Thanks to World of Warships for sponsoring this video. Join the raffle for a chance to win a custom USS Texas Xbox - wowsl.co/4cniBhO 🔶Patreon www.patreon.com/monsieurz/membership 🔴Merch us-of-z-shop.creator-spring.com/ 🔷Facebook facebook.com/people/Monsieur-Z/100086678611994/ 🟣Discord discord.gg/bsbxG9XFGc 🔶Reddit www.reddit.com/r/MrZ_Official/
The Chinook Wawa word for American is Boston so the New Englander origins checks out; at least for 19th Century Immigration in Washington State. 3/4 of my relatives immigrated to Washington from the Corn Belt and Quebec, roughly during WW1/Great Depression era. Maternal Grandmother grew up in London area and uprooted to Washington in the 60’s after marrying an American Army Accountant. :)
Stop thinking regional differences are exclusive to America; or a uniquely American phenomenon. It's not special and we're not impressed with it. You all speak English with barely any variety other than accents; again, like everywhere else in the world.
Here's how I count the 15 countries of America: 1. New Englanders 2. East Coastfolk 3. Southerners, Cajuns, Floridafolk and Creoles 4. Black Belters 5. Greater Appalachians 6. Rust Belters 7. Great Lakesfolk (North Country & Lower Midwest) 8. Upper Midwesterners 9. Greater Rockians/Old West Trailerites 10. Saintslanders (Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints) 11. Chicanos, Texans and other Hispanics 12. West Coastfolk 13. Mountain Westerners 14. Navajo, Ute & Hopi 15. Native Hawaiian diaspora
I love how you have to explain the American Empire every single time you make one of these videos. You should make an in-depth dive into the Empire vs a nation in one video and just link it before each video you do similar to this so you can just go “go watch this video for a full explanation”
It would be interesting to hear Z's additional input on that. In the meantime I would recommend Pax Tube and his video on why the American Empire is in decline.
Genuinely, it might be necessary. It's like, I can give you some required reading, and you'll be kinda lost during the video, or I can summarize the details for you, and you can at least be caught up to speed with everyone else. It's like this with most history subjects, sometimes you can't just drop into something without mentioning something else.
These three "nations" are located in, respectively, a large central triangle whose general borders are North Dakota, Texas, and Alabama, with a prong jutting into the Appalachians and a western appendage curving around into Mormon territory; the Pacific, much of the Southwest, and the East Coast from Maine to Virginia; and the three "swing" states of Iowa, Ohio, and Florida (one could arguably include Arizona, Wisconsin, Indiana, Michigan, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, and Georgia in this final group as well). Of course, the above is more or less an ideological snapshot of America in the year 2020, and is already a bit dated. Not to mention that there are stubborn enclaves within all of these regions. My family's Southern California household, otherwise deep within "Wokeistan," is rabidly devoted to "Magastan" (much to my chagrin).
@@jibtibh.9245 no but Virginia has certainly changed and is much more Mid-Atlantic nowadays than Southern. NoVA, Fredericksburg, RVA, and the 757 are integrated into the Northeast Regional Amtrak line these days. Even in my lifetime (I’m 31), Virginia has definitely transitioned away from The South and more into the Megalopolis. Hampton Roads will be the Southern terminus of the Megalopolis in no time
@@tiramiseratops I could say the same of Wokeistan. There are no real social justice issues anymore, just a bunch of grifters masquerading as activists
I’m from the Chicago area and now live in rural Minnesota. The real culture transition from Illinois to Minnesota occurs at about the Wisconsin River which runs through Madison. North of Madison, the geography shifts to more forestry, and the ethnicity transitions to more German/Scandinavian. South of it you have a more distinctly Cumbrian English ancestry descended from the Appalachian frontiersmen. Still a lot of German ancestry, but more Missouri Synod versus Lutheran.
Wisconsin South of Milwaukee has more in common with Northern Illinois than with the rest of the State. Milwaukee received a lot of immigration from up North, so it stands out from the areas directly South of the county.
Also live in rural MN and noticed that too. Grew up in the hills of Maryland, close to the mountains, but not in it. Very Catholic and family oriented over there with large German populations. The change there is very clear when you cross the Potomac and see the flat farms and cities on the other side of the state. Took me a while to acclimate to the MN nation .
@@Blaxton9this is bizarre to me. Is Western MD Catholic? Somehow this comment touches on both sides of my family…mom’s side is from rural Minnesota and wholly Scandinavian, Dad’s is Catholic from southern MD going back to the first settlers in the region. I had no idea western MD also had a Catholic background. Unfortunately I grew up thinking that area was stereotypically backwards…
After the election you should come back to this map and try to figure out how each country voted based on the vote counts. It would be hard to compile all the precise vote counts but it would be interesting to see a more in depth political view of these countries.
@@MonsieurDean pls fix pnw, eastern washington is more like idaho in culture, same with eastern oregon, we are separated by the cascades, on the west side of cascades its hippies, and on the east its cowboys and shit. PLEASE make eastern washington and eastern oregon separate to western.
Thank you! If your a Pole in America, your just as much an American as a descendent from the Mayflower. Germany and Russia ruled Poland for a hundred years and the Poles were always second class citizens. Not in America.
Not true and against the very founding fathers and stock of this country, I know it sucks and I know people don't like reality however race does have something to do with natio the root of nation is defined as a people of shared birth place , that is racial definition especially when written in the 1600s
@@Aristocles22 and ? Your point ? Magna Carta was written in the 1400s does it make the law of England anyless relevant? You seem to be ignorant of the importance of history.
Unfortunately, partly due to being put in half redneck borders, were less and less of a culture with each passing year. We need to reverse anglicizing or in 30 years the only French thing left here will be the surnames.
I've noticed that, while a decent amount of people from traditionally Protestant backgrounds are becoming Catholic, a shockingly high amount of people from traditionally Catholic backgrounds are becoming Evangelical Protestants, with Pentecostalism Non-denominationalism being the two most favored denominations. For example, a few years ago Brazil flipped from being a majority Catholic nation to a majority Pentecostal nation. I'm not sure why these deep rooted Catholics are so drawn to a charismatic deonomiation on the polar opposite of the Christian spectrum. It merits some looking into.
1. New Englanders 2. East Coastfolk 3. Southerners, Cajuns, Floridafolk and Creoles 4. Black Belters 5. Greater Appalachians 6. Rust Belters 7. Great Lakesfolk (North Country & Lower Midwest) 8. Upper Midwesterners 9. Greater Rockians/Old West Trailerites 10. Saintslanders (Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints) 11. Chicanos, Texans and other Hispanics 12. West Coastfolk 13. Mountain Westerners 14. Navajo, Ute & Hopi 15. Native Hawaiian diaspora
lol the young men in America are mostly brown these days. Mr. Z's focus on christian denominations also feels like he's describing the demographics of last century.
USA, Brazil, Russia, China and Persia are what I call 'Imperial Nations'. They are big countries made of several nations of similar cultures, but distinct enough. They are distinct, but prefer being the same country.
I’d call them “Super-National States” Because “Empire” implies a patron/client or ruler/vassal relationship between the involved nations-which you can *argue* for all (cough cough Russia), but all at least claim to disavow. But yeah, the idea that State and Nation ought to align is a fairly modern one, and I’d argue a (well-designed and properly functioning) cosmopolitan federal state can protect the interests of many nations simultaneously and ideally minimize the worst aspects of nationalism, replacing them with a “nationalism” for the common goals of all.
@@IONATVS I like your term, but I think that Empire still fits, because even though the nations don't have a suzerain-vassal relationship inside the main culture group, there is still a force from the state trying to mush together or unify the mindset of their peoples, either by forcing some ideals from a place, or making they share their traits between one another.
Yes almost true except for the fact that China is an ethnostate. Sure, its minority populations number in the millions but Han Chinese are far over 90% of the population, compared to Brazil's 50/50 mix of white and mixed, or America's 55% whites, 13% blacks and the rest latino.
@@exenderlloyd7750 Northern and Southern Han have pretty significant cultural and linguistic differences, and the Tibetan & Uighur peoples are local majorities that very much DO NOT want to be ruled from Beijing. Manchuria and Inner Mongolia have been pretty thoroughly assimilated, but very much in the way Empires always have: by force. Absolutely fair to call it an Empire, even though it likes to think of itself as a nation-state.
As someone raised in Utah, I think the Mormon nation is actually a little bigger than what’s on the map, but I guess it’s fair to say it’s more of a gradual gradient away from where the video border is. Most people don’t realize how many cities and towns the Mormons settled when they fled west. Look up “the Mormon corridor”, it’s insane. Like Las Vegas was initially settled by Mormons lol but then during the gold and other mining rushes other populations moved in.
I would argue that Florida should be counted separately from the Southern identity as they have very different historys from the rest of the south. Florida was only settled beginning in 1920s most of its population coming from the north especially those of more conservative backgrounds, this combined with Caribbean immigrantion, especially from Cuba has led to Florida having a unique culture that is only now beginning to collase. If i had describe Florida culture it would be laid back, urban, and agnostic, while being highly conservative fiscally and socially progressive. With Spanish somtimes being more important than English to the point it is influencing the way Floridians speak English.
This is only true of everything south of the panhandle, Pensacola to Jacksonville is very much is very much part of the south from the politics to the accent to architectural style and age of buildings.
@@craigbenz4835 I live in North Florida and I would agree the panhandle especially is still very southern, this has more to do with history and geography. In Jax for example the city is slowly turning into something more like Tampa as time goes on. In fact north Florida is like parts of Eastern Germany before the world wars, in that that the rural population was primarily polish but in the urban city's it was german. Most Southerns don't live in city's and the few city's in the south developed to export agricultural products. This, the southern parts of Florida will as time goes on and the state culture fully emerges the Southern population will continue to shrink. As for politics I think Florida position on social issues has more to with how far Dems have pushed the social Issues and the still strong but dying evangelical wing of the Republican party, most people vote Republican in the state to avoid taxes, which is the main reason people from up north retired or moved to Florida.
In regards to Spanish, the only place where Spanish might be used instead of English is Miami, in areas where the hispanic population outnumbers the English speaking population. The Spanish influenced accent you're describing is often called the Miami accent for this reason. Not common in the rest of Florida. Now, they say that the more north you go, the more southern it gets, but a more correct correlation would be urban vs rural, as historic southern influence still lingers in rural areas of central Florida, at the very least as far down as Okeechobee.
Always thought of myself as New Englander, but that Metropolitan description has shaken that a bit. I always tell folks from abroad I'm from Massachusetts-Not-Boston. Far enough away to be different, close enough to be taxed.
Well remember that just like Europe, having a background in one of these nations doesn't mean you're restricted to these areas, or that you don't have a background made up of multiple nations. You can be an ancestrally French man born in Britain, or an Italian with some Austrian ancestry, sometimes the nations overlap and mix, but we can still recognize that they're there.
@@MonsieurDean Well said. My home is conservative, relative to the rest of the area, and for most of my neighbors, I'm in a different Overton Time Zone. I still get along with everyone here, laugh at most of the same jokes, and sneer at similar outsiders (Conneticut & NYC metro).
For me the five most culturally distinct U.S. cities are Chicago, Detroit, Philadelphia, NYC, and Boston. They are located within the German, Italian, and Irish ethnic belts. However, the first two cities transcend their "German-ness."
These aren’t countries but concentrated cultures mixing with surrounding cultures. It’s not unique to America, but it’s only happening now because America is a fairly new country (especially in its united state) and we’re so big. France, Germany, Spain, and many other nations used to be a collection of many smaller nations and identities before unifying into what they are today. But when they originally unified, they were still a collection of different cultures until over time, they all formed one distinct identity. America can do the same although it will be much harder and take a lot longer given our size.
