New Corners And Splits Roulette By Eisenberg
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ต.ค. 2024
- 3/1 4/1 4/2. 5/2. 7/3. 9/4. 11 /5. 15/7. 18/8. 24/12. 30/14. 38/18. 50/24
How to win big money at the Casino playing Roulette with new strategies tested at 9am every day. Use Martingale, outside bets, straight up, streets, six lines, splits, with bankrolls to fit every budget. Subscribers are encouraged to share their ideas and The Roulette Master will share and test them in new videos. Messages are answered promptly and are encouraged. Please Subscribe!! Turn on notifications!! Share content!!
For those who don't have a single 0 wheel available at your casino, the numbers I recommend on a 00 wheel are 17,18,20,21 corner, 5/6 and 32/33 split. This will give you 4 consecutive #'s on the wheel at opposite ends.
I remember you featured this one around the same time last year using $1 bets - good to see it again though. It can be quite profitable
@@kundaliniknight Yea, I sent it to a different group when I developed it last September. It has been my go to system and has been good to me so I thought I would share it with this group. I personally use $1 units and have even used 50 cent units as I like to have a reasonable bankroll.
I wait for numbers to miss 10 times and start the progression. It usually works but once it went missing for 29 spins. This probably occurs once in thousands spins.
Good thought. Usually if I go through the progression without hitting, one of the #'s will hit within the next few spins. I don't recall it ever going another 10 spins without a hit so I may incorporate that when I play. Excellent suggestion.
I think double the coverage (16 numbers) might work better.
I modified this to using four 3 number streets. So you get 12 number coverage. and 2 spins before adding to the bets.
I hit many times and you only need to go 1 up on a progression. Can also play all 8 or 12 numbers straight up and not have to use the progression.
Great thank you for sharing
Hi Randall I tested your bracket challenge on 1000 bets and it was a shocking fail.
The 2nd column and 2nd doz? Was not for long play. $200 target in 10 min. Average is $300. should not be played long term or yes it will fail
Hey RM,
Have you tried modifying the progression to maybe 20 instead of the current 13?
Interesting strategy, but ultimately a kamikaze system. The question is, can the player manage the losses against the wins in such a way to remain profitable. Perhaps vary the denomination after a win to extend play, preserve wins (and stress levels).
Hey there! Here’s a good strat id like u to try of u havent already
6 chips on 2nd 12 and 3rd 12
1 chip on 7-4 split, 2-5 split, 6-9 split and 8-11 split!
Total bet:16 chips
Total profit:2 chips
On loss: 10x the bet
On win: reset
Thank you for sharing
A modification to this strategy if you don't like the idea of risking $ needed to play the entire progression is to play the progression from your winnings when you hit. For example, playing $1 units you would make the minimum $5 bet until you hit. If you hit the split you would play the first 3 progressions with the $18 winnings. If you hit the corner, you would play the first 4 progressions with your $27 winnings. You would continue to do that with each hit until you build this separate bank up to 60 or so units. At that point you would bank that money to your main bank and start over with the $5 bets repeating the process. You basically have 2 separate banks, the main bank you had from the beginning, and the bank being played from your win. This modification does require a lot more patience and a slower build up of your main bank but has worked for me. The big positive is you can start with a smaller bank of your choice without risking the $420 needed for the progression. Personally, I start with a $100 bank when playing with this modification.
Thanks for sharing!!
@@louvannicola713 Could do that but it would be similar to dozen bets and would require a larger bankroll. Payout progression wins would be smaller but you would win more often. I'll see what I can do.
Do you do this on a live table or an electronic table game?
@@EnglishMercenary I play at the casino on an electronic table linked to the live dealer. The numbers are spun by the live dealer and the results and bank are maintained electronically. $5 minimum at playing electronically and $15 minimum playing with chips at the table.
Hey RM. What Roulette program are you using?
Roulette royale
@@pcgamer7507 any chance for a link for desktop version
Roulette Royale
Basically you are betting on 8 numbers, and you can change the progression.
if you were to bet 8 numbers i would bet 8 consecutive numbers on the wheel such as 5/7/11/17/20/26/30/32
You rarely show the losses when they are multiple losses in a row.
Only 2 of the 8 numbers are red. Might sting if these two are cold during a long red streak.
Actually didn't realize that until I saw this comment. Good catch. The #'s you use are not set in stone. I personally prefer #'s close to each other in 2 sections of the wheel but the choice is yours. This system has been very good to me and is the one I use the most. Started using it last September. I do use $1 or even 50 cent units when playing on line as I don't use a bank that's over $500. The recent system that has also been good to me is Robert's system of playing the opposite 3rds of the last 3 that hit. I did modify that by also using the columns. I have yet to have the 3rds or same column hit 7 times in a row which is what needed to bust on that system. Thank you, Robert, for that one.
@@jeffreyisenberg830 thanks Jeffrey
i would cash out at 250 or more in profit and start all over
Thanks for the great modification
Don't like this one, the progression makes no sense and you could easily reach the table limits on inside bets. Those aren't even consecutive numbers on the wheel. 👎👎
Unable to come up with 4 neighbors on opposite side of wheel on single 0. 4 of 5 neighbors on each side. Does work on 00 wheel with 4 neighbors on each side splitting 5/6, 32/33 and 17,18,20,21 corner.
RM................sorry to say....this is terrible..i mean, you got lucky to get to +300, but covering so few numbers is scary
Thank you for your honest feedback
@@TheRouletteMaster of course..thank YOU............hey, are you playing this on a PC???? I want to practice on my computer...do you have a link for the game ??