OM-5 sensor anymore in bulk or something.
The OM-3 is not the kind of camera that needs a stacked sensor. And the OM-5 sensor can already capture at quite a high FPS electronic shutter in general. I really think this would have made it more attractive for someone not invested in m43rds already.
As for PenF sized boy 'can't be made weather sealed' - the EM5.2 body *IS* weather sealed and it's quite small. yes, I say it can be done.
About the sensor: Emily I think we need to look at the context.
While the sensor itself has been changed, it *feels* like this is the same image quality we're getting with the 2016 Pen-F, which I think was Olympus' first 20 megapixel sensor camera. So while it was unlikely, some of us did hold out that maybe the OM-3 would do what the Pen-F did back in 2016 - a bump in image quality for photographs.
I have the OM-1 Mark ii and I love that camera, but hot damn, I can't deny that it takes the same quality of images as the EM1 Mark ii and Pen-F - especially in the ISO 200 to 1600 range.
The sensor conversation I find so strange because I think most of the people who say that 20 megapixels is fine, would also be thrilled if they gave us something a bit higher resolution.
I get that you're excited about this camera, and that's lovely. But I don't really get who this camera is for.
I think if you're a professional, the single card slot is a dealbreaker - at least for me, it is. I had TWO cards corrupt in 2 years, and I'm so thankful I had a backup in the camera.
If you're a person who wants to take nice photos of the family and friends and want the retro styling, then $2000 is a lot of money. Forget the cheaper options in Fuji and Nikon for a second, you can get the OM5 or EM5 Mark iii for cheaper - the photos will look the same for the most part. As for the styling, I wish they kept the rangefinder Pen-F look because to me, this just looks like a bigger OM5 for the most part.
I dunno. The camera isn't for me. Speaking for myself - I'm okay I guess with the same 20 megapixels, but if they gave me two card slots, Pen-F styling, and a joystick on the back, I would be on board.
The pixel size in full-frame 100mpx sensors is the same as m4/3 at 20mpx. You're not going to get more mpx without a revolutionary sensory that's going to go to a flagship camera first.
Maybe they could have tweaked the computational side a bit, but just getting the entire camera into a smaller, cheaper body is already great, and a pretty significant accomplishment.
But, sounds like this camera just isn't for you. And imo, that's fine. If the lower price and different ergonomics don't get you excited, don't buy it.
Same resolution, but not the same IQ. My experience from the OM-1 vs the G9 and E-M1.II is the stacked 20MP sensor is better in terms of both noise and DR to the older 20MP non-stacked sensor from the Pen-F.
@@adam_mawz_maas Well, to my eyes, in the 200 to 1600 ISO range using the same lens, photographing the same thing under the exact same lighting conditions, I can't tell the images apart between my OM1-Mark ii, my EM1-Markii, EM1-Markiii, EM5-Markiii, Pen-F, and OM-5. I can't comment on any other cameras. Once I go past ISO 1600 I notice some differences, but I find them minor. More differences in the 6400 and beyond range, but I don't personally like the images in any M43 camera past 3200 anyway. Bit better shadow recovery in post for the newer cams, but...I personally find the differences marginal.
I mean, it is what it is. You might be noticing more of a difference than I am within these cameras.
Personally, I don't find the image quality to be lacking per say. I'm just saying that for those who ARE disappointed they're not getting a resolution bump, I can appreciate where they're coming from since the IQ has largely been the same for a long time.
Im glad youve found your ideal does everything camera. I guess your future reviews can only criticise the new models. I cant believe so many people commenting here are upgrading just because the camera looks nice, and a little smaller than OM-1ii, even though specs are practically same. What are you people doing that this new camera will do better?
Little camera? hmm it's noticeably bigger and heavier than the OM-5, heavier and longer than the Nikon ZF-c, heavier and bigger than a Fujifim XT50.. not sure about all the fuzz... aside from a metal body (which doesn't mean it's better built or more likely to take a fall) there's not much to it.
I agree with you this is NOT a "little camera." I don't know where Emily gets that honestly. It's bigger than PenF, OM-5, X-E4, X-T50. It's pretty much almost an X-T5 class size.
