Peter, you're a Kiwi legend, and it's great to have someone like you represent us at the cutting edge of business to and in space! Go NZ! Thanks, JMG, for another awesome interview!
Another awesome interview John, thank you. Peter back Is magnificent and I love that a country as small as New Zealand is competing in the top tier of space programs.
Watching Starship launch today gave me an idea of what it must've been like to see the SS Great Britain steam into NYC harbor in 1845. Imagine seeing an iron-hulled, screw-powered ship twice the size of anything before it, steaming into the city. It must've blown their minds-14 days across the Atlantic when a sailing ship might take weeks or more. I wonder how many people realize they're in a paradigm shift at the time? I suspect only a small percentage of nerds really paid attention today, and I'm sure in 1845 most people in NYC didn't pay much attention either. But the world changes in such ways, a great kick into tomorrow.
What gave me pause is how well that system responded to failures. They are further along than I think is realized by most people. So it loses an engine early in the launch, but no big deal, it continues on. Then the booster loses one of the three engines it uses to land, it literally exploded, yet it got itself to landing conditions on two engines, no problem. It seems it would have successfully landed if it were intended to do so on land. Then Starship itself has a large part of a fin melt off right before our eyes, and it still made it. That's a very dynamic, reactive system that's shaping up to be very good, which is exactly what you need if you want to carry humans.
That's so true bro. Did you hear the lady from space x crying and she announced the soft landing. Its so extraordinary. I cryed as well. I've been following rocketlab for years now because I'm from New Zealand. Rocketlab makes me feel that wonder and awe as well
@@braydeny We're in good shape on the science and space exploration front! We have multiple countries focusing on space and producing companies that are advancing it far further than ever in the past. Humanity is moving forward.
Great interview - love the mutual respect and candor - it's refreshing to hear the path less chosen leads to success - orbital success in Peter's case!
So happy for this! I’m a fan of Rocket Lab and coincidentally am reading Ashlee Vance’s book When the Heavens Went on Sale, in which Beck and Rocket Lab are featured prominently.
Not to take anything from this interwiev, I just want to say that i am thrilled to hear that Dr. Petkovski will be getting his chance to science his hypothesis. That was the most inspiring series i have ever encountered, on the topic of astrobiology and again if anyone from the team sees this, I wish you good sciencing Dr Janus and the team.
Love it love it love it 😁, soooo refreshing to see we are on the way to popping our collers rolling our sleeves up and stay 💯 on the work minus alot of advertiser's fee's ect, .... And target audience to...😊
I wonder if peter beck got the intial design idea from watching a bond movie, the early supposed concepts for his rockets seemed very similar to what spektre used one time.
@@EventHorizonShow no, i believe the movie was 'you only live twice' but it has been a very long time since i seen it so the title i may have wrong, definitely one of Connery's movies.
I didn't know about this channel JMG! I really like what Rocket Labs is doing along with Intuitive Machines. Maybe you could have Dr. Tim Crain on one time to discuss the science of things? All the best!
I agree. I would say the democratization of Space has been going on for a long time with the agencies of democratic nations exercising their people’s will. NASA, ESA, JAXA, CSA and even Roscosmos have been working together well for a long time. The Chinese do not do enough to effectively partner with their democratic counterparts. This march towards progress by these agencies might be slow to some, however it has been chugging along advancing along the way. I can respect that private companies are pushing the boundaries and expanding our horizons in space. They have spurred new interest and great innovation and I genuinely hope that progress continues at this speed or greater. But it is still commercialization. Billionaires and some millionaires along with crowd funded efforts raised mainly by the lower wealthy people for other wealthy people is commercialization. A spade is a spade. I do not hate it, it just is what it is. My hope is that NASA and others do not yield to these commercial interests and keep producing their own effective, or better, craft that will continue to compete and push the boundaries of human exploration and knowledge.
The lesson of the last 60 years is very clear: you don't get affordable access to space without the efficiencies that commercialization brings. "Democratization" of space sounds like a terrible government-oriented goal that has the potential to destroy the benefits of commercialization.
Rocket lab is smart with the small rockets they'll get a lot of jobs from more people not having to compete with companies like spaceX with massive giant rockets
Good interview. 50 years ago, if you weren't approved by the US or Soviet governments, you weren't getting anywhere near space. Now, even many high school science clubs can get enough budget to design, build, and get a cubesat launched by their pick of company. Not everyone can build a rocket, but more and more people can get their payload into orbit. The number of people that can afford that is increasing every day.
