@Lucifer-pn6ni yes it does. And evey culture exists to witness that the whole world was flooded. Call witnesses flat earther isn't intelligent at all no?
@Lucifer-pn6ni lucifer, do you live in a box? Your cultural perspective against world wide flood is your own perspective. It isn't the all to end all. To rule out what my culture says there was a world wide flood isn't intelligent at all. It is actually arrogance. My culture isn't even Christianity first of all. Most indigenous cultures who had these story outside of your box didn't even know Christianity existed when they began passing these stories down from generation to generation. Your little box, is so tiny, it can't fit all the other world views that has nothing to do with Christianity, that the world was once flooded. It is actually a minor view of which you are trying to deceive others. Maybe in your little box world, it didn't flood there. But to the rest of the world, who doesn't know you nor have social media, there was a world wide flood. And that story has been passed down from generations to generations.
@@theotherguy3083 well know every culture that exists is not witnessed the whole world was flooded because that has never happened. We know for a FACT that the entirety of human history, the earth has never been completely flooded. It's a myth. What we do know, is that many ancient cultures, when they suffered from floods, especially cataclysmic floods, those floods became part of their mythology and that warped all the telephone gain into becoming not just a local cataclysmic event but a worldwide cataclysmic event. Of course these were ancient people who were ignorant of the world around them and had no idea that while devastating to them what happened to them was only local and not worldwide. So, since the facts demonstrate there was no worldwide flood all those people in all those different civilizations that thought it was, are simply wrong
His point is that if you live on the mountains, a local flood won’t get you, so how would a “local flood” story go to a mountain-covering one? Also the flat earth comment was because you compared them to a flat earther. “ the same way flat earth theories form” or something to that effect
I took a tour of Mt Helens in WA and the tour guide was commenting on how all the experts were shocked at how much material was washed away in such a short amount of time.
@Fred the 47th and people spent their entire lives studying volcanology likely never saw an explosion and aftermath quite like Mt. St. Helen’s. So yes, it is still perfectly normal to witness such a monumental event. I am still superior.
@Fred the 47th oh really? Having studied under an even more renowned volcanologist, I’m laughing at you. So am I to understand that a volcanologist, who had never seen an eruption like the one at Mt. St. Helen’s before in their lives, weren’t impressed by just how large a scale the eruption was? Why? Because they are volcanologists?
@Fred the 47th incorrect. It’s quite well-known. Now unless you can point out active and extinct volcanoes covering *every square inch of the planet doing the exact same thing,* this is just a phenomenon which is quite well-documented. The resulting landslide and the mini chasms they caused, the “layers”. But of course, you’re still stuck in 1982 and the “prominent geologist” you claim to have mentored you is more than likely to be grifter Snivelling Snelling.
Before Noah flood rain never fell from the sky it came from the ground like fog. If you want to know where the water came from look at what a atmospheric river is this will explain some of the questions that are being asked. This doesn't answer the whole question but it gives us a better understanding of alot of these questions.
When I was young, a group of friends rode our horses to the top of a 9,500 ft mountain in northern Utah. We were surprised to find petrified fish, palm fronds, and other things embedded in the rocks on top. I immediately thought of the flood. A few years later found me digging swimming pools in the hills of Northern California east of Oakland. After digging 12 feet through untouched rock, sand, etc. I found a large piece of green glass finely manufactured. Again, the flood came to my mind. In my view, these things happened with sudden force and powerful movements, not erosion over millions of years. Intellectual pride makes it very difficult for the ‘learned’ to ever accept these observations.
You assume the earth was always the way you view it today. Landscapes change drastically mountains erode and sea floors get pushed up to become mountains
@@kingsknight2112 Of course the earth changes, however, I do not agree with a sphere billions of years old. I stand by my stories and opinion. Thank you.
As a Southerner, I have to question what you mean by "blessed"? Around here "Bless your little heart" isn't a wish for your prosperity, but an insult to your intelligence.
@@maxbennett5412 Not at all. I find that believing things that are evidently true, and pointing out things that are NOT evidently true is very important.
@@atworldsend818 Exactly. Did you know Lucy, supposedly some of the greatest evidence for human evolution, had their bones found in a 50 mile radius? Really sounds more like they just took a bunch of bones and stuck them together. And if you are looking for solid evidence did you even watch the video?
@@atworldsend818 If you're from the South and don't know the difference between "Have a blessed day" and "Bless your little heart", then I'd say that makes you a pretty special person😀
@@tiredofliars His " College friend " probably works for the mutli trillion dollar oil and gas industry and uses the Bible for discovering reserves for exploration. Sort of like a miracle
@@imafeltersnatch7634 yes because if something disagrees with the theory of everything from nothing, then surely the petroleum industry has catapulted the propaganda into the feeble minds of the public.
You poor souls. The type to believe a book in a school and deny the intelligence of of a obvious creator. The Egyptian's built the pyramids 4k years ago with bronze too.🙄
I think that's great that you expanded into Canada also. God has left so much evidence that he exists and that he is the creator of all things. I knew this even before I was a believer, at 34, because the evidence is there and it would take way too much Faith to believe I evolved out of bacteria in a mud pile that got hit by lightning. God even tells us in Romans chapter 1 and 2 that mankind is without excuse because creation itself can be seen and clearly testifies of God's beauty and His existence.
This is actually an old video, he has been lying for Jesus for a long time at AIG Canada. They just cleaned it up a bit and put in a click bait icon for it.
This is by far the best video on this topic its straight and to the point! Thank you so much for posting this I shared it with one of my friends!! :) To God be the Glory!!!
I so agree!!! I originally watched this months ago, well worth watching again. There are some great comments from people here worth reading & learning from too.
@@sydney.g.sloangammagee8181 Well . . . . you are WRONG!!!!!! Just because some babble agrees with your childish beliefs does not make it correct. I suggest you grow up, educate yourself, and cease being so ignorant !
This is the most stupid explanation I’ve ever heard. It’s completely devoid of evidence and fact. And any educated person understands that. Faith makes people stupid.
If you’re convinced of this video, watch “Atheist Answers #43: The Biblical Flood is Supported by Science” by Underlings. If you’re open-minded, of course.
@@jamesmorgan2064 Please explain what your god has done? Stand by and watch people being raped? Creating childhood cancer? Wiping out humanity because your god made a mistake?
I can honestly say that I have never doubted the account ( it's not a "story " like some fairy tale!) in scripture. As a child I was raised in church, Baptist, so in innocence I believed it. As an adult, I know about the fossil record ,things being found on mountain tops etc. So many forget it wasn't just rain,but the " fountains of the deep " being " broken up ". A LOT and LOTS of water!!! Bless you all!
Not to mention the WINDOWS OF THE FIRMAMENT being opened and all the waters beyond heaven came rushing down also! We KNOW according to the bible, that the firmament is above heaven, and holds back the waters beyond. And the stars are holes through the veil of Heaven allowing the Hosts of heaven to look down on us, right? The Firmament was described as an inverted bowl, and below that bowl is Heaven, and below that the clouds, and below that the mountain tops, where god resided while he wrote the ten commandments, which were destroyed in mere moments, but no matter, we still have the Stele of Hammurabi that was merely MAN MADE from two thousand years before that event that has many of the same commandments, or laws as those that god gave to Moses on fragile tablets that couldn't last a month! LOL! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@tiredofliars Hi!! Yes I was aware of this part of the scripture. I " type " with my fore finger. It is slow and my arthritic hand doesn't like it. GOD bless you!
@@michaeldriskell2038 Doesn't your god give you the power of healing? It states it clearly in the NEW TESTAMENT that those who believe would be able to perform healing, so, I guess you are simply not a TRUE believer, UNDERSTOOD!
"Lots and lots of water"!?!? Where is it now? How many human fossils are there in these fossil beds, or where the humans to stupid to go to higher ground with the animals? I swear, it's like you don't even try to logic.😵💫
I lived in a spot in upstate New York where we live about a 150' Above a river. You could walk back Behind our house in the woods and there were these large flat rocks on the ground. There were all sorts of fish fossils in the rocks!
I've lived in two locations where there are shell fossils. The first were displacement fossils where the shells were dissolved away and the cavity infilled with sand and muds - now rock - we broke some and found they were like plaster casts. The other location had shells that were gone and there were just water filled cavities that we could have filled with plaster.
@meyokkob458 we attended a small Christian school, so one day we took the entire high school like (20 😂) and the teacher, of course, back into the woods to show them for our science class.. it was pretty neat. I'd love to go back and find them again with today's phone cameras after 30yrs. I could get some pretty awesome pictures. I still remember it and am pretty sure I could easily find them.
@@lhood8263well since you’re the medical expert, tell me what diseases they were battling and what mutations did they carry in the dna in Noah’s time??? Probably nothing like what we have to deal with today seeing as most disease is man made… or curable or treatable but if they were closer to creation where there was no death and disease you tell me… also there comes a point in time where God no longer dwells with man and drastically cuts the years of life from who knows down to 120… kinda makes sense when you consider not very many people if any cross that line today and this was written thousands of years before any dr was around… also the Bible says clearly the life is in the blood… pretty scientific for a book that supposedly has nothing to do with science… time space and matter are literally dealt with in the first book of the Bible… you have a hard time believing Noah was 950 and you want me to believe the universe came from nothing and is 4.8 billion years old??? Come on man what’s a stretch???
@@lhood8263 If it can still be found...you may want to look up an old Scientific American article regarding how they developed greatly extended lifespans in fruit flies, by preventing them from mating 'til a much greater age. Those that were genetically unfit were eliminated from the gene pool if they didn't make it to the new mating age imposed by the scientists. Those that were genetically fit enough passed on their good genes to the next generation. Now, back to your question - look at the ages at which the anti-deluvian patriarchs were having kids, and not just the ages at which they died. Do you see a connection to that and the fruit fly experiment. In addition, consider that God would've created Adam and Eve genetically perfect, and it would've taken a bit of time for mutations to build up and become deleterious to the point of drastically reducing their lifespans, not to mention that in their pre-industrial times they properly had a lot fewer mutagens around. All these taken together, it's not all that implausible that they lived to considerably longer ages than we do.
@@CGoldmill-dz4gk also the Bible says clearly the life is in the blood… pretty scientific for a book that supposedly has nothing to do with science. Hardly scientific at all, anyone idiot can see a person bleeding and die and conclude that blood and life are related. And btw, all the other nonsense you said is just that, nonsense. Provide evidence for any of it if you want to be taken seriously.
@@frankcardano4142 Evolutionism was debunked over a century ago by Darwin's own contemporaries. Open any geology book and you'll find erosion which evos don't belive in order to hold on to their stories.
@@dokidokibibleclub Which contemporary? The only naysayers of his time were Christian geologists who gave up trying to fit the flood narrative with the rock layers that were definitely showing vast periods of time. By the mid 1800’s, a global flood and a young earth were discounted as mythological. Only in the 1960’s did a handful of deceitful fundamentalists peddle cherry picked quote mines to distort the science which was surprisingly popular amongst bible believers and led to an explosion of homeschooling. Leading to the ridiculous situation of dumb ignorant parents bringing up their kids to be as stupid as them.
@@Jewonastick Lol. I recall you once told me AIG deliberately lied about evolutionary theory. That was not true then, and here you are saying no geologist believes the information in this presentation, which is also not true. Are you deliberately telling lies, or are you purposefully ignorant of these geologists ?
Viewpoint makes a huge difference. Without being willing to look from a different direction one can misinterpret all sorts of events...even accidents or intentional events.
The Ark looked like a giant chest rather than a modern ship. It is interesting that every culture throughout the earth has various flood stories which indicates that it was a real even. There is the fossils that show ocean life that is found far inland on all continents. The Chinese character for ship is made up of a combination of characters that reads 8 persons on a boat.
@@HansZarkovPhD With a lot of phantasy you can say it is a ship... by know it is already proven... it is a natural accident and not an old ship... not even Noah's ark.
Yes there have been many floods. Asteroids hit the earth in the past, in America, in Europe in Asia... and of course... some of the big strikes found it's way in old stories....because they destroyd a lot. But all of them has one thing in common... it has nothing to do with a god.
When I was a Boy Scout in southern Arizona, we went camping up in the local mountain. Elevation was about 5300 feet. I climbed up the side of an exposed hill and saw a 3 inch thick sedimentary layer composed of nothing but hundreds of thousands of tiny snail shells. I had no idea at the time that they were millions of years old, but I wondered how they all died like that. There was also a large rock about 3 feet thick that had a giant snail fossil embedded in it. I went back around 5 years later thinking I could get it out but never could find the exact site. Knowing that I was in the desert, 1 mile above sea level, standing on what used to be an ocean shore, still amazes me today.
How do you know it was an ocean shore that had since dried up, and not an ocean floor that had since been pushed up by tectonic movement? How do you think mountains are formed anyway... oh wait, just like everything else you think a magic man who lives somewhere in the sky did it, right? Sure, because we've seen that in reality before😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@010101110101010001000110 Thank you so much for your concern, but honestly, nothing tragic has happened in my life. I just have a better grip on reality than it seems some of you folks do. It clearly doesn't make sense that all the all these different rock layers were layed down in one year during a worldwide flood. Just like in reality, one flood event would sort the sediment by weight. You would not expect to see heavier sediment on top of lighter sediment. That's just how reality works, when you don't try to insert your beliefs into the equation, without sufficient evidence to support those beliefs. Best of luck to on that whole living forever after you die thing though, because we know that happens in reality all the time.🤣
It seems remarkable that you would waste your time on something you believe is untrue. I believe that the Holy of God is calling you. Why else spend time here. Praying for you, that your eyes will open.
@Jerald McGowin I have to assume you're talking to me. To answer your question though, I "spend the time" because one person may read my comment, and realize that, "Superiority" does NOT mean "Worthy". EVERY dictatorship in the world has been founded on b the same principles as religion. If you are subjugated by someone more powerful, you should submit to their will and worship them as the superior beings they believe themselves to be. I WON'T believe that someone like that is capable of making "Moral Judgment", so why would I believe the fairytale their philosophy is based on? Please, do pray for me though. With ANY luck, you'll realize that NO ONE is listening.... Eventually.🤔
I've seen footage of fossilized remains of creatures among other creatures together in the same fossil bed. Creatures that would never in life gather together, but yet are found mixed in together as fossils. Some of these beds are found at high levels where it was clear that the creatures were trying to avoid the rising waters.
@Dw Smyyth I simply mentioned a piece I saw in the past. I never said that I did the investigating and, based on that, made my conclusions. In any event, I believe it was part of a film from 1976 called "In Search of Noah's Ark." So there's my source if I remember correctly.
@@joerocker3029 Dude, did you even watch the video? Which part is trash and why? It is obvious you don't like the idea, but make a good argument or complaint
@@H4KnSL4K oh, i could, i debate all the time, but i dont have time to teach biology, geology, physics and other stuff over a fkn youtube chat channel. Fact is, everything this dipshit said in the video was a misrepresentation of the facts. Lets start with something easy. When he was talking about sedimentation he said "it was all laid down by water." False, MANY geological layers are wind blown desert sands that solitify into strata layers. Address that and we can move forward. Ignore that and we end the conversation here.
@@joerocker3029 But if I may my good man why would lying be wrong in the atheist view we came from nothing and from the Big Bang that also came from nothing there no natural laws or moral laws or to more easier no such thing as right or wrong you may say I get to decide or these groups of people get to decide but this fails cause you can say it’s wrong to lie while the other says it’s good to lie and murder. Evolution is so inviting because of this there’s no such thing as sin and death is the hero of evolution. But if there is a just God who has said what’s right and wrong you won’t like that because the thing is humans love is sin. You would maybe like to watch pornography or steal something (note not implying that you do those things). Well God says that wrong. Anyway God bless and Jesus loves you ❤.
@@KalonOrdona2 The argument presented here was that the event was so sudden and total that animals did not finish a meal nor were fully delivered of birth. I do not see why humans would escape the same fate.
Respectfully, I'm curious why, on Bible videos that show evidence for God's word (like this one), we often find those who comment that they don't need any proof, yet they still watch the videos, and then comment in the comment-section "I don't need any proof, like the rest of you". Sincerely, it does come off as sounding arrogant (even if unintentional), as though other Christians are somehow less because they enjoy watching apologetics videos. I'm also curious of your perspective. had you been in first century Israel after Jesus died, and you heard that Jesus was going about showing people "many infallible proofs that He was alive", would you have told other Christians who were flocking to see Jesus that, nope, you didn't need to see the resurrected Jesus, because you don't need any proof. "After His suffering, He presented Himself to them with many convincing proofs that He was alive." ACTS 1:3 - signed "A believer who has been often embarrassed by, and is still struggling with, his own arrogance and pride".
