Both of them are weird, but I've never heard the statement 'I tried to pay them' and it was legit. The plaintiff is really ridiculous because she really kept refusing the money!
@@Mikeprocurator Accepting partial payment isn't settling for less. A settlement requires both parties to agree beforehand to settle. If I owe you $500 and send you $300, I can't unilaterally claim that you settled for only that $300.
The plaintiff is a weirdo for not opening her mail. And the defendant is ridiculous saying “she didn’t work for the company, there’s a protocol…”. There is such thing as contract work. If you ask for a service and agree to pay, then thats a contract.
I think what the defendant is saying is the service she asked for was staging. Anything after that, like sitting behind the booth and arranging lights occasionally, was not agreed 'work' that she actually contracted. Because if she wanted work, she wouldn't have done it by contracting it, she would have gone through with the protocol she mentioned.
Seem as though the plaintiff was hired to do staging, only. Then inserted herself to work in woman’s business. Kinda like, the person at the gas station, who just automatically begins to wash your windows.🫤
Her whole story was like that, so I don’t know why the judge kept believing her. Like with the plates, she admitted that she saw them and decided to buy them, which was not something the defendant asked her to do. So I don’t know why the judge let her her throw that charge on when it wasn’t even in the plaintiff’s original invoice.
Story time: My mother owned a hair salon for 23 years and this lady would come in my moms salon with her own broom and start sweeping, cleaning the windows and collecting the trash, she was always okay with just $10. Until one day she demand $50 and wouldn't leave until she got paid...my mom paid then got a restraining order 🤣🤣🤣🤣 anyways I feel like the plaintiff did the same thing to the defendant.
@@lukerinderknecht2982I disagree. The plaintiff was trying to drag her job out more than what they initially agreed. The defendant tried to pay her so it's the plaintiff that comes out looking goofy.
I don’t know why the judge kept being nasty to the defendant, she would barely let her explain at all, and she was right about trying to pay her. Also, its totally believable that the plaintiff kept inserting herself at the booth. That’s a lot to charge for one event, and those farmer’s market style booths/product vendors only make so much per event.
They’re both insane. Something about the Plaintiff is off. Why would you refuse the package thinking she would “put something in it”? That sound paranoid and delusional. Maybe she refused the original check too, and that’s why it wasn’t delivered. Something isn’t going to the top floor for her. The Plaintiff seems a bit deranged. The Defendant also needs to learn how to run her business: sign contracts even for freelancers, agree to a payment before contracting anybody, and follow the contract. You can’t change the amount of a payment just because you’re mad. These two need to find something else to do with their time beside play games.
Nah in a weird way I get her. If I'm having problems with this lady after thinking she's shafting me and then a weird looking box shows up on my door I aint taking it either. What is the lady going to do put a check alone in a big ass box? Nah so I would think its weird too " like what's in there she's trying to send me"
I think her problem was that the box wasn’t sealed. If she accepted the open box and it didn’t contain a cheque, then the defendant could claim the cheque was in the box and the plaintiff had accepted it. The plaintiff just didn’t want to risk accepting an opened box when she was expecting a cheque.
😂😂😂 “small business” and then all of a sudden she’s acting like she runs a whole grocery store with protocols😂 interviews and drug tests 😂 just to stage an area?😂 like what?😂
The plaintiff's attitude shows this is not the first time she has strong armed her way into a paycheck. The defendant should've never let her get comfortable in her business enough to state her wages like that.
She should definitely get paid for her staging but the whole “I worked in her booth at an hourly wage” seems off to me. I’m willing to bet she just fondled around in the booth being overzealous instead of staying in her lane and now wants to run the defendants pockets for a bit more cash
Yeah, that’s what I do when I want money. Go waste my whole day at an event serving at a particular booth and then hope they pay me. So much easier than actually finding a paying job 🙃
@@redapol5678 I wouldn't rule out the plaintiff wanting to attend the event for exposure (as the defendant explained), then hung around the booth "to learn" and self-classified that as working.