When will we see the SFS up and running? (Space Fuel Station) That must be a market in which one could make a killing. Every launch with the same parameters. Fine-tuned, standardized launch vehicle. Those reqs could really let you push to lower costs over time. But the product will be valuable for as long as deep space exploration needs fuels. You take up tanks of water as the payload. Safe. No frills. Use solar power in orbit to crack it.
What’s the comparison between the reentry velocities of SpaceX stage 2 and Neutron - or are we comparing to the SpaceX booster? Reason being, what method of heat protection will be needed by Neutron - given that it’s constructed from carbon fiber? Will it suffer the same issues as SpaceX upper stage?
Okay it took me a full day, but I think I caught up with my unwatched on this channel; Question for all you who love All things Event Horizon and JMG. Which is the better value folks? Apple podcast format, or Patreon format? I’m not looking for any bonuses, I just had to skip like 300 blaring loud ads for crap I don’t want to catch up while I had been busy. Please Event Horizon crew feel free to weigh in on who pays you better too. I’m going to do this one last video while I mod BG3 and then I’m through with hearing about a cell phone bike mount and non-processed dog food. I don’t have a bike or a dog! Or how about that online college, I got my Bachelors of Science 17 years ago NGCSU or whoever you are!
What I'm looking forward to is the evolution of Neutron. I'd love to see a heavy (50-70 tonne payload) version. That's kind of the size you need to launch modules and fuel tanks into orbit that would form part of an Earth orbit to Mars orbit transit vehicle.
When the Queen was still around, she'd have said "You give me some good Star Wars instead of all this fluff and then we'll start thinking about knighthood".
Your last question should have been what comes after rockets. Also why not make a gigantic mold for carbon fiber so you have a seamless body then apply a skin of your choice?
Look at all the people at Rocketlab still totally lacking awareness of working towards extremely criminal ends, but that will change for the better this year.
Peter Beck wasn't knighted. He was awarded KNZM,...which doesn't carry the title "Sir". ...and even if he was knighted he still wouldn't be "Sir" as that title is only used if the recipient of the knighthood is British.
Forgive me if I'm wrong (I'm neither from the UK or NZ), but isn't he as New Zealander technically a subject of King Charles, so eligible for a knighthood?
KNZM does carry the title "Sir" - it's in New Zealand legislation as a Royal Warrant: "Statutes of the New Zealand Order of Merit" 1996 as ordered by Elizabeth R.
"making it a ightweight structure makes it more reliable" ..does it..or does it make the profit nore reliable? i mean theres longterm business reliability and then theres i only have one life reliability. the dead guys would say its not reliable but the investors would say it is. didnt we learn from the submarine. seems we may need to check our solar system to see how long the resources can last us, and where we can get to using them. are we stuck or can we move outward? has anyone calculated? im so deeply saddened to see us heading into our future in space space as ferengi rather than humans.
I'm actually skeptical on this stuff and how much value it really has. I'm willing to be wrong as I am just as willing to bake a bad bread. There are so many variables and many of them require not reality but involving politics. Sigh.
"This is the most exciting time to be in the space industry." Yea no the Apollo era was far more spectacular. And what was supposed to happen in its wake would have been epic.
Yes it is. It means anyone with the means and the money can go to space. Right now that's not all that many people, but competition will soon drive that price down. Planes were expensive and dangerous in the 1920s, they were ubiquitous and safe by the 1970s... and much (not all) of that was down to private industry.
@@brick6347 and yet millions of people still cannot afford airfare, and have no say in where they build airports. Seems like you have no idea what democracy means, like you're just automatically equating it with capitalism as you also equate political power with wealth. I guess the Western propaganda machine did its job on you.
@@brick6347 So "anyone with the means" like you mean about 0.00001% of the population, and thats Democratization? Wow, I think you need to look up what the word means?