He didn’t say they were countries. He said they were nations. And they have been distinct nations for hundreds of years. America is also not a young nation anymore.
@ Most haven’t been here that long. Our oldest colonies have only been around since the 1600s and those are the oldest American cultures unless you count the natives, but respectfully, they don’t really count as part of American culture. Then you have cultures out west that only started to have identities a hundred years ago. A few centuries ago may sound old but when you take into account that there are universities in England dating back to the 13th century, a city in Greece that dates back to 5000 BCE, and world wonders that are as old as human history itself, America is still young.
@@ADMusic1999 America as a cultural touchstone is older than almost any other still around in the West today. It’s older than the cultural conception of “German-ness” for example. The fact that Oxford and Cambridge are old is meaningless when the “British nation” as a concept is barely 300 years old. Same goes for “Italian.” In fact, “Italian American” predates Italian Nationalism. Same goes for “German American.” Europeans vastly overestimate age of their national identities. Nobody in the 1300s identified as “culturally French,” for example. “Spain” as a kingdom only predates the American colonies by about a century. And “Spaniard” as a cultural force is younger than “Massachusetts.”
@@carsonianthegreat4672 I alluded to the Puritans without spelling it out when I said “our oldest colonies have only been around since the 1600s.” That’s only 400 years ago which isn’t that long ago in the span of human history and the cultures that exist around the world. When we talk about cultures, they are distinct from the national identity which I think you know that as you pointed out several cultures in America that are separate from the national identity of generic “American” (if such a term exists). So while the national identity of France may be relatively new, the distinct cultures within the French nation are much older dating back centuries. Same with the cultures that inhabit England, Spain, Italy, etc. Juxtapose that with the cultures that inhabit America and you see the difference. We don’t have cultures here going back that far because we didn’t get here until the 17th century. And even then, there was no unique American identity really until the Civil War. Until that point, people identified more as New Yorkers or Georgians than as Americans. Even now, it’s hard to pinpoint one true American culture as we’re all so different and diverse.
As a lifelong Californian, Calling any part of California “Texan” or “neo-Texan” is way off. California has 6-10 distinct cultures and regions. Central coast and Jefferson aren’t the same as San Diego, the desert & LA, central valley and the sierras is not the same as the Bay Area. California is its own thing but definitely not Texan or neo-texan lol
I can agree. Being a 4th generation Californian(before that founders of Boston) I can say that California has many sub groups. Almost certainly it's because there are so many biomes. Our family lives in basically all of them. I grew up ranching, others farming. Lived in cities and small towns, coast and interior. I grew up hunting and fishing in the huge Sierra mountains spanning the entire California east. Let me tell you, customs in the mountains are completely different from our cities. Simplistically, one you carry a gun, one you don't. Sitting around a campfire once an old cowboy told me, "As long as you don't sh*t on my front porch I don't care what you do." Ranch life is different from those, but closer to mountain. The desert people are their own thing too. Jefferson State and Lost Coast people are very different. Mountain range separations make a big difference.
You can really gauge it by how much people in one part of California dislike people from another part moving there. In the central Sierras people are generally fine with folks from the valley, up north, or a distance south in the range, but really hate it when folks from the bay area or LA move in.
Lumping Californians all together is already absurd becuase Californians don't even like each other. Like people from Slovang are going to see people from Los Angeles as different people.
You clearly did not see the map to see where he called Neo-Texas. And it is implied Neo-Texas only refers to the Latino area of Texas and Latino was the overcompassing term he chose for the entire zone...
Regions yes, but the internal integration of language, interaction, economic interdependence and shared laws make America and Canada stand alone countries, America is just federal while Canada is confederal. More power to regions sure, but America i still believe is united.
@@23uncbball How would you feel about more Localism and Decentralization and more diverse economic policies implemented by each state? Example: Some states are more market oriented and others are more government intervention focused.
Not even touching on how much language and dialect has diverged in the US, a population speaking the same language, practicing the same laws, and participating in the same economy does not a nation make, once again this is an empire. In Rome you speak Latin, follow Roman law, and pay with government issued denarius, regardless of if you're a Gaul, a Syrian, or a Greek.
@@PhyllisLane-xj5uf SoCal is all business and bad driver stereotype, NorCal is chill as heck, central Cal is where Sacramento, the capital of California exists and is rare to mention when there is LA, San Francisco, Orange Country, San Diego, and to joke, the colony of the Philippines the west coast, the colony of china, Irvine or Anaheim, and the colony of mexico, California, U.S.
I’m Black. I’m from Philadelphia and I noticed that Black people who live in other major US cities function very similarly. I think this is a result of the treatment Black people had to deal with wherever they moved to.
While I agree, I also think I have more in common with a native Hawaiian or white Californian culturally than I do with black people from New England or the South.
Or it could be the fact that most of the population of black Americans are from the South during the Jim crow era, the majority of the black population in the South, moved North, taking their culture and dialects with them, leading to a mono culture. If you read northern black letters to each other during this time. You would see the northern black americans had a very different culture then the southern based black culture of today.
For the most part blacks have a common origin in the south and took their general mannerisms with them when they left for better opportunities outside that region. Nowadays social media seems to be the great unifying thing between black communities. They all consume the same media and follow the same trends and influencers, so there isn't really much real isolation between them at all.
No. I’m from California. We have completely different cultures in different regions. Life is slower paced on Atlantic Ocean and we’re basically in Mexico/ Japan influenced place
As a missourian now living in alaska, i am pleased to see that missouri is properly split between its four main parts. The distiction between st louis area, little dixie, and the ozarks is uncanny. Northern missouri i just call iowa.
I've recently moved to Utah from Ohio, and honestly the cultural differences are massive (and no, not just because of Mormonism lol). I could talk for hours about all the differences, but it's amazing because I always felt like a complete outcast in Ohio, whereas here I fit right in very naturally.
I'm Argentina but this year I've had the opportunity to visit and spend some time in Atlanta, North Carolina, Tennessee, New Jersey, and New York and honestly, the differences I saw between all those regions track quite well with what the video shows. Atlanta is basically the spiritual capital of African Americans, what with MLK's house and pretty much everyone being black and whatnot, North Carolina is very distinct from Tennessee and NY/NJ but you can still see both old Anglo elements but also the "Metropolitan" pockets of Italian and Hispanic surnames especially in places like Raleigh. The Appalachians are functionally their own country, I had the opportunity to visit very "backwoods" parts of the state and smaller towns, and while you can tell the rural areas are worse-for-wear I did also see a very distinct identity that doesn't show any signs of being replaced any time soon. New York and New Jersey are basically one big city-state with just about every race and ethnicity you can imagine, but especially in New Jersey you could tell the particular Ellis Island elements had a lot of presence, save in areas like, say, Harlem or Palisades Park's Koreatown. Another kinda tangential note but I could also notice a specific white American "look", like especially those of Anglo-Germanic descent, but also some Italians have specific phenotypic characteristics that make them look different from whites from Europe or Argentina, can't quite put my finger on it but they're very square-faced. Also, another tangent, I can see the African-American nation becoming some sort of Jewish/Gypsy-like minority, primarily urban and culturally influential but also very "closed" and inward-looking, probably because of the "one drop rule" cultural idea Americans have, I remember meeting this girl in Tennessee who, while you could tell she was mixed, would've been considered white in Argentina and probably parts of Europe to, but according to herself and all her friends she was black because her grandmother was black.
Great video. They don't teach this in schools. I am an army veteran. When I went to basic training I have the chance to see these differences because the army mixes people from all over the US. Even so, we were able to work together. Thank you.
Most Americans live in what could be considered "megapolises," that is, closely located cities spread over multiple states that are tightly integrated due to continuous transportation, residential, and commercial services. These areas have more unified identities not just within themselves but also with other ultra-urbanized locations. This zone-culture subsumes the majority of the black nation acting as a protective sheath ending at Alabama border. The FUN thing about this is that these areas are growing along the lines of highways and are only halted by mountains and swamps.
As a Mormon (or rather a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints), I videos like this fill my heart with the pride of Deseret (despite the fact that I've lived almost none of my life in Utah).
Texas west of the piney woods is far more close with Appalachia than the Deep South. Texas was basically a colony of Tennessee in the 1820s, our founders are mostly from there and our character and values are much closer. Mississippi feels foreign to us here, Appalachia feels like home. At the end of the day though, Texas is Texas. I know we say it all the time but it’s true. Hispanics are statistically the most prideful of Texan identity, separating us is inaccurate.
There's a real cultural difference between American Hispanics (what dean calls "neo-texans") and Tejanos. Tejanos have been here in Texas (Tejas) since the days of the Viceroyalty of New Spain, earlier in fact on the native side of their lineage. Texians (aka Anglos of various cultural persuasions) & Tejanos are two distinct nations who formed the Texan state together in alliance against the tyranny of the Centralist Republic of Mexico under Santa Anna who, among other political figures, shredded the 1824 Constitution of the First Mexican Republic. Some Tejanos get MAD if you dare to call them hispanic. They are specifically and thoroughly Texan.
@@CullodenCowboy I was with you until you said Hispanic. We fought two wars against Mexicans and kicked 75% of them out. Mexicans are not Texan. They are not welcome. They have to go back.
You should do a video on Mormon colonization. The Mormon corridor stretching from Mexico all the way into Canada has left a mark even where the Mormons abandoned
18:16 A "relatively recent nation"???? You do realize that the Spanish Empire was there LOOOONG before the area was captured by anglo Americans, right? The vast majority of Latinos in those areas are NOT immigrants, they're ancestors were there hundreds of years before the USA was even born. Even so, you can't define the are as being a Latino area, as it hovers closer to a 50/50 split between Latinos and anglos, and despite all the bullshit you see on the news, we all get along pretty well and are frequently intermarried. That's why the US southwest is generally opposed to a lot of racist policies coming out of conservative circles.
I believe the Black, both African American and Immigrant Black, influence in many of these regions has been underestimated. You have 4 million Black folk in Texas, 3.7 million in Florida, 3.5 million in Georgia & New York, i can go on. Yet, Black folk are only mentioned in the Black Belt region.
It’s strange. Afro Americans alone were the majority in South Carolina, Mississippi, and Louisiana. 50 million Afro Americans with 97% being having strong ties to the southern states due to the slave trader- more Afro Americans than their are Canadians, Australian, Spain etc… There’s a strong white washing of the histories of the Americas(primarily US and Brazil).
I think you exaggerate by calling these regional differences nations, If you compare us to a country where the different regions actually are seperate Nations like India or Nigeria it becomes pretty clear we are one Nation, I made freinds from California, Texas, and Washington while living in Madison Wisconsin this dosn't happen in India except for in Mumbai and Delhi but cross regional freindships like this are common in every corner of the US beacuse we are one Nation
As a Missourian, the state is definitely split between multiple regions and cultures - Ozark/Appalachia in the south, St. Louis/Midwest in the east, Heartland in the north, but Kansas City is not Southern, as it appears on the map, or at least that has not been my experience of the city. What is your reasoning? KC is split down the middle between MO and KS and split top from bottom by the Missouri River. North of the river leans Heartland and south of the river, though still essentially Heartland, has some Ozark/Appalachia, though only on the Missouri side. The KS side is all Heartland with maybe with a touch of Texas/OK.
I think French Louisiana is definitely a nation. We might act like general Southerners a lot, but when push comes to shove we are ethnically and culturally distinct. (Even if its unfortunately being eroded as we speak)
Northern Wyoming has a sizable population of people descended from Polish coal miners that arrived in the 1900’s. Even today, there’s a ton of people in Sheridan with last names like Jolovich (Americanized “Jałowicher” I think,) Legerski, Kawulok, etc. Some people there even still speak the language.