@@al3220 yeah, because that’s what I would do too rather than finding another staging job that actually pays me 🙃 Besides which, if the defendant was such a good business person as she says, she wouldn’t allow the plaintiff to attend an event and hang around her booth the whole day as if she were actually working. That’s just asking for trouble
“I can’t believe she’s trying to screw me out of $110 more, but I’m a business person so I’m going to send it to her.” I know what she means, that she just wants to get rid of a problem, but those two sentences back to back do NOT sound like a business person. 😂
The condition that the box showed up in could have had everything to do with how it was handled by the postal staff, and nothing at all to do with the condition that it was in when it left the defendant’s home. The plaintiff is definitely an odd bird.
no 💩@@nettyspeaks . You think people sit around all day and watch them? Is there in fine script a statement that states that the general populace is supposed to learn and make the information obtained actionable? Sheesh....
@@annereidy7981, The agreement was a flat fee of $200 American. She comes to court claiming she was supposed to receive $11 American per hour. Even Marilyn saw that
I absolutely hate when Judge Milian asked who's going to pay her for her wasted time or her troubles! It's like are you kidding me? you most definitely are being paid for wasted time and your troubles, and she gets paid a lot of money for the show! I get that she's kind of saying it as a joke but it's a stupid joke.
tbh, everyone that has ever worked customer service has thought exactly like the Judge. At some point, a customer is just using up more than their fair share of your time. I work in the Emergency room and can usually address patient complaints. HOWEVER, when a patient insists on keeping me to complain about something that is unreasonable or beyond my control even after I've explained it once to them, they prevent me from moving to my next patient and thus are wasting my time. So when a patient like this says "you guys are wasting my time" I too am thinking, I dont get paid enough for your bull.
How is the defendant sketchy ? And why was the judge so mean to her versus the very sketchy plaintiff she wasn’t. Also how tf did it go from $210 to $267 when the defendant literally tried to pay her twice why is she punished for it ?
something is really wrong with the plaintiff. didn’t accept the envelope. no way the post office didn’t deliver, she’s a liar. then she doesn’t open the box. WEIRDO !!!!
Be careful when people come to you begging for a job, sometimes they have tricks up their sleeve. She refused payment twice then came to court for an additional $45. 😛
Honestly, this is all I’m thinking. I am always wary of people coming under the guise of “help”, then suddenly getting chummy. Who sent you? The plaintiff knew what she was doing and she probably did it before. The defendant needs to wisen up and not engage any individuals or companies without serious thought and an airtight contract. That lady could’ve come for her entire business in court!
You can tell the plaintiff was lying. She tossed her hair everytime. Doug said she's stupid then told her congratulations. I'm sure it was not for winning the case 😂
The plaintiff used the words payroll closed not the defendant and was sent a check for her services but claimed she never received it....she is setting stuff up in a booth so $100 sounds right after hearing the work she did and I believe the defendant sent more money than she agreed to just to get rid of that woman and since she was paying more than agreed she can take off $50 because Karen will not shut up!.....she's dressing up a tent not performing life saving surgery.
@@thenatural5268 you go to work and your job tells you “hey by the way we went over budget we can’t give you your check until next month” you’re telling that’s okay cuz they went over budget? 💀😂😂
7:31 I hate when she says this. Because she does get paid for her waste of time. By the People's Court! She's literally getting paid for her wasted time as she saying "when do I get paid for my wasted time"? 🤦🏻♂️
No matter how wrong the plaintiff or the defendants are you should never call them stupid. Very unprofessional for doug to say that part at the end. I used to like him but that was uncalled for.
I agree. I can't stand him. He reminds me of every old man I meet that thinks they can say whatever they want because they're old so 'naturally' I we owe them 🥴
...? The end interviews aren't really meant to be very professional. He'll insult them, try to rile them up, comment on their tattoos, etc. It's just for our entertainment at the end essentially.
Both are stubborn but the Plaintiff really came across as a fool. " I wasn't waiting for a box..bla bla blabitty blablabla" I guess she just wanted to be on TV. But Doug had to go there with his "Well a lot of people are thinking you're kind of stupid" comment 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Cold-blooded!
