The TALLEST BUILDINGS and FUTURE PROJECTS ► (3D Size Comparison)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ก.ย. 2024
- ► Tallest buildings / skyscrapers in the world today, represented to scale in New York City. Including some skyscrapers under construction and other extravagant futuristic projects.
Note: The chosen size is up to the tip, includes antennas. The video includes the 10 tallest buildings currently (complete buildings), the rest are elected subjectively. In the list are not included, structures as giant antennas, telecommunications towers, statues or monuments. Only buildings, skyscrapers and vertical cities.
🢂MY WEBSITES🢀
🔓JOIN: / @metaballstudios
📷Instagram: / metaballstudios_official
🐦Twitter: / metaballstudios
🙂Facebook: / metaballstudios
🎵MUSIC: (CC BY) The climb by @ScottBuckley - released under CC-BY 4.0. www.scottbuckley.com.au
📝SOURCES:
paste-bin.xyz/...
- Credits to Brady C. for using part of his work - 3dwarehouse.sk...
![[กูเพิ่งซื้อมึงปิดหนี] 20 นาที ผมรีวิวเกมที่แย่ที่สุดในโลก CONCORD](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/XhC-3q3Ii7I/mqdefault.jpg)
⭐ VR 360º version 👉 th-cam.com/video/oX1GrWeyPPM/w-d-xo.html
Note: The chosen size is up to the tip, includes antennas. The video includes the 10 tallest buildings currently (complete buildings), the rest are elected subjectively. In the list are not included, structures as giant antennas, telecommunications towers, statues or monuments. Only buildings, skyscrapers and vertical cities.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
⭐ Versión VR 360º 👉 th-cam.com/video/oX1GrWeyPPM/w-d-xo.html
Nota: El tamaño elegido es hasta la punta, incluye antenas. El video incluye los 10 edificios más altos actualmente (edificios terminados), el resto se eligen subjetivamente. En la lista no se incluyen, estructuras como antenas gigantes, torres de telecomunicaciones, estatuas o monumentos. Solo edificios, rascacielos y ciudades verticales.
Amazing!!!
Wait where are you from(?
❤️❤️
Tokyo is thinking big!!!
🎉🎉🎉
"How many visionary projects do you want?"
Tokyo: "YES"
Dubai: "maybe"
Ñ
@@ayudatengopiedrasenlosrino3786 Ñ
The only one of the last that counts is the one labeled "approved." Visionary project means someone just drew it up on an iPad.
Most of those projects are metabolism visions. There is a reason why that architectural movement died out - just too over the top
Imagine how insane of a skyline you'd get if all of these skyscraperss were in one massive city.
I will jump from there!
Skyline ? City ? The last one is taller than mount everest. How will you fit them in a city ?
@@mynk_rjpt in his toilet 🚽
the last buildings or will be smaller or it wont leave the paper project, even with modern engeniring and archtetic, there is a limit of heigh and area size in the mega city, the last building, put this in tokyo..........they re crazy just by being paid to imagine this xD the future building probably will be more functional, ecogreen and technological, not much bigger
@@user-im5wr8zs7u because their base is way smaller duh
I love how preposterous the designs get at the end. Like seriously, someone just went “what if we built a skyscraper so tall it reached the stratosphere”.
It also would literally be taller than Everest (the final tower).
and Everest as we are used to seeing it starts around 5000m at the base so it appears less than 4km high. a 10km high structure would be like nothing ever seen on Earth. The air would be so thin at the top you would likely pass out and die within 10 minutes if you went outside
@@bdonthebrat5021 yeah air would be thinner but probably there might be a plumbing system, not just for water but for oxygen. If it is possible for commercial jets to have a pressurized air cabin then we can make it work for astronomically high buildings.
It would be a good way to save on rocket fuel. The building could be used as a space elevator.
The point is, we won't be alive to see these finished builds
I actually really like the concept of a massive 1km tall obelisk-like building in Egypt
That building is a stunning design. The lighting of the corner details on the bottom half... it's really a striking building. It says it is slated to begin construction in 2024. I really hope they do it, because it is a remarkable design.
I really hope they do it, if you give me choice of this or that 10km tower, I choose this every day
Welcome to Egypt's Versailles, you may enjoy the glory of our new capital and building, but not for long.
Top 8
Luxe hotel
Location
Cagayan de Oro city
Philippines
Bhhgvvh
There were so many documentaries about Shimizu Mega city and XSeed 4000 when TH-cam was just starting. I'm actually surprised and quite nostalgic to see them in this list.