If one part of God's Word is untrue, then any part can be doubted and is not inspired by God. I believe since you (we) have finite knowledge, there are many things a person can misinterpret. God's Word is truth! What we need to know about ourselves from God's Word and our only hope of being justified before God: [WHY WE HAVE NO HOPE IN OURSELVES: Mk. 7:20-23 And he (Jesus) said, That which comes out of the man, that defiles the man. For from within, out of the heart of men, proceed evil thoughts, adulteries, fornications, murders, thefts, covetousness, wickedness, deceit, lasciviousness, an evil eye, blasphemy, pride, foolishness: All these evil things (sins) come from within, and defile the man.] [WHY WE NEED A SAVIOR: Rom. 3:10-28 As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one: There is none that understands, there is none that seeks after God. They are all gone out of the way, they are together become unprofitable; there is none that does good, no, not one. Their throat is an open sepulchre; with their tongues they have used deceit; the poison of asps is under their lips: Whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness: Their feet are swift to shed blood: Destruction and misery are in their ways: And the way of peace have they not known: There is no fear of God before their eyes. Now we know that what things so ever the law says, it says to them who are under the law: that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God. Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his (God's) sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin. But now the righteousness of God without the law is manifested, being witnessed by the law and the prophets; Even the righteousness of God which is by faith of Jesus Christ to all and upon all them that believe: for there is no difference: For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God; Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus: Whom God has set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God; To declare, I say, at this time his righteousness: that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believes in Jesus. Where is boasting then? It is excluded. By what law? Of works? Nay: but by the law of faith. Therefore we conclude that man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law. Joh. 3:16 For God so loved the world (us), that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believes in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. Joh. 14:6 Jesus said to him (us), I am the way (salvation), the truth (assurance), and the life (eternal): no man comes to (God) the Father, but by me (God the Son). Rom. 5:1 Therefore being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ:]
@Kent Paulhamus you sure like to cherry pick from the Bible, I wonder, do you BELIEVE it is ALL the true word of god or do you only believe in the parts that you like?
@@tiredofliars I do not cherry pick from God's Word. 2 Tim. 3:16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: I can only give God's Word and pray that God through the Holy Spirit will work in the hearts of those who read his Word and come to believe with a repentant heart and put their faith in Jesus Christ as their Lord and savior. God's Word will either offend you or bring you to repentance of your sinfulness. Rom. 6:23 For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord. Rom. 3:23 For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;
@@kentpaulhamus2158 So you BELIEVE that everything in the Bible is the TRUE word of god? So, you are fine with abortion? You do know that god sanctioned abortion, and not only sanctioned it, but set the price for it 2400 years ago. Not only that, there are no term limits on WHEN that abortion can be performed, it could be the day before the expected birth, and if the father wants to pay the price, then the priest will force the woman to drink the filth, urine, feces, blood, and all the runoff from slaughtering animals, and if she vomits so hard as to miscarry, then she is to be taken out and stoned as an adulteress, and if she DOES NOT vomit so hard to dislodge the child, it MAGICALLY becomes the offspring of the husband, even if he had been away for a year and his wife is six months pregnant. And you are fine with rape as long as the rapist PAYS the father of the victim 30 shekels of silver and marries his victim, that way he can rape her from then on? That is OK with you morally? How about all the added books to the Bible? In Deuteronomy, BOOK 5, written in 478 BC, it says do not add or remove from these books, yet, 900 years later the Catholic Church invented the New Testament, You are FINE with ADDING anywhere from 61 to 74 additional books to the bible, depending on which VERSION of the over 400 versions that have been invented in the last 500 years you BELIEVE is the TRUE one?. Of course, if you are not using one of the ORIGINALS then are you using one of the NEW versions of God's Unchanging Word? Here is a challenge for you, ask that Holy Spirit you claim to be in communication with to give you the exact words that will convert me to YOUR CULT of Chrsitinsanity, if your god (Who is all powerful, all knowing, all caring, etc.) cannot give you those words, then I have to assume that your particular CULT is one of the 41000 false ones out there that have been invented over the last 500 years. Your bible claims that you will be able to convert me. It claims that your god will give you the words. So, if you cannot come up with those words, you are a false liar and you are worshiping a false god OR your god simply does not exist and you are deluded and anywhere from mildly to extremely psychotic.
@@kentpaulhamus2158 By the way, CHERRY PICKING is the process of PICKING a single statement from a work of fiction and trying to say it has meaning outside of the chapter, verse and BOOK it is CHOSEN from to be put with OTHER singular statements from OTHER books. THAT IS WHAT YOU DO!!!! LOL! You are a habitual cherry picker! Here is the entirety of 2 Timothy 3 for you, But mark this: There will be terrible times in the last days. 2 People will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, proud, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, 3 without love, unforgiving, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not lovers of the good, 4 treacherous, rash, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God- 5 having a form of godliness but denying its power. Have nothing to do with such people. 6 They are the kind who worm their way into homes and gain control over gullible women, who are loaded down with sins and are swayed by all kinds of evil desires, 7 always learning but never able to come to a knowledge of the truth. 8 Just as Jannes and Jambres opposed Moses, so also these teachers oppose the truth. They are men of depraved minds, who, as far as the faith is concerned, are rejected. 9 But they will not get very far because, as in the case of those men, their folly will be clear to everyone. A Final Charge to Timothy 10 You, however, know all about my teaching, my way of life, my purpose, faith, patience, love, endurance, 11 persecutions, sufferings-what kinds of things happened to me in Antioch, Iconium and Lystra, the persecutions I endured. Yet the Lord rescued me from all of them. 12 In fact, everyone who wants to live a godly life in Christ Jesus will be persecuted, 13 while evildoers and impostors will go from bad to worse, deceiving and being deceived. 14 But as for you, continue in what you have learned and have become convinced of, because you know those from whom you learned it, 15 and how from infancy you have known the Holy Scriptures, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus. 16 All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, 17 so that the servant of God[a] may be thoroughly equipped for every good work. SO, SELF PROCLAIMED "servant of god", do you feel fully equipped to deal with me, a simple man who actually has read the entire bible (well one version of it, with a lot of snippets from some of the hundreds of others) and knows not only what books were added when, but WHY they were added, or REMOVED or altered to suit the current ruler. Do you EMBRACE the HOLY WORD OF GOD (which is only the first five books by the way) as true? Then why do you not READ ALL OF IT? Also, who are these people Jannes and Jambres, they do not appear anywhere else in the Holy Word of God, the Bible or anywhere but this chapter! Let me guess, they were mentioned in one of the books of the bible that were removed by one pope or another during the 1100 years the Catholic Church took to create the current version of THEIR bible. Do you find it strange that the religion that invented the book, continued to add to it after a CULT broke away with only part of the complete works of the holy word of god?
@@Mackerelly But yet, not a single dinosaur fossil mixed in the same strata as humans or our recent evolutionary ancestors. It gives the appearance that you’re referring to something known as mythology or folklore.
@@dross4207 Dinosaurs did not have hands and feet to climb to higher ground as humans do. In most cases, man was smarter than to live around carnivores. Soft dinosaur tissue (decalcified) has now been found on five continents attesting to the fact dinosaurs were much more contemporary and did in fact live at the time of man. Peruvian Ica Burial Stones and Acambara Mexico figurines found by the tens of thousands prove that man had interactions with dinosaurs as early as 3500 years ago. By the way Dinosaur and human footprints have been found together in a Glen Rose Texas. Get up to speed and think a little.
@@rachelnaisbett9712No one ever said that mammals couldn’t or didn’t coexist with dinosaurs. Humans didn’t. And no mammals, or any land creature at all, are found in lower layers of strata. How is that possible if a worldwide flood wiped out all of the animals from mice, to rats, to dogs, to cows, to elephants, to dinosaurs, to humans? Why did not a single land animal get fossilized in those lower strata when they would be among the first to succumb to a flood? Name one source that says that mammals or birds couldn’t or didn’t exist alongside dinosaurs.
@thedubwhisperer2157 You're right, like believe in the "big bang" or evolution of everything from a microscopic cell that just magical appeared. Now that would take unlimited blind faith.
@@edbrackeen5979 Have YOU read the entire Bible? Beginning to end without stopping, without trying to twist the "WORD OF GOD" into what you WANT it to say? If you BELIEVE that the BIBLE is truly the word of god, then why are you on the Internet? Your bible instructs you to do certain things that you are certainly not doing. Do you know WHY you do not live your life according to the rules in the bible, because if you tried you would end up in prison in 90% of the countries of the world.
@Bass Acoustic Electric Classical Guitar Lessons You actually should refrain from lazy childish regurgitations of bs some MarXist fed you and actual learn the truth by personal due diligence...!
@Guitar Lessons Jesus fulfilled the law and became our law. We are not under Old Testmant law any more. The OT is for our learning but Jesus is our “law” now.
I really like these videos. They are fast, concise, and not boring as some other Creation shows. The speaker is engaging and intelligent, and well spoken, except when in inexplicably says burr'ee'ul instead of burial.
@@bite-sizedshorts9635 As I said . . . .convincing to ignorant cowards! You really think that you, or the clown in this circus show, know more than the millions of geologists that laugh at your so ignorant beliefs???? Think about this: If the young age of the Earth is true, why is it so damn obvious that the mountains in the Eastern USA are so much older than the mountains in the Western USA?
@@customsongmaker Depends how high are the mountains. According to the Bible the flood was only 15 cubits / 23 ft / 7m deep. How did that cover all the mountains on Earth? Well, obviously, there were no higher mountains at that time, the mountains only rose AFTER the flood. Simple! But in case that sounds ridiculous (!) there is another interpretation that this depth was the draught of the Ark, not the depth of the flood. So if the flood was deep enough to cover the highest mountains the amount of extra water required would need to be more than half the total ocean water in the world today. And all of that water went ……….. ??
@@gweilospur5877 15 cubits deep from where? The tops of the mountains? As for where the water went, it currently covers ~70% of the Earth's surface. There's also plenty underground, and recent news says there's more water bound near the Earth's core than in the oceans.
@@customsongmaker I’m talking about the ridiculously huge amount of EXTRA water that would have been needed to cover as high as Everest (and 15 cubits higher). To say nothing of the fact that nobody in the Middle East in those days would even have any idea how high Everest was, or that Everest was the highest mountain. Where did that water come from, and then where did it go? How would anybody 4500 years ago know that the entire world was experiencing a flood? Did they turn on the TV and see it on CNN? Did they phone people in other countries using their mobiles? Did the Ark circumnavigate the globe to see that it was all flooded? The entire story is ridiculous in so many ways that it isn’t even worthy of consideration.
@@gweilospur5877 There are helpful scientific details in the story. #1, there was no rain at a certain point in history before the Flood. #2, there were no rainbows. #3, human lifespan drastically decreased afterwards. Since the primary cause of aging is cellular damage from the sun's free radical radiation, an enormous and constant layer of clouds would filter the sun's radiation, and prevent rainbows, and provide a source for enough water to flood the globe.
Also a touch of [super] volcanic activity, meteoric impacts, polar shifting, and glacial drift/ till. Large-scale flooding and mass extinction events aren't even refuted by current secular models. Where the Biblical theory deviates is by assuming a single event produced all the worldwide evidence of calamity... with only 8 human survivors and their farm animals on a 500 ft wherry that somehow produced the vast diversity of modern terrestrial fauna without the aid of evolution.
I believe in the Word of God. I believe Jesus Christ is who the Bible says He is. I believe Jesus is going to do what the Bible says He will do. Also I believe I'm who and what the Lord says I am. Waiting on you Lord to bring me home.
I believe in the Word of God, I believe Jesus Christ is who the Bible says he is. I believe Jesus is going to do what the Bible says he will do. I believe I'm who and what the Lord says I am. But, I just still can't believe that Donald Trump was ever the President.
An average atmospheric river can carry roughly the same amount of water as the average flow at the mouth of the Mississippi River, but exceptionally strong ones can transport up to 15 times that amount, meaning they can carry a massive volume of water vapor, equivalent to several times the flow of the Mississippi River
The truth is the truth no matter what man says and God cannot lie that’s enough for me to believe God’s truth. Thank you for your faith and video’s Brother. God bless you.
I also believe in God's truth....i just realize that man often puts his own spin on God's word. The biblical story of the flood is taken from even more ancient flood myths. Recognizing that much of the Bible is fables created to make a point does NOT lessen the overall impact of the Bible! If you really want the truth...compare the first chapters of the Book of Genesis with the theory of the creation of the universe. Each step of Genesis matches what we know...the only difference is the timeline.
@@vchism712 You did not answered the question! What makes you so sure...? There is no proof and even the Genesis is just something on paper which is not available as the original document. Even it would be available.... where is the proof? Why you so sure about god? Other religion have also a good, so which one is the real one? If there is more than one???
That's it! The best evidence thus far! The trees fossilized standing up; right where they grew. The sedimentary "layers" cannot thus be attributed to millions of years of deposition. THANK YOU❤
@@thedubwhisperer2157most humans probably got to high ground the first few days the flood was happening since they had knowledge of most of the terrain near them which the other animals didn’t have knowledge of. Also creatures like most mammals, most reptiles, and birds just don’t fossilize well since they aren’t massive or aquatic
No it's not. Polystrate objects like trees are buried, fossilised so now they are mineralised and distinct from their strata. The strata erodes and slow burial covers them with new layers.
None of us were there lol. But if Jesus believed the story (being God Himself), then who am I to doubt it? He also said that when He returns, the condition of the world will be similar to what it was in the days of Noah - they shut the knowledge of God out of their lives. He predicted it, and we're seeing the fulfillment of His words.
The Tetragrammaton, ancient 4 letters for the unique N. of God. The causative form of the verb To be. He can cause Himself to overcome any (for us) obstacle. The animals might have been made compliant, not by Noah. The Ark was only required to float. Naval ratio of 6:1. Possibly size of the British Museum. A Christian keeps JC commandments. He said when praying (all of John Chapter 17) to the Creator, verse 17 "Your word is truth". Otherwise calling our Ransomer a liar. Christendom, the Bible's false friend. Embraced wholeheartedly evolution, unscriptural dogma. World Wars 1 & 2 began by the divided denominations of so-called Christianity. 🕊
@@oscarsotelo8548Only because (perhaps) the only images etched in your mind are the silly, childish pictures of small houseboats with giraffe's necks and elephant's trunks sticking out of silly little windows... Those pathetic posters may have been painted and erected by sincere folks, but they lacked truth and understanding.... They were not worthy of the wall space they occupied.
Now go read the epic of Gilgamesh, the story of unapishtum and the story of atra hasis.. those are the actual myths Noah was copied from in fact the Bible version actually used summerian loan words proving that noah was just a copy of a much older story... Genesis itself was just copied from the Sumerian enuma elish. Do some research
I found them. These are the kids left behind. Y'all really never learned about plate tectonics? It debunks all of this. "How are there fossils in the Himalayas?" Easy. India was an island and collided, over millions of years, with Asia slowly pushing mountains up. It's a process we can accurately measure today.
Just tell me one thing, why if God is so loving and kind did he consider it acceptable to kill every living creature on the surface of the earth apart from a chosen few. A far greater genocide than anyone else has ever committed in the history of the Earth.
@@philiprobinson2011 the scriptures tell us why, "The LORD saw that the wickedness of man was great upon the earth, and that every inclination of the thoughts of his heart was altogether evil all the time" Genesis 6:5.
I thought God created man in his own image. So he either did a very bad job, or he has a very bad temper and preferred to kill rather than change things peacefully. I suppose it might explain why he also created the Devil, disease and suffering. Perhaps he is not the loving God after all? @@Sundayschoolnetwork
I'm particularly impressed at the comments here from people who, despite apparently having no education or understanding of geology or paleontology, and having never read any books or papers on the topic, are convinced their observation of a fossil above present day sea level is enough to wholly overturn the work of the thousands of scientists who've spent a lifetime studying it. Mazel tov!
Get ready for winter, says God or the Ram, as he leaves the upper hemisphere, Eden, Paradise or summer, and he will be obeyed, or the neglect will be punished accordingly. "And the rain was upon the earth forty days and forty nights" (Gen. 7:12). Now it happens, and curiously enough too, that the very next month after the Lord had shut Noah and his companions in the ark, was called Bul, in Hebrew; in English Rain, because of the heavy rains it brings. The word mabul, here translated "flood" is by grammatical construction, a participle of but, to rain, and should have been translated raining, as having reference to the rainy season, rather than flood, which simply means the flowing of water in a swollen stream, or river. Here, then, we have another of the many proofs that this legend did not originate in Egypt, which is comparatively a rainless country, but in some district where they have but two seasons, the wet and the dry, as in Hindustan, or India; and this is now coming into general belief. … "The entrance into the ark was considered as a descent into Tartarus (Hell); the liberation from it was deemed a passage into Elysium (Heaven)." (Faber, Pag. Idol., vol. 1, p. 374.) … Typhon (Hill-Sun = Lord) constructed an ark of curious workmanship. Into this Osiris (the Sun) entered, and was shut up by Typhon. This was the same Deity that shut Noah and his family into the ark." (Jacob Bryant, vol. 3, p. 168.) "The ark was spoken of by the mythologists as the mother of mankind." (Ibid.) So was the earth spoken of as the mother of mankind, and truly too. "On the return of Osiris to Egypt, Typhon laid a stratagem for him, and contrived, in the midst of a feast (the ingathering), to shut him up in a chest which exactly fitted his body. This took place on the 17th day of the month ahthyr, when the Sun was in Scorpio." (Prichard's Egypt. Myth., p. 58.) Osiris, after escaping, returns to Egypt (winter) every year in autumn. Though it rained but "forty days and forty nights," " the waters prevailed, and did not abate from off the earth until after the end of one hundred and fifty days," = the rainy season in either hemisphere, and corresponding in the northern, to the months October, November, December, January and February, while the Sun is below the equator.