America being an Empire is indeed true for different reasons including the whole 'anyone can be American purely from believing in an ideal or two' thing.
@@CaptainAmerica001 There is no "American continent" just like there is no Euro-African or Afro-Asiatic continent. Being able to walk from Egypt to Jordan doesn't make it one continent.
@@CaptainAmerica001 "America is one continent" was an imperial project that is only still believed by countries in Latin Europe and some of their former colonies in Latin America. The Americas are, geologically, 3 continents. If you want to tell me that Europe and Asia are one continent I'm with you but Canada and Uruguay are not on the same continent.
@@MonsieurDean I think what you're missing is how New England works as a larger region. No one is trying to convince you that the White Mountains region is the same as Metro Boston. That's absurd. But politically and historically the White Mountains are tied to Boston and the New England economy in a way that is irrelevant to anything that goes on West of Champlain. There's so much regional history you clearly aren't aware of that is distorting your view of how the northeast works. It's kind of funny how in your assessment and divisions you have done the American thing and divided land based on terrain and aesthetic without taking into consideration local history and family ties. And no, it's not one uniform region, it's probably more like thirty something regions that all differ in economy, culture, and geography. I bet you think Bostonians go leaf peeping in the Berkshires. Does the word Kanc mean anything to you? Ever heard of the Big E? Are you even at all aware of Old Home days or or the strong tradition of fairs in New England? There's so much that distinguishes New England that you consistently ignore in your videos, and it comes across as you diminishing the people of the United States to aesthetics often caused by climate and economies often caused by federal policies or geography. Even worse is that you sometimes take the racist route and use haplogroups as reason to divide regions. I urge you to go out and talk to strangers. Travel and explore. Really learn the people of the world and what makes them tick. It's so much more amazing than you seem to acknowledge.
I’m from the Netherland, and you can become Dutch, just like you can become American. And people that choose to become Dutch are attracted to the culture. Americans will have different cultures in their country, like all other countries have. But they are all Americans, with some very specific American traits.
You can’t become Dutch like you can become American. All the countries in the Americas have birthright citizenship-born in the USA or Brazil or Canada that person is an automatic citizen. Europes rules are mostly about blood ties to the country (jus soli with restrictions).
Nonsense. I can be born in a barn in China but it doesn’t make me a Chinese horse. Likewise, just because some Moroccan, Turkish, African, or Ukrainian, lives in NL and has NL pass doesn’t make them actually Dutch.
For the build up to this video being about utahism, I’m surprised it had the shortest airplay lol 😅 I’m glad you mentioned the danish settlers all the same that usually gets overlooked
There is significant cultural variation between Tex-Mex Latinos and those in California. The surrounding cultural influences in Texas vs California couldn't be more different. SoCal and the San Joaquin/Sacramento Valleys have a large presence of multiple Asian peoples, plus So Cal Latinos likely include a greater percentage of Non-Mexican Latinos from Central and South America. Texas is culturally and religiously conservative for the most part while California is just the opposite.
I find it so strange how Brazil is almost the same size physically and population-wise to the USA, but at the same time is incredibly more homogeneous. Although we do have our differences, everyone in Brazil considers themselves Brazilian first and someone from the Amazon region can relate to someone from Rio, and someone from São Paulo can relate to someone from the Northeast
I love these American Nations videos. This provides much needed cultural context and nuance that is necessary to understand why we don't/can't always get along.
Some new ones about your analysis of the Heartlander Volk. The story of my people doesn't only come from the Volga region but also the Black Sea region and the German settlements there. What also you forgot to mention, despite a large Lutheran population amongst the Germans from Russia population it was roughly divided in half between Catholic and Lutheran, with a lean slightly towards the Catholic religious side like my family. Also us Germans from Russia tend to be on the swarthier side because most of our extraction originally came from the Alpine German population in the southern German states such as Bavaria with my family. So often Germans from the Great Lakes will have lighter phenotypes than the German population on the Great Plains. Also because our population received persecution within Russia, we were more hearty add withstanding persecution during the first and second world war in America, so many of our people refuse to Anglicize properly by maintaining our surnames in the original German and cap German as many of our household languages up until the boomer generation where that generation destroyed a lot of traditional culture they also destroyed our ethnic distinction and refused to carry on the German tradition. Even today with our dialect of English that we speak in the Great Plains if you know how to look you can see the German influence upon the English spoken within the area. An elite cadre of our population in Gen Z are even re-adding or identity as Germans again above being Americans. Even I being in the military will always call myself German and/or Bavarian and just use American as a nationality term. I have also met a lot of these German-Americans in the armed forces starting to re-identify with their German ethnic identity over a broader American identity.
I have lived in America all my life but I consider myself Russian. I think that more people should identify with their ancestors and traditional culture rather than with their citizenship status of a government that has dubious representation of interests. I think that ethnic identity is more important than citizenship or government identity.
If we’re being honest, the United States of America is equivalent to the European Union each state is basically it’s own country and we’ve all just agreed to work together for common goals
Although the naming convention can be debated, I think the “Montanans” are a good way of understanding the cultural context of the Rocky Mountain region. From my personal experience (I live in Oregon) it helps to explain the differences in political ideology between western and eastern Oregon. The developed urban regions such as the Portland metro area and the I-5 corridor tend to be more liberal and secular, while the more rural eastern region (as well as pockets in southern Oregon or parts of the Willamette Valley) tend to be more conservative and religious.
As someone from the border area of the montanan/western nations in WA, i do think the border needs to be redrawn along the cascades instead of the columbia river, or at least there shoukd be a subregion of either one that is west of the columbia/east of the cascades representing an area with a large hispanic protestant population
The Arizona portion of the Southern Nation should be split into the SoCal and Mormon/Utah regions. They are both much more fitting, especially historically
Can you do a video on the uk riots as a Brit I feel we are having very similar issues with America on identity and why all the cultures are clashing. Whether this will happen in the US as well would love to see a scenario about it.
Ohh trust me once trump gets arrested which he will because of the lawfare in the country shits gonna go down jan6th on steroids idk im staying out of it but yea 2024 election gonna suck both ways
@@MonsieurDean thank you the only way we can save ourselves is having the canzuk union cooperation with the US especially Trump being very pro Anglo sphere
@@josephmaycock9the difference is and sad reality is... the us is largely split in 2, the difference is one section is contained to large cities and the other controls the rest of the us. Just look at us voting by counties. Most of the us is red id say 90% is. The blue sections are completely surrounded. The issue there is, the red sections control all the oil, all the farming, all the resources. In a "Civil war" type situation the war would be won by team red simply because they have the resources, not to mention red areas typically work together and have a greater sense of community, they also have the vast majority of the weapons. Team blue might have the numbers but they don't have the community aspect and they dont have resources. It's hard to win anything when you're not united and try to strike up different factions. I don't think it'd take long for team red to win. All they have to do is refuse to send resources to the cities and it's gg well played... they'd have to rely heavily on imports from other countries IF they could strike up some form of diplomacy with them and even then they'd have to negotiate those terms almost instantly because if you have no food you can't survive for very long. With a collapsed economy and 0 resources there's nothing to trade for, so who would bail them out? I hear this "American Civil war" thrown around by people who typically come from large cities and are not truly aware of the totality of the power of the red areas. There wouldn't be one, cut off the supply chain and it's over within a month. It's easy to hold major choke points that all major cities have and just starve people out. The in fighting within the city is their biggest weakness and they'll take themselves out while red areas would work together and continue on with life. Just look at the criminal records for large cities vs rural communities. Once there's no food on the shelves the gangs will be kicking in doors and stealing from their own team lol. That's why it's impossible for one side to win. Culture and resources. That's just on a civilian level, I think if the military split it'd be even more lopsided, I just look at the kids today and see a large number of one team not being pro military and the other team being the ones who are enlisting. As far as the uk goes idk, whoever controls the resources will win. Sadly I think yall are going the wrong direction and the team that'll win is the radical anti-uk population. Your gov wants it that way for some reason.
15 nations you say? Combine two of them into one and we can return to the Betsy Ross Flag. 😎👍 P.S. No dividing up Pennsylvania, in fact it should expand. Localism>>>Nationalism>>>Globalism
It pains me that so many in the New World fail to see the futility of the "Propositional" Nation. A nation is not a checklist of values, it is a folk, a tribe, a clan, a tradition, not some stupid cringe dot point on a notepad. Case and point I wholly reject this stupid and cringe idea of ever being "Australian" no, no I'm not "Australian", and I was never asked if I wanted to be Australian, so be Australian I shall not. What I am, what no ruling class can ever rob from me, is New South Welsh. We are the true men and women of New South Wales. Reject the stupid and cringe Australianisms of our Canberran ruling class. Embrace your true selves as New South Welshmen, and Welshwomen. This is why I refuse to vote for the cringe platitudes of One Nation. Because we are not "One Nation" and we never will be. What we need here is something like a New South Welsh Secession party to secede out of this crusty bunghole island. Or New South Welsh First Union Party.
@@somehowstillhere8766 The idea of a single federated Australian Commonwealth only made sense due to the shear homogeneity of the population up until about the 1970's and to a a degree our ruling class must have known this because following the 1967 Referendum to incorporate remote Aboriginal communities under the Races Power of the Constitution, 1967 marks a significant demarcation point between the Australia that had been growing organically since Federation and a much more top-down prescriptive version to try and "Wokify" the idea of being Australian to a hippy boomer liberal audience. This fact has only become more and more noticeable with time and in my view can't continue to be brushed under the rug anymore. While we may once have been "Aussies" the reality is we really aren't anymore. We've grown into something else, something more transcendent and real. That being New South Welsh.
@@Peak_Aussieman same here in the US. non-European immigration after 1965 and increasingly pushing the "nation of immigrants" idea transformed the concept of American to be meaningless. More and more race is the most coherent way to define people because it is something real versus malleable ideas.
@@somehowstillhere8766 True, compound this by the abolition of the Immigration Restriction Act and due to Australia's small population which had become accustomed to on-demand contraception a few years prior, and the stage was set for a serving of one dead civilisation down under. What are we? What does "being Australian" mean today? It means being a drunken hoon waiting for his next Centrelink money so he can spend it all on grog and cheap Thai massages. Another reason to grow up and be New South Welsh instead. Be New South Welsh instead. It's better that way.
Why regionalism? What does a sydney-sider have to do with someone from lithgow or mudgee, let alone broken hill? Are the people from tweed heads and the gold coast all that different? What matters is shared British ancestry and tradition. Lines drawn on a map only mean so much, and state borders can change at the drop of a hat. Also why bother with secession when NSW's biggest city is becoming a Chinese/Indian shithole anyway?
*_ADOS (American Descendants of Slaves) are a unique and distinct ethnic group._* They are a mixture of various ethnic groups from West Africa and Europe. Slavery was so profound that it even changed the genetics of an entire people, revealing one way many ways they were exploited. Because of the horrors of slavery, every single enslaved African girl and women was violated, those men passed their European ancestry to their enslaved children. This resulted in African Americans having paternal European lineage and maternal African lineage.
I am a huge nerd for anthropology, geopolitics, theology and cultural history and I just have to tell how amazing this video was. I was nerding out describing it to my roommate. The pictures you included to show the general ethnic and racial heritage of each region *chef's kiss*. It was well structured, well paced, well narrated, engaging. Just can't tell you how much I enjoyed your video. Time to go through your whole video list
I am a Russian immigrant, brought to the US by parents when I was 4 years, and I have lived here all my life. Now I am 26, and this is the first time I've ever heard of such nuances. I am surprised at how little I know about this country. Very informative video.