Same I remember fanboying over those when I first heard about it
@@lucakohlmayr4517 that Discovery Channel episode of (I think) Modern Marvels and the Shimizu Mega City Pyramid was awesome
These are indeed really awesome towers and builds, and I hope we get to see some of them get built in some... distant future. 😊
I may throw the Bionic Tower in here too. I first heard about it when I was a child (I heard about the Bionic even before hearing about Shimizu Mega Pyramid and the X-Seed), so it gave me nice Nostalgia vibes too. The Bionic Tower was the one which made me very interested in future skyscrapers and towers. 😊👍
@@maultiercolt3082 lol it's never happening. there's absolutely no need for humans to build such outrageously tall structures. not too mention it's probably impossible anyways
These things (content) seem to be recycling more and more. It’s great that they do- perhaps a younger more intelligent person will actually contribute.
Tokyo acting like they have all the land in the world for those projects
They’re plan is to build it in the bay. Like a floating city surrounded by another city. Kinda cool.
Tokyo (Sardine city )
@samantha ssmith Yeah lol. But remember, these are just concepts from years ago. They know they can’t afford to build them anytime soon so the “grand plan” is so far just on paper.
The Philippines: 👀
@samantha ssmith Ok yeah u do have a point there. Being one of the worlds biggest and most populated cities in the world comes with a cost.
That 10km building will need to be airtight like a spaceship with airlocks at a handful of floors. Otherwise people at the top are going to suffocate from lack of oxygen.
interesting note, lots of tall buildings are already running at positive pressure.
What about snow accumulating at highest levels? 🤔
Its not a building but the usa has something that is 20km. And no its not here ill take over 100 years to build.
@@TimeJudger Heating, sloped surfaces and runoff channels?
As they should
FYI, The Tokyo Babel tower's height is the cruising altitude of most airliners.
Imagine sitting on the observation deck of that and watching airliners go by BELOW you.
The thing has enough area to build an airport like 1/3 of the way UP the tower.
@@mycroft16 i mean it would be like 4 times larger than the largest mountain on the planet, it is a crazy idea. You would not be able to breathe at all on top.
@@bentownsend4017 Sure you would. You just wouldn't be able to have it open to the outside at that level. We've built things that sit significantly higher up and have people breathing just fine inside. Not saying it's easy, and there are far larger engineering issues than that one... but nothing technologically impossible.
@@mycroft16 yeah ok true. but that volume is almost unimaginably immense for a single project, and I think it's only something we should attempt if we sort every other issue on the planet first. Bring the materials from mars.
@@bentownsend4017 Oh absolutely. It's definitely not something we should be doing any time soon. And at some point it may actually be part of the solution to other problems. Who knows what crazy things humanity will do in the future. We are a species that loves to push boundaries. The Burj Khalifa was impossible not that long ago.
I love the Japanese's passion for making visionary projects. Good for you, Tokyo!
They already have a 634m and 333m tower but they didnt include it on the video
@life ?????they have a 333m and 634m skyscraper, they're both world-class towers my guy
These projects were dreamt up at a time when Japan had a growing population and booming economy. It has neither of those anymore. You can only justify such massive mega-projects if you have a HUUUGE population to begin with. Japan's population is expected to be halved by 2100. In fact the entire world is experiencing a demographic crunch as people stop having children in sufficient numbers to maintain population growth. Right now we have nearly 8 billion people, with the same population density as Afghanistan at 58 per square km. that's quite low since we have a TON of empty land to build on. America alone has enough empty, barren land to home billions of people. This isn't visionary, it's fucking megalomaniacal.
@@mlc4495 true. I highly doubt any of Japan’s visionary project will come true. The country’s economy is crumbling as well. And why would they want to build such a big eyesore in the first place?
@@nagaea7409 Tokyo skytree is not a building. It’s just a transmitting tower
Millennium Tower, Aeropolis 2001, Shimizu Mega City Pyramid, X-Seed 4000, and Tokyo Babel Tower are all projects that were planned or conceived during Japan's bubble economy around 1990. However, all of these projects are now frozen or gone, and there is no possibility of their realization. On the other hand, in Tokyo today, a 325-meter high skyscraper is under construction, which is expected to be completed the year after next.
Thank God! Tokyo didn't deserve to have buildings as ugly as these.
At least someone understands the truth of it. Thank you. Most of those projects were never intended to be actually built. Why they are included in a supposedly credible list of the world’s tallest buildings is beyond me. Ridiculous.
@@bumble.bee22 Fuck you, x-seed is beautiful
@@mensrea1251 Oh look, you again, how about you piss off already? people watching this channel WANT to see extreme scales, if you don't like it then go watch the 2d comparisons and nitpick _those_
Shimizu mega city piramid is actually supposed to be built, it wasn't designed to just remain on paper
The idea for new video: fictional walls size comparison.
You wanna get the ice wall from GoT don't you?
