MQA vs FLAC. And the convenience of modern hires streaming.

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 6

  • @SharonDavis-v6n
    @SharonDavis-v6n 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Wilson Christopher Robinson Susan Robinson Anthony

  • @superslug1000
    @superslug1000 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    MQA is a complete load of bollocks. Doesn’t even sound as good as CD

  • @aussie8114
    @aussie8114 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This month Tidal will replace all the MQA tracks with FLAC.
    If you like Apple Music then why not Airplay it over to the power node. Airplay will deliver CD quality.

  • @martineyles
    @martineyles ปีที่แล้ว

    HiRes audio over Bluetooth is really a misnomer. Bluetooth, even in the latest versions, doesn't offer a high enough bandwidth for even CD quality lossless audio. All the Bluetooth codecs are lossy, and worse still, most are optimised for latency, which requires them to be low complexity (SBC, all aptx variants and LDAC), making them less efficient, and having to throw away more audio information at a given bitrate. Even where the codec spec isn't optimsed for this (AAC), the implementation will be (ie, the Apple AAC encoder will opt for latency over quality). AptX and LDAC's "Hi Res" implementations try to compensate by using higher bandwidths than your typical MP3 or AAC, but even with LDACs 900kbps, pretty much maxing out Bluetooth's bandwidth, it will be a lower quality than CD. In order to carry any audio information above 20kHz it has to throw away more audio below 20kHz, which is generally the most important part of the music. Thankfully, your streamer isn't rellying on the Bluetooth for the audio part, so as long as you're using the speakers or using wired headphones you can benefit from better sound.

  • @kwokhungleung4623
    @kwokhungleung4623 ปีที่แล้ว

    So boring