I believe Autoart is more correct shape, and the wiper is also correct size. But CMC exceed in better workmanship quality. More parts used, more heavy and feel more quality on hand. Way more detail engine, real leather seat.
@@glenissmith9209 I agree with this assessment and I've seen a lot of 1:1 Porsche 911s from the 1960s in person. It seems Autoart has problems with rear angles. It's not just with this car, check out their Countaches. The rear of this model and that of the 911S seem way longer than they should be. Side windows and rear quarter windows also seem smaller than those of the real thing. To me, Autoart either takes a lot of creative liberties on car shapes or has an in-house 3D modeler who just eyeballs photos of cars on the Internet instead of requesting official CAD data or using 3D scanners on real cars. They focus on details and finishing instead of the actual shape of the car.
As an owner of both CMC and AutoArt models, this is a grossly unfair comparison. £150 vs £500. If one doesn't get more for the £500 something's very, very wrong. Most unfair.
??? what the hell are you on about, this is just a video showing the difference you get going up the scale model ladder. this was extremely educational and the uploader deserves full recognition for providing this reference!
Not sure about the Porsche, but I have issues with the CMC 250GTO - hyperdetailed it may be, but the sit and the overall shape that makes the GTO so special are missed. Give me the Kyosho any day - the sit and shape are superb.
You get what you pay for. Thanks for the effort.
CMC has more detail and costs more.
I believe Autoart is more correct shape, and the wiper is also correct size. But CMC exceed in better workmanship quality. More parts used, more heavy and feel more quality on hand. Way more detail engine, real leather seat.
Look for an article titled a question of Porsche, Diecasxchange. The Autoart shape is wrong.
@@glenissmith9209 I agree with this assessment and I've seen a lot of 1:1 Porsche 911s from the 1960s in person. It seems Autoart has problems with rear angles. It's not just with this car, check out their Countaches.
The rear of this model and that of the 911S seem way longer than they should be. Side windows and rear quarter windows also seem smaller than those of the real thing.
To me, Autoart either takes a lot of creative liberties on car shapes or has an in-house 3D modeler who just eyeballs photos of cars on the Internet instead of requesting official CAD data or using 3D scanners on real cars. They focus on details and finishing instead of the actual shape of the car.
In this case cmc without doubt.
It opens everything and has superb details
But Autoart is sharper looking I think
The Autoart is nicer in some ways not as detailed but at a quarter of the price would have it above the CMC.
Considering the cost, I'll take the autoart one.
CMC 901 최고입니다
멋진 영상 좋아요 😀👍
Very nice 👍
😄hahaaa.....cmc always is the king lah........more detail.the best。
CMC is a clear winner in this comparison, but i hate it's pale-yellow color
Автоарт уже не тот)
Very Nice, 😻😻😻😊😊😊
Which one is Autoart?
I guess the blue one is autoart
As an owner of both CMC and AutoArt models, this is a grossly unfair comparison. £150 vs £500. If one doesn't get more for the £500 something's very, very wrong. Most unfair.
??? what the hell are you on about, this is just a video showing the difference you get going up the scale model ladder. this was extremely educational and the uploader deserves full recognition for providing this reference!
500£ haha, these sell for 200-300 a lot of times lol
Only £ 500 really? I thought they where like 5000 just like Amallgam models, and I consider CMC better.
Not sure about the Porsche, but I have issues with the CMC 250GTO - hyperdetailed it may be, but the sit and the overall shape that makes the GTO so special are missed. Give me the Kyosho any day - the sit and shape are superb.
Nope, you are totally wrong. I bought CMC Porsche 901 for £95 back in 2008-2009. 🥴
AutoArt is JUNK compared to CMC.
911....