@@lingoteen and also walls from AoT)
@Nanowee “fictional”
Yea and not only show how tall they are but also how long the walls are I want to see the wall from attack on Titan I know that the wall is 50 meters tall I think
@@andriinaum1411 hey man, Reference is my favorite show
The first half: "Guys we need to go up, it's too crowded."
The last half: "We're not compensating for anything."
“Ryugyong Hotel, Pyongyang - Under Construction”
When has the Ryugyong Hotel NEVER not been Under Construction…?!
I think it's actually finished now?
@@AgeraXXX externally it looks that way but internally it is not finished
Actually finishing the building is probably too expensive for Kims dysfunctional regime. Absolutely pathetic, especially compared to the succes of the countries surrounding it.
@@haroeneissa790 Finishing the Ryugyong Hotel is going to be expensive for North Korea in general. It’s been under construction since 1987, when Kim Jung Un’s grandfather was still in charge of the DPRK
@@ZackRToler internally and the back side.
I’d love to see a video similar to this but with proposed, unbuilt and cancelled buildings.
Yeah it’d be cool to see the Chicago Spire in one of these
NUKE
@@btab2772 that was going to be my favorite building! Literally a giant beautiful drill , sucks it got canceled.
I mean, that is most of the Tokyo Visionary projects...
It's a shame Tokyo didn't just really go for it with a 50,000 meter pyramid that covers the whole city. Maybe with an airport at the top so planes don't even have to waste time descending. It's got as much chance at being built as one of the other two buildings that have multiple times more building material in them than all the rest of the buildings combined lol.
The problem comes into play with things like air pressure and temperature, also being affected by the weather. I think 10,000 or 15,000 feet is where the "death zone" begins for humans.
@@Major003 The Death Zone is anything above 26,000 feet. The city of La Riconada in Peru is about 16,000 feet elevation. Anyway any ultra tall buildings would be pressurized and climate controlled.
I heard the pyramid might be build in 2030. It couldn't be build at first because the metal wasn't strong enough for something so big.
Japan has an earthquake. So you can't build a tall building. And it can't be built into the Japanese economy right now. Japan is doomed.
@@happy-nb9jd A 10 km building like the Babel Tower will just shrug off any earthquake.
The X-Seed 4000, Shizimu Mega-City Pyramid, and the Tokyo Tower of Babel were all meant to be a methodical way to make a city inside a single building. That sounds weird, buildings inside a bigger building, but this was quite systematic because now, you can walk from your grandma's house on the other side of the city and stay in the same building. But no one wanted the idea of living in a city that has 1 building. Well, there's a town where everyone lives in 1 building. Its name is Whittier and it's in Alaska. But Whittier is just creepy. Unsurprisingly, no one wanted to spend more than the world's GDP on a 10,000-meter building that takes 150 years to build, so it wasn't built.
@@PotatoeSnow Yeah I know and it's insane
@@PotatoeSnow Neom poses too many problems and Saudi doesn't give a fuck about any of it lmao
Hey whittier is nice. It just got that nickname because the town only has like 200 inhabitants anyway. There are uncountable amounts of condominiums in cities with that much or way more people living in it and getting their everyday needs in it.
I guess with bigger projects like with tokyo, it begs the question why? What’s the advantage to cover a whole town with a building? So you can control the weather? Just doesn’t seem to outweigh the gigantic, exorbitant expense of work and money required to build that in the first place
What about the Aeropolis 2001?
Honestly, the Empire State building, even if it isn't the tallest, is the most impressive. The thing was built in the 30s in less than *one year* and still holds the record for length of time it was the tallest building in the world. Plus, the symbolic factor; since it was built during the depression and was so much taller than anything else, it was such a symbol of hope. Also it's probably the most durable of any building on the list and looks freaking dope.
Also, it's spire actually serves a useful purpose: as a mooring dock for airships. Which is also a very cool and unique feature.
about a year and two months
It's like the great great great grandparent of all architecture we see today i think
And will always be a symbol of hope.
@@kjj26k has it actually ever been used as an airship dock?
You forgot 2 towers from Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
1. The Exchange 106 tower (TRX) (completed) -
2. PNB 118 Tower (nearly completed and is going to be 2nd tallest tower in the world after Burj Khalifa)
Kuala Lumpur who?
@@mahesa_mp Malaysia
@@mahesa_mp Ignorance is the saddest
true 😓
awak salah..ni adalah bangunan yang pernah menjadi tertinggi didunia sahaja ,seperti klcc..klcc pernah menjadi bangunan tertinggi di dunia dari tahun 1996-2004..pnb hanyalah ke 2 tertinggi didunia..bukan no 1 paling tinggi didunia
Its crazy how Frank Lloyd Wright thought of "The Illinois" in 1956 when he was 89 years old, and now the very similarly-shaped Burj Khalifa is the tallest building in the world.