@@ShruteFarms001 thanks for that. Perhaps the defining feature of religious fundamentalism is dogmatism. The world is black and white. There's Hell on one hand, Heaven on the other. The saved and the damned. There are god-given eternal truths that they can be known with 100% certainty. When fundamentalists look at science with this mindset, they imagine that finding even a single flaw in a scientific hypothesis means science itself is fatally flawed. After all, isnt that how their theology works? But science has a completely different paradigm. It deals in probabilities and relative confidence, not absolute certainties. Finding a flaw in a scientific hypothesis doesn't undermine science itself. On the contrary, science advances mainly through a process of deliberately trying to find the flaws in a hypothesis so it can be thrown out or amended to fit reality more closely. That's how we got from shouting to being able to communicate across thousand of miles using satellites and computers. Meanwhile, fundamentalist thinkers are still stuck with ideas about sheep and goats thought up by pastoralists in the patriarchal ancient Near East
On May 18, 1980, when I was just sixteen years old and was driving to work, I thought that Seattle had been "nuked". I watched the sky darken, as an enormous black cloud stretched from the southernmost point of the visible horizon to the northernmost point, pushing eastward, enveloping the entire landscape in just hours. I was living in Kalispell, MT, and Mount St. Helens had just erupted, sending its black clouds up into the atmosphere. Months later, after all was said and done, scientists who went to Washington state to examine the aftermath of the cataclysmic event looked at newly-formed draws and what New Mexicans call "arroyos", where the water had quickly receded from the millions of tons of melted snow and ice that were expelled from the mountain at the time of the eruption. What they saw were almost EXACT replicas of the Grand Canyon and other, similar examples of rapidly retreating waters, where layer upon layer of various sediments and debris were stratified in very short order(NOT over millions of years, but in just weeks or months). There were the same examples of trees and other captured objects that traversed multiple layers of strata, just as we see in the Grand Canyon and at other sites around the world. The evidence showed that, contrary to popular belief, the rocky ground of the Grand Canyon WASN'T "carved" by the little "creek" that is the Colorado River. It is simply following the contours of the deep canyon that was created in the cataclysmic aftermath of the global flood spoken about in the Bible, and what has been taught for centuries in MANY spoken traditions of peoples all around the globe. And while we're at it, the Colorado would have had to flow UPHILL in a couple of instances for many of those "millions of years", in order for the theory of a "millions of years old Earth" to be correct. Notice that the far more impressive Mississippi River rests on dirt & sand, and has supposedly been flowing for just as great a period of time, but has exactly HOW deep of a canyon? Right. No "canyon" exists in that case. How curious. And, when was a kid, and lived in Hideaway Park, CO (in the 1970's), I occasionally found small shells which appeared to have been from an aquatic origin. That was at over 8500 feet above sea level. I have no reason to doubt the Biblical account of the Global Flood, or of our intelligent design. Anyone who is familiar with microbiology should also see the beauty of how each living thing has been made. We, and everything else we see on Earth are nothing short of amazing and miraculous.
I agree for the most part, but Noahs flood was not the only one. There was a world age before this present one, which ended with a massive flood event which lasted much longer than 150 days, and left the earth without form and void.
Lets entertain that this flood existed. Doesn't make it biblical, people make it biblical and start expanding on the stories that were made up like the ark. The Chinese whisper effect takes place. How did they know it was a world wide flood? What was their communication system with the other side of the world back then?
It is similar to this reported finding of the Ark. Lets assume they did find some wood up there. Many people here are like "That is it! The ark was found and therefore the bible is true!" Slow your roll people. STEP 1> Prove whatever was found was an actual ark from the times we would expect. I dont want to hear "it must be an ark..." or some other assumption bs. I dont want to hear any of those crazy things. Dig that crap up and prove it is and ark by allowiing the scientific community as a whole access to the artifacts for an unbiased review. Only when this step is done can you go to step two. STEP 2> Prove that this was Noahs Arc and was capable of the claims made by the bible. This one will be difficult to do but we cannot simply say "if it is an ark- it must be Noah's." Based on what?Once this step is done you can go to step 3 "STEP 3> Prove that there was a global flood. No matter how many misguided people hit this thread with comments about evidence of a flood- THERE IS NONE.... ZIP ....ZILCH. There is not one piece of evidence that is accepted by the science community as a whole that even obscurely points to a globel flood event. . All you have is the rambling of con artists like Wyatt. So even though some of you think the search is over and the ark was found, that is not the case. You have a loooooooooong way to go to be able to make that claim. Happy hunting! @@ThePlim62
The earth's crust is not static. It moves. Very slowly, but it moves (sometimes it moves quickly which we know as an earthquake). What was once the bottom of an ocean becomes the top of a mountain. That is how early life, which lived in the oceans, ended up on the tops of mountains. One of the most famous such places is the Burgess Shale in British Columbia, Canada. As far as floods go, most of the people on earth live close to water. That is more or less a necessity given about 60% of a humans body weight is water (a remnant of our evolutionary past), and we leak water at a fairly rapid rate. One of the things we know about rivers is that they flood on a regular basis. Stories of floods then, are pretty common around the world. Was there a worldwide flood? Look at the world today. Roughly 70% of the earth's surface is covered with water, so one could say we live in a time that has a 70% world-wide flood.
This is a prime example of the type of close mindedness that plagues academic science, which is obviously where your *thesis was derived. It's entirely possible that there was a flood which reached the tops of mountains, yet you and the academics you get your *facts from refuse to allow that possibility to enter your minds. Keep talking, and keep showing the world just how screwed up and prejudice academia is. Please, go on.
Hey listen, I’m not saying this in a mean way but evolution (man evolving from apes) is pure fantasy. Give me just one observable evidence for evolution that doesn’t require faith? Every living thing produces after their kind, humans produce humans and dogs produce dogs, etc. There are different variations within a kind (which is biblical) but living things remain within their own and natural selection is science just not the theory that we evolved from apes, etc. If you agree that dogs share a common ancestor that is a dog, then we have no problem. The problem starts when people start using their imagination (sponge bob style) and call that science. There are different definitions of evolution but again, the theory that we evolved from animals and animals changed into something they are not is pure fantasy. What we actually observe today is all there has ever been, living things remain within their own. The theory of evolution and the big bang is anti-science because it's not observable or testable. There are so many problems with those theories. Like, where did all the complex elements that supposedly made us come from? Evolutionary scholars believe that the creation of life involved waters but here's the big problem with that. Sunlight and water destroy DNA, the very thing that destroys DNA somehow assembled it? So how did the DNA code originate? What came first-DNA or the repair enzymes that are necessary to maintain DNA? You need both at the same time, the information for the repair enzymes is encoded into the DNA itself. This all has to be true simultaneously or living things don’t exist. Just so many problems these theories can't answer because it's nothing more than political propaganda and yet we wonder why our society is the way it is. Who determines what good and evil are? 👉Society does not determine morality.👈 I'm only saying these things because your life matter to God, he created you with a purpose. He has been misrepresented by people who don't know him, Christianity is not church attendance and religion is dead but having a personal relationship with God is everything.
This One Trick will fool Creationists Ask them, "When the Ark landed and the people came out onto dry land, what did booth the people and the animals eat?" Importantly, what did the carnivores eat? We can see that the salted ground won't be growing anything any time soon after the people landed. This one trick can show that the story is just a myth - copied from the Babylonians and earlier peoples.
Get ready for winter, says God or the Ram, as he leaves the upper hemisphere, Eden, Paradise or summer, and he will be obeyed, or the neglect will be punished accordingly. "And the rain was upon the earth forty days and forty nights" (Gen. 7:12). Now it happens, and curiously enough too, that the very next month after the Lord had shut Noah and his companions in the ark, was called Bul, in Hebrew; in English Rain, because of the heavy rains it brings. The word mabul, here translated "flood" is by grammatical construction, a participle of but, to rain, and should have been translated raining, as having reference to the rainy season, rather than flood, which simply means the flowing of water in a swollen stream, or river. Here, then, we have another of the many proofs that this legend did not originate in Egypt, which is comparatively a rainless country, but in some district where they have but two seasons, the wet and the dry, as in Hindustan, or India; and this is now coming into general belief. … "The entrance into the ark was considered as a descent into Tartarus (Hell); the liberation from it was deemed a passage into Elysium (Heaven)." (Faber, Pag. Idol., vol. 1, p. 374.) … Typhon (Hill-Sun = Lord) constructed an ark of curious workmanship. Into this Osiris (the Sun) entered, and was shut up by Typhon. This was the same Deity that shut Noah and his family into the ark." (Jacob Bryant, vol. 3, p. 168.) "The ark was spoken of by the mythologists as the mother of mankind." (Ibid.) So was the earth spoken of as the mother of mankind, and truly too. "On the return of Osiris to Egypt, Typhon laid a stratagem for him, and contrived, in the midst of a feast (the ingathering), to shut him up in a chest which exactly fitted his body. This took place on the 17th day of the month ahthyr, when the Sun was in Scorpio." (Prichard's Egypt. Myth., p. 58.) Osiris, after escaping, returns to Egypt (winter) every year in autumn. Though it rained but "forty days and forty nights," " the waters prevailed, and did not abate from off the earth until after the end of one hundred and fifty days," = the rainy season in either hemisphere, and corresponding in the northern, to the months October, November, December, January and February, while the Sun is below the equator.
But he said to him, If they do not hear Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded though one rise from the dead. [LUKE 16:31] If you do not believe what is written in the Bible, neither will you be persuaded by anything.
This also makes me think of the seas rushing over the land during a possible pole reversal , the diehold foundation talks about the cyclical events connected to our sun which could cause another noahs flood
@@thomasmaughan4798 have a look at the Diehold Foundation, it's interesting to see what has been put together there from studying the earth. It suggests that the spin can and does reverse with catastrophic results.
On day 2 of creation God created a firmament over the Earth. He put the sun, moon and stars within it. The Bible tells us over and over again that the Earth does not move. Man says the Earth spins at 1000 mph while it supposedly orbits the sun at 66,600 mph all while our "galaxy" hurtles through "space" at 515,00 mph yet we cannot feel it. All this movement yet Polaris stays fixed and age after age Orion's Belt still aligns with the Pyramids of Giza. Believe God, not man.
@@scotthenry3401 Well now I know what NOT to look at. So suddenly one day the sun rises in the west instead of the east? Dayum. Well, okay, I'll look at that rabbit hole. Diehold Foundation.
As a child, it always struck me that in order to become fossilized a creature had to be buried completely. Otherwise it would have been scavenged, dragged around, and exposed to the weather, to the point where there is nothing left. It might happen once and a while, but not often enough to account for all the fossilized remains that we've found. As a child I never put this together with the flood. Now I realize it's the only way.
Not always true. Often a creature is fossilised because it has been submerged. Floods happen all the time, everywhere. Right now there is a non flood example of sudden burial in Papua New Guinea. It's a terrible tragedy. And a geological regularity. The Thames in Britain famously has people who are the only ones permitted to scavenge in the mud there, they regularly find old items from ancient times. Up to and including bodies. You would have to pretend that such frequent flooding, mud burials and others were unlikely to have caused fossilisation and somehow only the Noachian flood was the one. Further, we have fossils from dessication. Not sure how they happened in a global flood.
You should mention that 98% of scientists ignore the idea of a flood, mainly because the evidence doesn't support it. But 98% of apologists and biblical literalists have an overwhelming amount of evidence...
I believe exactly what Genesis says. It's so detailed, and organizations like ICR and AIG have also shown the evidence very well. I believe the Old Testament and New Testament.
@@westensanchez9483 God can change the rate of radioactive decay, didn't you know that god is not bound to the laws of physics? LOL!! If these people TRULY believed, they would not need to justify their belief because their god can do anything and leaving evidence is not one of it's strong points.
@@tiredofliars you clearly don't understand carbon dating. I'm guessing your teacher told you how it worked and you believed him without question? You've traded one dogma for another and don't even realize it. Lol
God's great flood was extremely destructive to Earth, it completely changed the planet, broke up all the tectonic plates, forced the giant mountains upward , when God chose to destroy all living things he doesn't play games , but there will always be a remnant , our Amazing God and the amazing Ark allowed the human race to carry on AMEN
@@benscrwbiutb9800 If you think of the universe as a Box it can't just pop into existence on it's own because that would violate the laws of physics which allow the universe to exist in a constant state. But if God created the universe including the laws of physics which do not apply to God and prevent them from just existing because God created them as well as the universe. So in short God can exist out of nothing but the universe can't because the universe is bound by rules while God is not.
@@arc001 Is he? After all is it illegal to give someone their punishment? You have to have an executioner. The punishment for sin is death and all men have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God. So really when God goes around killing people all he is doing is giving them their punishment and even then he gives them a way out if they will accept it. And even then death is a lot more complex in the bible as there is both spiritual and physical death.
If you never been to the Ark replica in Kentucky it is so worth your time. It’s so much bigger than you can imagine. The interior seems bigger than the outside. Very, very cool.
Catastrophic flood? Floods that move sediments are turbulent. Layered sediments are not created by fast moving flood that move massive amounts of material chaotically from one place to another. Another issue of chaotically turbulent flood flows is that dinosaur fossils should be found mixed with marine fossils. This is definitely not the case. BTW, where did all the water go??
Welton know it doesn't have solid evidence. That just tell you to understand what actual evidence is. The ACTUAL solid evidence has already demonstrated that the Noah's Ark myth is exactly that a myth that we know for a FACT did not happen
@@shaunmeyer8822 this video does not debunk anything because it's not real science. Real science has proven that the Noah's Ark fantasy is exactly that… A fantasy that didn't happen. Just as REAL science has established fact that the earth is billions of years old and evolution is a fact. It's not my job to educate you on these things, I get paid when I educate people my get paid very well… So well that you could not afford me. I'm not here to convince someone like you, you're lost. But there are people on the fence that I can't convince the get away from your nonsense and your BS self-hatred religion and I do that every day
@@mattikaronen7728 My “religion” is truth. If it’s not true, I don’t want any part of it. The geology that we have of a number of mega sequences of consecutive water deposited sediment layers over a mile deep with fossils in them around the world on every continent necessitates a global flood catastrophe. I know that hurts the belief of every other made up alternate narrative. It just happens to be a fact that we are all the descendants of those who stepped off of the Ark in the area around Mesopotamia. You can’t argue with known human history or ancient calendars going back only 5,000 years. The ancient civilizations are all descended from Noah who had sixteen grandsons that became the sixteen ancient the civilizations each with their own paternal haplogroup lineage. The Bible is the only text that outlines the following Table of Nations. 1) Tubal Italy K, 2) Javan Greek sea people T, 3) Tiras Thracians L, 4) Magog Asian O, 5) Meshek Siberians N, 6) Madai Medes Q, 7) Gomer Europeans R, 8) Arphaxad Arabs Hebrews I&J, 9) Elam Elamites H, 10) Asshur Assyrians G, 11) Aram Arameans F 12) Lud Lydians F2, 13) Cush Cushites A B & C. 14) Phut early Phoenicians E1, 15) Canaan Canaanites E2, 16) Mitzrayim Egyptians E3, D is likely the Sinite tribe from Canaan. C is the descendants of Nimrod since they can’t possibly be from anyone else. Neanderthals are Japhethites and Denisovans are a mix of Japhethites and Hamites, not Semitic. It shows up on DNA maps and charts. Every grandson of Noah and their descendants have their own paternal Y chromosome haplogroup lineage! I can name all sixteen of them like I just did and give you each of their haplogroups! The evolutionary out of Africa claim is exactly backwards since the *oldest* progenitor is Japheth the ancestor of Eurasians then the Semitic populations of Shem and then the Hamitic African is the youngest progenitor with their eldest sons connecting the three different families descended from the three sons of Noah. It took me a while to understand that the evolutionary claim is assuming that SNP markers are being gained forming the stair steps out of Africa when *the reality is* that the original SNP markers cited are in fact being lost forming the opposite stair steps out of West Asia as known human history shows. The stair step out of Africa claim has to be addressed because the SNP markers are *real* evidence but the evolutionary assumption is exactly backwards. The correct view requires that the older most original genomes of the Japhethites be connected to the Semitics by way of the eldest son of Shem which is Arphaxad (IJ). Arphaxad’s descendants can share the (IJK) SNP marker with the descendants of his uncle Japheth while the descendants of his younger brothers do not share that same (IJK) SNP. You have to root the tree with Japheth the oldest son of Noah and then the oldest son of Shem (IJ Arphaxad) and then Elam and then Asshur and then the youngest brothers Aram and Lud. So you have to begin with the *most original* Y chromosome of Noah’s oldest son Japheth and then the changes occur in the people who were born later. It’s not necessarily a stair step of descendency. It’s changes in the Y chromosome with time. *Arphaxad isn’t descended from Japheth.* He just shares a marker with his uncle that his father used to have when he was born. Shem then lost the marker when Arphaxad’s younger brothers were born. The descendants of Shem are then connected to the descendants of Ham by way of Nimrod the King (C) the the eldest son of Cush who is the eldest son of Ham. So the Hamitic CF (xD&E) paternal haplogroup SNP marker was lost to the *odd ones out* and less original younger brothers and cousins verifying the Table of Nations outlined in Genesis.💥 Learn the Bible before trying to learn anything else. It’s also noteworthy that the D paternal haplogroup lines up with the E2 haplogroup of Canaan which is his son’s tribe of Sinim the Biblical namesake of China. So the only Hamitic haplogroups outside of Africa are the C of Nimrod and the D of the Canaanite tribe of Sinim which is still there in Andaman, Tibetan, Mongolian, Chinese and Japanese areas today.
I've watched this twice, still no evidence. Clearly Calvin is not a scientist and doesn't know how to interpret the evidence. His whole dietribe was "look at this, I think this points to a flood?". That's not how science works. Was any of his 'work' tested or peer reviewed?
I think a vertical tree penetrating through multiple layers of sediment, supposedly separated by millions of years, is a pretty obvious indication that those layers were all layed down simultaneously to allow the tree to be fossilized in place. You simply do not want to see what is in front of your eyes.
As an atheist, now I'm convinced! God exists! A brutal, merciless being who once wiped out almost the entire human race simply because they did not follow his moral ideas. The good thing is, now that we know this thing actually exists, we will find a way to destroy it!
