ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ต.ค. 2024
- Ran a Double Onager build at smaller 2-round tournament!
Curious about any products you see in my videos? Check my website for more information about them! www.crabbok.com...
Don't forget to use code CRABBOKVIP to save 15% on exquisite tokens!
Luxury Playstyle - luxuryplaystyl...
Join the Team on Patreon - / crabbok
Check out my website! www.crabbok.com
Discord Server - / discord
Twitter - / crabbok
Facebook - / crabbok-171946272822652
Triple Onager is the only logical conclusion! I’ve flown this on Vassal a few times, and it’s pretty scary. Like triple Cymoons, only better because of the extended range and additional dice fixing:
Onager Overload (397/400)
Commander: Darth Vader
[flagship] Onager-class Testbed (96)
- Darth Vader (36)
- Orbital Bombardment Particle Cannons (5)
- Ordnance Experts (4)
- Veteran Gunners (5)
= 146 total points
Onager-class Testbed (96)
- Admiral Titus (2)
- Orbital Bombardment Particle Cannons (5)
- Ordnance Experts (4)
- Veteran Gunners (5)
= 112 total points
Onager-class Testbed (96)
- Strategic Adviser (4)
- Orbital Bombardment Particle Cannons (5)
- Ordnance Experts (4)
- Veteran Gunners (5)
= 114 total points
Gozanti-class Cruisers (23)
- Comms Net (2)
= 25 total points
A salvo volley to take down an SSD. Nice...
Congratulations! I'm just guessing the SSD never bothered to heal, though, and just relied on his total health pool? That is a common mistake I see with that particular ship. I always run engineering early, especially with Jerjerrod. Any other Commander I will split engineering with concentrate fire, and take nav only if I need to turn once. I never bother with squadrons except as a purely defensive tactic with rapid launch bays.
I failed to understand why that SSD didn't moved its front arc against the Onagers. Or did he honestly thought the SSD side arcs were enough to destroy 2 Onagers? Also, you do need to make a carrier list someday. Squadrons are fun too. At least I love them. :3
Try tiple star destroyer onager with XI7 and orbital bombardment superweapon with admiral Vader... that thing is pure cancer !
You want all 3 to have overlapping arcs of fire and concentrate on one target.
I'm surprised at the survivability of the Onager without an ISD or VSD supporting.
FFG really knew what they were doing with the arcs. The side arcs on the Onager are less vulnerable than one would thing thanks to the angle on it.
Onager FEVER!
A massive fleet of Onagers would have looked far cooler in the final Star Wars movie than what we got in the end....
You might have given me a reason to get a second Onager. I wasn't sure it could be done competitively.
Taking Ozzel and going first with the SSD might have been a little too blood thirsty...kill or be killed...a calculated risk that came up short with a failed volley on the arquittens on round 2. It lead to a late engagement on the Onagers and forfeited potential double arcs on the targets that were more critical. Had I taken down one Onager during R5 I might have survived with a few hull remaining. I wish I could have had just 1 volley out of my front arc on the nearest. A poor shot out of my right arc on R5 was disappointing and set up my desperation on R6. If I knew that I was flying against double Onagers, I might have gone for Romodi with a defensive liason officer. Brunson would have been a much better choice than Ozzel, and maybe Needa or Demesne. Krennic worked well on R1 but failed hard on R2..and was then Vader fodder during R5. I liked the heavy turbos and SW7s....made you think twice about using your salvos. XX9s upgrade was a poor choice, although one that heightens suspense and is a lot of fun to play with...damage cards don't punish ignition attacks enough unfortunately. LTT would have been better. Spinal armament would have been optimal. QBT a temptation, but didn't want to give up heavy transponder net. I also agree that Onagers feel a little bit overtuned. Maybe 1 less shield in the front arc, or 1-2 less hull would make it feel less tanky than an ISD...and right now they don't really....just my opinion. But maybe that's intended. I didn't realize they could go speed 3 as well. Overall, It would be hard for me to think up a better match up that favored double onagers. You definitely deserved the win. Well played crabbok!
i honestly feel like the onager is a bit too strong. Its not a glass cannon, its just tanky enough to be annoying to take down and MAN does it hit hard and difficult to avoid.
2 Onagers vs SSD. Wow, thats a battle I would love to see
Wish I could have been there! I'm missing out on all the fun!
Nice wins! I still need to get my Onager, hard to find in my stores
2:31 gunnery team is from Austria, apparently.
You mean Australia?
@@wyatttyson7737 That's the joke within joke.
This is a good setup of gamers
Best armada content and battle reports on the net 👍🏻
Double StarHawks would probably smash most Imperial Fleets.... just saying, especially if you had them tanky.
How does Onager Ignition dice and Fire Lanes interacts?
Carriers tend to be slow, so I think it'd be easier to snipe them.
The onager seems crazy powerful, I've fought it twice now and it tears through things! Congrats though!
With it's low cost and Intel Officer is seems to be borderline broken. There are very few ships that can reliably avoid being shot twice. You take out the brace, and you're likely to kill your target with another heavy-hitter, like another Onager or an ISD.
like the red highlights on your ships.
I think it's cost too much to do double
Why did your first opponent run the Advanced Transponder Net without any heavy squadrons?
It's to help out against Intel.
The SSD had a chance, but it wasn't kitted out well at all.
gratz on winning :-P
Nice!