I remember seeing in another video that The Illinois was a direct inspiration for it! That said, it’s incredible how modern and timeless The Illinois looks.
As a Canadian it stings just a little to not see the CN Tower. I get that it's not really a building since there aren't floors, just the observation deck at the top, but it was the tallest free standing structure in the world for like 30 years.
It should tbh considering Dubai Creek is in it and its only supposed to hv 30 usable floors near the top.
There are lot's of beautiful Canadian Skyscrapers. There should be some on this list
@@Ipoop7colors Lol but none are tall enough. Canada has a lot of skyscrapers, only thing is they’re all short for some reason.
The CN Tower is not classed as a building it is a tower hence the name CN "Tower".
I love the CN tower when I was in Toronto
Well, I hope we get those hypothetic buildings in City Skyline at least!
By the time they get finished. People working on them will be dead.
@@circusbabysclaw7545 So like the pyramids
@@nadarith1044 yea
@@nadarith1044 So like the cathedrals
Tokyo Tower of Babel will likely crash the game
Even though Merdeka 118 is not the tallest but it is one of the tallest and should be in this video. it is 644m tall, it is still under construction but it is likely to be finish next year
Officials hv announced the height to be 678 meters tall.
678.19 m
You know those very large future buildings could be the kind of thing to build on other planets where many of the inhabitants would likely want to be under one giant roof since you would require a space suit to go outside. Another location a super large building might be preferred is in deathly freezing regions of the world where people live. Any place where going outside is not desirable.
And after that came the market crash as theres no demand for any of those projects , companies get smaller , home office , less need of space and workers.
Some of these are meant to be housing though
- Japan stars to build its Tower of Babel
- The humanity: Oh sh!t, here we gone again
Wow, fantastic renderings. I can see why there is debate on whether to include the antennae or not, as some of "taller" buildings were fairly underwhelming to their "shorter" predecessor
Most ambitious cities:
4 - Chicago, New York, San Francisco 🇺🇸
3 - Shanghai, Hong Kong 🇨🇳🇭🇰
2 - Dubai 🇦🇪
1 - Tokyo 🇯🇵
YOU FINALLY MADE IT COMPARISON BETWEEN TALLEST BUILDINGS IN HISTORY
I'm so exited about what's to come in the future!
I'm so excited how much like you will get in future!
i hope not skyscrapers are really unecasery just build abunch of commie blocks and youve improoved every side of living except looks just look up how much problems allone the burj kalifah causes in comparison to a normal high residential area with the same ammount of people in it
@@karlmarx9255 Yea it's tough to get excited for such structures. They are just penispills for oil sheiks and terrible for the environment. Imagine rooting for the .0001% to fuck up the planet more
@@hansolo631 Uh, it's everyday people who use the products the .0001% produce and sell so if you're mad about a fucked up planet look in the mirror.
@@hansolo631 Way to be a negative asshole bro good job
The animation is one of the best representation of the scale of man-made structures. Thanks Metaballstudios
I know right, especially when it's moving what happen next.
Last two buildings are taller then Japan's tallest mountain WTF!?!?!?!?!
They really might make x-seed4000
マジで作りそうｗ
何せ計画したグループ大成建設やったｗ
たまげたわｗ
the last building is taller than mount Everest (tallest mountain on earth)
Funniest part is japan doesnt even have a +300 building, many of other asian countries already reached +400
@@cabrakan4114 it's because of the earthquake
There was a proposal back in the early 20th Century where they suggested to build aerodromes that were on massive, concrete towers so they they were already at operating altitude for the aircraft of the day. Even for early biplanes, this would've been the equivalent of building an airport on top of stilts thousands of meters high.
what was the name of the project?
Para mi el mas sorprendente es el Empire State Building, una altura brutal en el año 1931!! los medios técnicos de entonces a todos los niveles eran ridículos!! me parece una salvajada que construyeran eso.
Y luego agregale que lo construyeron en 410 días, aprox fue 1 año y 2 meses es una pasada, en la actualidad en mi ciudad se tardan en hacer un edificio igual 3 años jaja, es una obra impresionante.
Sobrevalorado
@@ricardochavez1244 That´s a reality breakdown
@@uriellara1115 Para nada
@@ricardochavez1244 Cuál es tu ciudad ? En Latinoamérica no han hecho nada del alcance del ESB como para decir cuánto tardan en hacerlo .
Sadly most of the projects will never be created, they have been planned for years
Like The Illinois. No amount of Chicago corruption is gonna make that thing a reality. 🤣
Maybe they will, but we probably won’t live to see it.
@Григорий Григорьевич It is possible!!