Religions can only be destroyed if childhood indoctrination is outlawed and religious ideas kept from children (a bit like alcohol) until the age of 18. They can then be free to get drunk on the 3000-odd available religions to see if one of them makes any sense whatsoever.
So it's bad for God, the creator, to wipe creation off the earth that was on mass, accepting grape, murder, theft, torture, and things like this as okay? To the point that only 8 people weren't doing and accepting this stuff? That's what you're saying? Do you see the error in your thinking? Much love ❤️✝️
@@GogglesOstrich Of course this is bad. I am the (partly) creater of 3 children. Nothing gives me the right to wipe them off. If a god exists and it has done these things, then it would be mankind's greatest enemy.
@@benbecker2004 False comparison. You didn't make those kids in the womb. You had intercourse with your spouse and the way God made everything to create in the womb takes place. You didn't make the process of a child forming in the womb. God did. So God is still the creator of your kids. Now, let me use a correct analogy. God is the coder. He made a code that has free will, as in it has random outcome. The code gives a randomized outcome the coder didn't like, so the coder has the right to delete some of the code. Your issue is the pride of life. You feel you're entitled to what you have. The reality is that you curse God, your creator, but he's so loving he's blessed you with children and so much. Your enemy is the Devil. He's come to kill, steal, and destroy. You're like a criminal saying that you don't deserve death for murdering and graping 10 people. You don't understand how serious your sin is. You're a criminal on death row and you need a Savior. But you're reacting the Savior currently. Are you willing to accept the Savior? Who you did horrendous crimes against but they died so that justice could be served? Much love ❤️✝️
@benbecker2004 False comparison. You didn't make those kids in the womb. You had intercourse with your spouse and the way God made everything to create in the womb took place. You didn't make the process of a child forming in the womb. God did. So God is still the creator of your kids. Now, let me use a correct analogy. God is the coder. He made a code that has free will, as in it has random outcome. The code gives a randomized outcome the coder didn't like, so the coder has the right to delete some of the code. Your issue is the pride of life. You feel you're entitled to what you have. The reality is that you curse God, your creator, but he's so loving he's blessed you with children and so much.
Funny how they leave out penguins and other animals. Not to mention to make the Noah and young earth claim work, you have to believe in some sort of hyper evolution considering that they only consider "kinds" were loaded into the ark. Plus they still leave the whole predators and prey coexisting on the ark and after without ruining the ecosystem. 😂
"NOTHING will make me believe in Noah's flood!" It depends on how it is described. I have no doubt there was a flood, and a scribe wrote about it, and likely survived it on a boat. It was very likely the Euphrates river which in flood spreads out wide. It need only be about 10 miles wide to be impossible to see shore on either side. A scribe would write "the whole earth" is covered, when plainly it wasn't since a dove came back with an olive branch. The miraculous aspect is that floods of this magnitude is not expected in a desert climate, and Noah was warned to make a boat, which would have seemed absurd to everyone nearby. He would have taken animals common to that area, sheep and goats mostly.
that comment makes no sense because it assumes that the common people 99,9% of humanity to be not wise, also wisdom itself is literally a religious concept (solomon) and all the most wise sages were from religion
Very funny stuff here, you guys rock. This will be my new favourite satire site for religious mockery. The leather vest was a nice touch, it is like the video is being hosted by the Village People. Keep up the good work by exposing the ridiculous ideas for what they are, nonsense.
There never was any global flood. Civilization in China (much of it recorded) continued uninterrupted from 20,000 years ago until today. A Flood would require 3 times as much water as there is above and below the surface of the earth.
@@antzag6983 The Chinese have 15,000 years history with no interruption and no Flood. How is that possible? Did the Flood miss China?. Here is the FACTS of history ----- Now what is your response? *Chinese History and the Global Flood* There is firm historical evidence that refutes the global flood. Young Earth Creationist claim that the world-wide flood occurred somewhere 2300 years after creation (creation being at 6000 years ago). The historical evidence is that no flood occurred in Northern China during the pat 15,000 years. For details, I included the Chinese reference to the available documents as well. Nanzhuangtou (Chinese: 南庄头, Nánzhuāngtóu), dated 9,500-9,000 B.C.E, or 8,700-7,500 B.C.E is an Initial Neolithic site near Lake Baiyangdian in Xushui County, Hebei, China. The site was discovered under a peat bog. Over 47 pieces of pottery were discovered at the site. Nanzhuangtou is also the earliest Neolithic site yet discovered in northern China. There is evidence that the people at Nanzhuangtou had domestic dogs 10,000 years ago. Stone grinding slabs and rollers and bone artifacts were also discovered at the site. It is one of the earliest sites showing evidence of millet cultivation. Pottery can also be dated to 10,200 B.C.E. The Early Neolithic period (7,000 B.C.E-5,000 B.C.E) succeeds Nanzhuangtou, and is characterized by the rise of farming villages across the alluvial .plains of China, as seen in the site of Peiligang. 5,000 B.C.E. - Hemudu culture - "The Hemudu culture [河姆渡文化 Hémǔdù wénhuà] (5500 B.C.E. to 3300 B.C.E was a Neolithic culture that flourished just south of the Hangzhou Bay in Jiangnan in modern Yuyao, Zhejiang, China. In the early Hemudu period is the maternal clan phase. Descent is said to be matrilineal and the social status of children and women is comparatively high. In the later periods, they gradually transitioned into patrilineal clans. During this period, the social status of men rose and descent is passed through the male line." 5,000 B.C.E. - Yangshao culture - "The Yangshao culture [仰韶文化 Yǎngsháo wénhuà] was a Neolithic culture that existed extensively along the Yellow River in China. It is dated from around 5000 B.C.E. to 3000 B.C.E. The culture is named after Yangshao, the first excavated representative village of this culture, which was discovered in 1921 in Henan Province by the Swedish archaeologist Johan Gunnar Andersson (1874-1960). The culture flourished mainly in the provinces of Henan, Shaanxi and Shanxi. The archaeological site of Banpo [半坡 Bàn pō] village, near Xi'an, is one of the best-known ditch-enclosed settlements of the Yangshao culture.” 5,000 B.C.E. - Majiabang culture - "The Majiabang culture [馬家浜文化 Mǎ jiā bāng wénhuà] was a Chinese Neolithic culture that existed at the mouth of the Yangtze River, primarily around Lake Tai near Shanghai and north of Hangzhou Bay. The culture spread throughout southern Jiangsu and northern Zhejiang from around 5000 BC to 3300 BC. The later part of the period is known as the Songze culture.” 3,800 B.C.E. - Majiayao culture - "The Majiayao culture [马家窑文化 Mǎ jiā yáo wénhuà] was a group of Neolithic communities who lived primarily in the upper Yellow River region in eastern Gansu, eastern Qinghai and northern Sichuan, China. The culture existed from 3300 B.C.E. to 2000 B.C.E The Majiayao culture represents the first time that the Upper Yellow River region was widely occupied by agricultural communities and it is famous for its painted pottery, which is regarded as a peak of pottery manufacturing at that time.” 3,100 B.C.E. - Qujialing culture - "The Qujialing culture [屈家嶺文化 Qū jiā lǐng wénhuà] (3400 B.C.E. to 2600 B.C.E.) was a Neolithic civilisation centered primarily around the middle Yangtze River region in Hubei and Hunan, China. The culture succeeded the Daxi culture and reached southern Shaanxi, northern Jiangxi and southwest Henan.” 3,000 B.C.E - Longshan culture - "The Longshan (or Lung-shan) culture [龙山文化 Lóngshān wénhuà], also sometimes referred to as the Black Pottery Culture, was a late Neolithic culture in the middle and lower Yellow River valley areas of northern China, dated from about 3000 B.C.E. to 2000 B.C.E. The culture is named after the modern town of Longshan (lit. 'Dragon Mountain') in the east of the area under the administration of Jinan, Shandong Province, where the first archaeological find (in 1928) and excavation (in 1930 and 1931) of this culture took place at the Chengziya Archaeological Site. Evidence of human sacrifice becomes more common in Shaanxi and the Central Plain in the late Longshan period.” 1,900 B.C. E.- Yueshi culture - "The Yueshi culture [ 岳石文化 Yuè shí wénhuà] of the Shandong region of China, is dated from 1900 B.C.E. to 1500 B.C.E. It spanned the period from the Late Neolithic to the early Bronze Age. In the Shandong area, it followed the Longshan culture period (c. 2600-1900 BC), and was later replaced by the Erligang culture. Yueshi was contemporary with the Erlitou culture and the early Erligang culture, both located to its west. The Tai-Yi Mountains (泰沂山脉) region in central Shandong is the core area of Yueshi, but as the Erligang state (commonly identified with the early Shang dynasty) expanded, Yueshi declined and retreated to the Shandong Peninsula in the east.” 1,900 B.C.E. - Erlitou culture - "The Erlitou culture [二里头文化 Èr lǐtou wénhuà] is an early Bronze Age urban society and archaeological culture that existed in China from approximately 1900 B.C.E. to 1500 BC.E. The culture was named after the site discovered at Erlitou in Yanshi, Henan. The culture was widely spread throughout Henan and Shanxi and later appeared in Shaanxi and Hubei. Chinese archaeologists generally identify the Erlitou culture as the site of the Xia dynasty, but there is no firm evidence, such as writing, to substantiate such a linkage.” 1,500 BCE - Present day - Uninterrupted Chinese history documented in writing. *If the global flood occurred some time about 4000 years ago, it is refuted by Chinese history (much of which is documented and goes back 15,000 years). While there were many smaller and local floods, cultures in China continued to strive and were never wipe out.*
I am a Christian, live in Australia and have a question. We have Koalas here in Australia and they have a very specific diet that being gum leaves (a tree that is native to Australia). 1 - How did the Kolas walk all the way from Mount Tendurek or where the ark ended up. Walking over oceans through harsh conditions which would have been a years long trek for these little guys? 2 - With the understanding that the trees they ate off are only native to Australia. What did they eat along the way?
Here's a question; if the withdrawal of the waters of The Flood, easily created the Grand Canyon, and with minor variations the soil or rock in general is the same or similar wherever you look at it on the planet. How come we don't see a huge number of "Grand Canyon-like"" gorges or river valleys, all over the globe? Why are most of the river valleys on the globe, at ground level or only a small bit, higher or lower?
I am Hmong and my people never knew God until the missionaries came to us. We also have the world wide flood story.
@Lucifer-pn6ni yeah but you don't know my people. We are hill people. We lived in the highlands. Not a valley
@Lucifer-pn6ni yes it does. And evey culture exists to witness that the whole world was flooded. Call witnesses flat earther isn't intelligent at all no?
@Lucifer-pn6ni lucifer, do you live in a box? Your cultural perspective against world wide flood is your own perspective. It isn't the all to end all. To rule out what my culture says there was a world wide flood isn't intelligent at all. It is actually arrogance. My culture isn't even Christianity first of all. Most indigenous cultures who had these story outside of your box didn't even know Christianity existed when they began passing these stories down from generation to generation. Your little box, is so tiny, it can't fit all the other world views that has nothing to do with Christianity, that the world was once flooded. It is actually a minor view of which you are trying to deceive others.
Maybe in your little box world, it didn't flood there. But to the rest of the world, who doesn't know you nor have social media, there was a world wide flood. And that story has been passed down from generations to generations.
@@theotherguy3083 well know every culture that exists is not witnessed the whole world was flooded because that has never happened. We know for a FACT that the entirety of human history, the earth has never been completely flooded. It's a myth.
What we do know, is that many ancient cultures, when they suffered from floods, especially cataclysmic floods, those floods became part of their mythology and that warped all the telephone gain into becoming not just a local cataclysmic event but a worldwide cataclysmic event.
Of course these were ancient people who were ignorant of the world around them and had no idea that while devastating to them what happened to them was only local and not worldwide.
So, since the facts demonstrate there was no worldwide flood all those people in all those different civilizations that thought it was, are simply wrong
His point is that if you live on the mountains, a local flood won’t get you, so how would a “local flood” story go to a mountain-covering one?
Also the flat earth comment was because you compared them to a flat earther. “ the same way flat earth theories form” or something to that effect
God does whatever He wants, whenever He wants, and man just doesn’t understand that. Praise Jesus.
Yes ... like watch rape and do nothing about it. Kill babies and children with cancer. And that is supposed to be a "loving" god?
Thank you Red ghost God Bless
@@esthervarney4011 What makes you think your god loves you?
@@johnl4933 John 3:16 the Bible
@@johnl4933 because I feel it in my heart what abo your god?
It's like that song we used to sing in church.. "God is God, and God don't ever change.. God is God, and always will be God."
Ha ha ha
You have quoted a pure example of brain washing - you twerp.
Chants like that have caused riots, and unintentional deaths.
But the flood story is literally about god changing his mind about humanity. The bible says he regrets making them.
@@mfsebcwbecause they rebelled against him.
If people would now simply repent and turn to God who wants sinners to turn to Jesus whom He sent.
I took a tour of Mt Helens in WA and the tour guide was commenting on how all the experts were shocked at how much material was washed away in such a short amount of time.
Yes … because the sheer force of the eruption moved a lot of material at once. What did you think would happen? Do you think it impressive?
@Fred the 47th and people spent their entire lives studying volcanology likely never saw an explosion and aftermath quite like Mt. St. Helen’s.
So yes, it is still perfectly normal to witness such a monumental event.
I am still superior.
@Fred the 47th oh really? Having studied under an even more renowned volcanologist, I’m laughing at you.
So am I to understand that a volcanologist, who had never seen an eruption like the one at Mt. St. Helen’s before in their lives, weren’t impressed by just how large a scale the eruption was? Why? Because they are volcanologists?
@Fred the 47th incorrect. It’s quite well-known. Now unless you can point out active and extinct volcanoes covering *every square inch of the planet doing the exact same thing,* this is just a phenomenon which is quite well-documented. The resulting landslide and the mini chasms they caused, the “layers”.
But of course, you’re still stuck in 1982 and the “prominent geologist” you claim to have mentored you is more than likely to be grifter Snivelling Snelling.
@Fred the 47th and they are quite distinguishable. Unless of course you tutelage is under the nitwits at ICR
“Even nature itself shows the glory of God.”
Which god would that be?
@@thedubwhisperer2157 If you have to ask, then you already know which God.
Faith makes the visible evidence of the invisible, visible.
Unbelief makes the visible evidence of the invisible, invisible.
Your word salad doesn't change the fact that there's never been a world wide flood.
@@torreyintahoe word salad? that statement takes the literacy level of a fourth grader, tops
@@redschannel6527 So does believing in a flood that never happened.
@@torreyintahoe days since trying to prove an absolute negative: 0
@@redschannel6527 Actually it was disproven in the 1800’s.
Before Noah flood rain never fell from the sky it came from the ground like fog. If you want to know where the water came from look at what a atmospheric river is this will explain some of the questions that are being asked. This doesn't answer the whole question but it gives us a better understanding of alot of these questions.
a lot of water went down inside the earth hence all the large aquifers being discovered
Ahhh yes rain just now existed I never knew
Me must ask ourselves where did the glaciers come from? Maybe Noah's flood waters!
You made that up, didn’t you?
No, it's a question and possibly part of the answer. Have you ever heard of a "atmospheric river " look it up.
When I was young, a group of friends rode our horses to the top of a 9,500 ft mountain in northern Utah. We were surprised to find petrified fish, palm fronds, and other things embedded in the rocks on top. I immediately thought of the flood. A few years later found me digging swimming pools in the hills of Northern California east of Oakland. After digging 12 feet through untouched rock, sand, etc. I found a large piece of green glass finely manufactured. Again, the flood came to my mind. In my view, these things happened with sudden force and powerful movements, not erosion over millions of years. Intellectual pride makes it very difficult for the ‘learned’ to ever accept these observations.
You assume the earth was always the way you view it today. Landscapes change drastically mountains erode and sea floors get pushed up to become mountains
@@kingsknight2112, during the Flood. 😊
@@kingsknight2112 Of course the earth changes, however, I do not agree with a sphere billions of years old. I stand by my stories and opinion. Thank you.
@@bturner540 What good are opinions if they don’t align with truth and reality?
They absolutely do align, just not with today’s prevailing ‘truth,’ which days are numbered.
"Faith is the substanceof things hoped for; the evidence of things unseen"
"...blessed are those who have not seen, yet believe..."
As a Southerner, I have to question what you mean by "blessed"?
Around here "Bless your little heart" isn't a wish for your prosperity, but an insult to your intelligence.
@@atworldsend818 Given context I'd say they mean it as compliment. You are simply nitpicking at the most unnecessary things.
@@maxbennett5412
Not at all. I find that believing things that are evidently true, and pointing out things that are NOT evidently true is very important.
@@atworldsend818 Exactly. Did you know Lucy, supposedly some of the greatest evidence for human evolution, had their bones found in a 50 mile radius? Really sounds more like they just took a bunch of bones and stuck them together. And if you are looking for solid evidence did you even watch the video?
@@atworldsend818 If you're from the South and don't know the difference between "Have a blessed day" and "Bless your little heart", then I'd say that makes you a pretty special person😀
" If they believe not Moses and the prophets neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead "
And one did by the way.
People are so inclined to prove the Bible wrong instead of following the Bible
Knew this many years ago. I have a college friend that became a geologist and now a Christian!
I bet they failed geology!
@@tiredofliars His " College friend " probably works for the mutli trillion dollar oil and gas industry and uses the Bible for discovering reserves for exploration. Sort of like a miracle
@@imafeltersnatch7634 yes because if something disagrees with the theory of everything from nothing, then surely the petroleum industry has catapulted the propaganda into the feeble minds of the public.
