Zeiss SFL 10x40 vs Zeiss SF 10x42 - Field Tested Binocular Review

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ก.ค. 2024
  • I have had a ton of requests to review the Zeiss SFL 10x40 binoculars as they sit in a very interesting place in the market. Price-wise they sit right in-between most company’s alpha and mid-range options. That made me very curious to see how they stacked up regarding performance. As usual, I tried to offer a good blend of technical data and my unbiased subjective perspective. I hope this review is helpful.
    0:00 - Intro
    2:12 - Mindful Reviews
    4:26 - Context
    5:56 - Price
    6:51 - Weight
    7:34 - Length
    8:02 - Origin
    9:22 - FOV
    10:31 - Glass Quality
    12:35 - Light Transmission
    14:11 - Breakdown
    20:37 - Recommendations
    Robby Denning SFL 10x40 Review
    www.rokslide.com/zeiss-sfl-10...
    Other Zeiss SFL Reviews
    • NEW Zeiss SFL Binoculars
    • Zeiss SFL Binoculars R...
    Jay Nichol
    jay@mindfulhunter.com
    www.mindful-reviews.com/
    www.mindfulhunter.com/
    Merch
    www.mindfulhunter.com/shop
    Newsletter
    www.mindfulhunter.com/contact
    IG
    / mindful_hunter
    Podcast
    www.mindfulhunter.com/podcast
    Free Backcountry Nutrition Guide
    www.mindfulhunter.com/tools
  • บันเทิง

ความคิดเห็น • 78

  • @bengenz4581
    @bengenz4581 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks for another great review Jay!!

    • @MindfulHunter
      @MindfulHunter  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      My pleasure man!

  • @13hawks32claws
    @13hawks32claws 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks for all the great info. Constantly killing the review game. 💪🏼

  • @Andyram_18
    @Andyram_18 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Love the reviews man! Specific, picky, honest… good combination. Fresh breath of air from the influencers! Keep up the good work!

    • @MindfulHunter
      @MindfulHunter  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you brother!

  • @golfnolsen
    @golfnolsen 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great review! thanks for throwing that Swaro EL comment in at the end.

  • @vancejohnson1778
    @vancejohnson1778 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Bad ass review man! Sweet looking binos, nice to see they fill that hole for a more mid range but high quality bino 👌

  • @Dmitry_GBR
    @Dmitry_GBR 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you very much for the impartial and informative video. Very much appreciated, wanted to say huge thank you.

  • @chaserush91
    @chaserush91 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I've had these for 6 months. They're super light weight, you'll forget their in your harness. You can glass with one hand easily with these, which is awesome for archery. The edge to edge clarity is way better than any top end vortex and it makes glassing animals a lot easier. You catch so much movement in these binos it's crazy. The focus wheel is awesome you can go from far to close within one turn. Super crisp.
    These are killer. Definitely a western hunters dream

  • @actionman1276
    @actionman1276 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    very good review, thank you a lot

  • @walkachu
    @walkachu 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Thanks for the great review!
    I've been using the SF 10x42 for years, and I just got a pair of SFL 10x40's... for the money, the SFL's definitely hit above their weight! They're my new go-to pair👍🏻

    • @MindfulHunter
      @MindfulHunter  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Agreed!

    • @GM-bq6zo
      @GM-bq6zo 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Are your sfls near the performance of your SF's?

    • @MindfulHunter
      @MindfulHunter  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@GM-bq6zo yes. If weight was the priority I’d go SFL. I’m considering switching to the SFL’s for all my archery hunts from my NL Pures. They hand hold SO good.

    • @GM-bq6zo
      @GM-bq6zo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@MindfulHunter thanks a lot, would u say the extra weight of the 42mm swaro el is not worth it over the Sfl?

    • @MindfulHunter
      @MindfulHunter  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@GM-bq6zo there is no unicorn. If you want the extra optical clarity you carry extra weight. That’s up to you.

  • @mikerobinson6606
    @mikerobinson6606 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Great review. You stuck some interesting points on a few different topics.....now I'm on the fence between 15X and 18X for my next pair of Binoculars. I'm getting away from Spotters completely. I can't get comfortable behind them anymore. Could just be the setup more than the glass but I really like running big Binoculars on the tripod.

    • @MindfulHunter
      @MindfulHunter  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It’s a very effective strategy for sure.

  • @Rokslide
    @Rokslide 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    All right Jay! Great review. Between you and Robby, probably the most thorough review on a single bino out there. Really liked the comparison of the other models price points vs. performance. We pay a lot for small differences and you just gave many reasons to keep some cash in a guy's pocket but still have a more-than-good-enough optic.