@@VinnyLam nah. They've confirmed a lot of them won't be built. I believe the XSeed 400 was even a publicity stunt, which the company even admitted.
@@whiskii Yeah things like the XSEED4000 will just never happen. I dont even think we got the engineering for something like that
Jeez Tokyo is just gonna be one big skyscraper in the future
Even though it would have been the smallest building on this list at 205m, I would have loved to see the Singer Tower in New York which stood as the tallest building on Earth from 1908-1909. Demolished in 1969
P.S. excellent video! The speed and quality you make these are astounding!
Other honorable mention is the costanera center which stands in Santiago Chile as the tallest building in South America.
I saw a video on the singer not long ago. Was a beautiful building for sure
I was such a unique looking building it is a shame its gone.
@@obinnaobiekwe4910 the singer was an office building but with its obscure slender tower it was built out of time for the more modern day office demands of the 60s 70s. Building a straight based tower based on the orignal "fat" singer base created far more space. One liberty plaza that replaced it has virtually an acre of space per floor. Ironic thing is with the introduction of the internet + covid, office working has now moved to being mainly done from home, making buildings like one lib plaza redundant anyway 🤷🏽♂️
damn tokyo really going crazy with those buildings xD
Next Gundam
The architectural concept of Tokyo was created 30 years ago, and the construction period is said to be 120 years. Also, if these buildings are built, nearly 40% of Tokyo will be used for only one building, which is practically impossible.
@@user-hk4ws4ud6o I agree. All those buildings will exist only in the imagination and is complete fiction!
wtf? Tokyo might try to build the death star at some point
Rip WTC 1:33 we will always remember you
3:35 OMG 😱
3:15 Lol, Dubai trying to make a comeback
Excelente trabajo!!!! Una sorpresa que la torre de mi ciudad apareciera en el video!!! Saludos desde Monterrey, Mexico 🇲🇽
Así es 😗👍🏼
Tiene un diseño genial tambien!
🦧🦧🦧🦧🦧
Orgulloso de ser de esa ciudad.
Fierro pariente 🤠🤙🔥
As we near the end of 2022, I'm confident that Burj Dubai is going to remain the tallest in the world for some time. All others are "dreamy" and most probably not going to ever happen. As for the Jeddah (Kingdom) tower, it appears to have stalled construction or is fully abandoned.
True. Anything after the Jeddah is fantasy.
I can totally imagine the last one being built in 1000 years.
Agree
They've resumed construction on the KSA Jeddah Tower recently, pretty stoked!
This is it guys, we're getting into the Blade Runner Era!
And we are running late... The movie was set in 2019...
After playing Yakuza games the freaken Millennium tower is gonna gonna be a real thing.
10 years in the joint
I remember skyscrapers being drawn up in comparison pictures of the Titanic or the Seawise Giant. If some of these hypothetical ever got built they'd have to draw them next to Star Destroyers instead.
Just remember that every single building on here was a visionary project at one point. People thought the Empire State Building was impossible. People thought the Burj Khalifa was impossible. And here we are with a 1km tall Obelisk approved and starting construction next year. When metaBallStudios does their video in 50 years... which of these "impossible" ideas will end up being reality, and what things that we can't even imagine will have been built.
Sad to see that the Jeddah tower is still in development but on hold for financial reasons it will be nearly 1000m probably will be finished in 2027
@@__.111. corruption from the private company that is in charge of the Jeddah Tower project is the main culprit for it's delays sadly...
Well you'd be glad to hear that construction has resumed recently! I'm pretty stoked about it!@@__.111.
2:58 a wild godzilla appears
Lol
Tokyo Tower of Babel?
I've got a bad feeling about this.
Gonna need Jesus second coming to wipe that shit out.
@@thatperformer3879 Yoo, you ain’t lying😂😂💀💀
I'm an Indian and i feel very sad after seeing NYC's WTC @1:40.
素晴らしい完成度とCG技術だと思います‼️現実性かと変わらないくらいリアルです‼️
This was so well made and crafted, thank you for making this!!!! When One WTC started rising on it's actual site I literally teared up and I usually don't, very powerful
I was worried that no one but me had noticed that One WTC was in its actual and proper location.
The old twin towers should've been right next to the new one wtc too
I always thought that a building's height counting its spire is "cheating", I think its height should be up to its usable space. I'll accept the Empire State Building spire because it was meant as a mooring dock for airships but a spire just to be taller? That's just lame
Yeah !! There’s a rule in place that a spire cannot be more than half of a building’s height. I commented that this list is kinda wonky because there are buildings that are either shorter and/or taller based on their roof and/or architectural/spire/ decorative heights !