You are not an employee if you do not complete an I-9 Form. If you are a 1099 employee, you need a W-9. Plaintiff should have shown companies operation manual. Along with proof she follows practice for all hiring transaction. I think the woman assumed she was working for her. This has happened to me on more than one occasion. I removed them from the event.
If she didn't hire the plaintiff to work the booth b/c she's not an employee, but she took it upon herself to work the booth anyway, then she just volunteered... I'm not paying someone to do work I never agreed for them to do. Sounds like she should've only been paid for the staging they agreed to, and it's nonsensical that neither of them thought it was worth putting in writing what they agreed to.
Plaintiff is a weirdo and I believe 100% inserted herself into the business of that day. Those farmers markets don’t make much money so it wouldn’t make sense to offer to pay someone to hang around when u already have 3 other people working. Defendant didn’t set boundaries and should have sent that lady about her business. Judge was being a real b… to the defendant for no reason and would not let her speak to explain herself. She can be extremely rude and unfair at times. Judge picks and chooses when she wants to enforce unconfirmed contracts and agreements.
The judge is biased against blacks and that is in every court system but the defendant screwed herself with showing a check made out for 210 even if it was extortion. What the defendant should have said, is brought the proof that she had three people at the event working and then ask what purpose would it serve hiring someone who was there to do staging as one of her crew at an event that is not super busy and someone without proper knowledge of the product who was again there for providing staging. She is a swindler ie a hustler and jack of whatever trade and that is how the defendant should have described her. She should have made it clear that at what point do some random woman approach her about staging then it goes from her doing a staging to becoming someone who is working in the business which is bongos ... I have seen this is other places where people show up to do a specific job then volunteer to do something else they see, then after they finish want to be paid for what they volunteered to do claiming they were being nice
Plaintiff said envelope with check was right address but she never received it. My guess is that it was delivered to wrong address and sent back and post office never tried to redeliver it.
@billmoran3219 ive wored in billing and what happened with that check happens a lot. Some of these mail carries are lazy and if they are substituting for another route they will just mark the mail undeliverable. It sad actually. I once had a bill returned marked undeliverable that was addressed to the post office itself because they had our services.
I don't blame the plaintiff for not accepting box. She's right. I wouldn't have trusted the defendant either. Just send the check. Excuse by defendant, She's not an employee". No 💩 Sherlock, plaintiff never claimed to be😠
The plaintiff is an opportunist and the defendant needs to make things very plain . I don’t play games with people , literally send a text to confirm stuff a forehand . Maybe it’s because I’m a graduate in law , or maybe it’s because I have Anxiety. Either way I just operate differently ❤
![NISAMANEE - TADA (ท้าดา) [ OFFICIAL MV ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/hcQHEPMmJpU/mqdefault.jpg)
Both are goofy. I fully believe the plaintiff just inserted herself into the defendant’s business.
BINGO
Yes, how did she go from a staging advisor to an employee? The plaintiff is a little bit.... nutty.
Meeeee tooooooo!!!!!!!
“Well a lot of people are thinking that you’re kinda stupid” Doug is hilarious 😂
He's so shady lol 😂
I died😂
I laughed out loud when he said that… I love that he just says what he thinking! 😆
He wrong
Yeah he's an ignorant old man
Both of them are weird, but I've never heard the statement 'I tried to pay them' and it was legit. The plaintiff is really ridiculous because she really kept refusing the money!
Twice!
It wasn’t the right amount of money anyways, if she took it it would have been settling for less. They’re both crazy
@@Mikeprocuratorhow would she have know that , at the 1st attempt at payment? It was sent via mail in a sealed envelope
@@Mikeprocurator Accepting partial payment isn't settling for less. A settlement requires both parties to agree beforehand to settle. If I owe you $500 and send you $300, I can't unilaterally claim that you settled for only that $300.
How did she keep refusing the money? She never received the letter. And the box was too suspicious to accept.
That's what I'm going to start telling people when they ask to borrow money: "My payroll is closed".