You poor souls. The type to believe a book in a school and deny the intelligence of of a obvious creator. The Egyptian's built the pyramids 4k years ago with bronze too.🙄
@@chrisw5150 Please define obvious in this context and please elaborate on what Egypt wrote about your imaginary friends.
"Be ever seeing, but never perceiving"
I think that's great that you expanded into Canada also. God has left so much evidence that he exists and that he is the creator of all things. I knew this even before I was a believer, at 34, because the evidence is there and it would take way too much Faith to believe I evolved out of bacteria in a mud pile that got hit by lightning. God even tells us in Romans chapter 1 and 2 that mankind is without excuse because creation itself can be seen and clearly testifies of God's beauty and His existence.
This is actually an old video, he has been lying for Jesus for a long time at AIG Canada. They just cleaned it up a bit and put in a click bait icon for it.
The only evidence of god is your silly bible. All other evidence shows that there was no flood and there is no god.
This is by far the best video on this topic its straight and to the point! Thank you so much for posting this I shared it with one of my friends!! :)
To God be the Glory!!!
I so agree!!! I originally watched this months ago, well worth watching again. There are some great comments from people here worth reading & learning from too.
@@sydney.g.sloangammagee8181 Well . . . . you are WRONG!!!!!! Just because some babble agrees with your childish beliefs does not make it correct. I suggest you grow up, educate yourself, and cease being so ignorant !
This is the most stupid explanation I’ve ever heard. It’s completely devoid of evidence and fact. And any educated person understands that. Faith makes people stupid.
If you’re convinced of this video, watch “Atheist Answers #43: The Biblical Flood is Supported by Science” by Underlings.
If you’re open-minded, of course.
@L-8 strange that people call the biblical god good, even after he drowned newborn babies
Very interesting. It's causing my view of history to change
Good to hear. Keep looking and believe in God and what he's done for you and I.
@@jamesmorgan2064 Please explain what your god has done? Stand by and watch people being raped? Creating childhood cancer? Wiping out humanity because your god made a mistake?
This did not happen
@@stickyrubb a global flood absolutely did happen. It's easy to dismiss God for you.
For a season
@@jamesmorgan2064 There is no evidence of a simultaneous global flood. There is plenty of evidence for local flooding, just as happens today.
I can honestly say that I have never doubted the account ( it's not a "story " like some fairy tale!) in scripture. As a child I was raised in church, Baptist, so in innocence I believed it. As an adult, I know about the fossil record ,things being found on mountain tops etc. So many forget it wasn't just rain,but the " fountains of the deep " being " broken up ". A LOT and LOTS of water!!! Bless you all!
Not to mention the WINDOWS OF THE FIRMAMENT being opened and all the waters beyond heaven came rushing down also! We KNOW according to the bible, that the firmament is above heaven, and holds back the waters beyond. And the stars are holes through the veil of Heaven allowing the Hosts of heaven to look down on us, right? The Firmament was described as an inverted bowl, and below that bowl is Heaven, and below that the clouds, and below that the mountain tops, where god resided while he wrote the ten commandments, which were destroyed in mere moments, but no matter, we still have the Stele of Hammurabi that was merely MAN MADE from two thousand years before that event that has many of the same commandments, or laws as those that god gave to Moses on fragile tablets that couldn't last a month! LOL! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@tiredofliars Hi!! Yes I was aware of this part of the scripture. I " type " with my fore finger. It is slow and my arthritic hand doesn't like it. GOD bless you!
@@michaeldriskell2038 Doesn't your god give you the power of healing? It states it clearly in the NEW TESTAMENT that those who believe would be able to perform healing, so, I guess you are simply not a TRUE believer, UNDERSTOOD!
"Lots and lots of water"!?!?
Where is it now?
How many human fossils are there in these fossil beds, or where the humans to stupid to go to higher ground with the animals?
I swear, it's like you don't even try to logic.😵💫
@@tiredofliars, what are you talking about?
I lived in a spot in upstate New York where we live about a 150' Above a river. You could walk back Behind our house in the woods and there were these large flat rocks on the ground. There were all sorts of fish fossils in the rocks!
OMG! 150'!!! dude... come on. That is just uneducated nonsense to say that is flood evidence. so sad...
I've lived in two locations where there are shell fossils. The first were displacement fossils where the shells were dissolved away and the cavity infilled with sand and muds - now rock - we broke some and found they were like plaster casts. The other location had shells that were gone and there were just water filled cavities that we could have filled with plaster.
I wish I could see the fossils
@meyokkob458 we attended a small Christian school, so one day we took the entire high school like (20 😂) and the teacher, of course, back into the woods to show them for our science class.. it was pretty neat. I'd love to go back and find them again with today's phone cameras after 30yrs. I could get some pretty awesome pictures. I still remember it and am pretty sure I could easily find them.
@@PBAdventures146 that is so awesome
Dear oh dear. This person is a specialist in nearly all scientific domains. Bravo. And now for reality.
"And now for reality " that dear person you'll only find the Day it's too late .
@@lhood8263well since you’re the medical expert, tell me what diseases they were battling and what mutations did they carry in the dna in Noah’s time??? Probably nothing like what we have to deal with today seeing as most disease is man made… or curable or treatable but if they were closer to creation where there was no death and disease you tell me… also there comes a point in time where God no longer dwells with man and drastically cuts the years of life from who knows down to 120… kinda makes sense when you consider not very many people if any cross that line today and this was written thousands of years before any dr was around… also the Bible says clearly the life is in the blood… pretty scientific for a book that supposedly has nothing to do with science… time space and matter are literally dealt with in the first book of the Bible… you have a hard time believing Noah was 950 and you want me to believe the universe came from nothing and is 4.8 billion years old??? Come on man what’s a stretch???
You are aware that ad hominem attacks don't lend themselves to a reasoned, logical argument, don't you?!
@@lhood8263 If it can still be found...you may want to look up an old Scientific American article regarding how they developed greatly extended lifespans in fruit flies, by preventing them from mating 'til a much greater age. Those that were genetically unfit were eliminated from the gene pool if they didn't make it to the new mating age imposed by the scientists. Those that were genetically fit enough passed on their good genes to the next generation. Now, back to your question - look at the ages at which the anti-deluvian patriarchs were having kids, and not just the ages at which they died. Do you see a connection to that and the fruit fly experiment. In addition, consider that God would've created Adam and Eve genetically perfect, and it would've taken a bit of time for mutations to build up and become deleterious to the point of drastically reducing their lifespans, not to mention that in their pre-industrial times they properly had a lot fewer mutagens around. All these taken together, it's not all that implausible that they lived to considerably longer ages than we do.
@@CGoldmill-dz4gk also the Bible says clearly the life is in the blood… pretty scientific for a book that supposedly has nothing to do with science.
Hardly scientific at all, anyone idiot can see a person bleeding and die and conclude that blood and life are related.
And btw, all the other nonsense you said is just that, nonsense. Provide evidence for any of it if you want to be taken seriously.
Solid case, AiG Canada 👍. Read 'em and weep, local flooders/old earthers [watch and repent]
No case at all.
This was debunked decades ago.
@@frankcardano4142 really? Please link to the debunking
@@H4KnSL4K
Simply read any geology book.
You can find one in any good book store.
Do you know what they look like?
@@frankcardano4142 Evolutionism was debunked over a century ago by Darwin's own contemporaries. Open any geology book and you'll find erosion which evos don't belive in order to hold on to their stories.
@@dokidokibibleclub
Which contemporary?
The only naysayers of his time were Christian geologists who gave up trying to fit the flood narrative with the rock layers that were definitely showing vast periods of time.
By the mid 1800’s, a global flood and a young earth were discounted as mythological.
Only in the 1960’s did a handful of deceitful fundamentalists peddle cherry picked quote mines to distort the science which was surprisingly popular amongst bible believers and led to an explosion of homeschooling.
Leading to the ridiculous situation of dumb ignorant parents bringing up their kids to be as stupid as them.
This is amazing. I never even considered the layers being formed in this manner.
And it’s all been comprehensively debunked decades ago.
And not a single geologist (regardless of their religious background) agrees that the layers were formed this way either...... Guess why?
@@Jewonastick
Can you see me?
@@frankcardano4142 yep
@@Jewonastick Lol. I recall you once told me AIG deliberately lied about evolutionary theory. That was not true then, and here you are saying no geologist believes the information in this presentation, which is also not true. Are you deliberately telling lies, or are you purposefully ignorant of these geologists ?
Excellent video - Thanks again!
Slurp it up
@@joerocker3029 yum?
Viewpoint makes a huge difference. Without being willing to look from a different direction one can misinterpret all sorts of events...even accidents or intentional events.
The Ark looked like a giant chest rather than a modern ship. It is interesting that every culture throughout the earth has various flood stories which indicates that it was a real even. There is the fossils that show ocean life that is found far inland on all continents. The Chinese character for ship is made up of a combination of characters that reads 8 persons on a boat.
That fascinatiates me about the character for boat with 8 people.
So how is the ship shaped object on mt arrarat the ark? You guys can even get that straight.
@@HansZarkovPhD With a lot of phantasy you can say it is a ship... by know it is already proven... it is a natural accident and not an old ship... not even Noah's ark.
Yes there have been many floods. Asteroids hit the earth in the past, in America, in Europe in Asia... and of course... some of the big strikes found it's way in old stories....because they destroyd a lot. But all of them has one thing in common... it has nothing to do with a god.
Actually we studied the characters in Bible study there were more examples. Because people remembered
When I was a Boy Scout in southern Arizona, we went camping up in the local mountain. Elevation was about 5300 feet. I climbed up the side of an exposed hill and saw a 3 inch thick sedimentary layer composed of nothing but hundreds of thousands of tiny snail shells. I had no idea at the time that they were millions of years old, but I wondered how they all died like that. There was also a large rock about 3 feet thick that had a giant snail fossil embedded in it. I went back around 5 years later thinking I could get it out but never could find the exact site. Knowing that I was in the desert, 1 mile above sea level, standing on what used to be an ocean shore, still amazes me today.
How do you know it was an ocean shore that had since dried up, and not an ocean floor that had since been pushed up by tectonic movement?
How do you think mountains are formed anyway... oh wait, just like everything else you think a magic man who lives somewhere in the sky did it, right?
Sure, because we've seen that in reality before😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@atworldsend818 I'm sorry for whatever happened to you in life that caused you to be this way. Wish you better luck in the future. Take care.
@010101110101010001000110
Thank you so much for your concern, but honestly, nothing tragic has happened in my life. I just have a better grip on reality than it seems some of you folks do.
It clearly doesn't make sense that all the all these different rock layers were layed down in one year during a worldwide flood. Just like in reality, one flood event would sort the sediment by weight. You would not expect to see heavier sediment on top of lighter sediment. That's just how reality works, when you don't try to insert your beliefs into the equation, without sufficient evidence to support those beliefs.
Best of luck to on that whole living forever after you die thing though, because we know that happens in reality all the time.🤣
It seems remarkable that you would waste your time on something you believe is untrue. I believe that the Holy of God is calling you. Why else spend time here. Praying for you, that your eyes will open.
@Jerald McGowin
I have to assume you're talking to me. To answer your question though, I "spend the time" because one person may read my comment, and realize that, "Superiority" does NOT mean "Worthy".
EVERY dictatorship in the world has been founded on b the same principles as religion. If you are subjugated by someone more powerful, you should submit to their will and worship them as the superior beings they believe themselves to be.
I WON'T believe that someone like that is capable of making "Moral Judgment", so why would I believe the fairytale their philosophy is based on?
Please, do pray for me though. With ANY luck, you'll realize that NO ONE is listening.... Eventually.🤔
I've seen footage of fossilized remains of creatures among other creatures together in the same fossil bed. Creatures that would never in life gather together, but yet are found mixed in together as fossils. Some of these beds are found at high levels where it was clear that the creatures were trying to avoid the rising waters.
Lol funny how you forgot to support that with evidence somewhere
@Dw Smyyth I simply mentioned a piece I saw in the past. I never said that I did the investigating and, based on that, made my conclusions. In any event, I believe it was part of a film from 1976 called "In Search of Noah's Ark." So there's my source if I remember correctly.
@@zuketroop1
The conclusion that they were all running from the flood is good radio.
Yeah Earthquakes will do that like the Tsunami in Japan or the Boxing day Tsunamis, its happened throughout time.
@lenandov unless you can convince me that they were having a class reunion, I can't find a better conclusion.
Even after the catastrophic flood Earth is beautiful! How great is our God
Perfect, I love it’s, thanks for sharing 😊
It's disgusting to see someone thank someone else for blatantly lying to them and filling their head with complete trash.
@@joerocker3029 Dude, did you even watch the video? Which part is trash and why? It is obvious you don't like the idea, but make a good argument or complaint
@@H4KnSL4K oh, i could, i debate all the time, but i dont have time to teach biology, geology, physics and other stuff over a fkn youtube chat channel. Fact is, everything this dipshit said in the video was a misrepresentation of the facts. Lets start with something easy. When he was talking about sedimentation he said "it was all laid down by water." False, MANY geological layers are wind blown desert sands that solitify into strata layers. Address that and we can move forward. Ignore that and we end the conversation here.
@@joerocker3029 But if I may my good man why would lying be wrong in the atheist view we came from nothing and from the Big Bang that also came from nothing there no natural laws or moral laws or to more easier no such thing as right or wrong you may say I get to decide or these groups of people get to decide but this fails cause you can say it’s wrong to lie while the other says it’s good to lie and murder. Evolution is so inviting because of this there’s no such thing as sin and death is the hero of evolution. But if there is a just God who has said what’s right and wrong you won’t like that because the thing is humans love is sin. You would maybe like to watch pornography or steal something (note not implying that you do those things). Well God says that wrong. Anyway God bless and Jesus loves you ❤.
@@joerocker3029 It's disgusting to see someone come on a video's comments simply to be ugly to others who have a different belief.
ITS TRUE. HERE IN THE PHILIPPINES GIANT CLAMS DIGGED OUT OF THE HILLS FAR FROM SHORE.
Let us know when they dig out human remains. That would tell the story.
The humans would have died on the highest-ground surface or floated on debris, their remains scattered and disintegrated rather than flash-buried
@@KalonOrdona2 The argument presented here was that the event was so sudden and total that animals did not finish a meal nor were fully delivered of birth. I do not see why humans would escape the same fate.
How long does it take for a giant clam to 'crawl' to the top of a hill?
Did the flood last long enough? I doubt it.
Our Sin caused the death of many.
God forgive us.
Thank You Jesus for setting many of us free.
No, it didn't. This was a story, a myth. We didn't cause any death.
I don't need proof, I have always believed in God and his word.
Me too. I have never understood people who have to have proof. God said. I believe him. Simple.
Respectfully, I'm curious why, on Bible videos that show evidence for God's word (like this one), we often find those who comment that they don't need any proof, yet they still watch the videos, and then comment in the comment-section "I don't need any proof, like the rest of you".
Sincerely, it does come off as sounding arrogant (even if unintentional), as though other Christians are somehow less because they enjoy watching apologetics videos.
I'm also curious of your perspective. had you been in first century Israel after Jesus died, and you heard that Jesus was going about showing people "many infallible proofs that He was alive", would you have told other Christians who were flocking to see Jesus that, nope, you didn't need to see the resurrected Jesus, because you don't need any proof.
"After His suffering, He presented Himself to them with many convincing proofs that He was alive." ACTS 1:3
- signed "A believer who has been often embarrassed by, and is still struggling with, his own arrogance and pride".
More evidence of Gods creation for those who have eyes to see.
For those who ignore the scientific method....
@@Jewonastick Stok, "Evolution hasn't been observed while it's happening".
So it fails the scientific method.
@@earlysda first of all evolution IS observed. Second; in science indirect observation also counts as evidence.
@@Jewonastick E Stok, give us some examples of how you think Richard Dawkins' statement can be refuted.
@@earlysda What statement and why do I need to refute anything?
If one part of God's Word is untrue, then any part can be doubted and is not inspired by God. I believe since you (we) have finite knowledge, there are many things a person can misinterpret. God's Word is truth!
What we need to know about ourselves from God's Word and our only hope of being justified before God: [WHY WE HAVE NO HOPE IN OURSELVES: Mk. 7:20-23 And he (Jesus) said, That which comes out of the man, that defiles the man. For from within, out of the heart of men, proceed evil thoughts, adulteries, fornications, murders, thefts, covetousness, wickedness, deceit, lasciviousness, an evil eye, blasphemy, pride, foolishness: All these evil things (sins) come from within, and defile the man.] [WHY WE NEED A SAVIOR: Rom. 3:10-28 As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one: There is none that understands, there is none that seeks after God. They are all gone out of the way, they are together become unprofitable; there is none that does good, no, not one. Their throat is an open sepulchre; with their tongues they have used deceit; the poison of asps is under their lips: Whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness: Their feet are swift to shed blood: Destruction and misery are in their ways: And the way of peace have they not known: There is no fear of God before their eyes. Now we know that what things so ever the law says, it says to them who are under the law: that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God. Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his (God's) sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin. But now the righteousness of God without the law is manifested, being witnessed by the law and the prophets; Even the righteousness of God which is by faith of Jesus Christ to all and upon all them that believe: for there is no difference: For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God; Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus: Whom God has set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God; To declare, I say, at this time his righteousness: that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believes in Jesus. Where is boasting then? It is excluded. By what law? Of works? Nay: but by the law of faith. Therefore we conclude that man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law. Joh. 3:16 For God so loved the world (us), that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believes in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. Joh. 14:6 Jesus said to him (us), I am the way (salvation), the truth (assurance), and the life (eternal): no man comes to (God) the Father, but by me (God the Son). Rom. 5:1 Therefore being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ:]
@Kent Paulhamus you sure like to cherry pick from the Bible, I wonder, do you BELIEVE it is ALL the true word of god or do you only believe in the parts that you like?