@@ascott2168 especially when they are placed side-by-side like here, I can see, sure it's taller because of the spire but if I look at it as a whole, it looks shorter because I don't really think of the spire as part of the building when judging its height
@@lunatickgeo When it comes to building heights, my thing is how high can people go safely, without safety equipment & stand on both feet with the ESB being the exception !
@@ascott2168 same
Burj Khalifa would be only around 600-700 meters if the skyscraper's spire is removed. Also, there will be a skyscraper in Malaysia that will be completed in the next year considering the project is almost finished. I think the height is around 650-700 meters. It's also have a spire, a long one. But still, the whole spire is an usable space, because the spire is meant to be an observatory deck.
Nice to see a Mexican tower in this list, hope soon Rise Tower (400mts) start the building in Monterrey!
The ones with the big antennas on them annoy me. They don't count in my book.
Fantastic video, I am fascinated, I look forward to it, thanks for the effort and quality;)
How can you like this video already after just 1 minute of uploading while the video is 4 minutes long. Something is not right here..
Shimizu Tower would be really cool cause it's not made just to be tall but made for natural disasters in mind and Japan really needs it. Probably won't happen as envisioned though.
According to some sites, shimzu tower will supposedly start being built in 2030 and will be finished in 2110, which is a shame, cuz you and me won't be able to see this building that will completely change the image of Tokyo.
@@just_another_internet_man755 Taking into account the current situation in Japan, it is almost impossible for such a structure to be built.
@@nateriveer_8590 If Japan changes their policy on immigration, there's a high chance we will see the shimizu pyramid being built. The xseed 4000 and tokyo tower of babel is impossible tho.
@@jisooislove988 it's possible, but it's currently easier for a project of this size to be built in China
@@jisooislove988 Impossible.... Japan has limited land for such a huge object so you have to build it where people already live. That means that you have to destroy thousands of perfectly fine buildings, relocate people to other parts of the country cus you removed the housing in the place where they lived and hope that you have enought money, hands and time to finish the giant project you have started. Then you also have to hope that people actually wanna move back to the place from where they had to move in the first place, cus while that thing was being build, other parts of the country was being developed into something else that people actually learned to live in. All that is just too huge a risk. Remember that in order to go all Akira, Tokyo has to be destroyed first.
0:13 estamos lejos de la meta pero es un buen inicio! Ojalá Torre Rise ya empiece construcción el próximo año (440 metros) 🇲🇽🏙
Así es hermano. 🇲🇽👍
ya salio nueva información, entrevistaron a los empresarios y dieron más información, medirá 456 metros
@@lawea4477 Cómo no y le aumentarán la altura, para que superara a la que se va construir en Balneario Camboriú, Brasil, tendrá más de 500 metros.
al menos esta vez salimos en algo gggg........bendiciones a mexico y a los regios.
VIVA MÉXICO! saludos desde Venezuela
They missed out my "visionary" tower which will be 50,000m tall.
1:52 "Hey flin, I need you to go there and Ping An Identical Fixing Component"
Once in my childhood I drew a tower 100 km high, it should be the first. I will apply for my visionary project.
By the way, thanks to the author for such a beautiful comparison, it's always interesting.
why not put the TRX building and the PNB 118 building together? that also includes future buildings located in malaysia 🇲🇾
Thats building is not populer bro
Imagine some dude trying to end his life by jumping off the Tower of Babel and it takes him like 10 minutes to get to the bottom
Early by few days. Just yesterday Merdeka Tower 118 in Kuala Lumpur, claimed the 2nd highest building in the world, at 678.9m
Video suggestion : underground buildings, not deepest mines, but underground utilised spaces, be it houses, shopping centres, bases, etc.
I'm concerned that those really big ones at the end are mostly in earthquake zones! San Francisco and Tokyo. Really?! Great video as always MBS! 😊👍
As if an earthquake could do harm to what is essentially an over-engineered artificial mountain
seriously the engineering needed for them to sustain their own weight and wind would make them close to untouchable alone
These towers would definitely survive any earthquake, tsunami and the like 😉
I think there would be an ultra-advanced safety technique inside them to keep them stable 😁
No earthquake can demolish a 2-D plan on paper sitting in a drawer.
@@itsm3th3b33 Ha Ha smartass
@@itsm3th3b33 Unless the paper tears
2:26 Malaysia people: WTH Where is merdeka PNB118???
Metaballstudio: Ummm We forgot to added it Lol 😂
0:13 esa torre siempre la veía cuando salía de la prepa
Awesome! Love to see these proposed towers and 'scrapers in here too 😊👍
The Bionic Tower gave me some Nostalgia vibes, as it was the first "proposed" tower I heard of and made me a fan of tall buildings in general. I'm happy to see it in here too 😁
But: I think I would need to be set asleep and frozen in for ages if I wanna see the uncancelled, proposed buildings get built in reality 😁
3:08 : the Real life counterpart of the NERV undergroud HQs most iconic pyramid present in the Evangelion Proyect!!!!!