😂
👍🏿
Me too!!! 😂😂😂
@@eumekamathis1712 😅😅😅😅
☠️☠️☠️☠️
The plaintiff is a weirdo for not opening her mail. And the defendant is ridiculous saying “she didn’t work for the company, there’s a protocol…”. There is such thing as contract work. If you ask for a service and agree to pay, then thats a contract.
Right!!
I think what the defendant is saying is the service she asked for was staging. Anything after that, like sitting behind the booth and arranging lights occasionally, was not agreed 'work' that she actually contracted. Because if she wanted work, she wouldn't have done it by contracting it, she would have gone through with the protocol she mentioned.
@@adeanelson3201Righttt!!! Like how did people not get that!!!
Seem as though the plaintiff was hired to do staging, only. Then inserted herself to work in woman’s business. Kinda like, the person at the gas station, who just automatically begins to wash your windows.🫤
The defendant only asked for staging, nothing more.
Did anyone else catch how the plaintiff said "I've never refused any mail"? A few minutes later "I refused the 2nd box" 🤔
Her whole story was like that, so I don’t know why the judge kept believing her. Like with the plates, she admitted that she saw them and decided to buy them, which was not something the defendant asked her to do. So I don’t know why the judge let her her throw that charge on when it wasn’t even in the plaintiff’s original invoice.
Story time:
My mother owned a hair salon for 23 years and this lady would come in my moms salon with her own broom and start sweeping, cleaning the windows and collecting the trash, she was always okay with just $10. Until one day she demand $50 and wouldn't leave until she got paid...my mom paid then got a restraining order 🤣🤣🤣🤣 anyways I feel like the plaintiff did the same thing to the defendant.
Wow! The cleaning lady may have had some mental issues!
I agree totally!
What the hell?!
It looks like it
Do you still have that cleaning lady number I have a warehouse that needs to be clean I'll pay a 50 bucks
the woman sent the cheque. case closed. Judge is cranky. The defendant was a bit unfairly treated I feel.
I agree. She was constantly interrupted and unfairly disbelieved.
Doug is a wild boy 😂😂😂. I can't....... he called that lady stupid to her face.
What I gotta do to be able to do that no repercussions?
Become an old white dude with a microphone 😅
Lol! Doug want to be a comedian so bad
Doug wouldn't say that to a dude. He knows that one swing and it's over
@@danielchitown9339you must be new here cuz yes he would
You gotta be Doug!
It looks like the plaintiff imposed herself on the defendant and the defendant was too nice to set boundaries
I agree 100000%
exactly, but I bet she learned!
The plaintiff took advantage of the defendant's kindness
😂😂😂 he took the opportunity to call her what we were all thinking “STUPID” I love that man
I don't trust the plaintiff. If you work as staging, why are you even asking for an hourly job behind my booth?
I don’t trust either of them.
The plaintiff may offer some weird services, but her story has been a lot more cohesive than the defendant's.
@@lukerinderknecht2982by leaps and bounds !
But it's normal to just want to "hang out" at a booth and not be there to work for the person you're working for... sure
@@lukerinderknecht2982I disagree. The plaintiff was trying to drag her job out more than what they initially agreed. The defendant tried to pay her so it's the plaintiff that comes out looking goofy.
My man said we think you're kind of stupid 😂😂😂 What a boss!! Lengend.
Bahaha 🤯🤣 they can think all they want
I don’t know why the judge kept being nasty to the defendant, she would barely let her explain at all, and she was right about trying to pay her. Also, its totally believable that the plaintiff kept inserting herself at the booth. That’s a lot to charge for one event, and those farmer’s market style booths/product vendors only make so much per event.
Agreed!
Yea she was doing the most. Sometimes she be in bully mode with certain people, even if they winning.
Exactly
Exactly
She talks like that to African Americans all da time , it’s kinda the reason why I don’t watch her anymore..