@@tiredofliars I do not cherry pick from God's Word. 2 Tim. 3:16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: I can only give God's Word and pray that God through the Holy Spirit will work in the hearts of those who read his Word and come to believe with a repentant heart and put their faith in Jesus Christ as their Lord and savior. God's Word will either offend you or bring you to repentance of your sinfulness. Rom. 6:23 For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord. Rom. 3:23 For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;
@@kentpaulhamus2158 So you BELIEVE that everything in the Bible is the TRUE word of god? So, you are fine with abortion? You do know that god sanctioned abortion, and not only sanctioned it, but set the price for it 2400 years ago. Not only that, there are no term limits on WHEN that abortion can be performed, it could be the day before the expected birth, and if the father wants to pay the price, then the priest will force the woman to drink the filth, urine, feces, blood, and all the runoff from slaughtering animals, and if she vomits so hard as to miscarry, then she is to be taken out and stoned as an adulteress, and if she DOES NOT vomit so hard to dislodge the child, it MAGICALLY becomes the offspring of the husband, even if he had been away for a year and his wife is six months pregnant. And you are fine with rape as long as the rapist PAYS the father of the victim 30 shekels of silver and marries his victim, that way he can rape her from then on? That is OK with you morally? How about all the added books to the Bible? In Deuteronomy, BOOK 5, written in 478 BC, it says do not add or remove from these books, yet, 900 years later the Catholic Church invented the New Testament, You are FINE with ADDING anywhere from 61 to 74 additional books to the bible, depending on which VERSION of the over 400 versions that have been invented in the last 500 years you BELIEVE is the TRUE one?. Of course, if you are not using one of the ORIGINALS then are you using one of the NEW versions of God's Unchanging Word?
Here is a challenge for you, ask that Holy Spirit you claim to be in communication with to give you the exact words that will convert me to YOUR CULT of Chrsitinsanity, if your god (Who is all powerful, all knowing, all caring, etc.) cannot give you those words, then I have to assume that your particular CULT is one of the 41000 false ones out there that have been invented over the last 500 years.
Your bible claims that you will be able to convert me. It claims that your god will give you the words. So, if you cannot come up with those words, you are a false liar and you are worshiping a false god OR your god simply does not exist and you are deluded and anywhere from mildly to extremely psychotic.
@@kentpaulhamus2158 By the way, CHERRY PICKING is the process of PICKING a single statement from a work of fiction and trying to say it has meaning outside of the chapter, verse and BOOK it is CHOSEN from to be put with OTHER singular statements from OTHER books. THAT IS WHAT YOU DO!!!! LOL! You are a habitual cherry picker!
Here is the entirety of 2 Timothy 3 for you,
But mark this: There will be terrible times in the last days. 2 People will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, proud, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, 3 without love, unforgiving, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not lovers of the good, 4 treacherous, rash, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God- 5 having a form of godliness but denying its power. Have nothing to do with such people.
6 They are the kind who worm their way into homes and gain control over gullible women, who are loaded down with sins and are swayed by all kinds of evil desires, 7 always learning but never able to come to a knowledge of the truth. 8 Just as Jannes and Jambres opposed Moses, so also these teachers oppose the truth. They are men of depraved minds, who, as far as the faith is concerned, are rejected. 9 But they will not get very far because, as in the case of those men, their folly will be clear to everyone.
A Final Charge to Timothy
10 You, however, know all about my teaching, my way of life, my purpose, faith, patience, love, endurance, 11 persecutions, sufferings-what kinds of things happened to me in Antioch, Iconium and Lystra, the persecutions I endured. Yet the Lord rescued me from all of them. 12 In fact, everyone who wants to live a godly life in Christ Jesus will be persecuted, 13 while evildoers and impostors will go from bad to worse, deceiving and being deceived. 14 But as for you, continue in what you have learned and have become convinced of, because you know those from whom you learned it, 15 and how from infancy you have known the Holy Scriptures, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus. 16 All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, 17 so that the servant of God[a] may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.
SO, SELF PROCLAIMED "servant of god", do you feel fully equipped to deal with me, a simple man who actually has read the entire bible (well one version of it, with a lot of snippets from some of the hundreds of others) and knows not only what books were added when, but WHY they were added, or REMOVED or altered to suit the current ruler. Do you EMBRACE the HOLY WORD OF GOD (which is only the first five books by the way) as true? Then why do you not READ ALL OF IT? Also, who are these people Jannes and Jambres, they do not appear anywhere else in the Holy Word of God, the Bible or anywhere but this chapter! Let me guess, they were mentioned in one of the books of the bible that were removed by one pope or another during the 1100 years the Catholic Church took to create the current version of THEIR bible. Do you find it strange that the religion that invented the book, continued to add to it after a CULT broke away with only part of the complete works of the holy word of god?
So, in summary, you say that the word of god is true, so therefore, it is true, so no need to answer for the contradictions.
This is, it's not just Noah, every culture has a similar story
I also like how every every culture has giants and dragons; the term dinosaur didn't show up until the 1840s.
@@Mackerelly But yet, not a single dinosaur fossil mixed in the same strata as humans or our recent evolutionary ancestors. It gives the appearance that you’re referring to something known as mythology or folklore.
@@dross4207 Dinosaurs did not have hands and feet to climb to higher ground as humans do. In most cases, man was smarter than to live around carnivores. Soft dinosaur tissue (decalcified) has now been found on five continents attesting to the fact dinosaurs were much more contemporary and did in fact live at the time of man. Peruvian Ica Burial Stones and Acambara Mexico figurines found by the tens of thousands prove that man had interactions with dinosaurs as early as 3500 years ago. By the way Dinosaur and human footprints have been found together in a Glen Rose Texas. Get up to speed and think a little.
No but there are plenty of birds and mammals mixed in with the Dino boneyards that supposedly didnt evolve until multiple millions of years later.
@@rachelnaisbett9712No one ever said that mammals couldn’t or didn’t coexist with dinosaurs. Humans didn’t. And no mammals, or any land creature at all, are found in lower layers of strata. How is that possible if a worldwide flood wiped out all of the animals from mice, to rats, to dogs, to cows, to elephants, to dinosaurs, to humans? Why did not a single land animal get fossilized in those lower strata when they would be among the first to succumb to a flood?
Name one source that says that mammals or birds couldn’t or didn’t exist alongside dinosaurs.
I Choose to walk by faith and not by sight
That is an extremely dangerous path since people can do anything based upon faith...
@thedubwhisperer2157
You're right, like believe in the "big bang" or evolution of everything from a microscopic cell that just magical appeared. Now that would take unlimited blind faith.
@@ayeright1131 How do you know I believe in that - did you hear a voice in your head?
@@thedubwhisperer2157
I never said you did 🙄
I was simply making a point.
Don't get your wee panties in a twist petal.
Praise God! Thank you for this very well done video
If only Christians were as fervent about the true gospel of Jesus as the atheist are committed to their blind faith in their foolish lies.
@@edbrackeen5979 Have YOU read the entire Bible? Beginning to end without stopping, without trying to twist the "WORD OF GOD" into what you WANT it to say? If you BELIEVE that the BIBLE is truly the word of god, then why are you on the Internet? Your bible instructs you to do certain things that you are certainly not doing. Do you know WHY you do not live your life according to the rules in the bible, because if you tried you would end up in prison in 90% of the countries of the world.
@Bass Acoustic Electric Classical Guitar Lessons
You actually should refrain from lazy childish regurgitations of bs some MarXist fed you and actual learn the truth by personal due diligence...!
@Guitar Lessons What’s the lie?
@Guitar Lessons Jesus fulfilled the law and became our law. We are not under Old Testmant law any more. The OT is for our learning but Jesus is our “law” now.
I really like these videos. They are fast, concise, and not boring as some other Creation shows. The speaker is engaging and intelligent, and well spoken, except when in inexplicably says burr'ee'ul instead of burial.
Yes, a rather convincing liar . . . capable of fooling most ignorant cowards.
That's the correct pronunciation.
@@slik00silk84 Everything he said was provable truth.
@@bite-sizedshorts9635 As I said . . . .convincing to ignorant cowards! You really think that you, or the clown in this circus show, know more than the millions of geologists that laugh at your so ignorant beliefs???? Think about this: If the young age of the Earth is true, why is it so damn obvious that the mountains in the Eastern USA are so much older than the mountains in the Western USA?
4500 years ago nobody would have had any idea whether a flood was local or worldwide.
If your local mountains were underwater for several months, the flood would have to be global.
@@customsongmaker Depends how high are the mountains. According to the Bible the flood was only 15 cubits / 23 ft / 7m deep. How did that cover all the mountains on Earth? Well, obviously, there were no higher mountains at that time, the mountains only rose AFTER the flood. Simple! But in case that sounds ridiculous (!) there is another interpretation that this depth was the draught of the Ark, not the depth of the flood. So if the flood was deep enough to cover the highest mountains the amount of extra water required would need to be more than half the total ocean water in the world today. And all of that water went ……….. ??
@@gweilospur5877 15 cubits deep from where? The tops of the mountains? As for where the water went, it currently covers ~70% of the Earth's surface. There's also plenty underground, and recent news says there's more water bound near the Earth's core than in the oceans.
@@customsongmaker I’m talking about the ridiculously huge amount of EXTRA water that would have been needed to cover as high as Everest (and 15 cubits higher). To say nothing of the fact that nobody in the Middle East in those days would even have any idea how high Everest was, or that Everest was the highest mountain. Where did that water come from, and then where did it go? How would anybody 4500 years ago know that the entire world was experiencing a flood? Did they turn on the TV and see it on CNN? Did they phone people in other countries using their mobiles? Did the Ark circumnavigate the globe to see that it was all flooded? The entire story is ridiculous in so many ways that it isn’t even worthy of consideration.
@@gweilospur5877 There are helpful scientific details in the story. #1, there was no rain at a certain point in history before the Flood. #2, there were no rainbows. #3, human lifespan drastically decreased afterwards.
Since the primary cause of aging is cellular damage from the sun's free radical radiation, an enormous and constant layer of clouds would filter the sun's radiation, and prevent rainbows, and provide a source for enough water to flood the globe.
Thanks and may the almighty bless you for increasing our faith. Man can beat aroubd the bush but the wisdom comes from almighty
Many, if not all, of the observations quoted are in science explained by continental drift and plate tectonics.
Also a touch of [super] volcanic activity, meteoric impacts, polar shifting, and glacial drift/ till. Large-scale flooding and mass extinction events aren't even refuted by current secular models.
Where the Biblical theory deviates is by assuming a single event produced all the worldwide evidence of calamity... with only 8 human survivors and their farm animals on a 500 ft wherry that somehow produced the vast diversity of modern terrestrial fauna without the aid of evolution.
I believe in the Word of God. I believe Jesus Christ is who the Bible says He is. I believe Jesus is going to do what the Bible says He will do. Also I believe I'm who and what the Lord says I am. Waiting on you Lord to bring me home.
I believe in the Word of God, I believe Jesus Christ is who the Bible says he is. I believe Jesus is going to do what the Bible says he will do. I believe I'm who and what the Lord says I am. But, I just still can't believe that Donald Trump was ever the President.
Good luck with that
Praise YAH enjoyed the video. Thanks for all your efforts.
An average atmospheric river can carry roughly the same amount of water as the average flow at the mouth of the Mississippi River, but exceptionally strong ones can transport up to 15 times that amount, meaning they can carry a massive volume of water vapor, equivalent to several times the flow of the Mississippi River
Started believing long time ago!
The truth is the truth no matter what man says and God cannot lie that’s enough for me to believe God’s truth. Thank you for your faith and video’s Brother. God bless you.
How do you know it is the thruth? Do you know how the bible was made?
I also believe in God's truth....i just realize that man often puts his own spin on God's word. The biblical story of the flood is taken from even more ancient flood myths. Recognizing that much of the Bible is fables created to make a point does NOT lessen the overall impact of the Bible! If you really want the truth...compare the first chapters of the Book of Genesis with the theory of the creation of the universe. Each step of Genesis matches what we know...the only difference is the timeline.
@vchism712 no it doesnt.
@@vchism712 You did not answered the question! What makes you so sure...? There is no proof and even the Genesis is just something on paper which is not available as the original document. Even it would be available.... where is the proof? Why you so sure about god? Other religion have also a good, so which one is the real one? If there is more than one???
That's it! The best evidence thus far! The trees fossilized standing up; right where they grew. The sedimentary "layers" cannot thus be attributed to millions of years of deposition.
THANK YOU❤
We've understood polystrate fossils for over a century. They didn't take millions of years and they're not proof of a flood.
duped again....
Where are all the human fossils?
@@thedubwhisperer2157
Well I guess humans don't fossilize very well. Besides, the dinos have got the market covered in fossils.
@@thedubwhisperer2157most humans probably got to high ground the first few days the flood was happening since they had knowledge of most of the terrain near them which the other animals didn’t have knowledge of. Also creatures like most mammals, most reptiles, and birds just don’t fossilize well since they aren’t massive or aquatic
This post is hysterical! :)
The tree trunk going thru many layers of strata is very damning to the evolution proponents at 4:36.
I was hoping the whole video was about that tree, but he flew right past it.
It'd be cool to know more about it in greater detail.
No it's not. Polystrate objects like trees are buried, fossilised so now they are mineralised and distinct from their strata. The strata erodes and slow burial covers them with new layers.
No it's not.
With just eight people on board the Ark, how was it possible to deal with all the food input and output of all those animals?
No response, lol
None of us were there lol. But if Jesus believed the story (being God Himself), then who am I to doubt it? He also said that when He returns, the condition of the world will be similar to what it was in the days of Noah - they shut the knowledge of God out of their lives. He predicted it, and we're seeing the fulfillment of His words.
The Tetragrammaton, ancient 4 letters for the unique N. of God. The causative form of the verb To be. He can cause Himself to overcome any (for us) obstacle. The animals might have been made compliant, not by Noah. The Ark was only required to float. Naval ratio of 6:1. Possibly size of the British Museum. A Christian keeps JC commandments. He said when praying (all of John Chapter 17) to the Creator, verse 17 "Your word is truth". Otherwise calling our Ransomer a liar. Christendom, the Bible's false friend. Embraced wholeheartedly evolution, unscriptural dogma. World Wars 1 & 2 began by the divided denominations of so-called Christianity. 🕊
And how did he feed the animals on this ark. Logistically impossible with only six humans on the ark. Load of tosh
New subscriber. This presentation is so well done. Please keep up the good work.
Children Story
@@oscarsotelo8548 Jesus loves u
@@oscarsotelo8548Only because (perhaps) the only images etched in your mind are the silly, childish pictures of small houseboats with giraffe's necks and elephant's trunks sticking out of silly little windows... Those pathetic posters may have been painted and erected by sincere folks, but they lacked truth and understanding.... They were not worthy of the wall space they occupied.
Now go read the epic of Gilgamesh, the story of unapishtum and the story of atra hasis.. those are the actual myths Noah was copied from in fact the Bible version actually used summerian loan words proving that noah was just a copy of a much older story... Genesis itself was just copied from the Sumerian enuma elish. Do some research
@4everseekingwisdom690
Thanks. I too am seeking wisdom. There are numerous flood accounts. Awesome.
I found them. These are the kids left behind. Y'all really never learned about plate tectonics? It debunks all of this. "How are there fossils in the Himalayas?" Easy. India was an island and collided, over millions of years, with Asia slowly pushing mountains up. It's a process we can accurately measure today.
Excellent! Thank you for teaching this important truth.
The important truth is that Noah's Ark never happened
@@keithziegler8881 Noah's Ark has been found in Turkey, do a search.
Just tell me one thing, why if God is so loving and kind did he consider it acceptable to kill every living creature on the surface of the earth apart from a chosen few. A far greater genocide than anyone else has ever committed in the history of the Earth.
@@philiprobinson2011 the scriptures tell us why, "The LORD saw that the wickedness of man was great upon the earth, and that every inclination of the thoughts of his heart was altogether evil all the time" Genesis 6:5.
I thought God created man in his own image. So he either did a very bad job, or he has a very bad temper and preferred to kill rather than change things peacefully. I suppose it might explain why he also created the Devil, disease and suffering. Perhaps he is not the loving God after all? @@Sundayschoolnetwork
May God Bless your ministry 😊
Perhaps that's why beach rocks were uncovered about 890 km inland in Labrador in the early 1960's. 🙏
Or why shellfish fossils are found on the top of Mt Everest
As a web developer, I know logic... and this guy's logic is much sounder than the other scientifici arguments.
OMNG that is idiotic. You clearly dont know logic.
Thank you that was very very interesting. And very well put together period
Awesome video! Thanks for posting
I'm particularly impressed at the comments here from people who, despite apparently having no education or understanding of geology or paleontology, and having never read any books or papers on the topic, are convinced their observation of a fossil above present day sea level is enough to wholly overturn the work of the thousands of scientists who've spent a lifetime studying it. Mazel tov!
Get ready for winter, says God or the Ram, as he leaves the upper hemisphere, Eden, Paradise or summer, and he will be obeyed, or the neglect will be punished accordingly.
"And the rain was upon the earth forty days and forty nights" (Gen. 7:12).