Nice video. Saludos cordiales desde México
One part isn’t accurate, the old World Trade Center was shorter than Sears tower. When the WTC was first built, it was the tallest building in the world for a very short time until the Sears tower took its place.
Wrong its like 1,400+ feet the North Tower with the antenna was 1,700+
@@rilynjohnson3297 structurally
@@Daryl_Phillips_ The vid is completely accurate since the vid's description explicitly said the heights included antennas, not just the structure. I think your way of looking at it makes more sense, but that's not how this was done (and not how "tallest buildings" are apparently _ever_ ranked, for some reason). I'd love to see a ranking that excluded non-inhabitable add-ons (like antennas) from the heights, but I've never seen one.
La Torre Obispado el rascacielos más alto de México y Latinoamérica apareció en el video
First you admire ... and then you ask yourself: "Is it really necessary?"
Yeah around the Shanghai Tower and the Burj Khalifa, I was just kinda like "impressive but why?" Then I saw the Bionic and the Illinois, and I was just like "okay now we're either compensating something, or we're just doing it for the sake of it." Like I get it countries, your economy is nice and big, you don't need a massive tower to prove it. And then I saw Aeropolis 2001, and I was like "forget this this is science fiction. That one building would be a whole damn city." Tokyo Tower of Babel may as well just be called "space elevator."
2:09 Hello, should be PNB118 place between Shanghai Tower & Burj Khalifa..official height (with spire ofc) is 678.9m..
Lotte world tower and one world trade center is so eyecatching for me idk why
I wouldn't step foot inside the Tower of Babel.
God himself would probably knock that structure down. It is awfully concerning Japan plans to build literal dystopian buildings straight out of the worst sci-fi in which humanity is suffering in those movies and nobody seems to bat an eye.
Amazing how all the modern building all basically look the same (glass spikes), and then you get to the Abraj Al Bait, which is just stunning *and* massive.
Wow I love this channel. Beautifully done.
“How tall do you want your buildings to be?”
Tokyo: *Yes.*
The Illinois is an amazing concept. A nod to America and Chicago ultimately kicking off the skyscraper craze. Even though most skyscrapers exist outside of America now and days
No, the US still has the most skyscrapers. (For one, we have the most metropolises which helps.) Those other countries just have a few anomalies that stand taller than ours.
The X-seed 4000 is literally a city in a enormous building that is 4 km High.
Still, the story of the Tower of Babel did not teach people anything)
Very good video, you could have put the Hermitage project (in project) and the Link Tower (under construction) for France too
Courscant after seeing this video:
"Hold my death sticks"
The square cube law probably means that buildings taller than 1000m are unfeasible/impossible. They simply won't be strong enough to stand on their own.
It’s actually not impossible because the reason why the base of the building is so big so it could not be able to fall. That’s how the tallest building today is not able to fall because they use that method.
Lol what, a typical mountain has structural integrity of a pile of rocks and dirt and achieves enormous heights with many times the mass compared to what a similarly sized building would have yet they don't collapse
buildings like X-seed are completely possible they're just very costly
@@nadarith1044 Mountains are completely solid and are literally part of Earth. Buildings are not.
@@still_guns Rock has less load bearing capability than metal and geological processes make no mass savings by planning out the mountain beforehand, they also aren't a part of the earth, they're only of the earth, they're enormous structures of rock and dirt that jut out off the surface
this isn't a fantasy world where mountains and earth are a single object because they share an element ffs, mountains have no magical exemption from adhering to the same laws of physics everything else standing on the surface does
-the fact that you were even upvoted makes me lose faith in humanity- too harsh sorry
@@nadarith1044 I'm sorry you feel that way. I like to think that I know my stuff, but in this case it seems I might be wrong. I do recall reading somewhere that 1000m plus buildings are unfeasible, but think I might have been wrong with the square cube law.
Obispado tower +305.3m 💪😎🤙
Later --->
Santander tower +316m 🤑🙏
Royal forest district tower +360m 🧐🍷🎩
Rise tower +440m 💪😎🤙
Ascendant México ❤️🇲🇽❤️
I like how the Willis tower is the tallest building from a really long time ago, that is still standing
Why didn't you include the Merdeka 118 in Malaysia? It's a crime to list tall buildings and not include it as it will be the second highest building in 2022.
I really have but one question: Myself having been to Tokyo and knowing the utter lack of unused real estate in Tokyo City where on earth would they find the open space to build the base of a tower that reaches six miles in the sky! Not unless they were to flatten the gorgeous mountainous terrain on the outskirts. The buildings are beautiful though…
Tokyo bay
There have been plans to use the Tokyo Bay, much like Dubai makes man-made islands or how the Netherlands has reclaimed territory from the sea. Of course, we'll have to wait and see (pun unintended) what the future holds for these projects.