The good news to me is that it seems OM Systems is showing a pulse, and I hope they can do a proper update to the OM-5. Everyone saying "but didn't you guys ask all the time for a compact" - no. We asked fora. PenFII or EM5.2 type body size.
On/Off button on the left, is one of my biggest pet peeves in camera design. I just want to be able to pull the camera out, switch it on and shoot.. without needing my left hand.
Well you can. You can just assign it to the CP button
@MicroFourNerds oh, okay. That's an interesting solution. Though, not quite the same as have the actual dedicated button at the "right" place.
Cool camera but $2000 in the US body only is way too much. The OM 1 MkII is $2000 on sale right now. Bad decision there. And there are some compromises. Only shoots 6fps mech shutter. I’ll stick with my Pen F. I really wanted this at $1600 US. I’ll wait for the big price drop in a couple months. Maybe.
Those are two completely different cameras.
@ really? I didn’t know that. 🙄 What does that have to do with the extremely overinflated price of the OM-3?
@ the Zf and Z6III are two different cameras with the same 24mp but there’s a $500 gap at all times between the two. Also the OM 1 II is the flagship camera. The Zf is $3500 cheaper than the Z9. I’m using this example because I’m sure you’re gonna use the “retro” look as the excuse for the OM3 vs everything else. There’s no excuse for $2000 for this camera. Ever. In any world or universe.
I love the soft filter you used! It makes the OM-3 look like a beautiful Christmas present!
This comment section is funny and majority praise. Clearly the M43 bias is high. I have an OM1 and love it but this $2000 USD price point for the om3 is not it. OM doesnt grow market share with this. Its more $ than a Nikon ZF or Fuji xt50. Just doesnt make sense. Heck its more the same price as an OM1mk2 which is on sale. And you can get a om1mk1 for about $1000. This Looks awesome but MFT already has an image of being lesser than other sensors so convincing people to spend more $ is silly.
I mean lots of people with micro four thirds kits are watching videos about micro four thirds cameras. Bit like saying there's a lot of praise for a Sony camera from people that have Sony systems.
It is more expensive that a Zf... But I don't have lenses for a zf. So unless I say I'm going to sell everything, double the sizes of some of my lenses, still spend more money new for new comparison, then yes you could change systems, and you'd take great photos. Just like you can with this camera.
Just like I do with my 5Dii and my Eos film camera.
Ultimately why buy a Sony A1 when a z8 is cheaper... Well because you've got a million e mount lenses, and you might like Sony
@owenrodgers8020 yes but my Greater point is you don't earn new customers with this approach. OM and more importantly MFT need that. Which in turn helps us MFT fans. More excitement to the system gets more lens and cameras being made. This $2000 price is counter productive. Sure if you own MFT already it's a nice new option but it's not competitive (besides it's looks)
@@owenrodgers8020 The fact that we do own already many MFT lenses does make the OM3 neither cheaper nor better. It is about price/performance ratio. We would all love to see MFT market share to grow. But with these bad management decidons (only 2.36MP EVF & 2000€ body only), you are killing the system. No matter how retro the body looks, no matter how many MFT lenses we already have. Do you really want MFT to disappear?
@@dirk.4711 yup you get it. We need more fans , not catering to only the diminishing MFT crowd. Imagine if they priced this around $1399-1499, it would be flying off the shelves. But tbh it's just "ok" video performance sets it a step below many others
I see this camera addressing four markets:
- Existing MFT users.
- People who once used and loved a film Olympus OM1 or subsequent model, or a similarly small film SLR from another brand.
- FF camera users looking for a smaller, elegant ILC camera that doesn’t make them look too dorky in front of their kids.
- The kids if they are into retro gear and can’t get or don’t want a Fuji.
The first three categories are dominated by people (mostly men) by men over 40. They generally have access to enough cash to fund expenses hobbies if they put their mind to it.
It's a lot of camera in a neat package. I find the shape of the OM1 just fits my hand so won't be changing. Great review though.
No compromise and just 1 sd card slot? 😂
Yes... how many every day carry cameras can you name that have two SD slots 😂 not many. Get the OM1ii (or anything else!) If that's a deal breaker 🙈
Yes, but at least one micro sd slot, like the Nikon Zf @@MicroFourNerds
Great looking camera. I still have the 35mm film OM4 and an OM4Ti that I bought back in the 1980's.