"a lot of people are thinking you are kinda stupid" 😂
They’re both insane. Something about the Plaintiff is off. Why would you refuse the package thinking she would “put something in it”? That sound paranoid and delusional. Maybe she refused the original check too, and that’s why it wasn’t delivered. Something isn’t going to the top floor for her. The Plaintiff seems a bit deranged. The Defendant also needs to learn how to run her business: sign contracts even for freelancers, agree to a payment before contracting anybody, and follow the contract. You can’t change the amount of a payment just because you’re mad. These two need to find something else to do with their time beside play games.
Yep. Lots of oddities on this one.
Nah in a weird way I get her. If I'm having problems with this lady after thinking she's shafting me and then a weird looking box shows up on my door I aint taking it either. What is the lady going to do put a check alone in a big ass box? Nah so I would think its weird too " like what's in there she's trying to send me"
I think her problem was that the box wasn’t sealed. If she accepted the open box and it didn’t contain a cheque, then the defendant could claim the cheque was in the box and the plaintiff had accepted it. The plaintiff just didn’t want to risk accepting an opened box when she was expecting a cheque.
@@redapol5678 huh huh cheque. But also..Good point:)
@@shelberz1 it’s the non-American spelling 😉
😂😂😂 “small business” and then all of a sudden she’s acting like she runs a whole grocery store with protocols😂 interviews and drug tests 😂 just to stage an area?😂 like what?😂
She's talking about her small business of preparing food. I wouldn't hire druggies either!
I wouldn't hire drug users either, small business or not. 🤷🏽♀️
The plaintiff's attitude shows this is not the first time she has strong armed her way into a paycheck. The defendant should've never let her get comfortable in her business enough to state her wages like that.
the just KEEPS interrupting the defendant every time she speaks but is allowing the plaintiff to talk continuously
She should definitely get paid for her staging but the whole “I worked in her booth at an hourly wage” seems off to me. I’m willing to bet she just fondled around in the booth being overzealous instead of staying in her lane and now wants to run the defendants pockets for a bit more cash
Yeah, that’s what I do when I want money. Go waste my whole day at an event serving at a particular booth and then hope they pay me. So much easier than actually finding a paying job 🙃
@@redapol5678 I wouldn't rule out the plaintiff wanting to attend the event for exposure (as the defendant explained), then hung around the booth "to learn" and self-classified that as working.
@@al3220 yeah, because that’s what I would do too rather than finding another staging job that actually pays me 🙃 Besides which, if the defendant was such a good business person as she says, she wouldn’t allow the plaintiff to attend an event and hang around her booth the whole day as if she were actually working. That’s just asking for trouble
“I can’t believe she’s trying to screw me out of $110 more, but I’m a business person so I’m going to send it to her.”
I know what she means, that she just wants to get rid of a problem, but those two sentences back to back do NOT sound like a business person. 😂
They both messed up! Make sure you always get a contract (including on temporary work)! The plaintiff did too much & the defendant did too little!!
The condition that the box showed up in could have had everything to do with how it was handled by the postal staff, and nothing at all to do with the condition that it was in when it left the defendant’s home. The plaintiff is definitely an odd bird.
I feel like the lady is a swindler but I'm tired of adults not knowing how to defend themselves. Have some back bone. Educate yourself about court.
Not everyone is going to court and not everyone is dealing with weirdos like the plantiff.
Thank you!
@@MM-sz6ku court shows are not new
no 💩@@nettyspeaks . You think people sit around all day and watch them? Is there in fine script a statement that states that the general populace is supposed to learn and make the information obtained actionable? Sheesh....
How did the defendant come up with the excuse that the plaintiff hadn't gone through her "protocol" for new hires?
The plaintiff was not an employee. She free lances. She was trying to cheat the defendant
@@manthony777defendant sending the first check of $210 indicates otherwise.
@@manthony777how was she trying to cheat the defendant?
@@claypartridge7553,
Obviously you don't know what freelance means
@@annereidy7981,
The agreement was a flat fee of $200 American. She comes to court claiming she was supposed to receive $11 American per hour. Even Marilyn saw that
There was a staging agreement not a work agreement.
Judge seems like she’s in her mood with the defendant
Doug is a wild boy. Would love to see how he handles political debates.