@@Manuel1112221 I'm not entirely sure if you'd even need land reclamation for something that big, i'm not even sure if land reclamation would even make sense here
it could very well have its foundation built directly into the sea bed, it could in fact REQUIRE it as its enormous mass and related subsidence problems may preclude building the foundation on anything else than solid bedrock
a structure this big would actually cause significant earthquakes because it's mass would cause a shift in the crust beneath it as the planetary surface readjusts itself for the sudden existence of an entirely new _mountain_
It’s a publicity stunt. Even the companies involved admitted it as such. Ridiculous list.
@@mensrea1251 And that pertains to this discussion how exactly? we are talking about massive arcologies in general and where you would build them if you had to, not about how x-seed was supposed to be build because we know it wasn't
and why it is a ridiculous list? because it includes visionary concepts never supposed to be build? x-seed for example was also supposed to encourage discussion of more unusual and unconventional projects, which it succeded at and still sparks such discussions even today, like here for example
stop trying to drag everyone down with your mediocrity
Quite interesting many of the Chinese towers don’t need a “staff” to “boost” their height. (Maybe just because building today no longer chase the “Empire State Building” aesthetic)
Shanghai Tower’s public observation deck is actually the tallest in the world despite being shorter than Burj Khalifa. You can also ride the “fastest elevator in the world” and see the mass damper on top.
Burj Khalifa was going to be 1000 meters tall, but financial and structural challenges made them changed the height to something shorter as it is now.
Burj Khalifa doesn't have a "staff" to boost it's height tho. It's 200 meters taller than the Shanghai tower and that's basically all maintenance floors, with actual equipment in them. It's observation deck is only 6 meters lower than Shanghai Tower's.
Burj Khalifa has maintanence floors andthe top and is actually part of the design unlike Q1 which is just adding a stick to make it taller. Willis tower is the worst offender with it's antenae.
@@SuzanoSho but Shanghai tower don't have spike if you remove that spike Shanghai tower automatically becomes taller
Wait I thought the fastest elevator was in a mine in South Africa
@@mj-nc2iz 1. It's not an antanae
2. It's actually part of the design it just looks kinda ugly
Guys your not gunna believe this but I think Tokyo wants big buildings
When a building has it's own gravitational pull.
Egypt now has tallest buildings in Africa
*Iconic Tower (Iconia) 387 m*
*Nile Tower Hotel 300 m*
*Son and father tower 270 m*
*Alameen Iconic Tower 250 m*
*Nile business towers (4) 235 m*
*Al Alameen Towers (6) 200 m*
*The Gate (2) 180m*
and the tallest in the future will be :
*Oblisco Capitale 1000 m*
They built all that in a couple years? Dang that was fast
Seem kind of short by comparison.
This really illustrates what a scam "tallest" can be with spires, spikes, and decorative fluff overtaking rooftops and occupied floors. Thanks for acknowledging that the 83rd floor of the Petronas Twin Towers would be in the shade of the Big Willy :)
US is The Master in this regard lol…. Puffed up ego
As far as I am concerned a building's height is its highest occupiable floor. Everything above that is vanity height.
Notice that this video is not in correct order bruh
central park tower is taller than sears tower in roof height so thats also another thing
@@JonMartinYXD Surely the roof above the "highest occupiable floor" should count. If it didn't have one, would the highest floor really be occupiable?
I like how it actually tells how tall they are in order
Love this guy’s channel. Should literally have 10 times the amount of subs he does.
I don't think so... Rubbish channel
@@herihazril says your channel 😂😂😂
I'm interested by the size difference between the Twin Towers and the building that replaced them.
One world trade is the same roof height as the north tower was at 1368ft. The antenna is about 30ft higher then the north tower’s antenna. Almost exact same sized building as the twin towers
@@desertvalleyfilms9136 What about volume?
That building never replaced them, it barely stand out.
@@WolfEpsilon bruh its named after the twin towers. That came before it.
@@desertvalleyfilms9136 The tapering effect 1WTC has, tho. Same floor height, less floor space, and also only one of them.
Dubai City Tower looks pretty. I know I'll never see it in my lifetime, but it's pretty. Glad they're building something taller at the moment, it's also very pretty
I think the feasibility of Tokyo is very high, Japan has always wanted to develop to the sky, the possibility of X-seed will be relatively large.
It may be feasible to construct but not practical in reality. It takes a lot of energy to pump water to the top and the pipes used for toilet sewerage last roughly 100 years. I would rather see a structure built that is more resistant to mould and can last for 1000 years. Modern buildings get demolished within 100 years.