Depends on what you mean by democratization. We use the word in media to mean higher accessibility by more people. So instead of a handful of networks controlling all content, it's a matter of when anyone with the means can start a media outlet such as social media followings, youtube channels and the like. It is applied similarly within aerospace. It's not the literal political democratizing connotation, but the accessibility sense. And he's correct, as you drop costs overall, you make it more accessible to anyone with the means, which is far higher than 0.00001 percent. That's people that can build a rocket company. It's much higher for people wanting to launch something into space, that's actually now beyond the 1 percent, it's more like 20 percent. So take TH-cam. The vast majority of people are fully free to upload a youtube video. That does not mean everyone will, just a certain percentage that wants to do it, and have the means to own a camera, mic etc. needed for one that will get views. Almost no one however will have the resources to start a second youtube service. Still, it represents the democratization of content. Political democracy has little to do with it, other than a resemblance. The only people voting in a modern democracy are the people that have the means to do it. A car, the gasoline, bicycle, walking to the poll etc. In the case of the political democratization of space, that still wouldn't cover the means of getting there. It would be the creation of a space based governmental system independent of anything on earth that has a voting population that used to function on some other non-democratic system. It'll happen, but the democratization of space is like saying the democratization of land, it's too imprecise, so any space democracies would name themselves to differentiate that they do not speak for the entire universe (though some may claim to, but I doubt they'd be democracies).
@@JohnMichaelGodier ok but the name of the video IS the Democratization of Space, and you agree it's too imprecise. The democratization of land under capitalism implies exclusive use so that some people are left out of the process by design. And access relative to a platform like YT is kind of apples and oranges, because compelling content can be made with a cell phone but the platform is still the gatekeeper. Capital costs involved with access to space are far higher. I mean, I liked Salvage 1 with Andy Griffith, but not everyone can build a rocket in their junkyard, LOL. BTW that show is begging for a reboot...
I love the smell of musk, and whale booger too... but the comment was right... This new space industry seems more oligarchical than democratic, so far. When there's a Space Collective or a Moon Co-op, then I'll sing folk songs of the spacetrepeneurs.
This was an informative episode... I don't blame the host or guest for the cost and structure of space launches, or for how democratic it is. I was commenting on the response to the comment, not about the show or Sir Rocketman.
@@nabormendonca5742 So according to your logic, one must love Musk to like space. Like derrrrr....Musk is a vapour salesman and if you seriously think hes going to get us to mars you must believe in the tooth fairy and santa as well. He`s the only person I know that can have multiple Rockets blow up and spin it as a success. Whata he got to do to fail?
Peter, you're a Kiwi legend, and it's great to have someone like you represent us at the cutting edge of business to and in space! Go NZ!
Thanks, JMG, for another awesome interview!
Fun day today for space.
Still can't honestly see it being remotely usable though
@@Roguescienceguy some people have small minds
@@Roguescienceguy Haha what??
Another awesome interview John, thank you.
Peter back Is magnificent and I love that a country as small as New Zealand is competing in the top tier of space programs.
Crazy ay and Rocket Lab has just become a prime! And this is just the start.
Perfect timing with the Starship launch
Great to hear from Sir Peter. A great NZ visionary.
I love Peter Beck! This interview is huge for him! ;)
Watching Starship launch today gave me an idea of what it must've been like to see the SS Great Britain steam into NYC harbor in 1845. Imagine seeing an iron-hulled, screw-powered ship twice the size of anything before it, steaming into the city. It must've blown their minds-14 days across the Atlantic when a sailing ship might take weeks or more. I wonder how many people realize they're in a paradigm shift at the time? I suspect only a small percentage of nerds really paid attention today, and I'm sure in 1845 most people in NYC didn't pay much attention either. But the world changes in such ways, a great kick into tomorrow.
Fantastic point.
You 100% correct most don't understand whats unfolding so get ahead invest in Rocket Lab $RKLB before everyone wakes up to this.
What gave me pause is how well that system responded to failures. They are further along than I think is realized by most people. So it loses an engine early in the launch, but no big deal, it continues on. Then the booster loses one of the three engines it uses to land, it literally exploded, yet it got itself to landing conditions on two engines, no problem. It seems it would have successfully landed if it were intended to do so on land. Then Starship itself has a large part of a fin melt off right before our eyes, and it still made it. That's a very dynamic, reactive system that's shaping up to be very good, which is exactly what you need if you want to carry humans.
That's so true bro. Did you hear the lady from space x crying and she announced the soft landing. Its so extraordinary.
I cryed as well.
I've been following rocketlab for years now because I'm from New Zealand.
Rocketlab makes me feel that wonder and awe as well
@@braydeny We're in good shape on the science and space exploration front! We have multiple countries focusing on space and producing companies that are advancing it far further than ever in the past. Humanity is moving forward.
Always awesome guests and topics. I learned a lot of details about launching rockets I didn't know before!! Thank you, JMG.
Awesome guest you have there! Go RocketLab. Cant wait to see the Neutron.