    • @MindfulHunter
      @MindfulHunter  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Appreciate the feedback. I’d argue it’s the best value for price bino on the market right now.

  • @generaltso9402
    @generaltso9402 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I have the 8x40s and have the same opinion 95% or more of the performance of the NLs at 55% of the price. They are my everyday bin for birding, the NLs hang on my wall for special occasions.

  • @weekendwarrior8334
    @weekendwarrior8334 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great vid. Those Zeiss SFLs are impressive. While the NL Pure are amazing binos I could not justify spending that type of coin on binos. I picked up a pair of Swarovski ELs for $1600 after tax and I could not be happier with them.

    • @MindfulHunter
      @MindfulHunter  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Those EL’s have been a steal since they dropped the price.

  • @johnnyroese
    @johnnyroese 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I love my SFL 8x40’s but heads up I actually had to send back the first pair I purchased because there was a small defect inside one of the objective lenses, so definitely look over thoroughly out of the box cause QC issues can happen with them

    • @MindfulHunter
      @MindfulHunter  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Good to know. Thanks.

  • @hawaiianhunter
    @hawaiianhunter 29 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Thanks for your work , much appreciated. I torn between the sfl 8x40 and the sf 8x42. 😩. The price gap!

  • @GM-bq6zo
    @GM-bq6zo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Sorry for all the messages lol, did u pick up any 8x40 SFL's as you mentioned in this video? If so how are the 8's?

  • @dezscott46
    @dezscott46 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    great review there as always been something nice about top end Zeiss binoculars .Weight is imported as you get older. My go to are my NL pure 8x42 having said that if i know im doing a lot of walking its the zeiss sf 8x42 . You may think theres not much in it but when there round your neck all day with the rest of your gear on your back you can really tell.
    Just a shame there not made in Germany only time will tell on there quality this is from a Birder not a hunter who goes out in all weather and has had his bins caked in mud and has to wash them in open water only this is a true test of how good they are facts on paper mean nothing when the lens are covered in mud and water .Trust when im back home they get a good wash but very rarely do i clean the lens with a cloth just use running water and perhaps my finger and there as good as new again .

    • @MindfulHunter
      @MindfulHunter  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Appreciate the feedback and info!

  • @fritzd2116
    @fritzd2116 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I’ve been hoping you would get a chance to review the SFL from Zeiss?
    My chest harness bino is the Swarovski 10x50 EL which I love but at 35 oz can seem heavy at times?
    Been very intrigued by the SFL, especially the 8x40? And 22 oz? Wow!

    • @MindfulHunter
      @MindfulHunter  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yeah man. Super useful piece of gear.

  • @GM-bq6zo
    @GM-bq6zo 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What's your opinion on the focus wheel? It looks a bit lower down than it should be, Like it should be a bit nearer the eye cups? Looks bit more awkward to use your first finger?
    Also if kowa use pure flouride glass are they the best image?

    • @MindfulHunter
      @MindfulHunter  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I find more companies are moving the focus wheel forward. Feels quite comfortable and I think it balances better contributing to less handshake. I would argue Kowa glass is 1-3% better than the big three. Pretty subjective opinion on that one.

    • @GM-bq6zo
      @GM-bq6zo 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MindfulHunter kowa are great, it's surprising more people don't use the genesis range.

  • @fisherofmenmatt4194
    @fisherofmenmatt4194 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    What sold me on the EL was that it is a direct competitor to the Noctovid and VICTORY SF yet I’ve have seen it go on sale three times this year for $2000 almost $900-$1000 less than it’s direct competitor

    • @MindfulHunter
      @MindfulHunter  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      There is no question the EL has superior glass to the SFL. The question is whether the weight and size savings offset the optical performance. Basically the age old question with all glass. EL’s are a steal at current prices.

    • @GM-bq6zo
      @GM-bq6zo 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I actually prefer the look of the Els to the nl pure.

  • @sonicsaviouryouwillnotgetm6678
    @sonicsaviouryouwillnotgetm6678 23 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    The 8x40 works well with spectacles, too. That was a deciding factor for me

  • @tianl98765
    @tianl98765 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I want to mention that I received a pair of the SFL that had an eye extender issue, one of the common issues for the conquest. So I kinda suspect that is from the same manufacturer

  • @brettgilchrist9482
    @brettgilchrist9482 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I am finding 8.5x42 EL (2010 vintage) for $1400 on the used market. Given the choice, those or SFL's for hunting in the PNW?

    • @MindfulHunter
      @MindfulHunter  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Depends how old they are. New EL’s have come way down.