Yes!
He would be the best! I feel like he would let both sides have it and make sense of their nonsense 😂
ME TO
That is the BEST idea I’ve ever heard. Someone needs to make it happen.
That’s so stupid. She could’ve gotten her money a long time ago
"She lost $60 because of the way she spoke to me." WTF 😂
😂😂😂 If that was legal a lot of people would definitely lose out!!!
She's being cheap cause she is broke. Girl you know you owe. Pay the lady!
But she did… she sent payments twice
@@MBCrusinexactly, lol
checks would have bounced 😀@@MBCrusin
@@Michael-cp6grhad to dock her for being rude.
@@Michael-cp6gr 😬 you’re making this too easy. There’s no way you took that serious.
Doug is a savage😂😂😂😂
I absolutely hate when Judge Milian asked who's going to pay her for her wasted time or her troubles! It's like are you kidding me? you most definitely are being paid for wasted time and your troubles, and she gets paid a lot of money for the show! I get that she's kind of saying it as a joke but it's a stupid joke.
As much as I admire Marilyn, I agree. She's well compensated. Judge Judy also complains and she gets paid even more!
tbh, everyone that has ever worked customer service has thought exactly like the Judge. At some point, a customer is just using up more than their fair share of your time. I work in the Emergency room and can usually address patient complaints. HOWEVER, when a patient insists on keeping me to complain about something that is unreasonable or beyond my control even after I've explained it once to them, they prevent me from moving to my next patient and thus are wasting my time. So when a patient like this says "you guys are wasting my time" I too am thinking, I dont get paid enough for your bull.
Skip Harvey 11:13
Defendant: She didn't take a drug test!
Judge: 🙄
😂😂 I needed that laugh, Doug 🎉
How is the defendant sketchy ? And why was the judge so mean to her versus the very sketchy plaintiff she wasn’t. Also how tf did it go from $210 to $267 when the defendant literally tried to pay her twice why is she punished for it ?
something is really wrong with the plaintiff.
didn’t accept the envelope.
no way the post office didn’t deliver, she’s a liar.
then she doesn’t open the box.
WEIRDO !!!!
Hahaha! Doug doesn't pull any punches. He really let's them have.
Judge Milian please let people talk gheesh. You ask a question then cut them off
Doug throws the best shade!!
Shade? He threw a whole tree at her!
Be careful when people come to you begging for a job, sometimes they have tricks up their sleeve. She refused payment twice then came to court for an additional $45. 😛
Honestly, this is all I’m thinking. I am always wary of people coming under the guise of “help”, then suddenly getting chummy. Who sent you? The plaintiff knew what she was doing and she probably did it before.
The defendant needs to wisen up and not engage any individuals or companies without serious thought and an airtight contract. That lady could’ve come for her entire business in court!
She just should have said NO go away weirdo!! (The defendant to the obnoxious plaintiff)
Doug has no filter omg😭😭😭😭🤣🤣
I agree with her. Waiting for an envelope, but instead a big open box comes instead. I would be skeptical too!
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 Doug is hilarious! He has no filter 😂😂😂😂😂
The plaintiff was only to stage, and then she became an employee, and now gripping the owner was out drinking during the event but dont quit 🤣🤣🤣
You can tell the plaintiff was lying. She tossed her hair everytime.
Doug said she's stupid then told her congratulations. I'm sure it was not for winning the case 😂
The defendant is a cheap liar
I love Doug. His Last words always hit hard!!!😂😂
The plaintiff used the words payroll closed not the defendant and was sent a check for her services but claimed she never received it....she is setting stuff up in a booth so $100 sounds right after hearing the work she did and I believe the defendant sent more money than she agreed to just to get rid of that woman and since she was paying more than agreed she can take off $50 because Karen will not shut up!.....she's dressing up a tent not performing life saving surgery.
Yes! I agree.
I Would not have paid her more. Her ass would have been paying me to get out of my crosshairs.
Yes to all of this.