What he calls Midwestern I would call Great Lakes, and what he calls Ohioan I would call Midwestern. I tend to think of Ohio or Indiana more when I hear people talk about Midwestern culture than Northern New York or Michigan.
There was one thing he said about the South that puzzles me, though. How are the values of "small government" and "self-sufficiency" socially conservative? Given their anti-authoritarian basis, wouldn't most people call them socially liberal?
@@Reubentheimitator6572 I would not use those terms. I think when most people say "socially conservative," they're thinking of old-fashioned attitudes about sex, religion, and similar things. To me, those aren't social issues, but cultural issues. I think of social conservatism as "rich white men maintain their hold on power," which is something to which I'd think anyone who wasn't rich would object - at least in theory. I realize of course, that social issues, as I've defined them above, bleed into both economic issues and cultural issues. But I think it's a tragedy that so many conservative Americans wind up favoring social conservatism because they think it will lead to cultural conservatism, or even that they think the two are one and the same, when that often isn't the case.
Missed the culture/countries don’t stop at the USA land boarders - the arcadians to Louisiana, the dakotas I to Canada, the Quebecois into New England, the Third Coast (Great Lakes) into Ontario, SW USA into Mexico, Baja California into Mexico, British Columbia into PNW. 📍 Also missed the territories: Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico, Guam, Samoa, etc. 📍 Native American Indians (Canada, USA, Mexico) tribal influences - Iroquois Confederacy, etc.
How people identify themselves is completely subjective, with america their is a common culture and language, and a marginal desire for succession; why would a people with all that in common, break apart over religious or ethnic that those people don't even divide themselves by?
Monsieur Z is not talking about secession, just that American is an Imperial/Federal identity and local identity (at least in the past was more prominent) Sadly Globalization and Cosmopolitanism has made things more homogeneous, but local cultures still exist, you just got to find it. I'm a Localist, but reject secession.
On the topic of New England it’s really not a minor bleed over into Massachusetts I feel New England starts in Massachusetts it’s the center of the New England identity while as a mass hole myself I share way more experiences with people in Maine new Hampshire Vermont Rhode Island and Connecticut then anywhere else in the us
This is probably the number one reason the national political parties need to be broken up. It's literally impossible for the national political parties to represent everyone, or even a majority, heck even a plurality.
The south was not Baptist and Rural (at least in modern terms) before the civil war. The south was actually very wealthy. Following the civil war, it all fell into poverty, and didn’t even become republican until the 70s when it started dropping its racism.
I would change 2 minor things about this map: - The Finnish subregion (Copper Country) around the superior should be considered its own distinct area,perhaps since it's more like Scandamerica than the Midwest but more freedealing. - The border between Montanans & Westerners should be redrawn along the Cascades than the Columbia River, or at least make a subregion that is west of the Columbia but East of the Cascades
Great work! I would love to see a massive demographic survey of cultural and political values broken down by county. I wonder what ethnic and national boundaries would emerge.
The southeastern coast of Florida including Miami was settled by people from New England and New York beginning in the 1870s, and they have been migrating there ever since. While it's famous today for having a lot of Spanish speakers especially from Cuba, it's culturally more like NYC to the point that it gets called 6th borough and most of the rest of Florida considers it not part of the real South.
Also worth noting the reason the German settlers are so different from one another is also because they came from different German speaking countries. It wasn't until the mid to late 19th century these different countries would merge together to become Germany.
Germany was governmentaly divided into different states, but was considered a nation since at least the 1100's. The Holy Roman Emporer was also usually King of the Romans (any Imperial citizen) or King of Germany.
Even as late as the 1940's in Frankenmuth, Michigan the locals would talk to grandpa, whose family was from Prussia, but not grandma whose family was from Bavaria.
I was about to get all "them's fighting words" when you described New Englanders as being influenced by Anglo-Canadians across the border, then I realized you meant Quebec, not the Canadian rust belt.
Being from Orlando originally with a Nicaraguan Father who grew up in Miami, I feel Central Florida and Metro Miami have a lot in common with the Metropolitan Nation, after all, both regions wete primarily built by people from the Metropolitan region originally
The only difference is that Metro Miami feels more like a blend between the Metropolitan Nation and Latin America under a Cuban influence, whereas Southwest Florida feels like a blend between the Metropolitan Nation and the various Midwestern nations, and Central Florida a blend between the Metropolitan, Southern White, and African-American nations
I’d say you can probably break the south between North Carolina/Virginia (it feels more suburbanized and has a distinctly more secular feeling as opposed to the rest of the Piedmont lowland areas, you can also note this in election maps where it is basically a border between the urbanized North East and South) and South Carolina along with the remainder of the south.
Virginia is still mostly Southern in identity but her close proximity to the large population of the DC suburbs (NoVA) swing her election map much closer to the center than it would otherwise be.
I have to make sure because maybe I’m just seeing it wrong, you made sure to include south-eastern Idaho into Deseret? I would much sooner call someone from Pocatello my brother than someone from St. George
I would say these are more accurately describes ethnicities rather than full on nations. If These were full on nations they would not be able stand on their own two feet.
I’m from Texas (live in Louisiana now though) and honestly Texas could be its own nation. Not just because it was its own for a while but it has its own sort of settlement patterns and culture that stems from the deep south, Appalachia, and later Germans. My ancestors have been in Texas since around the civil war. My dad’s ancestors were Appalachians, primarily Pennsylvania German and Scots-Irish with some Anglo, Dutch and maybe some native mixture, and my mom’s side is more deep southern from Georgia originally, primarily Anglo, Welsh, Highland Scottish and later Texan German. Dad’s ancestor fought for Tennessee’s union regiment and mom’s for Georgia’s confederate militia. Ultimately what I’m yapping about is Texas on its own is a sort of synthesis between Appalachia, the Deep South, and the German migrations. I love content like this, it’s a very interesting way to view America as different nations. It makes a lot of sense really. It’s like our own newer ethnogeneses, similar to our ancestors as well as cousins in Europe had centuries ago.
Also it’s historically Latino Tejano population before German migration to the state. That would be interesting. Eva Longoria has ties to Texas since 1600’s.
Dude. You and the Canadians together are a more coherent nation than Spain. "15 countries"... sure... 0:38 comparably to other nations, yes it is. Do you think a foreigner can distinguish between Georgian and a New-Yorker? Heck, you many times can't know the difference. They are so vague you literally categorize people by skin color.
I think the fact that foreigners can't tell Americans apart has more to do with how America projects itself as one nation on the world stage. But just because they see us as one blob doesn't mean we are. Even if cosmopolitanism and Globalization had made everything more homogeneous. Local cultures still persist, you just got to look for it.
@@AmericanImperium1776 If anything, the world knows about Americans much more than any other countries. I'm from the Middle East and I see way more Americans on the internet than people from my country.
@@user-sh3cf7kd6e Yeah, they know about America more than probably even their own countries, but they don't really know the individual states and what makes each one tick. They just know from the movies, TV Shows, music, and video games we put out. Which honestly I don't really think is a good view into genuine American culture. It's just "pop culture" which has more of a global feel.
Having these differences, is what makes us a World Power, imo.. Silicon valley produces Tech.. Texas and The flatlands of MT can produce oil.. (and other places) Economic zone in the Northeast.. Losts of farmland/Lumber in PNW.. Makes us very hard to de stable..
Thanks to World of Warships for sponsoring this video. Join the raffle for a chance to win a custom USS Texas Xbox - wowsl.co/4cniBhO
🔶Patreon www.patreon.com/monsieurz/membership
🔴Merch us-of-z-shop.creator-spring.com/
🔷Facebook facebook.com/people/Monsieur-Z/100086678611994/
🟣Discord discord.gg/bsbxG9XFGc
🔶Reddit www.reddit.com/r/MrZ_Official/
The Chinook Wawa word for American is Boston so the New Englander origins checks out; at least for 19th Century Immigration in Washington State.
3/4 of my relatives immigrated to Washington from the Corn Belt and Quebec, roughly during WW1/Great Depression era.
Maternal Grandmother grew up in London area and uprooted to Washington in the 60’s after marrying an American Army Accountant. :)
Stop thinking regional differences are exclusive to America; or a uniquely American phenomenon. It's not special and we're not impressed with it. You all speak English with barely any variety other than accents; again, like everywhere else in the world.
Here's how I count the 15 countries of America:
1. New Englanders
2. East Coastfolk
3. Southerners, Cajuns, Floridafolk and Creoles
4. Black Belters
5. Greater Appalachians
6. Rust Belters
7. Great Lakesfolk (North Country & Lower Midwest)
8. Upper Midwesterners
9. Greater Rockians/Old West Trailerites
10. Saintslanders (Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints)
11. Chicanos, Texans and other Hispanics
12. West Coastfolk
13. Mountain Westerners
14. Navajo, Ute & Hopi
15. Native Hawaiian diaspora
@@Dogman1993 Z could be starting a series and talking about all the different countries?
Idk, let’s see how things go. :)
I only exist in Leavemealoneland
I love how you have to explain the American Empire every single time you make one of these videos.
You should make an in-depth dive into the Empire vs a nation in one video and just link it before each video you do similar to this so you can just go “go watch this video for a full explanation”
I concur. It would make things easier. 👍
It would be interesting to hear Z's additional input on that. In the meantime I would recommend Pax Tube and his video on why the American Empire is in decline.
Genuinely, it might be necessary. It's like, I can give you some required reading, and you'll be kinda lost during the video, or I can summarize the details for you, and you can at least be caught up to speed with everyone else. It's like this with most history subjects, sometimes you can't just drop into something without mentioning something else.
@@MonsieurDean there's like a half dozen other words that could be substituted for empire, seems like shade for shades sake
@@beefweiner call it what it is though
The North American Economic Zone, is a more fitting name.
The Economic zone that is trying to turn every Nation state into a mirror image of itself.
Globalist
Globalist
Globalist
Ok King Charles
From Northern VA originally, in Brooklyn now. America is really three countries: Magastan, Wokeistan, and Leavemealonestan
These three "nations" are located in, respectively, a large central triangle whose general borders are North Dakota, Texas, and Alabama, with a prong jutting into the Appalachians and a western appendage curving around into Mormon territory; the Pacific, much of the Southwest, and the East Coast from Maine to Virginia; and the three "swing" states of Iowa, Ohio, and Florida (one could arguably include Arizona, Wisconsin, Indiana, Michigan, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, and Georgia in this final group as well).
Of course, the above is more or less an ideological snapshot of America in the year 2020, and is already a bit dated. Not to mention that there are stubborn enclaves within all of these regions. My family's Southern California household, otherwise deep within "Wokeistan," is rabidly devoted to "Magastan" (much to my chagrin).
Man I really hope the people from Leavemealonestan never have to face any real issues or things might get kinda awkward there
From NoVA too. Me and you both know NoVA is NOT Virginia.
@@jibtibh.9245 no but Virginia has certainly changed and is much more Mid-Atlantic nowadays than Southern. NoVA, Fredericksburg, RVA, and the 757 are integrated into the Northeast Regional Amtrak line these days. Even in my lifetime (I’m 31), Virginia has definitely transitioned away from The South and more into the Megalopolis. Hampton Roads will be the Southern terminus of the Megalopolis in no time
@@tiramiseratops I could say the same of Wokeistan. There are no real social justice issues anymore, just a bunch of grifters masquerading as activists
I’m from the Chicago area and now live in rural Minnesota. The real culture transition from Illinois to Minnesota occurs at about the Wisconsin River which runs through Madison. North of Madison, the geography shifts to more forestry, and the ethnicity transitions to more German/Scandinavian. South of it you have a more distinctly Cumbrian English ancestry descended from the Appalachian frontiersmen. Still a lot of German ancestry, but more Missouri Synod versus Lutheran.
