Ubik by Philip k. Dick - Gnostic Paranoia - AB+C 99

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ส.ค. 2024
  • In this episode we discussed 'Ubik' (1969) by Philip K. Dick, a piece of iconic science-fiction set in a world of psychic corporate espionage and dead relatives suspended in perpetual "halflife". Throughout the novel Gnostic and Platonic philosophy exude through perpetually inventive interpretations of advertising culture, psychotic mental states and satire of domestic mod cons. We talked about Dick's fixation on material culture as it appears in his other stories 'The Man in the High Castle' (1962) and 'Pay for the Printer' (1956).
    Edited by Matthew Lloyd Roberts.
    Support the show on Patreon to receive bonus content for every show: / about_buildings

ความคิดเห็น • 18

  • @jasonchicago7276
    @jasonchicago7276 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    This is brilliant. I read Ubik a few years back, and I absolutely loved it, but none of my friends were interested in reading it, so I didn't get to discuss it with anyone. So it's just lovely to hear such a smart conversation about it. I have no idea how the algorithm got me to you, but I'm glad it did.

    • @about_buildings
      @about_buildings  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      So glad you enjoyed the episode! You can find more discussion of science-fiction in our back catalogue, including Blade Runner, 2001 A Space Odyssey and Akira

  • @thomasmcgrath1355
    @thomasmcgrath1355 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Your Podcast is amazing. I’m sadly binge watching as I work away at my Masters. Your debates are spot on. Thank you!

  • @rezzer7918
    @rezzer7918 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Kings Arms Pub
    How COOL 😎

  • @ZakStandridge
    @ZakStandridge 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    cheers, mate

  • @iv7796
    @iv7796 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    10 more hours of this please

  • @jasonchicago7276
    @jasonchicago7276 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Do you imagine that Ubik could be made into a commercially viable film?

    • @about_buildings
      @about_buildings  ปีที่แล้ว +5

      it could work but you'd need to lean into the stylisation / tropiness and flattened affect. weirdly could be quite a good wes anderson film i think.

    • @Cyberfox63
      @Cyberfox63 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Only Christopher Nolan could do that

  • @ConanDuke
    @ConanDuke 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    25:00 William Gibson never once painted for us a "cool sci-fi location". All of his descriptions serve the purpose of elaborating how the technology works, and why it does what it does.

    • @about_buildings
      @about_buildings  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      We agree, for more of our thoughts check out our two-part series on Neuromancer: th-cam.com/video/lmLfkgR1wJ4/w-d-xo.htmlsi=xSV0xgKSdRrGJheO

  • @fjuvo
    @fjuvo ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Will you do some modern architects? Like BIG

  • @daves6685
    @daves6685 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    GREAT DEBATE AND TALK!!!!! THANK YOU!!!!!

  • @DJchrismiller1
    @DJchrismiller1 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I have no idea how you guys sit like that, and for and hour no less. I couldn't sit like that for even one minute.

    • @rezzer7918
      @rezzer7918 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Y.o.u.t.h.

  • @shellymarstersdon6268
    @shellymarstersdon6268 ปีที่แล้ว

    It really feels like Dick is trying to promote God and religion with this book. Am I missing something? Or is this just religious propoganda to promote the idea of faith?

    • @lifeisgoodskt
      @lifeisgoodskt 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Oh no. Not God. Noooop. No one smart can ever believe in anything but nothing mattering! Grow up child