    • @brettgilchrist9482
      @brettgilchrist9482 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      So, if you had to choose... new EL's or new SFL's both in 10x, assuming they are within a couple hundred from each other. I currently use Tract Torics and 8x30 SLC's. Odds are good I will stand pat, but I really enjoyed your video. I hunt wilderness, am 64 yrs old and hence I like light weight gear.

    • @MindfulHunter
      @MindfulHunter  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@brettgilchrist9482 if weights a priority go SFL. They’re 6oz lighter. The EL are slightly superior optically though. I’d say 4-6% if I had to pick a number.

    • @jacobmiranda5987
      @jacobmiranda5987 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@brettgilchrist9482 I personally own ELs 8.5x42 and think they’re great, and got them for about $1600. Ive been going back and fourth on getting the SLFs as a back up pair because the ELs are a bit heavy. The SLFs have fantastic image quality, and they’re really not that much worse than the ELs. Honestly, besides the weight, I have been really disappointed in the quality of the rubber coating on the ELs, and have had mine tapped for a while waiting to send them in to get fixed.

  • @mrh9635
    @mrh9635 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The 8/10x30 sfls seem designed to compete with the Swarovski CL Companions 8/10x30. I got the Companions recently as my first expensive binocular so it would be interesting to put them side by side. In fact, I don't think anyone has done a decent, thorough breakdown of the Swaro Companions so far.

    • @MindfulHunter
      @MindfulHunter  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It’s a good point!

    • @mrh9635
      @mrh9635 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MindfulHunter I think lots of people who want high end but aren't quite ready to go to the £$2000 bracket will have their eye on those two, as I was.

  • @patrickscheel3943
    @patrickscheel3943 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Try those image stabilizing binos bud!! Total game changers

    • @MindfulHunter
      @MindfulHunter  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Got some on the way!

  • @tianl98765
    @tianl98765 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    For the price, sometimes SF 8x32 goes on sale at about 1900, which would be about the same price as these..

  • @jn1083
    @jn1083 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Did you notice much chromatic aberration in sfl? I can’t live with CA.

  • @s.d.r1062
    @s.d.r1062 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    But for low light 42 mm vs 40 is also better by SF i think

    • @MindfulHunter
      @MindfulHunter  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      🤷🏼‍♂️

    • @s.d.r1062
      @s.d.r1062 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@MindfulHunter do you think its a big difference?

    • @s.d.r1062
      @s.d.r1062 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@MindfulHunter What to you mean?

  • @swiftusmaximus5651
    @swiftusmaximus5651 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I didnt realize these were made in Japan. Theyre $300 overpriced. $1800 for a Japanese Compact ? Ouch

  • @vikinona
    @vikinona 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hello. I have Swarovski EL 10x42 Swarovizion but I am disappointed.. The image is sharp from edge to edge, but the actual sharpness is only average. Before that I had a Zeiss Conquest and that was brighter and sharper than the EL. And then I also had a Zeiss Victory SF and that was the sharpest scope I've ever seen. The Swarovski ELs are not sharp binoculars. I have a Bushnell Nitro 10x36 and sharper in the center of the field of view than EL Swarovski..

    • @MindfulHunter
      @MindfulHunter  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      👍

    • @mrmaxaxl
      @mrmaxaxl 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I dunno how your Swarovski El is but mine is definitely super sharp!
      I have the Conquest 8x32 HD as well. And I agree they are super sharp in the middle.
      However no where near as shart at the edges as the El.
      But; the El's are also heavy and bulky.
      My go to binos are the SFL's.
      The El's I only use when I have a tripod with me.

    • @vikinona
      @vikinona 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@mrmaxaxl I now have a Zeiss Victory SF 10x42. Swarovski EL has completely neutral colors that are already almost dull and completely sharp from edge to edge, but the image through El did not have a high resolution. SF has a yellow-green tinted image, but it has an amazing sharpness that I have never seen in EL.. But I know many cheap binoculars that are as sharp as EL but only in the center of the field of view, but overall EL has a much higher image quality. The EL has a very bad central focus wheel but it has very high quality metal eyecups and it's the exact opposite of the SF. The SF has a very high quality central wheel but lower quality artificial eyecups. Both are excellent binoculars, it depends who prefers what.. Sharpness in the entire field of view or higher sharpness in the center.

  • @swiftusmaximus5651
    @swiftusmaximus5651 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    LMAO, who carries two pairs of Binos and a Spotter while Hunting?

    • @MindfulHunter
      @MindfulHunter  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Tons of folks. Ever been to Arizona?

    • @swiftusmaximus5651
      @swiftusmaximus5651 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MindfulHunterI guess your in better shape then i am