Now it happens, and curiously enough too, that the very next month after the Lord had shut Noah and his companions in the ark, was called Bul, in Hebrew; in English Rain, because of the heavy rains it brings. The word mabul, here translated "flood" is by grammatical construction, a participle of but, to rain, and should have been translated raining, as having reference to the rainy season, rather than flood, which simply means the flowing of water in a swollen stream, or river. Here, then, we have another of the many proofs that this legend did not originate in Egypt, which is comparatively a rainless country, but in some district where they have but two seasons, the wet and the dry, as in Hindustan, or India; and this is now coming into general belief.
… "The entrance into the ark was considered as a descent into Tartarus (Hell); the liberation from it was deemed a passage into Elysium (Heaven)." (Faber, Pag. Idol., vol. 1, p. 374.) …
Typhon (Hill-Sun = Lord) constructed an ark of curious workmanship. Into this Osiris (the Sun) entered, and was shut up by Typhon. This was the same Deity that shut Noah and his family into the ark." (Jacob Bryant, vol. 3, p. 168.) "The ark was spoken of by the mythologists as the mother of mankind." (Ibid.) So was the earth spoken of as the mother of mankind, and truly too. "On the return of Osiris to Egypt, Typhon laid a stratagem for him, and contrived, in the midst of a feast (the ingathering), to shut him up in a chest which exactly fitted his body. This took place on the 17th day of the month ahthyr, when the Sun was in Scorpio." (Prichard's Egypt. Myth., p. 58.) Osiris, after escaping, returns to Egypt (winter) every year in autumn.
Though it rained but "forty days and forty nights," " the waters prevailed, and did not abate from off the earth until after the end of one hundred and fifty days," = the rainy season in either hemisphere, and corresponding in the northern, to the months October, November, December, January and February, while the Sun is below the equator.
Yes, thousands of scientists with a certain paradigm to follow, lest their funding dries up.
You already forgot about the scientific concensus during covid. No way scientists can get things wrong. Trust the science 🐑
@@ShruteFarms001 thanks for that. Perhaps the defining feature of religious fundamentalism is dogmatism. The world is black and white. There's Hell on one hand, Heaven on the other. The saved and the damned. There are god-given eternal truths that they can be known with 100% certainty. When fundamentalists look at science with this mindset, they imagine that finding even a single flaw in a scientific hypothesis means science itself is fatally flawed. After all, isnt that how their theology works? But science has a completely different paradigm. It deals in probabilities and relative confidence, not absolute certainties. Finding a flaw in a scientific hypothesis doesn't undermine science itself. On the contrary, science advances mainly through a process of deliberately trying to find the flaws in a hypothesis so it can be thrown out or amended to fit reality more closely. That's how we got from shouting to being able to communicate across thousand of miles using satellites and computers. Meanwhile, fundamentalist thinkers are still stuck with ideas about sheep and goats thought up by pastoralists in the patriarchal ancient Near East
This series is incredible. This episode says it all. Thank you and God Bless!
"Incredible" as in "not credible". I agree.
It's easy to make claims when you ignore everything that refutes them. Guess it's true, ignorance is bliss.
On May 18, 1980, when I was just sixteen years old and was driving to work, I thought that Seattle had been "nuked". I watched the sky darken, as an enormous black cloud stretched from the southernmost point of the visible horizon to the northernmost point, pushing eastward, enveloping the entire landscape in just hours. I was living in Kalispell, MT, and Mount St. Helens had just erupted, sending its black clouds up into the atmosphere.
Months later, after all was said and done, scientists who went to Washington state to examine the aftermath of the cataclysmic event looked at newly-formed draws and what New Mexicans call "arroyos", where the water had quickly receded from the millions of tons of melted snow and ice that were expelled from the mountain at the time of the eruption. What they saw were almost EXACT replicas of the Grand Canyon and other, similar examples of rapidly retreating waters, where layer upon layer of various sediments and debris were stratified in very short order(NOT over millions of years, but in just weeks or months). There were the same examples of trees and other captured objects that traversed multiple layers of strata, just as we see in the Grand Canyon and at other sites around the world.
The evidence showed that, contrary to popular belief, the rocky ground of the Grand Canyon WASN'T "carved" by the little "creek" that is the Colorado River. It is simply following the contours of the deep canyon that was created in the cataclysmic aftermath of the global flood spoken about in the Bible, and what has been taught for centuries in MANY spoken traditions of peoples all around the globe. And while we're at it, the Colorado would have had to flow UPHILL in a couple of instances for many of those "millions of years", in order for the theory of a "millions of years old Earth" to be correct. Notice that the far more impressive Mississippi River rests on dirt & sand, and has supposedly been flowing for just as great a period of time, but has exactly HOW deep of a canyon? Right. No "canyon" exists in that case. How curious.
And, when was a kid, and lived in Hideaway Park, CO (in the 1970's), I occasionally found small shells which appeared to have been from an aquatic origin. That was at over 8500 feet above sea level. I have no reason to doubt the Biblical account of the Global Flood, or of our intelligent design. Anyone who is familiar with microbiology should also see the beauty of how each living thing has been made. We, and everything else we see on Earth are nothing short of amazing and miraculous.
I agree for the most part, but Noahs flood was not the only one. There was a world age before this present one, which ended with a massive flood event which lasted much longer than 150 days, and left the earth without form and void.
This is all nonsense. you are spreading lies and know nothing about the science that your are refering to. annoying!!!
Lets entertain that this flood existed. Doesn't make it biblical, people make it biblical and start expanding on the stories that were made up like the ark. The Chinese whisper effect takes place. How did they know it was a world wide flood? What was their communication system with the other side of the world back then?
It is similar to this reported finding of the Ark. Lets assume they did find some wood up there. Many people here are like "That is it! The ark was found and therefore the bible is true!"
Slow your roll people.
STEP 1> Prove whatever was found was an actual ark from the times we would expect. I dont want to hear "it must be an ark..." or some other assumption bs. I dont want to hear any of those crazy things. Dig that crap up and prove it is and ark by allowiing the scientific community as a whole access to the artifacts for an unbiased review. Only when this step is done can you go to step two.
STEP 2> Prove that this was Noahs Arc and was capable of the claims made by the bible. This one will be difficult to do but we cannot simply say "if it is an ark- it must be Noah's." Based on what?Once this step is done you can go to step 3
"STEP 3> Prove that there was a global flood. No matter how many misguided people hit this thread with comments about evidence of a flood- THERE IS NONE.... ZIP ....ZILCH. There is not one piece of evidence that is accepted by the science community as a whole that even obscurely points to a globel flood event. . All you have is the rambling of con artists like Wyatt.
So even though some of you think the search is over and the ark was found, that is not the case. You have a loooooooooong way to go to be able to make that claim. Happy hunting!
@@ThePlim62
The earth's crust is not static. It moves. Very slowly, but it moves (sometimes it moves quickly which we know as an earthquake). What was once the bottom of an ocean becomes the top of a mountain. That is how early life, which lived in the oceans, ended up on the tops of mountains. One of the most famous such places is the Burgess Shale in British Columbia, Canada. As far as floods go, most of the people on earth live close to water. That is more or less a necessity given about 60% of a humans body weight is water (a remnant of our evolutionary past), and we leak water at a fairly rapid rate. One of the things we know about rivers is that they flood on a regular basis. Stories of floods then, are pretty common around the world. Was there a worldwide flood? Look at the world today. Roughly 70% of the earth's surface is covered with water, so one could say we live in a time that has a 70% world-wide flood.
This is a prime example of the type of close mindedness that plagues academic science, which is obviously where your *thesis was derived. It's entirely possible that there was a flood which reached the tops of mountains, yet you and the academics you get your *facts from refuse to allow that possibility to enter your minds. Keep talking, and keep showing the world just how screwed up and prejudice academia is. Please, go on.
Thank you for input.
@@cradlecap123 Your welcome 🙂
Hey listen, I’m not saying this in a mean way but evolution (man evolving from apes) is pure fantasy. Give me just one observable evidence for evolution that doesn’t require faith?
Every living thing produces after their kind, humans produce humans and dogs produce dogs, etc.
There are different variations within a kind (which is biblical) but living things remain within their own and natural selection is science just not the theory that we evolved from apes, etc.
If you agree that dogs share a common ancestor that is a dog, then we have no problem. The problem starts when people start using their imagination (sponge bob style) and call that science.
There are different definitions of evolution but again, the theory that we evolved from animals and animals changed into something they are not is pure fantasy.
What we actually observe today is all there has ever been, living things remain within their own.
The theory of evolution and the big bang is anti-science because it's not observable or testable.
There are so many problems with those theories.
Like, where did all the complex elements that supposedly made us come from?
Evolutionary scholars believe that the creation of life involved waters but here's the big problem with that. Sunlight and water destroy DNA, the very thing that destroys DNA somehow assembled it?
So how did the DNA code originate?
What came first-DNA or the repair enzymes that are necessary to maintain DNA? You need both at the same time, the information for the repair enzymes is encoded into the DNA itself. This all has to be true simultaneously or living things don’t exist.
Just so many problems these theories can't answer because it's nothing more than political propaganda and yet we wonder why our society is the way it is.
Who determines what good and evil are?
👉Society does not determine morality.👈
I'm only saying these things because your life matter to God, he created you with a purpose. He has been misrepresented by people who don't know him, Christianity is not church attendance and religion is dead but having a personal relationship with God is everything.
No such thing as evolution. Creation.
Great points. Thanks for posting.
Stupid points. He recycles his videos with clickbait titles. None of it is new
This One Trick will fool Creationists
Ask them, "When the Ark landed and the people came out onto dry land, what did booth the people and the animals eat?" Importantly, what did the carnivores eat? We can see that the salted ground won't be growing anything any time soon after the people landed. This one trick can show that the story is just a myth - copied from the Babylonians and earlier peoples.
Get ready for winter, says God or the Ram, as he leaves the upper hemisphere, Eden, Paradise or summer, and he will be obeyed, or the neglect will be punished accordingly.
"And the rain was upon the earth forty days and forty nights" (Gen. 7:12).
Now it happens, and curiously enough too, that the very next month after the Lord had shut Noah and his companions in the ark, was called Bul, in Hebrew; in English Rain, because of the heavy rains it brings. The word mabul, here translated "flood" is by grammatical construction, a participle of but, to rain, and should have been translated raining, as having reference to the rainy season, rather than flood, which simply means the flowing of water in a swollen stream, or river. Here, then, we have another of the many proofs that this legend did not originate in Egypt, which is comparatively a rainless country, but in some district where they have but two seasons, the wet and the dry, as in Hindustan, or India; and this is now coming into general belief.
… "The entrance into the ark was considered as a descent into Tartarus (Hell); the liberation from it was deemed a passage into Elysium (Heaven)." (Faber, Pag. Idol., vol. 1, p. 374.) …
Typhon (Hill-Sun = Lord) constructed an ark of curious workmanship. Into this Osiris (the Sun) entered, and was shut up by Typhon. This was the same Deity that shut Noah and his family into the ark." (Jacob Bryant, vol. 3, p. 168.) "The ark was spoken of by the mythologists as the mother of mankind." (Ibid.) So was the earth spoken of as the mother of mankind, and truly too. "On the return of Osiris to Egypt, Typhon laid a stratagem for him, and contrived, in the midst of a feast (the ingathering), to shut him up in a chest which exactly fitted his body. This took place on the 17th day of the month ahthyr, when the Sun was in Scorpio." (Prichard's Egypt. Myth., p. 58.) Osiris, after escaping, returns to Egypt (winter) every year in autumn.
Though it rained but "forty days and forty nights," " the waters prevailed, and did not abate from off the earth until after the end of one hundred and fifty days," = the rainy season in either hemisphere, and corresponding in the northern, to the months October, November, December, January and February, while the Sun is below the equator.
But he said to him, If they do not hear Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded though one rise from the dead.
[LUKE 16:31]
If you do not believe what is written in the Bible, neither will you be persuaded by anything.
This also makes me think of the seas rushing over the land during a possible pole reversal , the diehold foundation talks about the cyclical events connected to our sun which could cause another noahs flood
The magnetic poles can reverse with NO physical changes needed or expected. The actual spin axis does not reverse; EVER.
Either way it wouldn't happen bc God promised He wouldn't do that again.
@@thomasmaughan4798 have a look at the Diehold Foundation, it's interesting to see what has been put together there from studying the earth. It suggests that the spin can and does reverse with catastrophic results.
On day 2 of creation God created a firmament over the Earth. He put the sun, moon and stars within it. The Bible tells us over and over again that the Earth does not move. Man says the Earth spins at 1000 mph while it supposedly orbits the sun at 66,600 mph all while our "galaxy" hurtles through "space" at 515,00 mph yet we cannot feel it. All this movement yet Polaris stays fixed and age after age Orion's Belt still aligns with the Pyramids of Giza.
Believe God, not man.
@@scotthenry3401 Well now I know what NOT to look at. So suddenly one day the sun rises in the west instead of the east? Dayum.
Well, okay, I'll look at that rabbit hole. Diehold Foundation.
When I was in Malta there was a lot of shells on cliff sides way above the ocean.
As a child, it always struck me that in order to become fossilized a creature had to be buried completely. Otherwise it would have been scavenged, dragged around, and exposed to the weather, to the point where there is nothing left. It might happen once and a while, but not often enough to account for all the fossilized remains that we've found. As a child I never put this together with the flood. Now I realize it's the only way.
Not always true. Often a creature is fossilised because it has been submerged. Floods happen all the time, everywhere. Right now there is a non flood example of sudden burial in Papua New Guinea. It's a terrible tragedy. And a geological regularity. The Thames in Britain famously has people who are the only ones permitted to scavenge in the mud there, they regularly find old items from ancient times. Up to and including bodies.
You would have to pretend that such frequent flooding, mud burials and others were unlikely to have caused fossilisation and somehow only the Noachian flood was the one.
Further, we have fossils from dessication. Not sure how they happened in a global flood.
Modern biologists would ignore the overwhelming evidence of the flood, and yet, they find a piece of bone and immediately say it's "the missing link".
You should mention that 98% of scientists ignore the idea of a flood, mainly because the evidence doesn't support it. But 98% of apologists and biblical literalists have an overwhelming amount of evidence...
I believe exactly what Genesis says. It's so detailed, and organizations like ICR and AIG have also shown the evidence very well. I believe the Old Testament and New Testament.
So you believe exactly what the bible says. I would call that rather dim.
Children Story
I've watched several of your videos and I find them interesting. Will you please address carbon dating? It would be helpful.
It's on the main website. It's been covered in depth
@@westensanchez9483 God can change the rate of radioactive decay, didn't you know that god is not bound to the laws of physics? LOL!! If these people TRULY believed, they would not need to justify their belief because their god can do anything and leaving evidence is not one of it's strong points.
@@tiredofliars you clearly don't understand carbon dating. I'm guessing your teacher told you how it worked and you believed him without question? You've traded one dogma for another and don't even realize it. Lol
Pfft basic elements like weather and exposure change radioactive decay, we don’t need God for that 😙
God's great flood was extremely destructive to Earth, it completely changed the planet, broke up all the tectonic plates, forced the giant mountains upward , when God chose to destroy all living things he doesn't play games , but there will always be a remnant , our Amazing God and the amazing Ark allowed the human race to carry on AMEN
excellent information!
It always makes me laugh to hear MILLIONS of years ago. God is awesome.
How old is your god?
How did your god come into existence? If god can just exist without being created, then so can the universe
But your God is guilty of the worst crimes, certainly not awesome, quite the opposite.
@@benscrwbiutb9800 If you think of the universe as a Box it can't just pop into existence on it's own because that would violate the laws of physics which allow the universe to exist in a constant state. But if God created the universe including the laws of physics which do not apply to God and prevent them from just existing because God created them as well as the universe.
So in short God can exist out of nothing but the universe can't because the universe is bound by rules while God is not.
@@arc001 Is he? After all is it illegal to give someone their punishment? You have to have an executioner.
The punishment for sin is death and all men have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God. So really when God goes around killing people all he is doing is giving them their punishment and even then he gives them a way out if they will accept it. And even then death is a lot more complex in the bible as there is both spiritual and physical death.
If you never been to the Ark replica in Kentucky it is so worth your time. It’s so much bigger than you can imagine. The interior seems bigger than the outside. Very, very cool.
The only reason I would ever go to the ark in Kentucky is to watch it burn down
Yeah...using taxpayers dollars to build this fantasy boat would so be worth my precious time seeing you zealot wing ding.
Catastrophic flood? Floods that move sediments are turbulent. Layered sediments are not created by fast moving flood that move massive amounts of material chaotically from one place to another. Another issue of chaotically turbulent flood flows is that dinosaur fossils should be found mixed with marine fossils. This is definitely not the case. BTW, where did all the water go??
Thank you for your insight and contribution!
Love your work sooo much Answers In Genesis. Blessings from Australia.
You never see any kangaroos or koalas going onto the Ark.
Great video, such solid evidence. Glory to God!
Welton know it doesn't have solid evidence. That just tell you to understand what actual evidence is.
The ACTUAL solid evidence has already demonstrated that the Noah's Ark myth is exactly that a myth that we know for a FACT did not happen
@@keithziegler8881 Stating that doesn't prove it. give the evidence(that isn't debunked by the video) please.
@@shaunmeyer8822 this video does not debunk anything because it's not real science.
Real science has proven that the Noah's Ark fantasy is exactly that… A fantasy that didn't happen.
Just as REAL science has established fact that the earth is billions of years old and evolution is a fact.
It's not my job to educate you on these things, I get paid when I educate people my get paid very well… So well that you could not afford me.