Can't wait!
Thanks John love the content listen to all your channels while I work in a castor factory up here in Canada
Great interview - love the mutual respect and candor - it's refreshing to hear the path less chosen leads to success - orbital success in Peter's case!
This is one of the most interesting interviews on this channel thus far!
Great interview! I love living in these times! Thanks for the episode.
I follow the news about rocket lab from 2013... Great company. You can tell passionate people are on the team
Really excellent interview, John! Thanks a bunch! 😃
Stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊
Never stop, Mr. Godier.
Don't worry. You couldn't dynamite me out of this chair. It's just too enjoyable conducting these interviews.
it's just incredible to hear Peter Beck speak. I can't wait to apply for a job at RocketLab after I get my mechanical engineering degree
When you do, email us. We want to have you on the show. Seriously!
Nice job John
Impressive guest John - very much appreciated this one , learned a lot. Impressive , good guy 👍
So happy for this! I’m a fan of Rocket Lab and coincidentally am reading Ashlee Vance’s book When the Heavens Went on Sale, in which Beck and Rocket Lab are featured prominently.
Love rocket lab , investor frome belgium 👍✌️✌️✌️
The best!
Great, as per usual
Thank you! Cheers!
That was a really good one.
Another great episode.
Awesome!
Glad you think so!
Great video and information !
Without at all meaning anything negative, this rocket is so cute having just seen the launch of the massive Starship.. :)
Thanks again!
Not to take anything from this interwiev, I just want to say that i am thrilled to hear that Dr. Petkovski will be getting his chance to science his hypothesis. That was the most inspiring series i have ever encountered, on the topic of astrobiology and again if anyone from the team sees this, I wish you good sciencing Dr Janus and the team.
Love it love it love it 😁, soooo refreshing to see we are on the way to popping our collers rolling our sleeves up and stay 💯 on the work minus alot of advertiser's fee's ect, ....
And target audience to...😊
Good interview
Very interesting episode thank you Micheal love your content 🙏
I wonder if peter beck got the intial design idea from watching a bond movie, the early supposed concepts for his rockets seemed very similar to what spektre used one time.
Moonraker?
@@EventHorizonShow no, i believe the movie was 'you only live twice' but it has been a very long time since i seen it so the title i may have wrong, definitely one of Connery's movies.
@@EventHorizonShow Moonraker was the one with the shuttles, Drax, and Jaws.
Bong hits
I didn't know about this channel JMG! I really like what Rocket Labs is doing along with Intuitive Machines.
Maybe you could have Dr. Tim Crain on one time to discuss the science of things?
All the best!
Oh good call. We shall try to get him.
its not the democratization of space but the commercialization. The difference is profound.
Agreed. This isn't necessarily a good thing.
For democracy!!! Ready the drop pods xD
That's why I'm an investor in Rocket Lab $RKLB
I agree.
I would say the democratization of Space has been going on for a long time with the agencies of democratic nations exercising their people’s will. NASA, ESA, JAXA, CSA and even Roscosmos have been working together well for a long time. The Chinese do not do enough to effectively partner with their democratic counterparts.
This march towards progress by these agencies might be slow to some, however it has been chugging along advancing along the way.
I can respect that private companies are pushing the boundaries and expanding our horizons in space. They have spurred new interest and great innovation and I genuinely hope that progress continues at this speed or greater.
But it is still commercialization. Billionaires and some millionaires along with crowd funded efforts raised mainly by the lower wealthy people for other wealthy people is commercialization. A spade is a spade. I do not hate it, it just is what it is.
My hope is that NASA and others do not yield to these commercial interests and keep producing their own effective, or better, craft that will continue to compete and push the boundaries of human exploration and knowledge.
The lesson of the last 60 years is very clear: you don't get affordable access to space without the efficiencies that commercialization brings. "Democratization" of space sounds like a terrible government-oriented goal that has the potential to destroy the benefits of commercialization.
Let’s gooo new gideo
New gideooooo
@@EventHorizonShow Someone was drinking while watching SpaceX launch.
In a world of Chloe Swabricks, be a Sir Peter beck!
Rocket lab is smart with the small rockets they'll get a lot of jobs from more people not having to compete with companies like spaceX with massive giant rockets
Agreed why catch a buss when you can Uber 😏
Proud to be an investor in Rocket Lab $RKLB
I've got 5% of my net worth in rocketlab.
