Chrysler’s 1934 Airflow revolutionized car aerodynamics-our wind-tunnel tests prove it | Driving.ca

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ก.ค. 2023
  • #ChryslerAirflow #windtunnel #aerodynamics
    Barn door. Brick wall. Whatever metaphor you use, cars at the turn of the twentieth century were simply not that streamlined. With narrow, upright grilles; flat plate-glass windshields; and bodywork that ballooned out at the back, automobiles of the 1910s, ’20s, and early ’30s were, aerodynamically speaking, a real drag. The “horseless carriages” of those decades were, however, making more and more power every year, propelling them to speeds where, unlike their draft-animal-drawn forebears, their slipperiness-through-the-air had an impact.
    Walter P. Chrysler and the engineers at Chrysler Corporation understood that perhaps sooner than anyone in the American auto industry. In the late ’20s, the fledgling automaker conscripted famed aviator Orville Wright to build a small-scale wind tunnel to test cars’ aerodynamics. Those tests led Chrysler to develop a radical new model, the Airflow, designed around fluid-dynamics principles, and marketed via scientifically derived claims that contemporary cars’ styling was so backwards, many were more streamlined driving in reverse than forward.
    The Airflow’s story has been told a hundred times, and Chrysler engineers’ data from the period repeated endlessly. But how would their figures compare to ones measured at a modern state-of-the-art facility, like the ACE Climatic Wind Tunnel at Ontario Tech University in Oshawa? Driving.ca decided to find out firsthand, testing the revolutionary 1934 Chrysler Airflow, as well as a conventional 1932 DeSoto sedan, using some of the most advanced equipment available today. Here’s what we learned.
    Read the full article on Driving.ca: driving.ca/feature/1934-chrys...
    ____________________________________
    Be sure to SUBSCRIBE to our channel to keep you in the loop on all things automotive, whether it's breaking news, a new review or the latest hard-hitting column - by our roster of trusted, talented and award-winning automotive journalists.
    For more Car Reviews: driving.ca/category/reviews/
    For more Car News: driving.ca/category/auto-news/
    For Canadian Car Pricing, Vehicle Specs, Expert Reviews, Models Compare Tool and more: driving.ca/find-compare/
    ____________________________________
    Would you like to subscribe to our Blind-Spot Monitor NEWSLETTERS to catch up on all the top automotive stories of the week. Delivered on Wednesdays and Saturdays. It's free and it takes seconds to sign up. Sign Up Now: driving.ca/newsletters/
    FOLLOW US
    Twitter: / drivingdotca
    Facebook: /
    Instagram: /
    ABOUT DRIVING.CA
    Driving.ca is the leading online destination for the latest car news and all things automotive related for Canadians. Driving’s team of award-winning auto journalists publishes original, fresh and breaking content about cars, SUVs, pickup trucks, electric vehicles and more, and is enjoyed by almost 2 million Canadians every week in print, online, on smartphones and tablets. Whether you’re a shopper researching your next vehicle, or someone who loves cars, Driving is your source for everything automotive.
    For general advertising inquiries, contact us via email at advertising@driving.ca.
    #prewarcars #OntarioTechUniversityACE
  • ยานยนต์และพาหนะ

ความคิดเห็น • 19

  • @johnbehneman1546
    @johnbehneman1546 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    THANK YOU TO EVERYONE INVOLVED IN THIS PROJECT. I LOVE THE CHRYSLER AIR FLOW. I WOULD LOVE TO BUILD ONE IN THE FUTURE.

  • @sgrant9814
    @sgrant9814 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Why are we not given the drag coefficient numbers? That would have made the video far more interesting

  • @ClassicChrome86
    @ClassicChrome86 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Great information. The Airflow was definitely a car ahead of it's time. Thanks for sharing.

  • @thenov1944
    @thenov1944 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great Looking Chrysler ! ! !

  • @youtube-handle-are-a-joke
    @youtube-handle-are-a-joke 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Peugeot did copied the design of the Airflow for their 202, 302, 402 and 602 and the cars sold fairly well for a number of years in France starting in 1935. Tatra did too.

  • @chuckotto7021
    @chuckotto7021 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    How about comparing the Airflow to the Lincoln Zephyr?

  • @sanjeevpereira8141
    @sanjeevpereira8141 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Great vedio

  • @DaBoogie049
    @DaBoogie049 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    One cool production!

  • @timkis64
    @timkis64 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    i've often wondered how the big late 50s early 60s jet age cars did with the big fins & such did in a cd score.probably not to great.

  • @marcelomoura8655
    @marcelomoura8655 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Chrysler Airflow foi o carro certo no momento errado. Muito à frente de seu tempo.

  • @brianandglendaharkin9457
    @brianandglendaharkin9457 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    MOPAR old school 👍🏻🇦🇺

  • @johnjackson8401
    @johnjackson8401 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Was the Chrysler Airflow the inspiration for Ferdinand Porsche in creating the VW Type 1 (Beetle) in 1937?

    • @mrdanforth3744
      @mrdanforth3744 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No doubt he was aware of the Airflow as he kept up with the latest trends in design. But the beetle was much more like the rear engine Lincoln Zephyr prototype designed by John Tjaarda that was shown in car shows starting in 1934.

    • @maximlovkov
      @maximlovkov 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No, it was tatra

  • @fk4515
    @fk4515 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I almost wonder if the lower numbers you measured not meeting Chrysler's claims wasn't because of better measuring techniques and overall advancement in the knowledge of aerodynamics?

    • @mrdanforth3744
      @mrdanforth3744 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I suspect if you took off the license plates and rear view mirrors and just tested the body shape it would look better. There is also the fact that Chrysler tested wooden model shapes in a 3X2 foot wind tunnel so would not get the same effect as a full size car.

  • @SpockvsMcCoy
    @SpockvsMcCoy 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Automotive aerodynamics are only significantly practical at speeds above 45 mph. However, in the mid-1930s there were no high-speed roads like today. In fact, the typical country road for traveling long distance at that time was winding, heavily crowned, and two-way. Approximately 50 mph was as fast as a driver could safely operate a car on those roads. Thus, the highly aerodynamic Airflow/Airstream cars from Chrysler Corporation did not have a practical purpose. Instead, what buyers at that time found more desirable was a comfortable ride. The similarly styled aerodynamic DeSoto was even less popular than the Chrysler Airflow. Planned, but never produced, Dodge and Plymouth models of similar aerodynamic design would have been so unpopular that Chrysler Corporation would have probably gone bankrupt. As a result of poor sales, all Chrysler Corporation's models had ultraconservative design until Virgil Exner's popular 1955 Forward Look models. The most dumpy/dull looking models of the conservative era were the 1937/1938 models ("potato era") and 1949/1950 models (stubby boxlike).

  • @8176morgan
    @8176morgan 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    "Walter P. Chrysler stood by the Airflow even decades later." 9:51. Unfortunately Walter P. Chrysler died in the year 1940!