There’s a Heavy Black population South of it Too
Wisconsin South of Milwaukee has more in common with Northern Illinois than with the rest of the State. Milwaukee received a lot of immigration from up North, so it stands out from the areas directly South of the county.
Also live in rural MN and noticed that too. Grew up in the hills of Maryland, close to the mountains, but not in it. Very Catholic and family oriented over there with large German populations. The change there is very clear when you cross the Potomac and see the flat farms and cities on the other side of the state. Took me a while to acclimate to the MN nation .
Yeah, I’m from North Dakota/minnesota and generally agree. There’s a few distinct regions in MN depending on where you are in the state
@@Blaxton9this is bizarre to me. Is Western MD Catholic? Somehow this comment touches on both sides of my family…mom’s side is from rural Minnesota and wholly Scandinavian, Dad’s is Catholic from southern MD going back to the first settlers in the region. I had no idea western MD also had a Catholic background. Unfortunately I grew up thinking that area was stereotypically backwards…
this gives that
"what kind of Americans are you?" scene from Civil War a bit of new context.
"What kind of American are you?"
(Starts playing this video) "Well, you see...."
*(BANG!)*
Sounded like it would make for a really iconic scene, but the reality of the scene was much less interesting
After the election you should come back to this map and try to figure out how each country voted based on the vote counts. It would be hard to compile all the precise vote counts but it would be interesting to see a more in depth political view of these countries.
Sounds fun
Heck yeah! I already have a theory for how they will vote, but I definitely should revisit this afterward.
@@MonsieurDean pls fix pnw, eastern washington is more like idaho in culture, same with eastern oregon, we are separated by the cascades, on the west side of cascades its hippies, and on the east its cowboys and shit. PLEASE make eastern washington and eastern oregon separate to western.
@@MonsieurDean oooh theory video re the election please
@@MonsieurDean It'd be great to see a before and after, and the improvements to the model after coming into contact with practice.
That IS how a nation works if its nationalism is civically-defined, not ethnically-defined.
Thank you! If your a Pole in America, your just as much an American as a descendent from the Mayflower. Germany and Russia ruled Poland for a hundred years and the Poles were always second class citizens. Not in America.
non homogenous nations are doomed to ethnic conflict and eventual collapse.
Not true and against the very founding fathers and stock of this country, I know it sucks and I know people don't like reality however race does have something to do with natio the root of nation is defined as a people of shared birth place , that is racial definition especially when written in the 1600s
@@zachariahmccoy1301 If you knew anything about the Founding Fathers, you'd have known that they wrote in the 1700s.
@@Aristocles22 and ? Your point ? Magna Carta was written in the 1400s does it make the law of England anyless relevant? You seem to be ignorant of the importance of history.
Where's the Cajun nation. They're predominantly Catholics traditionally but have gone more towards pentecostal. Ethnicly French, Indian, and Spanish.
Unfortunately, partly due to being put in half redneck borders, were less and less of a culture with each passing year. We need to reverse anglicizing or in 30 years the only French thing left here will be the surnames.
I agree, I’m creole and despite New Orleans being historically catholic, my family is from Acadiana and are Protestant.
I've noticed that, while a decent amount of people from traditionally Protestant backgrounds are becoming Catholic, a shockingly high amount of people from traditionally Catholic backgrounds are becoming Evangelical Protestants, with Pentecostalism Non-denominationalism being the two most favored denominations. For example, a few years ago Brazil flipped from being a majority Catholic nation to a majority Pentecostal nation.
I'm not sure why these deep rooted Catholics are so drawn to a charismatic deonomiation on the polar opposite of the Christian spectrum. It merits some looking into.
@@benjamingrist6539 It is interesting. I would've thought Catholics would go to Orthodox.
You don't get an equal attention cake every time. You're southern.
1. New Englanders
2. East Coastfolk
3. Southerners, Cajuns, Floridafolk and Creoles
4. Black Belters
5. Greater Appalachians
6. Rust Belters
7. Great Lakesfolk (North Country & Lower Midwest)
8. Upper Midwesterners
9. Greater Rockians/Old West Trailerites
10. Saintslanders (Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints)
11. Chicanos, Texans and other Hispanics
12. West Coastfolk
13. Mountain Westerners
14. Navajo, Ute & Hopi
15. Native Hawaiian diaspora
What about PNW 😂
@yannysaintlaurel1064 West Coastfolk
What I learned from this video is that America is filled with handsome, picturesque white men.
Glad I'm not the only one who noticed this! All of 'em looked to be by the same artist, so maybe Monsieur Z got a volume discount? ;)
Celebrate white men! We’ve done cool stuff too!
lol the young men in America are mostly brown these days. Mr. Z's focus on christian denominations also feels like he's describing the demographics of last century.
USA, Brazil, Russia, China and Persia are what I call 'Imperial Nations'. They are big countries made of several nations of similar cultures, but distinct enough. They are distinct, but prefer being the same country.
I’d call them “Super-National States” Because “Empire” implies a patron/client or ruler/vassal relationship between the involved nations-which you can *argue* for all (cough cough Russia), but all at least claim to disavow. But yeah, the idea that State and Nation ought to align is a fairly modern one, and I’d argue a (well-designed and properly functioning) cosmopolitan federal state can protect the interests of many nations simultaneously and ideally minimize the worst aspects of nationalism, replacing them with a “nationalism” for the common goals of all.
@@IONATVS I like your term, but I think that Empire still fits, because even though the nations don't have a suzerain-vassal relationship inside the main culture group, there is still a force from the state trying to mush together or unify the mindset of their peoples, either by forcing some ideals from a place, or making they share their traits between one another.
Yes almost true except for the fact that China is an ethnostate. Sure, its minority populations number in the millions but Han Chinese are far over 90% of the population, compared to Brazil's 50/50 mix of white and mixed, or America's 55% whites, 13% blacks and the rest latino.
@@exenderlloyd7750 Northern and Southern Han have pretty significant cultural and linguistic differences, and the Tibetan & Uighur peoples are local majorities that very much DO NOT want to be ruled from Beijing. Manchuria and Inner Mongolia have been pretty thoroughly assimilated, but very much in the way Empires always have: by force.
Absolutely fair to call it an Empire, even though it likes to think of itself as a nation-state.
For China and Russia (and Turkey) "empire" fits very well because the main ethnic group uses violence to keep the country united
As someone raised in Utah, I think the Mormon nation is actually a little bigger than what’s on the map, but I guess it’s fair to say it’s more of a gradual gradient away from where the video border is. Most people don’t realize how many cities and towns the Mormons settled when they fled west. Look up “the Mormon corridor”, it’s insane. Like Las Vegas was initially settled by Mormons lol but then during the gold and other mining rushes other populations moved in.
I would argue that Florida should be counted separately from the Southern identity as they have very different historys from the rest of the south. Florida was only settled beginning in 1920s most of its population coming from the north especially those of more conservative backgrounds, this combined with Caribbean immigrantion, especially from Cuba has led to Florida having a unique culture that is only now beginning to collase. If i had describe Florida culture it would be laid back, urban, and agnostic, while being highly conservative fiscally and socially progressive. With Spanish somtimes being more important than English to the point it is influencing the way Floridians speak English.
This is only true of everything south of the panhandle, Pensacola to Jacksonville is very much is very much part of the south from the politics to the accent to architectural style and age of buildings.
Progressivism now seems to be declining in Florida overall. Florida is becoming the new Texas.
Have you been north of Gainesville? The picture you paint doesn't reflect that area.
@@craigbenz4835 I live in North Florida and I would agree the panhandle especially is still very southern, this has more to do with history and geography. In Jax for example the city is slowly turning into something more like Tampa as time goes on. In fact north Florida is like parts of Eastern Germany before the world wars, in that that the rural population was primarily polish but in the urban city's it was german. Most Southerns don't live in city's and the few city's in the south developed to export agricultural products. This, the southern parts of Florida will as time goes on and the state culture fully emerges the Southern population will continue to shrink. As for politics I think Florida position on social issues has more to with how far Dems have pushed the social Issues and the still strong but dying evangelical wing of the Republican party, most people vote Republican in the state to avoid taxes, which is the main reason people from up north retired or moved to Florida.
In regards to Spanish, the only place where Spanish might be used instead of English is Miami, in areas where the hispanic population outnumbers the English speaking population. The Spanish influenced accent you're describing is often called the Miami accent for this reason. Not common in the rest of Florida. Now, they say that the more north you go, the more southern it gets, but a more correct correlation would be urban vs rural, as historic southern influence still lingers in rural areas of central Florida, at the very least as far down as Okeechobee.
Always thought of myself as New Englander, but that Metropolitan description has shaken that a bit.
I always tell folks from abroad I'm from Massachusetts-Not-Boston. Far enough away to be different, close enough to be taxed.
Well remember that just like Europe, having a background in one of these nations doesn't mean you're restricted to these areas, or that you don't have a background made up of multiple nations. You can be an ancestrally French man born in Britain, or an Italian with some Austrian ancestry, sometimes the nations overlap and mix, but we can still recognize that they're there.
@@MonsieurDean Well said. My home is conservative, relative to the rest of the area, and for most of my neighbors, I'm in a different Overton Time Zone. I still get along with everyone here, laugh at most of the same jokes, and sneer at similar outsiders (Conneticut & NYC metro).
For me the five most culturally distinct U.S. cities are Chicago, Detroit, Philadelphia, NYC, and Boston. They are located within the German, Italian, and Irish ethnic belts. However, the first two cities transcend their "German-ness."
Boston is a clean European style American city meanwhile Massachusetts is just murica with slightly higher density
He did say New England extends to parts of Massachusetts and New York IN THE VIDEO, though! You can stay a New Englander in peace...
These aren’t countries but concentrated cultures mixing with surrounding cultures. It’s not unique to America, but it’s only happening now because America is a fairly new country (especially in its united state) and we’re so big. France, Germany, Spain, and many other nations used to be a collection of many smaller nations and identities before unifying into what they are today. But when they originally unified, they were still a collection of different cultures until over time, they all formed one distinct identity. America can do the same although it will be much harder and take a lot longer given our size.
He didn’t say they were countries. He said they were nations. And they have been distinct nations for hundreds of years.
America is also not a young nation anymore.
@ Most haven’t been here that long. Our oldest colonies have only been around since the 1600s and those are the oldest American cultures unless you count the natives, but respectfully, they don’t really count as part of American culture. Then you have cultures out west that only started to have identities a hundred years ago.
A few centuries ago may sound old but when you take into account that there are universities in England dating back to the 13th century, a city in Greece that dates back to 5000 BCE, and world wonders that are as old as human history itself, America is still young.
@@ADMusic1999 you don’t think the Puritans count as part of American culture? That’s crazy talk
@@ADMusic1999 America as a cultural touchstone is older than almost any other still around in the West today. It’s older than the cultural conception of “German-ness” for example.
The fact that Oxford and Cambridge are old is meaningless when the “British nation” as a concept is barely 300 years old. Same goes for “Italian.” In fact, “Italian American” predates Italian Nationalism. Same goes for “German American.”
Europeans vastly overestimate age of their national identities. Nobody in the 1300s identified as “culturally French,” for example. “Spain” as a kingdom only predates the American colonies by about a century. And “Spaniard” as a cultural force is younger than “Massachusetts.”
@@carsonianthegreat4672 I alluded to the Puritans without spelling it out when I said “our oldest colonies have only been around since the 1600s.” That’s only 400 years ago which isn’t that long ago in the span of human history and the cultures that exist around the world.