I found it crazy that she was saying she didn’t have money in September so she couldn’t pay her 💀 like what
She ran over budget and had to delay payment
@@thenatural5268 you go to work and your job tells you “hey by the way we went over budget we can’t give you your check until next month” you’re telling that’s okay cuz they went over budget? 💀😂😂
@@nathang7935 it happens quite often in very small businesses
@@nathang7935It's a good thing you've never worked for a shit employer 😅
Right! She didn't have to hire the stager in the first place so it was crazy that she used the excuse of running over budget.
I am reading this whole trail , and now waiting for Doug’s comment 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Drug testing for a small business that sells honey smh
7:31 I hate when she says this. Because she does get paid for her waste of time. By the People's Court! She's literally getting paid for her wasted time as she saying "when do I get paid for my wasted time"? 🤦🏻♂️
You actually think she doesn't know that? You seriously believe she was being deadass?😂😂😂
Doug at the end: "You know a lot of people think you're stupid?" HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 🤣🤣
Judge Milan needs to let people talk. Lord!
If she did, would probably still be here listening to things that doesn’t matter! 😂
@@shirleywiese5230excactly, the defendant was trying to talk her way out of paying.
I agree! I have noticed that she is constantly yelling and talking over people.
No matter how wrong the plaintiff or the defendants are you should never call them stupid. Very unprofessional for doug to say that part at the end. I used to like him but that was uncalled for.
I thought it was funny and true
It was hilarious 😂
I agree. I can't stand him. He reminds me of every old man I meet that thinks they can say whatever they want because they're old so 'naturally' I we owe them 🥴
...? The end interviews aren't really meant to be very professional. He'll insult them, try to rile them up, comment on their tattoos, etc. It's just for our entertainment at the end essentially.
His viagra didn't work the night before. Poor Ed Doug.
Defendant claims she's a small business and don't have a lot of money, yet she has her people do drug tests, which cost money.
😳😳😳
Business expenses… you people
That's the stupidest point ever! She's selling food products, there are rules.
The defendant is a compulsive liar. She's the type of person that likes to use people.
Kerri is coming off as a Karen in this episode 😮😮
Sounds like someone at the post office went to high-school with her and is doing this.
I think the defendant was being nice... You can't to everybody
How was she being nice? She wants work done but doesn't want to pay.
Both are stubborn but the Plaintiff really came across as a fool. " I wasn't waiting for a box..bla bla blabitty blablabla"
I guess she just wanted to be on TV.
But Doug had to go there with his "Well a lot of people are thinking you're kind of stupid" comment 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Cold-blooded!
Freelance! 😂😂😂 wow honey lady tried it... talking about an employee
""PAYROLL IS CLOSED"" simply means she has run out of money, WTH 😁😁
I'm going to start saying that lmao. "Payroll is closed!"
"okay harvey, what do you think about that?" 😭😭🤣🤣🤣 doug is unbothered AF.
Doug just don't know what to say out the mouth😂😂😂😅😅
Doug don't miss😂
Plaintiff's jewelry is so noisy in the microphone. I do like it though. Lol
You are not an employee if you do not complete an I-9 Form. If you are a 1099 employee, you need a W-9. Plaintiff should have shown companies operation manual. Along with proof she follows practice for all hiring transaction. I think the woman assumed she was working for her. This has happened to me on more than one occasion. I removed them from the event.
The judge reminds me of my mom when she " asked " my I open your mail . LMFAO
Hello, plaintiff. Your supposed to face the judges podium. Lol😅
14:35 DOUG BEATS THE DEFENDANT 😮
She doesn't want mail or boxes in mail 😂😂😂
Doug is the truth! 😅🤣😂
Doug is a wild boy. I wish he would rub it in more often!
Are u a copy cat ?
@@BebedollieI thought I seen a similar comment calling Doug a wild boy.
@@Bebedollie yeah, I saw it a couple times and thought we were all copying it :)
Lol 😂
"the company's payroll" lol what a company😂!