I'm not here to convince someone like you, you're lost.
But there are people on the fence that I can't convince the get away from your nonsense and your BS self-hatred religion and I do that every day
Nope -nonsense
Wise up
Multiple mega sequences of sediment layers with samples of animals living at the time of the global flood is undeniable evidence.
What do you mean??
@@mattikaronen7728 My “religion” is truth. If it’s not true, I don’t want any part of it. The geology that we have of a number of mega sequences of consecutive water deposited sediment layers over a mile deep with fossils in them around the world on every continent necessitates a global flood catastrophe. I know that hurts the belief of every other made up alternate narrative. It just happens to be a fact that we are all the descendants of those who stepped off of the Ark in the area around Mesopotamia.
You can’t argue with known human history or ancient calendars going back only 5,000 years. The ancient civilizations are all descended from Noah who had sixteen grandsons that became the sixteen ancient the civilizations each with their own paternal haplogroup lineage. The Bible is the only text that outlines the following Table of Nations.
1) Tubal Italy K,
2) Javan Greek sea people T,
3) Tiras Thracians L,
4) Magog Asian O,
5) Meshek Siberians N,
6) Madai Medes Q,
7) Gomer Europeans R,
8) Arphaxad Arabs Hebrews I&J,
9) Elam Elamites H,
10) Asshur Assyrians G,
11) Aram Arameans F
12) Lud Lydians F2,
13) Cush Cushites A B & C.
14) Phut early Phoenicians E1,
15) Canaan Canaanites E2,
16) Mitzrayim Egyptians E3,
D is likely the Sinite tribe from Canaan.
C is the descendants of Nimrod since they can’t possibly be from anyone else.
Neanderthals are Japhethites and Denisovans are a mix of Japhethites and Hamites, not Semitic. It shows up on DNA maps and charts. Every grandson of Noah and their descendants have their own paternal Y chromosome haplogroup lineage! I can name all sixteen of them like I just did and give you each of their haplogroups!
The evolutionary out of Africa claim is exactly backwards since the *oldest* progenitor is Japheth the ancestor of Eurasians then the Semitic populations of Shem and then the Hamitic African is the youngest progenitor with their eldest sons connecting the three different families descended from the three sons of Noah.
It took me a while to understand that the evolutionary claim is assuming that SNP markers are being gained forming the stair steps out of Africa when *the reality is* that the original SNP markers cited are in fact being lost forming the opposite stair steps out of West Asia as known human history shows.
The stair step out of Africa claim has to be addressed because the SNP markers are *real* evidence but the evolutionary assumption is exactly backwards.
The correct view requires that the older most original genomes of the Japhethites be connected to the Semitics by way of the eldest son of Shem which is Arphaxad (IJ). Arphaxad’s descendants can share the (IJK) SNP marker with the descendants of his uncle Japheth while the descendants of his younger brothers do not share that same (IJK) SNP.
You have to root the tree with Japheth the oldest son of Noah and then the oldest son of Shem (IJ Arphaxad) and then Elam and then Asshur and then the youngest brothers Aram and Lud. So you have to begin with the *most original* Y chromosome of Noah’s oldest son Japheth and then the changes occur in the people who were born later. It’s not necessarily a stair step of descendency. It’s changes in the Y chromosome with time. *Arphaxad isn’t descended from Japheth.* He just shares a marker with his uncle that his father used to have when he was born. Shem then lost the marker when Arphaxad’s younger brothers were born.
The descendants of Shem are then connected to the descendants of Ham by way of Nimrod the King (C) the the eldest son of Cush who is the eldest son of Ham. So the Hamitic CF (xD&E) paternal haplogroup SNP marker was lost to the *odd ones out* and less original younger brothers and cousins verifying the Table of Nations outlined in Genesis.💥 Learn the Bible before trying to learn anything else.
It’s also noteworthy that the D paternal haplogroup lines up with the E2 haplogroup of Canaan which is his son’s tribe of Sinim the Biblical namesake of China. So the only Hamitic haplogroups outside of Africa are the C of Nimrod and the D of the Canaanite tribe of Sinim which is still there in Andaman, Tibetan, Mongolian, Chinese and Japanese areas today.
@@JungleJargon how did you determine that the bible is true?
The Bible is also clear that we do not live on a globe.
@@jannaswanson271 exactly. I guess god didn’t know about what the earth looked like back then… 🤣
Thank you for this testimony
Does calling it 'testimony' make it feel less made up?
I will believe in Jack and the Beanstalk before this.
Brand new subscriber here, so happy to have found your channel ❤️
I pray many skeptics will consider the evidence you present and start reading Scripture with a new understanding.
. . . . _or blast it like me_ . . . .
Well since the Scripture is wrong why would I waste my time reading it again?
no - you are a fool
I've watched this twice, still no evidence. Clearly Calvin is not a scientist and doesn't know how to interpret the evidence. His whole dietribe was "look at this, I think this points to a flood?". That's not how science works. Was any of his 'work' tested or peer reviewed?
Yeah you failed To convince me You probably convinced people who were already convinced though
Wow, you sound really smart. 🤔
@@redghost3170 Thank you
But then its not like you're interested huh. Remind me how to make fossil jellyfish? Jake
@@UserRandJ You could very easily Google it And learn how to make fossil jellyfish But I don't think you really want to
I think a vertical tree penetrating through multiple layers of sediment, supposedly separated by millions of years, is a pretty obvious indication that those layers were all layed down simultaneously to allow the tree to be fossilized in place. You simply do not want to see what is in front of your eyes.
As an atheist, now I'm convinced!
God exists! A brutal, merciless being who once wiped out almost the entire human race simply because they did not follow his moral ideas.
The good thing is, now that we know this thing actually exists, we will find a way to destroy it!
Religions can only be destroyed if childhood indoctrination is outlawed and religious ideas kept from children (a bit like alcohol) until the age of 18. They can then be free to get drunk on the 3000-odd available religions to see if one of them makes any sense whatsoever.
So it's bad for God, the creator, to wipe creation off the earth that was on mass, accepting grape, murder, theft, torture, and things like this as okay? To the point that only 8 people weren't doing and accepting this stuff? That's what you're saying?
Do you see the error in your thinking? Much love ❤️✝️
@@GogglesOstrich Of course this is bad. I am the (partly) creater of 3 children. Nothing gives me the right to wipe them off.
If a god exists and it has done these things, then it would be mankind's greatest enemy.
@@benbecker2004 False comparison. You didn't make those kids in the womb. You had intercourse with your spouse and the way God made everything to create in the womb takes place. You didn't make the process of a child forming in the womb. God did. So God is still the creator of your kids.
Now, let me use a correct analogy. God is the coder. He made a code that has free will, as in it has random outcome. The code gives a randomized outcome the coder didn't like, so the coder has the right to delete some of the code.
Your issue is the pride of life. You feel you're entitled to what you have. The reality is that you curse God, your creator, but he's so loving he's blessed you with children and so much.
Your enemy is the Devil. He's come to kill, steal, and destroy. You're like a criminal saying that you don't deserve death for murdering and graping 10 people. You don't understand how serious your sin is. You're a criminal on death row and you need a Savior. But you're reacting the Savior currently. Are you willing to accept the Savior? Who you did horrendous crimes against but they died so that justice could be served?
Much love ❤️✝️
@benbecker2004 False comparison. You didn't make those kids in the womb. You had intercourse with your spouse and the way God made everything to create in the womb took place. You didn't make the process of a child forming in the womb. God did. So God is still the creator of your kids.
Now, let me use a correct analogy. God is the coder. He made a code that has free will, as in it has random outcome. The code gives a randomized outcome the coder didn't like, so the coder has the right to delete some of the code.
Your issue is the pride of life. You feel you're entitled to what you have. The reality is that you curse God, your creator, but he's so loving he's blessed you with children and so much.
Thanks for the great video
Don't need a sign or evidence that it took place because GOD'S WORD is enough.
No. If I said that god said that he wanted humans to kill monkeys and apes, would you believe that because I said it was gods word?
@@JessicaLindsey-jw6nu CHOICE....
That wouldn't work in court!
@@JessicaLindsey-jw6nu argument not with me it's with God...
NOTHING will make me believe in Noah's flood!
the willforce is strong in you..
Poor choice of words, I concede. What about persuade? :)
Funny how they leave out penguins and other animals. Not to mention to make the Noah and young earth claim work, you have to believe in some sort of hyper evolution considering that they only consider "kinds" were loaded into the ark.
Plus they still leave the whole predators and prey coexisting on the ark and after without ruining the ecosystem. 😂
"NOTHING will make me believe in Noah's flood!"
It depends on how it is described. I have no doubt there was a flood, and a scribe wrote about it, and likely survived it on a boat. It was very likely the Euphrates river which in flood spreads out wide. It need only be about 10 miles wide to be impossible to see shore on either side. A scribe would write "the whole earth" is covered, when plainly it wasn't since a dove came back with an olive branch. The miraculous aspect is that floods of this magnitude is not expected in a desert climate, and Noah was warned to make a boat, which would have seemed absurd to everyone nearby. He would have taken animals common to that area, sheep and goats mostly.
"NOTHING will make me believe in Noah's flood!" You are a true believer of non-believing 😎
"Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful."
Lucius Annaeus Seneca.
Martin Luther King was not wise? Isaac Newton? Seek Him and He shall reveal himself to you. God bless you.
that comment makes no sense because it assumes that the common people 99,9% of humanity to be not wise, also wisdom itself is literally a religious concept (solomon) and all the most wise sages were from religion
So good world was full of life, i hope when jesus comes back he restores all of that
There will be a new heaven and a new earth, as the Word says.
Very funny stuff here, you guys rock. This will be my new favourite satire site for religious mockery. The leather vest was a nice touch, it is like the video is being hosted by the Village People. Keep up the good work by exposing the ridiculous ideas for what they are, nonsense.
There never was any global flood. Civilization in China (much of it recorded) continued uninterrupted from 20,000 years ago until today. A Flood would require 3 times as much water as there is above and below the surface of the earth.
Name some civilizations and the records proved articles about them also you think god can’t make more water.
@@antzag6983
The Chinese have 15,000 years history with no interruption and no Flood. How is that possible? Did the Flood miss China?. Here is the FACTS of history ----- Now what is your response?
*Chinese History and the Global Flood*
There is firm historical evidence that refutes the global flood. Young Earth Creationist claim that the world-wide flood occurred somewhere 2300 years after creation (creation being at 6000 years ago). The historical evidence is that no flood occurred in Northern China during the pat 15,000 years. For details, I included the Chinese reference to the available documents as well.
Nanzhuangtou (Chinese: 南庄头, Nánzhuāngtóu), dated 9,500-9,000 B.C.E, or 8,700-7,500 B.C.E is an Initial Neolithic site near Lake Baiyangdian in Xushui County, Hebei, China. The site was discovered under a peat bog. Over 47 pieces of pottery were discovered at the site. Nanzhuangtou is also the earliest Neolithic site yet discovered in northern China. There is evidence that the people at Nanzhuangtou had domestic dogs 10,000 years ago. Stone grinding slabs and rollers and bone artifacts were also discovered at the site. It is one of the earliest sites showing evidence of millet cultivation. Pottery can also be dated to 10,200 B.C.E.
The Early Neolithic period (7,000 B.C.E-5,000 B.C.E) succeeds Nanzhuangtou, and is characterized by the rise of farming villages across the alluvial .plains of China, as seen in the site of Peiligang.
5,000 B.C.E. - Hemudu culture - "The Hemudu culture [河姆渡文化 Hémǔdù wénhuà] (5500 B.C.E. to 3300 B.C.E was a Neolithic culture that flourished just south of the Hangzhou Bay in Jiangnan in modern Yuyao, Zhejiang, China. In the early Hemudu period is the maternal clan phase. Descent is said to be matrilineal and the social status of children and women is comparatively high. In the later periods, they gradually transitioned into patrilineal clans. During this period, the social status of men rose and descent is passed through the male line."
5,000 B.C.E. - Yangshao culture - "The Yangshao culture [仰韶文化 Yǎngsháo wénhuà] was a Neolithic culture that existed extensively along the Yellow River in China. It is dated from around 5000 B.C.E. to 3000 B.C.E. The culture is named after Yangshao, the first excavated representative village of this culture, which was discovered in 1921 in Henan Province by the Swedish archaeologist Johan Gunnar Andersson (1874-1960). The culture flourished mainly in the provinces of Henan, Shaanxi and Shanxi. The archaeological site of Banpo [半坡 Bàn pō] village, near Xi'an, is one of the best-known ditch-enclosed settlements of the Yangshao culture.”
5,000 B.C.E. - Majiabang culture - "The Majiabang culture [馬家浜文化 Mǎ jiā bāng wénhuà] was a Chinese Neolithic culture that existed at the mouth of the Yangtze River, primarily around Lake Tai near Shanghai and north of Hangzhou Bay. The culture spread throughout southern Jiangsu and northern Zhejiang from around 5000 BC to 3300 BC. The later part of the period is known as the Songze culture.”
3,800 B.C.E. - Majiayao culture - "The Majiayao culture [马家窑文化 Mǎ jiā yáo wénhuà] was a group of Neolithic communities who lived primarily in the upper Yellow River region in eastern Gansu, eastern Qinghai and northern Sichuan, China. The culture existed from 3300 B.C.E. to 2000 B.C.E The Majiayao culture represents the first time that the Upper Yellow River region was widely occupied by agricultural communities and it is famous for its painted pottery, which is regarded as a peak of pottery manufacturing at that time.”
3,100 B.C.E. - Qujialing culture - "The Qujialing culture [屈家嶺文化 Qū jiā lǐng wénhuà] (3400 B.C.E. to 2600 B.C.E.) was a Neolithic civilisation centered primarily around the middle Yangtze River region in Hubei and Hunan, China. The culture succeeded the Daxi culture and reached southern Shaanxi, northern Jiangxi and southwest Henan.”
3,000 B.C.E - Longshan culture - "The Longshan (or Lung-shan) culture [龙山文化 Lóngshān wénhuà], also sometimes referred to as the Black Pottery Culture, was a late Neolithic culture in the middle and lower Yellow River valley areas of northern China, dated from about 3000 B.C.E. to 2000 B.C.E. The culture is named after the modern town of Longshan (lit. 'Dragon Mountain') in the east of the area under the administration of Jinan, Shandong Province, where the first archaeological find (in 1928) and excavation (in 1930 and 1931) of this culture took place at the Chengziya Archaeological Site. Evidence of human sacrifice becomes more common in Shaanxi and the Central Plain in the late Longshan period.”
1,900 B.C. E.- Yueshi culture - "The Yueshi culture [ 岳石文化 Yuè shí wénhuà] of the Shandong region of China, is dated from 1900 B.C.E. to 1500 B.C.E. It spanned the period from the Late Neolithic to the early Bronze Age. In the Shandong area, it followed the Longshan culture period (c. 2600-1900 BC), and was later replaced by the Erligang culture. Yueshi was contemporary with the Erlitou culture and the early Erligang culture, both located to its west. The Tai-Yi Mountains (泰沂山脉) region in central Shandong is the core area of Yueshi, but as the Erligang state (commonly identified with the early Shang dynasty) expanded, Yueshi declined and retreated to the Shandong Peninsula in the east.”
1,900 B.C.E. - Erlitou culture - "The Erlitou culture [二里头文化 Èr lǐtou wénhuà] is an early Bronze Age urban society and archaeological culture that existed in China from approximately 1900 B.C.E. to 1500 BC.E. The culture was named after the site discovered at Erlitou in Yanshi, Henan. The culture was widely spread throughout Henan and Shanxi and later appeared in Shaanxi and Hubei. Chinese archaeologists generally identify the Erlitou culture as the site of the Xia dynasty, but there is no firm evidence, such as writing, to substantiate such a linkage.”
1,500 BCE - Present day - Uninterrupted Chinese history documented in writing.
*If the global flood occurred some time about 4000 years ago, it is refuted by Chinese history (much of which is documented and goes back 15,000 years). While there were many smaller and local floods, cultures in China continued to strive and were never wipe out.*
@@antzag6983 why would the person above need to name civilizations and articles?
@@therick363 Because there is only 4,000 years of actual record history of china this person is claiming 20,000 years which is a lie
@@antzag6983 so unless we have human records…doesn’t count?
Btw we have cave paintings older that 4000. So.z
Some world class bullshiting going on here😂😂
Explain…
People think they can decide the way they want it to be.. God is good and is giving us chance after chance !
I am a Christian, live in Australia and have a question. We have Koalas here in Australia and they have a very specific diet that being gum leaves (a tree that is native to Australia). 1 - How did the Kolas walk all the way from Mount Tendurek or where the ark ended up. Walking over oceans through harsh conditions which would have been a years long trek for these little guys?
2 - With the understanding that the trees they ate off are only native to Australia. What did they eat along the way?
I think the answer to your question is pretty obvious.
Sea levels were about 400 feet lower as the Flood caused the ice age. The koalas walked there or were helped by humans.
Yeah maybe koalas walked 20,000 kilometres? but what did they eat along the way?
@@lahaina4791 you did not address the diet question.
@@CarmenVeranda please explain.
God is good all the time.
Here's a question; if the withdrawal of the waters of The Flood, easily created the Grand Canyon, and with minor variations the soil or rock in general is the same or similar wherever you look at it on the planet.
How come we don't see a huge number of "Grand Canyon-like"" gorges or river valleys, all over the globe? Why are most of the river valleys on the globe, at ground level or only a small bit, higher or lower?
If the aborigine is over 50,000 years old, then how did they survived the great flood?