When we talk about cultures, they are distinct from the national identity which I think you know that as you pointed out several cultures in America that are separate from the national identity of generic “American” (if such a term exists). So while the national identity of France may be relatively new, the distinct cultures within the French nation are much older dating back centuries. Same with the cultures that inhabit England, Spain, Italy, etc. Juxtapose that with the cultures that inhabit America and you see the difference.
We don’t have cultures here going back that far because we didn’t get here until the 17th century. And even then, there was no unique American identity really until the Civil War. Until that point, people identified more as New Yorkers or Georgians than as Americans. Even now, it’s hard to pinpoint one true American culture as we’re all so different and diverse.
Appalachians where you at?
Over here cringing at his inability to pronounce "Appalachia".
Down here in the Holler, of course. 😉
@@LMXPebble Apple Litch Uh
@@MonsieurDean appa-LATCH-uh
In Appalachia
As a lifelong Californian, Calling any part of California “Texan” or “neo-Texan” is way off. California has 6-10 distinct cultures and regions. Central coast and Jefferson aren’t the same as San Diego, the desert & LA, central valley and the sierras is not the same as the Bay Area. California is its own thing but definitely not Texan or neo-texan lol
I can agree. Being a 4th generation Californian(before that founders of Boston) I can say that California has many sub groups. Almost certainly it's because there are so many biomes. Our family lives in basically all of them. I grew up ranching, others farming. Lived in cities and small towns, coast and interior. I grew up hunting and fishing in the huge Sierra mountains spanning the entire California east. Let me tell you, customs in the mountains are completely different from our cities. Simplistically, one you carry a gun, one you don't. Sitting around a campfire once an old cowboy told me, "As long as you don't sh*t on my front porch I don't care what you do." Ranch life is different from those, but closer to mountain. The desert people are their own thing too. Jefferson State and Lost Coast people are very different. Mountain range separations make a big difference.
You can really gauge it by how much people in one part of California dislike people from another part moving there. In the central Sierras people are generally fine with folks from the valley, up north, or a distance south in the range, but really hate it when folks from the bay area or LA move in.
Lumping Californians all together is already absurd becuase Californians don't even like each other. Like people from Slovang are going to see people from Los Angeles as different people.
You clearly did not see the map to see where he called Neo-Texas. And it is implied Neo-Texas only refers to the Latino area of Texas and Latino was the overcompassing term he chose for the entire zone...
@@nerdsinthewoods4245yep I lived in the high desert of socal and can confirm this , they dislike LA or Bay area people
The nation of Hawaii has a well defined official crown prince
Regions yes, but the internal integration of language, interaction, economic interdependence and shared laws make America and Canada stand alone countries, America is just federal while Canada is confederal. More power to regions sure, but America i still believe is united.
@@23uncbball How would you feel about more Localism and Decentralization and more diverse economic policies implemented by each state?
Example: Some states are more market oriented and others are more government intervention focused.
Aww thats cute. You think Californians are my countrymen?
@@PhyllisLane-xj5uf just saying lmfao, we coloradans effing hate californians
Not even touching on how much language and dialect has diverged in the US, a population speaking the same language, practicing the same laws, and participating in the same economy does not a nation make, once again this is an empire. In Rome you speak Latin, follow Roman law, and pay with government issued denarius, regardless of if you're a Gaul, a Syrian, or a Greek.
@@PhyllisLane-xj5uf SoCal is all business and bad driver stereotype, NorCal is chill as heck, central Cal is where Sacramento, the capital of California exists and is rare to mention when there is LA, San Francisco, Orange Country, San Diego, and to joke, the colony of the Philippines the west coast, the colony of china, Irvine or Anaheim, and the colony of mexico, California, U.S.
You can say we’re 50 different nation states that are unified under one federal system
I’m Black. I’m from Philadelphia and I noticed that Black people who live in other major US cities function very similarly. I think this is a result of the treatment Black people had to deal with wherever they moved to.
While I agree, I also think I have more in common with a native Hawaiian or white Californian culturally than I do with black people from New England or the South.
Or it could be the fact that most of the population of black Americans are from the South during the Jim crow era, the majority of the black population in the South, moved North, taking their culture and dialects with them, leading to a mono culture.
If you read northern black letters to each other during this time. You would see the northern black americans had a very different culture then the southern based black culture of today.
@austindavis8977 Thomas Sowell talked about this subject many times and wrote many books on it as well
For the most part blacks have a common origin in the south and took their general mannerisms with them when they left for better opportunities outside that region.
Nowadays social media seems to be the great unifying thing between black communities. They all consume the same media and follow the same trends and influencers, so there isn't really much real isolation between them at all.
No. I’m from California. We have completely different cultures in different regions. Life is slower paced on Atlantic Ocean and we’re basically in Mexico/ Japan influenced place
As a missourian now living in alaska, i am pleased to see that missouri is properly split between its four main parts. The distiction between st louis area, little dixie, and the ozarks is uncanny. Northern missouri i just call iowa.
I've recently moved to Utah from Ohio, and honestly the cultural differences are massive (and no, not just because of Mormonism lol). I could talk for hours about all the differences, but it's amazing because I always felt like a complete outcast in Ohio, whereas here I fit right in very naturally.
I'm Argentina but this year I've had the opportunity to visit and spend some time in Atlanta, North Carolina, Tennessee, New Jersey, and New York and honestly, the differences I saw between all those regions track quite well with what the video shows. Atlanta is basically the spiritual capital of African Americans, what with MLK's house and pretty much everyone being black and whatnot, North Carolina is very distinct from Tennessee and NY/NJ but you can still see both old Anglo elements but also the "Metropolitan" pockets of Italian and Hispanic surnames especially in places like Raleigh. The Appalachians are functionally their own country, I had the opportunity to visit very "backwoods" parts of the state and smaller towns, and while you can tell the rural areas are worse-for-wear I did also see a very distinct identity that doesn't show any signs of being replaced any time soon. New York and New Jersey are basically one big city-state with just about every race and ethnicity you can imagine, but especially in New Jersey you could tell the particular Ellis Island elements had a lot of presence, save in areas like, say, Harlem or Palisades Park's Koreatown.
Another kinda tangential note but I could also notice a specific white American "look", like especially those of Anglo-Germanic descent, but also some Italians have specific phenotypic characteristics that make them look different from whites from Europe or Argentina, can't quite put my finger on it but they're very square-faced.
Also, another tangent, I can see the African-American nation becoming some sort of Jewish/Gypsy-like minority, primarily urban and culturally influential but also very "closed" and inward-looking, probably because of the "one drop rule" cultural idea Americans have, I remember meeting this girl in Tennessee who, while you could tell she was mixed, would've been considered white in Argentina and probably parts of Europe to, but according to herself and all her friends she was black because her grandmother was black.
The German Americans at the Great Lakes spill into the Northeast and the east coast.
Right. They also skew more Jewish the further east you go.
Great video. They don't teach this in schools. I am an army veteran. When I went to basic training I have the chance to see these differences because the army mixes people from all over the US. Even so, we were able to work together. Thank you.
Most Americans live in what could be considered "megapolises," that is, closely located cities spread over multiple states that are tightly integrated due to continuous transportation, residential, and commercial services. These areas have more unified identities not just within themselves but also with other ultra-urbanized locations. This zone-culture subsumes the majority of the black nation acting as a protective sheath ending at Alabama border. The FUN thing about this is that these areas are growing along the lines of highways and are only halted by mountains and swamps.
As a Mormon (or rather a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints), I videos like this fill my heart with the pride of Deseret (despite the fact that I've lived almost none of my life in Utah).
Texas west of the piney woods is far more close with Appalachia than the Deep South. Texas was basically a colony of Tennessee in the 1820s, our founders are mostly from there and our character and values are much closer. Mississippi feels foreign to us here, Appalachia feels like home.
At the end of the day though, Texas is Texas. I know we say it all the time but it’s true. Hispanics are statistically the most prideful of Texan identity, separating us is inaccurate.
Texas as a state is a bit of a messy area, but I see what you mean.
There's a real cultural difference between American Hispanics (what dean calls "neo-texans") and Tejanos. Tejanos have been here in Texas (Tejas) since the days of the Viceroyalty of New Spain, earlier in fact on the native side of their lineage. Texians (aka Anglos of various cultural persuasions) & Tejanos are two distinct nations who formed the Texan state together in alliance against the tyranny of the Centralist Republic of Mexico under Santa Anna who, among other political figures, shredded the 1824 Constitution of the First Mexican Republic. Some Tejanos get MAD if you dare to call them hispanic. They are specifically and thoroughly Texan.
@@KnoxEmDown exactly. The Hispanic population Texas is just as pridefully Texan as anyone else if not more.
@@CullodenCowboy I was with you until you said Hispanic. We fought two wars against Mexicans and kicked 75% of them out. Mexicans are not Texan. They are not welcome. They have to go back.
You should do a video on Mormon colonization. The Mormon corridor stretching from Mexico all the way into Canada has left a mark even where the Mormons abandoned
18:16 A "relatively recent nation"???? You do realize that the Spanish Empire was there LOOOONG before the area was captured by anglo Americans, right? The vast majority of Latinos in those areas are NOT immigrants, they're ancestors were there hundreds of years before the USA was even born. Even so, you can't define the are as being a Latino area, as it hovers closer to a 50/50 split between Latinos and anglos, and despite all the bullshit you see on the news, we all get along pretty well and are frequently intermarried. That's why the US southwest is generally opposed to a lot of racist policies coming out of conservative circles.
Too bad that wasn't enough for you guys to try to make Harris into a President, lmao
Kansas City is definitely not southern AT ALL. It is deeply connected with St. Louis and Denver.
I believe the Black, both African American and Immigrant Black, influence in many of these regions has been underestimated. You have 4 million Black folk in Texas, 3.7 million in Florida, 3.5 million in Georgia & New York, i can go on. Yet, Black folk are only mentioned in the Black Belt region.
It’s strange. Afro Americans alone were the majority in South Carolina, Mississippi, and Louisiana. 50 million Afro Americans with 97% being having strong ties to the southern states due to the slave trader- more Afro Americans than their are Canadians, Australian, Spain etc…
There’s a strong white washing of the histories of the Americas(primarily US and Brazil).
1 is too many
I think you exaggerate by calling these regional differences nations, If you compare us to a country where the different regions actually are seperate Nations like India or Nigeria it becomes pretty clear we are one Nation, I made freinds from California, Texas, and Washington while living in Madison Wisconsin this dosn't happen in India except for in Mumbai and Delhi but cross regional freindships like this are common in every corner of the US beacuse we are one Nation
As a Missourian, the state is definitely split between multiple regions and cultures - Ozark/Appalachia in the south, St. Louis/Midwest in the east, Heartland in the north, but Kansas City is not Southern, as it appears on the map, or at least that has not been my experience of the city. What is your reasoning?
KC is split down the middle between MO and KS and split top from bottom by the Missouri River. North of the river leans Heartland and south of the river, though still essentially Heartland, has some Ozark/Appalachia, though only on the Missouri side. The KS side is all Heartland with maybe with a touch of Texas/OK.
I think French Louisiana is definitely a nation. We might act like general Southerners a lot, but when push comes to shove we are ethnically and culturally distinct. (Even if its unfortunately being eroded as we speak)
I think it’s precisely the light grey in the south of Louisiana
Need to do a video on the native nations in the USA
Northern Wyoming has a sizable population of people descended from Polish coal miners that arrived in the 1900’s. Even today, there’s a ton of people in Sheridan with last names like Jolovich (Americanized “Jałowicher” I think,) Legerski, Kawulok, etc. Some people there even still speak the language.