The way the plaintiff keeps looking.....👀
If she didn't hire the plaintiff to work the booth b/c she's not an employee, but she took it upon herself to work the booth anyway, then she just volunteered... I'm not paying someone to do work I never agreed for them to do. Sounds like she should've only been paid for the staging they agreed to, and it's nonsensical that neither of them thought it was worth putting in writing what they agreed to.
She knew how to refuse the box but didn't refuse the original mailed check...right
They’re both a mess.
Doug=Str8 Savage😂😂😂
The defendant is a crook. The only way a compan's payroll shuts down is when the company goes out of business.
But why do I want to try that Thai dressing now? 😂
The way the judge asked "did you bring some?" That's a mood, lol! 😂
wow just wow!! What a peice of work!
Why does she always ask a question then doesn't want the answer🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
When she asks a direct question and you see you're going to get an excuse instead of a definite yes/no/direct answer she'll stop you from talking...
Sometimes Doug is a Richard.
By the look on her face I don’t believe the defendant ever expected the judge to open the mail and catch her in her lie about the $100.😂
Plaintiff is a weirdo and I believe 100% inserted herself into the business of that day. Those farmers markets don’t make much money so it wouldn’t make sense to offer to pay someone to hang around when u already have 3 other people working.
Defendant didn’t set boundaries and should have sent that lady about her business.
Judge was being a real b… to the defendant for no reason and would not let her speak to explain herself. She can be extremely rude and unfair at times. Judge picks and chooses when she wants to enforce unconfirmed contracts and agreements.
The judge is biased against blacks and that is in every court system but the defendant screwed herself with showing a check made out for 210 even if it was extortion.
What the defendant should have said, is brought the proof that she had three people at the event working and then ask what purpose would it serve hiring someone who was there to do staging as one of her crew at an event that is not super busy and someone without proper knowledge of the product who was again there for providing staging. She is a swindler ie a hustler and jack of whatever trade and that is how the defendant should have described her.
She should have made it clear that at what point do some random woman approach her about staging then it goes from her doing a staging to becoming someone who is working in the business which is bongos ... I have seen this is other places where people show up to do a specific job then volunteer to do something else they see, then after they finish want to be paid for what they volunteered to do claiming they were being nice
It really grinds my gears when JM doesn't let people talk. Like stfu and let them tell their side of the story..sheesh!!!
Lol ouch. I'll let her know. If she let me talk. 😅😂😂🎉
I usually agree with that but this case I was yelling at the defendant “girl answer the question!!! Why you ain’t pay her?!!!” 😂
@@PhoenixForceTravelAgency 🤣🤣🤣
@@mr.B.Tubbs.352 🤣🤣🤣
@@mr.B.Tubbs.352😂😂
Wonder if the box was the same address as the first envelope. Why JM didn’t look for that?
Plaintiff said envelope with check was right address but she never received it. My guess is that it was delivered to wrong address and sent back and post office never tried to redeliver it.
@billmoran3219 ive wored in billing and what happened with that check happens a lot. Some of these mail carries are lazy and if they are substituting for another route they will just mark the mail undeliverable. It sad actually. I once had a bill returned marked undeliverable that was addressed to the post office itself because they had our services.
I have the feeling the plaintiff does this often. She probably wanders around flea markets and attaches herself to vendors. A certifiable mental case.
These two did no contracts but want to run a business lol 😂
😂😂😂 not him calling her stupid
I don't blame the plaintiff for not accepting box. She's right. I wouldn't have trusted the defendant either. Just send the check. Excuse by defendant, She's not an employee". No 💩 Sherlock, plaintiff never claimed to be😠
I agree, box could have contained a bag of exploding 💩
😂😂😂 That is hilarious he actually brought her stupid
They both crazy as h3ll 😵💫!
For sure!
Doug read my mind 😂😂😂😂
If she sent a check for less than what is owed. You won't have a leg to stand on. So no don't accept the lesser amount.
The plaintiff is an opportunist and the defendant needs to make things very plain . I don’t play games with people , literally send a text to confirm stuff a forehand . Maybe it’s because I’m a graduate in law , or maybe it’s because I have Anxiety. Either way I just operate differently ❤