Only 20 grand nz, but it feels safer than the bank
🚀
11:33 ...It's almost like it's a visual representation of Archer's "PHRASING!!" ...
🤣
Good interview. 50 years ago, if you weren't approved by the US or Soviet governments, you weren't getting anywhere near space. Now, even many high school science clubs can get enough budget to design, build, and get a cubesat launched by their pick of company. Not everyone can build a rocket, but more and more people can get their payload into orbit. The number of people that can afford that is increasing every day.
This is bound to be interesting.
And I have to go bed... 😞
I watched it, as expected a great interview.🎉
When will we see the SFS up and running? (Space Fuel Station)
That must be a market in which one could make a killing. Every launch with the same parameters. Fine-tuned, standardized launch vehicle. Those reqs could really let you push to lower costs over time. But the product will be valuable for as long as deep space exploration needs fuels. You take up tanks of water as the payload. Safe. No frills. Use solar power in orbit to crack it.
Methane rockets, blasting around the solar system, with gas stations where the supply is plentiful.
Better to ask yourself why isn't there satellite refueling..
I'm sure Elon must be thinking of this as you speak! 👍
Can you use the doors to slow down the landing?
In principle maybe, but there may be practical reasons not to.
What’s the comparison between the reentry velocities of SpaceX stage 2 and Neutron - or are we comparing to the SpaceX booster? Reason being, what method of heat protection will be needed by Neutron - given that it’s constructed from carbon fiber? Will it suffer the same issues as SpaceX upper stage?
Okay it took me a full day, but I think I caught up with my unwatched on this channel; Question for all you who love All things Event Horizon and JMG. Which is the better value folks? Apple podcast format, or Patreon format? I’m not looking for any bonuses, I just had to skip like 300 blaring loud ads for crap I don’t want to catch up while I had been busy. Please Event Horizon crew feel free to weigh in on who pays you better too. I’m going to do this one last video while I mod BG3 and then I’m through with hearing about a cell phone bike mount and non-processed dog food. I don’t have a bike or a dog! Or how about that online college, I got my Bachelors of Science 17 years ago NGCSU or whoever you are!
Proper Hobbit rocket. Hope to see the Venus launch soon!
You duckedm the tough question why wasn't the rocket named Muon instead of Neutron?
The TV show Salvage coming true.
What I'm looking forward to is the evolution of Neutron. I'd love to see a heavy (50-70 tonne payload) version. That's kind of the size you need to launch modules and fuel tanks into orbit that would form part of an Earth orbit to Mars orbit transit vehicle.
Rocket maaaaaaan
🎵Burning out his fuse up here alone ...
JMG Bob Iger jus got "Knighted"
Why I don't know
When the Queen was still around, she'd have said "You give me some good Star Wars instead of all this fluff and then we'll start thinking about knighthood".
0:59 0:22
Your last question should have been what comes after rockets. Also why not make a gigantic mold for carbon fiber so you
have a seamless body then apply a skin of your choice?
Look at all the people at Rocketlab still totally lacking awareness of working towards extremely criminal ends, but that will change for the better this year.
Peter Beck wasn't knighted. He was awarded KNZM,...which doesn't carry the title "Sir".
...and even if he was knighted he still wouldn't be "Sir" as that title is only used if the recipient of the knighthood is British.
Forgive me if I'm wrong (I'm neither from the UK or NZ), but isn't he as New Zealander technically a subject of King Charles, so eligible for a knighthood?
@brick6347 yes that is true , Australia and NZ are still technically part of English commonwealth.
@@brick6347 Anybody can be knighted,....only a British Subject, once knighted, is called "Sir".
KNZM does carry the title "Sir" - it's in New Zealand legislation as a Royal Warrant: "Statutes of the New Zealand Order of Merit" 1996 as ordered by Elizabeth R.
@@paulcarter7445 Well I'll be!
Yes
"making it a ightweight structure makes it more reliable" ..does it..or does it make the profit nore reliable? i mean theres longterm business reliability and then theres i only have one life reliability. the dead guys would say its not reliable but the investors would say it is.
didnt we learn from the submarine.
seems we may need to check our solar system to see how long the resources can last us, and where we can get to using them. are we stuck or can we move outward? has anyone calculated?
im so deeply saddened to see us heading into our future in space space as ferengi rather than humans.
Is Avi Loeb being censored/silenced? 🤠 would appreciate an update!
Ignored. Man is heavily biased.
No, just nothing recent to talk about.
Color me impressed with getting 40 minutes of that guy’s time.