America being an Empire is indeed true for different reasons including the whole 'anyone can be American purely from believing in an ideal or two' thing.
America is a *huge* continent.
Plus, anything/anyone American is from the
Continent of America!
@@CaptainAmerica001 There is no "American continent" just like there is no Euro-African or Afro-Asiatic continent. Being able to walk from Egypt to Jordan doesn't make it one continent.
@@AllTheUrbanLegends
America definitely is a continent & an American is from the Continent of America.
If not, what is America?
@@CaptainAmerica001 "America is one continent" was an imperial project that is only still believed by countries in Latin Europe and some of their former colonies in Latin America. The Americas are, geologically, 3 continents. If you want to tell me that Europe and Asia are one continent I'm with you but Canada and Uruguay are not on the same continent.
@@AllTheUrbanLegends
America is a continent & an American is from the Continent of America.
Why is America not a single continent?
Say it with me Monsieur: App-a-LATCH-aa.
its app-a-lay-sha
I said it both ways just to mess with you specifically.
@@monkeybluntas an APP A LATCH AN I must say, you’re wrong.
@@monkeybluntif you say app-a-laycha, I'll throw an apple atcha
@@MonsieurDean Ummm, achtuallly you are supposed to yodel the middle part.
Ohians💀💀💀💀💀💀💀
From Massachusetts, there is nearly no observable difference culturally between Vermont, New Hampshire and Massachusetts nowadays. They’re one region.
One region? Or one people?
@@MonsieurDean I think what you're missing is how New England works as a larger region. No one is trying to convince you that the White Mountains region is the same as Metro Boston. That's absurd. But politically and historically the White Mountains are tied to Boston and the New England economy in a way that is irrelevant to anything that goes on West of Champlain. There's so much regional history you clearly aren't aware of that is distorting your view of how the northeast works. It's kind of funny how in your assessment and divisions you have done the American thing and divided land based on terrain and aesthetic without taking into consideration local history and family ties.
And no, it's not one uniform region, it's probably more like thirty something regions that all differ in economy, culture, and geography.
I bet you think Bostonians go leaf peeping in the Berkshires. Does the word Kanc mean anything to you?
Ever heard of the Big E? Are you even at all aware of Old Home days or or the strong tradition of fairs in New England?
There's so much that distinguishes New England that you consistently ignore in your videos, and it comes across as you diminishing the people of the United States to aesthetics often caused by climate and economies often caused by federal policies or geography. Even worse is that you sometimes take the racist route and use haplogroups as reason to divide regions. I urge you to go out and talk to strangers. Travel and explore. Really learn the people of the world and what makes them tick. It's so much more amazing than you seem to acknowledge.
I’m from the Netherland, and you can become Dutch, just like you can become American. And people that choose to become Dutch are attracted to the culture. Americans will have different cultures in their country, like all other countries have. But they are all Americans, with some very specific American traits.
You can’t become Dutch like you can become American. All the countries in the Americas have birthright citizenship-born in the USA or Brazil or Canada that person is an automatic citizen.
Europes rules are mostly about blood ties to the country (jus soli with restrictions).
Nonsense. I can be born in a barn in China but it doesn’t make me a Chinese horse. Likewise, just because some Moroccan, Turkish, African, or Ukrainian, lives in NL and has NL pass doesn’t make them actually Dutch.
For the build up to this video being about utahism, I’m surprised it had the shortest airplay lol 😅 I’m glad you mentioned the danish settlers all the same that usually gets overlooked
I feel like Mormondom is already so well defined and legitimate that it needs no further introduction.
There is significant cultural variation between Tex-Mex Latinos and those in California. The surrounding cultural influences in Texas vs California couldn't be more different. SoCal and the San Joaquin/Sacramento Valleys have a large presence of multiple Asian peoples, plus So Cal Latinos likely include a greater percentage of Non-Mexican Latinos from Central and South America. Texas is culturally and religiously conservative for the most part while California is just the opposite.
I find it so strange how Brazil is almost the same size physically and population-wise to the USA, but at the same time is incredibly more homogeneous. Although we do have our differences, everyone in Brazil considers themselves Brazilian first and someone from the Amazon region can relate to someone from Rio, and someone from São Paulo can relate to someone from the Northeast
Love the addition of the images; we all have an inner chad lol
I love these American Nations videos. This provides much needed cultural context and nuance that is necessary to understand why we don't/can't always get along.
Some new ones about your analysis of the Heartlander Volk. The story of my people doesn't only come from the Volga region but also the Black Sea region and the German settlements there. What also you forgot to mention, despite a large Lutheran population amongst the Germans from Russia population it was roughly divided in half between Catholic and Lutheran, with a lean slightly towards the Catholic religious side like my family. Also us Germans from Russia tend to be on the swarthier side because most of our extraction originally came from the Alpine German population in the southern German states such as Bavaria with my family. So often Germans from the Great Lakes will have lighter phenotypes than the German population on the Great Plains. Also because our population received persecution within Russia, we were more hearty add withstanding persecution during the first and second world war in America, so many of our people refuse to Anglicize properly by maintaining our surnames in the original German and cap German as many of our household languages up until the boomer generation where that generation destroyed a lot of traditional culture they also destroyed our ethnic distinction and refused to carry on the German tradition. Even today with our dialect of English that we speak in the Great Plains if you know how to look you can see the German influence upon the English spoken within the area. An elite cadre of our population in Gen Z are even re-adding or identity as Germans again above being Americans. Even I being in the military will always call myself German and/or Bavarian and just use American as a nationality term. I have also met a lot of these German-Americans in the armed forces starting to re-identify with their German ethnic identity over a broader American identity.
The Midwest is Amerikaner land.
I dont want to read all of that, but I agree with you
I’m German American yet live in the south. Someday I want to go to the midwest to help revive the German American identity.
I have lived in America all my life but I consider myself Russian. I think that more people should identify with their ancestors and traditional culture rather than with their citizenship status of a government that has dubious representation of interests. I think that ethnic identity is more important than citizenship or government identity.
@@konstantinrebrov675 I agree whole heartily
Great video like always. Loved the art used here too, looked so cool. Keep it up!
Thanks For this z! Love your content ❤❤❤❤
If we’re being honest, the United States of America is equivalent to the European Union each state is basically it’s own country and we’ve all just agreed to work together for common goals
Keep up the good work! 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
🫡
I really don’t know how you left Boston and Rhode Island out of New England? I don’t think anyone in New England agrees with this
Although the naming convention can be debated, I think the “Montanans” are a good way of understanding the cultural context of the Rocky Mountain region.
From my personal experience (I live in Oregon) it helps to explain the differences in political ideology between western and eastern Oregon. The developed urban regions such as the Portland metro area and the I-5 corridor tend to be more liberal and secular, while the more rural eastern region (as well as pockets in southern Oregon or parts of the Willamette Valley) tend to be more conservative and religious.
As someone from the border area of the montanan/western nations in WA, i do think the border needs to be redrawn along the cascades instead of the columbia river, or at least there shoukd be a subregion of either one that is west of the columbia/east of the cascades representing an area with a large hispanic protestant population
The Arizona portion of the Southern Nation should be split into the SoCal and Mormon/Utah regions. They are both much more fitting, especially historically
Can you do a video on the uk riots as a Brit I feel we are having very similar issues with America on identity and why all the cultures are clashing. Whether this will happen in the US as well would love to see a scenario about it.
I might just!
Ohh trust me once trump gets arrested which he will because of the lawfare in the country shits gonna go down jan6th on steroids idk im staying out of it but yea 2024 election gonna suck both ways
@@MonsieurDean thank you the only way we can save ourselves is having the canzuk union cooperation with the US especially Trump being very pro Anglo sphere
@@josephmaycock9the difference is and sad reality is... the us is largely split in 2, the difference is one section is contained to large cities and the other controls the rest of the us. Just look at us voting by counties. Most of the us is red id say 90% is. The blue sections are completely surrounded. The issue there is, the red sections control all the oil, all the farming, all the resources. In a "Civil war" type situation the war would be won by team red simply because they have the resources, not to mention red areas typically work together and have a greater sense of community, they also have the vast majority of the weapons. Team blue might have the numbers but they don't have the community aspect and they dont have resources. It's hard to win anything when you're not united and try to strike up different factions.
I don't think it'd take long for team red to win. All they have to do is refuse to send resources to the cities and it's gg well played... they'd have to rely heavily on imports from other countries IF they could strike up some form of diplomacy with them and even then they'd have to negotiate those terms almost instantly because if you have no food you can't survive for very long. With a collapsed economy and 0 resources there's nothing to trade for, so who would bail them out?
I hear this "American Civil war" thrown around by people who typically come from large cities and are not truly aware of the totality of the power of the red areas. There wouldn't be one, cut off the supply chain and it's over within a month. It's easy to hold major choke points that all major cities have and just starve people out. The in fighting within the city is their biggest weakness and they'll take themselves out while red areas would work together and continue on with life. Just look at the criminal records for large cities vs rural communities. Once there's no food on the shelves the gangs will be kicking in doors and stealing from their own team lol.
That's why it's impossible for one side to win. Culture and resources. That's just on a civilian level, I think if the military split it'd be even more lopsided, I just look at the kids today and see a large number of one team not being pro military and the other team being the ones who are enlisting.
As far as the uk goes idk, whoever controls the resources will win. Sadly I think yall are going the wrong direction and the team that'll win is the radical anti-uk population. Your gov wants it that way for some reason.
Great video! How do you identify the boundaries of each region? I’d love to see some of the sources you used.
15 nations you say? Combine two of them into one and we can return to the Betsy Ross Flag. 😎👍
P.S. No dividing up Pennsylvania, in fact it should expand.
Localism>>>Nationalism>>>Globalism
Nah just send the African one to Liberia and adopt the Fallout flag
If any merger would be possible it would be between the southern nation and the Appalachian Nation
UTAHISM NOT GLOBALISM
@@MonsieurDean I think they mean "greater than," not "pointing."
Combining 2 would leave you with 14, you'd have to combine 3.
The character cards are a really nice addition to this presentation
It pains me that so many in the New World fail to see the futility of the "Propositional" Nation. A nation is not a checklist of values, it is a folk, a tribe, a clan, a tradition, not some stupid cringe dot point on a notepad. Case and point I wholly reject this stupid and cringe idea of ever being "Australian" no, no I'm not "Australian", and I was never asked if I wanted to be Australian, so be Australian I shall not. What I am, what no ruling class can ever rob from me, is New South Welsh. We are the true men and women of New South Wales. Reject the stupid and cringe Australianisms of our Canberran ruling class. Embrace your true selves as New South Welshmen, and Welshwomen.
This is why I refuse to vote for the cringe platitudes of One Nation. Because we are not "One Nation" and we never will be. What we need here is something like a New South Welsh Secession party to secede out of this crusty bunghole island. Or New South Welsh First Union Party.
Exactly. The most significant identity comes from blood. Ideas can be changed on a whim, but ideas do not change what a person is.
@@somehowstillhere8766 The idea of a single federated Australian Commonwealth only made sense due to the shear homogeneity of the population up until about the 1970's and to a a degree our ruling class must have known this because following the 1967 Referendum to incorporate remote Aboriginal communities under the Races Power of the Constitution, 1967 marks a significant demarcation point between the Australia that had been growing organically since Federation and a much more top-down prescriptive version to try and "Wokify" the idea of being Australian to a hippy boomer liberal audience. This fact has only become more and more noticeable with time and in my view can't continue to be brushed under the rug anymore. While we may once have been "Aussies" the reality is we really aren't anymore. We've grown into something else, something more transcendent and real. That being New South Welsh.
@@Peak_Aussieman same here in the US. non-European immigration after 1965 and increasingly pushing the "nation of immigrants" idea transformed the concept of American to be meaningless. More and more race is the most coherent way to define people because it is something real versus malleable ideas.
@@somehowstillhere8766 True, compound this by the abolition of the Immigration Restriction Act and due to Australia's small population which had become accustomed to on-demand contraception a few years prior, and the stage was set for a serving of one dead civilisation down under. What are we? What does "being Australian" mean today? It means being a drunken hoon waiting for his next Centrelink money so he can spend it all on grog and cheap Thai massages. Another reason to grow up and be New South Welsh instead. Be New South Welsh instead. It's better that way.
Why regionalism? What does a sydney-sider have to do with someone from lithgow or mudgee, let alone broken hill? Are the people from tweed heads and the gold coast all that different? What matters is shared British ancestry and tradition. Lines drawn on a map only mean so much, and state borders can change at the drop of a hat. Also why bother with secession when NSW's biggest city is becoming a Chinese/Indian shithole anyway?
*_ADOS (American Descendants of Slaves) are a unique and distinct ethnic group._* They are a mixture of various ethnic groups from West Africa and Europe. Slavery was so profound that it even changed the genetics of an entire people, revealing one way many ways they were exploited. Because of the horrors of slavery, every single enslaved African girl and women was violated, those men passed their European ancestry to their enslaved children. This resulted in African Americans having paternal European lineage and maternal African lineage.
I am a huge nerd for anthropology, geopolitics, theology and cultural history and I just have to tell how amazing this video was. I was nerding out describing it to my roommate. The pictures you included to show the general ethnic and racial heritage of each region *chef's kiss*. It was well structured, well paced, well narrated, engaging. Just can't tell you how much I enjoyed your video. Time to go through your whole video list
🫡
Great explanations and visuals.
I am a Russian immigrant, brought to the US by parents when I was 4 years, and I have lived here all my life. Now I am 26, and this is the first time I've ever heard of such nuances. I am surprised at how little I know about this country. Very informative video.
Welcome to our American melting pot. 🫠
Get out of here while you still can. Why would you continue to live in this hell hole? Go back to Russia.
I am from Michigan, originally from New York. I notice the cultural differences once I leave Downstate New York.
What he calls Midwestern I would call Great Lakes, and what he calls Ohioan I would call Midwestern. I tend to think of Ohio or Indiana more when I hear people talk about Midwestern culture than Northern New York or Michigan.
There was one thing he said about the South that puzzles me, though. How are the values of "small government" and "self-sufficiency" socially conservative? Given their anti-authoritarian basis, wouldn't most people call them socially liberal?
@@SeasideDetective2I think a good way to explain it would be they're politically liberal(or, libertarian) and socially conservative.
@@Reubentheimitator6572 I would not use those terms. I think when most people say "socially conservative," they're thinking of old-fashioned attitudes about sex, religion, and similar things. To me, those aren't social issues, but cultural issues. I think of social conservatism as "rich white men maintain their hold on power," which is something to which I'd think anyone who wasn't rich would object - at least in theory. I realize of course, that social issues, as I've defined them above, bleed into both economic issues and cultural issues. But I think it's a tragedy that so many conservative Americans wind up favoring social conservatism because they think it will lead to cultural conservatism, or even that they think the two are one and the same, when that often isn't the case.
Yep - the world of the Great Lakes, north of I-80, is significantly different from the Midwest areas to the south of it.
@@SeasideDetective2It’s a shared mistrust of radical new ideas that they fear would cause chaos. Better the devil you know…
Missed the culture/countries don’t stop at the USA land boarders - the arcadians to Louisiana, the dakotas I to Canada, the Quebecois into New England, the Third Coast (Great Lakes) into Ontario, SW USA into Mexico, Baja California into Mexico, British Columbia into PNW.
📍 Also missed the territories: Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico, Guam, Samoa, etc.
📍 Native American Indians (Canada, USA, Mexico) tribal influences - Iroquois Confederacy, etc.
7:13 that sketch looks suspiciously familiar lol
Handsome fella
Very interesting video, and fantastic drawings
How people identify themselves is completely subjective, with america their is a common culture and language, and a marginal desire for succession; why would a people with all that in common, break apart over religious or ethnic that those people don't even divide themselves by?
Monsieur Z is not talking about secession, just that American is an Imperial/Federal identity and local identity (at least in the past was more prominent) Sadly Globalization and Cosmopolitanism has made things more homogeneous, but local cultures still exist, you just got to find it. I'm a Localist, but reject secession.
On the topic of New England it’s really not a minor bleed over into Massachusetts I feel New England starts in Massachusetts it’s the center of the New England identity while as a mass hole myself I share way more experiences with people in Maine new Hampshire Vermont Rhode Island and Connecticut then anywhere else in the us
This is probably the number one reason the national political parties need to be broken up. It's literally impossible for the national political parties to represent everyone, or even a majority, heck even a plurality.
The south was not Baptist and Rural (at least in modern terms) before the civil war. The south was actually very wealthy.
Following the civil war, it all fell into poverty, and didn’t even become republican until the 70s when it started dropping its racism.
I would change 2 minor things about this map:
- The Finnish subregion (Copper Country) around the superior should be considered its own distinct area,perhaps since it's more like Scandamerica than the Midwest but more freedealing.
- The border between Montanans & Westerners should be redrawn along the Cascades than the Columbia River, or at least make a subregion that is west of the Columbia but East of the Cascades
Ya, eh.
It's easier to maintain an imperial identity when that empire doesn't squash, but celebrates your local identity too.
Why does the Appalachian portrait look so much like Jake Paul 💀
Jake Paul - Mountain Man
Amazing video
You should do a battle royal video with this map
That'd be fun
Nah, leave it to the HOI4 TH-camrs.
This video is so damn cool!
Great work! I would love to see a massive demographic survey of cultural and political values broken down by county. I wonder what ethnic and national boundaries would emerge.
Maybe that'll be a mission for my next trip around the country.
The southeastern coast of Florida including Miami was settled by people from New England and New York beginning in the 1870s, and they have been migrating there ever since. While it's famous today for having a lot of Spanish speakers especially from Cuba, it's culturally more like NYC to the point that it gets called 6th borough and most of the rest of Florida considers it not part of the real South.
It is way more diverse than that, which is what you would expect in a free society, which is what makes it one country.
Also worth noting the reason the German settlers are so different from one another is also because they came from different German speaking countries. It wasn't until the mid to late 19th century these different countries would merge together to become Germany.
So true!
Germany was governmentaly divided into different states, but was considered a nation since at least the 1100's. The Holy Roman Emporer was also usually King of the Romans (any Imperial citizen) or King of Germany.
Even as late as the 1940's in Frankenmuth, Michigan the locals would talk to grandpa, whose family was from Prussia, but not grandma whose family was from Bavaria.
excellent video
Glad you liked it!
I was about to get all "them's fighting words" when you described New Englanders as being influenced by Anglo-Canadians across the border, then I realized you meant Quebec, not the Canadian rust belt.
Less Quebec and more Newfoundland, in my opinion...
@@manniking233 naw Newfoundland is settled from the West Country, not East Anglia
@@manniking233 I guess when Georgia was a military colony, Nova Scotia was part of New England.
Very good regional descriptions. Even better, the guys in all those paintings are so damn cute!!!
Graham and Greenlee county in Arizona should be part of Deseret/Utah culture.
Southern Arizona also wasn’t accurate whatsoever
Being from Orlando originally with a Nicaraguan Father who grew up in Miami, I feel Central Florida and Metro Miami have a lot in common with the Metropolitan Nation, after all, both regions wete primarily built by people from the Metropolitan region originally
The only difference is that Metro Miami feels more like a blend between the Metropolitan Nation and Latin America under a Cuban influence, whereas Southwest Florida feels like a blend between the Metropolitan Nation and the various Midwestern nations, and Central Florida a blend between the Metropolitan, Southern White, and African-American nations
I’d say you can probably break the south between North Carolina/Virginia (it feels more suburbanized and has a distinctly more secular feeling as opposed to the rest of the Piedmont lowland areas, you can also note this in election maps where it is basically a border between the urbanized North East and South) and South Carolina along with the remainder of the south.
Virginia is still mostly Southern in identity but her close proximity to the large population of the DC suburbs (NoVA) swing her election map much closer to the center than it would otherwise be.
@@tau-5794 I’m saying the issue is the coasts, if you went down it to about the edge of North Carolina you’d think you were in Delaware.
Made this infinitely more complicated than it needs to be. Three nations….urban, suburban, rural. Small states and large states are divided this way.
I have to make sure because maybe I’m just seeing it wrong, you made sure to include south-eastern Idaho into Deseret? I would much sooner call someone from Pocatello my brother than someone from St. George
I would say these are more accurately describes ethnicities rather than full on nations. If These were full on nations they would not be able stand on their own two feet.
I’m from Texas (live in Louisiana now though) and honestly Texas could be its own nation. Not just because it was its own for a while but it has its own sort of settlement patterns and culture that stems from the deep south, Appalachia, and later Germans. My ancestors have been in Texas since around the civil war. My dad’s ancestors were Appalachians, primarily Pennsylvania German and Scots-Irish with some Anglo, Dutch and maybe some native mixture, and my mom’s side is more deep southern from Georgia originally, primarily Anglo, Welsh, Highland Scottish and later Texan German. Dad’s ancestor fought for Tennessee’s union regiment and mom’s for Georgia’s confederate militia. Ultimately what I’m yapping about is Texas on its own is a sort of synthesis between Appalachia, the Deep South, and the German migrations. I love content like this, it’s a very interesting way to view America as different nations. It makes a lot of sense really. It’s like our own newer ethnogeneses, similar to our ancestors as well as cousins in Europe had centuries ago.
Also it’s historically Latino Tejano population before German migration to the state. That would be interesting.
Eva Longoria has ties to Texas since 1600’s.
@@Therockfan30 the Tejano population for sure adds to the difference of Texas as well
Dude. You and the Canadians together are a more coherent nation than Spain. "15 countries"... sure...
0:38 comparably to other nations, yes it is. Do you think a foreigner can distinguish between Georgian and a New-Yorker? Heck, you many times can't know the difference. They are so vague you literally categorize people by skin color.
I think the fact that foreigners can't tell Americans apart has more to do with how America projects itself as one nation on the world stage. But just because they see us as one blob doesn't mean we are. Even if cosmopolitanism and Globalization had made everything more homogeneous. Local cultures still persist, you just got to look for it.
@@AmericanImperium1776
If anything, the world knows about Americans much more than any other countries. I'm from the Middle East and I see way more Americans on the internet than people from my country.
@@user-sh3cf7kd6e Yeah, they know about America more than probably even their own countries, but they don't really know the individual states and what makes each one tick. They just know from the movies, TV Shows, music, and video games we put out. Which honestly I don't really think is a good view into genuine American culture. It's just "pop culture" which has more of a global feel.
Race is the most defining characteristic rather than regional identity in the US. "American" doesn't mean anything anymore.
@@callmefleet
Well... it can also be both. The Dalek empire.
America is ONE nation.
It is a federation of many cultures and peoples.
7 minutes into this, as a sociologist with multiple ethnic roots, I'm so far intrigued by the accuracy of this analysis. Well done!
@Monsieur Z Awesome video topic! Do you also have a similar one but with the native americans for each region?? Thanks
Having these differences, is what makes us a World Power, imo..
Silicon valley produces Tech.. Texas and The flatlands of MT can produce oil.. (and other places)
Economic zone in the Northeast..
Losts of farmland/Lumber in PNW..
Makes us very hard to de stable..