Orientate? To orient eastward?
To orient would be to orientate eastward though
I'm actually skeptical on this stuff and how much value it really has. I'm willing to be wrong as I am just as willing to bake a bad bread. There are so many variables and many of them require not reality but involving politics. Sigh.
"Private Research" a dismal phrase.
If you imagine space is Democratized, just try to develop anti-gravity:) You will NOT be allowed, but you can play with fireworks:)
"Yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah, I'm better than Elon!" - a true story if you're dumb enough to listen
Glorified Fireworks are untenable
"This is the most exciting time to be in the space industry."
Yea no the Apollo era was far more spectacular. And what was supposed to happen in its wake would have been epic.
We are starting the epic part now
Really?
Who voted for this? What parties are involved? What government?
Because all I see are oligarchs.
privatization is not democratization
Yes it is. It means anyone with the means and the money can go to space. Right now that's not all that many people, but competition will soon drive that price down. Planes were expensive and dangerous in the 1920s, they were ubiquitous and safe by the 1970s... and much (not all) of that was down to private industry.
@@brick6347 and yet millions of people still cannot afford airfare, and have no say in where they build airports. Seems like you have no idea what democracy means, like you're just automatically equating it with capitalism as you also equate political power with wealth. I guess the Western propaganda machine did its job on you.
@@brick6347 So "anyone with the means" like you mean about 0.00001% of the population, and thats Democratization? Wow, I think you need to look up what the word means?
Depends on what you mean by democratization. We use the word in media to mean higher accessibility by more people. So instead of a handful of networks controlling all content, it's a matter of when anyone with the means can start a media outlet such as social media followings, youtube channels and the like. It is applied similarly within aerospace. It's not the literal political democratizing connotation, but the accessibility sense. And he's correct, as you drop costs overall, you make it more accessible to anyone with the means, which is far higher than 0.00001 percent. That's people that can build a rocket company. It's much higher for people wanting to launch something into space, that's actually now beyond the 1 percent, it's more like 20 percent.
So take TH-cam. The vast majority of people are fully free to upload a youtube video. That does not mean everyone will, just a certain percentage that wants to do it, and have the means to own a camera, mic etc. needed for one that will get views. Almost no one however will have the resources to start a second youtube service. Still, it represents the democratization of content. Political democracy has little to do with it, other than a resemblance. The only people voting in a modern democracy are the people that have the means to do it. A car, the gasoline, bicycle, walking to the poll etc. In the case of the political democratization of space, that still wouldn't cover the means of getting there. It would be the creation of a space based governmental system independent of anything on earth that has a voting population that used to function on some other non-democratic system. It'll happen, but the democratization of space is like saying the democratization of land, it's too imprecise, so any space democracies would name themselves to differentiate that they do not speak for the entire universe (though some may claim to, but I doubt they'd be democracies).
@@JohnMichaelGodier ok but the name of the video IS the Democratization of Space, and you agree it's too imprecise. The democratization of land under capitalism implies exclusive use so that some people are left out of the process by design. And access relative to a platform like YT is kind of apples and oranges, because compelling content can be made with a cell phone but the platform is still the gatekeeper. Capital costs involved with access to space are far higher. I mean, I liked Salvage 1 with Andy Griffith, but not everyone can build a rocket in their junkyard, LOL. BTW that show is begging for a reboot...
Did y'all see the thunderfoot stream? 😂😂😂
Peter beck has millions of dollars but he always uses very bad microphones in all interviews
Democratization of space? I never voted for them lol
Maybe there are more Martians than Earthlings, and they outvoted us.
More like the oligarchization of space.
Exactly. Using tax payers money like Musk.
A Musk hater that loves spaces enough to comment here. You’re must be feeling miserable today. 😂
I love the smell of musk, and whale booger too... but the comment was right... This new space industry seems more oligarchical than democratic, so far. When there's a Space Collective or a Moon Co-op, then I'll sing folk songs of the spacetrepeneurs.
This was an informative episode... I don't blame the host or guest for the cost and structure of space launches, or for how democratic it is. I was commenting on the response to the comment, not about the show or Sir Rocketman.
@@nabormendonca5742 So according to your logic, one must love Musk to like space. Like derrrrr....Musk is a vapour salesman and if you seriously think hes going to get us to mars you must believe in the tooth fairy and santa as well. He`s the only person I know that can have multiple Rockets blow up and spin it as a success. Whata he got to do to fail?